I'm Worried About Nancy

She's showing distinct symptoms of early onset Alzheimer's. In a recent 7 minute speech, she stumbled and mispronounced several simple words, and mispronounced the names of several countries. After her 7 minutes, she thanked them, then stood staring into space for a few seconds, before walking off stage. In an interview on another network, she called Trump “The Diverter In chief,” then proceeded to divert attention from her own failings by repeating, over and over, that Trump “had no jobs bill.” Of course, he doesn't NEED a “jobs bill.” He creates jobs by getting rid of unnecessary, jobs-killing regulations, and getting rid of laws that also kill jobs. Nancy better retire before her symptoms become so obvious they won't be able to cover them up, any more. (American Mirror)

Death To Their Cause

Liberal anti-gun fools (a redundancy, there) hate judge Gorsuch, because they know he is “death to their cause” of disarming every man or woman in America. They know that, if he is confirmed (and he was), it will make the Supreme court more “friendly” to non-liberal causes for a long time. And they can't have that, so they tried everything they could to derail his confirmation. For them, it's a losing proposition. And looking forward to the NEXT Supreme Court appointee is even worse, for them. Because if it comes while Trump is still president (which it probably will, with two current members already talking about retirement), it will change the makeup of the Court for decades to come. They KNOW Gorsuch is a “gun-friendly” judge, and they were TERRIFIED he he was confirmed. Which will ruin their chances to make Americans defenseless for a long time, as he rules properly on the Second Amendment, and creates rulings that will make it even harder on them. (National Shooting Sports Foundation)

More Bloomberg Rejection

Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, now the chief anti-gun fool in the country, has suffered many defeats to his extreme intentions. All of them lately in his anti-gun efforts. He should have stayed in New York, where he was a little more successful (running for an ILLEGAL third term, and winning). His latest defeat is in New Mexico, where they rejected his latest effort to get his gun control bills passed into law, making it harder for people to be able to buy guns (and thus be DEFENSELESS against all the ILLEGAL guns already out there). His proposed laws would have only taken guns away from law-abiding people, and would have done NOTHING to stop, or limit gun sales made ILLEGALLY. which is a feature of ALL the gun laws I've ever seen. He spent a quarter million dollars this time, which is “pocket change” for him. It was a half-hearted effort for him, maybe because he's getting “tired of losing,” and he knew he had NO chance in a state like New Mexico, which has a long history of being “gun friendly.” (NRA-ILA)

The Death of Free Speech

I'm old enough to remember back in the sixties when liberals were all for freedom of speech. They still are, but now only if that speech agrees with them. They do everything they can to STOP freedom of speech if it comes from a non-liberal source like Ann Coulter or any other conservative speaker. Then they riot, break things and hurt people to keep her from speaking. They're so frightened that what she says might be HEARD by someone that they want to stop her from speaking, altogether. That tells me something. If they're scared of what she might say so badly they RIOT to keep her from talking, what she says IS important, and I, for one, want to hear it. At the same time, it makes them smaller in my eyes, and in everyone else's eyes. (Breitbart)

There's "No Evidence"

The current Democrat insistence (without any kind of proof) that Trump colluded with the Russians to get elected aside, there's another situation for which there is NO EVIDENCE to support. That's the “climate change” campaign. That “flight of fancy,” only supported by “fake science” and computer models with NO real proof, is widely believed by many damned fools, from AlGore, who was the first well-known personality to push it (and it has made him a billionaire), and Barack Obama. The original name of this swindle was “global warming,” but had to be changed, when it was found that the globe has NOT been “warming” for almost 20 years, so they could attribute ANY weather anomaly to it, and keep the money rolling in. They can't prove ANYTHING, and they know it. So now they want to make being a “climate change denier” a criminal offense, and either put “deniers” in prison, or fine them a lot of money. That's one way to shut them up without the bother of having to answer their charges, I guess. (Just common sense)

