It's Funny

How the weather is making the global warming fools look as stupid as they are. Today they have RECORD cold temperatures all over the Northeast, and in New York. A bunch of “global warming scientists” were stuck in the ICE in Antarctic, in the very place they predicted would be without ice by now. The world has not been “warming” for at least 15 years while they have been using this con to collect money from people all over the world. And they’re STILL using it, after changing the name of the swindle to “climate change” after the world became aware the globe was NOT “warming” and hadn’t been for a long time. And now Obama has fallen for it, or he sees it as yet another way to tighten his grip and con us out of more money. (Just common sense)

Hudak fights Back

Like most politicians, she doesn’t attack the substance of it. She tries to “shame” people into ignoring her bad decisions. And bad decisions are what caused the recall of two other members of Colorado’s legislature. She says it’s “wasting money.” It isn’t. What she and her fellow anti-gun fools do is “wasting money” by denying Colorado’s citizens of their right to self-defense and to own and carry the means to that self-defense, a gun. Hudak said, “"I'm disappointed that these extreme interest groups feel the need to waste our taxpayer dollars on another costly, manipulative recall process," she said(But she resigned, rather than "face the music). "This just isn't the way that our government should function." - Sen. Evie Hudak. These people"are NOT "extreme interest groups." They are in the MAJORITY or they wouldn't have successfully recalled two previous legislators.  But is IS the way our government should work: getting rid of those who would deny us our constitutional rights as expeditiously as possible so they can do less damage. This recall effort, in view of the previous successes, must be very frightening to Hudak. Would that we could do the same to Obama before he ruins us. (Hold Them Accountable)

Still Can't Afford It

What part of “can’t afford it” does Obama not understand about health insurance? I have NEVER been able to afford health insurance. Making a LAW to FORCE me to buy it isn’t going to change that, nor is fining me for NOT buying it. Furthermore, “insurance” with “deductibles” as high as $12,000 is not insurance, at all. It is a “money-gathering scheme.” Add to that two to three times as high a premium as I would have been paying before (IF I could afford it) is the work of a FOOL if he really thought it would help. Add to that the “two-tier medical system” like that in Cuba where good medicine is “available,” but only to Castro and others who have MONEY and you have a scam that is going to RUIN the medical profession in the U. S. A. But that's what he wants, so things are going well for him. (Just common sense)

How Many Times?

The question of the century: How many times must socialism (in all its forms) fail before our gullible politicians get the idea? Russia tried it. Communism and socialism are two slightly different forms of collectivism, which is governed by this maxim: “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED.” Anybody with any intelligence who reads that should understand that collectivism is TAKING from the producer of new wealth and giving that taken to the DRONES of society. It DEPENDS on the PRODUCTIVE to earn the money and buy the property coveted by those who, for whatever their reason, will NOT earn for themselves. Moreover, how many more times must I write this before the average AMERICAN gets it? OBAMA is the proudest promoter of socialism today, though he won’t admit it, while admitting it. Joe the Plumber accused him of being a socialist during an election campaign and he said, “No, I’m not a socialist; I just want to spread the wealth around.” That’s the DEFINITION of socialism and he’s too dumb to understand it! Therefore, he is INCOMPETENT. Countries all over the world are going bankrupt because of their practice of various forms of collectivism, and STILL they don’t get it. (American Thinker)

"Women's Guns"

Many gun makers have funny ideas concerning what women want in guns. Some think they just need to be small. But small guns aren’t the kind with stopping power, and that’s what they need. Some make guns with pink handles. They think pink guns are what women want. That’s a sexist thought. Women aren’t any more fond of the color pink than anybody else, breast cancer activists notwithstanding. What they want is a gun that can STOP an attacker; a gun that is “an equalizer,” that makes up for their smaller size and lesser strength. A .22 isn’t going to do it. A .38 might. Yes, larger guns kick more. But they can get used to that through practice. Pink does not do it. (Shooting Illustrated)

The Gift That Keeps On Giving (Again)

That’s how I describe Joe Biden’s stupid mouth. He has a positive TALENT for gaffes, which the “usual suspects” in the media typically ignore. In China, he asked working women, “Do your husbands like your working?” What an incredibly STUPID remark. Did you hear about it on ABC, CBS, or NBC? Doubtful. They ignored it completely, preferring to concentrate on his “don’t accept the status quo” remarks. What kind of a kerfluffle would result if a REPUBLICAN made such remarks? This shows admirably the left leaning of the media in America.  America doesn’t need the government to censor things; the media does it admirably itself. (Media Research Center)

