John Roberts IS "The Slave Judge"

Chris Matthews says Judge Roberts doesn’t want to be the “slave judge” who was vilified for the rest of his life after being the “swing vote” to uphold the “Fugitive Slave Act.” He has, in fact, done exactly that. He has made slaves of all Americans in an effort not to offend Obama by “siccing” the IRS on us if we don’t buy health insurance, even if we CAN’T afford it. I repeat: “What part of ‘I can’t afford it’ don’t you understand, Obama?” Does he really think making a LAW will change that? What a FOOL we have stupidly elected president. I hope America is smart enough to fix that in November. (Media Research Center)

AG Holder Still Protesting

He’s been found in contempt of Congress. He’s still talking about a “witch hunt.” What he needs to do is realize that he did something wrong and he’s been caught. He needs to react accordingly and resign while other people do what he refused to do and give Congress the information they need to find out what REALLY happened, and who is responsible. People have DIED because of his actions, and he apparently doesn’t care. Nor does his boss, Obama. They tried to cover it up, and failed. This scandal should SINK Obama, as a much simpler one (where nobody died) did Nixon. (The Blaze)

No, It Will NOT!

There’s a “Global Caliphate Conference” in Chicago (Obama’s home town) that was cancelled after major protests against it. They still say “Sharia WILL rule the world!” How cocky are they? Sharia is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and there is NO WAY we are going to get rid of our Constitution without a fight! Thus, there is NO WAY Sharia Law will EVER “rule” in America. They might get a small number of decisions that MIGHT conform to Sharia Law, but such decisions will REMAIN few and far between. Sharia Law will NEVER “gain a foothold” here, and those who think it will are FOOLS. (The Blaze)

How Islam Worms Its Way Into Our Government

Hillary hired a former high-ranking member of the Muslim Brotherhood (an organization that has been determined to be a terrorist organization BY our government) as a member of her STAFF. How many other such staff appointments have been QUIETLY made by members of this administration? Soon such staff members will be quietly instituting Sharian Law principles into our legal system and we will not know about it until those principles are being enforced. Then it will be too late. (Front Porch Politics)

What's Wrong With Legalizing Drugs?

The “drug war” has been a colossal failure. All it has done is give the government an excuse to make more and more laws, some of them even unconstitutional, to “fight the war on drugs” while drug dealers and drug cartels keep right on supplying drugs to weak-minded Americans. It has done NOTHING to stop, or even SLOW DOWN the flow of drugs into our schools (right down to grade schools) and our neighborhoods. Being “illegal” forces prices high enough to ensure a huge profit, enough to make it profitable to push onto even tiny children, who must steal from their parents to buy them. What is the result? There are MORE people abusing drugs now than there were when it started. Those wishing to KEEP the “war on drugs” going say people who want to legalize drugs (like me) just want to keep the drugs coming. That’s the words of a fool. I’ve NEVER used drugs. I’m probably the last person on earth who has no idea what marijuana tastes like (though I DO know what it smells like, after 18 years as a paramedic, scraping addicts off the streets).

I have lost TWO of my children to drugs, (one to booze AND drugs, the other to an overdose) so don’t you DARE tell me I’m somebody who wants the flow of drugs to continue. What I DO want is for somebody to find a good SUBSTITUTE, one that will DO what the “war on drugs” was designed to do: STOP the flow of drugs. Legalizing them will force the price down to the point where the drug cartels and your local drug dealers won’t see enough profit to make the risk in selling them worthwhile. People will criticize me for this, but to them I say, “Do you have anything better?” Something that will WORK? The “war on drugs” certainly hasn’t worked, and has created a lot of violence in addition to killing off their own customers, but they don't care, there are enough new customers to make up the difference. So why should we keep doing the same thing over and over and hoping for a different result? That’s the definition of crazy. Are we crazy? (Raw Story)

Obama Fighting to NOT Enforce Laws

What is it with this president? He does everything he can to PREVENT enforcement of our immigration laws, even to the point of SUING states to prevent THEM from doing so, since he won’t. In the case cited in this article, he is suing to stop an egg farmer from requiring identification from its employees so it can make sure it is not hiring illegal aliens (which could get HIM in jail). This is just one incident in his efforts to destroy our ability to find illegal aliens. What is he trying to do? This egg farmer is just trying to follow the law and he’s getting sued by the federal government, which has unlimited funds at its disposal to support its suit—while the egg farmer does not. This follows Obama’s suing Florida to stop them from purging their voter rolls of illegal or DEAD voters. They’re doing the same in Minnesota so we can’t know if a comedian was actually elected Senator, or STOLE the election. (Courier-Journal)

