Self-Created Recession

The Dumocrats have long been predicting that we would have a recession under President Trump. Meanwhile Trump has been doing things that have unmistakably made the current economic boom so amazing, and lasting. Meanwhile, Dumocrats are still predicting a recession. They desperately say the booming economy is a “bubble” and that bubble is bound to burst, creating a recession to make the 2008 recession look like child’s play. We were still waiting, and waiting, for that to happen when the Coronavirus intervened, and this entire country began to “shut down” in response. This is a reaction that is way out of line. People are deathly afraid of the virus, that came out of communist China, as a result of their more lax cleanliness in general. Liberals will call me racist for saying that, but it’s not racist to tell the truth—and that’s what I do, while some people don’t like it. Tough turtle.

Truth is truth, whether or not people like it. So now we’re setting ourselves up for the recession the Dumocrats predicted. Not because of what Trump is doing, but in SPITE of it. But that will not make a difference to Dumocrats. They will blame that virus-induced recession on President Trump, as they have done with everything bad that has ever happened since he was elected. And many less intelligent people will believe them, and join in blaming Trump. But the coming recession is self-created, and unnecessary. It will not slow the progression of this Chinese produced disease, but it may alter the direction in which this nation moves as a result. Not because of Trump, but in spite of him. (Just common sense)

We're NOT "Divided!"

No more than usual, of course. Except for the Dumocrats’ “unhinged hatred” of President Trump. I don’t think I’ve ever sen a president that has been subjected to worse insults than has this president, And ALL are lies, designed to “divide us” more. Then when I hear people like “Mayor Pete” saying he’s there to stop the division,” and “unite us once again,” I have to laugh—and then vomit. He, and his pals, are the ones dividing us, and now they’re complaining about the division THEY’VE caused. This country’s government was DESIGNED to “divide us.” Without that division we would be a dictatorship. We’ve always been divided. We always will—hopefully. That is why they designed it with three separate, but equal branches. Legislative (Congress), Judicial (Supreme Court and lower courts), and executive (The President). That way, no single entity could “take over” and make all decisions without opposition when needed by an equal branch of government. To have a government with only one branch—the executive—making all the decisions and rules, is a dictatorship, which they didn’t want, They WANTED “division,” and we’ve had it ever since—and will continue to have it, no matter what the Dumocrats think they can do. If they do create a government without “division,” it WILL be a dictatorship—which is exactly what they want. (Just common sense)

Churches Are Now Targets

There was a time when nobody even considered allowing people to bring guns into a church, even if they were legally allowed to carry. That’s because they always considered a church a “place of peace and friendship,” and there was not only no reason to bring guns in, Not so today. After a number of fools have not only brought guns into churches, but have killed many people while they were worshiping their God. Now churches, themselves, are demanding “armed security” to protect their flocks. That doesn’t mean there will never again be any guns brought into those churches to kill the parishioners, it just means the prohibition on the law-abiding being armed there will cease, and anybody who brings his gun in to kill parishioners will likely meet a gun in the hands of one or more of the parishioners, as one did in Colorado Springs, Colorado, some time ago, when a tiny woman was there with her own gun and stopped a shooter cold. They CALLED her a “security guard,” but she was just a worshiper who was ASKED to bring her gun, just in case. In any case, this ONE GUN made all the difference. The shooter is dead, and only a couple of parishioners (who were in the parking lot) are dead. She saved the lives of all those in the church by shooting the gunman. (NBC News)

"God's Gift to Democrats"

Or maybe Allah’s, considering the way Dumocrats have supported giving Muslims rights not extended to Americans while supporting liberal judges when they give extremist Muslims things to which they are not entitled, but which they sue for. I speak of the Coronavirus. Many people will die, and Dumocrats will blame every death on President Trump, saying he is “incompetent” to win the fight against the disease while doing everything they can to oppose him in his every move to defeat the disease. They have already been telling the world they think he is incompetent to be president—as usual, with no evidence of anything—just their biased word. Nancy Peelosi has already done her best to stop Trump’s bill to make money available to fight it, by adding millions, maybe billions of dollars in pork to the bill before letting it go to a vote. Liberal judges, all over the country, will put every roadblock they can in his way, claiming they are just “protecting people’s rights.” The Market is down in a big way, all due to the virus, and they will try and convince you he is responsible for that. Dumocrats don’t care who dies, as long as they can get something out of it. (Just common sense)

"Shall NOT Be Infringed!"