Michelle: $10 "Donations"

Michelle Obama is now asking for $10 donations to help sell Obamacare (If it's so great, why do they need to collect extra money to “sell” it?). Just one day before Obama's “State of the Coup…er, uh, Union” speech to Congress, she has mounted an e-mail campaign among supporters to “protect Obamacare.” In it, she rails against insurance companies “discriminating against” people with pre-existing conditions. She doesn’t tell you how STUPID eliminating that “discrimination” is, as it makes Obamacare no longer “insurance,” but welfare. It’s a socialist concept: the “masses” paying for YOUR health insurance. Socialists really think that’s the right thing to do, although they eliminate payments for things that preceded you buying insurance to keep from going bankrupt, since then you would be able to be diagnosed with, say, cancer, and THEN buy “insurance” to pay all those expensive hospital, doctor and medicine costs. (Washington Examiner)

Shooters Are All Democrats

Didja notice? ALL of the “mass shooters” in recent years (I don’t know about earlier) have been Democrats or liberals. Does this tell you something about how they think, even if only a few act on it? In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln; in 1881, a left-wing radical shot and killed James Garfield; in 1963 a left-wing radical killed John Kennedy, and he was, himself, a Democrat. In 1975 a Democrat shot at Gerald Ford, and missed; in 1983 a Registered Democrat tried to kill Ronald Reagan. And those are just the PRESIDENTS shot by Democrats. ALL the “mass shooters” in recent years proved to be Democrats. Not a Republican, a Tea Party member, NRA member, or any other kind of conservative was ever involved in such a shooting. And Democrats say WE are the “enemy?” Maybe we need to make a law denying the right to carry a gun specifically aimed at DEMOCRATS and other liberals. Give 'em some of their own medicine. (Just common sense)

Security Nonexistent

Have you gone to Obama’s health care web site? Have you given up all your personal information? Right. That info is now on the “open market” and can be used to “become you” and rip you off. The security on this web site is “non-existent.” I predict that identity theft will become a multi-billion dollar industry in the near future with Obama's help. The incompetence shown in building this web site is mind-blowing! Better to pay a piddling “fine” (tax) rather than take a chance on losing your credit to identity thieves. To make it worse there is NO requirement to “vet” Obama’s “navigators,” so you might be giving your private info directly into the hands of a felon who WILL “rip you off” or sell the info to other criminals. (Fox News)

How Stupid ARE We?

In Iowa, they’re whomping up a campaign to have Hillary Clinton run for president again. Are we really that stupid? One Clinton was enough, even before Benghazi. That aside, what has she ever done that was good? She was appointed by her hubby during his presidency to come up with a health care plan like the abortion Obama foisted upon us and she couldn’t. Obama appointed her secretary of state and she couldn’t even handle THAT job. Like Obama, she believes in socialism and will further his attempt to socialize this country. And then she was complicit in the MURDERS of four embassy people in Benghazi, having been WARNED that an attack was eminent, she REDUCED their security against their pleas for MORE security. Then, when the predicted attack was in process, she told rescue parties who were ready to go, and who COULD have reached there in time, maybe saving some lives, to “stand down.” She is NOT “presidential material.” To elect her would be a “third term” for both her husband AND Obama. Then there’s Joe. If anybody thinks Joe won’t make his own try, they need to think again. Democrats have lied Sarah Palin into ignominity and have done the same to several other viable Republican candidates. And Republicans have allowed it because they're afraid of them, too. I don’t know who the Republicans will put up, but I’ve heard some pretty fool suggestions over there. When are we going to “wise up” and elect a COMPETENT candidate to the presidency? Are we going to continue to elect socialist after socialist and HOPE they’ll “change their spots?” (Just common sense)

Rocker Criticizes "Gun People"

