Does Anybody Believe Farrakhan Any More?

My BS Meter goes off regularly whenever Farrakhan opens his mouth. The only thing that makes it go off more often is when Obama opens HIS lying mouth. With Obama it is a concerted effort to make fools of us. With Farrakhan it is sheer STUPIDITY. He says all these stupid things (with all his scowling thugs behind him) regularly because he BELIEVES his bullsh-t. He’s not only a “black racist” and a “spreader of racism,” he’s stupid, as well. We need a lot fewer of his type; and I don’t mean black people; I mean STUPID people with big mouths, of whatever color. Now he says Jesus was a Black Muslim and other stupid stuff. And some people still believe his bullsh-t. (The Blaze)

The Most Ignored Amendment

Amendment 28: "Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States ." Obama was finally asked the question that has never gotten an answer recently, and he chose to ignore it, never answering: “Would you give up your health care and submit yourself to the system you are pushing onto the American people?” It was put in more polite words, but as usual, it did not get an answer. No more so than when it is asked of Senators and Representatives. This is one of the MOST ignored Amendments in the Constitution. And most Americans don’t even know it exists. (Just common sense)

Obama Will Say and Do Anything

“Lying. Dissembling. Peddling half-truths. Redefining words. Taking credit for something in which he had no part. Those words/phrases describe what President Barack Hussein Obama has said or done and is now saying or doing.” One example is his pushing of the “Warren Buffet Rule.” That’s based on “dissembling.” Dissembling is a LIE based on misinformation. The misinformation in this case is that Warren Buffet’s secretary is taxed on her EARNINGS from her job, which is a lot higher rate than Buffet is taxed on his PROFITS and CAPITAL GAINS. The “dirty little secret” is if his secretary sold her house and profited from it, she would pay taxes on that sale at the SAME RATE as he pays. That’s the lie. She is eligible to pay at the SAME rate in a similar situation. Obama says lowering the marginal tax rate was supposed to create an economic boom, but didn't. Hey, Barack, it DID. It caused sufficient increase in the economy to almost DOUBLE the "tax take." But don't tell that to Obama or anybody who supports him. They won't hear it. (W. A. Beatty/American Thinker)

They Want A "Free Ride"

That’s what all the “demands” of the “Occupy (Wherever)” fools amount to. They don’t care who pays for it as long as it is not themselves. They want their “free ride” to be paid for by OTHERS. They want to have “their fair share” of OTHER people’s labors. “As Spring begins to bloom [and the weather warms up –RT], the radicals are crawling out of their caves and making their presence felt. While ‘Occupy’ has been unusually quiet over the past few months [when it was too cold to “occupy” anywhere –RT], groups are starting to pop up and remind people that they are still around. Take, for example, Occupy Chicago, which held a march over the weekend.” Why Chicago? Because it is the hometown of their “founder,” Obama. How transparent can Obama BE? (Glenn Beck)

How Soon Will This Be Here?

Italian Mayor decides it’s illegal to . . . DIE. It amazes me what politicians think they can do. Unfortunately for this mayor two people violated his directive within days, and now he has to figure out how to punish them. This sounds like something Obama would LOVE to impose on us, but he can’t figure out a punishment, either—and without a punishment attached to such a law, it means nothing. Oh, I know; they could confiscate the property of those who violate this stupid law by dying, But what if they have no property? They could punish their descendants, but what does that do to the lawbreakers? (The Blaze)

Why So Hard to Beat Obama?

I’m listening to many people (on Fox News, fergawdsake!) say Romney’s going to have a hard job beating Obama. That the “Obama camp” says Romney is, to them, “a joke” and they see no problem beating him. Why then, are they spending MILLIONS of dollars taking out ads in an effort to “kill Romney?” Why is it so hard to beat a man whose policies have caused us to spend more money than there IS? A man bent on DESTROYING this economy and making this into a socialist country? A man who has appointed DOZENS of “czars” to do his bidding without having to be approved by Congress? A man who has exercised DICTATORIAL powers in his FIRST term? Whose past is “wreathed in clouds” of mystery because he has “frozen” access to any means of finding out ANYTHING about him? A man who WILL NOT release his REAL birth certificate to prove he is an American citizen when American citizenship is a REQUIREMENT to even BE PRESIDENT? A man who denies that we're even in a war with radical Islam and won't even let members of his administration say so? A man who FAVORS Islam in everything he does regarding radical Muslims?

A man whom all but his henchmen agree MUST be removed in order for us to survive? A man who has PROMISED to "bankrupt the coal industry," an industry we MUST have if we are to continue to have electricity, and without having ANYTHING to replace it. I think it’s all Obama’s doing. He has presented such a (phony) “united front” that he has people convince that it will be hard to unseat him when it will not be? Is he “whistling past the graveyard? Is he FRIGHTENED that he will be soundly defeated, yet afraid to admit it? I think he is, and that he will be SOUNDLY defeated in the general election, though I’m not sure how much better Romney will be. Though ANYBODY will be better than Obama. The "rent is too damn high" guy from the last election who gave us a lot of laughs) could beat him. Frankly, I’m surprised he hasn’t been assassinated before now. Maybe it’s the insurance policy he has in all the liberals who follow him in line. If we’re smart, we can get rid of him without assassinating him. Hopefully we can send him back to Chicago with the rest of the “Chicago thugs” with whom he’s used to being associated; wait a minute! He brought them with him and made them into his “czars!” He left, or sent others back to Chicago to “rule” in his absence. (Just common sense)

"I'm Cutting Through the Red Tape"

After blocking the Keystone Pipeline bringing oil from Canada, Obama is now trying to take credit for that part of it he COULDN’T stop from being built, from Oklahoma to the Gulf of Mexico. The fact that he had nothing to do with it doesn’t seem to bother him. He goes right into “the belly of the beast” and claims responsibility for something he first tried to stop, but couldn’t. Everybody there when he made this speech knew he was LYING, but he doesn’t care. He got his LIE into the news cycle and people who don’t pay attention to politics, therefore know nothing, will believe him. The problem is, these people, while ignorant, still vote. That’s how he got to be president in the first place. (Fox News)

"Education Should Be Free"

That’s what the idiots who went into Santa Monica College chanted before cops pepper sprayed them. Really? Who should provide this free service? Should people be FORCED to teach them without pay? In buildings that cost money to build? I’ve heard this song before, most recently from the “Occupy (Wherever)” movement. What it boils down to is a “free ride” at the expense of others. Other organizations call for “a Fair Share.” A fair share of what? And from whom? “Fair Share” is “code” for socialism. Whenever someone calls for a “fair share, I cringe, because I’ve heard this spurious cry before and it is a false notion. NOBODY is entitled to “a fair share” of what YOU earn. The only “fair share” people have coming is what THEY earn. Of course, the organization going under the pseudonym “Fair Share” today is a thinly-disguised “re-elect Obama” outfit POSING as someone who wants a “fair share” of YOUR earnings. Obama wants ALL of your earnings. (My Way)

Energy Sec. Gives Himself An "A"

Which proves his total ignorance and incompetence in this office. The man who rides a bicycle to work for show while his wife drives a massive gas-guzzler behind the scenes gives himself an “A” for a job incompetently done. If he had managed to get the gas price reduced by ONE PENNY I might give him a “B-.” but in no way would I ever give him any kind of an “A”. Where does Obama GET these DOLTS? There must be a “Society of Idiots” from which he selects his staff. (Conservative Byte)

Fifty Year Old Manure Spreader - $1

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) Fifty-year old manure spreader. Not sure of brand. Said to have been produced in Kenya. Used for a few years in Indonesia before being smuggled into the US via Hawaii. Of questionable pedigree. Does not appear to have ever been worked very hard. Apparently it was pampered by various owners over the years. It doesn't work very often, but when it does it can really spread the manure and sling it for amazing distances. I am hoping to retire this manure spreader next November. But I really don't want it hanging around getting in the way. I would prefer a foreign buyer that is willing to relocate this manure spreader out of the country. I would be willing to trade this manure spreader for a nicely framed copy of the United States Constitution. Location: Washington, D.C. (Author Unknown-Ad found on Craig's List)

You Can't Talk About It!

The records are sealed. Obama doesn’t want you to have access to the records about murdered Border Control Agent Brian Terry. This from the latest “most transparent administration in history.” What is he trying to hide? We already know about his failed “experiment” that involved SUPPLYING guns to Mexican drug cartels so we could “trace their movements” that resulted in unknowable numbers of murders (with American guns), and one in particular: that of Terry. Will his direct murderer ever be caught? Doubtful. His INDIRECT murder has just SEALED those records. (Weekly Standard)

"I am An Example of American Exceptionalism"

That’s what Obama thinks about himself. And he’s right. But not in the way he thinks. He’s an exceptionally clever con man and has been responsible for the biggest con ever, in the history of the world. That IS “exceptional. But he’s not exceptional in any other way. Actually, he’s kinda STUPID in most things, though he certainly does know how to con money out of Americans by the TRILLIONS of dollars. He has spent more of our money than there IS. More than ALL previous presidents put together. He still thinks his health care swindle law will be upheld by the supreme Court after he threatened them. I hope he will get a surprise when they finally reveal their decision; the first of several surprises, I hope, culminating in his FIRING from the job he illegally holds. (Washington Times)

NBC "Edited" 9/11 Tape

They left out only a few words, but those words were important. The words left out made it look like Zimmerman was only thinking the man he was talking about “looked bad” because he was black, which made him look like a racist. They left out the dispatcher asking if he was white, black, or Hispanic. They did it to introduce an element of racism into the story to make the story “more interesting.” Just as another network set off explosives in a Chevrolet truck to make it LOOK like that truck would “self-explode.” There are many proven examples of lies told by the liberal media to support their predetermined liberal position. But NONE for Fox. Yet liberals in and out of the media STILL say Fox lies while there STILL has been no proof of it. (Rush Limbaugh)

Judge Takes Offense At Obama Challenge

U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge Jerry Smith took offense at Obama’s speech, questioning the Supreme Court’s authority to reverse his health care swindle law. Seems to me that Obama doesn’t realize that the Supreme Court is there for ONE purpose: to judge the constitutionality of laws made by that “elected body.” To deny it has the right and power to do so signifies Obama’s complete ignorance of how this government works. For him to treat the Supreme Court in this manner shows a complete IGNORANCE of constitutional law. And this from a “constitutional scholar.” If a “constitutional scholar” knows so little about the Constitution, where did he get the right to call himself a “constitutional scholar?” The students who learned about the constitution from him should demand their money back. (Mail.com)

Illustrating Absurdity With Absurdity

There is no better illustration of that than the problem the government now faces with their plan to use tobacco taxes to pay for “education AGAINST smoking. Their plan is working. But not in the way they intended. They never intended for their “education” to significantly reduce tobacco usage so they would continue to have a “money tree.” But is IS working. Fewer people are smoking now than ever before, and that translates into less tax revenue coming from tobacco taxes. They don’t know what to do. It’s a case of unintended consequences. Something that happens frequently to the government, but never seems to dissuade them from their absurdities. (Rush Limbaugh)

Why So Many School Shootings?

