Do the Democrats WANT To Destroy Us?

It looks that way. Everything they do or want to do is something that will hurt us. They want to destroy, or tax into bankruptcy "big business" of any kind. We're constantly hearing about "big oil" and the "need" to "take" their "record profits" (profits which, I might add, are theirs because the liberals {Democrats} will not allow them to drill for new oil and so that money stays in their "coffers."). They think "profit" is a "dirty word," when it is profits that keep this world running. they want to punish those who are CONTRIBUTING to the economy while rewarding those who do NOT. Even communist (socialist) countries like China have to make a profit in their dealings with other countries or they will "wither and die." They won't admit it to their citizens while they sell the fruits of their labors and keep the money, but it's true. Even Hugo Chavez, who hates the very thought of "profits" still must make a profit when he sells his stolen oil to other countries. They still think the way to self-defense is to DISARM us. Both personally, AND as a country. We constantly hear about "talking to" the terrorists, who simply want to KILL us. What do we "talk to them" about? How many innocent citizens we'll ALLOW them to kill before we stop them? Jimmy Carter is a fool. He has always BEEN a fool, and he is cementing that image by trying (again) to "talk to" the Islamic terrorists. Liberals whine about "the politics of personal destruction," but look what Bill Clinton tried to do to The American Spectator after the Spectator published a number of articles telling the truth about his and his wife's dealings. If you say ANYTHING that hurts them, they "come after you with all guns blazing." (Isn't that "the politics of personal destruction?") They're constantly "beating the drums" of recession, hoping we'll go into one before the election. That we haven't,by now, is bad for their chances. One of these days I'm going to do a book listing all the things liberals (Democrats) have done to hurt us, because it would TAKE a book. A BIG one, to list them all. (Just common sense)

"Out of Context?" Bullpoop!

The liberal press is insisting we (the "right-wingers") have "taken Rev. Wright out of context.") That his racist remarks were made a long time ago and he didn't believe that crap any more. I say that's a load of bull! Once a racist, always a racist, and Wright is a racist who hates whites and has hated them for a long time, while teaching his parishioners to hate them, too. They say his opinions shouldn't "tar" Obama. I say if Obama sat in his congregation Sunday after Sunday and listened to this crap, he believes the same way--or he'd have gotten up and left. He didn't. And Wright just repeated the same claptrap in his recent speech at the National Press Club in a "Q&A" session. He made a couple of "conciliatory" speeches, but when questioned, he reverted quickly to his racist crap. He says he "never discussed politics with Obama." What a load! This kind of man could NEVER resist "discussing politics" with a politician. He says Obama "says what he has to say as a politician" and "I say what I have to say as a man of God." Does that mean what both say is a lie? It's hard to "take him out of context" when he repeats his racist rants every time he gets up to speak. Obama is now saying he "denounces" Rev. Wright's remarks, but he is still not "denouncing" Rev. Wright. I don't believe him. I think he's just frightened that Wright could derail his dream to be president and will "throw him under the bus" if that's what it takes. (News Max)

Dems Emphasize American Deaths in Iraq

They don't care if the Islamic terrorists are "freed up" to come here and kill Americans. They just want to "end the war in Iraq." How long have we been in Germany and Europe? How about other places in the world where were once at war? We aren't "at war" in Iraq now, we're just "cleaning up" after a very short war in which we won in a few weeks. How LOW can they GO? I don't think there is a place too low for the Democrats to go to con us into voting them into office. No lie is too big, no scam is too elaborate for them to use to con us into keeping them in office so they can gain more and more control over what all of us do, every day. That is their goal; power. There's nothing they won't do to gain or keep it. They insult our intelligence every day. They think we're stupid. But actually, most of us are just ignorant. Ignorant because so many of us "pay no attention to politics" until a few months before an election when the lies are flying from both sides. They don't keep track of what their candidates are DOING every day to limit their rights and get their PERMISSION to do it! I'm tired of it. (News Max)

