Another Reason

There are plenty of reasons NOT to vote for Hillary. Enough to guarantee her a losing campaign if all the voters were paying attention to politics. But since a bunch of them are NOT, she's getting away with things that would have long since ruined a candidate's chances of EVER being elected to ANY office in the land. Now she's talking about forcing Americans to “bend to her will” and change their religious faith. Now that's something even the “no pay attentioners” will notice. And when they do, they're going to “turn away” so quickly they may hurt themselves. What a stupid bi....er, uh, witch she is! If she thinks she's going to get away with that in this country, she's got a BIG other think coming. American colonists CAME HERE to escape religious persecution, and they aren't going to stand for it from her. She'll be lucky if she doesn't get tarred and feathered and run out of DC on a rail! Boy, talk about an arrogant old bag! (Just common sense)

Obvious Double Standard

The liberal media bashed Bush because he didn't “jump up” and immediately get on a plane to New Orleans after their massive hurricane. But they're completely silent on Obama continuing his golf games (plural) after the massive flooding in the same area. They say it's because he's “too busy” (playing golf, I guess) to bother about thousands of people losing their homes, and some losing their lives. But he's a Democrat, so who cares? After Trump “called him out,” he put his golf clubs away (for a while) and thought about going down there. Now he says his going down there would create too much of a hassle for them, at a bad time. Funny, that's what Bush said, and he poo-pooed that. I think he just doesn't care and is mad because it broke up his golf game. Too bad. He's still president (for a while, yet) and has a responsibility to DO SOMETHING about it. So he'd better get to work. (News Busters)

They Hate Guns

And they hate hunting. But they still eat meat. They don't even recognize the connection between the living animals we kill to support their wish to EAT meat. I guess they somehow think meat just magically appears in their grocery stores. They don't even think about such things as a cow being herded into a small enclosure and hit in the head with a sledge hammer to kill it, so they can cut it up to make meat for their tables. And this being done thousands of times a day, all over the world, so they can be fed. People like that should be vegetarians, but don't ask them to do so. All their ideas are based on an erroneous premise. They think HUNTERS are the only ones who KILL animals, and forget the people who kill animals by the thousands to feed their appetites. (New Jovian Thunderbolt)

Stage-Managing Elian

Remember Elian Gonzales, the six-year-old child that was retrieved at the point of an automatic weapon held by a member of the Border Patrol while hiding in a closet held by an uncle? The child who almost DIED while trying to escape Cuba with his mother, who DID die? Remember that tear-jerking TV interview with his “grieving father?” That was completely stage-managed while the frightened father, who was closely watched by Cuban “security,” answered the questions provided by his (US government-hired) “attorney.” Makes you wonder what would have happened if he'd have given “answers” they didn't like? Elian is a man now, and is completely brainwashed by the Cubans. All this was completely staged, not by the Cubans (although it was with their connivance), but by agents of then President Bill Clinton, who wanted the world to think it was just a “family” thing. Funny—I wonder who paid so a man who worked for about $12 a DAY in Cuba could afford to come to America for this “interview?” And why it was necessary for him to be closely guarded by Cuban “security?” (Thugs, if you ask me!) This whole thing was set up to cover up the ATROCITY of sending this child, who had ESCAPED Castro's “island prison” back to be brainwashed and made into a communist puppet. (The Blaze)

Gun Laws Never Work

The big problem with “gun laws” as we know them is that they don't work. They're a USELESS waste of time, money, and lives. Yes. LIVES. They get people killed, by making law-abiding people DEFENSELESS against those people who ignore them, and they are legion. Criminals, who simply want what's yours without working for it, and are willing to KILL you to get it, to “crazies,” who get their kicks from killing people in bunches, to Islamic terrorists, who want to kill you because you don't subscribe to their “religion.” All these are the best reason I can think of for law-abiding people to own and use guns, which are the BEST tool for self defense against their ILLEGAL guns. But the anti-gun fools don't agree—for us. Many of them run around behind a WALL of armed “security” while attempting to deny us the same right, even though the Constitution GUARANTEES us that right. They can't just BAN guns, so they do everything they can to make the ones we have USELESS, or deny us the right to carry our guns everywhere, while lawbreakers IGNORE that. Result? We get killed. (Indy Star).

