Do Terrorists Have Rights?

"Enemy combatants captured on the battlefield do not have due process rights or Geneva Convention protection. [Should we have given Nazis such rights during WWII? -RT] The obsession with international law has to stop. America must come first if we are to preserve the founding principles that made this country great, protect our national security interests and protect our citizens. Those are things that Jimmy Carter, anti-Semite and terrorist coddler, would know nothing about. The ticking time bomb scenario: we capture an enemy who knows the whereabouts of a nuclear bomb, just 24 hours from annihilating an American city. Do we rough him up or read him his Miranda rights? Defeating radical Islam is a complicated matter, but failure is not an option. Our future and freedom are on the line." For my part, I'd "rough him up." Actually, I'd do more than "rough him up." If I was the one who caught him in the act, he wouldn't make it that far. Jimmy Carter says, "But you can make your own definition of human rights and say, 'we don't violate them.' And ... you can make your own definition of torture and say 'we don't violate it,' " said the former Democratic president and Nobel laureate." Really! Jimmy is stating how many liberal Democrats look at things, which is why they can get away with lying and deny it. Like Henry Waxman denying he's got 50 "investigators" snooping around Rush Limbaugh. The number is probably more like 60. So he can deny 50 and not be lying (technically). (Breitbart, 10/10/07)