UN Wants to Regulate Anything It Can

Anything it can con its members into ceding to them. Regulating planetary food and water sounds innocent enough, but what happens if, while “regulating” planetary food and water, they decide to put “strings” on it? If they “regulate” it, and withhold food and water until we do what they dictate, what does that make them? Don’t give them any more power than they now have. To do so is to create your own disaster. In fact, we need to get RID of them, altogether. They’re certainly not good for anything. They claim to be here to “keep the peace” in the world, but have they? Any time? What about the countries in which UN operatives have been screwing little girls under duress? What about the other atrocities UN people have committed? (Cowboy Byte)

Feds Block Taxas Law Requiring Picture ID

I have to show a picture ID to get a driver’s license; to buy insurance; to buy a pack of cigarettes; to get into certain buildings, INCLUDING Eric Holder’s Justice Dept. building. To do many things: so many things, in fact, that I no longer even think about showing it. Everybody gets ONE VOTE. But nobody is required to show “proof of ID” to exercise that right; to PROVE they are, in fact, who they are, and to guard against voting many times. A person could go from voting place to voting place voting many times, and I’m sure some do, without this requirement, which is simply a way of VERIFYING their identity. Except in Texas (and Indiana), where there’s a law requiring picture ID to be allowed to vote. Or there was, until Eric Holder, an un-elected bureaucrat, decided to BLOCK that requirement. What are the Democrats AFRAID of? That stealing elections will be harder for them to accomplish? They SAY it would be “hard on Hispanics.” Do they mean those Hispanics who are here illegally who CAN’T legally GET a picture ID? (Reuters)

What's Next?

Gays want to use the term “marriage” to describe their “arrangements.” I have nothing against their “arrangements,” but not under the name, “marriage.’ They’ve been offered everything they want EXCEPT the use if the term “marriage” and have turned it down. Some people say if that’s allowed, what’s next? “Marrying” their dogs? Apparently, one guy in Canada thinks that would be a good thing. He calls his dog, “my girl.” I’ve heard of guys calling their girls “dogs,” but this is ridiculous. I look for guys like this to be pushing for laws to allow them to “marry” their animals, soon. (The Blaze)

No Guns Involved

The anti-gun freaks hate it, but the most recent school killing happened in Chicago, WITHOUT a gun involved. So they can’t use it in their passion to get rid of every gun they can in the hands of good, honest people so they can use them to stop such things as this school killing, with a KNIFE. I’ve always wondered about the stupidity of people who think a LAW will stop a CRIMINAL, who breaks the law DAILY, from having a gun. All their laws do is give criminals a steady stream of unarmed victims for them to use their illegal guns to victimize.(Breitbart)

"Equal Justice" Under the Law

Last fall, a Muslim attacked a Pennsylvania man named Ernest Perce who had dressed up like Mohammed for a Halloween parade. The attack was caught on film, witnessed by dozens of parade watchers, and verified by a policeman. The Muslim was charged. But when he was brought before Cumberland County Judge Mark Martin, the judge dismissed the assault charges against the Muslim and dressed down the Pennsylvania man for being insensitive to the Muslim religion. Not only did Martin rule in favor of the Muslim attacker, he lectured Ernest Perce for insulting Islam: "Islam is not just a religion, it's their culture. It's their very essence; their very being… And what you've done is, you've completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very, very, very offensive. I find it offensive." Would this judge say anything to a Muslim who trashed the Christian religion? I don't think so. He's too stupid. I find his finding offensive. (Thanks to Conservative Byte.com)

What About Americans Killed By Taliban?

The Taliban in Afganistan have vowed “revenge” for the Afghans supposedly killed by an American soldier whom Afghan “witnesses” (who might be Taliban themselves) say just “started killing people for no reason.” I doubt it. He was probably defending himself from a Taliban attack and accidentally hit some women and children while doing so. Or the Taliban themselves killed them so they could blame it on that soldier. This is classic PR stunt of the kind usually used by the Taliban and other kinds of Islamic terrorists (Sorry, PC Police, I use my own choice of words. I don’t allow others to choose them for me.). My question is, how do you tell the difference between Taliban and “civilians?” You usually can’t, except the Taliban are probably shooting at you. (Detroit Free Press)