Gun-Free Zones

They just don't work. They're an “open invitation” to the damned fools who want to come in and shoot the place up. Panera Bread is such a place. They have declared all 1,800 of their locations to be “gun-free.” Which didn't stop this guy from bringing his gun into one of their stores. And that didn't do much good for two cops who came there in response to a “suspicious person” report. He shot them both dead, between bites. He killed one in the store, and killed another when he was found hiding a short distance away, later. Two other deputies who came later shot HIM to death. I've said, many times, that “no gun zones” are a stupid idea. They do NOTHING to stop people from bringing guns in, and only get people killed. This story is a good illustration of that. Two cops are dead because of that “no-gun zone.” People who are bent on evil-doing don't bother to obey such restrictions. Only the law-abiding do, and they are not the problem. But politicians are too STUPID to realize that, and so, apparently, are the “top brass” at Panera Bread, a place I will never again enter. (Guns 'n' Freedom)

Buying the BS

49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick is refusing to stand while the National Anthem is played before a game. Okay,Colin, you don't HAVE TO strand. Nor do you have to stand from your position on the bench to play the game either, therefore not getting a chance to show what talent you may have and improve your position in the game. Yes, you're not required to stand. You can proclaim your RACISM all you want while people judge you on it. We can see you've “bought the horse manure” put out by the “Black Lives Matter” fools, who are creating the very atmosphere they CLAIM they're protesting. They SAY that cops kill an undue number of black males

 Then they “prove it” by taking every instance where a black man is shot by police, whether a “good shoot” or not, and play it up in the liberal media, causing riots and death and property damage. Like they did in Ferguson, Mo, where a giant thug who was intimidating everybody else thought he could intimidate a cop, and he couldn't. That whole “hands up, don't shoot” thing was a bunch of crap! He was busily engaged in taking that cop's gun away from him to kill HIM with it when he was shot. Then they ignore the WHITE people killed by black and white cops who are doing their jobs. Yes, there ARE exceptions. But when you pin a target on a cop's back (or chest, as it were) they get very nervous and BEGIN shooting first and never asking questions later. They have CREATED the very atmosphere they CLAIM they're protesting. (Newser)

Releasing Gun Violators

If I didn't know Obama wanted to INCREASE crime generally, and gun crime specifically, so he can make even more restrictive gun laws that make our guns USELESS in the face of the MILLIONS of ILLEGAL guns held by criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists he is importing by the hundreds of thousands, I would wonder about his sanity in the things he does. He talks about “stemming gun crime,” but he releases 56 criminals CONVICTED of gun crimes, to prey on innocent people again. He imports hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists, disguised as “refugees.” People who have TOLD us they want to KILL all those who will not “bend to their will” and convert to Islam. People tell me I'm crazy for thinking we (not me) elected an ENEMY, who wants to DESTROY our country as it is, and make it into a “socialist paradise,” but if you accept the fact that he is a saboteur, his actions make perfect sense. But the people who could DO something about him refuse to see what's before their eyes, and let him get away with murder.. (Daily Caller)

Out of Control

Gun laws are “out of control.” An alligator was trying to bite off this man's leg, so he shot him. Natural, right? But NO! The local sheriff arrested him, using the “anti-poaching laws” where he lived. Now I ask you; what would YOU have done? Just let him chew your leg off? Or would you kill him in self defense, if you could? The anti-gun fools are “running wild” these days, and doing things that defy understanding. It seems like they are trying to destroy the concept of self-defense. How else was this man to defend his own life and the lives of his livestock against a huge alligator who was apparently fearless, and wouldn't go away? It's like a case I heard about where a man killed a BEAR who was attacking him and who also got arrested. What was he to do? Let the bear maul him? Damn, there are a lot of STUPID people in this world, enforcing IGNORANT laws! (Fox 13 News)

"Put "Em In Their Place!"

That's what Hillary is pushing for blacks, although she's doing it in such a way as to make it LOOK like she is IN FAVOR of black rights, while she promotes policies that “keep them in their place on the Democrat Plantation.” And she disparages Trump's wish to make blacks as equal as possible, while talking disparagingly about Trump being against felons voting, as if ALL felons were black. She talks about “the party of Lincoln now being the party of Trump,” as if that were a bad thing. The Democrats have always been the PARTY of racism. The KKK was, for a time, their “military arm” in their efforts to “kill off” as many blacks as possible. Today, she supports Planned Parenthood in their quest to kill as many BLACK babies as possible (PP was STARTED by a racist! And continues to be run by racists, who murder more BACK babies than white ones.) This is her “soft racism.” How she SUPPORTS racism while PRETENDING otherwise. (Patriot Post)

