The Heights of Stupidity

The “Occupy Wherever” crowd now claims the Tea Party STOLE the “Don’t Tread on Me” logo from them. And what delusion makes them think that? Actually, it's the other way around. The “Tea Parties” have been in existence and using that logo for a long time before some ignorant liberal thought up the OWS idea in the first place. The very IDEA of them “stealing” the logo is absurd, since it is a symbol of the revolution that CREATED this country and CANNOT be stolen, except by people whose goals are completely opposite to what that logo means. Like the OWS "movement." (The Blaze)

For Doing What THEY Do

Liberals are criticizing Hank Williams, Jr. for comparing Obama with Hitler (which he did NOT) while comparing everything we do with Hitler themselves. And people who pay no attention to politics BUY it. They COUNT on those people who pay no attention to politics for their gains. They “condition” them every day in the news and they then want to attack people like me for trying to set them straight. One man called me a “right-wing LOON” for citing the IRS figures that showed 86% of ALL income taxes were paid by the top 25% of taxpayers. He couldn’t answer that so he just started calling me names, as liberals ALWAYS do when faced with facts they don’t like. (The Blaze)

"Occupy wall Street" is Marxist

They CLAIM it is “without leadership,” but they’re lying. It has definite MARXIST beginnings, from way back in the sixties. If you don’t know what Marxism is, you’re woefully undereducated and better learn, quick. Think “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.” If you don’t know what THAT was, you’ve been living under a rock for a long time. “The OWS is NOT a ‘leaderless movement’. The ‘useful idiots’ in the streets may not know who the Big Leader(s) are- BUT that does not mean there is NOT a Leader. George Soros, Steve Lerner and Obama/the DNC are behind most of the groups and the $$$$ behind OWS.” (Yahoo News)

Corruption of the Bride

“How much does it cost taxpayers to fly First Lady Michelle Obama, her two daughters and her mother, a niece and a nephew, a hairstylist and makeup artists to South Africa and Botswana to give a few speeches, meet Nelson Mandela, and enjoy a safari on a private game preserve?” A half a million dollars, and that’s just for the air fare. Her small daughters were listed on the flight manifest as “senior staff members.” Since when does this government hire children THAT young to be “senior staff members?” Yes, she did give a few speeches. Obama does that, too, to “legitimize" HIS junkets. So do Senators and congressmen(women). They can’t cut costs anywhere, but they have enough money for their junkets, even if they have to LIE about members of their parties. Gadzooks, what a bunch of crooks! He's coming to Denver today and they rented ELEVEN cars for his “hangers-on,” and that doesn't even include his own limos. (Washington Examiner)

"Don't Criticize Democrats!"

Democrats are responsible for ALL the things the idiots of “Occupy Wall Street (or whatever)” are protesting, but they insist on blaming “Wall Street” exclusively, and Republicans peripherally. What kind of FOOLS are these? This shows the kind of fools who are running things in Washington, on BOTH sides. One protester moaned about people saying “we have no specific demands, but I have one: my child is hungry.” That’s Obama’s fault! Not Wall Street. Without Wall Street, the people who invest money in jobs-creating projects have less, or no money to invest. Yes, there ARE millionaires who “take advantage of the system,” DEMANDING subsidies when they do not deserve them (Think “Solyndra”). But others do not. They just “do their thing,” employ many people, and create jobs and MORE millionaires without demanding money from pliable politicians like Obama. These fools who are demonstrating (in small groups all over the nation) are merely showing their own ignorance. Not like the Tea Parties, who are TRULY spontaneous, unlike OWS, they know what they want and are going to get it. (Rush Limbaugh)

Karzai Learned His Lesson

He used to say we should “talk to the Taliban.” Now, after many tries and many failures, he now concedes “talking to the terrorists is futile.” Why is it that a guy like me, from thousands of miles away, and with NO close association with Islamic terrorists, knows this, while Karzai, who has LIVED closely with them, does not? (I follow common sense and logic.) The Islamic terrorists want ONE THING: for EVERYBODY in the world to be THEIR KIND of Muslim, or DEAD. There’s NO middle ground. They might AGREE to various things, but in the final analysis, they will only keep their word as long as it suits their plans. It’s in their RELIGION to lie to “Infidels.” (Yahoo News)

Computer Down All Week

I lost the second hard drive in two weeks last Sunday (10/16/11) and haven’t been able to post until now. I’m in the process of reloading all my software on this new computer and it might be a while before I can post again. Please excuse the inconvenience. I may be able to post something tomorrow.

