"Gun Research Without Politics"

That’s what they promise with new “research” being conducted at Arizona State University, using a $5 million dollar grant from the National Institutes of Health, one of the most anti-gun fool outfits there are. Do you think their results won’t be used politically? If you do, I’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn that can be yours at a song. Gun research without politics. Now THAT’S funny! Since when have you seen ANY “gun research,” on either side, that didn’t end up with politics? No matter which side the research comes down on, one side supports it, and the other side opposes it. That’s the very DEFINITION of politics. As with philosophy, you just cannot divorce gun research from politics, and to promise to do so is a bit naive. And anti-gun politicians ARE naive. They think simply passing a law against something will stop people from using it. They think if they can just get rid of guns, crime will stop. One of their most popular idiot laws is the “gun-free zone.” And many businesses also declare their property as a “gun-free zone,” telling people to leave their guns at home when they come there. It is those “zones’ where most gun crime occurs because the bad guys know the law-abiding won’t usually be armed, and able to oppose them, there. (ABC 15)

CNN Showing Their Ignorance

They’re now SUING the White House, saying it has “violated the constitutional rights of Jim Acosta by taking away his press pass.” What stupidity this exposes, and it is nothing but a “grandstand play” for more publicity because they have NO CHANCE of winning anything. The power to issue a press pass presupposes the power to REFUSE to issue a pass. That is, in NO WAY a constitutional right for Acosta. His pass was removed FOR CAUSE. He continually monopolized the press conference, stopping other reporters from being able to ask their questions. He laid hands on a White House intern in refusing to give up the microphone. They did NOT refuse CNN access. They are free to send another reporter, who is better behaved. Or he/she will have the pass rejected, too. Acosta works HARD to make the story about himself. Maybe he hopes to get a raise from CNN. He certainly figures they won’t fire him for these antics, or he wouldn’t do them. Acosta is NOT a “journalist.” He is a troublemaker from beginning to end, and President Trump is fed up with him. President Trump has the RIGHT to limit access to his press conferences to those who do not disrupt them. CNN needs to get rid of Acosta. Lest THEY lose their PRIVILEGE of attending those press conferences. (American Action News)

Trump's Going to Win!

The Dumocrats are “up against a wall.” They’re LOSING again. President Trump is presiding over a BOOMING economy, with record low unemployment numbers after Obama told the nation that the jobs lost during his administration were gone forever. That they would never come back. But they came back. Lowered taxes have put more dollars in everybody’s pockets, and caused those large “wascally corporations” to give them raises AND bonuses. Something unheard of in recent memory. Meanwhile, Obama is scrambling to take credit for Trump’s economy, saying the booming economy is the “result of things I did.” Yeah, right. Why then were you preaching doom and gloom as “the new normal?” Obama KNEW that, if Hillary had been elected, she would have continued the policies that would guarantee the DESTRUCTION of the economy so she could move us to a socialist state. But Trump got elected, and has so successfully turned things around that Dumocrats can no longer hide the booming economy from voters. Dumocrats predicted a “Blue Wave” in the 2018 elections, but it ain’t agonna happen (it didn’t). (Just common sense)

Next, We Ban Cars

In Great Britain they never learned that banning the tools bad people use to kill other people never stops them. They had several major mass shootings. They don’t have a Second Amendment, so they banned guns. Then the bad guys started killing people with knives, so they banned knives. Then people started killing people with cars. Now the mayor of London wants to ban cars. Way to inconvenience everybody instead of attacking the real problem! They just don’t get it, no more than our own stupid politicians don’t get it. Banning the TOOLS bad guys use to victimize the law abiding NEVER stops them. They just use something else, or IGNORE your laws and use those tools, anyway. As usual, they paint their silly, USELESS laws as being “for freedom,” when they are NOT. They further limit the rights of the law abiding, while making it easier for those who IGNORE their laws to victimize the rest of us. Banning cars is the brainchild of London Mayor Sadiq Kahn, a Muslim. Which would be okay if he was thinking like a Brit, not a Muslim. He’s thinking like Muslims do in countries where they are in complete control. He is prima facie evidence of the reason why civilized people should NEVER elect a Muslim to a political office. Muslims tend to think and act like ants or bees, with a “hive mentality.” Whatever “the hive” dictates, they do. Which is why Muslims today, all over the world, are being treated like an “endangered species.” Which would not be a problem if they didn’t get taught in the Koran that it is okay to MURDER people who don’t convert to their “religion,” and that it is okay to murder their children if they do something to “dishonor” their family. Personally, I have nothing against Muslims, per se. I DO have something against Muslims who want to KILL us, or are always trying to change our ways and bring THEIR “values” to us, while FORCING us to accept it. If they leave me alone. I leave them alone. (Bearing Arms)

