John Roberts IS "The Slave Judge"

Chris Matthews says Judge Roberts doesn’t want to be the “slave judge” who was vilified for the rest of his life after being the “swing vote” to uphold the “Fugitive Slave Act.” He has, in fact, done exactly that. He has made slaves of all Americans in an effort not to offend Obama by “siccing” the IRS on us if we don’t buy health insurance, even if we CAN’T afford it. I repeat: “What part of ‘I can’t afford it’ don’t you understand, Obama?” Does he really think making a LAW will change that? What a FOOL we have stupidly elected president. I hope America is smart enough to fix that in November. (Media Research Center)

AG Holder Still Protesting

He’s been found in contempt of Congress. He’s still talking about a “witch hunt.” What he needs to do is realize that he did something wrong and he’s been caught. He needs to react accordingly and resign while other people do what he refused to do and give Congress the information they need to find out what REALLY happened, and who is responsible. People have DIED because of his actions, and he apparently doesn’t care. Nor does his boss, Obama. They tried to cover it up, and failed. This scandal should SINK Obama, as a much simpler one (where nobody died) did Nixon. (The Blaze)

No, It Will NOT!

There’s a “Global Caliphate Conference” in Chicago (Obama’s home town) that was cancelled after major protests against it. They still say “Sharia WILL rule the world!” How cocky are they? Sharia is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and there is NO WAY we are going to get rid of our Constitution without a fight! Thus, there is NO WAY Sharia Law will EVER “rule” in America. They might get a small number of decisions that MIGHT conform to Sharia Law, but such decisions will REMAIN few and far between. Sharia Law will NEVER “gain a foothold” here, and those who think it will are FOOLS. (The Blaze)

How Islam Worms Its Way Into Our Government

Hillary hired a former high-ranking member of the Muslim Brotherhood (an organization that has been determined to be a terrorist organization BY our government) as a member of her STAFF. How many other such staff appointments have been QUIETLY made by members of this administration? Soon such staff members will be quietly instituting Sharian Law principles into our legal system and we will not know about it until those principles are being enforced. Then it will be too late. (Front Porch Politics)

What's Wrong With Legalizing Drugs?

The “drug war” has been a colossal failure. All it has done is give the government an excuse to make more and more laws, some of them even unconstitutional, to “fight the war on drugs” while drug dealers and drug cartels keep right on supplying drugs to weak-minded Americans. It has done NOTHING to stop, or even SLOW DOWN the flow of drugs into our schools (right down to grade schools) and our neighborhoods. Being “illegal” forces prices high enough to ensure a huge profit, enough to make it profitable to push onto even tiny children, who must steal from their parents to buy them. What is the result? There are MORE people abusing drugs now than there were when it started. Those wishing to KEEP the “war on drugs” going say people who want to legalize drugs (like me) just want to keep the drugs coming. That’s the words of a fool. I’ve NEVER used drugs. I’m probably the last person on earth who has no idea what marijuana tastes like (though I DO know what it smells like, after 18 years as a paramedic, scraping addicts off the streets).

I have lost TWO of my children to drugs, (one to booze AND drugs, the other to an overdose) so don’t you DARE tell me I’m somebody who wants the flow of drugs to continue. What I DO want is for somebody to find a good SUBSTITUTE, one that will DO what the “war on drugs” was designed to do: STOP the flow of drugs. Legalizing them will force the price down to the point where the drug cartels and your local drug dealers won’t see enough profit to make the risk in selling them worthwhile. People will criticize me for this, but to them I say, “Do you have anything better?” Something that will WORK? The “war on drugs” certainly hasn’t worked, and has created a lot of violence in addition to killing off their own customers, but they don't care, there are enough new customers to make up the difference. So why should we keep doing the same thing over and over and hoping for a different result? That’s the definition of crazy. Are we crazy? (Raw Story)