What part of that do the anti-gun fools not understand? The Constitution, to which ALL laws made in the United States MUST conform, has a Second Amendment, which firmly states that “the right to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.” Yet every anti-gun law made infringes on that right. They might as well just make self defense illegal. There is no constitutional mention of self defense, and they might even get away with it. Or if they tried it, they might have caused a revolution, during which they, as the progenitors, would be killed in battle. I think that’s what they’re after, anyway. Making self defense illegal. It certainly seems that way, since whenever somebody uses some kind of a weapon in self defense, the cops want take it away from them, “as evidence,” of course. It doesn’t even have to be a gun. But they will certainly take away a gun that has been used in self defense. It looks as if they WANT you to be defenseless. And I think they do. If I walked down the street with a gun in my pocket and they caught me—without me breaking a single law with that gun, they’d arrest me and put me in jail, just for waking down the street with a gun in my pocket. Of course they’ll say I broke the law if the gun isn’t “properly registered” and I haven’t bothered to stand for a “background check,” but BOTH laws are unconstitutional “infringements” on my constitutional right to “keep and bear arms.” (Just common sense)

Against Self Defense

As I go about my business researching for my blogs, I notice one very obvious similarity in every “anti-gun law” now on the books, or in the process of being passed. It is that they ALL make it impossible for the law-abiding to defend themselves against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there. In New York, the abortion capital of the country because it condones infant murder, there is a law that forces anybody who simply wants to move a legally-owned gun from one place to another, put it in a lock-box, unloaded, before transporting it. In other words, make it USELESS for self defense. “Gun-free zones” make the law-abiding defenseless in them, while doing NOTHING to keep the law breakers from entering with their ILLEGAL guns and killing defenseless people. “Safe Storage laws” make it impossible to get a gun into action quickly enough to defend against a holder of an ILLEGAL gun, who already has his gun out, and pointed at you. I could go on and on, listing the many ways those laws and regulations make the law-abiding DEFENSELESS while the law breakers have no problem ignoring them, but my point is made. Take a look at ANY anti-gun law, and you’ll see they are all the same. They only impede self defense, while IGNORING the depredations of the law breakers. (Fox News)

They Get What They Want

People generally get what they want, and Dumocrats are no different. They seem to want to elect dictators to run their lives, and that’s what they get when a Dumocrat wins an election. Dumocrats love to ban things. It seems like they always have one or more efforts to ban something going at any time. And if a Dumocrat wins a presidential election, they have elected a potential dictator. But they’d better be careful what they wish for. If a dictator manages to gain total power, instead of the limited power president in this country now has, we’re all in big trouble because when they get what they want, we get it, too. When communists took over in Russia, they were voted in by gullible voters who had no idea what they were voting for. That heralded 75 years of oppression and murder by the dictators they elected, based on the LIES they were told. Greed was the main factor in their decision to vote for these fiends, and we are heading for the same fate if some of the fools now running for president manage to win the White House. They’ve all told us of the usurpations of power they plan, but nobody’s listening—except for the conservatives who can see clearly right through them while being roundly criticized by those who just want all the freebies they can get. (Just common sense)

Is He Stupid? Or Lying?

I’ve got to go with stupid, considering all Joe Biden’s previous stupidities. Now he’s telling us that guns have killed HALF the American population. Which tells me he’s either stupid, or he is making up his own statistics. Then he tells us he’s “coming for gun makers.” On WHAT? For engaging in a legal occupation? I think not. Biden is like all Dumocrats. They say and do whatever they figure will get them votes, and hope we don’t know any better. The big problem is that there is a certain segment of the population that DOESN’T know any better because they don’t pay any attention to politics until just before an election, when the lies are flying. My own son is one of them. He’s too concerned with his own pursuits to pay any attention and he thinks Trump is “part of the problem” while Trump goes about making our lives better in many ways. Dumocrats want us to think Trump is a Fascist, and is pushing Fascism. That’s wrong, but that’s the crap they’re selling. Trump is the best thing to have happened to this country in years, but those who listen to the pap the Dumocrats put out are unaware of it. (The Gun Feed)

