Saturday, May 31, 2014

Is A Law Necessary?

In Sacramento, they want to make a law requiring taxi drivers to speak English. Why? Why don’t the taxi companies require it as a condition of employment? Or do they operate like they do in Denver where all the driver needs is money to rent a cab and have a license? In Denver, the cab companies aren’t in the business of carrying passengers. They’re in the taxi rental business. They don’t care how many cabs are on the road and will put as many out there as they possibly can, even if there are too many already and drivers are going broke. There are always new drivers. They don’t care if you make any money at all. They’ve got theirs. As long as they have gullible would-be cab drivers lined up around the block to give them money to use their cabs, that’s not going to change. (Last Resistance)

"Old News! Put It Behind Us!"

That’s what Democrats are hollering desperately as the Republicans (who else?) announce the formation of yet another committee to “investigate” the Benghazi murders. Only the appointment of Trey Gowdy as committee chairman gives me hope that it will not be yet another “whitewash” of Obama. Democrats are trying HARD to push the idea this is “old news” and that we should not “beat a dead horse” in investigating this very REAL and TODAY scandal where the president himself and his then Secretary of State FACILITED the murders of our ambassador and three embassy personnel, and then of LIED about it KNOWINGLY for weeks afterward. They’re deathly afraid that Gowdy will “upset their applecart” and I’ll be surprised if Gowdy comes out of this alive. People who threaten Hillary's plans seem to end up dead. I wouldn't be surprised if that applied to Obama, too. (The Washington Examiner)

Censorship Is Coming

It used to be that you only had a “voice” if you could afford a printing press. Then came the Internet, and all it took was an affordable computer and an ISP to get your opinions out there, and tell the truth that politicians would rather you not. Dictators all over the world did their best to shut us up, and in some countries, they have. Most notably communist China, Iran, and Russia. The key to their repressing bloggers is to force them to “register” with the government, which gives the government the “right of control” over them. If they say the right thing, they leave them alone. Say the wrong thing and their “license” gets pulled and they’re out of business. Putin’s “free” Russia is the latest to join the fray, passing a law requiring bloggers to “register” before they’re “allowed” to post. Licensing bloggers mirrors our own government’s efforts to “license” gun owners and is a BIG step toward a dictatorship. (New York Times)

Friday, May 30, 2014

He Gave Plenty of Warning

This guy was under psychiatric care since age 8. Even his own parents were worried about him because of his Internet posts and tried to stop him. The cops even “looked him over” and decided he wasn’t a threat to anybody—until he murdered three women in their sleep, shot and killed three others on the street, then killed himself—all because he “couldn’t get any.” Where did he get that gun? Did anybody wonder why a guy with so many mental problems wanted a gun? Anti-gun fools will almost NATURALLY blame the gun, not the system. But I think the SYSTEM is broken. After he wrote his “manifesto” in his Facebook page, why did nobody act fast enough to stop him? The ONE limitation on the right to own and use a gun I agree with is that for real mentally deficient people, not the ones the government DEEMS mentally deficient for political reasons. How did this guy get by it? It interests me that he didn’t even try to have sex with those women he murdered in their sleep. If he was so horny, why not? Damn, what a screwed-up world we live in. (Cowboy Byte)

No War on Religion?

Think again. The fight against the Christian religion is so strong that professors at East Carolina University were expressly FORBIDDEN from “thanking God” in their speeches at graduation. What kind of damned fools do we hire to teach our young, impressionable children? Of course, right along with that, many universities invite MUSLIM Imams to give the graduation addresses to their students and create (and require attendance to) “Muslim studies” courses. On the QT, without telling their parents, most of whom are footing the bills. In addition, they forbid them FROM telling their parents. He told them, “You can’t thank God. I don’t want to get into my reasons for this.” Which is because his reasons are not logical. (Update: the ECU administration "shut him down" when they told students to ignore his instructions, citing the First Amendment)  (Campus Reform)

He Didn't Know She Was "Carrying"