Fast & Furious

This should be a defining moment in politics and the men responsible FIRED, including Obama: the government “running guns” to the Mexican drug cartels and getting a Border Patrol agent KILLED. This is NOT “just” a political thing. It’s Brian Terry’s DEATH, and Obama is ultimately responsible because it couldn’t have happened without his knowledge and approval, no matter how much he may deny it—if he’s ever asked, which I doubt. The thug he’s got in charge of the DOJ says when he found out about it he STOPPED it. But when did he find out about it? Didn’t something like this REQUIRE his approval BEFORE it was done? If he didn’t know about it, he is INCOMPETENT, as is Obama. But neither will ever take the blame for this man’s death. Mark it. (Mary Chastain/Big Journalism)

Congress Passes Obama Impeachment Bill

But there has been no action on it i the Senate. I guess they’re hoping they can stall it in the Senate until after the election, hoping Obama will win and he can better quash it. One thing always in Obama’s favor is the tendency of Congress to “drag their feet” on anything “controversial.” But what’s “controversial” about impeaching Obama? The subject of this impeachment is but ONE reason we have to impeach this travesty of a president. What about spending more of (our) money than there IS on his “flights of fancy” masquerading as “green energy companies? Companies who quickly “take the money and run? Companies whose people have donated millions of dollars to his campaigns. Obama’s scam is so transparent we can all see how he is paying back his contributors by giving BILLIONS of OUR money to them while they go bankrupt and never pay it back while we can’t touch them because of the bankruptcy laws. Well, he DID promise to be “transparent.” And why is our source for this a patently conservative one? Because you’ll never read about this in the liberal media. (Conservative Papers)

What's WRONG With These People?

We’re suffering under extremely high gasoline prices and environmental idiots are still working to BLOCK any attempt to drill, anywhere, any time. In Erie, Colorado, a town so small they have a double-sided sign reading “Welcome to Erie” on both sides, they’ve banned “fracking” anywhere near town. Other towns in Colorado, including Longmont and Boulder have done likewise. I expect such stupidity from the “People’s Republic of Boulder,” but not from Longmont and Erie. I’ve always thought they were smarter than that. But apparently they aren’t (The Denver Post)

Town Hall Spikes Arpaio's Report

I can’t figure it out; why would Town Hall, a CONSERVATIVE outfit, “spike” Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s report that PROVES the “birth certificate” Obama released was a FORGERY. On the one hand, they rail against Obama and his refusal to release many of his records of his early life, including his birth certificate, but on the other hand, “spike” an article that PROVES Obama’s up to something and really MIGHT not be eligible to be president of the United States. I don’t know if they DID “spike” it, but if they didn’t, they should take steps to return it to their site. It’s VERY popular and its disappearance raises many questions—ones I’d rather not have to ask of the site that hosts one of my blogs. (World Net Daily)

Is Watching Muslims Wrong?

Muslim extremists murdered 3,000 innocent Americans on September 11, 2001. Since then, many people, almost ALL of them IDENTIFIED as being Muslims, have tried to murder more “in the name of Allah.” There have been countless murder attempts, some successful, some not so successful, with the perpetrator shouting “Allah is great!” At Ft. Hood, a Muslim SOLDIER took a gun and killed a lot of people and was even carrying a card saying, “Soldier of Allah.” A Muslim attempted to murder a Danish cartoonist for drawing a PICTURE of Mohammed. A Muslim tried to murder the POPE. What ELSE do we need to justify keeping a close eye on Muslims in this country? They’ve proven a penchant for using “deep cover agents” to kill people. People who are told to do nothing untoward, make no noises about “Jihad,” etc. until the time comes for them to act, who when captured spout Muslim extremist phrases. Watching Muslims is NOT a bad thing; it is COMMON SENSE and logic. Watching them closely is the only thing that has kept them from “overrunning” us. We’re not “rounding them up” and putting them in concentration camps as we did the Japanese under liberal FDR. We’re merely “keeping an eye on them.” There’s nothing wrong with that, and never will be, so long as militant Muslims continue to kill innocent people for not believing the same way they do. (Daily Mail)

In The Hospital

Been there since last Tuesday. The “official diagnosis” was, “idiopathic abdominal discomfort,” which translated means, “He had a stomach ache but we can’t figure out why but we’ll give it an official-sounding name.” It went away on its own after they subjected me to every painful and intrusive test known to man, and a few that haven’t even been invented yet. So I’m okay. The liberals can’t claim I’m out of business as they’re trying to do with Rush.