Obamacare Based On Lies

Obamacare was promoted by lying to us. We were told that if we liked our doctor, we could keep him/her; same with our hospital or health care plan, if we had one, Then that rates would go down by half; they TRIPLED, and the deductibles became thousand dollar deductibles, making the insurance USELESS. Obamacare is one of the biggest SWINDLES ever perpetrated upon the American people, and put millions of people in dire danger of having NO usable health insurance when they sorely needed it. Nancy Peelosi summed up the swindle when she infamously said, “We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it.” Since when do we have to pass such major bills into law without knowing what's in it? Obamacare was passed into law in the “dead of night,” and sprung on us without warning. If it were so good, why did they need to make buying it MANDATORY? And FINE us if we refused? The answer is, it ISN'T, and they knew it, which is why they FORCED us to buy it, or pay a stiff fine. The perpetrators of this swindle say the Republican substitute is a scam, and will take millions of people off the health care insurance rolls. What WILL happen is millions of people who want no part of Obamacare, or any other brand of government-run health care will not sign up, and will do something else. They're frightened that we will destroy their swindle, so they try to convince the country that the American Health Care Program is worse than theirs was. The truth is, their scheme is falling apart as we sit here, so it won't be around long, anyway. (Just common sense)

Liberals Lie Again

On CNN, an infobabe said categorically that when Reagan lowered the tax rate significantly, that this action caused the national debt to rise “out of control.” Which is an out-and-out LIE. After he lowered the tax rate, the tax income INCREASED and almost DOUBLED! It created the longest lasting BOOM in the country's history! There's a simple reason for that, which the liberals either can't or WON'T understand. When you let people keep more money, especially “the rich,” they USE that money. They don't put it in deep, dark vaults where it's never seen again. They INVEST in job-creating projects, and that causes unemployment numbers to go down while causing the creation of NEW WEALTH to increase, as well.  More people have jobs, make more money, and thus SPEND more--and pay more in taxes.And that causes there to be new tax money to be paid. (Just common sense)

Truth About Sheriff Joe

Sheriff Joe Arpaio is guilty of NOTHING except doing the job he was elected to do, for the first time, 22 years ago. He was a “hard man” when it came to lawbreakers, but “an old softie” when it came to abused animals. He even had a program in his jail to pair up prisoners with dogs he took from “shelters” that “executed” them after only a couple days in captivity. One prisoner was heard to pray: “Lord help me to be the man my dog thinks I am.” He and Obama were deadly enemies because Obama was the kind of lawbreaker he usually has in his jail, not sitting in the White House making people's lives miserable. Obama got in the last word by filing misdemeanor charges against him, days before his latest election, causing him to lose. Joe will “beat those charges” because they're based on nothing. But his career is ruined, because of Obama's slimy tactics. Maybe he can get elected again, next time. (iPatriot)

CNN "Tripping Out"

They reported that Sean Hannity pointed a gun as liberal Fox News contributor Juan Williams after another political argument. That he even turned on the laser sight, putting a red dot on Williams. The story was completely false. Hannity SHOWED Williams an UNLOADED gun, and no laser sight was ever turned on. It was NOT the result of an argument. Hannity was simply SHOWING Williams the gun to emphasize a point. All safety conditions were recognized, and Williams himself disputes the veracity of the story. “At no time did I feel threatened, and I and Sean remain good friends.” CNN seems to be in the throes of beginning a mental breakdown, their “fake news” becoming more and more evident and silly. This article suggests they accept the offer of a tabloid publisher, since they're DIRECT competitors in the same market. (Breitbart)

Same Ol' Same Ol'

I said this scam wouldn't work on Trump, but it looks like it has. He appears to have “caved” on his wish for a billion dollars for his “wall” to keep a “government shutdown” from happening. That's too bad. They finally found something that seems to be working against Trump in this scam, so you can bet it will happen again and again. It's hard to say how they always manage to blame the Republicans when this happens, but they do, even though it's the Democrats refusing to cooperate on ANYTHING Trump wants that is the cause, if the government actually DOES :shut down,” which it never actually has. What is CALLED a shutdown by Democrats is always just something bureaucrats themselves CAUSE by refusing to pay bills and laying off a few government workers. Then they blame the Republicans, and the people buy their lies. (Just common sense)

Democrats A "Sinking Ship"