He Didn't Expect That

A gunman burst into a convenience store and pointed a gun at the head of the 63-year-old clerk. He probably confidently thought he had an easy target in this little old lady—until she pulled out her own gun and shot him to death. He probably hadn’t considered that as a possibility. Now it’s too late. He’s dead. Again I say: this happens so often, I hesitate to report on all of them, lest it bore you. And I don’t want to bore you. But, contrary to what anti-gun fools tell you, having a gun made that little old lady the equal to that 48-year-old thug, to his dismay. And this woman protected not only herself, but also others I the store, all of whom would have been defenseless if she had not been armed, and willing to shoot. No liberals have yet criticized this little lady, but I’m sure that’s because the liberal media has avoided reporting on it, for the most part—except for local coverage. But I’m sure their criticism will come, because they’re that stupid. I notice this article mentioned that she had a LEGAL gun, but makes no mention of the legality (or lack thereof) of the robber’s gun. They’ll probably use that old saw, “Robbing a store shouldn’t carry a death penalty for the robber.” But neither does BEING robbed. (Conservative Tribune)

Dictator In Waiting

It’s easy to tell that “Sleepy Joe” Biden thinks getting elected president confers upon him dictatorial powers, and he “brooks no opposition” to his damned fool ideas. The absolute proof of that is when he laid a foul-mouthed cussing on one member of his “audience” who “called him to account” on his anti-gun views. Politicians who are not “dictators in waiting” will at least try to assuage his fears. Not Biden. He tells him he’s “full of sh-t” and “not to be such an ass,” then walks away, leaving the man fuming at his stupidity. Biden says he’ll “come for your AR-15s. Never mind the Constitution, to which ALL LAWS must conform, prohibits ANY “infringement” on out right to “bear arms.” How he plans to get around that is a mystery. Maybe he plans to just ignore that constitutional prohibition and become a dictator in actuality. It’d be nice if he was the only Dumocrat with such ideas, but he’s not. ANY Dumocrat who gets elected has the same foolish notion he (or she) can just ignore the constitution and do what he/she wants to the people in this country. (The Gun Feed)

What Is Socialism?

“Crazy Bernie” Sanders insists he is NOT a “socialist.” He is a “democratic socialist,” whatever THAT is. But in reality, there is no difference. Socialism is socialism, no matter what you append to it in your description, in hopes of fooling people about what it is. What socialism IS, is the THEFT of the fruits of the production of new wealth by those capable and willing to work and earn for themselves, for the benefit of those who are not. In other words, organized theft from the productive to give to the Unproductive. Socialism is but one form of collectivism. Communism is another, as is Fascism, Progressivism, and many other names collectivists use to fool the population by obfuscation. Their very motto tells the tale. It is: “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED,” Making need a DEMAND upon the earnings of those able and willing to produce new wealth. As such, collectivism produces nothing, since it DEPENDS on the production of the producers of society and loots them for a “share” of that produced. Which means it will always fail, since it produces nothing itself. (Just common sense)

Legal Gun Killed MLK?

On April 4, 1968, James L. Ray shot Martin Luther King to death, using a rifle he bought LEGALLY. Aren’t the laws supposed to stop that sort of thing? Ray was not only a convicted felon, he was an ESCAPED prisoner. Thus, he shouldn’t have been able to buy a gun. But he did, and he used it to murder an icon. Additionally, law enforcement at the time was so lax he was able to escape to Great Britain, hoping to continue on to Rhodesia. Unfortunately for him, the authorities, by this time, had identified him, and he was extradited, and faced murder charges in the case. This guy was a petty criminal who escaped from prison! How was he able to buy a 30.06 rifle and a box of 20 rounds from a legal gun dealer? Anti-gun fools tell us their laws will stop people from doing this, but they do not. Somebody like Ray, if he wants to do such a terrible crime, will get his gun somehow, if he has to buy it in a back alley somewhere, or just STEAL it. He doesn’t worry about the relatively minor crime of being a felon in possession of a gun. (War Is Boring)

Bernie Knows He's Losing

But he’s going to keep treading water until he drowns. I just listened to his “update” after his dismal showing in the “six states primaries,” most of which “Sleepy Joe” Biden won, and for a minute there, I thought he was going to withdraw. But no—he griped about losing so many delegates, then told us “we’ll find out which candidate is the best one to defeat President Trump in the upcoming one-on-one debate between him and Biden. Unfortunately for him, we already know that, from his dismal showing in so many races. Biden is the best one to go up against Trump, but he’s going to lose, and lose BIG. I almost expected him to demand Biden “share” his delegates with him, because that’s his theory of things. Those with ABILITY share their earnings with those with no ability. Bernie just doesn’t understand that there are only a FEW people who think an avowed socialist should be president, and those are the losers who will not earn for themselves, but prefer to live at someone else’s expense and they know Bernie will help them do that if elected. They’re not so sure of that with Biden although he has given every hint it will be so. Both Bernie and Joe are way too old to be put into the “pressure cooker” that is the presidency, no matter what their politics. Neither will come out of the presidency alive, IF they get elected. Joe is already showing obvious signs of dementia, and I’d bet Bernie is not far behind. (The Guardian)