The recent mass shooting in Oakland at a small Christian school has again raised the questions: “Why so many school shootings? And “What can we do to stop them?” The answer is easy, though today’s liberals won’t hear of it: Stop telling crazy shooters there will not be ANY guns in the school in the hands of people they don’t necessarily KNOW to be armed. In the hands of people licensed to carry concealed, and trained to use them if necessary. They could be janitors, teachers, principals, even counselors. But NOT people these crazies would expect to be armed, so they can’t “target” them early on and get rid of them, such as armed police officers. At Columbine, the shooter did just that, making that armed person’s contribution minimal, at best, if not killing them outright. Banning guns outright except in the hands of known security officers tells those who want to do so to “Come on in and kill us. We have no guns.” This is ignorant, even a STUPID policy and has contributed to these shootings. (CBS News)

Proving New York Times Bias

The New York times is strangely biased (as is Obama) toward Islam and AGAINST Christians. I’m not just SAYING this. They, themselves proved it by running an anti-Catholic ad, but REFUSING to run a similar anti-Islam ad. Frankly, I don’t think they should have run EITHER, but to REFUSE to run an anti-Islamic ad after RUNNING an anti-Catholic ad plainly shows their bias—or their shivering fright at the prospect of making Muslims mad. I vote for the former until they can show me the latter is the reason. Otherwise, I have to assume the old “double standard” that has “reared it’s ugly head” is true here. (The Blaze)

Ignorant Ideas

What are these politicians thinking? How STUPID are they? Mandating insurance companies insure people for PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS! That’s like insuring your car for accidents AFTER you’ve wrecked it! Or insuring your horse against theft AFTER it has been STOLEN! This, like their law forcing lenders to loan money to people who cannot repay it is an exercise in STUPIDITY. But these people force it on insurance companies with a straight face, just as if it were a LOGICAL thing. It is NOT. It is evidence of IGNORANCE of how the world works—and this in the people who are RUNNING things. How do we get such people running things? By “not paying attention to politics” and voting anyway. Does ANYBODY really know ANYTHING about Obama’s past? Where he was born, and if he adheres to the Muslim philosophy whether he IS a Muslim, or not? We know NOTHING about this guy who came out of NOWHERE and with the liberal media solidly behind him beat a woman who is just as bad, but whom we could at least say we knew something about. Why did we elect him to the highest office in the land without knowing ANYTHING about him? We’re learning about him now, not through his past: he has seen that his past is “locked away” forever.

We have learned about him through his ACTIONS, which we abhor. We will kick his rear end out in November, but that may be too late. Elite liberals think Obama is not a socialist. We think otherwise because we don’t have our blinders secured tightly in place as they do. They say “Only irresponsible fanatics carelessly throw around such epithets.” But is that true? Or its it simply liberals, who think they’re better than us “muggles,” “poo-pooing” what others think. We think he is a socialist because he has SAID he is a socialist. Because everything he has done since being inaugurated promotes socialism. The evidence is IN. He IS a socialist. There is no doubt about it, and those elite liberals are full of dung. They WANT socialism because they intend to be in positions of power when it comes, so they don’t have to EARN money to get the benefit from it. They know you don’t have to OWN the money to benefit from it. They hope to be like those “commissars” in the old Soviet Union running around in state-owned luxury cars, back and forth between their sumptuous homes to their sumptuous “offices,” all paid for by the “collective,” but which they treat as their own, while the “serfs” stand by, hat in hand, and envy them. (Forbes)

Obama's "Flat Earth Society"

Obama equates people who don’t believe his bull sh-t about the “energy problem” with being members of the “Flat Earth Society. But in reality, it is OBAMA who is a FOUNDING MEMBER of the Flat Earth Society and he proves it every day with the ignorant crap he preaches. I can’t remember a more STUPID president during my lifetime. Not even Jimmy Carter (and he came mighty close). Until Obama came along, Carter was my model for a stupid president, but Obama has FAR outstripped his stupidity. (The Blaze)

"New Black Panther" Crime

The “New Black Panthers are CRIMINALS. They have been for a long time. Probably before Obama’s attorney general refused to prosecute them for intimidating voters in the 2008 elections because they were “my people.” Now they have put out “a hit” on George Zimmerman with their “Dead or Alive” poster offering $10,000 (now a MILLION dollars) for George Zimnerman “DEAD OR ALIVE.” That’s inciting people to MURDER and the people involved in the New Black Panthers putting that out should be arrested, prosecuted, and imprisoned, forthwith. Does anybody think that will happen? Not with Obama in the White House and Holder as AG. These people are on THEIR SIDE, so they’re not going to do anything about just about anything they do, legal or ILLEGAL. If somebody murders Zimmerman, will anybody prosecute any New Black Panther in his death? No. Obama will prevent it, as most thugs protect those who do their bidding. (The Blaze)

What's Wrong With Wal-Mart?

Wal-Mart is a good company. Even if they DO sell mostly communist China slave-made goods in order to get their prices down to the point Americans will actually BUY them. They TRIED the “made in America” thing when they first started, but it didn’t work. Americans, who DEMAND high salaries, will not pay the prices required when the goods are made in America. So while paying high prices required by the high wages demanded by Americans, they could not compete with companies who imported their goods from countries whose people would work for a lot less, plus from a country where all the workers were slaves, anyway, and HAD to work for low wages, communist China. Now the SAME Americans who demand ever higher wages will not pay for American-made goods because prices are too high accuse Wal-Mart of “outsourcing” the manufacture of their goods while paying low wages themselves.

What did they EXPECT? And the accusation about paying low wages is a LIE. People flock to Wal-Mart’s employment office ANY time there is an opening because they pay a “living wage” WITHOUT being TOLD to by a union. They bring hundreds of new jobs to ANY community to which they move, but many locals obstruct them on these specious motives. Instead of obstructing them, they SHOULD be WELCOMING them and all the new jobs they bring while paying lots of taxes. They wouldn’t stay in business if people didn’t shop there. And why do they shop there? Because they keep their prices low in SPITE of hell. People come up with all kinds of phony excuses why they don't like Wal-Mart, but they shop there, anyway, once Wal-Mart gets by their detractors and actually get their store opened. The "mom and pop" store owners who get run out of business can go to work for Wal-Mart and make more than they ever made while in business. (Forbes)

Obama "Whips Up" Racism

Along with every other liberal race-baiter out there, including Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, “Calypso Louie” Farrakhan, and many others, they are making a “mountain out of a molehill” about the killing of a black teenager in Florida. I don’t know ALL the details, and nobody else does, either. The incompetence of the cops “investigating” this situation has GUARANTEED nobody ever will. In any case, George Zimmerman has been “judged” guilty of premeditated murder by everybody concerned, right up to the President of the United states, who took the time and trouble to CALL the parents of the “victim,” something that, while not unusual for this president, is not proper in a local incident. While he didn’t make a stupid remark, as he did in the case of a black professor who was arrested in the break-in of his own home, just the fact of WHO he called tells us his opinion, all the “race-baiters” mentioned above have jumped in the fray, condemning Zimmerman to death, even if an “investigation shows he is innocent of guilty intent.

The “New Black Panthers” have “put out a hit” on Zimmerman, and if he IS found not to be guilty of a crime likely will not change their $10,000 offer for him, “”DEAD OR ALIVE.” (I will watch carefully to see if Obama or his black attorney general charge them with a crime for ordering this murder or if they will reject any charges against them, since they are “their people"). If people would just SHUT UP about this (which will not happen), maybe some REAL investigation could be done and some real facts be unearthed. Although any facts finding Zinmmerman not guilty of a crime will not be believed by these “race-baiters.” I looked at just the CNN web site and EVERY story on the side was about this shooting, and ALL were against Zimerman. The unappointed judges have decided he's guilty of murder, without facts. (Just common sense)

Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish

Israel has killed some more Palestinians while the Palestinians are trying hard to kill as many Israelis as they can. The Palestinian are “at war” with Israel, no matter how much they deny it. Why else would they daily lob rockets indiscriminately into Israel territory? The Palestinians send out pictures of “families” crying over the loss of their loved ones, usually standing right beside the rocket launchers they use to bombard Israel. I have no mercy for them. Maybe the news media should publish the pictures I KNOW exist of Israelis sobbing over their loved ones that were killed by a Palestinian rocket? Israel is simply defending itself against the constant unwarranted attacks from Palestinian territory. And don’t try and tell me Israel started it. I know better. I read history. Real history. Not that biased crap fed Americans by their liberal media. (Freedom’s Phoenix)

Individual Right?