Iran's Incompetence

The leaders in Iran, like the leaders in America and almost everywhere else, are incompetent. Their latest stupid statement is this: “Accept our terms—or else.” Or else, what? You’ll send your entire nuclear arsenal, both bombs (or maybe just one), to some city you think you can reach, and hope you’ll still be in existence 30 minutes later? That our current wimpy “leaders” will say, “Oh, well,” and try to “talk to you” again? I admit with Obama in office, your theory MIGHT hold water. But I guarantee you if you do it and Obama doesn’t eliminate Iran from existence, he will DEFINITELY go down to an ignominious defeat in November while we find a president who WILL. The upshot is, Iran will soon cease to exist, even if Obama hasn’t the guts. (Just common sense)

Reading The Constitution

The Gun Owners of America were responsible for a congressman actually READING the Constitution of the United States in Congress. A document everybody on that floor should already be familiar with, but are not. I don’t know how many congresspeople sat there and read something else, or just ignored it—or how many just walked out, but at least they were given an OPPORTUNITY to hear the document that SHOULD be controlling their actions. Whether or not they did is in question. (Just common sense)

Famous Racists In History

Democrats like to paint Republicans as racists. There is only one problem with that: most of the famous racists down through history have been Democrats. The list has to be topped by Sen. Robert Byrd, a former high-ranking Klan member, Joining him has to be Jesse Jackson (one of his famous racist statements was to call New York City “Hymietown”), Al Sharpton, and (Calypso Louie) Farrakhan, though their racism is against white people. Byrd would probably chafe at being on the same list as those three, but that’s racism, isn’t it? FDR was a bigot and his biggest act of bigotry was against innocent Japanese, whom he imprisoned, just because they WERE Japanese during the second World War. Democrat Jimmy Byrnes was a close confidante of Roosevelt, and almost became Vice President. Then there’s Hugo Black, a former Klan member who became a Supreme Court member. Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-SC), Rep. Dick Gephart (D-MO), Andrew Cuomo, Clinton’s former Housing Secretary, and Mary Frances Barry, who was appointed head of the U. S. commission on Civil Rights, fergawd’ssake! J. William Fulbright (D-AR), Clinton’s mentor, Albert Gore, Sr (he opposed the Civil Rights Act). Sam Ervin(D-SC), and so many more I haven’t room to even list their names. And they say the Republicans are the racists! What a load of BS! (GOP Capitalist)

"Islamaphobe"

This is a made-up term to make people believe the very act of disliking Islamic terrorists is, somehow, a mental aberration. It is not. Like a similar term that came before it, “Homophobe,” it is designed to blunt criticism without the bother of making an argument. This is phoniness personified. Call me what you want, it doesn’t make it so. Another made-up term designed to blunt criticism without the bother of making an argument is “birther,” which Obamma came up with to avoid answering questions about his eligibility to BE president because of his foreign birth. This is the liberals’ method to avoid answering “sticky questions” they can’t answer by making the questioner stop asking the questions while defending against the names they’re being called. (Just common sense)

Another Stupid Actress

Amanda Bynes got arrested for DUI and wants OBAMA to “fire the cop who arrested her.” Doesn’t she know Obama has no power to do that? Does she think Obama is a dictator who can fire a cop for doing his duty? How stupid is this broad? She says, “I don’t drink.” But it seems to me the cop saw something that made him think she was drunk or he wouldn’t have arrested her. They don’t just go out and say, “Who can we arrest wrongly today?” Anyway, she thinks the president can fire him, and WILL, just because she asks him to do it. How much of a FOOL is she? Maybe she's going by Obama doing so many things he hasn't the power to do, with no retribution. (Reuters)

No Cooperation At All

The “Twister-In-Chief, Jay Carney, says Holder and the DOJ “have cooperated with Congress.” They have not. They have spent MONTHS “stonewalling” on “Fast & Furious” while attempting still to throw all the blame for their problems AND "Fast & Furious" onto Bush and the Republicans. They say they have sent 7,600 documents in response to Congress' “demands.” They have not. They have created a “document dump” of thousands of documents that have nothing to do with what Congress asked for. Something to waste their time and advance the investigation not at all. Holder is an expert at deflecting questions with 50,000 word essays that do not address the questions asked. He has been rightly designated in contempt of Congress. But will it stick? Doubtful. Obama will come up with SOMETHING to “make it go away.” He’s good at twisting things like that. (The Hill)

