They Lie, and They Lie

Nancy Peelosi lied repeatedly about the number of kids 19 or younger having been killed by guns. The actual number is 7 children killed in a day, not 47, as she repeatedly “reported.” You have to really lie a lot to get “Four Pinocchios” from the Washington Post, but she did it. And gun control is not the only thing she has lied about. Unfortunately, I could write a book about the many lies she has told. When questioned about the disparity, she tried to make the questioner believe she just misspoke—many times. Another lie she tells—a lie of omission—is that most of those she lists were young gang members who were the instigators of their shootings and usually shot first, with an ILLEGAL gun. Frankly, I wonder how any of the “gun control” laws could have stopped that from happening. She touts all the usual ones, lists of legal gun owners she calls “background checks,” “gun lock safes,” and “gun-free zones,” just to name a few. “Gun buybacks” are just a way for bangers to get rid of their old, useless guns and have the money to buy new ones. Show me a single one of their anti-gun fool laws that has EVER stopped a single instance of “gun crime.” The biggest lie they tell is the one when they go on national TV and say they have. The Post says there’s no need to “goose the numbers” because “gun crime” is a serious problem. What is not said is none of the laws she touts does anything to solve that problem. (Truth About Guns)

"We'll Shoot Back!"

The Sheriff of Butler County, Ohio is my kind of cop. He doesn’t take sh-t from anybody, like many of today’s law officers do. Some naturally, others under the misguided orders of the politicians that tie their hands. It pains me to see thugs pretending to be simple “demonstrators” hitting cops and not getting hit in return. Rioters holding up their cell phones in case a cop does strike back are ubiquitous at all the riots because they know the liberals in government will punish those cops, rather than the rioters if they do. Sheriff Richard K. Jones told those fools a simple message: “You shoot at us, we’re going to shoot back.” No pussy-footing around with this law enforcement officer. The subtext here is that if a thug assaults a cop, he can expect to be “taken down,” with whatever force deemed necessary. This is how policing is supposed to be. If you break the law, you WILL be “taken down,” and with whatever force is necessary, regardless of their cell phone videos—and the politicians at the top should “have the back” of their cops, rather than take away their tools, making them operate with both hands tied behind their backs. We need more cops like this. (The Blaze)

Whipping Up Hate

Joe Biden has joined the bigots that lecture us on bigotry. Such as the father of a petty thief, rapist, and violator of a restraining order to rape again son, who got shot 7 times for his trouble as he reached for a knife in his attempt to escape from the cops who were trying to arrest him for his crimes. His father is a 100% Farrakhan supporter and bigot in his own right. Farrakhan, the man who refers to Jews as “crackers” and hates all white people. Biden’s latest ad suggests that black people should be afraid to leave their homes because the cops are “out hunting them” and “want to kill them.” ANY TIME a black man gets shot by a cop an “instant riot” ensues, even if that black man has a gun and is ready to kill that cop.”Demonstrators” (rioters) fly in from all over, to loot, burn, and destroy property. All paid for by Dumbocrats with money that came from the likes of George Soros, the billionaire who is trying to destroy America. Facts don’t matter. The “Black Lives Matter” fools, who deny the fact that ALL lives matter, dictate this, and will attack anybody who disagrees. BLM fools all over the country are seizing on every possible opportunity to “whip up hate” for cops, and all white people. They are trying their best to start a new American civil war, where they hope to come out on top. Liberal politicians (Dumbocrats all) agree with them, support them, and “hamstring” their cops with new regulations that tie their hands, and make criminals out of them for doing their duty. Soon, they won’t have to de-fund the cops. There won’t be any left, as they quit in disgust. (Just common sense)