So while a man was arguing with Angela Martin, 44, who was sitting in her car, he pulled out a knife and started stabbing her. Whereupon she pulled out her gun and shot him to death. The result might have been very different if she had not been a licensed gun carrier. Further proof that more guns in the hands of responsible, honest people can reduce violent crime, everywhere. At least by removing ONE attacker from the list of the living. No doubt this case will be cited by anti-gun fools on their lists of “gun violence” reports. This is the kind of case they cite, not caring that the shooting was in RESPONSE to violence. (The Blaze)

Thursday, May 29, 2014

"Too Late, Ben"

Ben Carson says “The Second Amendment is needed in case the government goes off the rails.” Too late, Ben; the unthinkable has already happened. Obama has violated the Constitution so many times the press goes, “ho hum” whenever a new instance rises. He has TRASHED the Constitution, and nobody has done anything about it. A new American Revolution is near, and he fully realizes it; that’s why he’s working so hard to eliminate our right to own and use guns in self-defense. He KNOWS the time is coming SOON when his people will be going personally to your door to remonstrate with you over what you say and do in opposition to his “policies” and he doesn’t want them to meet a gun when they do. This is the most lawless president, ever. I hope some day, somewhere, somebody who can make a difference “grows a pair” and puts a stop to him and his "policies.". (Cowboy Byte)

A World Full of Fools

Did anyone ever think a bunch of people waving an American flag would be attacked and called “racist” for waving the American flag? Well, it happened at a small school in “The People’s Republic of California.” I never thought the fools could take over an entire state, but apparently it has happened, mostly because other fools already live there and allowed it. Gia Lee (a natural reaction with a name like that) said, “What’s wrong with these people holding up American flags in Morgan Hill? Racist a—holes!” I guess because she’s been taught to hate the American flag by her own government, it’s racism for others to like it. What a real BITCH this is! No brain, big mouth. “Hey folks in Morgan Hill. You have some racist neighbors. You need to check those Tea Party a–holes,” said Al_Bondigas. “F— your American flag. Racist as f—s. I’ll always have pride with my Mexican flag but not the American one,” wrote Ivan Mora.” Good. You can take your Mexican flag with you when we deport you, you illegal alien fool! We have no use for it here. And the people waving American flags are NOT racists—YOU are. They're patriotic Americans! If you don’t like it here, why did you COME here? How STUPID are you? What kind of a damned fool calls American CITIZENS racists for flying THEIR flag? (World Net Daily)

We're "Filthy"

And Muslims are “clean and spiff,” according to a Tennessee Muslim Imam (what has HE been smoking?). But when was the last time a Christian or Jew MURDERED his pregnant wife because he didn’t approve of how she dressed? Because we engaged in some sexual practices that Muslims condemn in public, but practice in private? How many six-year-old BOYS did Christians RAPE because he said something hey didn’t like? You, we’re “filthy,” aren’t we? How many 13-year-old girls have had to run away from Christian homes to escape “arranged marriages” with older men? They really like to throw around such terms as “filthy” to describe us, while their ACTIONS make them the FILTHIEST religion around. Hillary called Islam a “great religion,” but she’s a fool. (Creeping Sharia)

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Tea Party "Dead?"

“The Tea Party still rules in Texas. In an otherwise humbling election year for tea party challengers across the U.S., conservative insurgents in the Lone Star State keep winning like it’s 2012. None were bigger than fiery conservative talk radio host Dan Patrick, the Tea Party Caucus founder in the Texas Legislature, ousting longtime Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst in a symbolic signal of GOP restlessness. Anti-establishment Republicans also were favored in key statehouse runoffs, leaving Republicans poised to push Texas even further right on abortion, gun rights and spending come 2015.” What? I thought the tea Party was dead. I even heard Sean Hannity say so on the radio. Looks like reports of its death are a little premature. But then, most of the reports come from liberal sources, and you know what that’s worth. (The Blaze)

It's happening Here, Folks!

