Global Warming Scam Based on False Data
"In the United States, the calendar year 1998 ranked as the hottest of them all -- until someone checked the math. After a Toronto skeptic tipped NASA this month to one flaw in its climate calculations, the U.S. agency ordered a full data review. Days later, it put out a revised list of all-time hottest years. The Dust Bowl year of 1934 now ranks as hottest ever in the U.S. -- not 1998. More significantly, the agency reduced the mean U.S. 'temperature anomalies' for the years 2000 to 2006 by 0.15 degrees Celsius. NASA officials have dismissed the changes as trivial. Even the Canadian who spotted the original flaw says the revisions are 'not necessarily material to climate policy.' [Of course. -RT] But the revisions have been seized on by conservative Americans, including firebrand radio host Rush Limbaugh, as evidence that climate change science is unsound." [It is. -RT] Unfortunately for them, the data they used IS "unsound. It always HAS been unsound. Notice how they try to "play it down." Notice also that they made no effort to change anything in their predictions, and AlGore ignored it completely, as he always ignores ANYTHING that tends to prove his scam wrong. Yes, those who believe Gore's scam is wrong use this as "evidence" that the science is unsound. We ALWAYS use TRUTH to prove these people wrong, and we always will. (The Star, 8/14/07)
"In the United States, the calendar year 1998 ranked as the hottest of them all -- until someone checked the math. After a Toronto skeptic tipped NASA this month to one flaw in its climate calculations, the U.S. agency ordered a full data review. Days later, it put out a revised list of all-time hottest years. The Dust Bowl year of 1934 now ranks as hottest ever in the U.S. -- not 1998. More significantly, the agency reduced the mean U.S. 'temperature anomalies' for the years 2000 to 2006 by 0.15 degrees Celsius. NASA officials have dismissed the changes as trivial. Even the Canadian who spotted the original flaw says the revisions are 'not necessarily material to climate policy.' [Of course. -RT] But the revisions have been seized on by conservative Americans, including firebrand radio host Rush Limbaugh, as evidence that climate change science is unsound." [It is. -RT] Unfortunately for them, the data they used IS "unsound. It always HAS been unsound. Notice how they try to "play it down." Notice also that they made no effort to change anything in their predictions, and AlGore ignored it completely, as he always ignores ANYTHING that tends to prove his scam wrong. Yes, those who believe Gore's scam is wrong use this as "evidence" that the science is unsound. We ALWAYS use TRUTH to prove these people wrong, and we always will. (The Star, 8/14/07)
No comments:
Post a Comment