Obama Fighting to NOT Enforce Laws

What is it with this president? He does everything he can to PREVENT enforcement of our immigration laws, even to the point of SUING states to prevent THEM from doing so, since he won’t. In the case cited in this article, he is suing to stop an egg farmer from requiring identification from its employees so it can make sure it is not hiring illegal aliens (which could get HIM in jail). This is just one incident in his efforts to destroy our ability to find illegal aliens. What is he trying to do? This egg farmer is just trying to follow the law and he’s getting sued by the federal government, which has unlimited funds at its disposal to support its suit—while the egg farmer does not. This follows Obama’s suing Florida to stop them from purging their voter rolls of illegal or DEAD voters. They’re doing the same in Minnesota so we can’t know if a comedian was actually elected Senator, or STOLE the election. (Courier-Journal)

Iran's Incompetence

The leaders in Iran, like the leaders in America and almost everywhere else, are incompetent. Their latest stupid statement is this: “Accept our terms—or else.” Or else, what? You’ll send your entire nuclear arsenal, both bombs (or maybe just one), to some city you think you can reach, and hope you’ll still be in existence 30 minutes later? That our current wimpy “leaders” will say, “Oh, well,” and try to “talk to you” again? I admit with Obama in office, your theory MIGHT hold water. But I guarantee you if you do it and Obama doesn’t eliminate Iran from existence, he will DEFINITELY go down to an ignominious defeat in November while we find a president who WILL. The upshot is, Iran will soon cease to exist, even if Obama hasn’t the guts. (Just common sense)

Reading The Constitution

The Gun Owners of America were responsible for a congressman actually READING the Constitution of the United States in Congress. A document everybody on that floor should already be familiar with, but are not. I don’t know how many congresspeople sat there and read something else, or just ignored it—or how many just walked out, but at least they were given an OPPORTUNITY to hear the document that SHOULD be controlling their actions. Whether or not they did is in question. (Just common sense)

Famous Racists In History

Democrats like to paint Republicans as racists. There is only one problem with that: most of the famous racists down through history have been Democrats. The list has to be topped by Sen. Robert Byrd, a former high-ranking Klan member, Joining him has to be Jesse Jackson (one of his famous racist statements was to call New York City “Hymietown”), Al Sharpton, and (Calypso Louie) Farrakhan, though their racism is against white people. Byrd would probably chafe at being on the same list as those three, but that’s racism, isn’t it? FDR was a bigot and his biggest act of bigotry was against innocent Japanese, whom he imprisoned, just because they WERE Japanese during the second World War. Democrat Jimmy Byrnes was a close confidante of Roosevelt, and almost became Vice President. Then there’s Hugo Black, a former Klan member who became a Supreme Court member. Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-SC), Rep. Dick Gephart (D-MO), Andrew Cuomo, Clinton’s former Housing Secretary, and Mary Frances Barry, who was appointed head of the U. S. commission on Civil Rights, fergawd’ssake! J. William Fulbright (D-AR), Clinton’s mentor, Albert Gore, Sr (he opposed the Civil Rights Act). Sam Ervin(D-SC), and so many more I haven’t room to even list their names. And they say the Republicans are the racists! What a load of BS! (GOP Capitalist)

"Islamaphobe"

This is a made-up term to make people believe the very act of disliking Islamic terrorists is, somehow, a mental aberration. It is not. Like a similar term that came before it, “Homophobe,” it is designed to blunt criticism without the bother of making an argument. This is phoniness personified. Call me what you want, it doesn’t make it so. Another made-up term designed to blunt criticism without the bother of making an argument is “birther,” which Obamma came up with to avoid answering questions about his eligibility to BE president because of his foreign birth. This is the liberals’ method to avoid answering “sticky questions” they can’t answer by making the questioner stop asking the questions while defending against the names they’re being called. (Just common sense)

