Violence Is On Democrats

The Dumocrats love to accuse conservatives of the very things THEY are doing. That is never so obvious as when they try and make the world think they “fear conservative violence” when there are numerous reports of Dumocrat supporters committing violence on those with whom they disagree. Recently, an "anti-Trumper" drove his truck into a tent where Republicans were being registered to vote. In several cases, they just walked up to people who were espousing non-liberal causes and punched them in the face, In other cases, they saw a red “MAGA Hat,” and that “triggered them” into committing violence on th wearer. Sometimes just slapping the hat off the head of the wearer, but sometimes actually assaulting the wearer—for wearing a hat telling the world they support out president. In one case recently a woman attacked a man wearing a hat that only LOOKED like a MAGA Hat, causing serious injury, to the man, who was an ex-cop. That ex-cop wasn’t ashamed to file charges that she will have to face when she is caught—which she will be, because they have her face on record. I’d love to announce to the world my support for our president, but I’m 82 and can just barely walk. So I don’t want somebody to attack this old man because of what he’s wearing. So I’ll confine my support to this blog and my other writings so some cowardly Dumocrat won’t assault me. (The Blaze)

"Flim-Flam Woman"

Dumocrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren (finally) come out with her plan to finance her “Medicare for All” plan, and it is a doozy! It will cost $52 TRILLION, which is just about the amount of money the feds spend for ALL government operations. She says it will be the “biggest tax reduction in history” because she doesn’t plan to tax the middle class to pay for it. She plans to make the usual suspects, “the rich,” pay for it with a special “rich tax.” Never mind the rich don’t have enough money to finance her pipe dreams. Never did, never will. There aren’t enough of them, and they don’t make enough money. But she discounts that, as do most left-wingers with similar pipe dreams. What she proposes will BANKRUPT the United States. She disputes that, of course, but her numbers just do not add up. Other similar plans likewise do not add up. It’s all a “flim-flam” to get votes from people who want to live at the expense of others, of which there are way too many in this country. Another thing she ignores is having enough money to pay for the rest of government, after paying for her pipe dream. Someone who is so ignorant about the economy should never, ever, be allowed NEAR the Oval Office, except maybe as a visitor to the elected president. (Wall Street Journal)

Just Tell Me How

Anti-gun fools criticize people like me who actually see the senselessness of the laws they pass, and the impossibility of them actually DOING anything to reduce “gun crime.” They say we WANT more people to be murdered (not in those words, but that's the effect of what they say), and that’s supposed to be why we insist on retaining the constitutional RIGHT to be armed for self defense. So I want to ask them a simple question, and insist on a real answer, and not the usual name-calling in which they engage, to mask the fact that they HAVE no answer. The question is this: “Why do you insist on continuing to make laws that, in addition to NOT working to reduce “gun crime,” actually work to INCREASE it by disarming the law-abiding so they’ll be ‘easy targets’ for the law breakers?” Another question is: “What makes you think a CRIMINAL, who breaks laws for a living, will magically OBEY a law that says he cannot be armed when he commits his other crimes?” Criminals break laws. It’s in the name. So why not allow the law-abiding to be able to have guns for self defense? We kept our nuclear capability to keep international criminals such as communist Russia from victimizing us, so why can’t the law-abiding be armed, for the same reason? In Philadelphia, a city with one of the highest “gun death” rates outside of Chicago, 91% of “gun crime” is committed by people who are legally not allowed to have a gun. And those illegal guns number in the millions. So why can’t we be allowed to defend ourselves with a LEGAL gun? (The Enquirer)

Fox Is On A Suicide Mission

After the death of the early “Czar” at Fox News, the helm was taken over by younger folks who are known liberals. Non-liberals were instantly concerned, since Fox was the “bulwark” of true news, for years. Then liberals began appearing, not only as unpaid guests, but as paid “contributors,” too. When they hired a formed DNC Chair as a contributor, I knew they were on a definite slide into oblivion. They kept liberal anchor Shepard Smith on for a long time, in spite of his faulty reporting of Dumocrat talking points as news—until the criticism he was getting from other anchors became too much for him and he quit, to apply for a job at CNN and MSNBC, something that seems to be working out for him. He will be in a good place for him there—either one. But Chris Wallace wasn’t smart enough to seek employment elsewhere and keeps mouthing Dumocrat talking points as “factual” every day. He needs to go to CNN or somewhere like that, along with Shep. But maybe he won’t have to. Fox is now leaning so far left in their “news” coverage that he may continue to fit in there, after all, while Fox’s ratings begin to slide, along with other liberal-run outfits. One can only hope there will rise to prominence any other station that retains it’s insistence on truth—as Fox used to do. Yes, they “crossed” Trump. But they “crossed” us, too. And they will pay, in the long run, for beginning to put lies on the air. (DC Swamp Tales)