Moving the Goalposts

Dumocrats don’t like to lose, and they come up with the most outlandish means to give themselves an advantage their opponents cannot overcome if they can’t win under current rules. Which is why former AG Holder is pushing the idea that Supreme Court Justices should be limited to 18 year terms. So they could appoint more liberals to the Court and guarantee a liberal majority so they could continue to win in the courts what they can’t win in elections and legislation. His earlier idea was to “pack the court” by creating more Justice positions on the Court. FDR (a Dumocrat) tried that, and failed. So did Lincoln—and he also failed. When they can’t win under current rules, they want to change the rules to give themselves an advantage. That’s the way they work. They don’t always succeed, but they always try. Supreme Court Justices have a lifetime appointment—so they cannot be swayed by politics, nor intimidated by such threats as Senate Minority Leader Chucky Schumer recently, that two of them “would not know what hit them” after they supported a decision with which he did not agree. It is that lifetime tenure that prevents them from worrying about such threats. (The Dirt Sheet)

Today's Gun Save

Anti-gun fools say it never happens. They say concealed carriers are more likely to shoot themselves than anybody else. They say that the average person carrying a gun NEVER is able to stop violence from being committed. They're WRONG, as usual. And today's “gun save” proves it, yet again. I’ve been resisting reporting every instance of defensive use of a gun because there are so many, it’s actually boring. Readers don’t really want to read the same story over and over again, even if it proves their thesis that, contrary to the lies the anti-gun fools tell, somebody shoots a burglar or other kind of criminal, every day, somewhere. In this instance it is the same old story: a couple of goons decide to break into the home of a woman—somebody they consider to be an “easy target” for their robbery. Robbery, not burglary, because they know she is home, and they figure they can overcome anything she has to offer. WRONG! The upshot is, she’s okay. One bad guy, DEAD. The other probably still running. That’s in Atlanta. In St. Louis, the homeowner didn’t even bother to kill the bad guy. He just shot in the air and the burglar set sail for less dangerous areas. I don’t think his feet even hit the ground, all the way to the hills. (Atlanta Journal-Constitution)

She Won't Go Away!

Hillary is like the monster in horror movies. You think you’ve killed her, then she comes back and kills again. Hillary failed TWICE in efforts to gain the White House, and now the Dumocrats are trying to bring her back again, since they don’t really have any good candidates who might be able to unseat President Trump. Their “big hopes” are an old socialist and a feeble minded old man who used to be vice president, but who is rapidly “losing it.” So now they want to bring back an old grandma who lost twice. She couldn’t win in two tries, but they think she can win against a president who has brought the economy to boom proportions. Dumocrat politicians aren’t too bright, I guess. They’re “grasping at straws” in their effort to “get rid of” their nemesis, President Trump. They’re constantly bringing back old, failed concepts, so I guess old, tired candidates are to be expected. And they can’t figure out why they’re now relegated to “the back bench.” Hillary couldn’t win an election for dogcatcher, but you won’t be able to convince a Dumocrat of that. They think she can “save them,” and they’re wrong. But they’ll never know that until she loses yet another election for them. (Just common sense)

Sick of Lying Democrats

Dumocrats LOVE to accuse their opponents of what THEY are doing. They push them to a response to their tactics, then criticize them for their response. Example: Their “lapdog media” Makes it impossible for President Trump to get his message out, then criticize him for “going around them” on Twitter. Now, after THREE YEARS of insults, false accusations, and lies about him, they are now criticizing him for “thinking the way to win is to insult, accuse, and lie.” Their version of lying, of course, where you tell the truth that they don’t agree with. Like Nancy Peelosi tearing up a copy of his “State of the Union” speech before the nation on national TV then claiming she only did it because everything in it was a lie and the alternative was less polite.” Of course, she couldn’t come up with a single real lie that wasn’t a simple disagreement on policy. They do things like this and PRETEND to be “miffed” at his response, which is more than they expected, He is not your “normal politician” who just “takes it and goes on.” He retaliates, and they wet their pants. They just aren’t used to a politician who fights back, and who fights back tellingly. They lie about him every day, and then criticize him for fighting back. He’s winning, and they don’t even know it. They cheer and holler when socialist Bernie Sanders wins a caucus, not being aware that Bernie—and every other Dumocrat candidate is a “lost cause.” Dumocrats don’t have a chance in this upcoming election. He is going to “steamroller” them and send all their Dumocrats to the “back seats” of the Congress. They will not know what hit them the day after the election, and they may never recover. And good riddance. (Just common sense)

