Friday, November 22, 2013
Texas Didn't Kill Kennedy
When a sniper took aim and blew President John
Kennedy’s brains all over the back of the front seat of that open Cadillac
limousine that day, he “changed the world,” according to legend. That happened
in Dallas, Texas and many attribute that killing to Texas. They’re wrong: Texas
didn’t kill Kennedy, somebody who hated him, rightly or wrongly, killed
Kennedy. Kennedy’s POLICIES killed Kennedy, but his death has long been blamed
on the State of Texas. His death has spawned a “cottage industry” making a LOT
of money for people arguing about whether his death was due to ONE SHOOTER or
several. The “Warren Commission, after much talk and spending much money,
decided it was. It may or may not have been. But Texas didn’t kill Kennedy,
WASHINGTON did. I had my own problems with Kennedy’s policies. They were the
subjects of the FIRST pamphlet I wrote to comment on political actions,
entitled, “I Am An Extremist!” It detailed the many things about which I was extremely
angry” and lampooned the extremists who called ME an extremist for them. But my
objections to his policies didn’t rise to the level of wishing him dead. Today,
many have decided there WAS, in fact, a second shooter; that Oswald was a lousy
shot and missed THREE times, leaving it necessary for a second shooter to fire
the lethal shot and get he job done (I still find it hard to imagine Oswald as
a Marine).
We
will never know because the “investigation” into the Kennedy killing was one of
the worst botched “investigations” in memory. Evidence was altered, the very
AUTOPSY done on his body is said to have been botched, and the only man who
really KNEW if there was a second shooter was MURDERED by a man who had some
strange “friendships” among government people, before he could be properly
questioned. Yes, his murder did change many things: for one, the president has
never paraded around in an open limousine since. Presidential security has
increased considerably. Kennedy was a liberal, as liberals were known then.
Some of his policies would have made today’s politicians call him a
conservative. One of those was to LOWER the tax base and by so doing INCREASE
the “tax take,” an action repeated by one of his successors, Ronald Reagan,
with similar results, almost DOUBLING the “tax take” in the following years
until liberals managed to raise it significantly since, thus LOWERING “the tax
take,” while bemoaning that decrease without ever admitting it was THEIR
ACTIONS that had done it. Even though most of Kennedy’s actions WERE liberal,
this is just ONE that I would have heartily approved of, though I was not yet
sufficiently knowledgeable to know that.
I
disapproved of his actions toward Cuba, including his attempt to kill Castro,
though I am not, and never will be a Castro supporter. I merely thought his
action in APPROVING the “Bay of Pigs invasion, then “pulling our support out,”
leaving his troops to die, and creating a situation where we had to pay a LOT
of money to get some of his prisoners released, though he and other politicians
denied that ever happened. There were other things to which I objected, but I
will not enumerate them here. Yes, I’ve been observing politics that long, and
things have not gotten better since. In fact they have gotten “progressively”
worse. Terminally worse, in my opinion, and that leads me to wonder why Barack
Obama is still alive. Maybe it’s because only a right-winger would want to kill
him and only leftists do that(maybe it is the specter of Joe Biden as president
that is good insurance against assassination). They tried to convince the world
Kennedy was killed by a right-winger when it happened (as usual). But it was
not to be, since Oswald (his presumed killer) was a “dedicated leftist and
known communist,” which somehow could NOT be hidden from the world.
Progressivism (communism) was in decline then, and they started calling
themselves LIBERALS to fool us. Liberalism is now KNOWN to be a “cover” for
those who wish this country to be a COLLECTIVIST (communist, socialist, etc.)
nation. Progressivism has regained its prominence as an “alternate name” for
communism since its real definition has been forgotten.
Yes,
Kennedy’s murder did “change the world,” but not for the better, because
politicians have so messed things up since. We have slipped ever closer to
becoming the “Soviet Union” of the 21st Century as politicians
worked tirelessly to create a “collectivist (socialist) society.” Obama is the
“front man” of that effort, having been BORN to communist parents, RAISED as a
communist, schooled by communists, and mentored by communists. How could he be
ANYTHING but a communist in his thinking, even if he might not be a
“card-carrying member” of the communist party It is his collectivist THINKING
that counts, reinforced, as it has been by his communist mentors over the years
after his communist upbringing. His support for Muslims, however, is strange,
if you didn’t know that Islam has ALSO been a big part of his upbringing,
having been born (whether he will admit it or not) in a Muslim country and
raised in Muslim schools. It would be amazing to me if he WEREN’T a Muslin
sympathizer. All that aside, it is his ACTIONS that tell me he is both a
collectivist (socialist) and a Muslim sympathizer who would make this country
REPLACE RUSSIA as a collectivist “showcase nation” for a while, until it
collapses of its own weight, as did Soviet Russia. Collectivist nations can
NEVER survive for long because they produce NOTHING. Russia survived longer
than it would have without America’s financial support..
They
DEPEND on the labor of those capable and WILLING to earn for themselves to
provide money and property to steal and redistribute to others, who are NOT
“producers.” Collectivism destroys INCENTIVE, which is NECESSARY for progress,
and that will kill collectivism in this country ultimately, as it did in
Russia, though probably not in my lifetime. I am glad I am as old as I am (76),
and will not live to see most of what is coming. But I am sad to know that my
progeny will. I have tried my best to stop it from happening, but I fear I’ve
failed. So I will just have to watch it happening until my time comes, which I
fear will not be long, with Obama controlling the health profession in his
ignorance. (11/22/13)
Reprinted
from “One Man’s Opinion with permission.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Well laid out!
Anon: Thanks. But did it tell you anything you didn't know?
No. It didn't. But then I pay attention. Too bad libtards avoid reading blogs like this one.
Anon: I'm glad SOME people do.
Post a Comment