To Tax A Fart

The liberals have come up with something insanely stupid, and they think it is genius. They have embarked on a program to tax cow farts, saying (falsely) that the methane gas thus released is a “danger to the environment.” What they don’t realize (of course) is that all living beings fart, including liberals. But of course, they will make sure they don’t have to pay their “fart tax.” Cows fart. So do horses, and pigs, and all other farm animals. Non-farm animals fart, too. Human beings fart. Birds fart. Even bugs fart. We just can’t hear them. They’ve all been farting since the beginning of time, and the world is still here. Farting is normal. You can’t stop farting. Farting is necessary to expel that methane gas, or you’re going to be in a lot of trouble. Taxing farts is a blatant overreach by government, taxing a normal thing that nobody can stop doing. They’ve begun by applying a “fee” based on the number of cows on a ranch or farm. Next, they will suddenly “notice” what I’ve been saying, that all living beings fart, and what a “goldmine” that is for them to tax—if they can get away with the con, and they’ll try to tax everything that farts, which is every living being—and thereby will cause the failure as people realize the futility of taxing farts to be a “good thing” for the environment, and is just a way to tax us more. (Just common sense)

Hypocrisy Personified

Well-known anti-gun Chicago Alderman Ed Burke, who has been charged with extortion for telling Burger King that they had to send their legal business to his office to get any permits approved. And a permit application they’ve been trying to get issued for a long time was “magically” approved the same day they agreed. Now this guy has been in that office for fifty years, and actually “inherited it” from his father. Kinda like a small time king, I guess. And when they raided his office, they found that this anti-gun (for us) politician was “armed to the teeth.” They found 23 guns there. Alderman Burke is the embodiment of Chicagoland corruption, and has just been caught by the feds, not the locals or the state. Of course not. The “fix” is in. He sees to that. But it’s hard for a local politician to control the federal government. They have their own pay-off system that he was not part of. His mistake, and a “deadly one” to his political future—unless he can find somebody to bribe. Keeping those guns in his office was yet another violation of the law for which he should be charged—unless he can claim it’s for “security purposes,” since he’s such an important man. That’s what big-time politicians usually claim. It remains to see whether or not they are licensed. Chicago itself mostly is a “gun-free zone,” for everybody but cops and other “government agents.” An 1879 law “defining” an alderman as a “peace officer” might be the loophole he needs to avoid that charge. That “fix” has been “in” for a long time. (Truth About Guns)

Deadly Liberal Policy

If ever there was an obvious example of liberal stupidity it is the new policy in New York State forcing prosecutors to give their targets a “hit list” of witnesses about to testify against them so they can send somebody out to kill them before they can testify. Wilmer Rodriguez is one of the first victims of that liberal stupidity. Wilmer came to the defense of a young man who was in the process of being severely beaten and was beaten himself by the ‘gang members who were beating the boy and got beaten almost to death, himself, for his trouble. This courageous man was all set to testify against them in court when his name was ordered to be released to the defense attorney as part of pre-trial “discovery.” Immediately the gang began a pattern of intimidation against him which ended with them finishing the job and beating him t death. This policy should immediately be changed, or there are going to be many violent criminals freed as a result, and many witnesses murdered. Crime will increase as many violent criminals commit crimes they might not have committed if they knew the witness against them would be protected to they could complete their testimony and put them where they belong—in prison. The blood of the deaths of these witnesses are on the hands of those liberal politicians who impose these absolutely stupid policies. They should, themselves, be imprisoned for murder. (Twitter)

The Impeachment Scam

That’s what it is. Just the latest effort to reverse the result of the 2016 election, which they lost, big. They may have won the “popular vote,” because the coastal welfare states are so populous, and their “election fraud” has always worked, before. It did not, this time, and they’re wetting their pants daily because of it. But the Electoral College was established specifically to keep those coastal liberal states from controlling presidential elections and eliminating the wishes of what they call “flyover country” altogether. They call it “flyover country” because they really believe all the main parts of this country are only good to “fly over,” and nothing else. They have nothing, but they want to remove him from office because he’s doing what they should have done, long ago, and they don’t like that. Impeaching a president is easy if you have even small majority in the House. You’ve heard the old saying about a prosecutor being able to indict a ham sandwich if he wants to. The same is true when you hold even one vote more in the House and you can get all your people to vote for impeachment. Impeachment is just an ACCUSATION of wrongdoing, and any wrongdoing on the part of this president is only in their fevered minds. They don’t dare actually file articles of impeachment because that would give Trump what he needs to put a stop to them in the Senate—which includes the power to subpoena Dumocrats. A power only the Dumocrats have in the House while they stall with their endless, incessant “hearings.” So eventually they tried impeachment--and failed, again. So they're gonna try it, again. and again. they hope,until it works. (Just common sense)

