Purposely Creating A Problem

Obama is purposely creating problems for future people by importing as many Muslims as he can. If he thinks importing so many Muslims all at once will not create problems for Americans, he needs his head examined—again. And that's not racism or religious intolerance. It's common sense. Fully HALF the refugees admitted to the United States recently are Muslims. Down from previous numbers, since they must have “tumbled” to the fact we KNOW they're importing many more Muslims than Christians. That number used to be 1500 Muslims to 1 Christian. But even so, Muslims are brought up in a completely different fashion than are Americans, and even the “peaceful Muslims” HATE how we live, and want to change it. And they liberally use our laws to sue people to get their way. One thing they're trying is to make ANY criticism of Islam a crime. And they work HARD to CREATE situations in which they can sue, while liberal judges give them huge “settlements” for objecting to NORMAL American behavior. Of course, we hate some of the things they do, too. Like the way they treat their women, and fathers and brothers killing Muslim girls (“honor killings”) for loving the wrong man, and their propensity to rape women and little boys, which is undeniable, considering the sharp increase in rape of both wherever they go. (MRC TV)

CNN Ignorant About Guns

They say that, since N. Carolina is an “open carry state,” Kieth Lamont Scott was within his rights to be carrying a gun. That shows complete ignorance on how laws work. Scott was a “violent felon,” and thus was BARRED the ownership and use of a gun—period. When the cops saw him holding a gun in his car, he became a “prime target” for arrest. What happened then is in question, but that lie alone, makes all other statements about the case suspect. His wife says he “never owned a gun.” But she has, in the past, taken out a restraining order on him because he “threatened her with a gun.” This shows sure knowledge of her LIE to police. He actually spent 7 years in PRISON on a gun charge. How she expected to support that lie is a mystery. This is how people “whip up” controversy whenever the cops have to shoot a suspect. As in Ferguson, MO, the entire contretemps was CAUSED by the LIE that Brown had his hands up, saying, “don't shoot.” In Baltimore, the lie that was disproved was that the cop driving the police “wagon” gave the suspect a “wild ride,” thus killing him. That was disproved by video evidence, and all six cops charged were exonerated. (The Federalist)

"Trickle-Down Economics"

That's the disparaging and insulting name liberals use to describe the free market, which has been responsible for ALL the advances we have seen in the economy since this country was founded. They call it that because we maintain that if the “rich” get to keep more of their money, they'll use it to fund projects that create jobs and profits for EVERYBODY. Thus, the “trickle-down” effect they hate so much. There's only one problem there. It WORKS. It's the reason this country has been the “destination of choice” for everybody, from all over the world, who want to better themselves. They KNOW they can do it, here, no matter how much the liberals deny it. Liberals talk about “creating jobs,” but they can't. All they can do is get out of the way so the free market can create ALL the jobs. Politicians only create GOVERNMENT jobs, with the tax money they extort from the private businesses. (Just common sense)

She's A Child Actor

Remember that 16-year-old “random audience member” girl who asked Hillary about why women should be judged on their body image? She's NOT a “random audience member.” She's a child actor who was probably HIRED to act a part, and who (unlike other questioners) used a cue card to ask her question. She's the daughter of a Democrat State Senator and campaign worker from Pennsylvania. It's also instructive to note that, sitting right next to her was Chelsea Clinton, Hillary's daughter. This is a typical Democrat political setup, designed to fool the electorate. They really think we're stupid, don't they? This is such a thin scam that I'm surprised they even tried it. Except that they probably thought the “hoi palloi” was too stupid to see through it. (Patriot Post)

Racist Roots of Gun Control

I'll bet you didn't know that the first “gun control laws” in America were made to keep guns out of the hands of Indians—and predictably didn't work. The Indians still got the guns they used to victimize all whites. Soon the laws were widened (as they always are) to include blacks and mulattoes (anybody with a single “drop” of black blood). So the first anti-gun laws were MADE to keep guns away from Indians and black people. And, if they thought they could get away with it, they'd do the same, today. They may not be WRITTEN that way, but in many places, they're interpreted that way. At the same time, the reason so many black males die by cop's guns is that they are SHOOTING at cops, at the time. Not always, but mostly. Of course, they'll call me racist for pointing out this truth, but I don't give a damn. Lately, they've attributed ANYTHING they don't like to racism. Even if they have to change the meaning of certain words they CALL “code words.” (Time Magazine)