That's what Bernie Sanders thinks, anyway, and he may be right. It began sinking when it ran Hillary Clinton for president against a “powerhouse” like Donald Trump. It sank some more when it repeatedly underestimated Trump, including still being convinced she would win as late as 9 PM on election night. Now it is paddling downward with their strategy to demonize Trump and get him removed as president—a forlorn hope. One of the things that is sinking them was the Democrats “fixing” the primaries so Bernie never had a “snowball's chance in hell” of getting the nomination, although he was clearly the superior candidate (though hopefully, when other than Democrat fools got to vote, they wouldn't elect an ADMITTED socialist). Debbie Wasserman Schultz lost her job as Democrat Party chair over that, bequeathing the title to Donna Brazile, who infamously “leaked” debate questions to Hillary (She finally admitted it, the other day). They've tried everything, and lost every time. Now they're not smart enough to realize they've lost, and to start doing something to change their party so as to win, next time. Now, all they can do is lay on the floor, kick their feet, and scream while the world passes them by. They need to go to their “safe space” where they'll never know they're dead. (Patriot Tribune)

Screwed Up Again

Heads are going to roll at the Secret Service. Twice recently, a “fence jumper” has been found to be running around on the White House grounds for from fifteen to twenty minutes. The most recent one was even able to “rattle the knob” on a door, trying to get inside. When he wandered his way to the West Portico area, he was FINALLY spotted by a uniformed SS man, and he was apprehended. Of course, the SS responded with many men and women, blanketed the grounds, and found nothing. It's a good thing neither men were a serious threat, or somebody might have died. Soon, the man whose most famous saying was “You're fired”” will do his thing, and I don't know how many SS officers will survive his attack. Maybe Trump ought to get his own security people and take personal control of his security. (USA Today)

Just Like I Predicted

A woman has accused Sean Hannity of sexual harassment—without anything like proof to back it up, of course, but her unsupported word). Even if it were true, it sounds like just a guy trying to make a date. It's way too easy for a woman to DEFINE such as sexual harassment these days. Hannity immediately branded it as false, calling her a “serial harasser” who would do anything to get noticed. And it is true this woman has made many such accusations in the past. She recanted within two hours. I expect this to be only the first of many false reports on Hannity. I look for other women to “pile on,” as they usually do when somebody accuses somebody of sexual harassment. That's all part of the scam. None have any proof, but they accuse, anyway, hoping the celebrity will pay them off. Of course, the liberal media jumped right on it. (Daily Wire)

Government Wasting Your Money

Incumbent politicians seem to think it's a crime for anybody to suggest that they could do with less money. But frankly, they WASTE more money than we could ever take away from them by legislation. And when it is found out, they just shrug their shoulders, saying,”That's life,” and go right on wasting as much as they can on their various give away projects. One such as the current runaway rail project in Hawaii that is costing TEN BILLION DOLLARS that they say is “Too far along to stop now.” Current politicians wanted to cut four miles off their projected construction schedule to save money. The project was touted as “reducing traffic problems,” but, if completed as designed, would only reduce traffic ONE PERCENT. Then we have the “Bridge to Nowhere” in Alaska, and the “Big Dig” in Boston. All boondoggles. (Just common sense)

Disarming America

That seems to be the goal of the anti-gun fools. Every law, every regulation they propose, make Americans defenseless against the millions of ILLEGAL gun already out there in the hands of all kinds of “bad guys,” none of which wish us well. I don't know how they figure that will stop gun violence. You CAN'T stop criminals from getting guns. They usually don't get their guns legally, anyway. But every law the anti-gun fools promote make honest people defenseless, while doing NOTHING to hinder the getting of, and the use of guns by the “bad guys.” In fact, their laws make it easier for them to victimize honest, law-abiding people. Gun-free zones, for example. The theory is that, if people aren't allowed, by law, to bring their guns there, that will solve the problem. But the “bad guys” don't OBEY laws, leaving law-abiding people defenseless against them. Gun safes, trigger locks, and all the other devices they force us to use, likewise. They make it impossible to get the guns we do have in operation fast enough to effectively oppose a “bad guy,” who doesn't follow the rules. By so doing, they simply get people killed, while doing NOTHING to “stem gun violence." You'd think they'd learn that, but apparently they don't have sufficient intelligence to do so. (Just common sense)