"A World Without God"

That’s what the militant atheists want. They want nothing to do with God and that’s okay. It’s their choice, and they’re entitled to it. But they also want to take God away from members of other religions (Atheism IS a religion in itself). They don’t like competition in their religion. What hurts them if OTHERS believe in God (or Allah, or whatever else HE’S called)? If you don’t believe the claims made in the various religions, just laugh them off and leave other people to their beliefs. They are not hurting you. You are free to NOT believe in God, but you are NOT free to stop OTHERS from so believing. Atheists are acting like Islamic extremists, who want to KILL people for believing differently than they do. If the atheists succeed in their efforts, that will be the next thing on their list. (The Blaze)

What An Imbecile!

Obama’s senior advisor Valerie Jarett says “the point of government is to give people a livelihood so they can provide for their families.” What? I thought the point of government was to GOVERN and simply stay out of the way so those with the will to do so can EARN their livelihood. I think Obama needs to create at least one new job; hers, for someone else who has the brains to do the job. This ignorant woman certainly doesn’t. But will he? Doubtful because he AGREES with her ignorance. Another new job opening he should "create" is HIS. (The Blaze)

Worried About Our Killing Enemies

The liberals (Democrats) are SO worried about the government killing when we go after such as bin Laden and “American citizen” al-Alwaki. They’re wearing out their crying handkerchiefs. But they don’t say a word about their own tendencies in the same direction. If Bush had done some of the things Obama ans other liberals have done, there would be no end of stories in the left-leaning media. In any case, people like bin Laden and al-Alwaki have lost the right to be considered to have “rights.” They have murdered wantonly thousands of Americans and others. They are ENEMY COMBATANTS, wherever they were born, and are subject to being killed or captured, wherever they hide. Bush told them there was NOWHERE they could hide from our retribution and I’m happy to see that Obama, no matter how timid he is in declaring this AS a war, has followed that lead. Liberals will cry crocodile tears when we go into Pakistan and other countries where they’re hiding to kill and capture them, and will be unable to wring out their handkerchiefs, they’ll be so wet. But I hope we will continue to make the Islamic terrorists PAY with their lives. (Steven Hayward/Power Line)

Talk About Turning It Around!

Democrat Shiela Jackson Lee, one of the biggest practitioners or “racial politics” (after Obama and his henchmen) is telling US to “stop the racial politics! What a FOOL this woman is!” She actually BELIEVES it is the CONSERVATIVES who “play the race card.” Then minutes later she tells her audience to “buy African-American.” Is this NOT “playing the race card?” And this is the kind of people we (not me) have elected to run this country! Sheesh! We have to stop electing fools like this. Or we’re going “down the tubes” faster and faster every election. Democrats are best at accusing their opponents of doing the very thing THEY are doing the most. (The Blaze)

Same Old Crap!

I get so tired of hearing (mostly) liberal and/or socialist politicians say the same old crap, time and again. Things like “the rich get richer and the poor get poorer” when they don’t get their way. Things like “tax the rich” and “the rich don’t pay their fair share” when they not only DO, they pay MORE than their share. The Senate “shut down” Obama’s latest SPENDING bill (he calls it his “jobs bill”) and he uses the raggedy old “rich get richer” bullsh-t. Sometimes I wish they’d come up with something new to bullsh-t us with instead of the crappy old statements we’ve heard so many times they’ve gotten moldy. They just insult our intelligence. (Just common sense)

Incompetent Politicians

“Oops! We found some money! Never mind the possible government shutdown.” (FEMA) Thus, the end of the most recent panic over government funding, in which politicians “cried wolf” again for the fourth time (I think) this year (maybe it was more), threatening the shutdown of the government over lack of money. Why is it the government, whose ONLY job is figuring out how to spend our money—can’t seem to do it for more than a few weeks at a time? Are we doomed to have to listen to the panicked cries of these incompetent politicians forever? When are we going to elect some COMPETENT politicians? Are we soon going to ignore such panicked cries for “emergency legislation” to avert “disaster?” It's always an "emergency" because those in charge don't know how to run the government. Then we're supposed to "rescue them" by letting them tax us some more. (Planetizen)

Who's Behind "Occupy Wall Street?"