Another Stupid Actress

Amanda Bynes got arrested for DUI and wants OBAMA to “fire the cop who arrested her.” Doesn’t she know Obama has no power to do that? Does she think Obama is a dictator who can fire a cop for doing his duty? How stupid is this broad? She says, “I don’t drink.” But it seems to me the cop saw something that made him think she was drunk or he wouldn’t have arrested her. They don’t just go out and say, “Who can we arrest wrongly today?” Anyway, she thinks the president can fire him, and WILL, just because she asks him to do it. How much of a FOOL is she? Maybe she's going by Obama doing so many things he hasn't the power to do, with no retribution. (Reuters)

No Cooperation At All

The “Twister-In-Chief, Jay Carney, says Holder and the DOJ “have cooperated with Congress.” They have not. They have spent MONTHS “stonewalling” on “Fast & Furious” while attempting still to throw all the blame for their problems AND "Fast & Furious" onto Bush and the Republicans. They say they have sent 7,600 documents in response to Congress' “demands.” They have not. They have created a “document dump” of thousands of documents that have nothing to do with what Congress asked for. Something to waste their time and advance the investigation not at all. Holder is an expert at deflecting questions with 50,000 word essays that do not address the questions asked. He has been rightly designated in contempt of Congress. But will it stick? Doubtful. Obama will come up with SOMETHING to “make it go away.” He’s good at twisting things like that. (The Hill)

Jerkson Wants to Get Rid of Guns

Like many liberals, Jesse Jerkson wants to get rid of guns entirely. He can’t even CONCEIVE of the fact that it can’t be done, not the fact that even if it COULD, you would not eliminate violence. First of all, CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING, will NOT obey one that says they can’t be armed. And if we were miraculously successful in eliminating ALL guns, criminals would find something else with which to attack others. Like back in the days when everybody who could afford one carried a sword, while those who couldn’t were their victims or just used clubs. Violent people WILL do violence, if they have to use a club. I can’t believe so many otherwise intelligent people (Jerkson excepted) can’t understand this. (The Blaze)

The Coverup Continues

To avoid a “contempt of Congress” citation, our criminal president, now a KILLER president, granted Attorney General Holder “Executive Privilege” over the documents Congress has subpoenaed, so as to cement the coverup over his OWN involvement in the death of a Border Patrol member. The only thing that can save this president from impeachment is the lack of sufficient time left in his tenure to get it done. He WILL be impeached, in the best way possible: by the vote of the people. He still displays “unshakable confidence” in his ability to get re-elected. But I think he and his accomplices are “shaking in their boots” because they KNOW they’re all going to be fired in November. (The Blaze)

Wisconsin Is A USA Microcosm

This “recall election” that was won by the governor in Wisconsin is a microcosm of what is going on all over the United States. Alexis De Tocqeville (French political thinker and historian) said, "The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can bribe the people with their own money." And that is exactly what is happening in Wisconsin AND America. In Wisconsin they tried to get rid of a Republican governor who kept his promise to bring the budget under control, but the people didn’t like how he did it. He did it by getting rid of many of the “giveaway programs” they had come to think of as their right. This is how we got such a “free-spender” as Obama, who is in the process of “giving away the store.” If Obama is re-elected, it will be an illustration of the truth of this statement. Even though the Wisconsin governor was NOT recalled, just the move to recall him is evidence of the truth of this statement. (United States History)

Killing the Goose...

Obama seems set on “killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.” Liberals (including Obama) are fundamentally incompetent; they hate the very things that FUEL this economy. They hate PROFIT, first of all, which is what keeps the economy moving. Without profits, there is no money for the government to STEAL and “redistribute” to their friends and contributors. They hate all the “big corporations,” whose profits keep this society moving while they (big and small corporations and businesses) CREATE JOBS; something Obama claims to do, but doesn’t. He can’t, except by creating an atmosphere that allows those big corporations, as well as smaller companies, to do so. Government DOES NOT create new wealth; private enterprise does. Government STEALS the profits EARNED by private enterprise under the FREE MARKET. But liberals HATE the free market and want to put CHAINS on it while STEALING as much money it can from the people engaged in it. Does anybody with any intelligence at all wonder why THE WORLD is going bankrupt?

