Would Romney Have Been Better?

Maybe; maybe not. But he couldn’t have been WORSE than what we’ve got. It’s a pitiful thing that we only had these two choices. Between disaster and slight problems, like with most presidents. I have my own problems with George Bush, but in spite of all the LIES the liberals told about him, he wasn’t all that bad a president. He tried his best to reverse the damage the Democrats made when they passed their law in 1976 that forced banks to loan money to people who could NOT ever repay it  (The “Community Reinvestment Act of 1976), thus DOOMING us financially eventually. Up to the very last of his administration unemployment was low enough to be considered statistically non-existent, UNTIL the effect of that law showed full force. He was enjoying the boom economy that came from Ronald Reagan’s LOWERING of the tax base until the Democrats made it go away.

MAYBE Romney could have done something about that, if he could have kept the Democrats who foisted it upon us from blocking his every effort (12 times), as they did to Bush. No, we did NOT give Obama “the worst economy since the big depression.” That’s one of the biggest LIES the Democrats have ever told us. Today’s economy was CREATED by that law and its effect. In no way was that Bush’s fault. Romney might have even been a GOOD president; we’ll never know now because the Democrats have LIED him into obscurity. If we survive Obama as a nation (doubtful) history may eventually tell us the truth about him. But if we elect yet another socialist Democrat (such as Hillary or Chelsea), or even a “left-wing Republican” like John McCain, we’re DOOMED. (Eagle Rising)