Banning Self Defense

If you live in Oregon, move out. That’s if you want to ever have ANY ability to defend yourself against a bad guy with his ILLEGAL gun. The law they want to pass virtually BANS guns in that state. They want to give a nameless, faceless bureaucrat the power to “give you government permission” before you can buy a gun. Never mind the Constitution recognizes buying and using guns for self defense as an “inalienable right,” not to be “infringed.” This law, if passed, IS an “infringement” on that constitutional right, and ought to be declared so, even before passage. The five-round magazine limitation, for example: the stories about bad guys taking five bullets and still coming makes it plain that this will not work. Every facet of this law makes it easier for a gunman with an illegal gun to victimize the law-abiding. Actually, EVERY anti-gun law does that. The anti-gun fools HAVE to know that, but they insist on making more and more of their useless, unenforceable laws. The upshot is, they are making it IMPOSSIBLE for the law-abiding to defend themselves. (OpsLense)

It's Really Sad

We’re down to only two Dumocrat presidential candidates now. One is an avowed socialist, the other is a dotty old man who can’t figure out why he should zip up his pants after going to the bathroom. He needs to be led by the hand to walk anywhere, and after 8 years of working beside Barack Obama, he can’t remember his name. Hell, he probably can’t even remember his OWN name! If he wins the nomination and Trump somehow falls dead so he can win the 2020 election, he will be but a figurehead, with other people running things in his name—until the inevitable happens—this man, who will be 80 soon, just will not be able to withstand then pressures of then presidency, and will die in office, leaving things to his VP, whoever that may be. I’m 82, and I wouldn’t want to be president, on a bet. I plan on living a log time, yet, and being president would guarantee me an early grave. Sanders, on the other hand, would make this into a socialist country, destroying what has made the United States the “destination of choice” for people from all over the world who want to better themselves. People here that are considered “poor” would be considered “filthy rich” in many other countries. Pray nothing happens to Trump, and that Pence runs and wins two terms after choosing a good VP to run and succeed him for another 2 terms. (Just common sense)

Security Guard Illegally Arrested

This guy obeyed every law, advised the cop he had a licensed gun, and he was using bullets that are clearly NOT “hollow points,” according to the state’s own web site. But they LOOKED LIKE hollow points, so the cop (one Louis Flock, a Roselle, NJ cop) arrested him, claiming he was using hollow points—which he was NOT. He arrested him one block from is home on a specious charge, which immediately put him out of work because, as an armed guard without a gun, he could not work. The security guard, Roosevelt Twine, is finding it impossible to find ANY kind of work while the charges are pending and, obviously, he cannot afford the attorneys who are representing him. Soon, he will not be able to support his family, and well may go to prison for several years, on this phony charge. This is how “gun laws” are enforced in the “People’s Republic of New Jersey.” His attorney has set up a “Go Fund Me” account in his name to help pay for things, including his legal fees. You can contribute by going to www.gogetfunding.com/roosevelt-twyne-legal-defense-fund/ .Hopefully, Americans will be as generous to him as they have been in other “Go Fund Me” cases so this guy can get himself out of this mess. (AmmoLand)

Stay Away From Hawaii

There may be a good reason for intelligent Americans to stay out of Hawaii soon. Hawaii State Representative Tom Brower (Dumocrat, of course) has sponsored a measure that would BAN anybody (including people legally in possession of a gun or ammunition) from bring them into hotel rooms. We need to stop doing business with anti-gun fools who get laws made to deny us our constitutional RIGHT to be armed for self defense. The way to self defense is NOT to disarm yourself and make yourself DEFENSELESS against all those who hold ILLEGAL guns out there. Hit them in their wallets. If those anti-gun fools are not intelligent enough to know that, we need to teach them. America will never relinquish our nuclear capability for the same reason. If we did not represent “mutual destruction” to our enemies, they would “nuke” us in a moment. The only reason they don’t, is because they would cease to exist in the next minute, and they know it. They FEAR our retaliation. It needs to be the same for potential gun criminals. They need to FEAR that their intended victim MIGHT be armed, and well able to handle them. That cannot happen if the laws disarm the law-abiding while ignoring the law breakers. (KHON 2)

