Payback Time

Democrats are trying to convince voters that "Rev." Hagee is McCain's pastor (which he is not) so they can use him as "payback" for the "Rev." Wright controversy. They're trying to paint a picture of a similarity between a radical preacher who merely ENDORSED McCain to a radical pastor who has been preaching hate to Obama AND his wife for TWENTY YEARS. Wright WAS Obama's pastor for that long. He married them; he baptized their children. Don't try and make me believe that NOT ONCE in 20 years did Obama hear Wright's "hate preaching." Conversely, McCain doesn't even KNOW Hagee, has never attended his church, and he is CERTAINLY not his pastor. That is a lie by Democrats, trying again to fool the voters. McCain has also rejected an endorsement from another preacher who feels (rightly) that Islam, as it is presented to the world, is an "inherently violent religion" (It is). Violence against "unbelievers" is taught in the Koran. They can't escape that. (CNN)

Terrorism Victim Deaths Decline 40%!

That's a BUNCH! In spite of what the liberals (Democrats) want us to think, we ARE "making progress" in the "war on terror." But do you hear about this in the liberal media? Nope! Not a peep! They don't report things that go against their agenda. Just more evidence that the liberal media "slants" the news in many ways. One of those ways is to simply IGNORE news that "puts the lie" to their preconceived notions. (CNews)

Media Ignores Success in Sadr City

Just more evidence of liberal media's misconduct and malpractice. We've made a lot of progress in Sadr City, one of the hottest "hot spots" in Iraq. But have you heard about it on CNN? NBC? CBS? ABC? Doubtful. They simply IGNORE news they don't like, and they don't like this. Their "big thing" is Bush's "lack of leadership (whether or not it exists)." Concerning his "leadership" of conservatives, they're right. A conservative, he's not. But simple leadership? Certainly. He's the only politician I've seen lately who sees the problem, and is not afraid to DO what's necessary to solve it, in spite of opposition from liberals. (Houston Chronicle)

"Quit Looking At Her Butt!"

Now there's yet another thing the Democrats won't let us do: look at Hillary's butt. Frankly, I'd like to know what ANYBODY would be interested in concerning Hillary's butt. I've never seen Hillary as a "sex object," and I'm certain neither has Bill. I think they need to stop telling us what to do in all things if they want to get ANY of our votes (although she certainly won't get mine, in any case). They're just showing us what it will be like if ANY liberal Democrat gets elected. Every day there will be an announcement of yet another thing they want to prohibit us from doing or saying, with Obama's "elephant ears" and Hillary's butt right near the top of the list. (Just common sense)

Tennessee Refuses to "Recognize" Home Schoolers

They flatly refuse to issue diplomas to children who have been home schooled. I guess that's one way to kill home schooling and make sure those students are FORCED to go to public schools and be conditioned to believe that socialism is the way to go, and do it "bureaucratically," since they can't "git 'er" done legislatively. They don't want home schooled applicants for state jobs, even though they are proven to be more intelligent and better educated than public school students. Tennessee is below average in ACT scores nationally, but it is the PUBLIC school student scores bringing their average down. Tennesee public schools scored an average of 20.7, while home schoolers scored an average of 22.8, which is ABOVE the national average of 21.0. It's interesting to note that in 2005, the ACT organization stopped delineating the difference between home schooled student scores and those of the conditioned public school student scores. Could it be they didn't want to give help to those who wanted to home school their kids by keeping them away from the socialist indoctrination in public schools?

Maxine Waters "Steps in It"

She told the truth about Democrat plans in public. She flat told the oil executives that they intend to "socialize (nationalize)" the oil companies so the government can continue screwing up the oil business. She blames the oil companies for the Congress-created oil supply crisis, and no amount of "common sense" will change her mind. As with all liberals, it's already made up. It seems funny to me that "nationalizing" the oil industry in order to "solve" the problem when it was the policies of Congress (allowing the environmental crazies to block ALL petroleum refinery building in the nation for more than 30 years while disallowing the hunt for oil in this country altogether, FORCING us to rely on foreign oil and prices to go up astronomically) that created the problem in the first place. Why do people who aspire to the highest office in the land NOT understand this while a guy like me can? I'm not a "hifalutin' politician," but if I can see this, why can't they? (Rush Limbaugh)

What IS Socialism?