A thirteen-year-old Muslim California girl fled her home to avoid an “arranged marriage” to an unknown Pakistani man in Pakistan. She was found in a motel very close by with a relative and her parents are under investigation for child abuse in the “arranged marriage” scheme, which they deny. She and all their other children have been removed by child services pending the investigation. They say, “Yes, we were planning on a trip to Pakistan and she was excited about it.” Funny way to show her excitement, huh? Sometimes you can’t escape these foolish ways even by coming to the United States. I’d be watching her father for terrorist connections, if I were California authorities. Now they'll probably want to kill her for "dishonoring" her family. Watch out for that. (Reuters)

Polar Bears Threatened

According to Dr. Susan J. Crockford, an “evolutionary scientist” in British Columbia, who has studied Polar bears for 35 years. (How one person could have studied them for so long and NOT know that more ice doesn’t bother them in the least, I don’t know). Except maybe that she is a “climate change” fanatic, and wants to promote the idea that the Polar bears are in danger when they’re NOT. Scientists lying to promote AlGore’s swindle are not new. Some have even admitted it. But Polar bears can swim for hundreds of miles. They’ve been living there for more years than any of us have been alive, and are THRIVING. But people like Crockford want to keep that from us to keep the “global warming” money coming in. (CNS News)

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Judge-Ruled Society

John Conyers failed to get enough signatures on his petition to run for yet another term in Congress. That’s the law. He was OUT. Uh, not so fast. He’s got a friendly judge who can go AGAINST the law and keep him in office (at least let him run), one he has held for 52 years. Which just shows you how much power judges have in this country. They go against the law in their rulings all the time, but their rulings get enforced, anyway. Supreme Court Justices “rule” CONTRARY to the Constitution and THEY get upheld. We need to make some laws to force judges to follow the LAW in their rulings or be removed from the bench and, in some cases, imprisoned or even executed (as in the ruling that allowed the MURDER of countless innocent infants). (Rush Limbaugh)

Taking Out Another Republican

Looks like they’re after one more Republican-owned seat in Congress. They’re trumping up charges based on his running of a restaurant just after he left the FBI. I don’t know how true these charges are, but the timing looks very suspicious to me. He’s fighting these accusations while trying to get re-elected. I wonder  why they came up just at this time? Are they trying to “equalize” the effect of the charges against Elija Cummings for his obstruction of Congress to protect Obama’s IRS thug, Lois Lerner? Or did they already have this scam “on the table?” I can’t believe they’re really so concerned over how much he paid his employees. But then, that’s me. I don’t trust ANYTHING Democrats do. (Hot Air)

Rush Is Really Mad

About the Marxist-inspired book, “Capital,” by Thomas Pickenny that advocates collectivist (communist, socialist) principles as the best way to go. And I don’t blame him. But freedom of speech allows people to write STUPID books, too. “In the book, Piketty argues that pervasive inequality is the natural end of capitalism, with the wealthy growing wealthier as the rate of return on their assets outpaces overall economic growth. With the rich getting richer to the detriment of everyone else, Piketty proposes (i) taxing incomes on the highest earners at 80% rate, and (ii) levying an annual progressive global wealth tax.” What he’s preaching is THEFT from those who earned it for the benefit of the “drones” of society and that’s the BASIS of collectivism under all its names. Unfortunately, there are many (too many) who will “buy” this crap; those who only want a “free ride” in this world, and who wish to live with someone else paying the bills. This kind of thing really makes Rush mad. Me, too. (The Blaze)

Monday, May 26, 2014

"Constitution-Free Zone"

How do politicians get away with blatant unconstitutional acts like these? From what I can see, this has been in effect since—forever. And nobody has seen fit to do anything about it. My question is this: “Where IN the Constitution does it say ANYBODY can establish a “zone” within the United States where the constitution does not apply?” But they have done it, and it is being ENFORCED upon us without our knowledge (unless it affects us personally)—mainly because many of us do not pay attention to what our politicians are doing to us.. This is so blatant of a violation of the Constitution that SOMETHING must be done about it; but is there ANYBODY out there who has the gonads? I doubt it. (Liberty Alliance)