AP Hiding the Truth

I'm getting very tired of the liberal media trying to hide the truth about Islamic terrorists. I don't know what their motivation is, and I don't care. When a black racist who shouted “Allahu Akbar!” when he killed three random white people on the street, the Associated Press “edited” his shouts to “God is great,” rather than the true words, “Allahu Akbar!” which means the same thing, but reveals his allegiance to Islam. It is that allegiance they want to hide. I don't know if they really WANT the Islamic terrorists to win, or not. But still their attempts to “erase” the Islamic terrorism connection is reprehensible. The bad thing is that this tendency to HIDE all references to Islam is not limited to AP. It runs all the way through the liberal media's handling of reporting on terrorist attacks, attempting to HIDE all references to Islamic terrorism. That will be the death of us if it continues. (Daily Caller)

What Do doctors Know?

Yeah, I know. Doctors are, for the most part, smart fellas--in their specialized fields. But they, as a group, know NOTHING about guns, so why would anybody accept their pronouncements about them? They're now saying, “Automatic weapons belong on the battlefield, and ONLY on the battlefield.” Next, they'll be echoing those judges who said automatic weapons are NOT guns, and are not protected under the Second Amendment. These are generalizations, and the generalizations don't work. What if an Islamic terrorists or just a criminal or crazy comes at you with a fully automatic weapon? Without your own, you wouldn't stand a chance. And that's not something that will never happen, the way things are going today. With Islamic terrorists flooding into this country, disguised as “refugees,” the RAPE figures are going steadily up, as are the murder rates, although nobody has yet seen fit to connect that with the entry of Islamic terrorists into the country. The whole idea that you can defend yourself by DISARMING yourself is absurd. (New Haven Register-News)

Violates First Amendment

That's what they say about making laws barring doctors from asking you about guns. Next, they'll make laws FORCING you to answer truthfully about your guns, or face action for lying under oath. And they'll put you in jail for refusing to answer. But for now, if your doctor asks you about your guns, just tell him (her) it's “nonaya business.” He may have a First Amendment right to ask you, but any effort to DEMAND an answer violates the Fourth Amendment. For my part, I don't care what kind of laws they make, my answer will still be the same if my doctor asks about my guns. It's not his business to ask, and it has nothing to do with my health. The government is getting way too far into my personal business, and I'm not going to allow it. So they can jail me if they can. (Daily Caller)

It's Firin' Time

In Texas, a few Obama holdovers in the Border Patrol ordered a 40 mile stretch of the border to be unpatrolled. They actually DID it. And put it on paper! The way to take care of the attempted undermining of Trump is to GET RID OF those doing it. Some can't be easily found. This bunch is so brazen they actually put their contrary order on paper! I think they knew their time was coming to an end, and wanted to “go out with a bang.” Trump probably didn't have them specifically targeted, but I'd bet the farm he does, now. These fools are not long for this job. One anonymous Border Control agent said, “The drug cartels exploit out weaknesses, and they will certainly exploit this one.” Maybe that's the purpose of this order. The guy giving it may be in cahoots with the cartel, and WANT to create a weakness for them to exploit. (Liberty Headlines)

Determined to Be Stupid

Chicago's top cop, who should know better, opposes a law now under consideration to apply longer sentences” for criminals who use guns in the commission of a crime. You'd think that would be a “slam dunk, wouldn't you? Because it puts the onus squarely on the shoulders of the lawbreaker, not the law abiding citizen, as most anti-gun laws do. He seems to think it's just another way to put black men in prison. Maybe so. But if black men use guns in a crime, they DESERVE it. In Chicago in 2016, 4,378 people were shot, resulting in 717 dead. Most of them black men shot by black men, except for the black women shot by black men, and a few white men and women. That means somebody was shot every two minutes, with somebody killed every 12 minutes. Most of them black men killing black men. And he thinks this is just an effort to send more black men to prison? “If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.” That's a well-known saying, and it's true. (Bearing Arms)