"Concealed Carry Reduces Crime"

In Illinois, which was, until recently, the “last holdout” in the battle to increase the “concealed carry” numbers, finally passed a “shall issue” law to replace the “no issue” laws then in force. And crime predictably went down. Even in Chicago, where “gun crime” continues unabated (though somewhat reduced), in spite of their many tight anti-gun laws. In fact, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel disagrees, saying “shall issue” laws will INCREASE crime. This in spite of the sure numbers of crime reduction since the “shall issue” law was passed. He maintains that “gun control is still needed,” in spite of the sure fact that their anti-gun laws have done NOTHING to reduce crime, instead INCREASING it, by DISARMING the law-abiding, making them “Easy targets” for those who IGNORE their stupid laws. A recent “study” showed that “criminals don’t obey laws (they needed a STUDY to figure that out?). Which didn’t make a dent in their faulty thinking. They kept on making their silly, stupid laws, criminals ignored them, law abiding people obeyed them, and were victimized by the criminals, who don’t. (NRA-ILA)

Again and Again!

The Dumocrats couldn’t lynch Trump with impeachment because he wasn’t guilty of even the feeble “charges” they brought against him—with no proof of any wrongdoing among them, so they lost, and lost BIG when the Senate found him innocent. Of course, Nancy Peelosi refuses to accept that decision and says, “Trump didn’t really get acquitted.” Yes Nancy, he did. Whether you like it, or not. You don’t control the Senate like you do the house, where those accusations began. So now they’re going to go back to that old, discredited opposition to Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation, which they lost, too. Now they’re claiming the FBI “didn’t interview 30 witnesses” in investigating him on orders from the White House, and now they want to do it—a year later.

Of course, it’s a false notion, but it gives them cover to keep the spurious “investigation” going until the election—again hoping to derail Trump’s re-election. That they’ve misread the mood of the voters is obvious to anybody BUT Dumocrats, and they will lose again. One wonders what phony accusation they’ll make after that. Probably John Bolton. And, since Bolton really has nothing to add except his OPINION on policy, they’ll fail again. And come up with something else. As in the anti-gun fight, they demonstrate their insanity by doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result. They couldn’t impeach Trump, now they want to impeach Kavanaugh. After that fails, they’ll probably go back to impeaching Trump—again. (Western Journal)

Dems Won't Accept It

When it doesn’t go their way, as most things have not, recently, in their efforts to reverse the results of the 2016 election that put a non-politician in the White House—somebody they can’t control because he just doesn’t need the money they can move in his direction, therefore he can do what HE wants, not what they want. First they tried to convince the world Trump was a “Russian asset,” and they appointed a “special prosecutor” who found NOTHING. Then they tried impeachment, without ANY CRIME, and no=NO PROOF of any corruption, and lost. But they will not accept the acquittal because it didn’t go their way, as usual. Some Dumocrats are even saying President Trump was not acquitted. One of the stupidest statements they’ve ever made, among MANY stupid statements. Then Nancy Peelosi committed a felony in front of the world when she tore up an “official government document (Trump’s SOTU speech) while knowing she was on camera. That was about the most petty action I’ve seen from a woman who IS petty. She is blinded by her irrational hatred of Donald Trump, and should be removed from office because she is now senile and should not be making important government decisions. (Just common sense)

Got the Right Idea

The commission investigating the Marjory Stoneman HS killings is recommending that teachers be armed. Wow! Politicians with intelligence! Whoda thunkit? I’ve been telling them that for a long time, but most politicians just ignore me. Their minds are made up, so don’t confuse them with facts. I’m not advocating FORCING teachers and other school staff to be armed. I am merely saying we should allow those who are already “concealed carriers” to bring their guns to school with them so they can act to protect their students, and maybe themselves, as well. If we could find more people with intelligence to work in these committees, and the legislatures, we might begin to get a handle on “gun crime.” The solution to “gun crime” is NOT to ban guns. Those who wish to do ill with guns can, and do, easily get them illegally, so what’s the point of making laws they routinely break? The anti-gun fools think that allowing the law-abiding to bring their guns with them would cause them to “go wild” and shoot people for trivial things. Some have even gone so far as to say they would “probably” shoot their students! Schools have no business being “gun-free zones,” because those zones are an “engraved invitation” to people who want to kill people. “Gun-free zones anywhere are a bad idea, for that reason. (Sun Sentinel)

Democrats Will Destroy Us!