“Pearl Jam’s” Eddie Vedder criticizes pro-gun people for ”hiding behind the Second Amendment.” So what should they do? Let Obama and his friends disarm hem and leave them defenseless against ILLEGALLY armed criminals (some even wearing badges)? Should they let the government take away their right to self-defense? And that’s what it really amounts to. Does Vedder have armed guards protecting him? I’ll bet he does. All these people who can afford to HIRE guns to protect them think they are so far above us “common folk” they can criticize us for not wanting to allow government to take away our rights. This guy is a FOOL and is advertising it to the world. This fool should stick to making “music”—IF he’s even good at that. With the kind of “music” there is today, I seriously doubt it. Just like the kind of “gun laws” they make today do NOTHING to stop gun violence, but instead, INCREASE it by disarming innocent people. He’s too dumb to realize that, but dumb people are usually too dumb to know how dumb they are. (AmmoLand)

Texas didn't Kill Kennedy

When a sniper took aim and blew President John Kennedy’s brains all over the back of the front seat of that open limousine that day, he “changed the world,” according to legend. That happened in Dallas, Texas and many attribute that killing to Texas. They’re wrong: Texas didn’t kill Kennedy, somebody who hated him, rightly or wrongly, killed Kennedy. Kennedy’s POLICIES killed Kennedy, but his death has long been blamed on the State of Texas. His death has spawned a “cottage industry” making a LOT of money for people arguing about whether his death was due to ONE SHOOTER or several. The “Warren Commission, after much talk and spending much money, decided it was. It may or may not have been. But Texas didn’t kill Kennedy, WASHINGTON did. My money is on Johnson. I had my own problems with Kennedy’s policies. They were the subjects of the FIRST pamphlet I wrote to comment on political actions (in the sixties), entitled, “I Am An Extremist!” It detailed the many things about which I was extremely angry” and lampooned the extremists who called ME an extremist for them. But my objections to his policies didn’t rise to the level of wishing him dead. Today, many have decided there WAS, in fact, a second shooter; that Oswald was a lousy shot and missed THREE times, leaving it necessary for a second shooter to fire the lethal shot and get he job done (I still find it hard to imagine Oswald as a Marine).

We will never know because the “investigation” into the Kennedy killing was one of the worst botched “investigations” in memory (maybe that was on purpose). Evidence was altered, the very AUTOPSY done on his body is said to have been botched, and the only man who really KNEW if there was a second shooter was MURDERED by (Jack Ruby) a man who had some strange “friendships” among government people, before he could be properly questioned. Yes, his murder did change many things: for one, the president has never paraded around in an open limousine since. Presidential security has increased considerably. Kennedy was a liberal, as liberals were known then. Some of his policies would have made today’s politicians call him a conservative. One of those was to LOWER the tax base and by so doing INCREASE the “tax take,” an action repeated by one of his successors, Ronald Reagan, with similar results, almost DOUBLING the “tax take” in the following years until liberals managed to raise it significantly since, thus LOWERING “the tax take,” while bemoaning that decrease without ever admitting it was THEIR ACTIONS that had done it. Even though most of Kennedy’s actions WERE liberal, this is just ONE that I would have heartily approved of, though I was not yet sufficiently knowledgeable to know that at the time.

I disapproved of his actions toward Cuba, including his attempt to kill Castro, though I am not, and never will be a Castro supporter. I merely thought his action in APPROVING the “Bay of Pigs invasion, then “pulling our support out,” leaving his troops to die, and creating a situation where we had to pay a LOT of money (and tractors) to get some of his prisoners released, though he and other politicians denied that ever happened. There were other things to which I objected, but I will not enumerate them here. Yes, I’ve been observing politics that long, and things have not gotten better since. In fact they have gotten “progressively” worse. Terminally worse, in my opinion, and that leads me to wonder why Barack Obama is still alive. Maybe it’s because only a right-winger would want to kill him and only leftists do that (maybe it is the specter of Joe Biden as president that is good insurance against assassination). They tried to convince the world Kennedy was killed by a right-winger when it happened (as usual). But it was not to be, since Oswald (his presumed killer) was a “dedicated leftist and known communist,” which somehow could NOT be hidden from the world. Progressivism (communism) was in decline then, and they started calling themselves LIBERALS to fool us. Liberalism is now KNOWN to be a “cover” for those who wish this country to be a COLLECTIVIST (communist, socialist, etc.) nation. Progressivism has regained its prominence as an “alternate name” for communism since its real definition (communist) has been forgotten.