Jerkson Wants to Get Rid of Guns

Like many liberals, Jesse Jerkson wants to get rid of guns entirely. He can’t even CONCEIVE of the fact that it can’t be done, not the fact that even if it COULD, you would not eliminate violence. First of all, CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING, will NOT obey one that says they can’t be armed. And if we were miraculously successful in eliminating ALL guns, criminals would find something else with which to attack others. Like back in the days when everybody who could afford one carried a sword, while those who couldn’t were their victims or just used clubs. Violent people WILL do violence, if they have to use a club. I can’t believe so many otherwise intelligent people (Jerkson excepted) can’t understand this. (The Blaze)

The Coverup Continues

To avoid a “contempt of Congress” citation, our criminal president, now a KILLER president, granted Attorney General Holder “Executive Privilege” over the documents Congress has subpoenaed, so as to cement the coverup over his OWN involvement in the death of a Border Patrol member. The only thing that can save this president from impeachment is the lack of sufficient time left in his tenure to get it done. He WILL be impeached, in the best way possible: by the vote of the people. He still displays “unshakable confidence” in his ability to get re-elected. But I think he and his accomplices are “shaking in their boots” because they KNOW they’re all going to be fired in November. (The Blaze)

Wisconsin Is A USA Microcosm

This “recall election” that was won by the governor in Wisconsin is a microcosm of what is going on all over the United States. Alexis De Tocqeville (French political thinker and historian) said, "The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can bribe the people with their own money." And that is exactly what is happening in Wisconsin AND America. In Wisconsin they tried to get rid of a Republican governor who kept his promise to bring the budget under control, but the people didn’t like how he did it. He did it by getting rid of many of the “giveaway programs” they had come to think of as their right. This is how we got such a “free-spender” as Obama, who is in the process of “giving away the store.” If Obama is re-elected, it will be an illustration of the truth of this statement. Even though the Wisconsin governor was NOT recalled, just the move to recall him is evidence of the truth of this statement. (United States History)

Killing the Goose...

Obama seems set on “killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.” Liberals (including Obama) are fundamentally incompetent; they hate the very things that FUEL this economy. They hate PROFIT, first of all, which is what keeps the economy moving. Without profits, there is no money for the government to STEAL and “redistribute” to their friends and contributors. They hate all the “big corporations,” whose profits keep this society moving while they (big and small corporations and businesses) CREATE JOBS; something Obama claims to do, but doesn’t. He can’t, except by creating an atmosphere that allows those big corporations, as well as smaller companies, to do so. Government DOES NOT create new wealth; private enterprise does. Government STEALS the profits EARNED by private enterprise under the FREE MARKET. But liberals HATE the free market and want to put CHAINS on it while STEALING as much money it can from the people engaged in it. Does anybody with any intelligence at all wonder why THE WORLD is going bankrupt?

That’s easy: the world is mostly run by liberals (socialists), who are experts at “getting elected,” but not at much else. France, for instance, is bankrupt because of their socialist programs. And when their president cut back on them, which the French had come to view as their right, they got rid of him and elected a socialist, who would continue the programs that PUT them into bankruptcy. Many other European countries are bankrupt and the European Union is about to fail because of similar socialist programs. The “Euro” (the money of the European Union) is about to disappear. This is all because of the INCOMPETENCE of the liberals running things, all of whom regard SOCIALISM in one form or another as “the way to go.” This is their main incompetence and if they're allowed to continue to run things, will cause the entire WORLD to “go under.” This is what Obama wants to bring to us. (Just common sense)

Is It Beginning?