Imagine my surprise when my own sister read the first few chapters of my new book, "What's WRONG In America" in manuscript form and asked me "What is socialism?" She said she became confused at all the "isms" I mentioned. I explained to her that socialism is just one form of collectivism, which is basically TAKING from those who EARN their way and GIVING that taken to those who DON'T. Their "mantra" is "From each according to his ability and to each according to his need, making "need" a DEMAND on the EARNINGS of those who can earn their own way. The major fight is between collectivism and individualism. Individualism is where a person earns his/her own way, and doesn't "need" anything from others. Looters can't stand this. They want others to "need" things so they can use that "need" to gain power over both the "producer" AND the "moocher.". I call these people the "moochers" (leeches) of society The "enablers" are the "looters" who to get themselves elected to positions of power over the rest of us, promise to TAKE from those who can, and will EARN, and "keep the goodies coming" so the "moochers" can live without having to work at anything except convincing the "looters" they are the most needy. Needless to say, she is much more educated in "the ways of the world" now. But that experience was, to me, an "epiphany." I had thought that EVERYONE knew what socialism was, and why it is EVIL. They do not. That is why I wrote that book, which, if you read it all, does a good job of explaining just what socialism is. The book will be out very soon. It is being printed right now. I'll let you know where you can get it then. (Just common sense)

U. N. to "Investigate" Racism in U. S. Election

What unmitigated gall! What a colossal, glittering jewel of ignorance! What big gonads they must have to claim racism in the U. S. presidential election because a few politicians can't get it through their fat heads that being half black is NOT the reason why people in the United states do not want a SOCIALIST as president and cry "racism." Why don't they "investigate" racism in other UN countries where it really exists? Where the governments themselves are committing genocide against black people, sometimes under the auspices of the United Nations itself? How do you think racism exists in a country where a (half) black man is seriously considered for president? They can't force a socialist (who happens to be half black) on us, or a WOMAN who is also a socialist on us, so it's got to be racism or sexism, right? What stupidity! I'd vote for Condoleeza Rice in a "New York minute." So would most Americans, and she's both black AND a woman. But the Democrats and those liberals in the Republican Party won't hear of it because she's a CONSERVATIVE. This is racism? Sheesh! I think this is just a case of another "racism hunter" LOOKING for racism, and will probably find it because he makes up the rules himself. For the first time in history a black man has a chance to be elected president and THAT'S reason to "investigate" us for racism? What kind of twisted thinking is THAT? (Free Republic)

Liberals "Tickle Me"

They say the stupidest things! Obama is "blaming Fox for one of his many losses. So what? Does he think Fox should be in HIS corner? I don't think so! He calls Rush Limbaugh and Lou Dobbs "xenophobe" because they tell the truth about illegal aliens. And they think people who pay attention to politics believe them. I got news for them. It's only those who DON'T "pay attention to politics" until just before an election who will. And I don't think that's enough this time. It's really funny. The Damnocrats whine about "hurting someone's feelings and try always (mostly) to avoid it (unless that somebody is a conservative). They cry about "the politics of personal destruction," yet they are the best and most able practitioners of it. (Jonathan Martin)

That's The Way They Operate

And they get away with it all the time because mostly the courts in which they operate are their own "captive courts" where "evidence" can be nothing more than a worker's opinion. Where they screwed up this time is trying to do it in front of the world and NATIONAL media. They couldn't keep operating as judge, jury, and executioner themselves, and the judge who "caught the case" realized that. There may have been many underage "mothers" or mothers who were underage when they were forced into marriage with much older men. But unfortunately, the proof just wasn't easily obtainable and the "child protectors" just aren't used to operating under such restrictions). So these underage mothers or FORMER underage mothers will be reunited with their husbands and many co-wives, and things will "go back to (their kind of) normal." This isn't about multiple wives, which IS illegal everywhere in this country. It's about forcing CHILDREN to be screwed by old men and become the mothers of their many children. They need to keep on investigating this situation without involving the "child protectors," who routinely exceed their authority and, unless it's in THEIR courts, can screw it up royally. (Café Hayek)