Not Racism; Culture

There's a good reason why certain people (sometimes referred to as "races") excel while others do not. It isn't "race," it's the CULTURE in which they live that decides their intelligence level, not their RACE. "Read the biographies of the important scholars and scientists in European history and it's interesting to note how many of them changed countries frequently, either seeking patronage or escaping persecution. The political unity of China and the diversity of Europe may be a function of their respective geographies. These factors in combination lead to different civilizations achieving different levels of technology, science--and law. These, in turn, lead to different standards of living and quality of life. When technology made mass immigration around the world possible, huge numbers of people began to express their opinion of what the good life was by voting with their feet. In doing so, they destroyed the racialist explanation forever, though of course, some continue to cling to it because their pitiful excuse for self-esteem is bound up in it." So never mistake CULTURAL differences for racial differences. It is not true. When you criticize the INTELLIGENCE of a Muslim from the Middle East, you're not being racist. You're merely commenting on their CULTURE, which is mired in the fifteenth century and trying, without much success because of their ignorant methods, to come into the twenty-first century. (Scholar Stephen Browne/The Atlasphere)

Free Speech Is NOT Total

Freedom of speech doesn't mean you can come into my living room and "peddle your opinion," if I don't want you to do so. The right to exclude people from making speeches in places you own is part and parcel of the right to property. Liberals seem to think "free speech" means they can say what they want, anywhere, without consequences. That's not the way it works. Free speech means simply they can say what they want in PUBLIC, or anywhere else where it is ALLOWED by the property owner, without being put in jail or executed BY THE GOVERNMENT. That's ALL it means. Liberals are well known for banning people from speaking in THEIR venues if they don't agree with what they say. Maybe they should learn that the same rules apply to EVERYBODY. (Tibor Machan, in The Atlasphere, 11/24/06) [Tibor Machan is the R. C. Hoiles Professor of Business Ethics & Free Enterprise at Chapman University's Argyros School of B&E and is a research fellow at the Pacific Research Institute (San Francisco, CA) and the Hoover Institution (Stanford University, CA).]

The "Religious Wall"

The Constitution says very clearly, that "Congress can make NO LAW regarding religion or the practice thereof." So liberals, who HATE religions other than their own (which is liberalism), are constantly MAKING LAWS regarding the PREVENTION of the practice of religion and twisting that into "recognizing the 'wall' between religion and government." They want to ELIMINATE RELIGION from sight, everywhere, and they're doing it successfully. They'll say I'm a "religious zealot" for writing this, which is typical of how liberals respond to ANY criticism: don't answer the criticism; just "label" the critic. But aside from believing in a superior being that has ORGANIZED this universe, I can't say I'm very religious. Many people CLAIM to know EXACTLY what that Supreme Being (God) has in mind, but ALL of that is merely what MAN wants to foist upon us in the NAME of God, some of it good, some of it bad, and I just don't buy it. (Just common sense)

Liberal Myth Revealed

The liberals would have you believe that under a liberal regime there is no poverty, no racism, that life should be "nirvana," with everybody "fat and happy." But New Orleans, having been under unfettered liberal "rule" for many years, is one of the poorest cities in the nation and has a miserable racism problem. It has a black majority that can't make it on their own and the local government isn't helping them at all. Just as in Boulder, Colorado, there should NOT be racism (according to liberals) but there is, New Orleans should be completely without problems after being under the liberals for years. But they have more problems, more racism, more poverty and people living in slums than most cities, and the liberals are bummed that this has been revealed for all to see.

Starbucks Hates Capitlism

Starbucks Coffee Stores, which have benefited mightily from "lassez-faire capitalism," apparently does not like it. A man went into one of those ubiquitous coffee shops and they told him they would "personalize" his "Starbucks Card," a "debit card-style" card you can use to pay in advance for your coffee and even give to friends as a gift. But as soon as they found out what he wanted on his card, they refused. It was "laissez-faire." They've allowed many liberal mottoes on their cards, but will not permit this one. If I ever drank their coffee, I would certainly stop now. Frankly, I don't drink coffee that tastes like battery acid. (Paul Jacob/Common Sense)

Do "The Rich" Not Pay Their Fair Share?