A history of the Second Amendment will show you it recognizes An INDIVIDUAL right, not a collective one. Having the right to carry a gun for self defense does not require membership in a government recognized “militia.’ Every citizen was ASSUMED to be a member of the “militia” and required to help the “recognized authority” enforce the law. Somewhere that idea has been lost and they now say the only reason for the “right” to carry a gun is to defend ourselves against the GOVERNMENT, which they don’t want. All the cops seem to be be able to do today is RECORD the crime after the fact, and MAYBE apprehend the criminal. But if everybody carried a gun, it would be a much more dangerous profession to be an armed robber. (Patriot Action Network)

Energy Sec Rides Bike to Work

But what Stephen Chu doesn’t tell us when he assures Congress he doesn’t own a car is that his wife DOES (wonder who bought it). She drives a gas-guzzling BMW while he rides his bike to work to make a big show about how “energy conscious” he is. This is a typical Obama administration LIE by omission. This car was reported to get 18 MPG when it was new, and now is reported (by her husband’s agency) to get 21 MPG. Did he fiddle these figures to minimize the damage if we found out about his wife’s car? Probably. During his testimony before the Congress, he complimented the failing Chevy Volt, saying: “it’s a good car (then why doesn't he own one?).” Yeah, if you never go more than 40 miles at a time and don’t care about having it sit for 8 hours at a time to recharge. Oh: did I tell you that the government-owned General Motors has stopped making the Volt (they SAY “temporarily”) because of lack of viable sales numbers They blame Rush Limbaugh for that, forgetting that it has NEVER been a big seller because of its fantastically high price and VERY limited range. Who wants an electric car that costs $100,000.00 and will only go $40 miles between “feedings?” In any case, this is how they fool you, a little bit at a time. (The Daily Caller)

What Kind of FOOLS Are They?

What kind of fools do they think WE are? Some time ago the then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said of Obama’s health care swindle act, “We have to pass this bill . . . to find out what’s in it.” What? That’s not how we do business in this country. Here, we find out everything there is to know about an act before we vote it into law. Does she really think we’re stupid enough to buy this bull? Maybe she’s going on the fact that we elected a president so we could find out who and what kind of a man he is, We’re now finding out both, and we don’t like what we’re finding out. But it’s way too late to find out these things. Liberals in our government have said many things just as stupid as this, but nobody (not even the press, who should be calling them on it) calls them on it. What kind of fools are WE if we don’t get rid of fools like Pelosi and Obama and their friends at the first opportunity? This statement is something that would be said by a dictator who doesn’t CARE what we think. (Just common sense)

Energy Sec Rides Bike to Work

For show. But what Stephen Chu doesn’t tell us when he assures Congress he doesn’t own a car is that his wife DOES (wonder who bought it). She drives a gas-guzzling BMW while he rides his bike to work to make a big show about how “energy conscious” he is. This is a typical Obama administration LIE by omission. This car was reported to get 18 MPG when it was new, and now is reported (by her husband’s agency) to get 21 MPG. Did he fiddle these figures to minimize the damage if we found out about his wife’s car? Probably. During his testimony before the congress, he complimented the failing Chevy Volt, saying: “it’s a good car (then why doesn't he own one?).” Yeah, if you never go more than 40 miles at a time and don’t care about having it sit for 8 hours at a time to recharge. Oh: did I tell you that the government-owned General Motors has stopped making the Volt (they SAY “temporarily”) because of lack of viable sales numbers. They blame Rush Limbaugh for that, forgetting that it has NEVER been a big seller because of its fantastically high price and VERY limited range. Who wants an electric car that costs $100,000.00 and will only go $40 miles between “feedings?” In any case, this is how they fool you, a little bit at a time. (The Daily Caller)

Muslims Destroy Hero's Graves

And they get mad if we so much as draw or print a PICTURE of their “hero. If we so much as SAY the TRUTH about Mohamed and his crimes, they go KILLING mad. What a bunch of HYPOCRITES! You just can’t take such people seriously, though we have to, because all they seem to want to do is KILL us. It’s even in the Koran to “convert” people to Islam WHETHER OR NOT THEY WISH IT. It’s even okay for a Muslim to LIE to “serve Allah. But if we so much as tell the truth about their atrocities, they get “offended.” It pains me to see Muslim HOLY MEN standing about encouraging this mob. Probably some of the same "holy men" who COMPLAIN about us “desecrating Allah.” This is one of the most brazen things I’ve seen them do. I could not even watch this whole clip. Had I been there, these thugs would all die. (Conservative Byte)

"Investigating" Muslims

New York City is “watching” Muslims closely; surprise, surprise! And they’re getting in trouble for it with some of our own people (liberals, mostly, but other kinds of dupes, too) If I lived in New York City, where MUSLIM terrorists MURDERED 3,000 innocent people without warning, I’d want to “watch” Muslims closely, too. I wasn’t old enough when the Nazis were doing their “dirty work” before WWII, but I’d bet Americans were closely watching Germans at the time. FDR even “rounded up” Japanese and put them into “concentration camps” because they could recognize a Japanese on the street. Today they can recognize Muslims on the street, but they’re not “rounding them up” to be placed in “concentration camps.” They’re simply keeping a close eye on them so that if they DO something that indicates they’re terrorists, we can “scotch” their schemes. Yes, there are many “good” Muslims here, but if they are NOT Muslin terrorists they have nothing to fear. But to keep a close eye on Muslims is only common sense and logic since, while not ALL Muslims are terrorists, ALL those terrorists who have wreaked havoc all over the world ARE Muslims. (Freedom’s Phoenix)

How Many Fools Gather Together?

The answer to that question is easy. Go to the nearest OWS (Occupy Wall Street) gathering and count them. Those there are FOOLS to a man (or woman). What they want is simple: a “free ride” at other’s expense. Which translates into collectivism (otherwise known as socialism, communism, Fascism, Nazism, progressivism, and many other names, with only cosmetic differences between them, a system that has VICTIMIZED millions of people, and not just the people they feed off of.). They want others to pay for their college, and others like them say “music should be free,” forgetting entirely that musicians put their heart and soul into that music and deserved to be paid. People who want a “free ride” want others to pay for their every expense without the bother of having to work for it. Like the communist motto: “FROM each according to his NEED, and TO each according to his ABILITY,” MAKING need A DEMAND upon the EARNINGS of those who can, and WILL earn their own way. Those able-bodied people who demand that are EVIL and lazy. They “feed” off the work and sweat of others. They are worthless and a drain on this society and always will be. (The Blaze)

Anti-Gun Laws Contribute to Mass Shootings

There was another mass shooting on a campus the other day; where it is KNOWN that guns are not allowed to be in the hands of honest people to allow them to defend themselves against such attacks. Such shootings and killings will not only continue, but will increase in numbers and intensity as long as we continue to deprive honest people of the right to carry the means of self defense, their own guns. It can only get worse. The “anti-gun fools” think making a LAW against gun ownership will stop CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING will obey one that says they can’t be armed. Anti-gun laws do one thing: create an abundance of unarmed victims that illegal gun carrying criminals can exploit, while crazies go into crowded spaces with their ILLEGAL guns and start shooting everybody in sight, with no fear that someone close by might have their own LEGAL gun and shoot them dead. That’s the SINGLE RESULT of keeping guns out of the hands of honest people so they can’t defend themselves. And don’t tell me the cops can do it; they can’t. All they can do is document the crime and identify the body or bodies killed by illegal criminal-carried guns AFTER the fact. John Lott (“More Guns, Less Crime”) said that if armed criminals feared death at the hands of an armed potential victim, they’d go into another line of work. That depriving honest people of the means to their own self defense was tantamount to saying to criminals, “Come on and victimize us. We won’t shoot you, we have no guns.” That’s common sense and logic, but is denied by those who want to get rid of all guns. That will never happen, but they deny that, too. They even deny the very EXISTENCE of common sense and logic! (University of Chicago)

Media Lies Again

They’re portraying Obama as the “gas price savior” because he “announced” he was going to release oil from the Strategic Oil Reserves. He hasn’t even DONE it yet, but they’re saying he’s going to be responsible for a drastic reduction in gasoline prices. What they don’t say is that releasing these reserves will make the difference of a few pennies for about 30 days. Then they’ll go back up again, probably higher than ever. What he could do that would REALLY bring them down is to GET OUT OF THE WAY of drilling and new refinery building (There hasn’t been a new one built in more than 30 years, and the old ones are beginning to crumble). Those that are still in business can’t get enough oil to refine. He says we’re “drilling more than ever,” which is a typical Obama LIE. (Rush Limbaugh)

And They Wonder Why It's Getting Worse

Obama Will Make Taxpayers Guarantee Mortgages Without the lenders Checking Borrowers' Incomes or Employment. Just like before the 2008 election when the 1976 law that forced lenders to loan money to deadbeats was first in force. It’s STILL in force with Fannie and Freddie again keeping the lid on until they need another “bump” in the bad economy. They FORCE them to loan money without regard to their ability (or non-ability) to pay it back, while now FORCING the taxpayers to guarantee the loans. The economy predictably gets worse, allowing Obama to say the free market doesn’t work so I’m going to change to socialism. Making loans to people who cannot pay it back is a “recipe for disaster” and one that forced the banker in Ayn Rand’s prophetic “Atlas Shrugged” to “zero out” his businesses and disappear to avoid being FORCED to do it. He started his own little town in the mountains of Colorado (he could do it in the time this story was set) run on his own ideas of economics, aided by John Galt’s “perpetual motion machine” invention. But we don’t have such a giant of finance today who can start a “strike of “the men of the mind” and destroy the liberal’s economy so we could “start over” with economic ideas that WORK. (CNS News)