Mexico: 5 Times Higher

MEXICO: 5X HIGHER: Mexico has very strict gun control laws (which affect drug cartels, NOT), but have a gun violence problem five times higher than in America. Why is that? Could it be because tight gun laws don't work? Or maybe the drug cartels kill enough people to make up that number, rater than other Mexican citizens? In any case, this proves that Mexico, like France and Belgium, who also have very tight gun laws, coupled with high gun violence stats, prove what I've been saying, all along, that the gun laws they make today not only don't work, they make honest people DEFENSELESS against the ILLEGAL guns held by criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists. (Breitbart)

"Guns Endanger, Not Protect"

This article, by an anti-gun “researcher,” says that a gun in the house is more likely to kill or wound a family member than an intruder. What the hell is he SMOKING? If I were a druggie, I'd want some. All the “stats” he cites are horse manure, as are the conclusions he reaches. He gives a list of things that “block” any “common sense solutions,” which is just a different tune added to the same old words. He says most unwarranted gun deaths or injuries are done by LICENSED individuals, which is a DIRECT LIE if you believe REPUTABLE figures, not the phony ones cited by anti-gun fools. The entire article is a collection of horse manure, as are most articles put out by anti-gun fools. Law-abiding people do NOT commit most gun crimes, as he claims. The “studies” he cites (but does not name) have a questionable methodology, which is why he only “refers” to them, without naming them. That way, we can't check their accuracy or methodology. That's an old anti-gun fool trick. (WBUR)

Full Turnaround

Politicians used to openly make laws and teach classes to keep blacks “in their place.” Now they're openly teaching classes in schools and making law to keep WHITE people “in their place." Obama was right when he said electing him president would eliminate white against black realism. But he didn't tell us he planned to push black against WHITE racism and make it “the law.” It amazes me how politicians make EVIL seem good. It's all in how you present it. Obama is using the IMAGINED “epidemic” of cops shooting and killing black men (Ignoring the fact that they kill each other more often) to fuel hatred against whites and accuse them of the white against black racism that USED to exist, which CREATES black against white racism, and a lot of dead cops. This is one of the most EVIL things Obama has done, and that's saying a lot! It takes a lot of scheming to turn an entire nation completely around in their thinking. (Todd Starnes)

Second Amendment Misunderstood

That's what the anti-gun fools want us to think. And, in a way, they're right. The Second Amendment does NOT give us the right to be armed in self defense. It merely RECOGNIZED the basic human right of self defense, and to own and use the means to that, a gun—or whatever else we need to be on an equal basis to those who own and use ILLEGAL guns, or whatever. It recognizes that right, and pledges to defend and preserve it. It IS a “God-given right” (or for atheists, it is a “right of BIRTH”). You were BORN with that right. Only would-be dictators want to take it away from you. Them and their “useful idiots.” And another thing the Founders realized, but which today's politicians ignore is the fact that if they become too oppressive, we must have the means for defense from our own government. Think want our homeland would be if the British were successful in taking the guns of the colonists! There would never have been a “revolutionary war,” and we would still be subject to the whims of the King of England. That IS a basic right, and politicians have been trying, since before the ink was dry on the Constitution, to take it away. If we ever allow it, we're LOST. (Eagle Gun Range)

"It's Insane!"

Tom Arnold, the actor who rode his wife's skirts to an acting career, thinks it's a insane to think that owning a gun is a “God-given right.” What is this fool smoking? It's not GUNS that are a “god-given right,” it's SELF DEFENSE! And the right to own and use the means to that end, a gun, is a constitutionally-respected right. I'll bet this fool has an armed bodyguard who follows him around, as most anti-gun fools have. They think THEY have a right to self defense, but us “peasants” don't. It seems to ba a malady that affects such people, and they think they have the right to DICTATE to us, what is right or wrong. I guess they love the POWER denying us the right to self defense gives them, especially when they run around with such defense, themselves. In any case, we need to ignore what these fools say, and tell them to get back to what they (may) do best, acting (If they do). They have neither the expertise, nor the RIGHT to tell us what we can do, and what is “insane." (Breitbart)