Thugs beat homeowner who removed Democrat election signs that were placed in his yard (on his personal property) without his permission. Is this the kind of thuggism we can expect from Democrats as the 2012 election goes forward? This smacks of the actions that are taken by desperate-to-win politicians. It also interests me that these thugs have not yet (as this writing) been “brought to justice.” Are the “authorities” in that area mostly Democrat? Will they really “investigate” this case in ANY case? Or will they call it “a political dispute” and ignore it? As a blogger who is DEFINITELY not liberal, will I someday be the subject of such a beating? And if so, will ANYBODY in Democrat-dominated Denver, Colorado do anything about it? (Gateway Pundit)

Socialism NEEDS The Free Market

Socialists say they HATE the free market, or “capitalism,” as they call it derisively. But what they don’t say is socialism NEEDS the free market in order to have earned money they can steal so as to survive. Without the money EARNED by people in the free market, socialists have no money or property to STEAL and “redistribute.” That’s a question they never answer: “Where does the money come from under socialism?” That’s because they can’t. They just start calling you names. Socialism is a system that emphasizes mediocrity. They want “a fair share for everyone,” even those who can’t (or won’t) earn for themselves. Yes, it’s right to help those who CAN’T help themselves because of old age or illness, or infirmity, but to “help” able-bodied people who just will not work is silly and wrong. They don’t deserve a “fair shake.” The trouble with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of "other people's money." (Just common sense)

"Ruled" By the Mafia

Well, maybe not. But it’s just as bad as long as Obama and his band of criminals remain in office. He has STOLEN trillions of dollars and given them to his friends and donators to his election committees by “financing” their “green energy companies" that last only long enough to cash the check he sent them, then declare bankruptcy just as he knew they would. The people now in charge in Washington ARE criminals just as bad as the Mafia and will continue to steal from us as long as they remain in office. The very man charged with ENFORCING the law (Eric Holder) CHOOSES which laws he will enforce while actively shipping guns to the Mexican drug cartels to “prove” his thesis that their guns are provided by Americans so they can make tighter anti-gun laws. People die, but they don’t care. They say “You gotta break eggs to make an omelet.” I’m sickened by what I clearly see going on in Washington and am thankful I won’t be around much longer to see the end. I don’t want to live under a regime (which is Obama's plan, with him in charge) modeled after the Soviet Union. (Just common sense)

Where Are Al and Jesse?

They’re usually right there when a white man (or anybody they can CLAIM to be a white man) hurts or kills a black man, but where are they when black men kill a white woman? Nowhere, of course. Black on white violence doesn’t advance their “cause,” which is to fill their pockets with money by threatening to accuse large corporations of racism. When black men kill a white woman (OR a white man) they don’t care. They say it’s just “Karma.” Next thing, it’ll be a crime just to CRITICIZE the likes of Al or Jesse. They’re working in that direction. Or am I giving them ideas? (News With Attitude)

Obama Starts "Fink Site"

I remember way back when, the communists watched their citizens closely to “ferret out” people who opposed them so they could kill them or imprison them. They even had KIDS finking on their parents if they heard them say anything “subversive.” I don’t think we’re there yet, but we’re certainly in a place where Obama’s thugs can hurt you if you say anything against him, and he now even has a web site where “finks” can send him information about ANYBODY who says anything against him, whether the “report” is true or a lie, so he can “take action.” What that “action” will be, I don’t know. But I expect a visit from his thugs for something I said any time, because I say things he doesn’t like every day—on purpose. The question in my mind is, “Who gets to decide something is “unfounded?” (The Blaze)

Why Is there A Question?

Obama is such an obvious con man and criminal, there should BE no question about getting rid of him as president as quickly as possible. If he is, in fact, ineligible to BE president because he was born in Kenya, that would be an easy solution, but would likely take longer than the time left to the next election to get him out of office, since he would cling to it like a cat trying to avoid a bath. He has clearly STOLEN billions of dollars from the American citizens, made the unemployment picture so much worse than it should be by his ignorant policies, made the economy much worse because of more ignorant policies, and moved us ever closer to socialism with more policies designed to FORCE us into becoming a socialist nation—which is the LAST thing anybody with any modicum of intelligence wants.

He has spent more money than there IS, in his doomed efforts to “bail out” chosen businesses, claiming victory because General Motors is now making a profit—something he decries otherwise as evil. He has PROMISED to “bankrupt the coal industry,” an industry that is ESSENTIAL tour well-being. He is doing all he can to bankrupt the energy business and keep gasoline prices as high as possible to advance his efforts to socialize this country. There is so much more I could say about this that I don’t have room to say it. But the only reason I can see for him to remain “hovering” around the 50% mark in the polls is his ability to make the polls say what he wants as long as he IS president. I think once intelligent Americans are allowed to make their wishes known he will lose so badly his thugs cannot steal the election. (Just common sense)