Romanoff's Dream

This Cartoon does a good job of illustrating what the Colorado Legislature, led by Rep. Andrew Romanoff want to do with the money "in the pot" forced there by the TABOR Amendment. They want to "tap it" and have a LOT more of our money to spend. This is what ALL legislatures want to do, including the federal one, and most of their actions are toward that end.(John Caldera/Politix Cartoons)

Losing Respect for Judgment

It amazes me how ignorant otherwise intelligent people can be. It seems like way too many top politicians who ARE otherwise intelligent are "buying" liberal fantasies. McCain, for instance, has "bought" AlGore's global warming swindle, as has George Bush and the top executives in many large corporations (or are they just "giving lip service" to it to keep the liberal environmental jerks off their backs?). In any case, they're making changes in response to those same environmental crazies' policies and imaginary "problem-solving." I was "blown away" when Newt Gingrich was seen sitting on the same couch with the queen of the liberal idiots, Nancy Pelosi, pushing a "green lifestyle." I immediately canceled my subscription to his online newsletter because I completely lost confidence in his judgment. They say "McCain's Global-Warming Plan Upsets Conservatives." Wrong. It upsets ANYBODY who is smart enough to know AlGore's swindle is a scam of unprecedented size. Pelosi, I'm not surprised about. She's known to be ignorant. That's why she's the top Damnocrat in the House. It's the others that concern me. Like George Bush actually saying something stupid like, "We're addicted to oil." Anybody with ANY intelligence knows you can't be "addicted" to something you need to survive, such as food and drink. But I'm sure Bush believes what he said, which is what bothers me. How is it that top politicians, who hold, or wish to hold, the top office in the land, are not even as intelligent as I am. It disturbs me that such people can seriously be considered for president of this nation. (Human Events)

Predictable Response From Liberals

Philadelphia has the highest rate of murder per 100,000 citizens in the country. The latest murder to cause them ire is the murder of a policeman in a bank robbery, committed by three known-to-be-violent criminals who don't obey anti-gun laws. So what's their answer? More anti-gun laws! This is the answer to violent crime EVERYWHERE by liberals, no matter how many times it is proven to be a response that kills more people (They don't work, so let's make more of them). What is WRONG with them? Are they stupid? Most likely. Maybe they're simply insane. Insanity is defined as "doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result." I would say the liberal response to violent crime, specifically "gun crime," fits this description. (John Lott)

Banning "Jihan Watch"

Many offices have actually banned the "Human Events" column, "Jihad Watch," saying it is "hate speech" because it tells the truth about Islam. One of the recent columns is "Who's Speaking At the Local Mosque?" This article tells the tals about Islamic speakers "preaching hate" in Mosques, right in your own town, sometimes in your own neighborhood, and even THINKING about having the cops "check them out" to see what they're preaching is considered "racism." Is this stupid, or what? When Nazis were "preaching hate," they didn't have churches right here in your own city in which to preach it, and no one ever criticized people for objecting to Nazis "preaching hate." But now they're calling "telling the truth about Islam" hate speech. What a way to kill more Americans! The people who do this get "all bent out of shape" if you just SUGGEST they're "anti-American," but I ask you: "What would they do differently if they WERE?" Gawd, what stupid people we've become! (Human Events/Jihad Watch)

Empty Holsters "Frighten" Students

What a bunch of weenies they are! To be "frightened" by an inanimate object. Schools are well known to be a "gun-free zone," telling criminals, "Come on in and shoot us. We don't have guns with which to protect ourselves here." "During the week of April 21-25, 2008, thousands of college students throughout the United States, organized under the banner of Students for Concealed Carry on Campus (SCCC), will attend classes wearing empty holsters, in protest of state laws and school policies that stack the odds in favor of dangerous criminals and armed killers by disarming law abiding citizens licensed to carry concealed handguns virtually everywhere else." Notice, one of the things they're demonstrating against is not even allowing those who are LICENSED to carry concealed everywhere else on campus with their guns. That this policy does not even slow down those bent on killing people on campus was proven at several schools, one of the recent ones Virginia Tech, where more than 20 people were killed because none of the students OR faculty--or even security could carry a gun to use in their defense. School "authorities" say they're opposed to this demonstration because it "frightens" students. I'd say they'd be even more "frightened" if someone bent on killing them brings a REAL gun into their classroom. Do they really think a student or a faculty member would "go crazy" if guns were allowed in classrooms? Do they think a ban on guns in schools will actually keep "crazies" out? Come on! (SCCC)