Rush Is Really Mad

About the Marxist-inspired book, “Capital,” by Thomas Pickenny that advocates collectivist (communist, socialist) principles as the best way to go. And I don’t blame him (Rush). Freedom of speech allows people to write STUPID books, too. “In the book, Piketty argues that pervasive inequality is the natural end of capitalism, with the wealthy growing wealthier as the rate of return on their assets outpaces overall economic growth. With the rich getting richer to the detriment of everyone else, Piketty proposes (i) taxing incomes on the highest earners at 80% rate, and (ii) levying an annual progressive global wealth tax.” What he’s preaching is THEFT from those who earned it for the benefit of the “drones” of society and that’s the BASIS of collectivism under all its names. Unfortunately, there are many (too many) who will “buy” this crap; those who only want a “free ride” in this world, and who wish to live with someone else paying the bills. This kind of thing really makes Rush mad. Me, too. (The Blaze)

Good for Us, Not for Them

Shannon Watts, of “Moms Against Guns” (or some such bullcrap name), appeared at the Moms' soiree held well away from the NRA meeting in Indianapolis and, to all reports, she (AND other anti-gun fools) were accompanied by tough-looking, black suited ogres with suspicious bulges under their arms or at their backs. Seems like all anti-gun fools who show up at such gatherings do so with ARMED security while they insist on DENYING us “little people” such rights. This is not a new development. Politicians (like Sen. Diane Feinstein) who work HARD to deny us the right to self defense and to carry the means to it, a gun, go around armed themselves, or surrounded by armed security. This is a well-known FACT. Not to be denied. I can also remember several liberal pundits who are adamantly AGAINST guns for “the little people,” but who themselves have and use guns in their own defense. (Gun Free Zone)

Sunday, May 25, 2014

Confusing the Law

Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana, just signed two laws to allow people who have carry permits to carry their guns into places where they serve alcohol. But not if the place makes most of their money from that alcohol. Restaurants that serve alcohol with food are okay. Cops and other “officials” are allowed to carry their guns in such places (unless their superiors deem otherwise), but they can’t drink while armed. Of course, those on “official business” will be allowed to carry them. Sound confusing? You bet. Even conservatives like Jindal can succumb to the wishes of the “anti-gun fool crowd” partially in how he makes his laws. He also signed a version of the ‘”Stand Your Ground” law allowing you to kill an intruder if you feel threatened. But if you hurt him, but do not kill him, it’s murkier. And you will need a battery of lawyers to straighten it out—so you might as well shoot to kill. This “stand your ground” law doesn’t apply if you’re outdoors. Domestic abusers would be denied the right to own a gun for ten years if they are under a protective order. But you know courts give these out like candy. My head hurts just trying to figure it out. I’d hate to be being shot at while trying. (Times-Picayune)

You Can't Do It By Law

There is a big push today (and yesterday, and before) to raise the minimum wage. You know, that wage that people with no skills get paid for doing “scut work” because they have no skills yet and aren’t worth a whole lot of money? That part of the employment factor is set aside for people ENTERING the work market to LEARN the skills they need to rise to higher salary levels. To pay them the wage reserved for people with skills is absurd. Liberals want to give them that wage NOW, before they learn enough skills to be WORTH that higher wage. What they don’t understand is that such people are mostly KIDS, mostly still living at home. But they PRETEND that such salaries go to mostly people with families and kids of their own, which is not true. Not even CLOSE. People who have no skills at that stage of their lives have only THEMSELVES to blame for it. People at the very beginning of their working life are just NOT WORTH high salaries and to have the government make a law to FORCE employers to pay them more, until they bring some SKILLS to the table, is idiocy of the highest sort. All it does is ELIMINATE such positions and create more unemployment in that skill category. What they preach SOUNDS good, but people with no skills aren’t WORTH high salaries. I doubt if liberal politicians will ever learn that. (Brookings Institute)