If you vote Dumocrat, you’ll be voting for the end of this country, as we know it. Dumocrats hate the coal industry, and at least two of them have promised to “close it down,” without even looking at the consequences of that act. We had a massive power outage the other day that lasted from 11 AM well into the night. I don’t know how long it lasted because I was swaddled in many blankets, asleep, because I couldn’t do anything without the electricity being on. No lights, no TV, no microwave (so I couldn’t eat anything, and even my daughter-in-law couldn’t help, because her stove is electric), and I couldn’t post anything to this blog because my WI-FI depends on electricity. So even if I had battery backup on my computer it wouldn’t matter because the WI-FI was out.

We take electricity for granted, until it disappears, as it did here when somebody “took out” a telephone pole containing several key hookups. There were 600 homes and businesses without power for a long time. You know something else that will take out the electricity? COAL. Without coal, there can be no electricity. Sure, some power companies use natural gas instead of coal, but there just isn’t enough of it to do the job. So we depend on coal, more than we know. Certainly more than any Dumocrat knows. Some Dumocrats want to give away many “freebies,” again not figuring what the result will be. One wants to pay everybody’s college tuition, which will cost more money than there is. Other dumocrats want to give away many other freebies, all of which will cost more money than there IS. Warren was asked how she would pay for her freebies and she replied, “There’s always money.” Yes, there is, if you can just “print money” with nothing valuable behind it, something Dumocrats have been doing for a long time.

Of course they ignore the fact that printing money is the sole cause of inflation, which by “diluting” the money already in circulation, takes money out of your pocket without having to resort to the Congress. And worst of all, they want to make this country into a collectivist (socialist) country, which will destroy us as a country because socialism produces NO NEW WEALTH, like the free market does. If a Dumocrat gets into the presidency, within a year we will become a “Soviet Gulag” under a different name—which will DESTROY us economically before they can even institute all their “freebies.” Dumocrats never think about the RESULTS of the “flights of fancy” they promise. They just promise them to get votes. Vote for any of them, you will be bringing us ever closer to oblivion, as communism (another form of collectivism) did in Russia. Don’t do it. (Just common sense)

Pelosi Is Outdated

She is a “shriveled up old crone” who thinks she actually has the knowledge of how this country should be run. She should be home in San Francisco tending to her knitting and feeding her cats instead of messing around in the workings of a major government. Of course when she goes out, she’d better be very aware of where she steps because of the brown stuff the policies her liberal friends have instituted have allowed to build up on the streets. She’s way too old and feeble to be of any good to this country. Moreover, her very ideas are an anathema to this country. She wants to get rid of the best president we have ever had because she’s mad at her party getting soundly whipped in the 2016 election.

A president that proved his predecessor WRONG when he said “the best is way behind us” and the “good economy will never come back” as an excuse because he didn’t have any idea how to BRING it back. Well, it HAS come back, with a ROAR! And in less than one four-year term. We are in better shape than we’ve ever been before, and she is so consumed with her “old woman’s hatred” she can’t see it, and wants to be rid of the man who brought it back and is continuing to work on making it even better. Don’t give me a hard time about calling her “old.” I’m just as old as she is, but I wouldn’t pretend to know how to run a major government. Or to judge the man who does, or the stamina to do it if I did. Neither does she, but she isn’t smart enough to recognize it. I just watch the RESULTS and go from there. (Just common sense)

"Combating Gun Violence"

What liberals call “combating gun violence” is as much of a scam as is “climate change/global warming.” It’s based entirely on a phony premise: that you can just “make a law,” and everything will be okay. The fact that criminals and other miscreants just IGNORE those laws is just “icing on the cake.” It just gives them yet another opportunity to make more new laws that don’t work, and to create new “fees and taxes” to “help in combating gun crime.” The fight never ends, as with climate change, and the anti-gun fools continue to profit from it, while governments get to create even more taxes so they can “better fight gun crime.” It is just as much of a swindle as is climate change. They just have not had to change its name (yet) to maintain “believability.” So every time some fool misuses a gun he usually has gotten illegally, gives them yet another opportunity to clamor for more useless laws and regulations, while people DIE because of it, since the law-abiding are DISARMED, and rendered DEFENSELESS in the face of the millions of illegal guns out there. (Just common sense)

Power Out Yesterday

My computer doesn’t have a battery backup, so, no postings.

