"Suspicions Remain"

Dumocrats can’t say their “suspicions” are true, but they want the world to think that, just because they “suspect” something, there has to be something to it. They “suspect” that Trump “might” have colluded with the Russians to win the election, even though facts alone deny that would be true. The Russians would clearly prefer Hillary over Trump because she is a socialist, a system of which they approve. They would not prefer Trump because he is a dedicated free marketer (that they call a “capitalist” in an insulting manner) and is the farthest from their ideal imaginable. But in spite of logic (which liberals insist does not exist—logically) they want us to believe that a socialist country, run by socialist people, would prefer a dedicated free marketer over a dedicated socialist. They’re forced to say “In two years of searching under every rock, we could not find any evidence of that collusion, there remains a SUSPICION that the collusion exists, and so we pursue an “investigation” into it, which should, alone, be treated as prima facie evidence of his collusion. The fact that those “suspicions” are UNFOUNDED doesn’t seem to matter to liberals. They want you to treat their “suspicions” as fact. And their very “investigation” is “hanging over Trump’s head,” and that should be considered “evidence” it is true. (Just common sense)