How Obama STOLE the Election

I’ve always known Obama stole the 2008 election, but I couldn’t prove it. Now we know at least PART of it. In Indiana, he FALSIFIED paperwork to get on the ballot in Indiana and FORGED his name on the paperwork for himself, AND Hillary Clinton. If this is proven it could make EVERYTHING he has done as president be called into question. Will it ever happen? Doubtful with the “spineless” Republicans out there. No doubt Obama and other Democrats will (try to) use similar scams to con their way into office again in 2012. We need to be “wise” to them and stop it wherever we can. We have to be constantly on the lookout for such criminality so con artists like Obama and Hillary won’t be our “leaders” any longer and can’t do their “dirty work” to enslave us and spend all our money. (Insider)

Economy Boom Because of Oil

In N. Dakota they’ve got so much money coming in because of their oil discovery and the new method of extracting it (Fracking), they want to eliminate their property tax. But NOOOO, the unions won’t have that because they know a large part of the surplus will come to them and they don’t want anything to get in the way of that. Still, I think there’s still time for Obama to put a stop to it by banning fracking, altogether—which is definitely something he would do, claiming it is for the “greening” of the nation, not to stop a business he has PLEDGED to END, right along with another essential business, coal. Obama doesn’t want ANYTHING to get in the way of his plans to blame the free market for the deepening recession so he can institute more and more socialist policies. He’s already put a big crimp in the oil business by stopping the Canada oil pipeline for a spurious reason while maintaining his moratorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and helping other countries in their drilling efforts while promising to be “their biggest customer.” (The Blaze)

What's Wrong With Legalizing Drugs?

The “drug war” has been a colossal failure. All it has done is give the government an excuse to make more and more laws, some of them even unconstitutional, to “fight the war on drugs” while drug dealers and drug cartels keep right on supplying drugs to weak-minded Americans. It has done NOTHING to stop, or even SLOW DOWN the flow of drugs into our schools (right down to grade schools) and our neighborhoods. Being “illegal” forces prices high enough to ensure a huge profit, enough to make it profitable to sell to even tiny children, who must steal from their parents to buy them. What is the result? There are MORE people abusing drugs now than there were when it started. Those wishing to KEEP the “war on drugs” are going say people who want to legalize drugs (like me) just want to keep the drugs coming. Those are the words of a fool. I’ve NEVER used drugs. I’m probably the last person on earth who has no idea what marijuana tastes like (though I DO know what it smells like, after 18 years as a paramedic, scraping addicts off the streets).

I have lost TWO of my children to drugs, (one to booze AND drugs, the other to an overdose) so don’t you DARE tell me I’m somebody who wants the flow of drugs to continue. What I DO want is for somebody to find a good SUBSTITUTE, one that will DO what the “war on drugs” was designed to do: STOP the flow of drugs. Legalizing them will force the price down to the point where the drug cartels and your local drug dealers won’t see enough profit to make the risk in selling them worthwhile. People will criticize me for this, but to them I say, “Do you have anything better?” Something that will WORK? The “war on drugs” certainly hasn’t worked, and has created a lot of violence in addition to killing off their own customers, but they don't care, there are enough new customers to make up the difference. So why should we keep doing the same thing over and over and hoping for a different result? That’s the definition of crazy. Are we crazy? (Raw Story)

Scaring Us again

The “global warming” scammers are desperate. They’re in panic because we’re “wising up” to their swindle and they’re not conning us out of as much of our hard-earned cash as before. So now they’ve “released” a new report that says “the world as we know it will end soon if we don’t start acting right.” Of course, “acting right” means giving more money to the global warming alarmist swindlers. This “report” says that global warming and overpopulation will lead to “mass extinctions” of humanity. Of course, they don’t say HOW (except for unprovable either way claims), but they never do. They just make their declarations and expect us to believe them, even though the whole “report” is made up out of whole cloth. (World Net Daily)

Clinton and His Porn Stars

TMZ published a picture of former President Bill Clinton in his favorite place: between two porn stars at a porn star convention. One had just been given the Porn equivalent of an "Academy Award." The surprising thing is that these two porn stars actually had their clothes on, something I’m sure is unusual when with Bill. And I’m sure Bill had their clothes off at some point before or after this picture was taken. You can be sure a sex maniac like Bill would never miss such an opportunity. And I’m sure neither of these girls would not miss the opportunity to have sex with an ex president. (TMZ)