Racist College Course

How do you CREATE racism in young people? That’s easy. Just create a college course and give it a good-sounding name. Stanford has done just that. They created one called, “Racism and White Nationalism in the Trump Era.” What a mouthful. It pretends to teach about “white nationalism” as something that really exists. And to believe it IS racism. Black against white racism. We’ve come so far in our treatment of black people today that the liberals need to CREATE a new kind of racism, out of “whole cloth.” So they’ve hit on “white nationalism.” An imaginary thing it is impossible to prove actually exists, or that it DOESN’T exist. But liberals insist it does, and tell us that people who deny its existence are racists, themselves. That’s how liberals work. They create something that isn’t real, then call us names when we disagree. And one of their methods is to create a college course with a nice-sounding name, and teach their “flights of fancy” as if they were real. This is how they’re trying to turn the whole race thing around backward, making white people the ones subjugated by black people, thereby making the black race the “superior race.” Naturally, they include their Trump hatred in what they teach. Of course, they’ll call me a racist for writing this, but I expect it. They already have me on several “lists of racists” because I write the truth, even if it criticizes black people. They can’t handle that. I don’t care if people are black, white, yellow, red, or purple with green polka-dots. I judge people as INDIVIDUALS. (Legal Insurrection)

Casparov Talks Turkey

Russian Gary Casparov, one of the finest chess players in the world, who once took on 32 chess computers at the same time and beat them all, expounds on socialism, a system he has lived under for years: “I’m enjoying the irony of American Sanders supporters lecturing me, a former Soviet citizen, on the glories of Socialism and what it means! Socialism sounds great in speech soundbites and on Facebook, but please keep it there. In practice, it corrodes not only the economy but the human spirit itself, and the ambition and achievement that made modern capitalism possible and brought billions of people out of poverty. Talking about Socialism is a huge luxury, a luxury that was paid for by the successes of capitalism. Income inequality is a huge problem, absolutely. But the idea that the solution is more government, more regulation, more debt, and less risk is dangerously absurd.” So next time a “socialist dilettante” who thinks he knows all about it because he has read some propaganda about it, tells you all about how great socialism is, tell him to talk to somebody who LIVED under socialism and find out the truth that socialism is a DRAG on any economy and will eventually ruin it, if practiced. (Just common sense)

Britain: "Gun Control Utopia"

Guns are effectively prohibited, even for most cops, in London, so there should be no crime, no violence, right? WRONG! Recently, in South London, in what APPEARS to be, but may not be a “gang fight,” four young teens were stabbed, one of them disemboweled, with maybe only an 8% chance of living, according to one person. Even knives are “controlled” in London, so how did these CHILDREN get their knives? The same way other criminals get their guns, of course. They IGNORE anti-gun laws (and anti-knife laws) routinely there, just like they do here. Here, those laws are unconstitutional because they are an “abridgment” on our Second amendment rights, even though the Supreme Court hasn’t yet gotten around to declaring them so. Every anti-gun law in America is unconstitutional for that reason. And they are USELESS, in that they only apply to the law-abiding, while the lawbreakers routinely ignore them. Anti-gun fools pass these laws. They don’t work. And they pass even more of them, and all they do is disarm the law-abiding, making it easier for the lawbreakers to victimize them. (Metro)

Ginsberg At Death's Door

I’m 81 and, except for some difficulty walking, I’m fully capable of moving on my own. But I wouldn’t even try to be a Supreme Court Justice because it would mean my death a lot sooner than planned. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg is in even worse shape. She’s practically incapable of walking on her own, and took a long time to move from her wheelchair to get into a car, with the help of THREE men. She can barely hold her head up. Liberals made a big thing of her leaving the hospital so soon, but I think it was a mistake on her part. For her to continue as a Justice will mean her death before very long. She’s trying to stay on the Court long enough to thwart any attempt to allow Trump to appoint another conservative Justice, but I think she will fail, because every day she tries to fulfill her obligations as a Justice moves her closer to her death, from overwork. Almost any work she does is overwork for a woman as old as she is, and as frail as she is. I’m younger than she is, and I wouldn’t attempt what she is trying. She is committing suicide by inches in her attempt to keep liberals on the court. And I don’t think she’s going to make it. It’s too bad. She could live a lot longer if she’d just recognize reality and retire. She deserves as long a retirement as possible. (The Horn News)