"Republicans Are Unhinged":

That’s what Dumocrats tell us, while Dumocrats can only stand by demonstrating their uncontrollable rage over the accomplishments President Trump is enjoying. They tell us they’re frightened of Republicans while they go about setting fires and knocking “MAGA hats” off people’s heads, creating riots to keep people with whom they do not agree from making speeches, screaming in their faces and licking their phones. Then there are the ones who walk up to conservatives and punch them in the face, then run away. Liberals (Dumocrats) are well known for accusing their “enemies” of the very things they are, themselves, actually DOING, and this is the most obvious. That ubiquitous “ANTIFA” crowd does not violently attack those on the left. They were actually CREATED by Dumocrats to take the place of their previously created KKK to “kick butt” because they cannot answer us with facts, so they scream and cry and twist their hankies while we get things done. And that’s what makes them even angrier. (Clash Daily)

They Just Want Control

Politicians have no interest in “gun safety,” except for themselves when they come to take our property under cover of the law. But that is secondary. Their basic wish is to control as much of our lives as they can, and “gun control” is a major part of control of our lives. Anti-gun laws don’t work. That has been proven many times, in many ways. They say the cops can protect us. WRONG! Sure, the cops try hard to do that, but they can’t be everywhere at once. It takes them from a few minutes, to HOURS or in some places, DAYS to respond to a call for help. Admittedly taking hours or days is rare, but it happens. The important thing is that even those taking MINUTES to arrive will usually arrive AFTER the crime has been committed, and the people injured, or killed. Anti-gun fools love “gun-free zones” for some reason or other in spite of the fact that shooters SEEK OUT gun-free zones in which to do their crimes because they hope to find no guns there to oppose their atrocities. And almost ALL mass killings have happened IN gun-free zones for that reason. This is logic. All their other anti-gun laws suffer the same, because they only apply to the law-abiding, while criminals just ignore them. This is the fatal flaw in their reasoning if they are really interested I “gun safety and control, which they are not. (Just common sense)

Knife Attack in UK

So “gun crime” was getting out of hand in the UK, so they just about BANNED guns, pretty much altogether, for the law-abiding. They don’t count the law BREAKERS, who get their guns anyway. But did gun crime go down? Not so’s you’d notice it. The latest attacker, after shouting “Allah,” said, “As long as you keep bombing other cities, this kind of sh-t is going to happen.” This, of course, ignores the fact that Muslim extremists have been bombing OUR cities, and causing other kinds of attacks our bombings were in retaliation for. Extremists never think about the retaliation for their own attacks, and count it only as an attack upon themselves “without cause,” in their opinion. But, back to the original thesis: banning guns to “reduce gun crime.” It does NOT. It only forces it further underground, or causes the attackers to use other tools, such as a knife. So now “knife crime” is raging. There are now more attacks with knives than with guns. So now London’s mayor (a Muslim) wants to ban knives! Will that do anything good? Not a chance. As with the banning of guns, bad guys will just use something else. This will become evident, if it is not already—to those of us with INTELLIGENCE, anyway. But those in power will no doubt continue their useless, ineffective bans on the TOOLS the bad guys use in their attacks, They’re stupid that way. (Channel News Asia)

Bored Politicians

Sometimes I wonder at the things some politicians put forward. It seems like they’re bored, don’t have enough to do, and want “a project,” no matter how stupid it is. One such is the bill now in Congress to ban certain hair styles. What the HELL do they think gives them the right to DICTATE people’s hair styles? Another is gun control. Gun control is a useless endeavor. If you ban a gun, law-breakers will get their guns ILLEGALLY. They ARE law-breakers, after all. Why do we call them that? Because they break laws! So no amount of anti-gun laws are going to stop them from getting their guns and victimizing the law-abiding, who DO obey laws, even when they’re STUPID laws. That makes them DEFENSELESS against those millions of illegal guns in the hands of those law-breakers. That just makes it easier for the law-breakers to victimize the law-abiding, just the opposite of what they CLAIM their laws are supposed to do. So why do they insist on making even more of them every time some fool takes an ILLEGAL gun and shoots somebody? Because they don’t have enough to do, and are bored. I get really tired of writing the same words over and over, but I will continue to do so until anti-gun fools “wise up,” which will probably be never. They just don’t have the intelligence. (Black Doctor)