They SAY there are “no leaders” for their “Occupy Wall street” demonstrations, but there ARE. Maybe they’re not DIRECT leaders, but they are leaders, nonetheless. They are people like George Soros, who has many organizations that he funds, using his vast $billions; then there’s the “Tides Foundation” and ”Code Pink,” both funded by Soros (who paid to print their “free” newspaper, “Occupy Wall Street Journal”). Jesse Jackson, Michael Moore and Al Sharpton are supporters of these demonstrations, and I expect to see them actively marching with the demonstrators, as is self-admitted communist Van Jones, who has verbally aligned himself with them. Cornel West, the college professor who says Herman Cain should “get off the crack pipe” has also praised these fools. Former House Speaker Nancy Peelosi also supports them, as does President Obama, although he has not said so openly. But you can tell by his facial expressions when he talks about them. The “usual suspects,” like Harry Belafonte and Kayne West, and other “show biz” celebrities support them. Many of the demonstrators are volunteers (lured there by free sex, drugs, and booze), but many admit to being paid, some up to $20 an hour. In Boston, they demonstrate in favor of an Islamic terrorist who planned “violent Jihad against the United States. (Just common sense)

Denying the Obvious

Politicians (mostly liberals) do it all the time, then go on as if you believed them. A good example: Obama denying he is pushing “class envy.” Another is denying the plain fact that Social Security is a PYRAMID scheme, also called a “Ponzi scheme” after the name of the man who made the scheme famous in our lifetime. Bernie Madoff is one of the best-known users of the pyramid scheme lately, and he is in prison. Not so for the government agents operating the Social Security system, which is today “not quite” a pyramid scheme any more because of certain changes from the original; notably the fact it is MANDATORY for those who do not work in privileged jobs that are not subject to it, notably government jobs. Another factor is that the government looted the so-called “Social Security Lockbox” where the money was supposed to be kept, early on. But it was DESIGNED after the pyramid scheme and still works much the same. Rick Perry should have called it SIMILAR to a Ponzi scheme and been more accurate, giving his opponents less opportunity to call him a liar. (Just common sense)

Big Difference, Stupid!

Comedian Jon Stewart, who PRETENDS to be a news commentator, says, “How are the “Occupy Wall Street” protesters any different from the “Tea Parties?” What A STUPID QUESTION that IS! The answer is simple. The “OWS” demonstrators don’t even know what they want and their “demands” are all over the place, mostly leaning toward a “socialist America.” They get arrested by the hundreds in one day and leave messes everywhere they go. The Tea parties, on the other hand, simply want our freedom back, lower taxes, fewer “regulations” and less “micromanaging” of our lives. They want the government to obey the Constitution, from which is derived the law of the land. They’re tired of hearing liberal lies. They don’t get arrested and don't leave messes, even when the local cops are brainwashed against them. They're the opposite sides of a very different coin. (The Blaze)

"Quantitative Easing" A Federal Crime

Why then, does nobody arrest and prosecute Ben Vernanke, the perpetrator? Because he is the boss of the Fed? Does that absolve him of the criminality of counterfeiting? If I did it, I would soon be in prison. What’s different about him? That he was appointed by a president to do this? Why then, does nobody arrest and prosecute the president for counterfeiting? It amazes me how government figures commit crimes every day and nobody even CALLS it a crime: like that former Ponzi (pyramid) scheme called Social Security? Again, if I did that, I’d be in prison. But the government does it, and has been doing it every day since 1938 when FDR foisted it upon the American people, and nobody calls it a crime. (The Smoking Gun)

Global Warming Unraveling

You remember the global warming swindle don’t you? The one that made former veep AlGore $BILLIONS AND A Nobel Peace Prize? The one Al won’t let you call “global warming” any more because that name doesn’t work to illustrate the lie any more? It’s beginning to “unravel” seriously with the increasing revelations of scientific fraud and the retractions that have resulted. Scientists all over the world have “fudged the numbers” and outright LIED to support Al’s swindle. Now they’re being found out and Al’s insistence that ANYBODY who doubts him is “not in the mainstream of science” doesn’t work any more. His scheme is being revealed and I figure he’ll be buried under lawsuits soon; lawsuits that will hopefully take away all his ill-gotten gains. (Power Line)

Why IS IT A Controversy?