Ignorant Professor Sues Students

What for? For criticizing her in "student evaluations." Apparently, she wants to frighten future students into giving her a phony good evaluation so she can keep her job, even if she is incompetent. Seems like she just doesn't believe in "academic freedom." She'll probably want to sue ME for this item. But I say to her, "if you want to waste your money and time, go for it! I'll be happy to slap her down." She apparently doesn't know you can't sue people for expressing their own personal; opinion in this country. Actually, you CAN sue them, but you won't win. (Paul Jacobs/Common Sense)

Beer-Drinking Hillary

Hillary will do ANYTHING to "outdo" Obama, who was recently seen "bowling" like a REAL American. So she just had to "pander" to the "average American," who is thought to swill beer and other forms of "alky" while standing in place and nodding their heads, calling that "dancing. No one knows if Obama actually bowled for a score, or even what that score was, (I suspect it was one throw of the ball, for the cameras) but neither display makes me think either Damnocrat candidate is a "regular American," so they can quit it and go back to being the "elitist liberals" they really are. (Pajama Pack)

Congress CREATES the Problems

Every time we have a major problem, somebody wants CONGRESS to "solve it." But most of our problems are CREATED by Congress. So how could anybody seriously suggest we ask CONGRESS to "solve" anything? The answer is simple: "problems" are routinely "created" by congressional policies in order to give them something to talk about before the next election. They think, since they created the problem in the first place, it will be easy to "solve" it. It's a scam, and if you believe it, you are "falling for" the scam. The scam is "The Hegelian Principle," which is, CREATE a "problem or build an existing one up out of proportion; PUBLICIZE the "problem. Build it up until people start demanding it be "solved"; offer a SOLUTION to the "problem," usually one that involves higher taxes and the loss of more rights. This is a scam that has been used for CENTURIES, but still works for politicians. Will YOU keep "falling for it?" (The Atlasphere/Economist Walter E. Williams)

A "Perpetual Gaffe Machine"

They think George Bush mispronounces a word or two? How about Dan Quayle's misspelling of "potato?" They never let them forget it. But let Barack Obama talk about having been in "57 of 60 states," and they're "blissfully ignorant." When you come right down to it, Obama's gaffes aren't about misspelling or mispronouncing something, they're about his total ignorance of what's going on. "57 of 60 states?" Sheesh! And this guy wants to be president? He claimed that 10,000 people were killed in Kansas tornadoes when the actual death toll was 12; he says his parents got together during the Selma march and created him. Unfortunately, Selma didn't happen until FOUR YEARS after his birth. He's telling lies as if he were Hillary or Bill Clinton. Have you heard about any of these gaffes, or the ones in Michelle Malkin's article? I doubt it. The liberal media doesn't make a "big thing" out of Democrat gaffes. Only Republican gaffes. "Barack Obama--promoted by the Left and the media as an all-knowing, articulate, transcendent Messiah--is a walking, talking gaffe machine. How many more passes does he get? How many more can we afford? (Michelle Malkin)

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2008/05/21/barack_obama_gaffe_machine

You Won't Let Us Drill!

A senator was giving the CEO of Shell "what for," and he (The CEO) "scored a direct hit" on Senator Leahy. Patrick Leahy demanded to know why prices are so high in a "properly functioning free market." And the CEO came back with "There IS no free market! You won't let us drill!" (62% of oil drilling in the U. S. is prohibited)This is the first time an oil company CEO has "told the truth" in such a hearing. They're usually so cowed, they agree to whatever the Senator blowhards say. This guy "got his guts on" and told Leahy the truth to his face, and in front of the media. Ignoring such things, they now want to add an "excess profits tax," which would just be passed on to the consumer and not solve a thing. These politicians will never admit to their complicity in high gas prices. Instead, they'll completely ignore any reference to it. But the public is slowly figuring it out (Heard on the Rush Limbaugh show). But you probably won't hear much about it in the liberal media. (Just common sense)