Latest "Hit Piece" On the Rich

Probably not the MOST recent. It appeared in the Guardian and emphasizes that “the rich” spend their money on “luxury travel adventures.” So what? They SPEND their money and when they do, they CREATE JOBS. It doesn’t matter what they spend their money on, they SPEND it, and we ALL benefit. Obama and his wife do the same thing. The only difference is, they do it on OUR MONEY. I wish I could take as many lavish “vacations” as Michelle and Barack do while taking along a bunch of horny Secret Service agents for protection. The only question there is, do we pay for the “dalliances” of those agents? (The Guardian)

"Incendiary" Comments

The new head of the Black Panthers, who calls himself a “Field Marshal,”  and who gave himself the name “KING” Samir Shabazz (they’re all named Shabazz) says, “Whites ought to be glad we’re not yet hanging them.” Seems kinda funny coming from people who were once hanged, themselves. They openly say they HATE WHITE PEOPLE and want to KILL them all. Is this not “incendiary remarks?” And is there not a law against that kind of talk? If I threatened the president in such a way I would quickly be arrested and imprisoned. Why not these people? Because, according to Attorney General, Holder, “They are my people.” I guess we can count on black people who agree with this administration to NOT be arrested, no matter how violent they get, in voice and deed as long as this administration is in power. Notice the pictures published show ALL these people dressed like those African murderers who BEHEAD people with a rusty knife in front of video cameras. The only difference is the Black Panthers do not yet wear masks to avoid capture. I guess they figure they don’t need them yet with those wimpy liberals in power. Wait until somebody with gonads gets into power. Then the masks will come out. (The Blaze)

"Capitalism Has Never Worked"

 That’s what Obama says to support his attempts to decimate the economy so he can impose more and more socialist measures upon us. But that’s one of the biggest LIES he has ever told. Capitalism (otherwise known as the free market) is the reason we have prospered beyond the wildest hopes of countries and civilizations that have been around for THOUSANDS  of years, and we did it in less than 300 years. It has made us the “destination of choice” for people from all over the world who want to better themselves. It is responsible for average people becoming rich so they can be targeted by dolts such as Barack Obama, our incompetent president, who wants to make us into a socialist country. Actually, it is SOCIALISM that has never worked, and why he and others promote it is a mystery to me, unless I realize he IS incompetent. (Just common sense)

CBS Ignores Its Own Poll

It must be hard to take a poll and have the results not be what you expected and wished. “The latest CBS News/New York Times poll not only shows Mitt Romney ahead of Barack Obama by three points, but also that Romney is leading among women voters. That was such an embarrassing result that CBS This Morning totally skipped it on Tuesday. By contrast, on ABC's Good Morning America, George Stephanopoulos and Jake Tapper openly discussed how it's a "‘stunning poll’ and ‘bad news for Obama.’ Team Obama complained the poll was biased. Well, there was certainly bias in CBS omitting their own poll results.” The poll may have been biased, but in FAVOR of Obama. Too bad it didn’t work out that way. The REAL results must have been REALLY bad for Obama. (Media Research Center)

Liberals Starting to Lose

As will always happen when liberals get in power, they do so many stupid things they “wake up a sleeping giant” who soon “slaps them aside” and cause many Republicans to be elected. Then Republicans institute things like Wis. Gov. Walker did that takes away the “freebies” people have come to think of as “their due” and THEY get “up in arms” and put liberals back in. Then liberals “go wild” again, spending all their money, their children’s money, and their grandchildren’s money for eons to some, and they “wake up” again . . .and it starts all over. If people would just STAY awake long enough, we might BEGIN to make things better and keep them that way. But that's not going to happen. Those who just want a "free ride" have grown too numerous and can always “vote themselves largesse from the treasury.” (Just common sense)

Obama Better Watch Out

He has taken on a tough man. Somebody whose coffee such as he (Obama) could not even carry. He has taken on a man who can wipe up the floor with him and he doesn’t even realize it. Joe Arpaio says, “Bring it on!” Obama had hidden his many papers from Arpaio’s investigators, but if this suit goes to court he will have to produce them. I don’t care if he IS president. He is NOT above the law and Arpaio is well experienced in the law—as Obama is NOT. George Soros, one of Obama’s closest confidantes, and one of America’s biggest enemies, has pledged $10 million dollars to defeat Arpaio. But it ain’t agonna work. Arpaio is tougher than BOTH of them put together.(Just common sense)

Objecting to Voter ID Laws

Why does the Attorney General of the United States object to a law requiring photo ID to vote? Why, when we have to show one to buy a pack of CIGARETTES and sometimes even to use a public toilet, or get on an airplane, or so many other things that EVERYBODY ought to have one in order to survive in this society, why should Holder object to requiring one to do such an important thing as VOTING? Everybody gets ONE vote. To ensure this, a photo ID SHOULD be required, unless you’re more concerned with a politician’s ability to steal elections than in the validity of the voter to be a legal voter. (Main Justice)

Does ANYBODY Know Obama?