Navy Fires On Iranians

Hooray for the Navy! You've no doubt heard about the Iranian “attack boats” that “buzzed” a Navy ship in International waters, without a real response by that ship except attempts to contact them by radio and firing off flares—for which I recommended they just keep on steaming, and if the Iran boats got run over, it was their own fault. But they DID change course to avoid them. But what you DIDN'T hear about in the liberal media was yet another provocative act in the International waters off the Arabian Gulf. This time, they finally fired warning shots across the bow of the Iranian boats, which caused them to skedaddle out of there, QUICK! They certainly didn't expect that, and probably needed clean underwear after they got out of range. Iran will probably complain about the “brutal attack” on their boats, predictably completely ignoring the provocative nature of their own actions. But if they want to go to war with us, bring it on! We'll be happy to “slap down” this pipsqueak country that thinks it's more than it is. (Conservative Tribune)

"Truth Is Lie"

“Lie is truth!” It's “1984” all over again, where they tell you lies and you must pretend it's truth. They're now telling us that Hillary, one of the biggest ENEMIES of the Second Amendment, is not elected, it would “hobble gun reform.” THEIR idea of gun reform, that is, with the Second Amendment “low-hanging fruit,” ready to fall. They make pretty speeches, designed to fool the gullible among us (those who pay no attention to politics except just before and election, then vote). She has said, several times, that she “doesn't want to take away our guns,” while she works HARD, “behind the scenes,”” to do just that. And she thinks we ALL believe her while only the gullible do. The only reason “gun control” has ANY support, at all, is because of the LIES she, and other anti-gun fools tell the gullible, and which they believe. The bad thing is that there is no “intelligence test” required in order to vote. The votes of the intelligent AND the stupid are of equal value. (Time Magazine)

"But You Can't See It!"

This “researcher” at the University of Alabama has a “credibility problem.” His “research” seems to show that concealed carriers and mass shootings are connected. Which is a FALSE finding. Legal gun carriers are NOT generally prone to mass shootings! But he says so, and when asked to see his “research,” he said “no.” Seems to me that if his “research” was real, he'd be very transparent about it. But not this guy, which proves to me there is SOMETHING in there, perhaps his METHODOLOGY, that will disprove his findings, and he doesn't want that. So he will not let people SEE his research. If he thinks he will be believed if he doesn't, he's got another think coming. Sometimes the abject STUPIDITY of some of these anti-gun fools doing “research” amazes me. Florida State University professor Gary Kleck said, “This report is no more than junk science DISGUISED as research and should never have been published in a reputable scholarly journal.” This is an example of the kind of “research” the anti-gun fools rely on. (Bearing Arms)

The Great Pretense

It only takes being able to speak and read Arabic to see through the PRETENSE that ISIS and it's ilk are not “true Islam.” They are, and this is proved by what Pope Francis said about “the most influential Muslim in the world,” Egypt's Dr. Ahmad al-Tayeb who, only five years ago, cut off all ties to the Catholic Church because then Pope Benedict has demanded better protection of Christians in the Islamic world. Pope Francis said that, after he visited with al-Tayeb, he was convinced of the real difference between real Muslims and such as ISIS. Basically, he was saying that he “bought” al Tayab's LIES. The lies of a man who broke ties with the Vatican five years ago when the previous Pope expressed a wish for better protection of Christians after a Muslim massacre in Alexandria that killed 21 people. THIS is “evidence” of “peaceful; Muslims?” Gimme a BREAK! The writer of this article speaks and reads Arabic, therefore he can hear what al-Tayeb tells fellow Muslims in Arabic, and what he tells Westerners, in English. Which supports my contention that any Korans found in the West are “sanitized” to make it LOOK like most Muslims are not extremists, even if they haven't (yet) done crimes in the NAME of Islam. (American Thinker)

Trump And Churchill

Winston Churchill was one of England's finest politicians. He did things no other British politician ever DREAMED of being able to do. He made life a lot better for the British during his terms in office. Ronald Reagan did the same thing in America. He brought the unemployment numbers down from double-digits to UNDER 4%, and created the longest-lasting economic boom, by LOWERING taxes. Something no LIBERAL politician has ever done, among other stupendous achievements. What do the two have in common? They were both vilified in the press, before, during, and after their terms in office. Politicians who will actually DO what they promise are few and far between. And we now have one in America. Donald Trump. And predictably, the liberal media hates him with a passion. They keep saying he is “unfit” to be president, which is the same thing they said about Churchill and Reagan, but both proved them wrong. And they're wrong, again. But they'll never admit it and apologize, when PROVEN wrong. They just go on, as if nothing happened, and continue to vilify them. (Daily Caller)