More Black Males Die

Data from the Centers for Disease Control (not the most reliable source) indicates that of all the black males between the ages of 15 and 24 who died in 20154, a MAJORITY were killed by a gun. What the “study” didn't say is that most of those young black males were gang members, and were killed by other black male gang members, using ILLEGAL guns. Something all their “gun laws” would have NO control over. This is how they force their false narrative on us. By leaving out the most important things. This proves NOTHING except for the fact that young white men are smarter than young black men, and usually don't join gangs. Of course, they'll call me a racist (again) for pointing out this truth. In Chicago, the chance of a young black man getting shot in the worst neighborhoods (which are predominantly black) is nine times greater than in the safest neighborhood (which is usually predominantly white). Chicago is run by Democrats and has some of the tightest gun-control laws in the nation, coupled with the highest gun death rate. Does that tell you anything? (The Trace)

"World Withut Guns"

'One imbecile made a film titled, “I Want to Live In A World With NO Guns,” and another has invited the maker to the White House. Why not? That's a good place for imbeciles to gather. People who actually believe that if laws were made to outlaw guns, that would make guns disappear from the world, and those who believe that one degree rise in temperature over one hundred years is a “national emergency," and that man could actually cause it, probably think they can put toothpaste back in the tube, too. This guy not only wants all guns gone, he wants the cops to be gone, too. Which signals to me he is a “budding criminal” who wants to victimize people without being bothered by the cops. Obama has signaled his own criminal tendencies by “honoring” this fool! If all guns were actually gone, including the ones normally held by the cops, he and his friends could “run wild” and victimize others at will. Such pipe dreams are the “stuff of legends” among liberals, who aren't too well supplied in the brain department. There are some real damned fools in this world, and one of them is sitting in the White House. (Breitbart)

Making the Cops Nervous

The “Black Lives Matter” fools CLAIM they're protesting cop shooting black men way too often while CREATING an atmosphere where cops will be very nervous any time they are out in public. Which will tend to make them “trigger happy.” when you know a black man is liable to just walk up and shoot you while you're doing nothing but your daily activities, such as fueling your car, you're BOUND to be “quick on the trigger,” in self defense. They're CREATING the very situation they CLAIM to be protesting. \Witness: all the cops who have been killed from ambush while innocently sitting in their well-marked patrol cars, of putting gas in it, They CLAIM that cops go out each day on a “hunting trip,” LOOKING for blacks to kill.

Meanwhile, black men DO go out HUNTING cops to kill. That's a proven fact, illustrated by the blue body count. Every time a cop kills a black man they immediately raise a crowd to riot, whether or not it's a “good shoot.” Thugs come from all over the country (as in Charlotte, NC, where 70% of those arrested in their riot were from out of state) It's like they have a “phone tree” that allows them to IMMEDIATELY whip up a crowd of rioters. This is doing nothing except to get more cops, and even MORE back men killed. There were TWO shootings involving cops in Denver this morning, and already there is a crowd of “protesters” lined up against the cops, and we don't even know if they were “good shoots,” or not. And when we find out, they won't believe it. (Just common sense)

Mall Killer Barred Guns

The anti-gun fools all want to pass more and more laws to “keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them,” in spite of the fact that such laws DON'T WORK, and have NEVER worked. The killer of FIVE people at the Cascade Mall in Burlingtton, WA, was specifically BARRED from gun ownership, due to past felonies and his emotional and mental health issues—but, somehow, he still GOT the gun he used in killing FIVE innocent people. How do they answer that? They don't. They just ignore it, and go on whining for more, tighter gun laws that never work. Anti-gun fools never admit their “solutions” don't work. They just keep on insisting on making more of them, in spite of the constitutional prohibition against their laws. Of course, the “big story” in this article is the fact that a cancer survivor is one of the victims, and nothing is said about the fact the killer was barred from having a gun. (Seattle Times)

Suicide By Cop

You're a cop. You've had a very busy day. You drive up on a “suspicious person” call and a man refuses to take his hands out of his pockets. Then he takes his hands out of his pocket and assumes a shooting stance similar to the one assumed by the cop in from of him, and holding what LOOKS like a gun, and “aims” it at you. Do you shoot?. Absolutely! You don't want to die, today. Immediately, a crowd forms. Like Muslims, the local hoods and thugs must have a “phone tree” that lets them build an “instant crowd” to riot over ANY police shooting. They insist that the victim was unarmed, and he was. But he ACTED like he was armed, and wanted tio kill some cops. You can't depend on the conclusions of “Monday morning quarterbacks” in a life or death situation. You just act. It didn't matter that he was unarmed. He wanted the cops to THINK he was, so they'd shoot him. It's as clear a case of “suicide by cop” as I've ever seen. You can't stop and consider his mental state in a situation like this. Not if you want to stay alive, that is. (Mail News)

Hillary "Not Selling Guns!"