Suing the Gun Maker

That’s about as stupid as suing the sun for you getting sunburned. If there is any competent judge in this country (or any country) who is not dedicated to pushing the liberal platform, I hope this gets in front of him/her. Frankly, if this is allowed to be adjudicated, then think about the thousands of lawsuits that are going to be filed against automakers because one of their customers did something stupid with their cars. There is nothing “actionable” in manufacturing guns. The only time the gun is able to hurt someone is when it is held in the hand of an evil-doer, and the manufacturer cannot be responsible for that. Yes, guns can (and do) kill people. Sometimes illegally, other times legally, by cops trying to keep us safe. If this suit succeeds, it will be a major miscarriage of justice, and will have a “chilling effect” on gun manufacturers everywhere. The person or persons filing this suit just want a “big payday” and they have selected this innocent maker of a LEGAL product to be the paymaster. It will also have a chilling effect on manufacturers of legal producers everywhere—not just gunmakers. they’re suing Smith & Wesson for not including “smart gun” technology in the manufacture of their guns. Which is abysmally stupid of them. Smart Gun technology is “iffy,” at best. And they have no right to dictate what is included in S&W products. (Captain’s Journal)

Draconian Punishments "Under Law"

The Constitution prohibits punishments being “cruel and unusual.” I ask you: is it “cruel and unusual to find a business owner $10,000.00 for being open against regulations?” (Not laws, passed by a legislature, but “regulations” imposed by one politician) Meanwhile, top politicians (Nancy Peelosi) get their hair done in a closed parlor in violation of those “regulations,” and then blame the people who revealed it by condemning them for taking a video of her doing it without her permission. How about a 10 year prison sentence for violating one of those “regulations?” They are, “oh, so incensed” when citizens (peons) violate those regulations, while they violate them on a regular basis with impunity. It’s like in “Animal Farm,” where “some animals are better than others.” Politicians get a great sense of their own importance by the fact they were elected to office. They think that entitles them to more privileges than “ordinary folks.” Like Chicago Mayor Lightbrain, who went out and violated her own “lockdown” and got a haircut because she was “in the public eye,” which gave her certain perks, to which others were not entitled. Typical would-be dictator thinking. (Just common sense)

Rip Trump From White House

That’s what BLM thugs are planning to do (if they can). But I predict that, if they try, there will be fewer BLMers left to plague the world. They will have bitten off much more than they can chew. They are not trained in such things, and the Secret Service IS. And they’re well equipped to defend the White House and its occupants. That’s why there has never been a successful attack on the White House, and there isn’t going to be one, now. The BLM fools have enjoyed a measure of success up to now because they mostly choose “soft targets” that can’t effectively fight back, and they are supported by fool liberal politicians. Not so if they attack the White House. They will be up against a well-trained, well-equipped force that is “on the alert” 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Many of them will die, many others will go to prison for a long time. They will be “out of it.” I hope they try it. That will be a fitting end to a domestic terrorist bunch who didn’t know when they were outgunned, and outmatched. They will then be named as such and criminalized, subject to arrest and imprisonment, just for being a member. (Three Percenter Nation)

Anti-Gun Stupidity

I can’t believe the rampant stupidity that is represented by the anti-gun fool movement. Their very basic belief is stupid. They think, if they can “get rid of guns,” that will stop crime, altogether. They need to harken back to the middle ages, when the main weapon carried by bad guys and good guys alike was a knife or a sword. Crime was still rampant. Worse, in fact, than even today. They actually think they CAN “get rid of all guns.” But all their laws and regulations only apply to the LEGAL purchase and use of guns, which ignores the millions of ILLEGAL guns that are out there, in the hands of law-breakers. And there is NO WAY they can ever find, much less eliminate those millions of illegal guns. Nor stop the illegal sale of new guns to other law-breakers. Worse, their laws and regulations make it EASIER for the law-breakers to victimize the law-abiding, who DO obey their laws, even if they think they’re stupid. There’s one major flaw in their thinking: anti-gun laws only affect the law-abiding, while the law-breakers routinely ignore them and go right on victimizing the law-abiding. Law-breakers do not obey laws. That’s why they’re called law-breakers. So everything the anti-gun fools do is futile—IF you believe the phony reasons they give for wanting to disarm all Americans. Their real reason is obvious to intelligent people. They plan to come and take what is yours one day, and they want to be faced with as few guns as possible (Just common sense)