Badmouthing the Economy

It’s all they have. They can’t deny that the economy is booming, so they tell us it’s a “bubble,” that “bad times are coming,” and they’re the only ones that can help. Never mind they have always PROMISED to help build the economy, but never have. Dumocrats like Barack Obama tell us to “get used to it” because a good economy is never going to come back, instead of doing what is necessary to bring it back. Then, when a Republican, especially Donald Trump actually BRINGS it back, all they can do is “bad mouth it,” hoping against hope for a general downturn they can blame on President Trump. Dumocrats have never done anything good for this country. They have always had ready excuses for the bad things that happen under their “control.” Every city they run is a cesspool. San Francisco is one of them, and has been for a long time. But still San Francisco politicians attempt to blame Trump for the stinky brown stuff that litters the streets—somethig they can’t seem to do anything about. Then there is the large “homeless community” they have PROMOTED by their misguided policies that contribute to the miasma. I hate it that my city, Denver, is one of those cities, and will soon suffer the same. (Breitbart)

Dems Good At 2 Things

Dumocrats are good at two things: One, giving away other people’s money to buy votes and; two, making laws to control other people’s lives. They’re pretty good as stealing elections, too, but not as good at that as at the other two things, as evidence the fact that they are destined for a very serious defeat in 2020—the biggest defeats they’ve ever suffered, which just might relegate them to a kinship with the Whig Party. Ever since Donald Trump came down that escalator and declared his candidacy for the presidency. Ever since then they have been so blinded by their hatred for Trump they have done everything wrong. Impeaching him was the best thing they could do for him, as it solidified him as the leader in the fight to “drain the swamp.” They’ve accused him of everything they could think of, true or not, mostly not. Unfortunately the “true part” was nothing they could “pin on him.” It was mostly just policy differences, which they pushed up to the level of an impeachable offense in their imaginations, to their own detriment. They have called him every name in the book and claimed to have sure evidence of his wrongdoing—which they never have had. They have made it easier to identify the “swamp dwellers.” They are the ones most hotly against Donald Trump. The ones working the hardest to “get him” before he “gets them.” But the harder they work, the closer he gets to “draining the swamp,” as promised. I predict they will continue their efforts to “get rid of him” after he gets re-elected, leading to their own demise. (Just common sense)

Anti-Self Defense

If one looks carefully at every anti-gun law now on the books in many states, and in the process of being passed into law in many others, one can only come to one conclusion: those laws are NOT “anti-gun” so much as they are “anti-self defense.” Each one of them is designed to make it harder, or impossible for a law-abiding person to get his/her gun in action fast enough to oppose an ILLEGALLY-armed criminal, who is not bothered to obey such laws. First off is the “gun-free zone” where the law-abiding leave their guns at home, while lawbreakers freely use theirs there to victimize them. “Safe Storage Laws” likewise make it hard, or impossible to get the guns in action while they do nothing to stop holders of ILLEGAL guns. Limited magazine size gets the law-abiding killed while reloading, while law breakers have no such problems. Background checks only list people who get their guns LEGALLY, ignoring those who get them ILLEGALLY. In fact, EVERY one of those laws apply ONLY to those who OBEY laws, and those are not the people who are the problem. I could go on and on, but my point is made. (Just common sense)

"Biden's Victory Transforms Race"

That’s what the liberal media says, anyway. So I ask: “Who cares?” Trump’s gonna bury the winner. I’m getting very tired of this incessant din of political lies being told by Dumocrats in their endless “debates” and lying ads, paid for by the gullible while Trump wins every Republican primary with 90% or more and the media ignores it. “Little Mike” telling us all about how HE “brought a great city back from a terrorist bombing” when all he did was continue what Rudolph Giuliani stared. He wasn’t even mayor when 9/11 happened. Then he tells us all about all the “good things” he did in New York in his three terms. Never mind a New York Mayor is only allowed TWO terms, legally. He “got around” that by running as an Independent the third time, and called that legal, “Crazy Bernie” talks about his admiration for dictator Fidel Castro’s education program” that increased literacy among his victims, so they could better understand his dictatorial diatribes before he murdered them. He really thinks socialism is a good thing for us, and says it, every day. It seems like this “campaign” is a permanent part of our life, with every outlet, including Fox running their drivel all the time. And after the next election, they will begin anew on the NEXT election campaigns and we will have to listen to the lies of the new candidates for whatever office they’re trying to gain. (National Review)