I Guess I'm A "Hater" Then

Southern Policy Law Center (SPLC) says, “If you’re not left-wing, you’re a hate group.” Oh gee, I guess this organization has the right to label everybody else but themselves . Frankly, from what I see, it’s the LEFT that is the “hate group.” There; I have as much right to brand others as a “hate group’ as the SPLC does, so I guess the left IS a “hate group.” Where the hell does this group get off branding people as a “hate group” because they don’t agree with them? This a sign this organization needs to be voted out of office as soon as possible. Oh; I forgot: you can’t vote a “hate group” out of office. You can just refuse to send them any more money and they will “wither and die.” (World Net Daily)

UN Wants to Regulate Anything It Can

Anything it can con its members into ceding to them. Regulating planetary food and water sounds innocent enough, but what happens if, while “regulating” planetary food and water, they decide to put “strings” on it? If they “regulate” it, and withhold food and water until we do what they dictate, what does that make them? Don’t give them any more power than they now have. To do so is to create your own disaster. In fact, we need to get RID of them, altogether. They’re certainly not good for anything. They claim to be here to “keep the peace” in the world, but have they? Any time? What about the countries in which UN operatives have been screwing little girls under duress? What about the other atrocities UN people have committed? (Cowboy Byte)

Feds Block Taxas Law Requiring Picture ID

I have to show a picture ID to get a driver’s license; to buy insurance; to buy a pack of cigarettes; to get into certain buildings, INCLUDING Eric Holder’s Justice Dept. building. To do many things: so many things, in fact, that I no longer even think about showing it. Everybody gets ONE VOTE. But nobody is required to show “proof of ID” to exercise that right; to PROVE they are, in fact, who they are, and to guard against voting many times. A person could go from voting place to voting place voting many times, and I’m sure some do, without this requirement, which is simply a way of VERIFYING their identity. Except in Texas (and Indiana), where there’s a law requiring picture ID to be allowed to vote. Or there was, until Eric Holder, an un-elected bureaucrat, decided to BLOCK that requirement. What are the Democrats AFRAID of? That stealing elections will be harder for them to accomplish? They SAY it would be “hard on Hispanics.” Do they mean those Hispanics who are here illegally who CAN’T legally GET a picture ID? (Reuters)

What's Next?

Gays want to use the term “marriage” to describe their “arrangements.” I have nothing against their “arrangements,” but not under the name, “marriage.’ They’ve been offered everything they want EXCEPT the use if the term “marriage” and have turned it down. Some people say if that’s allowed, what’s next? “Marrying” their dogs? Apparently, one guy in Canada thinks that would be a good thing. He calls his dog, “my girl.” I’ve heard of guys calling their girls “dogs,” but this is ridiculous. I look for guys like this to be pushing for laws to allow them to “marry” their animals, soon. (The Blaze)

No Guns Involved

The anti-gun freaks hate it, but the most recent school killing happened in Chicago, WITHOUT a gun involved. So they can’t use it in their passion to get rid of every gun they can in the hands of good, honest people so they can use them to stop such things as this school killing, with a KNIFE. I’ve always wondered about the stupidity of people who think a LAW will stop a CRIMINAL, who breaks the law DAILY, from having a gun. All their laws do is give criminals a steady stream of unarmed victims for them to use their illegal guns to victimize.(Breitbart)

"Equal Justice" Under the Law

Last fall, a Muslim attacked a Pennsylvania man named Ernest Perce who had dressed up like Mohammed for a Halloween parade. The attack was caught on film, witnessed by dozens of parade watchers, and verified by a policeman. The Muslim was charged. But when he was brought before Cumberland County Judge Mark Martin, the judge dismissed the assault charges against the Muslim and dressed down the Pennsylvania man for being insensitive to the Muslim religion. Not only did Martin rule in favor of the Muslim attacker, he lectured Ernest Perce for insulting Islam: "Islam is not just a religion, it's their culture. It's their very essence; their very being… And what you've done is, you've completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very, very, very offensive. I find it offensive." Would this judge say anything to a Muslim who trashed the Christian religion? I don't think so. He's too stupid. I find his finding offensive. (Thanks to Conservative Byte.com)

What About Americans Killed By Taliban?

The Taliban in Afganistan have vowed “revenge” for the Afghans supposedly killed by an American soldier whom Afghan “witnesses” (who might be Taliban themselves) say just “started killing people for no reason.” I doubt it. He was probably defending himself from a Taliban attack and accidentally hit some women and children while doing so. Or the Taliban themselves killed them so they could blame it on that soldier. This is classic PR stunt of the kind usually used by the Taliban and other kinds of Islamic terrorists (Sorry, PC Police, I use my own choice of words. I don’t allow others to choose them for me.). My question is, how do you tell the difference between Taliban and “civilians?” You usually can’t, except the Taliban are probably shooting at you. (Detroit Free Press)

Fast & Furious

This should be a defining moment in politics and the men responsible FIRED, including Obama: the government “running guns” to the Mexican drug cartels and getting a Border Patrol agent KILLED. This is NOT “just” a political thing. It’s Brian Terry’s DEATH, and Obama is ultimately responsible because it couldn’t have happened without his knowledge and approval, no matter how much he may deny it—if he’s ever asked, which I doubt. The thug he’s got in charge of the DOJ says when he found out about it he STOPPED it. But when did he find out about it? Didn’t something like this REQUIRE his approval BEFORE it was done? If he didn’t know about it, he is INCOMPETENT, as is Obama. But neither will ever take the blame for this man’s death. Mark it. (Mary Chastain/Big Journalism)

Congress Passes Obama Impeachment Bill

But there has been no action on it i the Senate. I guess they’re hoping they can stall it in the Senate until after the election, hoping Obama will win and he can better quash it. One thing always in Obama’s favor is the tendency of Congress to “drag their feet” on anything “controversial.” But what’s “controversial” about impeaching Obama? The subject of this impeachment is but ONE reason we have to impeach this travesty of a president. What about spending more of (our) money than there IS on his “flights of fancy” masquerading as “green energy companies? Companies who quickly “take the money and run? Companies whose people have donated millions of dollars to his campaigns. Obama’s scam is so transparent we can all see how he is paying back his contributors by giving BILLIONS of OUR money to them while they go bankrupt and never pay it back while we can’t touch them because of the bankruptcy laws. Well, he DID promise to be “transparent.” And why is our source for this a patently conservative one? Because you’ll never read about this in the liberal media. (Conservative Papers)

What's WRONG With These People?

We’re suffering under extremely high gasoline prices and environmental idiots are still working to BLOCK any attempt to drill, anywhere, any time. In Erie, Colorado, a town so small they have a double-sided sign reading “Welcome to Erie” on both sides, they’ve banned “fracking” anywhere near town. Other towns in Colorado, including Longmont and Boulder have done likewise. I expect such stupidity from the “People’s Republic of Boulder,” but not from Longmont and Erie. I’ve always thought they were smarter than that. But apparently they aren’t (The Denver Post)

Town Hall Spikes Arpaio's Report

I can’t figure it out; why would Town Hall, a CONSERVATIVE outfit, “spike” Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s report that PROVES the “birth certificate” Obama released was a FORGERY. On the one hand, they rail against Obama and his refusal to release many of his records of his early life, including his birth certificate, but on the other hand, “spike” an article that PROVES Obama’s up to something and really MIGHT not be eligible to be president of the United States. I don’t know if they DID “spike” it, but if they didn’t, they should take steps to return it to their site. It’s VERY popular and its disappearance raises many questions—ones I’d rather not have to ask of the site that hosts one of my blogs. (World Net Daily)

Is Watching Muslims Wrong?

Muslim extremists murdered 3,000 innocent Americans on September 11, 2001. Since then, many people, almost ALL of them IDENTIFIED as being Muslims, have tried to murder more “in the name of Allah.” There have been countless murder attempts, some successful, some not so successful, with the perpetrator shouting “Allah is great!” At Ft. Hood, a Muslim SOLDIER took a gun and killed a lot of people and was even carrying a card saying, “Soldier of Allah.” A Muslim attempted to murder a Danish cartoonist for drawing a PICTURE of Mohammed. A Muslim tried to murder the POPE. What ELSE do we need to justify keeping a close eye on Muslims in this country? They’ve proven a penchant for using “deep cover agents” to kill people. People who are told to do nothing untoward, make no noises about “Jihad,” etc. until the time comes for them to act, who when captured spout Muslim extremist phrases. Watching Muslims is NOT a bad thing; it is COMMON SENSE and logic. Watching them closely is the only thing that has kept them from “overrunning” us. We’re not “rounding them up” and putting them in concentration camps as we did the Japanese under liberal FDR. We’re merely “keeping an eye on them.” There’s nothing wrong with that, and never will be, so long as militant Muslims continue to kill innocent people for not believing the same way they do. (Daily Mail)

In The Hospital

Been there since last Tuesday. The “official diagnosis” was, “idiopathic abdominal discomfort,” which translated means, “He had a stomach ache but we can’t figure out why but we’ll give it an official-sounding name.” It went away on its own after they subjected me to every painful and intrusive test known to man, and a few that haven’t even been invented yet. So I’m okay. The liberals can’t claim I’m out of business as they’re trying to do with Rush.