They're Gonna Be Surprised

Everything the liberal Dumbocrats want seems to be working out for them. Mostly because the liberal media suppresses any good information about Donald trump while similarly suppressing the BAD information about Joe Biden. Meanwhile, they send out thugs like those in ANTIFA and BLM to attack and even KILL those who support President Trump. So when pollsters come around and ask them their slanted questions, they LIE and tell them they’re against Trump, when they are actually his loyal supporters, but who fear being assaulted, even KILLED by Dumbocrat supporters for their loyalty to the president. I’m 83 years old and can barely walk. I don’t want to be assaulted by these thugs, so I would lie, too; to their faces. But when push comes to shove in the ballot box, I WILL vote for Donald Trump. So jail me. The Dumbocrats and their willing accomplices in the liberal media have painted a false picture of Biden’s non-existent chances to win this election, and they’re going to be very surprised when Trump wins, just like he did against all predictions, with Hillary. Hillary was a very bad candidate, but she was miles above Joe Biden. And Biden is going to “go down” fast on election day. (Just common sense)

"Tax the Rich"

That has always seemed to be the theme for liberal Dumbocrats. Mostly because they’re jealous at the fact that “the rich” have done better than they have, or that their constituents have. The fact that the rich have worked to EARN what they have escapes them. They figure everybody ought to be rich, even if they never do a day’s work in their lives. Yes, some of the rich stole, or conned their way to their riches. But they are a very small minority among the rich, most of whom are rich because they, or one of their forebears came up with an idea or a product that lots of people wanted to buy—and their constituents did not. NYC Mayor DiBlasio is begging New Yorkers to help him rob the rich. He’s very frightened by the fact that so many of them are taking their money and leaving, so he can’t steal part of what they have earned, so he won’t have as many “rich” left to rob. The “tax the rich” theme is a definite socialist/communist tactic to “even out” things between rich and poor, even if the poor did nothing to earn any part of it. It reveals the fact that the politician who proposes it IS a socialist/communist, at heart, even if he/she professes to be a free marketer. Socialism and communism are simply two different forms of collectivism. The only differences are cosmetic. (New York Post)

They'll Find a Way

Criminals are a resourceful lot. If you take away their guns (which, in itself, is an impossible dream), they’ll find a way. They’ll use a knife. Or a club. Or a tree limb. Anything with enough heft to put their victims down. The anti-gun fools think if they take the guns out of the picture they can eliminate crime. They’re wrong. There has been crime since one caveman hit another over the head with a club and stole his dinner. Taking away their tools doesn’t stop the law-breakers. They just find something else to use to victimize their victims. But the important thing to note is that “gun control” is NOT to stop crime. It is to HELP criminals. The ones who wear badges and come to take your property under color of law. And to better control YOU while they do it. Any politician who demands you give up your guns is suspect, and should never be elected to any office. Every despot in history, as one of the first things he (or she) did on taking power, was to make guns illegal for anybody but HIS/HER people. Hitler did it. Then went on to kill millions. Stalin did it, then murdered his own millions. Castro did it, and nobody knows how many innocent people he killed. Do you see a pattern here? Making guns illegal (except for those in the hands of the despot’s people) make their citizens defenseless against them. That’s the “bottom line” in gun control. It’s not about guns. It’s about control. Of YOU. (Just common sense)

"Enemies of the State"

Nancy Peelosi says Trump and his supporters are “enemies of the state.” But in reality, it is Nancy and the Dumbocrats who ARE “enemies of the state” because everything they propose to do (if they can steal the election, of course) is inimical to the needs, wishes, and requirements of America if we are to survive as a free nation. She is an ardent socialist, trying to destroy our free market heritage—a heritage that has made us the leader of the world, and the “destination of choice” for millions, all over the world. So much so, they’ll come here any way they can, legal or illegal—just so they can get here and enjoy all the benefits available here. Socialism alone will kill all that, but that’s not all she and her accomplices have in store for us. They want to destroy several important industries in the name of socialism. Like the coal industry, the electric industry, and the fossil fuel industry—all of which are essential to our survival as a free nation. She wants to, and has tried to, overthrow a legally elected president, just because she doesn’t like him, and he is about to expose her crimes while in office—something she can’t have happen. She and her accomplices have committed many crimes in their drive to “rid themselves” of this president, which is a crime, in itself, unless it is done by election—or impeachment, which she has already tried, and failed to accomplish. I wouldn’t rule out an assassination of the president and vice president, so she could “assume” the presidency. (Just common sense)