That’s easy: the world is mostly run by liberals (socialists), who are experts at “getting elected,” but not at much else. France, for instance, is bankrupt because of their socialist programs. And when their president cut back on them, which the French had come to view as their right, they got rid of him and elected a socialist, who would continue the programs that PUT them into bankruptcy. Many other European countries are bankrupt and the European Union is about to fail because of similar socialist programs. The “Euro” (the money of the European Union) is about to disappear. This is all because of the INCOMPETENCE of the liberals running things, all of whom regard SOCIALISM in one form or another as “the way to go.” This is their main incompetence and if they're allowed to continue to run things, will cause the entire WORLD to “go under.” This is what Obama wants to bring to us. (Just common sense)

Is It Beginning?

Thugs beat homeowner who removed Democrat election signs that were placed in his yard (on his personal property) without his permission. Is this the kind of thuggism we can expect from Democrats as the 2012 election goes forward? This smacks of the actions that are taken by desperate-to-win politicians. It also interests me that these thugs have not yet (as this writing) been “brought to justice.” Are the “authorities” in that area mostly Democrat? Will they really “investigate” this case in ANY case? Or will they call it “a political dispute” and ignore it? As a blogger who is DEFINITELY not liberal, will I someday be the subject of such a beating? And if so, will ANYBODY in Democrat-dominated Denver, Colorado do anything about it? (Gateway Pundit)

Socialism NEEDS The Free Market

Socialists say they HATE the free market, or “capitalism,” as they call it derisively. But what they don’t say is socialism NEEDS the free market in order to have earned money they can steal so as to survive. Without the money EARNED by people in the free market, socialists have no money or property to STEAL and “redistribute.” That’s a question they never answer: “Where does the money come from under socialism?” That’s because they can’t. They just start calling you names. Socialism is a system that emphasizes mediocrity. They want “a fair share for everyone,” even those who can’t (or won’t) earn for themselves. Yes, it’s right to help those who CAN’T help themselves because of old age or illness, or infirmity, but to “help” able-bodied people who just will not work is silly and wrong. They don’t deserve a “fair shake.” The trouble with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of "other people's money." (Just common sense)

"Ruled" By the Mafia

Well, maybe not. But it’s just as bad as long as Obama and his band of criminals remain in office. He has STOLEN trillions of dollars and given them to his friends and donators to his election committees by “financing” their “green energy companies" that last only long enough to cash the check he sent them, then declare bankruptcy just as he knew they would. The people now in charge in Washington ARE criminals just as bad as the Mafia and will continue to steal from us as long as they remain in office. The very man charged with ENFORCING the law (Eric Holder) CHOOSES which laws he will enforce while actively shipping guns to the Mexican drug cartels to “prove” his thesis that their guns are provided by Americans so they can make tighter anti-gun laws. People die, but they don’t care. They say “You gotta break eggs to make an omelet.” I’m sickened by what I clearly see going on in Washington and am thankful I won’t be around much longer to see the end. I don’t want to live under a regime (which is Obama's plan, with him in charge) modeled after the Soviet Union. (Just common sense)

Where Are Al and Jesse?

They’re usually right there when a white man (or anybody they can CLAIM to be a white man) hurts or kills a black man, but where are they when black men kill a white woman? Nowhere, of course. Black on white violence doesn’t advance their “cause,” which is to fill their pockets with money by threatening to accuse large corporations of racism. When black men kill a white woman (OR a white man) they don’t care. They say it’s just “Karma.” Next thing, it’ll be a crime just to CRITICIZE the likes of Al or Jesse. They’re working in that direction. Or am I giving them ideas? (News With Attitude)