Media Lies About Rush Sponsors

They say he has lost 28 sponsors. That’s an out-and-out LIE and misinterpretation of the facts. He originally lose THREE sponsors and TWO of them have asked to come back. But was that reported? Was it also reported that he has three NEW sponsors since this debacle? I think this is just something else the liberal media has decided to “jump on,” true or not. It’s too bad our supposedly trusted media no longer think facts are important. I take ANYTHING the media says about Rush with a BIG “grain of salt. It’s usually a lie. The figures in this case came from George Soros’ Media Matters, whose output is ALL a lie. There’s even a rumor that Rush will be “suspended” for one week. That’s another lie. He'd have to “suspend” himself. (Rush Limbaugh)

How Cocky Are They?

The “Occupy (Everywhere)” movement and Muslim extremist leaders have come together for a strategy meeting and rally. They probably call it something else, but that’s how politicians (and that’s what they are) operate. Have meetings to screw the pubic right out in the open while calling their meetings something they aren’t, to fool the people. But the very fact that they are holding a meeting together tells me a lot about the OWS bunch. Not that I’m surprised. I’m only surprised they didn’t even try to keep their collaboration secret. The OWS bunch wants a “free ride” and the Islamic terrorists want to foment as much trouble as they can. So who’s surprised they’re now working together? (World Net Daily)

Why Isn't This Guy Unemployed?

Chris Matthews once famously said listening to Obama speak “sent thrills up my leg.” that was the best way I know to reveal his bias. Now he’s saying all Americans should get such a thrill when listening to Obama speak. What I want to know is, does he have an orgasm? And should we? How does somebody this STUPID keep his job? Because his bosses are just as stupid. Employing people as stupid as this guy is reveals just how stupid his employers are. They can no longer hide it after this fool blathers. (The Blaze)

Truth Is NOT "An Incindiary Attack"

The truth is NOT an “incendiary attack,” no matter what politicians like Mitt Romney call it. When he DOES start telling the truth about Obama he will insist on calling it something other than an “incendiary attack,” but that’s what it will be under his original definition. This is what I hate about politics: they redefine words to suit themselves, and we let them get away with it because too many of us just don’t pay attention—so we buy their bullsh-t. (Rush Limbaugh)

Mosques Nearly Double In US Since 9/11

This scares the hell out of me. It tells me the Muslims are trying to take us over by having children all over the place so they will soon OUTNUMBER us. What that happens, they can vote to do anything they want after a while. We need to start realizing that Islam is NOT a religion. It is a political philosophy MASQUERADING as a religion, and is bent on taking us over, one way or the other. If they can’t do it by force of arms, they’ll do it by outnumbering us in our own lawmaking bodies. That scares me. Because there isn’t much we can do to stop them under our current rule of law. And they realize that. So they just keep on having kids IN America and one day they’ll have enough votes to do what they wish. Fortunately for me, I’ll be dead (I hope) by then. (World Net Daily)

Chicago Gun Sales Up

They got rid of the ban on gun sales to private individuals in Chicago and gun sales went up accordingly. Even though they coupled it with onerous licensing, the number of licenses “granted” increased, a lot. People were arming themselves to defend their homes and families against illegally armed predators. But did you notice that the item announcing it made NO mention of whether the crime rate went up or down? Not surprising. Anti-gun crazies don’t want you to know that the violent crime rate probably went down. It usually does when honest people are allowed the means to their own defense. (CBS Chicago)

Narural Causes?

Andrew Breitbart is dead; of “natural causes.” At 43. Do you really think his death was from “natural causes” at age 43? Breitbart was a “thorn in the side” of most liberals, and I’m sure they are “dancing in the streets” at his death. But you know there ARE ways to kill somebody while leaving no trace. Is that what happened here? Will we ever know? We’re waiting for the autopsy, but will it tell us anything? Doubtful. People who are “thorns in the side’ to liberals sometimes end up dead from suspicious causes. God knows, enough of them died when Clinton was president, just before they were to testify to crimes he had committed. Rest in peace, Andrew. We hardly knew ye, but we loved what you did; those of us who love truth, that is. As an example of what to expect from liberals, I got a Tweet from a liberal troll fool pretending not to be liberal saying he's "dropped better turds than Breitbart was. (Newsday)

Obama Using IRS to Intimidate Tea Partiers

How brazen is this? Obama has directed the IRS to require Tea Party members to “jump through several hoops” including sending printed copies of their Facebook pages. They wanted information about their politics, contributors, and even family members. It’s a “sneaky trick” to “bury them in paperwork” supposedly to legitimize their actions. I’m just glad I don’t ask for permission to do what I do, but nevertheless, I expect a visit from the IRS one day with demands for information I’m not willing to give them. (Fox News)

Obama Admits He's A Kenyan

Watch this video and see it with your own eyes and hear it with your own ears from his own mouth. Obama is NOT an American citizen and he IS a Muslim. Why the hell do people who count ignore this and allow this imposter to continue to pretend to be the president of the United States? One day, after all of Obama’s cronies are gone from the government, every law and regulation promulgated and signed into law by Obama will cease to exist. Today, he ridicules ANYBODY who even QUESTIONS his citizenship and religion, calling them “birthers,” as if that were something that made them insane or just stupid. He thinks that will prevent people from doing it, and it has, for the most part. He has “produced” a false birth certificate showing the hospital of his birth to be one that didn’t even exist when he was born and his father being called an "African," a term not in use then. He continues to block release of ANY documents that might tell us something about his early life, including his school records. Why do we allow this imposter to do these things? Are we THAT stupid? I don’t care what his religion is, except for the fact that I don’t want a Muslim signing our congressional acts into law. But I DO care that he is a self-admitted Kenyan citizen PRETENDING to be an American citizen so he can PRETEND to be president and move us ever closer to socialism, which is his idea of a perfect system. Watch this video before our dictator has it taken down. they'll call me a racist for this post, but I don't care about their lies. (YouTube)

Complete Overreaction

This is the kind of overreaction we can expect as the Obama administration moves closer and closer to a dictatorship. A child draws a PICTURE of a gun and her father is STRIP-SEARCHED by “school authorities” who aren’t smart enough to know how STUPID they are. We’re moving closer and closer, folks. What possessed them to think there was ANY kind of “probable cause” to arrest and search a law-abiding father in front of his little girl and strip search him? We can expect more and more of this STUPIDITY in the future. Like the cartoonist who was “detained” at an airport for commenting on how easy it was for a Muslim woman to get through with her face covered. These are the stupid things bureaucrats do when they think the government will back them. (The Blaze)

Obama Shows His Ignorance (Again)

He showed his ignorance many times with comments he has made, including the one last week where he said he has “five years left” as president. But mocking the GOP on the gas price issue is yet another example of his abysmal ignorance and yet another reason why he should never have been elected president. Another is his adherence to collectivism (socialism), which bodes ILL for America. If he has his way, America will replace Russia as the “example” of, and showcase for collectivism, as long as it lasts, though I don’t think it’ll last as long this time as it did in Russia, where they were not used to freedom before the communists came. Americans are used to being able to make their own decisions, not have some nameless, faceless bureaucrat in the Capitol do it for them. Of course, he can kill off all those who oppose him, as Stalin and Lenin did, but maybe not fast enough since most of them, unlike in Russia, have their own guns. (Cowboy Byte)

Drug Tests for Welfare Recipients?

They’d better polish up their expertise for this. People on welfare have nothing constructive to do, as do those who work for a living. So they do stupid things like use drugs. But they’re EXPERTS at fooling drug tests. One of the common excuses government bureaucrats use is their workload. They always talk about how heavy their workload is. So that means the feds are going to have to hire a lot more people to do these drug tests and read them, which will be good for the employment numbers. Although government jobs don’t help the economy nearly as much as jobs in private enterprise does. (Cowboy Byte)

"I Will Bankrupt The Coal Industry!"

That very statement reveals Obama’s complete IGNORANCE of how the energy industry works. And he’s PRESIDENT! He’s SUPPOSED to understand these things. The fact he doesn’t reveals his INCOMPETENCE to BE president. The coal industry is ESSENTIAL to the electric power industry. There is nothing else on the horizon to fuel their electric generators. Yet Obama wants to bankrupt the coal industry. Is this man STUPID, or just insane? I can’t understand his thinking processes, if he actually HAS any. (Cowboy Byte)

The World's Policeman?

Should we be “the world’s policeman?” that depends on what the world does, doesn’t it? Bashitr Assad is murdering thousands of his own people in his effort to stay in power Ahmadinijerk is talking about “pushing Israel into the sea” while working like a beaver to create his own nuclear bomb with which to do it. N. Korea has nuclear capability and is run, like Iran, by a madman. Russia is building their military at a breakneck pace while we look the other way since “communism failed” there. But DID it? Notice the same people who were in power when it was a communist nation are STILL in power today. They just SAY they're not communists any more. Their very leadership today were leaders in the old communist regime. DID communism fail? Or did they just rename it? They are STILL a socialist regime, and communism is but ONE kind of collectivism. Socialism is another. Both are based on stealing from those with the ABILITY to earn their own way for the benefit of those who AREN’T. SHOULD we be “the world’s policeman?” Somebody has to. We’re the biggest and most powerful (so far). Why not? What if communist China was "the world's policeman?" (The Guardian/Michael Tomasky)

Just Write A Check!