Have you ever been told by a liberal that "the rich" don't pay "their fair share" of taxes?" They keep telling this lie, over and over, hoping repetition will make it true. But it's NOT true. The top one percent of ("the rich," according to liberals) paid 39.4% of the total taxes paid, according to THE IRS! The bottom 50% of wage-earners paid a MAXIMUM of 7.5% since 1981, and only 3.5% in 2005! The top 50% of wage-earners paid 96.9% of all taxes paid. This does not even include those who are "net tax-receivers" who earn no money and live at the government's expense (and thus vote Democrat to keep the "goodies" coming). So now you can tell them they're liars and make it stick. Mike Rosen has "done the numbers" and has made a chart. (Mike Rosen)

Jimmy Carter: Laughing Stock

It is this kind of action, treating one of the world's best-known terrorists and murderers as if he should have the same respect as one of our "unknown soldiers" that has made former president Jimmy Carter (one of the worst in recent history) a laughingstock all over the world. In addition to being one of this country's most incompetent presidents, he is now an incompetent EX-president; and every time he gets conned into doing something like this, he proves it yet again. I think Carter is in the early stages of Alzheimer's Disease and should be controlled by someone more competent. (News Max)

Dan Blather Laments "New Order" in News

They proved again that no matter how badly you're disgraced, the liberal media will still "revere" you, give you awards, and continue to honor you even after you've had to leave your job in disgrace--if you're a liberal. If you're not, they'll be "dancing in the streets") At the dinner where they were "honoring" this dishonored man, he decried the "new order" in the news business where "corporate interests" were able to put stronger pressure on newspeople. But was it that? No, it was the "blogosphere" that discovered, and PROVED his lies, giving us "chapter and verse" as to how those "disputed" documents could not possibly be real, since the very technology found in the documents did not exist then. No, it's not a "new order of corporate pressure" that was your undoing. It was a new insistence on the TRUTH and the fact that you and your cohorts no longer control the dissemination of the news (Just common sense)

Phony "Racism" Charges

"Too "Extreme"

North Carolina GOP is planning to run an ad featuring Obama's "mentor" and pastor (of 20 years) Rev. Wright screaming "God DAMN America! What is "racist" about that? What is "extreme" about it except for Rev. Wright's tirade? This is exactly what Republicans are afraid of, a phony "racism" charge whenever they criticize Obama, in any way, because he is part black. They KNOW the Democrats, and they know they can EXPECT such charges, no matter what they say, or what they criticize about Obama. I have been called "racist" because I haven't been afraid to criticize "race-baiters" Al sharpton, Jesse Jackson and (Calypso Louie) Louis Farrakan. McCain is so afraid of it he denounced the ad without ever seeing it! The same thing applies to anybody who criticizes Hillary, too. Except they'll be whining about "attacking the girl." I've been suffering this "election" crap for a long time now, and I'm getting tired of it. I don't like either of them; not because one is half black or the other is all woman, but because they're BOTH socialists and incompetent "war-haters" who will (if they keep their word) SURRENDER to the Islamic terrorists as soon as they can, leaving the terrorists free to kill people right here in this country, which they've not been able to do with Bush keeping them busy elsewhere. (Charlotte Observer)

ABC News Lies...Again

About guns! What did you think they lied about? Everything? Probably. They lie about so many things in their efforts to support the liberal/socialist programs, it's hard to pick out what specific lies to tell about. I used to watch ABC News regularly, until I learned why what I thought I knew was so different from the truth. They had been lying to me, right along. So have NBC and CBS, and just about every other "news source" except Fox and certain news sites on the Internet. I've learned not to depend on the "major media" (which is quickly becoming the "minor media) for anything news-wise. That's a lesson many people will NEVER learn, and I'm sorry to know that. (American Thinker)

Church Supporters: "Let's Work Together"

Many archdioceses have gone bankrupt from paying million dollar settlements to victims of priests who have sexually abused them for years. Now they're facing yet another suit from a man who was abused 30 years ago by a now-dead priest. The church cites all their "good works" in their defense. I say it doesn't matter ho much "good work" they do if the church has a policy of "covering up" such abuse, moving the offending priest from church to church, never warning diocese members he's a sexual predator. This is so common, it might end up bankrupting the entire Catholic church. Someone now even wants to sue the Pope! And if it can be proven the Pope APPROVED the practice of moving offending priests around where they're not known, without warning possible victims, I'm all for it.