Texas Gov. Perry called Social Security a “Ponzi scheme” and has been excoriated from BOTH SIDES for it. People who deny that Social Security is a “Ponzi scheme are revealing their own ignorance. Social Security may not STILL be a Ponzi scheme today because of several factors: 1. A Ponzi scheme is VOLUNTARY; SS is NOT. A Ponzi scheme keeps the money paid in to use in paying off later suck . . . er, uh, investors. SS does not. The money paid in by early suck . . . uh, investors was stolen and spent a long time ago. So yes, SS is NO LONGER a “pure” Ponzi scheme. But it still WORKS like one. It takes money paid in by early suck . . . uh, investors and uses it to pay off later suck . . . uh, investors. (Just common sense)

White House Screams At Reporter

Seems like reporting scandal is a reporter’s job. But the White House apparently doesn’t agree with that. “The Fast and Furious scandal, in which the Justice Department knowingly gave Mexican criminal gangs thousands of guns, just keeps escalating. The latest development centers around whether or not Attorney General Eric Holder lied to Congress about having knowledge of the controversial gun trafficking operation. Recently released documents say Holder was briefed about the operation long before he told the Judiciary Committee he was first aware of what was going on (Holder now claims he misunderstood the question that was being asked) . What's more, CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson -- who's been covering the scandal from the beginning -- says in an interview on the Laura Ingraham Show today that the White House and Justice Department have taken to screaming at her for reporting on the story.” This administration is coming very close to “coming apart at the seams” if they “scream at” a reporter for covering the story about one of the biggest scandals involving the White House in this administration. (Weekly Standard)

ENRON and Solyndra

Solyndra is much like Enron, except the person who got conned was Obama and his fixation with that AlGore swindle, global warming. He thinks “sun power” is the answer, when it isn’t. But he was willing to put $535 million into it; a sum most of us don’t have, and would not be willing to put into a questionable and unproven technology if we DID have it. (If we DID have it, that would be because we’re too smart to fall for a swindle like the one Obama fell for with OUR money. But politicians like him don’t have to be smart because they don’t have to EARN the money they squander). When you think in trillions (you don’t own, and didn’t have to EARN), you can lose LOT of money because you’re investing “other people’s money.” (Power Line)

Media Hates Fox News

Because Fox is now doing the job they USED TO do and making them look useless. They wonder why they’re losing readers and watchers so fast; it’s because people are tired of hearing their liberal drivel and move over to Fox, which they can depend on for the truth and both sides of any story (so far). The same is true in newspapers. Newspapers are failing at an unprecedented rate, all over the country. In Denver, after The Rocky Mountain News failed, The Denver Post immediately raised their prices by 50%, while making their paper 25% smaller the same day. I expect them to fail before the end of the year unless Obama “bails them out” because they’re the only major paper left in Denver. Then they MAY last a few more years spending taxpayer money while they continue to do Obama's bidding . (Just common sense)

Discrediting the REAL Experts

The media didn’t like it when some eminent economists published a book showing just how wrong they were so they labeled them “too controversial” and banned mention of their opinion. Washing ton then ignored them and “shunned” them. But their book is still out there and we haven’t yet gotten to the point in this nation where Obama can BAN such books if he doesn’t agree with their content. (News Max)

No Place to Hide

That’s what top al-Qaida operatives are learning. Bin Laden learned it in May (if Obama is to be believed). I think it was one of his (bin Laden) doubles that was killed; the ones they used to make us think he was still alive after Bush bombed one of his caves with him in it years ago, making him into a ”crispy critter.” Anwar al-Alaki and Samir Khan, both American born, and both top al-Qaida operatives, were killed by an unmanned drone in YEMEN, fergawdsake! I bet they thought they were safe there. Some liberals and even a few CONSERVATIVES say killing them ANYWHERE without a trial and a conviction is unlawful. I say they’re not "criminals," with "Miranda Rights," but are “enemy combatants” who indiscriminately kill Americans and others, and they’re “fair game” in a war where they don’t wear uniforms and have no recognizable government (except maybe Iran) involved. They have, by their actions, FOREFEITED any claim to “due process. I say, kill them where you find them. (Yahoo News)

The Enemy Is Hard to Find

ENEMY IS HARD TO FIND: There’s a good reason why we’re having a problem taking the Islamic terrorists down, even though we ARE “making inroads, having killed some of their top commanders and messing up their infrastructure. There is no recognized country involved, as there is in most wars. They’re like roaches; turn on the light and they all “scatter” into hiding. They never stand and fight. They know they’d die if they did that. So we have to “hunt them down” and kill them. Liberals treat this as if it were “just another war” and it is not. They think it is SEVERAL wars, and it is not; it is ONE WAR against Islamic terrorists (even if Obama doesn’t want to use that term) with several theaters. If they don’t “wake up” and realize that, we’re going to lose this war as we have every other war started and run by liberals. (Just common sense)