Yes, Kennedy’s murder did “change the world,” but not for the better, because politicians have so messed things up since. We have slipped ever closer to becoming the “Soviet Union” of the 21st Century as politicians work tirelessly to create a “collectivist (socialist) society.” Obama is the “front man” of that effort, having been BORN to communist parents, RAISED as a communist, schooled by communists, and mentored by communists. How could he be ANYTHING but a communist in his thinking, even if he might not be a “card-carrying member” of the communist party. It is his collectivist THINKING that counts, reinforced, as it has been by his communist mentors over the years after his communist upbringing. His support for Muslims, however, is strange, if you didn’t know that Islam has ALSO been a big part of his upbringing, having been born (whether he will admit it or not) in a Muslim country and raised in Muslim schools (that part is proven). It would be amazing to me if he WEREN’T a Muslin sympathizer. All that aside, it is his ACTIONS that tell me he is both a collectivist (socialist) and a Muslim sympathizer who would make this country REPLACE RUSSIA as a collectivist “showcase nation” for a while, until it collapses of its own weight, as did Soviet Russia. Collectivist nations can NEVER survive for long because they produce NOTHING and eliminates incentive to produce. Russia survived longer than it would have if it didn't have America’s financial support.

Communism and socialism DEPEND on the labor of those capable and WILLING to earn for themselves to provide money and property to steal and redistribute to others, who are NOT “producers.” Collectivism destroys INCENTIVE, which is NECESSARY for progress, and that will kill collectivism in this country ultimately, as it did in Russia, though probably not in my lifetime. I am glad I am as old as I am (76), and will not live to see most of what is coming. But I am sad to know that my progeny will. I have tried my best to stop it from happening, but I fear I’ve failed. So I will just have to watch it happening until my time comes, which I fear will not be long, with Obama controlling the health profession in his ignorance. (Just common sense)

Walker Saved Wisconsin

Scott Walker wanted to “drown the unions in the bath” to revive Wisconsin and balance the budget, using conservative principles. The people agreed with him, and they elected him governor. The unions fought back and even tried to recall him. He won. He "slapped them down." Then things went kinda “quiet” for a while, while he worked. The state now boasts a $911 million SURPLUS, something unheard of in Democrat (liberal) administrations. Unemployment is at 6.2%, the lowest it has been since 2008. This is what the liberals feared most. Conservative values doing what they’ve NEVER been able to do with their “spend to succeed” ideas. That means a complete blackout in the American press about him and his work. That’s why this story is only in the British press. The American media keep saying he wouldn’t be a good possibility for president, but I disagree. He has done what no Democrat (liberal) has ever been able to do because of incompetence, and I think he could do it again as “commander-in-chief.” (The Telegraph)

Colo. Prosecutor Refuses to Prosecute

Apparently not being as “anti-gun” as some prosecutors, he refused to prosecute people whose homes were damaged in the recent Colorado floods under Hickenlooper’s overly broad law when they stored their guns at their friend or relative’s home while their own homes were repaired. This wide open law would allow him to prosecute those people for “illegal gun transfer” if they did it. But an INTELLIGENT prosecutor would not prosecute people under this law, and he didn’t. Other prosecutors, being “anti-gun,” would jump at the chance. Hick needs to get this law changed to reflect reality, but will he? I doubt it. He’s an anti-gun Democrat, after all. (NRA-ILA)

Obama Wants Free Spending

He thinks the limits on spending are an “obstacle,” and, as with most emperors, he wants them simply eliminated. He has had mostly an unlimited supply of money to spend since he was elected, never having filed a budget, as required by law. He had a little problem last year when the Congress objected to continuing to raise his debt limit time after time, but that was solved when Republicans “caved.” But Obama wants no such “problems” in the future. He wants the REMOVAL of the debt ceiling so there are NO OBSTACLES to him spending as much as he wants, whether or not we have any REAL money left. He thinks he doesn’t have a “spending problem,” but he does, even if he’s too ignorant to notice. We need to stop giving him all the money he wants to spend, or he will just spend even more. Otherwise, we need to get rid of this spendthrift president. (Western Center for Journalism)