Media Lies About Rush Sponsors

They say he has lost 28 sponsors. That’s an out-and-out LIE and misinterpretation of the facts. He originally lose THREE sponsors and TWO of them have asked to come back. But was that reported? Was it also reported that he has three NEW sponsors since this debacle? I think this is just something else the liberal media has decided to “jump on,” true or not. It’s too bad our supposedly trusted media no longer think facts are important. I take ANYTHING the media says about Rush with a BIG “grain of salt. It’s usually a lie. The figures in this case came from George Soros’ Media Matters, whose output is ALL a lie. There’s even a rumor that Rush will be “suspended” for one week. That’s another lie. He'd have to “suspend” himself. (Rush Limbaugh)

How Cocky Are They?

The “Occupy (Everywhere)” movement and Muslim extremist leaders have come together for a strategy meeting and rally. They probably call it something else, but that’s how politicians (and that’s what they are) operate. Have meetings to screw the pubic right out in the open while calling their meetings something they aren’t, to fool the people. But the very fact that they are holding a meeting together tells me a lot about the OWS bunch. Not that I’m surprised. I’m only surprised they didn’t even try to keep their collaboration secret. The OWS bunch wants a “free ride” and the Islamic terrorists want to foment as much trouble as they can. So who’s surprised they’re now working together? (World Net Daily)

Why Isn't This Guy Unemployed?

Chris Matthews once famously said listening to Obama speak “sent thrills up my leg.” that was the best way I know to reveal his bias. Now he’s saying all Americans should get such a thrill when listening to Obama speak. What I want to know is, does he have an orgasm? And should we? How does somebody this STUPID keep his job? Because his bosses are just as stupid. Employing people as stupid as this guy is reveals just how stupid his employers are. They can no longer hide it after this fool blathers. (The Blaze)

Truth Is NOT "An Incindiary Attack"

The truth is NOT an “incendiary attack,” no matter what politicians like Mitt Romney call it. When he DOES start telling the truth about Obama he will insist on calling it something other than an “incendiary attack,” but that’s what it will be under his original definition. This is what I hate about politics: they redefine words to suit themselves, and we let them get away with it because too many of us just don’t pay attention—so we buy their bullsh-t. (Rush Limbaugh)

Mosques Nearly Double In US Since 9/11

This scares the hell out of me. It tells me the Muslims are trying to take us over by having children all over the place so they will soon OUTNUMBER us. What that happens, they can vote to do anything they want after a while. We need to start realizing that Islam is NOT a religion. It is a political philosophy MASQUERADING as a religion, and is bent on taking us over, one way or the other. If they can’t do it by force of arms, they’ll do it by outnumbering us in our own lawmaking bodies. That scares me. Because there isn’t much we can do to stop them under our current rule of law. And they realize that. So they just keep on having kids IN America and one day they’ll have enough votes to do what they wish. Fortunately for me, I’ll be dead (I hope) by then. (World Net Daily)

Chicago Gun Sales Up

They got rid of the ban on gun sales to private individuals in Chicago and gun sales went up accordingly. Even though they coupled it with onerous licensing, the number of licenses “granted” increased, a lot. People were arming themselves to defend their homes and families against illegally armed predators. But did you notice that the item announcing it made NO mention of whether the crime rate went up or down? Not surprising. Anti-gun crazies don’t want you to know that the violent crime rate probably went down. It usually does when honest people are allowed the means to their own defense. (CBS Chicago)

Narural Causes?

Andrew Breitbart is dead; of “natural causes.” At 43. Do you really think his death was from “natural causes” at age 43? Breitbart was a “thorn in the side” of most liberals, and I’m sure they are “dancing in the streets” at his death. But you know there ARE ways to kill somebody while leaving no trace. Is that what happened here? Will we ever know? We’re waiting for the autopsy, but will it tell us anything? Doubtful. People who are “thorns in the side’ to liberals sometimes end up dead from suspicious causes. God knows, enough of them died when Clinton was president, just before they were to testify to crimes he had committed. Rest in peace, Andrew. We hardly knew ye, but we loved what you did; those of us who love truth, that is. As an example of what to expect from liberals, I got a Tweet from a liberal troll fool pretending not to be liberal saying he's "dropped better turds than Breitbart was. (Newsday)

Obama Using IRS to Intimidate Tea Partiers

How brazen is this? Obama has directed the IRS to require Tea Party members to “jump through several hoops” including sending printed copies of their Facebook pages. They wanted information about their politics, contributors, and even family members. It’s a “sneaky trick” to “bury them in paperwork” supposedly to legitimize their actions. I’m just glad I don’t ask for permission to do what I do, but nevertheless, I expect a visit from the IRS one day with demands for information I’m not willing to give them. (Fox News)