I Want to Gag

Whenever I hear a liberal say she just “wanted a justice who believed in Roe v. Wade.” What she’s saying is that she wants a justice that believes in the MURDER of defenseless infants in the womb (and sometimes out of it, too). She wants a justice that will rule according to liberal ideas, rather than the law, or the Constitution, which is the base on which ALL our laws sit. They MUST conform to it, or be declared unconstitutional. Of course, that does not stop fool politicians from making them, and enforcing them UNTIL they are declared unconstitutional, after often years of being enforced, and sometimes ruining lives, before they can be brought before the Court. That’s the trouble with the Supreme Court today, as Justices rule on their biases and beliefs, and even on FOREIGN law, rather than on the Constitution and/or the statutes made to conform to it. Just thinking about that makes me want to puke! Justices that do that should be impeached, and “run out of town on a rail.” (Just common sense)

No Crime; Take Guns

In Arizona the governor is pushing for a law that allows them to confiscate (steal) guns from legal owners if a judge “deems them” to be “dangerous,” or if they are incarcerated “on suspicion” of a crime for 21 days or have been on a “mental health incarceration” to SEE if they are mentally deficient. Conviction of a crime or a mental condition not required. Even if no such condition is found. The incarceration is sufficient. This is like the RICO laws. Under RICO, which was PASSED to deprive “rich drug barons” of the right to a proper defense by taking away their money, is now being used to “confiscate” (steal) CARS because of the most minor of crimes, suspicions only. No actual CONVICTION required for their property to be stolen by the government. The RICO laws are unconstitutional, even though they have been enforced for years without being sent to the Supreme Court for a decision. They are unconstitutional because they are DESIGNED to deprive an American citizen of his/her right to a PROPER defense against an out of control government. This law would be unconstitutional also, for the same reasons, since NO CRIME is required to deprive an American citizen of his/her Second Amendment rights, and could be enforced for DECADES before being so designated by the Supreme Court. (Cogito Ergo Geek)

"Just Pay for It!"

That’s what I’d tell newly elected congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who can’t afford an apartment until she gets her first paycheck as a member of Congress. Boo-hoo! Why doesn’t she just “pay for it,” as she advises that we must do to pay for her “flights of fancy” as a liberal electee. I’ve seen some ignorant people elected to office, but this woman is about the most ignorant I’ve ever seen. She is a socialist, but she has no idea what socialism IS. She has no idea how to pay for all her give-away ideas, so she says, “just pay for it.” With what? Where’s the money coming from? Higher taxes, of course. She doesn’t understand that, either. She doesn’t understand ANYTHING. But she is now a Member of Congress. She has many ideas she wants to impose on us, only one of which will bankrupt this nation. That is “free tuition for all.” It sounds good to those who want to live at the expense of others, but it will be the death of America as we know it, if enacted. We will become “Soviet America,” with all its warts, including the death of millions, as happened in Russia under a different form of collectivism, called communism. Socialism and communism only differ cosmetically. Both are different forms of collectivism, a system based on the THEFT of the fruits of the production of new wealth, for the benefit of the “drones” of society, who only want to live at the expense of others. (Liberty Bugle)

Fake News Is Funny!

I can’t believe the anti-Trump fools are so stupid as to believe that a book, based on NOTHING, can bring a president down. Especially not a president that has had as much success as has this one. Bob Woodward’s book, “Fear,” has no real basis in fact, only based on UNNAMED sources, like much of the “fake news” out there today. They concoct a false narrative and publish it, basing their stories on ANONYMOUS sources, and we’re supposed to believe their crap. they’ve been using this scam for many years, because those gullible voters who pay no attention to politics until just before an election believe it. Well, more intelligent people who DO pay attention to politics have “come out of the woodwork” and have voted in a man who can whip them at their own game, because he has never operated in their bailiwick. He has operated in his own, and excelled at it. They can’t hurt him because he is smarter than they are, so they have no way of understanding what he is doing to them. They wish he’d use the old, “time-honored” political methods so they can stop him. But he uses his own methods, and they are incapable of improvising to match his moves. They pride themselves on being two or three steps ahead of their opponents, but Trump is 16 to 20 moves ahead of THEM. He whips them at every turn, and they spend most of their days in a daze, wondering what happened, and they will never know. (Great American Daily)