One of the factors that distresses Obama the most is the fact that every time he talks again about his intention to “stomp on” America's constitutionally-protected right to self defense, and to own and use the means to that end, a gun, America buys more and more guns. Consequentially, he has been unwittingly responsible for more gun sales than any gun salesman out there. But conversely, Hillary has never been responsible for an increase in gun sales, no matter how much she talks about doing the same. There's a good reason for that: Obama IS president, has shown clearly that he is DETERMINED to step on our self defense and gun ownership rights, in spite of what the Constitution says. Hillary, on the other hand, is merely a presidential hopeful that intelligent people believe will never get to walk into the Oval Office again, not even as a visitor. Therefore, they need not worry about her supposed future ability to affect their self defense rights. We can only hope we can continue to stifle Obama's ability to violate our rights until he is forced to leave office on January 20, 1917. (Washington Post)

Always Democrat Controlled

Have you noticed that ALL the cities that are in “big trouble” financially are controlled by Democrats? That every one suffering from riots and looting in the name of “fighting police violence” are run by Democrats? Or that all the problems in the federal government have been CAUSED by Democrats? Democrats have been “in control” of most facets of our society for 50 or more years, no matter who holds the office of president. Some Republican presidents are able to beat them, but others suffer from the subversion of the many Democrat-appointed bureaucrats, and liberal members of the academic community. The ugly truth is, the Democrats are INCOMPETENT to govern this country, or any part of it. But they fool the public into “not noticing” that, by lying about their “accomplishments,” as Obama does daily. He says the economy is “fine,” while intelligent people who pay attention know that's a LIE. He talks about the “improvement in unemployment” under him, while MILLIONS of people have GIVEN UP on ever finding another job and have left the work force, allowing him to PRETEND unemployment numbers are “going down,” by no longer counting them. (Just common sense)

Punishing the Hero

One of the firefighters was the hero of the Townville shooting. Being close by, he (and his chief) arrived before deputies, and “took down” the shooter, who had already killed one, and wounded several others. He was armed, but it hasn't been said whether or not he used that gun in his “take down.” Even so, he saved many lives, not to mention his own chief's life. Now, according to the sheriff, he faces FIVE YEARS in the slammer if charges are filed against him for having that gun, notwithstanding the fact that having and using a gun is a constitutional right. They have laws (however unconstitutional) against private citizens being armed there, and he could easily be charged, and give up five years of his life after his heroic actions. This is the world we live in, folks! Stupid laws, made by stupid politicians, that make it a lot easier for CRIMINALS to victimize us with their ILLEGAL, unregistered guns. (WYFF News 4)

Ban Guns, No More Violence!

Haw, haw! Giggle, giggle! Thanks. I needed a good belly laugh. That's the fanciful theory of the anti-gun fools, anyway. That's why I call them fools. Their entire campaign is based on “pipe dreams.” It's a pipe dream to suppose that the only violence in the land is done by a gun. Knives are already at the top of the list for instruments of violence, but efforts to ban them are tepid and useless. As are efforts to deny us our constitutional right to own and use a gun for self defense. They can't just BAN guns altogether, so they “dance around” the constitutional prohibition on banning guns by making laws that make them impossible to get into action fast enough to be useful. Therefore, making them USELESS in the face of a criminal, wielding an ILLEGAL gun, who isn't bothered by such “rules.” He neither registers his guns, nor does he obey ANY laws regarding gun ownership and handling. This is the flaw in the thinking of the anti-gun fools. (Guns)

Here We Go Again!

Cops killed a “young teenager” in the LA area,”shooting him in the back.” He was “unarmed,” and he was “running away with his hands up.” Yeah, right! Cops found guns on the scene. I wonder who was carrying them? And I seriously doubt he was “running away with his hands in the air,” crying, “I'm unarmed!” Of course, nobody talks about the stolen car he was riding in with his friend, and the possibility that he was a street gang member, and was trying to kill those cops. They emphasize his youth, and the fiction that he was “running away,” and “unarmed.” That's a pattern with the “Black Lives Matter" fools. Lie, lie, lie, and twist the truth. And even when the lie is PROVED, insist on TELLING the lie, again and again. Facts don't seem to matter to them. They do everything they can to obfuscate the facts and make the cops “the bad guys.” All they want is for the cops to “go away” and leave the field to them and the rest of the thugs. So they can loot and burn, and steal people's belongings without interference. (The Truth About Guns)