Warren Buffett, billionaire who was miserable about his secretary having to pay taxes at a higher percentage than he, talks a lot about rich people like him paying more taxes. NJ Gov. Chris Christie got tired of it and told him to just “shut up and write Obama a check.” So far, I don’t think Buffett has done so. In fact, he’s way behind on paying the taxes he DOES owe. His comment about his secretary is a lie too, as are the comments of most liberals. His secretary (who is salaried) pays at INCOME TAX rates while Buffett, most of whose “earnings” are capital gains, pays taxes at a far lower rate. He doesn’t tell you that if HE was on a salary, HE would pay taxes at the SAME PERCENTAGE as does his secretary and if she earned money as capital gains, she would pay for that at the same rate as he does. This is the kind of fact-twisting liberals are known for. (The Blaze)

The Best Gun Salesman in America

It’s Obama. Did you know that December 2011 saw the biggest increase in gun sales EVER for a single month? That states reporting show an increase of almost 50% in the number of gun sales? That Federal Excise Taxes collected on gun sales have gone up 48.3%? How about Rueger’s gun sales going from $117 Million to $232 million? Or Winchester’s gun sales going from $431.7 million to $572 million since Obama was elected? Since he was elected, applications for concealed carry permits rose from46% to 161%. Looks to me as if Americans are increasingly seeing a need for self defense since Obama got in the white House. So Obama, who says he “hates guns,” is the reason for a huge increase in gun sales. (The Blaze)

What Contraception?

Liberals are going nuts over the allegations that Republicans and conservatives want to ban contraception—what? What Republican has EVER said a WORD about contraception except in answer to a question from a liberal newsjerk? It was started by George Stephanopolous’ question to a presidential candidate (out of the blue) about it, and has “moved on” from there. The truth is, the whole thing is a “put-up job” by Democrats to divert our attention from the REAL issues like Obama spending more of our money than there IS, then printing more and more of it, thus sending our great-grandchildren into more debt when they’re BORN than most people previously had at any point in their lives. Such things as Obama taking away right after right, under the table, hoping we won’t notice until AFTER the election so his prediction that he has “five years left” will come true. (Just common sense)

She Thinks She's A Queen

One month after her Hawaiian beach vacation, she (Michelle Obama) is taking yet another vacation—this time a skiing vacation. I know most of the expenses for these vacations are being borne by Obama, but not those for her security. Those are borne by the taxpayers. I’m sure if you added up the total amount just for security for her many vacations (and his) it would come to billions of dollars wasted. That’s why I’m going to start calling her “Marie Antionette.” And this has nothing to do with her color. I judge people as INDIVIDUALS and I judge this INDIVIDUAL to be arrogant and a spendthrift, as long as it’s somebody else’s money. (Human Events)

Mutual Assured Destruction

(MAD) kept the old Soviet Union from attacking us with their nuclear arms because both sides knew that both countries would be destroyed if one nuclear missile were fired at the other. That doesn’t work with N. Korea or Iran if one or the other or both get the capability to reach American cities or property with nuclear missiles because there is no “mutuality” about the destruction that would follow. If either one fired a missile at American property, only one country would soon cease to exist soon thereafter. Yes, N. Korea DOES have nuclear capability, and soon Iran may, also. But both are far from having the capability to hit any important American targets, and they both know that to attack us is to DIE in the next few hours: only as long as it takes our missiles to reach them. The part that is unclear is caused by the fact that both countries are run by madmen who don’t much care about that. Like Red Skelton said, as “the mean wittle kid,” “If I dood it, I get a whippin . . . I dood it anyway.” So we need to do everything we can to inhibit Iran from even GETTING a nuclear capability while doing everything we can to convince the madmen in charge that an attack on us would mean the END of their entire country, themselves included. Being a dictator is nice, but only if you’re alive and have a country to rule. (How Stuff Works)

Global Minimum Tax?

The OMB (Office of Management and the Budget) wants a "global minimum tax. The obvious agency to impose it would be the United Nations. First of all, liberal dogma (for the most part) doesn’t include the idea of a global minimum tax because that means the 50% of Americans who pay NO TAX will have to pay it. But more important, the United Nations has no POWER to tax us in any way. Not now, not EVER. It’s bad enough that America gives BILLIONS of tax dollars to this depraved organization, at all. It talks and talks, and does NOTHING good. Example: it’s recent condemnation of Syria for murdering its citizens, after which Syria killed even more citizens the next day and nobody did anything. Nobody listens to the United Nations. Saddam Hussein didn’t, and the only reason he is now dead is the United States had enough of him and “took him down,” as they probably will with Assad and Ahmadinijerk one day. Some people SHOULD be killed, and Bashir al-Assad is one of them. (Voice of America)

Did He Go Too Far?

Leslie Marshall, radio personality, criticizes Newt for saying “Obama is the most dangerous president we’ve ever had. Obama cannot even SAY “Islamic terrorist.” He forbids his administration’s people to even mention it in real words. He does everything he can to MINIMIZE the threat Islamic terrorists represents to us. He spends more of our money than there IS and shows no sign of slowing down in his “drunken sailor spending.” He takes over right after right, violates the Constitution with abandon, keeps us from drilling for oil on our own soil while gas prices approach $4 a gallon, and she still supports him and is OUTRAGED that Newt doesn’t. It is this kind of fool that keeps the likes of Obama in the running, and I sincerely hope the American people are too smart to listen to her. (Just common sense)

Iran: "Let's Talk"

What stupid politicians Iran thinks we have—and they’re right. Our politicians have no idea that an outfit like Iran—or N. Korea—or the Taliban—or Islamic terrorists under ANY name—say they “want to talk” so they can stall us to give themselves more time to carry out their nefarious plans. That they NEVER really “want to talk,” except as a device to divert us until THEY’RE ready to make a move. N. Korea used this scam, and now they have their own nuclear device. What makes our ignorant politicians—who are “dancing in the streets” at the thought of Iran “wanting to talk,” think things will be any different this time? Why can I, a simple old man, see this while our “smartest people in the world,” do not? (Red State)

She Either Has Alzheimer's Or Is Senile

Sheila Jackson Lee says she can’t recall anyone EVER attacking a president like they do Obama. How about how Obama attacked, and still attacks Bush? How about Reagan? Or Lincoln? Or several others I can remember? And I’m old enough to have Alzheimer’s. She says Republicans “want to take away love and charity just for the pure satisfaction of beating Obama.” As to attacking presidents in the press, somebody needs to remind her of the Reagan years, AND the Lincoln years. and then there are the Washington years. Attacking a sitting president is routine, and smart ones don’t think anything about it. But Lee is known for the STUPID statements she makes and no one is surprised at what foolishness comes out of her big mouth. Somebody needs to wrap some duct tape around her head right where her mouth is and hope it holds out under the pressure of her stupidity. What she ignores is the many GOOD REASONS for getting rid of Obama. It’s not just for “the fun of it.” And if she doesn’t know any better, SHE is the one that is stupid. (Glenn Beck)

Ain'tcha Glad We Got A Constitution?

In Sweden, if they even HAVE one, it isn’t helping home schoolers who want to keep their children’s minds out of the hands of the government and are teaching them at home. The government is ORDERING them to send their children to state-run schools so they can “properly condition” them to be good socialists. They haven’t been able to do that yet in this country, but they are working hard to gain that power. If they ever do, they will turn out “good little socialists” every day. They’re doing it now to all the kids now going to state-run schools in the United States. People wonder why their children, who have listened to them about what’s WRONG with socialism as children, fight them on it when they get out of school; that’s why. They’ve been thoroughly brainwashed. Thank God I went through school before the socialists gained the power they have, now. And they hate it when I tell the truth about what they’re doing. They’ll be glad when I’m dead, or the time when they figure out a way to silence me and all the others who tell the truth about them. (Home School Association)

Waters Goes Bananas

She gets up in front of the Democrat State Convention in California and says, “Boehner and Cantor are demons! And I don’t want to see them or any other Republicans again in life!” What a FOOL this woman is! I’d like to honor her demand, but unfortunately killing people like her is illegal. It’s fools like this who are making the laws we must all follow today. No matter the law is so screwed up today. I wish it was easier to get rid of such fools once they reveal themselves as she has. She continued: “These are legislators who are destroying this country rather than bringing us together, creating jobs, making sure we have a good tax policy, bringing our jobs from back offshore, incentivizing those who keep the jobs here. They are bringing down this country, destroying this country because again they’d rather do whatever they can to destroy this president rather than for the good of this country.” No, they’re not. They’re trying to SAVE the country from such as her and Obama, who has spent us into oblivion and is working tirelessly to destroy this country's economy. Is there any wonder we want to get rid of him? And we need to get rid of the likes of Maxine Waters, too, for our own good. (The Blaze)

They're Not Smart Enough

And they prove it by getting their panties in a twist over a piece in the PARODY paper, The Onion. "The May 2011 Onion article details the opening of a 'sprawling abortion facility that will allow the organization to terminate unborn lives with an efficiency never before thought possible.' The fictional Abortionplex includes more than 2,000 rooms dedicated to the procedure, as well as 'coffee shops, bars, dozens of restaurants and retail outlets, a three-story nightclub, and a 10-screen multiplex theater - features intended not only to help clients relax, but to foster a sense of community and make abortion more of a social event.' " this just proves that Republicans can be as ignorant as Democrats. We should have a better method of “vetting” any candidate for any office to determine their intelligence. (American Thinker/Rick Moran)

Scalping Murdock

Leave it to Obama to make the most of ANY scandal he thinks he can “pin” on the owner of Fox News and enable him to discredit it. Several low-ranking REPORTERS in Rupert Murdock’s organization, NOT employed by Fox, did some things they shouldn’t have. Murdock immediately responded not only by firing them, but by shutting down their newspaper, too. Murdock neither knew, nor approved of what they did, but apparently Obama doesn’t care about that. He wants Murdock’s HAIR (what there is of it) so he’s out to scalp him. I don’t know if he will actually pursue legal action against Murdock in this country, but the very SUGGESTION of it, he thinks, will discredit Fox News, which is what he’s after. (The Guardian)

Is There Nothing LOW They Won't Do?