Maybe some members of his worldwide, extended family do, but nobody in America does. He wrote TWO books about his past, both of them “fairy tales.” None of what he wrote is true. He has “sealed” access to EVERY piece of paper that might reveal something about him; why? Because there’s SOMETHING there he doesn’t want the American people to know. He refuses to release his REAL birth certificate, and even went so far as to release a “cobbled-up,” Photoshopped phony. Obama IS a “phony.” He’s a con man who conned his way into the presidency and that’s it. He should be run out of Washington on a rail. SOMEBODY needs to do a REAL investigation into his past. But does anybody have the guts? And will that somebody SURVIVE if he/she actually FINDS something Obama doesn’t want us to know? Probably not. Breitbart didn’t. I might not survive writing this. (Just common sense)

No Imagination

A Democrat (New York Magazine Editor John Heilemann) was interviewed on a liberal television show the other day and the interviewer (Charlie Rose) asked a really stupid question: “Why are Republicans so bent on defeating Obama?” It’s stupid because the REAL answer is obvious: they‘re REPUBLICANS! They disagree on almost everything he does and see it as a real danger! But this ignorant liberal gives an equally stupid answer. It was quite complicated (politicians have a built-in inability to give short answers to anything) but it boiled down to one word: RACISM. He couldn’t think of ANYTHING else to account for it: not the FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS Obama has spent on his silly ideas on “green energy” (Actually his way of "paying off" his supporters). Not his actions to make unemployment worse. Not his hard work to move us ever closer to that dishonest and unworkable system, socialism. Not his incompetence in office or his hourly LIES on almost every subject. I just wonder what this liberal has been SMOKING. Is he STUPID? Or is he just as incompetent as Obama? What about Rose, who asked such a stupid question? What planet has he been living on for the last three years and more?

Why are we plagued with such incompetent and stupid people in pivotal positions? How do such people GET there? The answer to that is that when those appointing them are incompetent, incompetence then becomes a condition for employment. That begs the question: which came first, the chicken or the egg? I don’t know; I only know we’re suffering form the ignorance and incompetence of our “leaders.”  What I DO know is that color has NOTHING to do with even DEMOCRATS moving away from Obama in droves. The only person who may REALLY believe it cannot be anything but racism is Obama himself; who is just as much white as black, but CHOOSES to emphasize his black side, so he can take advantage of it. (PBS/Rush Limbaugh)

Racism and Discrimination

I’ve been accused of racism many times; not because I AM racist—I’m not. I judge people as INDIVIDUALS and I criticize people INDISCRIMINATELY. One of the groups who cry out the most about discrimination is the Islamic radical, many of whom are simply terrorists. It makes not a whit to me if the people I criticize are black or white, Muslim or Christian, or whatever. But the very term “racist” has been made meaningless by its INDISCRIMINATE use to avoid criticism from ANYBODY. The woman who got fired recently from a small academic journal for “being racist” and writing something racist because some people disagreed with what she wrote is MARRIED to a black man. If I were a racist, I could NOT be married to a person of a different race. Some people want to shut certain people up because they disagree with them. That’s stupid and silly. The truth is the truth. It HAS no agenda, and shutting the truth-teller up will not change that. I will continue to criticize people I believe are due criticism, black, white, Islamic, Asian, etc.

I care not what GROUP to which they belong. Barack Obama told us if we elected him president we would “eliminate racism forever.” Yet today, race is the common thing USED to blunt ANY criticism of him or his policies. Racism has gone down significantly, but race-baiters like Obama, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan continue to “fan the fires” of racism while falsely claiming it has INCREASED. In fact, the race situation has REVERSED itself. Today in some organizations it is better to BE black or another “minority” because of recent laws and “regulations” made to supposedly “mitigate” what our ANCESTORS did to members of minorities. Things that people alive today could NOT have been responsible for. This is foolish and leads to appointing (or electing) incompetent people to positions where they can use their incompetence to ruin things while those who criticize them are simply called racists without examining their criticism. (Just common sense)