Armed Civilian Saves Cop

I recently wrote an item about a convicted felon shooting someone to death, then later wounding three cops when they went to apprehend him. In it, I noted (again) that if ONE civilian had been there with his own gun and the proper training in using it, maybe that victim would not have to die. In this case, that’s exactly what happened. A simple traffic stop turned deadly as one man began beating the cop who stopped him and tried to get his gun. A passerby saw this and used his legally owned gun to shoot the attacker, saving that cop’s life. He will not be charged with a crime for shooting that would-be killer to save that cop’s life. Surprise, surprise! Had this armed civilian not been there, that cop may be dead, today. Since he was, and was willing to act, that cop will go home after his shift, and be welcomed by his wife. These things happen daily, but you rarely hear about them in the national news. That’s because the liberal news media, which seems to be in control of the news, refuses to cover such stories, because they don’t advance their anti-gun narrative. (ABC News)

"Vowing Gun Control"

Dumocrats, after hearing about the mass shooting in California, wasted no time in “vowing gun control, using their newfound majority in Congress.” Riiigghhtt! They’ll send out many fund-raising letters, demanding money to do what they know they cannot do, take guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have them. All their favorite laws are already in effect in California, the state in which this new atrocity occurred. So what do they want to do? Enact even more of their USELESS, unenforceable laws that do NOTHING toward “keeping guns out of the hands of those who shouldn’t have them.” Their big problem is that none of their laws apply to those who shouldn’t have guns because they just IGNORE them and get them ILLEGALLY. Word is, the shooter in California got his gun legally, in spite of the fact that he had been subject to a mental health examination after a confrontation some time ago where he was wrecking his own house. They decided then that he was not a danger to himself, or others. Boy, did THEY screw up! So all their laws did NOTHING to keep him from getting the gun he used to kill 12 people, including one cop, who tried to stop him. There were reportedly SIX cops in that crowd, all UNARMED, so they could do nothing but cower, out of his sight, while he killed people, left and right. They give politicians a hard time for “doing nothing about gun control” when there’s actually nothing they CAN do, using the laws they have made so far—and nobody has come up with anything better. (New York Times)

Paid "Protesters"

One wonders how so many “protesters” can afford to be off work so much of the time so they can “protest” everything Trump does. Well, the answer to that is that most of them are PROFESSIONAL demonstrators. They get PAID to demonstrate, and get free transportation to the site of their “demonstrations.” And they have become so brazen about it that they no longer even hide the fact that they ARE being paid, as a recent article in the DC Clothesline attests. I remember an employee of one sign company I used to work for who was a “demonstrator” and went to many demonstrations. I specifically remember one where he got fined $1,000.00, which was paid by the organizers of that demonstration. I don’t know if he got paid otherwise, but he lost many days at the sign shop while he was demonstrating—and they didn’t pay people who weren’t working for them. If you look closer, you will find that most, if not ALL of the “demonstrations” to which these people go are LEFT-wing demonstrations. Here are few “conservative” demonstrations because conservatives tend to be gainfully employed otherwise, while left-wingers are not, as a rule. (DC Clothesline)

Incompetent Policing

Convicted felons can’t legally buy guns. Right? Then why did Marlin Mack, a convicted felon, PASS a background check so he could legally buy the gun he used to kill a “graduate student” during an attempted restaurant robbery? Cops found him at a “swanky hotel” later, and three cops were shot apprehending him. All with a gun he bought LEGALLY while being a convicted felon. Mack was killed in that gunfight, which is the best way to handle such people. One cop said, “He needs to be warehoused until he is old and decrepit. WRONG! Had he lived, he should have been given the death penalty. Some people just don’t deserve to be alive. Mack is one of them. Anti-gun fools say “background checks save lives.” Did they save these lives? Obviously not, as the dead bodies piled up attest. When even a convicted felon can pass one of their highly vaunted background checks and buy his guns LEGALLY, we’re ALL in trouble. And the ONLY real solution is to ARM the law-abiding so they can protect themselves, instead of DYING while waiting for the cops to arrive with their guns. Had there been ONE armed civilian in that crowd at the restaurant, maybe that “graduate student” would not have had to die. But anti-gun fools will NOT hear of this. They go right on making their USELESS laws that stop NOBODY from getting guns. If they can’t get them legally, they get them ILLEGALLY. (Truth About Guns)