One of 99 Cities

Liberals argue that there have been riots and unrest in Republican-run cities, too, so the idea that most of them are caused by lousy governing only in Dumbocrat-run cities. But that’s not what we are saying, at all. We are saying that MOST of the unrest and violent riots come out of Dumbocrat-run cities—not that ALL do. If ONE city out of 99 that has riots and unrest is tun by Republicans, that changes nothing. And that’s about the right ratio—or worse. I don’t know of a Republican-run city where it is as bad as in Dumbocrat-run cities. If anybody knows of one, I’d love it if they’d tell me about it—with proof. I’m all about truth, after all. I LIVE in a Dumbocrat-run city (Denver). It isn’t as bad here as in, say, Chicago, but it does exist. I think this Dumbocrat mayor is a little smarter than most. In a recent riot in Denver, the cops made many arrests, which put a stop to the rioting—for a time, anyway. Colorado is mostly Republican—except in Denver, where this mayor gets a lot of “blowback” about his policies, which are contrary to that of the liberals in government, here. (Just common sense)

Pepper Spray: Big Seller

In Nevada, applications for gun license are BIG. So is the purchase of pepper spray for self defense. People enter a parking lot at night to go to their cars after a long day working in a casino, to meet a “bad guy.” Sometimes that guy has a gun, sometimes not. But the surprise given him when his intended victim temporarily blinds him is a good one (for the intended victim). Yes, yes, I know there are some people on whom pepper spray doesn’t work, but they are few and far between (I’m not one of them, and I can tell you that’s bad stuff!). Always use pepper spray responsibly. I cringe when I hear about a crook using it on his victims. But then I think that’s much better than being shot. But it is still a good method of self-defense and should not be abused so we can keep it legal, so foolish politicians don’t make laws against it as they do some places. (8 News NOW)

They Ignore That

George Floyd didn’t die because of a cop’s knee on his neck. He died of an overdose. He was already a dead man when that cop kneeled on his neck. His body just didn’t know it, yet. But will the “demonstrators” and the rioters who are damaging innocent people’s property, assaulting innocent people, and killing them back off? Not a chance. They will say the doctor performing the autopsy on Floyd’s body is “part of the conspiracy to cover up police responsibility in his death.” They will never accept that there ARE honest people who will not cooperate in a coverup. They will never accept that because they just don’t understand honest people because they are not honest, themselves. They will continue to “demonstrate” and riot, killing and maiming innocent people until they get tired of it and go home, or until some weak-kneed liberal politician gives them everything they want. Maybe that will satisfy them, and maybe it will not. Only time will tell. (Just common sense)

It Was Self Defense!

When are the insipid liberals running things going to realize that Kyle Rittenhouse was afraid for his life when he killed two men and injured another with his AR-15? If you had been knocked to the ground, had several men running toward you with “blood in their eyes” while others were shooting (maybe) at you and you don’t know if the shots were aimed at you, wouldn’t you start shooting? I certainly would, if I had a gun in my hands, and I’d be damned thankful I was still alive when it was all over. For the cops to charge him with two murders and one maiming is a travesty and an abuse of power. If the court upholds it and sends this kid, who is just beginning his life, to prison for the rest of his life for defending himself from violent rioters, that will just make the travesty worse. Yes, he shouldn’t have been out there with an AR-15. But he’s a 17-year-old kid who was not thinking straight. Should that have been worth a death sentence? That was what he feared as he shot those people. When a man who fears for his life is not allowed to defend himself, we are all doomed. (The Blaze)

"Turn In Your Guns!"

That’s what we hear all the time. Every time somebody shoots a gun at another, even if it’s in self defense, the anti-gun fools and their dupes start yelling about “getting guns off the streets.” Which is an “impossible dream.” There is NO WAY you are going to get every gun in existence “off the street.” Every law they make will only be obeyed by the law-abiding, who are not the problem, at all. The problem is the law-breakers, who just ignore them and go right on victimizing the law-abiding, who do obey their stupid laws. In New Zealand, they instituted a national “gun buyback” program after a major shooting. People only “turned in” a few guns. It was (and is) a big failure because New Zealanders are smarter than they thought. Fact is, any politician who demands you “turn in your guns” is just trying to get those guns out of your hands so he (or his minions) can victimize you later. If you do “turn in your guns,” you will be defenseless when they come for your property under color of law. That’s the way they want it. The basic purpose of every politician is TOTAL CONTROL over you. Gun control is just a part of it. (Just common sense)

