Liberals Hate A Winner

And they love a loser. One football team won the Super Bowl by a score of 48 to 8 and they whine about “bullying.” That actually happened to the Denver Broncos, but did they whine about losing so badly? NO. They set out to BE the winner at the next Super Bowl. But liberals criticize the Sea Hawks for “bullying” the Broncos. What a LOAD that is! Kid’s teams lose by big margins all the time. They want to have SCORELESS GAMES so as not to “humiliate” the loser. So what? If a team (or an individual) isn’t ready for the game, they shouldn’t play it. They SHOULD be “humiliated.” Sorry about that. If they can’t make themselves good enough to win, or even lose closely, they shouldn’t be IN the game. Liberals PROMOTE MEDIOCRITY. Their entire BEING is to promote mediocrity.

Can you imagine an auto race without a winner? The whole purpose of a sport is to decide a winner. The AMOUNT by which he wins makes no difference. I remember one race where the winner won by more than one lap over second. Another where the winner came back from THREE LAPS DOWN to win, convincingly. How about a boxing match with no winner? Can you think of anything more STUPID? But this is what liberals promote. In a “Pee-Wee” football game where the adults refuse to keep score, you can bet the KIDS know who won, and by exactly how  much. Not keeping score is the act of a FOOL, and that’s what liberals want in ALL things. That’s so they won’t have to work too hard to “feel good” about themselves. It’s the same thing in life. They want to “level the playing field” so it’s easier for them to win with someone else doing the work. But is a win under those conditions a real win? When you handcuff your opponent as they want to do, are you REALLY a winner? NO. You’re a PRETEND winner, but liberals are happy with that because they know they aren’t good enough to win unless their opponents are handcuffed. (Just common sense)