We're Screwing Ourselves

The gullible American people elected many Dumocrats on November 6. But the biggest mistake (that we know of) was giving socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez a seat in the House. We will suffer from that later on, as she introduces socialist measures and other socialist-leaning Dumocrats vote with her. Most notably Bernie Sanders, who was re-elected, along with her. Frankly, I can’t see why anybody with any degree of intelligence, at all, would ever vote for a Dumocrat. They have told us, loud and clear, that they want to reverse all the good things Trump has given us, and get rid of Trump, too. Nancy Peelosi called Trump’s massive tax cuts (for everybody, not just the rich) “crumbs,” which belittles the largest tax cut in history. Then she told us Dumocrats would reject that tax cut if they could, along with everything good Trump has done in just two years. Yes, we retained a “sliver thin” control in the Senate, which should allow us to block what the Dumocrats want to do to this country—IF the RINOs and Trump haters in the Republican Party don’t sabotage that. The good news is that the Dumocrat majority in the House is just as “razor thin,” which means things could change. Of course, they could also change in the other direction too, because the difference in the Senate is also thin. (The Blaze)

Coward's "Resistance"

Some guy (it might be a guy) SUPPOSEDLY “in the White House” doing everything he/she can to derail Trump’s work, has written an ANONYMOUS letter to the editor of The New York Times (surprise, surprise!) saying he/she is part of “the resistance” working in the White House. But since he/she didn’t have guts enough to attach his/her name to the letter, there’s no proof of that. The letter could just be from some liberal fool out there CLAIMING to be “in the White ‘House.” It might even be a White House janitor! The very fact that the letter is anonymous makes it worthless. Nobody cares what some fool liberal out there thinks. But liberals everywhere will treat it as “gospel truth” and claim it as “authoritative truth,” when it is anything BUT. It’s like the “imaginary Friend” Harry Reid cited once for one of his “flights of fancy” or the other “anonymous sources” cited by liberal-run newspapers for their critical articles about President Trump. It’s a pattern: start something by using an “unnamed source,” declare it truth, and expound upon it forever. They’ve used this scam over and over. “The Resistance” is just another name for “The Swamp,” and they’re doing everything they can to stop Trump before he gets to them. (Patriot Post)

"Watch Out for the Kids!"

When you’re choking and threatening to kill your girlfriend and everyone else in the house, watch out for the kids. Don’t discount their presence, and ability to change things, as these children did. This man, who was a felon and had MANY GUNS, often carrying one, was strangling his girlfriend and threatening to kill her and all her children, when the fifteen-year-old daughter was handed a gun by her younger brother, and used it to kill the guy before he could finish carrying out his threat. There are several things here that prove, again, that anti-gun laws don’t work. First, this guy was a felon and had SEVERAL guns, often even carrying one, in violation of MANY of the anti-gun laws. Second, it was a good thing there were that many guns in the house, because that is what led to his death, rather than hers, and that of all her children. Yes, a child using a gun would ordinarily be against the law too, but in this case, it was simple self defense, and no charges will be filed against this young girl. (WBTV)

"Coffman's Done Nothing!"

That’s what his opponent’s ads say. (paid for by "Everytown Against Guns) “He opposes increased background checks and banning certain kinds of weapons, so we need to vote him out.” I wish they would tell me, what would THEY do? None of the laws already in force have done a single thing to limit or stop gun violence, and that includes the laws they are talking about. Increased background checks only affect those who get their guns LEGALLY, which people contemplating major “gun crime” never do. Banning guns likewise. Those bans only affect people who buy their guns LEGALLY. “Gun-free zones” only affect those who OBEY laws, which criminals do NOT. I wish politicians like this would tell us what THEY would do that people like Mike Coffman are NOT doing. Coffman wisely refuses to make more USELESS laws that do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun violence.” That is NOT a “negative” in the minds of people with INTELLIGENCE. But then, people with intelligence don’t insist on making more laws that accomplish NOTHING. (Just common sense)