Now theOWS fools are throwing urine at people. Throwing urine and feces at people is something degenerates do in PRISON. It’s not something you do if you want to change people’s minds. It’s something you do when all you want to do is IRRITATE people, and that’s what they want to do. Did the guy who pulled down his pants on the curb in front of everybody and took a dump on the sidewalk think that’s something RESPONSIBLE people do? How about the people who “get it on” in their tents, right on the sidewalk? This OWS crowd is NOT a “legitimate” outfit, they are simply troublemakers sent by Obama, and should be treated as such: arrested, and given LONG prison sentences. Liberals say there’s no difference between OWS and the Tea Parties. Tea Parties have NEVER done the things routinely done by OWS people. What’s more, they know what they want; the OWS people don’t, except that it boils down to a “free ride” at someone else’s expense. (The Blaze)

Obama Staffer Lies--This Is News?

Obama’s new chief of staff flatly lied in a recent interview. He was asked about Harry Reid’s statement that we “didn’t need to pass a budget” by saying they needed 60 votes to pass a budget, KNOWING that if a filibuster went more than 50 hours on a budget issue, they could then pass it with 51 votes, which the Democrats have, and one more. What he DIDN’T say is that the DEMOCRATS don’t want a budget, so they use every lying tactic to avoid it. He used to run the Office of Management and the Budget, so he should know this, unless he is incompetent. Is he lying, or is he incompetent? (Breitbart’s Big Government)

If Iran Attacks America

There has a lot been written about what would happen if America attacked Iran. It’s all supposition. What will really happen if Iran attacks the United States directly is that soon after, Iran and its threat would cease to exist. And we woudn’t be asking anybody’s “permission” to overfly their country to accomplish it. Just try and stop us! So if Ahmadinijerk wants to kill himself and all his people, just attack us. Iran is a large country, land-wise. But it is small in many ways otherwise, chiefly in its thinking. It adheres to a fifteenth century way of thinking while seeing itself as invincible. It is not. It is not a pimple on the behind of America when it comes to military power and prowess. Good advice for Ahmadinijerk: sit down and shut up! If you don’t, your life expectancy is very short. Do something REALLY stupid and the life expectancy of your entire country and its ignorant jerks in black robes is also very short. (Just common sense)

Typical Power Grab

LA County has made it illegal and subject to a $1,000 fine to throw a football on the beach. The Constitution prohibits “cruel or unusual punishment” for ANYTHING, and this fits that description. They want people to “get a permit” if they want to do it. Which gives them the power to say “No.” It amazes me how many things that should be our right by BIRTH now require a “permit” or a “waiver” to do. Like not being FORCED to provide contraceptives when to do so is against your basic principles. Obama’s ORDER to the Catholic hospitals and other Catholic-owned businesses to provide contraceptives to its employees, even if to do so is AGAINST their deeply-held principles is yet another example of a power grab, this time by the president. He doesn’t have the power to GIVE such an order, NOR does he have the power to ORDER insurance companies to do so after people objected, just as LA County has no power to BAN footballs or Frisbees on the beach. But they TOOK it, anyway. If nobody stops them, they'll get away with it. (CBS Local)

$50,000 On Lingerie?

That’s what this story says, and I believe it. Michelle thinks she is “queen” of America and can spend taxpayer’s money any way she wants. Maybe it’s not taxpayer money she used to buy her lingerie, but I’m sure it cost us just as much for her to go where she bought it. The white House denies it, but then the White House quickly denies ANYTHING that might make the president look bad, true or not. Nobody ever believes the White House when they deny something because that is the “default position.” Even is the story is true. I swear, I’m going to start calling her “Marie Antionette.” That’s how she acts. She thinks money grows on trees since Obama was elected. (The Blaze)

Raping the Banks (Again)

Democrats raped banks and other financial institutions when they made that scurrilous law, the “Community Reinvestment Act of 1977” that FORCED lenders to loan money to everybody who asked, REGARDLESS of their ability to pay it back, an “exercise in financial madness that was GUARANTEED to create a massive financial crash from the moment it was passed into law, that Democrats could use to “take over the government’ without firing a shot.. They raped them again when they passed the “Dodd-Frank” bill into law (signed by Barack Obama) after Bill Clinton strengthened the original “Community Reinvestment Act.” And his AG, Janet Reno, threatened lending institutions with expensive, if futile, “investigations.” They blamed those victimized banks for the financial meltdown, accusing them of “predatory lending.” What? What is “predatory lending, and who profits outside of the political party that wants to use it to gain more power? Dodd and Frank were at the forefront in the defense of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the TWELVE TIMES George Bush and the Republicans tried to expose their scam before it was finally exposed and they were “shut down,” just in time to get many Democrats (including Obama) elected. Now Obama, still blaming the banks for what HE has created, is making even more laws to rape them again. (Wikipedia)

Russia Doesn't Care

Assad is MURDERING his own people by the hundreds, even thousands. But Russia doesn’t care; they’ve murdered MILLIONS of their own people in the past, and are still doing it, quietly. They are thugs, not politicians. Putin is “in charge,” and he is one of the chief murderers. When Russia was a communist country he murdered many as the head of their secret police, the KVD (it’s more recent name). He used to be president; now he is prime minister. Next he will be president again. Just as Obama would be whatever was the same as prime minister here if he lost the next election until he could run again for another two terms as president. Does anybody think the current president in Russia is not subject to the direct orders of this prime minister? Russia is slowly moving back toward the complete authoritarian regime they once had as America is moving toward its first since they were under the thumb of Britain. They didn’t learn from its (Russia's) collapse. Putin LIKES having “life or death power” over his “subjects,” as Obama will if he ever gains it. Assad is murdering his people, and Putin is supporting him. Surprise, surprise! (Mail.com)

RUSSIA DOESN’T CARE: Assad is MURDERING his own people by the hundreds, even thousands. But Russia doesn’t care; they’ve murdered MILLIONS of their own people in the past, and are still doing it, quietly. They are thugs, not politicians. Putin is “in charge,” and he is one of the chief murderers. When Russia was a communist country he murdered many as the head of their secret police, the KVD (it’s more recent name). He used to be president; now he is prime minister. Just as Obama would be whatever was the same as prime minister here if he lost the next election until he could run again for another two terms as president. Does anybody think the current president is not subject to the direct orders of this prime minister? Russia is slowly moving back toward the complete authoritarian regime they once had as Amerivca is moving toward its first since Britain. They didn’t learn from its collapse. Putin LIKES having “life or death power” over his “subjects,” as Obama will if he ever gains it. Assad is murdering his people, and Putin is supporting him. Surprise, surprise! (Mail.com)
http://www.mail.com/business/economy/1011990-russia-backs-assad-friend-arab-world.html#.7518-stage-hero1-2

Miscalculation

Obama miscalculated badly when he issued his dictate (order) that EVERYBODY (including the Catholic church, one of his biggest voting blocks in 2008) provide, at their expense (not his) contraception. He didn’t understand just how STRONG their beliefs were, and how far they would go to tell him to “go to hell”. Now the Catholic church, among many others, is telling him just that and DARING him to send them to prison, just as I will if his thugs ever come after me to buy his health insurance (What part of “can’t afford it” doesn’t he understand? Ordering me to buy it won’t change that.”) Now he’s considering offering “waivers” to outfits like the Catholic church if they come to him, “hat in hand,” and beg for it. It’s just another way to gain CONTROL over another segment of the population. He doesn't have the POWER to make them provide contraception against their principles, and doesn't have the power to make their insurance companies do it, either. (CBS)

Chicago Gun Sales Up

They got rid of the ban on gun sales to private individuals in Chicago and gun sales went up accordingly. Even though they coupled it with onerous licensing, the number of licenses “granted” increased, a lot. People were arming themselves to defend their homes and families against illegally armed predators. But did you notice that the item announcing it made NO mention of whether the crime rate went up or down? Not surprising. Anti-gun crazies don’t want you to know that the violent crime rate probably went down. It usually does when honest people are allowed the means to their own defense. (CBS Chicago)

GOP Using Democrat Tactics

They’re now ridiculing Romney as “Richie Rich” trying to buy the election. Unfortunately, much of that is true; he IS “trying to buy the election,” again spending a lot of his own money to overwhelm his opponents as he did in 2008. (Unfortunately, Obama has a lot more money --ours) But there are many OTHER good reasons to oppose his nomination to the Republican Party presidential candidacy. One being he is a LIBERAL. He tries to masquerade as a conservative, but nobody who is intelligent and pays attention believes it. I don’t care if he is worth BILLIONS; it’s not his money that bothers me, it’s his politics. I believe he’s in the wrong party. His politics should be in the Democrat Party. The GOP wants him to be nominated because “it’s his turn,” as it was with McCain and Dole. The only problem with that is he’s going to LOSE, as both McCain and Dole did, which saddled us with many more years of liberal governing. Ann Coulter is pushing him at the moment, but I think her every word in support of him is “tongue-in-cheek,” and it’s like Rush Limbaugh when he was pushing Hillary’s candidacy to prolong the primaries and force them all to spend more money. (Ann Coulter)

Texas Oil Boom

Didja read about this in the enemedia? No? And you won’t, either. Oh, you might see one or two stories, but not the media craze you’ll see about Obama’s doings (those they figure you’ll like, anyway). This discovery alone can eliminate our dependence on foreign oil, and I’ll bet the Obama forces are right now scheming to stop it, as they did with the Canadian oil pipeline. They just do not want an increase in our domestic oil production. That would make it look like the free market could do it without government interference, and they can’t have that. Notice the date on the newspaper. I saw that when it first came out, but have seen nothing about it since. Notice the emphasis in this NYT story is the appearance of a trailer park. (New York Times)

Eastwood Was Conned

That $14 million dollar Super Bowl ad made by Clint Eastwood, a well-known conservative actor/director, would never have been made if he had realized it was a blatant campaign ad for Obama, made by people who are ardent Obama supporters. Knowing Eastwood’s past, I believe that. Eastwood making that ad would be like ME making a similar ad. I’d have to be drunk or drugged. I like Rush Limbaugh’s parody of it better. Click the link below to hear it. (The Blaze)