Punishing the Hero

One of the firefighters was the hero of the Townville shooting. Being close by, he (and his chief) arrived before deputies, and “took down” the shooter, who had already killed one, and wounded several others. He was armed, but it hasn't been said whether or not he used that gun in his “take down.” Even so, he saved many lives, not to mention his own chief's life. Now, according to the sheriff, he faces FIVE YEARS in the slammer if charges are filed against him for having that gun, notwithstanding the fact that having and using a gun is a constitutional right. They have laws (however unconstitutional) against private citizens being armed there, and he could easily be charged, and give up five years of his life after his heroic actions. This is the world we live in, folks! Stupid laws, made by stupid politicians, that make it a lot easier for CRIMINALS to victimize us with their ILLEGAL, unregistered guns. (WYFF News 4)

"B-B-But, This Never Happens!"

It doesn't, huh? That's what the anti-gun fools always say, completely ignoring the thousands of times it DOES happen every year, to support their false narrative. Maybe if they asked these 3 “bad guys” they might find out it really does. Oh. I forgot. One of them is dead, and the other two are still hunting the “high timber.” as far away from this woman as possible. If they ever find them where they're hiding, maybe they can ask them. This should happen more often. It might convince some of these fools that think they can just TAKE what they want, brandishing their ILLEGAL guns, that theirs is a very dangerous profession and maybe they ought to find a new one. The article doesn't say if any charges will be taken against this gutsy woman, but if there are, it will be a travesty. She has a right to defend herself against three ARMED criminals entering her home. (The Blaze)

"Falling Out Among Criminals"

Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has come out and said what all intelligent people already knew. That her “buddy” (former buddy, anyway) “rushed to judgment” in charging those six cops in the death of Freddie Gray, who accidentally killed HIMSELF in an effort to incriminate the cops. Marilyn Mosby, the prosecutor, DID “rush to judgment,” but fortunately, “wiser heads prevailed,” and all six cops were exonerated. Mosby, undaunted by her failure, has pledged to “go after the cops” in Baltimore. Rawlings-Blake says there “is no way to 'fix' race relations in America.” Actually, there is. You ,might stop lying to make it seem worse than it has ever been. Baltimore was a “seminal moment” in the “war on cops,” which Mosby seems bent on continuing. She is an obvious cop-hater, even though she CLAIMS she is not, since several of her family are cops. This whole thing has become a “political football” in Baltimore. Nothing is said about what has happened to the six cops she accused except that they still face “departmental review” of the incident, where they can be pilloried on the basis of somebody's OPINION, not on guilt or innocence. If this incident signals the end of Rawlings-Blake's political career, that can only be a good thing. If that also includes Mosby, so much the better. (Baltimore Sun)

Soros Bloomberg Are Mad!

Well, boo-hoo! The Rocky Mountain Gun Owners tell us that George Soros, who recently joined with Michael Bloomberg, both billionaire rabble-rousers and anti-gun fools, are MAD at Colorado because their efforts to “stomp out” our gun rights is in trouble. Well, I'll be happy to help them wring out their crying towels, but that's all. Who the hell CARES if they're “mad at us?” We're mad at THEM for meddling in our affairs! Whatever gives them the idea they have the right to interfere in our state's business, especially to violate the Constitution in any way they can, is a mystery. They know we are GUARANTEED the right to self defense, and to own and carry the means to that end, a gun, but they are still determined to “stomp it out.” It's too bad the Founders didn't prescribe a punishment for people who try very hard to violate it. (just common sense)

When's A Protest Not A Protest?

Attorney General Lynch (an appropriate name, that) said the rioters in Charlotte are “practicing a basic right.” But I disagree. It's not a “protest” OR a “basic right” when they steal and loot cash from businesses; It's not a “protest” then they shoot each other over minor disagreements; attack newspeople and try to burn them to death; throw rocks off bridges at cars containing innocent people; beat up innocent people because they're white; trashing their own neighborhood; attempting to hijack cars so they can victimize innocent people. These are not the actions of protesters.” They are the actions of CRIMINALS, taking advantage of the unrest other criminals have created, in this case, “Black Lives Matter” criminals. This black against white racism being demonstrated in these riots is repugnant to intelligent people, and is acceptable only to fools. (Zero Hedge)