Success--Among Democrats

“Crazy Bernie” Sanders, and now “Ol’Joe” Biden have experienced some success—as long as they’re competing against only Dumocrats. But when they come up against a real opponent, they’re going to fold like an old, rusty pocket knife. The liberal news media have been playing up those “successes,” while downplaying or ignoring entirely the successes Trump has been enjoying in Republican events, where he has been winning with 90% or more against mostly unknown (because they couldn’t possibly win) Republican challengers. Dumocrats speak before hundreds and the media shows only close-up shots to make it look like more people. Meanwhile, every Trump rally is attended by hundreds of thousands, with more thousands outside because there is no room for them. Dumocrats get millions of dollars in “donations” while Trump gets HUNDREDS of millions in donations. Although I can’t for the life of me understand why people spend millions to get jobs paying only a couple hundred thousand dollars, including expense money. In any case, I’ll be glad when it’s all over and Trump has won re-election—which I think is a foregone conclusion. Maybe that will shut up those lying politicians, at least for a while. (Just common sense)

Gun Control Imbeciles

That’s what they are. It is the most obvious thing in the world to those with any intelligence, at all. The entire idea of gun control is based on a fallacy. That you can actually eliminate all guns from our society by simply making a law. The very idea that this will eliminate “gun violence” is similarly imbecilic. Also imbecilic is the idea that you CAN eliminate all guns. All you can do is eliminate most of the LEGAL guns from society because only honest people OBEY laws. Dishonest people do not. They routinely ignore every “gun control” law passed by ignorant legislators, and the numbers of the guns they hold are in the MILLIONS. They create lists of gun owners that only allow them to find the user of a gun in a crime IF that person got his gun legally. Criminals in prison for more serious crimes, who have no reason to lie, willingly tell us they mostly got the guns they used in their crimes illegally. Limitations on the capacity of magazines is equally imbecilic, as all it does is make the law-abiding into “easy targets” for those criminals, who don’t obey laws. So what are they gaining, except to make it easier for the law breakers to victimize the law-abiding? (Just common sense)

Biden Is "Flyin' HIgh!"

He just won about everything in sight, after years of not being able to win a primary at all. He thinks—and the Dumocrats agree—that this means he has a chance to be elected president, but it does NOT. It means he is a little better than the other Dumocrats (left), but just wait until he runs up against a real candidate, in Donald Trump. That’s when it starts to END for him, and all the rest of the Dumocrats. “Little Mike” Bloomberg recognized the futility of his run for president, in spite of all the money he threw at it, and has quit, after just a couple of primaries since he started “throwing money” at the presidential race. Just a day before that, THREE Dumocrats “wised up” and pulled out, including the other billionaire in the race. They finally figured out that if you have nothing else to offer, money will not buy you the presidency. The liberal media is making a “big thing” of it, as if it meant they had a “snowball’s chance in hell” of getting by Donald Trump, with all the good things he has made happen. The liberal media tries to hide all his good works from the electorate, but they know. They know when there is more money in their paychecks, and it keeps on coming. It’s an impossibility to win an election against a president with so many victories to his credit—victories in which we all share. (NBC News)

"Trump Is Corrupt!"

“Crazy Bernie” Sanders, the presidential candidate who wants to get rid of prisons and let crooks loose on society while taking money from those who EARN it and giving it to those who don’t, at a rate that will bankrupt this country says, “Trump is the most corrupt president we’ve ever had!” In reality, President Trump is the LEAST corrupt president we’ve ever had. He has not fallen for their scams and schemes BECAUSE he is honest—and they’re not used to that because they are NOT. He has brought the economy back when their “darling,” Obama said it would never come back, that we should just “get used to a bad economy.” Every “indicator” shows the economy is SOLID, and getting better every day. The stock market is surging to record high levels and EVERYBODY is making a LOT of money—not just the rich. Unemployment levels, in all cases, are at record lows and employers can’t find eligible employees because they all have jobs if they want them. Dumocrats hate that, when a Republican causes it. They want to paint a picture of “doom and gloom” so they can PRETEND to make things better. Everything a Dumocrat says is likely to be a LIE. If we listen to what they say. With that as a “filter,” we can understand them. (Just common sense)

"Shut Up, Doc!"