Taxing the Rich is Stupid

Same song, different day. Obama has again said we need to tax the rich more so we can make up for the fact that he (Obama) has spent more money than there IS in his efforts to move this country closer and closer to socialism. And if you don’t know what socialism is, and why it’s bad for us, you’d better learn, and quick, before the next election. My own SISTER didn’t know until I laid it out for her. Now she’s the biggest anti-socialist there is while she loses her home to Obama’s silly economic policies. This is a woman who does NOT do stupid things, yet she’s losing her home because Obama’s policies made things so bad she could no longer afford it. There are not enough “rich people” in the WORLD to tax enough to make up for ONE DAY of Obama’s spending, and there never WILL be. He simply hates rich people, even though he is now rich, himself. He’s got his, now he wants to pull up the ladder so nobody else can come up. That’s ”class warfare,” no matter how much he denies it and ridicules those who accuse him of it. Gad, what a STUPID president we have! (Forbes)

Their Numbers Don't Add Up

They claim the unemployment figure is now 8.2%. Obama says there were several MILLION new jobs created; but there were not. They “fiddle” the numbers on a regular basis and claim certain “”formulas” such as “seasonal adjustments” allow them to do so. But even with those “seasonal adjustments,” they still don’t add up One of their “seasonal adjustments” is the “size of the workforce.” That means they can ARBITRARILY decide that 1.5 million people LEFT THE WORKFORCE (gave up looking), allowing them to release figures based on a SMALLER WORKFORCE, which means they can claim a smaller or larger percentage, based on that smaller workforce without creating a single job. Another example is Medicare Part B. I just got a summary of claims processed. It shows ONE doctor appointment at $190.00; Medicare approved $101.29 of that, but paid the provider only $81.03, leaving me owing $20.26. But what happened between $190.00 and the $81.03 they actually PAID the provider? Somewhere there, we lost $108.97. Where did that go? They SAY they pay 80%; but 80% of WHAT? The actual cost? Or what they “deem” to be the cost? The numbers just don’t add up in anything they do. But they’ve got a pat explanation for anybody who asks questions that is guaranteed to make your head spin. What this means is the government lies to you on a regular basis and has a built-in excuse that allows them to do so. But when you present some figures to them, they’d BETTER add up, or you might end up in jail. Even if they do, you STILL might end up in jail, or paying a fine. (Just common sense)

We "Scared Hell Out of Them"

After it was announced there would be a vote on an unconstitutional bill that would have allowed the government to interfere with the Internet generally, the Internet responded, and we “scared the hell out of them.” They pulled the bill for what they call a “rewrite” to remove the offensive portions. You know, the part that “throws out the baby with the bath water” they usually put in such bills, and which gives them a lot more power (under the table) than they’re entitled to. Yes, Internet piracy IS a problem. But they don’t need a law such as this to deal with it. (CATO)

Abortion IS Murder!

ABORTION IS MURDER: I’ve said this over and over, and nobody seems to be listening; or they want to kill the result of unprotected sex instead of using a rubber and don’t want to take away their ability to do that by facing truth. But the fact remains that abortion IS murder. It KILLS a breathing human being, albeit while still in the womb. I just watched a television feature starring a beautiful woman who is an “abortion survivor.” Her mother tried hard to kill her, but wasn’t successful. She is now a mother herself; a mother of a beautiful little girl who would not exist if her own mother had been a successful murderer. I probably know many people who are abortion murderers themselves, but they don’t talk about it, and for good reason: they know it’s WRONG, even if it IS legal. It was made legal by some politicians and a few black-robed dictators. It was never judged so by any Congress—only by nine old men (and a few women) in black robes. I think maybe even my own wife may have aborted at least one child. That’s the only reason I can think of for a “good Christian woman” to be able to get so angry at me for my beliefs. I know she did put at least one child up for adoption before she met me. But my beliefs have nothing to do with religion. They have everything to do with common sense and logic.

People in favor of abortion SAY it involves a “woman’s right to choose what to do with her own body.” It doesn’t. It has to do with the RIGHT of that innocent baby to stay alive. If what women do with their own bodies is so important, why do we put prostitutes in jail? Maybe one day somebody will listen to me and do something about this “mass murder” of innocent children. People who would not do anything to hurt a living baby favor KILLING them in the womb, for the parent’s CONVENIENCE. It’s as simple as that. Nothing more. Forget the polemics and rhetoric about “back alley abortions.” Yes, it isn’t pretty. But it can be prevented so simply by the use of a little piece of rubber or any number of other birth control methods that some people want to be banned. The simple argument is that fetus has a RIGHT to be alive. To kill it is WRONG, and that’s not a religious statement. It has the right to be alive, REGARDLESS of religion. If people like Bill Gates or Albert Einstein were aborted, the world would have missed out on a lot. If Adolph Hitler or Stalin, or Lenin had been aborted, the world would have been better off. But how would you know, at their birth or before, which they are? And who should have the power to decide? Personally, the only good I see from abortion is that people who kill their babies tend to be liberals, and what better way to reduce the number of liberals and socialists in the world? But I’m not willing to kill babies to accomplish it. (Just common sense)

"If They're Starving, Let Them Eat Cake!"

That’s what Marie Antionette said when somebody asked her about her starving subjects., thus showing her complete ignorance of life. Now we have Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia showing HIS ignorance by saying, “if they don’t like the political ads on TV, just turn it off.” A typical response from someone who “got his” and thinks anybody wanting more is just a “trouble maker.” What if I don’t WANT to “turn it off?” What is I find other things of value there I want to see, but the political ads get in the way? Why should I HAVE TO turn it off? Why don’t POLITICIANS “turn it off? It’s nobody’s right to put me in a position where I HAVE TO turn it off to avoid the repetitive lies I see every day? He’s got a lot of nerve to even SUGGEST it. (The Blaze)

They're Already Doing It

This item is about how Blogger has agreed to censor blogs in certain countries. But they’re already doing it here. Not Blogger, Town Hall. I’ve run afoul of their censorship on a number of occasions. They didn’t like it when I called VP Biden “Joe Biteme” and apparently ANY word meaning penis, in any context, is verboten. Ass was censored one time when I told about Jesus leading an ass with his wife on it. They don’t look at the context; certain words are just verboten in the computer and will not be allowed. They will not even answer me when I protest. (The Blaze)

Tired Of It (Again)

I was tired of the “dog and pony show” politicians put on in 2007 and I’m tired of it today, It’s a shame we have to spend so much time listening to our lying politicians lying to us every 2 years or less. The biggest “dog and pony dhow” is for president, but we have to suffer it again and again for local elections, too, in between. I think the system we have now of multiple primaries and caucuses, preceding a national election to choose a president is excessive. It was designed for a much smaller and simpler lifestyle. We don’t need to spend millions, maybe even BILLIONS of dollars and listen to thousands of ads of one politico or another attacking the other, with MAYBE true charges. I get sick and tired of listening to it. But I must do so if I’m to know what’s going on, otherwise. We need a system that doesn’t cost as much, and does not involve months and months of political ads, political speeches, and more and more bullsh-t, followed by more of it for the next election. Surely smart people could come up with a system that doesn’t involve this—but will they? Politicians LIKE the hooraw surrounding any election; they “feed” on it. I HATE it, and I’m a political commentator, so I get more of it than most people. The writer of the article here linked says he is almost relieved to turn to a sports channel. I am not. I live in Denver, where you cannot avoid discussion of the Broncos—or the Rockies, or the Nuggets, or Avalanche, or many, many others, day after day. People seem to be as obsessed with sports as others are with politics. I’m tired of OVERDOSING on anything: politics OR sports. Recently I got a lot of static for not wearing something orange to “support our Broncos.” I told them I was wearing orange skivvies and asked if they wanted to see. That usually shut them up. People obsess about many things, and it makes me sick; politics most of all. (The Penultimate word)

What Religion Is He?

One of the factors many people find important in any election is the religion to which a nominee adheres. For instance, some people would never vote for Romney because he is a Mormon. Way back when, many people expressed reservations about voting for Jack Kennedy because he was a Catholic. I can think of MANY good reasons why nobody should have EVER voted for Kennedy, or many others, but religion is NOT one of them. Some people will never vote for a Jew, because he IS a Jew. They ignore other negatives and possibly positives, simply because he is a Jew. I would never vote for a Muslim, but not because he is a Muslim. I would not vote for him because the Muslim religion itself is not a religion, but a political dogma group, PRETENDING to be a religion and their Sharia law is an abomination and should not be imposed upon ANYBODY. It’s not BECAUSE he is a Muslim, but because he would try and force not only his “religion,” but also other of his beliefs upon me, and everybody else. It's because of his way of thinking. Other than things like that in SOME religions, religion is not important in politics, though way too many people think it is. I don’t. (Just common sense)

Lucas is Confused

He says he’s for democracy, but not CAPITALIST democracy. If so, what has he been practicing all these years while earning millions of dollars? I don’t think he understands what capitalism IS. Capitalism is a derisive descriptive word invented by the liberals (socialists) to describe the FREE MARKET, which Lucas has been practicing for many years. I wish there was a way to get to people like Lucas with intelligence, not ignorance, which seems to be his base when it comes to economics. He says “the rich shouldn’t be able to buy the presidency, but that’s exactly what is happening right now—and that’s NOT capitalism, it’s corrupt government. Obama has conned Americans out of a BILLION dollars for his re-election campaign, even though he has spent more money than there IS in his attempt to “socialize” this country. That’s more than anybody else has and if that isn’t trying to BUY the presidency, I don’t know what is. (The Blaze)