If they'd banned "strip tease dances," I could understand it. But banning "cleavage?" It's a study in futility, since many of the girls show their boyfriends a lot more than cleavage after school. (Especially when they're giving them oral sex, which is happening a LOT more often these days than before, after Bill Clinton told them "oral sex is not sex.") Then there's the girl's tendency to wear certain clothes when someone who doesn't like it will be watching, then change to something a LOT more revealing later (Wearing it underneath until then). Another thing. Women -- adult and young, dress provocatively all the time, and then criticize boys (and men) for constantly "thinking about sex." Tell me: what are these GIRLS thinking about when they wear their short skirts and half-unbuttoned blouses. and pants so low and tight they'd split them if they bent over? You'd think if they REALLY thought less of the male sex for thinking about sex all the time, THEY'D stop thinking about sex all the time themselves. No, no! I don't say women are "asking for it" when they get raped while wearing provocative clothing. They should ALWAYS be able to reserve the right to say "no." But they should stop "titillating" the opposite sex if they think less of the male sex for thinking about sex all the time. And they should stop BLAMING them for thinking that way. I don't condone rape by any means. But I think as long as they titillate men and boys by the way they dress, they should accept the consequences, that being that men think about sex often. Girls didn't dare dress that way when I was young and, while teenagers still thought of sex often, it wasn't nearly as often as today. (Key TV, 8/4/06)
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Texas School District Bans "Cleavage"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment