"Second Doesn't Apply"

The National Association of Colored People” (NAACP) says, “Events show the Second Amendment doesn’t apply to colored people.” Really! People have tried, many times, to say the Second Amendment doesn’t apply to this, or that group, but it doesn’t alter the fact that the Constitution itself, does not mention whether or not people can be excluded from coverage on the basis of the color of their skin. It says, “ALL the people.” All the people INCLUDED those whose skin is a darker color. Yes, it has been shown that the largest number of shooting deaths are black men, killed by back men. That does not mean that ALL black men should be excluded fro being armed for self defense, under the Constitution. The decision on whether a man (or woman) can be armed must be decided on a case-by-case basis, based on their ACTIONS. If their actions are of a criminal nature, THEN they should be denied the use of a gun. Of course, they will then go and get one ILLEGALLY, but then, they are CRIMINALS, so they, by definition, do not obey laws. So the only people who can be excluded successfully from “bearing arms” are those who OBEY laws and they are not usually the problem. (NAACP)

Criminals Prosecuting the Innocent

It’s disgusting the way the DC  “law” allows the criminals to prosecute an innocent man. That’s exactly what is happening in DC today, as corrupt politicians try and trump up “charges” against President Trump. What they’re doing is painfully obvious. They thought they had the 2016 election “in the bag” for Hillary, and he “wiped their rears” for them.” That made them very angry, and they immediately determined to reverse the results of that election by using the law to “get rid of Trump” before the next election, hoping to “poison the well” against him so much the voters will turn against him. In that they have failed miserably, because as impeachment efforts continue Trump’s numbers continue to rise. They are desperate to get him impeached BEFORE the next election, because they know they cannot beat him in 2020 in an honest election. So they hope to get him impeached in the House, and “convicted” in the Senate, BEFORE the 2020 elections, hoping that will “get rid” of him. But I predict that the Senate will NOT “convict” him of those insipid “charges” they came up with. And even if they did, he will be re-elected for another four years, which he will use to further “drain the swamp,” the “swamp dwellers” having failed in all their attempts to unseat him. They’ve accused him of “abusing his power” for asking the Ukrainians to investigate a known law-breaker that happens to be the son of a man he would have beaten soundly, anyway. But the only “abuse of power” has been committed by the swamp dwellers in their efforts to impeach him. (Just common sense)

Libs Hate Pratt's Shirt

They call it racism, of course, their usual phony epithet. It has nothing to do with race. Why do they hate it? Because it says “Don’t Tread on Me” while they spend most of their time “treading on people’s rights, and they can’t have that. It’s against their “rules” They want to keep treading on people’s rights with their stupid, ineffective, unenforceable anti-gun laws, and that shirt points out the fallacy of their efforts. So they hate it. And that’s not all. They hate anything that points out their stupidity and bullying ways, so they want to ban it, and Chris Pratt refuses to do so. So they’ll probably demand a boycott of his films. Good luck with that. Chris Pratt is one of the “most bankable stars in Hollywood” right now, and they aren’t going to cut off their noses to spite their faces. At least, I THINK they aren’t that stupid, but you never know. Pratt is an anomaly in Hollywood, being a proud conservative. He is a hunter, and that makes liberals wet their pants. And he doesn’t “knuckle under” to their bullying, and that makes them crazy(er). We need more like him in Hollywood, to counter the liberals already there, in powerful positions. (Bearing Arms)

Another Gun Control Failure

In California, where some of the stiffest anti-gun laws in the country are in force, gun crime should be almost non-existent, right? WRONG! Gun crime in California is UP 18%! No longer is Chicago, and other liberal-run cities our only “showcases” for gun control failure. This proves, yet again, that those “tight anti-gun laws” do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun crime,” and in fact, INCREASE it by disarming honest people so the criminals, with their illegal guns, can more easily victimize them. As they say in this article, this provides a “target-rich environment” for criminals who want to be pretty sure nobody will be able to shoot back when they attack. They admit this failure of their anti-gun laws, and then go on to pass even more of them. We point out the fact that their laws don’t work, and they can’t answer, so they immediately start calling us names, and imputing ulterior motives to our wish to retain our right to self defense, and to own and use the means to that end, a gun. I’m getting really tired of pointing this out, and being ignored, while people die. (Breitbart)

"One and Done"

That’s the way it’s supposed to be in our jurisprudence. That means that you can’t prosecute somebody more than once. After he’s found not guilty, you’re done. Even if he goes on TV and brags about being guilty after he is acquitted, he cannot be tried again. Not so with the president of the United States, apparently. His accusers can go on and on and on and on, and if one accusation falls through, bring up another. And keep doing it, time after time, for years, if necessary, until you find something you can make into something for which you can “bring him down.” And you can use millions of dollars in taxpayer money to do it, and there’s nothing the chief executive can do about it. There should be some kind of a limit on just how many times they can “investigate” a president and find NOTHING, then come up with yet another phony charge, and tell the world how guilty he is, with NO EVIDENCE to back it up, slandering him. He can’t sue you for slander because he’s a public figure, so you’re safe from retaliation—mostly. And people who have demonstrated their hatred for the “subject” should never be allowed to be the “judge” of the “evidence.” A MURDERER gets more rights than does the president, and leader of the free world. It’s not right, and we need to change to system. President Trump is being the victim of the biggest conflict of interest there has ever been. (Just common sense)

Hate Speech Hysteria

Facebook has deleted a quite from St. Augustine as racist. Here is the quote. See if you agree. “Let us never assume that if we live good lives we will be without sin; our lives should be praised only when we continue to beg for pardon. But men are hopeless creatures, and the less they concentrate on their own sins, the more interested they become in the sins of others. They seek to criticize, not to correct. Unable to excuse themselves, they are ready to accuse others.” From what I can see, and I am intelligent, what this quote says is, “Shut up about others’ faults until you get rid of your own.” There is nothing racist about this quote, and to impute racism into it is stupidity beyond imagining. Facebook is really going out of its way to facilitate phony racist charges. What their purpose is, I don’t know. I do know they are eroding their customer base, as people leave their platform for other platforms, and they eventually go broke. Admittedly, I do have a Facebook page, but I rarely ever go there, and I don’t rely on Facebook, in any way, to get my message out. (Legal Insurrection)

The Germans Get It

Word is, application for gun carry permits have increased 130% since Chancellor Angela Merkel opened the borders and allowed just anybody to come in. “Following the mass sexual assaults on women in Cologne and other German cities on the 2015 New Year’s Eve, many Germans have lost their faith in the state and law enforcement when it comes to tackling migrant crime. ‘Rising perceptions of insecurity have been cited as a key factor in the increase in issued licenses,’ the broadcaster reported.” Hmmm...Germans have “lost confidence” in the cops to protect them. No kidding. The cops themselves (those in the trenches, anyway) will tell you they CAN’T “protect them.” All they can do is arrive AFTER the gunfire ends, clean up the scene, dispose of the bodies (if any) and send the wounded to the hospital, then question everybody to see if maybe they can find and prosecute the shooter. That is, in no way, protection. The ONLY real protection is a a gun in the hand of a law-abiding person to MATCH the gun in the hand of the law BREAKER, who will always be able to get a gun, no matter how tight the anti-gun laws are. Until that happens, there will always be those precious MINUTES it takes the cops to get there with their guns, and that can mean DEATH for the law-abiding, who are “easy targets” for criminals, with their ILLEGAL guns. (Legal Insurrection)

The Amazing Democrats

It amazes me what the Dumocrats think is bad, and what they therefore attack President Trump over. They condemn him for “attacking everybody,” completely ignoring the fact that his “attacks” are IN RETURN for their incessant false attacks. They criticize him for criticizing that “teenage activist,” Greta Thunberg. Frankly, what she is doing, and how she does it merely shows me she needs “anger control.” She’s too young to know ANYTHING and pretends to know more than ALL adults with her tirades. They take him to task for “hindering” Planned Parenthood, forgetting that PP is “Baby Murder, Incorporated.” They commit bloody murder on a class of people who are completely defenseless, while still in the womb (so far, mostly), with the full approval of the parents, who do not want the responsibility of raising the result of unprotected sex. So they “put out a contract” on them, and PP happily becomes their “hired killer,” for a price. Thunberg is angry over “global warming/climate change,”” which is a MANUFACTURED “crisis,” created by former VP AlGore, to line his pockets with gold, but she hasn’t been ALIVE long enough to know that. It has been disproved many times, but he goes right on talking about it and collecting money, hand over fist, while Greta does the same for herself and her “handlers.” This girl is so strange, that in a world where people travel long distances by airplane, she crosses the ocean in a SAILBOAT. And her “handlers” support her in that, time-waster that it is. (Just common sense)

Wishful Thinking

At the University of Michigan, they found a noose in an employee’s desk. They “investigated,” breathlessly telling people it was a “noose,” which, of course, implies racism, which they badly want to happen so they can make more racist claims. Following an extensive “investigation” by the university’s Division of Public Safety and Security (DPSS), they found it wasn’t a noose, at all. It was just some employee practicing knot-tying on his break. Of course, “If relevant information comes forward, they will reopen the investigation.” So if you race-baiters can pony up some “information,” maybe you can create a racist scare. It was actually a “Uni Knot,” one used extensively in fishing. Admittedly, it does somewhat resemble a noose. But anybody who likes to fish should know the difference and not jump to conclusions. When this story first broke, it was dutifully reported with glee by liberal news organizations. This is yet another example of the panic fostered by liberals accusing anybody and everybody of racism if they had the temerity to oppose them. (Legal Insurrection)

Gun Control: A Pipe Dream

There is no way in HELL they can get rid of ALL guns—which is the goal of all anti-gun fools. It’s a pipe dream--something that was conceived in an opium den after hours of smoking dope. They might be able to get rid of all LEGAL guns, but they will never be able to stop criminals from both selling and buying guns ILLEGALLY. Or stealing them. There isn’t a single law now on the books that has ever done a single thing to limit the use of guns for illegal purposes. All their laws do is make it easier for those criminals to victimize those who obey laws and are thus disarmed, and “easy targets” for their “gun violence.” Background checks, for example: all they do is allow the cops to trace a gun to its owner—IF it was bought legally, AFTER the fact. The person shot is already dead, or in big trouble, with massive hospital and doctor bills, maybe to have lifelong disabilities that stem from being shot. “Gun-free zones” are another pipe dream that has not only NOT stopped any gun violence, it has CONTRIBUTED to it. Each and EVERY mass shooting has occurred IN a “gun-free zone,” and new ones are being heard of, every day. The same is true of all the rest of their laws. (Just common sense)

Where Are the Crimes?

The House Committee “Chairmen” have been touting a bunch of “provable crimes” against President Trump, but when they finally, after al the hoopla, get around to actually FILING articles of impeachment, they can only claim a couple of insipid “violations” that nobody with any intelligence at all would ever say “rises to the level of impeachment.” NONE of their previous claims have proven true, because they are NOT true. But they “press on,” with nothing, so they can say Trump :has been impeached,” during the 2020 election, hoping that will make some of his supporters rethink their support, and then vote Dumocrat. But it ain’t agonna happen. It didn’t happen with Clinton, and he WAS guilty of the actual crime of lying to Congress. Trump has done too many good things for this country, and even all their efforts to keep America from knowing it, they KNOW. And they’re not going to vote against him. The liberal media has done their best to hide the good things he has done, but failed. There are too many other sources of information to keep us from finding out the truth. The coup is failing, yet again. But the Dumocrats don’t know it, and are keeping the incessant “investigations” going, while coming up with NOTHING. (The Blaze)

Stupid Liberal Ideas

Every day, the liberals seem to come out with yet another stupid idea. That is never more true than in the case of gun control. Their latest on that is this: “If more people would learn how to play a guitar, there would be fewer shooting deaths.” Now Corey Booker wants to sic the IRS on the NRA. They can’t seem to stop them from ruining their unconstitutional plans any other way, so now they’re going to try and ruin them from within by finding something they can use against them in their taxes. The same ploy they want to use on President Trump. Never any new ideas, those liberals.

In Ohio, there’s a bill in their legislature to charge an individual with a felony if a minor steals their gun. Cory Booker thinks toy guns are more regulated than are real guns. And then Corey Booker (again) compares gun control to the civil rights movement. Of course, they all think the elderly can’t be trusted with a gun. I don’t think a LIBERAL should be trusted with a gun. Now they think we should ban crossbows! There are so many crossbows being used in gang shootings and robberies, and murders these days, you see. It’s a big problem.

Kamala Harris (Dumocrat presidential candidate) thinks she can criminalize gun sales if she ever gets to be in the Oval Office (which is not likely since she just dropped out). Never mind that the absolute RIGHT for every American to be armed is a basic constitutional right, with one entire amendment devoted specifically to it. Like most liberals, she thinks she can just run right over that with an executive order. Liberals think if you get pregnant, what’s in the mother’s body is NOT a human being, so they can murder it, at will. One liberal Dumocrat actually SAID that. Back to guns. Liberals think the way to self defense is to disarm yourself. They actually think they can get rid of all the guns in the world, by legislation, and that the holders of illegal guns will all turn their guns in.

And they think that CRIMINALS, who disobey laws for a LIVING, will somehow decide to obey their gun laws. This item started out to be just about guns, but it has taken on a life of its own, so I’d better just stop writing now, or I’ll go to my grave still listing more stupid liberal ideas. (Just common sense)

The Case Against Self Defense

What liberals call the “gun controversy” is actually something else. It is the “self defense controversy.” Anti-gun fools want to “get rid of all guns” as a means to destroy self defense as a human right—for everybody except themselves, of course. They will retain their “right” to hire armed thugs to defend them while denying the rest of us the same right—if they can. They can afford it, because WE are paying for it, for the most part. Their armed thugs are paid for with taxpayer money. Some even go so far as to carry their own guns. But it is becoming increasingly obvious that liberals want to make the very concept of self defense illegal. They want to punish people who defend themselves against an attack. Every time we come up with something that helps us defend ourselves that is not a gun, they want to ban it, too. Currently on their list to be banned is the stun gun. It is a very effective instrument to stop an attacker in his tracks without killing him. But liberals don’t like them because they DO “stop an attacker in his tracks.” I was once accosted by a cop who saw a metal 2-cell flashlight in my pocket, who said, “That could be used as a weapon, you know.” To which I replied, “If and when I ever do use it for a weapon, we can discuss it, then.” He just laughed, but it was very instructive because liberals are serious about destroying ALL tools for self defense. (Just common sense)

Dog and Pony Show

That’s what the Dumocrats are putting on in DC now. They’re bringing in anybody they can think of who MIGHT have had SOME association with the Trump administration and asking them what they THINK about what’s going on, not what actually happened. Meanwhile, committee chairman “Pencil Neck” Schiff is refusing to allow any Republican to ask a question, and even is refusing to recognize a Republican member of his committee when they try to make a “point of order,” which, under the usual rules of order, MUST be allowed. But not in Schiff’s committee, because that seems to be what this is. Schiff is making all the rules, and changing them in mid-stream as it suits him. This country was built on the concept of “innocent until proven guilty,” but that’s not how Schiff is operating. He brings up all kinds of silly “charges,” and demands that Trump prove he is innocent. The fact that none of these charges has any basis in truth doesn’t seem to bother him. He is operating as if he were a dictator, making rules to suit himself, muzzling anybody who doesn’t agree with him, and painting any opposition as “obstruction of justice,” as if what he is doing IS “justice.” It is NOT. It is a “Kangaroo Court.” This is simply an attempted coup to remove a legally-elected president that he doesn’t like. (Just common sense)

Why Not Admit It?

Chicago “gun crime” problems are MOSTLY street gang problems. That is obvious to intelligent people, but they won’t admit it. The University of Chicago Crime Lab researchers tell us that “gun crime” is mostly limited to “specific neighborhoods.” Those are neighborhoods infested with street gangs. They even know this, but they hesitate to SAY it. Most gun crime in any large city can be traced right back to gang violence—in addition to other kinds of “gun crime.” But anti-gun fools everywhere don’t bother to try and do something about the street gangs, whose guns are ALL illegally gotten. So they want to make LAWS for the law-abiding to obey, and the law breakers to ignore. Street gangs break laws. Every day. They run drugs, numbers, extortion schemes, and many other kinds of criminal activity. So why do they expect these gangs to OBEY their silly anti-gun laws? Do something about gangs, and you will automatically “reduce gun violence.” They have to know that, so why don’t they DO it? Gun violence in Chicago IS going down. But for how long, with all the many gangs? (The Trace)

Arnold Tells Another Lie

Like all other anti-gun fools, actor Tom Arnold, famous for being dumb enough to have married Rosanne Barr, and has ONE successful movie on his list, tells us, “80% of gun owners shoot themselves.” Now, anybody of even modest intelligence knows that is a lie, but apparently he does not. He is anti-gun, and he doesn’t care if he has to lie to support that. Somebody ought to tell this fool that nobody cares what he says, and never have. He “piggy-backed” on another celebrity, and it won him ONE role that made him “successful,” and then a string of flops. He still rides the notoriety of that ONE role, to this day. He hasn’t done anything else of note, but he can’t figure out why. And he figures that one movie should help him to even more success, while it has not. And will not. He would do well to keep his mouth shut. Many people FEEL he is stupid. Then he opens his mouth and removes all doubt. (Bearing Arms)

Cock and Bull Story

I’ve had the sound muted on my TV all day, because Fox News is going “wall-to-wall” with the “dog and pony show” the House is putting on to pretend they were trying to “decide” whether or not to impeach President Trump, and didn’t already have their minds made up. I’ve had it muted because I quickly got tired of hearing those representatives making speeches disguised as questions for the “witnesses,” most of whom are “anti-Trumpsters.” I put “witnesses” in quotes because all they are “testifying” to is their “opinions and feelings” on what they THINK Trump was thinking when he did certain things. They keep saying that President Trump only did things “for his political purposes, rather than for the good of the nation. How they figured that is a mystery. Maybe they consulted their crystal balls. In any case, the things he did were things presidents do, every day, in running this country. Such as putting pressure on other heads of state to investigate a criminal. That that criminal was the son of his opponent was merely unfortunate, in that it made it LOOK like the investigation he wanted was to hinder his political opponent. As if he needed it to beat Joe Biden, which he does not. Joe has never had a chance in hell to be elected president, and even Dumocrats know it, from the time he quit his other try because of his plagiarism. (Just common sense)

To Destroy Self Defense

I’ve been trying, for some time, to figure what the real purpose of gun control is, since none of their efforts have done a single thing to stop, or even slow down, “gun crime.” Yet they keep insisting on making more and more of their useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws that do nothing except make “easy targets” of law abiding people who obey laws, while criminals and other miscreants just ignore them and get their guns illegally. After much thought and consideration, I have come to a conclusion; that they aren’t after “gun control,” they’re after PEOPLE control. They want to be able to tell us what we can, and cannot do. What we can buy and use, and what we can’t buy and use, whether it be a gun, or anything else. They figure that if they can get rid of the very concept of self defense, and be able to tell us we cannot buy and use legal products, they can extend that to everything. Liberals (Dumocrats) have a favorite saying: “it’s a good start.” Meaning that any small victory they get “paves the way” for more. And I believe their primary goal is to get that power, and gun control is the avenue to it. (Just common sense)

Passed A Background Check

Not being a felon, he had no trouble passing. Then he took his newly-purchased (legally) gun, and went out and killed a bunch of people with it. Another man couldn’t hope to pass a background check because he was either a felon, or had exhibited some mental health shortcomings, so he went out and found another felon in a back alley selling guns out of his trunk, and bought what he needed. Buying guns on the black market requires no background check. Then he took his newly-purchased gun and killed a bunch of people with it. Now I ask you: “What earthly good is a gun law if it doesn’t stop such things?” And the unalterable fact is, none do. They never have. All the anti-gun laws, all over the world, have done NOTHING to stop, or even slow down, “gun violence.” So what the hell good are they? Anti-gun fools have to know this. God knows, I’ve told them every chance I get. But they continue to insist on the making of more and more of them, in spite of the sure knowledge that they do NOTHING. What’s WRONG with these people? Don’t they ever learn from experience? Apparently not. (Just common sense)

The Failed Coup

Dumocrats are angry. They couldn’t cheat enough to overcome the “Trump juggernaut” in 2016. They thought they had it “fixed” to get Hillary Clinton elected, and failed. Trump won, and they just can’t handle that. A non-politician who didn’t follow their rules was elected, and they determined to do everything they could to make sure he got nowhere in his promise to “drain the swamp,” because most of them WERE “the swamp.” They had to get rid of him before he got to them. So they started “investigating” him, and have been doing it ever since the day he was elected. They claimed many ties to have “ample evidence” of his wrongdoing, but never told us what it was, because there wasn’t any. They tried many approaches, and when one failed, they began another, incessantly. Their campaign is now approaching three years, and they have found NOTHING they can use to get rid of him, so they’re now in the process of “making it up.” They are DEFINING things to be grounds for impeachment that nobody ever thought possible. They are GOING to impeach him, DURING the 2019 election period, hoping to skew it in their direction so they can gain back control of the Senate, which would assure their success in railroading him out of office before he can “bring them to justice.” (Just common sense)