Put Him in the Dumpster

Vladmir Lenin, one of the early leaders in the murderous system of communism in Russia, the system responsible for millions of deaths and the enslavement of an entire people for more than 70 years, is STILL "enshrined," lying in state in Red Square. They should have gotten rid of him long ago. I say throw him in the dumpster with the rest of the trash. If ever Russia needed to make someone an "unperson," this is it.

No Dealing With Militant Islam

The militant Islamic terrorists will NOT talk to us. They're not interested in anything except killing non-Muslims, and nothing we can say to them will dissuade them. The only way to dissuade militant Islamic terrorists is to kill them before they can kill us. The "American policies" they blame are long preceded by militant Islamism, so that excuse doesn't fly. (Denver Mayor's Office)

Closeups Only, Please

Didja Ever notice that the pictures of Cindy Sheehan's "gatherings" are always close-ups? Never a wide "crowd shot." Much like those of other liberal gatherings such as the NOW gang, to avoid showing that there are only about ten or twenty people there. After criticizing Hillary in public, Cindy can't even draw the dozen or more she used to be able to "gather." In this picture, it looks like they're pretty much outnumbered by the Secret Service agents inside the fence.

Expelled for Having Gay Parents?

What the hell? In a country where it's against the law to discriminate against gays, a school has the audacity to expel a CHILD because her PARENTS are gay? Jeeze! Are they TRYING to "goose" the anti- or pro-gay folks into a fight? Do they WANT to have trouble with the feds? Some imbecile in the school office must have SOME kind of an "axe to grind," but for the life of me I can't figure out what it is. I don't have anything against gays, nor do I think they should be allowed to "throw it in my face" and teach my children that "gay is okay." But to expel a CHILD because her PARENTS are gay? How stupid is that? Sheesh!

Mugabe Deathly Afraid He'll Lose!

He's deathly afraid he's going to lose this election he's in right now. His government refuses to release the numbers while he plans a "runoff" election that might not really be necessary. He might have lost already, which may be why he won't release the numbers. He's a thug who conned his way into the presidency of Zimbabwe and has stolen a lot of land from "the little people" and has given it to his friends. He's afraid if he loses and is no longer "the president," his life is going to be a lot more constrained. He will no longer be able to steal people's land and give it to his rich friends, and maybe someone from whom he has stolen everything might even kill him. He's one of those people who are only alive because it's illegal to kill him. (CNN)

Why Do I Do This?

Attending the Sam Adams Alliance meeting yesterday caused me to question the reasons why I spend so much time blogging. Why do I sit at this computer and put my life in jeopardy by criticizing that "religion of peace," the Muslim religion where people want to KILL YOU for criticizing them, even for simply "DEPICTING" Muhammed in a cartoon? I'm sure I'm making a lot of enemies among elite liberals and those they have conditioned to believe as they do (I LOVE that!). Aside from keeping my mind busy (to stay alive longer), it's mostly because I see so many things happening in this world that are not only ignorant, but stupid, and I want to have a small part in correcting these things by bringing the TRUTH at least to those people who read what I've written. Ignorance can be corrected by an infusion of FACTS. Stupidity results when people refuse to accept facts when the proof is before their eyes. Liberals call me "cynical," and they're right--at least by my definition of "cynical." It is: "Somebody who has been around long enough to have seen most of it before, and is not surprised to see it again." Many people wonder why "senior citizens" seem to be "grumpy" all the time. I can answer that: it's because of the above sentence. They see so much ignorance and stupidity (that has happened before) and no one younger listens to them, and they GET grumpy. Yes, I'm a "grumpy old man." Now I know why, and I expect to be so for a while because I intend to be a "thorn in the side" of liberalism and socialism everywhere as long as I can. Maybe the Sam Adams Alliance and its Denver branch, Samsphere, can help me do that. I hope so.