Liberals are putting pressure on doctors to ask their patients if they have a gun or guns as part of their “work-ups.” This, they have no right to do! The medical profession can try and make “gun crime” a “medical problem” all it wants, but it’s not. And asking their patients if they have guns is NOT part of their “medical history,” no matter how much the anti-gun fools want it to be. What I’m going to do if my doctor asks me such a question is tell him it’s none of his business. If he persists, I’ll find another doctor. I assume part of it is that the doctor will tell someone if he gets a positive answer. that’s an invasion of privacy and a violation of medical ethics. I also presume that, if this question becomes common, soon the politicians will want to make truthfully answering that question mandatory, with punishment to be added if the patient lies or refuses to answer. Things like this are usually “one step at a time,” with this being the “first step” toward doctors letting the politicians know, by law, if their patients have guns. (Boston Herald)

Realized Their Mistake

The Stock Market has apparently realized the mistake they made in their panicked selloff over the Coronavirus, and we have experienced the biggest single gain in history as they atone for their mistake before the Dumocrats could gear up their effort to blame Trump for the fall. All of them made the biggest gains they have ever made, to make up for the significant drop the market sustained after the Coronavirus became “a thing.” It’s too bad the Dumocrats weren’t able to act quickly to blame Trump for the losses so they would suffer the embarrassment of being so terribly wrong. But of course Dumocrats are never embarrassed by being wrong. They are so wrong, so often, and they just ignore it and go right on being stupid. We know they were “gearing up” to blame Trump because that’s what they do. Blame Trump for everything bad that ever happens to us, but they were “saved by the bell” when the Market “came to its senses” and stocks rose quickly enough to equalize the losses of a few days before. (Just common sense)

Same Ol' Same Ol'

Here come the Russians. Again. And who is the amazingly intelligent (sic) politician who is alerting us to this? The same one who tried to push the old idea that the Russians were working with Trump to get him elected the first time, and failed, “Pencil Neck’ Adam Schiff(ty). They can’t come up with anything new so they recycle the old scams that didn’t work the first time. And, of course, they expect them to work this time. Of course, there’s just enough truth in this scam for it to be swallowed, hook and line, by all Dumocrats. Russia IS working to get Trump re-elected—and they’re working to help socialist Bernie “Wild-Hair” Sanders, too. But not working WITH either one (well, maybe Bernie). However, that doesn’t actually matter. What they’re really working for is to “sow the seeds of chaos” in our elections. That’s what they’ve always been working for, in ALL our elections. The communist Chinese have been doing it, too. And for the same reasons. They’re both jealous of our successes, using a system they not only hate, but just don’t understand, in the bargain. So they want us gone—or operating under their failed system, too. The N. Koreans are doing it, too. And many others, too numerous to count. (Just common sense)

Liberals Are Outraged!

So what? Who cares what gets liberals outraged? Liberals get outraged any time they are proven to be wrong about something—anything. This time it’s because a woman, who was a legal “concealed carrier” shot and killed a would-be robber at a bus stop in Chicago. He pulled an illegal gun on her and she shot him to death. It took him a while to die though, and the cops found him on his mother’s doorstep, where he died. One liberal used the “time-honored old saw” that robbery should not be a death sentence. But it should, if the robber was threatening the would-be victim with death. THAT does call for a death sentence, if the victim has the means to carry it out. This was the editor of Think Progress, an obvious liberal rag, who apparently thought she should just give him all her money and maybe let him kill her. That’s how liberals think. If the gun is legal, it should not be used. If it’s illegal, it’s okay. That editor says she should have just let him rob her, and both could have survived. Really? What if he decided to take her around the corner and rape her? Or just shoot her anyway because she didn’t have as much money as he thought she should have had for him to steal? He makes a big thing of his age: 19. But, 19 or not, he had a gun in his hand and was ready to victimize this woman when she killed him. This should happen a lot more, and maybe stupid kids like him would go into other kinds of crime—or maybe not go into crime, at all. The Hot Air writer says he’s not suggesting this kid had to die. But I am. He chose his life of crime. Some people just don’t deserve to breathe the same air as honest people, and his was one of them. Dana Loesch says, “Make predators afraid.” And I agree with that, wholeheartedly. (Hot Air)