Only In New York

We get rid of one mayor who fancies himself a dictator, banning everything he doesn’t like and going right on to a third term, even though the law says he can’t, which makes him a mini-Obama, ignoring the law (and the electorate let him do it), to a mayor who is a COMMUNIST (he calls it “progressive”), which is another name for communist”. New Yorkers deserve what they get when they stupidly elect such people. They bi-ch and moan about high taxation and the high cost of living and high prices, but they keep electing fools such as these two. Will they EVER put “two and two together” and realize that as long as liberals run their city AND their state, it’s going to continue? Some people think there's no way they couldn't know. But dedicated New Yorkers don't think the same way as human beings do. They make no connection between the liberal politicians running things and the reasons why they're in such misery. Detroiters still haven't learned it, and they're bankrupt. (The Blaze)

He Made A "Cutting Remark"

A deli clerk pulled a machete on an armed robber who tried to rob his store, and the robber didn’t shoot him. He must not have had any bullets. The clerk’s actions weren’t too smart if the robber’s gun HAD been loaded. But they were effective. The robber fled. They say he fired a shot, but I couldn’t see it in the video. The clerk, who was obviously very mad, chased the robber all the way across the parking lot. He may be still running. I’d bet he doesn’t try to rob this deli again after he cleans out his pants. (4New York)

Thank Obama

Not for what you’d think. The “bottom is falling out” of his polling numbers as well as those of the Democrat Party because of ObamaCare. The ”sleeping giant” that is America is “waking up,” due to the stupidities reflected in ObamaCare and the 2014 election is in danger for them. Even the news media is turning on him (slightly, but more is to come). The late night comedians are now “taking him on” in their monologues. He has massively overplayed his hand with ObamaCare and MILLIONS of Americans are out of work and can’t get any. They’re not used to this, and they know who needs to be blamed: Obama and the Democrats, no matter how hard he tries to blame Republicans. So thank you, Obama, for going too far and waking people up to the foolishness embodied in liberalism (socialism). We applaud you for that, if nothing else. (Just common sense)

Liberals Tell You Who They Fear

Not knowingly, but they do. They do it by trying hard to destroy the object of their fear. A good example is what they did to Sarah Palin; and what they’re STILL trying to do to the Tea Parties. The “Tea Party” is not an organized group with 501 (c)3 tax exemption (though there ARE some Tea Party groups who are). It's a n "umbrella" to say what they stand for. They are a bunch of INDIVIDUALS who are OUTRAGED by what the liberals, led by Obama, are doing to them and their way of life. Look at what they’re (liberals, not the Tea Parties) trying to do to Allen West, who is still a viable presidential candidate; or Gov. Christie, whose STAFF did something stupid, MAYBE with his knowledge. They DESTROYED Mitt Romney. They couldn’t find anything bad about him, so they just lied about him. They HATE Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and Rush Limbaugh because they are the LEADERS in the radio opposition to them.

They get a lot of truth out there, so they MUST go. There are many viable possible candidates to run for president in 2016; too many to mention here. But you can tell who they are by what Democrats say about them. Rick Santorum and the Pauls, father and son. Newt Gingrich, but they don’t worry much about him any more. They dispensed with him in the primaries in 2012. There are still more, whose names I can’t even remember now. Obama says his popularity is slipping because he’s black. But what about Allen West and the other black Republican candidates Democrats have lied about. The point is, you can always tell who frightens them the most, by how many negative things they say about them, not just before an election, but all the time. You can count on it. (Just common sense)

Why I'll Never "Sign Up"

I’m probably not eligible for Obama’s health care swindle anyway, because I’m on Social Security and Medicare (I couldn’t get out of it). But even if I were, I would not sign up for it. The first reason is, I can’t afford it. “What part of ‘can’t afford it’ don’t you understand, Obama?” Next, if I couldn’t afford it before, now that my costs would be DOUBLED or even more, I STILL can’t afford it, and would never “buy a pig in a poke.” Then there’s the REQUIREMENT that I buy it through a “broken-down” web site that doesn’t work, and never WILL work that requires all my personal information FIRST, before I even get to “shop” the plans available and “signs me up” for any plan I so much as ASK about; then it will not let me reverse that. Meanwhile my personal information is available to any identity thief who wants it because there are NO security safeguards. NO, there are too many negatives here, and anybody who doesn’t want to be swindled, either by Obama OR other kinds of identity thieves (he's probably got a deal with ID thieves), should STAY AWAY. And tell them to stick their fines in the usual place, sideways. (Just common sense)