Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Our Greatest Danger Today
Sharia Law. Don’t believe it? Read this: Recently, Matthew Staver, Founder and Chairman, Liberty Council, was to speak at an important national conference on the effect of Sharia law on the U. S. Constitution at the Hutton Hotel in Nashville, Tennessee, But before the conference could be held, the hotel violated a contract and cancelled the conference, citing “security concerns.” Which means, I suppose, they were afraid representatives of that “peaceful religion” of Islam might bomb the hotel or create some other kind of violence. This has nothing to do with the Constitution, you say? If the conference organizers sue the hotel to enforce the contract, who do you think will win, with the threat of violence from one side? “The fact is, private companies and municipalities are facing more and more pressure to cater to or adopt special rules for Muslims. In one recent case, Muslim workers claimed ‘unfair labor practices’ because they were told to clock out before taking prayer breaks. In another instance, claims of discrimination were leveled when Muslim women were told not to wear their head scarves for safety reasons before going on a roller coaster. And now in courts of law across this nation, Shariah law is already being applied in case after case. There are actually dozens of ‘Shariah law’ cases in our courts! A study by the Center for Security Policy found 50 state court cases that considered Shariah law.
To make matters worse, these cases referenced differing variations of Shariah law from 16 countries. The study concluded, ‘[J]udges are making decisions deferring to Shariah law even when those decisions conflict with constitutional protections’.” (Matthew Staver) Any judge that makes a decision based on anything BUT The Constitution of the United States should be removed for cause and his/her decision voided because the Constitution is the ONE basis for ALL. Our laws. Nothing else, nowhere. Just the Constitution. "[T]he truth is, the greatest threat our nation now faces from radical Islam is not in the form of another 9/11 attack, but rather in the slow, steady, and systematic implementation of Shariah law. It’s already happening in Europe where schools are adopting special rules for Muslim students during Rhamadan. Europe is so far gone that the Archbishop of Canterbury (the head of the Church of England) said that the adoption of Shariah law is 'unavoidable' and the idea that 'there is one law for everybody' is 'a bit of a danger'." (Ibid.) "Danger?" From where? From those representatives of that "peaceful religion" of Islam? The idea that there is one law for everybody IS the only right thing, and to think otherwise shows total IGNORANCE and should, again, be grounds for removal for a judge, who should know the law and how it works. Fear of retaliation should not be a factor. If we give in to far, civilization is lost. (Just common sense)
To make matters worse, these cases referenced differing variations of Shariah law from 16 countries. The study concluded, ‘[J]udges are making decisions deferring to Shariah law even when those decisions conflict with constitutional protections’.” (Matthew Staver) Any judge that makes a decision based on anything BUT The Constitution of the United States should be removed for cause and his/her decision voided because the Constitution is the ONE basis for ALL. Our laws. Nothing else, nowhere. Just the Constitution. "[T]he truth is, the greatest threat our nation now faces from radical Islam is not in the form of another 9/11 attack, but rather in the slow, steady, and systematic implementation of Shariah law. It’s already happening in Europe where schools are adopting special rules for Muslim students during Rhamadan. Europe is so far gone that the Archbishop of Canterbury (the head of the Church of England) said that the adoption of Shariah law is 'unavoidable' and the idea that 'there is one law for everybody' is 'a bit of a danger'." (Ibid.) "Danger?" From where? From those representatives of that "peaceful religion" of Islam? The idea that there is one law for everybody IS the only right thing, and to think otherwise shows total IGNORANCE and should, again, be grounds for removal for a judge, who should know the law and how it works. Fear of retaliation should not be a factor. If we give in to far, civilization is lost. (Just common sense)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment