Retroactive Abortion

Megan Huntsman wanted to abort her babies but she waited too long. If she’d killed them a few minutes earlier, while they were still in the womb, it would have been okay because that would have simply been abortion. But she strangled or otherwise suffocated six of seven babies AFTER birth, giving the term “afterbirth” a whole new meaning. One child was already dead, so she didn’t need to murder him/her as she did the others. To me, however, a parent who murders their baby while still in the womb is STILL just as guilty of murder as she, no matter what nine old men (and maybe one or two women) wearing black robes said, twisting the Constitution completely out of proportion. Abortion for medical reasons is okay, even to me. But for CONTRACEPTION purposes. It is NOT. This would be MURDER for the CONVENIENCE of the parents. And not for the result of rape, either. There is such a thing as ADOPTION, not murder.  What she did was a very loose look at what those “black robed fools” said. (CNN)