They Never Give Details

Dumbocrats are well known for making wild accusations against Republicans, especially President Trump, without giving any specifics upon which they base those accusations. That’s because they’re trying to paint a picture of corruption, even though they have NO PROOF of any corruption, and they hope we don’t notice the lack of factual basis for their accusations. It’s a tactic they’ve used for a long time because it has been successful. But we are finally figuring out their scam, and it is being less successful as time goes on. But don’t expect them to learn anything soon. It takes them a while to learn from their mistakes—if they ever do. They’re always telling us what Trump is thinking without telling us how they know what he is thinking. The answer is, they don’t know what he is thinking. They just want us to think they do. They tell us about the things he’s supposed to be planning without telling us how they know it—because they DON’T know what he’s planning. They just want to plant their ideas in our minds. (Just common sense)

Crooks Running Things

There’s one thing deadly wrong with our system. That is that we have no way of keeping criminals out of positions of authority where they get to make the rules for the rest of us to follow (of course, they always exempt themselves). One good example is the Dumocrat drive for “Medicare for All!” Meanwhile, every Member of Congress has a health care service we can only dream about, and that’s without paying a penny for it. They voted it to themselves many years ago and keep adding to it. Then there are the politicians (mostly Dumocrats) who want to disarm all Americans so we’re helpless against their “minions” when they come for our property under “color of law.” Don’t believe it? Check out the RICO Laws, which allow them to arbitrarily decide that this large amount of money you diligently saved up to buy something was “probably” illegally obtained, and just TAKE it, without any court action first. And the agency that took it gets to use it as they wish. Today’s dollars are designed with a “strip” embedded that allows them to stand by the sidewalk (or whatever) and “scan you” to see if you’re carrying enough cash to make it worth it to rob you. Yes, you CAN sue to get it back—IF you have some money left to pay the lawyers—AFTER they take it. They’ll usually agree to give you SOME of it back, if you agree to let them keep the rest. They SAY the anti-gun laws are to “take guns off the streets.” What they are really for is to keep the political “minions” from meeting too many guns when they come to rob you. (Just common sense)

"No Legal Effect"

The Virginia Attorney General is now saying that those ubiquitous gun sanctuary resolutions “have no legal effect.” Seems to me they want to “have their cake and eat it, too.” Liberals agree with the “sanctuary city” movement when it supports something with which they agree—like illegal immigration creating more Dumocrat votes. But they then say a similar thing supporting something with which they do not agree is “not legal.” For my part, both are illegal as a matter of law. If a county sheriff doesn’t want to enforce unconstitutional laws, he has but to NOT do so. He doesn’t have to announce it. But a sanctuary city that will not obey the law MUST announce it, to tell the illegal aliens where they will be safe from ICE. Or reasonably safe. Looks like lawmaking to suit themselves, not to suit the law. It amazes me how politicians can twist the law to suit themselves. But in this case, they can’t. If a sheriff doesn’t want to enforce an unconstitutional law, he has but to not do it, and all the state can do is take him to court, where they will lose. (Virginia Mercury)

Racism: Big Business

Fear of racism is definitely “big business.” It even found its way onto a Formula One race car, way over there, in Spain. It’s foremost in the minds of every Dumbocrat politician there is—because they blame everything on it, whether it has anything to do with the problem, or not. To them, racism is rampant in this country—and it is, but not the kind they are pushing. It is the manufactured racism against WHITES they are pushing. It is the fastest-growing kind of racism there is in this country, because liberals are pushing it for all it’s worth. Every time they mention “white privilege” it’s like previous racists against black people talking about “keeping blacks in their place.” They want to make white people the “oppressed minority” in this country, and they are succeeding. Then you have stories in the news about blacks attacking white people for “their whiteness.” Sometimes. Mostly the liberal media refuses to report these stories because they don’t fit their narrative. But it has become evident to those of us with intelligence, that racism is their “go to” accusation when they have nothing else. (Just common sense)