Sunday, April 29, 2012
Putting A Bounty on Zimmerman A Crime
The "New Black Panthers" put a $10,000.00 “bounty” on Zimmerman, “dead or alive.” Makes you wonder what they’ll do to him if somebody DELIVERS him for the bounty, doesn’t it? Will the law be enforced on the “New Black Panthers,” who are Attorney General Holder’s “people” and Obama supporters? Not likely. This government seems to enforce ONLY the laws they like, rather than ALL of them, as they pledged to do when they were sworn it. Obama even went so far as to SUE the State of Arizona for having the temerity to make a law to FORCE the feds to enforce their own immigration laws, which he REFUSES to enforce. That’s against the law. But unfortunately the law it is against has no provision to PUNISH the offender so he gets away with it. (Just common sense)
Obama's New "Atrocities" Czar
Once again, he has appointed a new “czar” without oversight by Congress. Somebody who has NO authority but whose “authority” will be upheld by Obama and his thugs. This woman is “tasked” with “ferreting out” atrocities, and I’ll bet she’ll find some (among US, not among Islamic terrorists), even if they don’t exist. “President Obama’s 'National Security Adviser' Samantha Power will head the new White House Atrocities Prevention Board, which is tasked with formulating a response to war crimes, crimes against humanity and mass atrocities.” They CALL her a "National Security Adviser," but that’s not her job. Her job is to FIND “atrocities” wherever she can, and persecute them. No, I didn’t use the wrong word. The word I MEANT to use is “persecute,” because that’s what she will do. She has no authority to do otherwise, even though Obama’s thugs will back her to the hilt. How many “czars” doe he have now? I don’t know. I don’t think anyone will EVER know. These people are the ones he will count on to help him RULE this country when we move on to socialism. Gad, we need to get rid of this Chicago thug! I might add she has a pro-Palestinian "tilt." (Washington Times)
Saturday, April 28, 2012
Zimmerman's Media Lynching
Yes, George Zimmerman did kill a black man. And he claims the black man was beating the hell out of him and threatened to kill him. Zimmerman had bloody wounds on the back of his head and word is, his nose is broken, which, if true, backs up his story. But you don’t hear about that in the liberal media. You also don’t hear about the complete LACK of injuries (except for the bullet hole) in Treyvon Martin. So we don’t know what happened. Only two people do, and one of those is dead. The other is charged with his death. Nobody seems to believe the one left alive that he was defending his life when he shot Treyvon. But the media is “lynching” him anyway. Even though THEY don’t know for sure what happened, either. But they are proceeding as if they did. I’d be the first to say that Zimmerman should be punished if he is lying and it can be proven. But nobody has proven it yet—and maybe never will. I don’t think Zimmerman set out to kill a black man that day, though the media pretty much has said he did. I think EVERYBODY should “step back,” look further, and not act until they get REAL PROOF of something. I’m afraid of what will happen if he IS deemed to be not guilty due to self defense. His life as he knew it, is over in any case. Some blacks are openly calling for violence if he isn’t found guilty of first degree murder and executed. One black group has posted a $10,000.00 reward for him, “dead or alive.” What are they going to do with him if someone collects that reward? Murder him themselves, or pay the person who did? I think all the “race baiters” such as Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and (Calypso Louie) Farrakhan should “butt out” and go home. Only ignorant people take them seriously any more, anyway. But even ignorant people can cause a lot of trouble, and they will, if they don’t like the outcome. (Dan Joppich/Western Center for Journalism)
"They've Run Out of Lunatics"
Ted Nugent, well-known rock star and conservative speaker is going to be “investigated” by the Secret Service. Maybe they’ve “run out of lunatics,” as Mark Belling said, on the Rush Limbaugh show. Actually, they’ve run out of non-Obama friends that are lunatics. They ignore “Rev.” Wright and his foaming at the mouth because he’s black, and Obama’s friend. They ignore Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, both “race-baiters” and proponents of violence because they’re black and Obama’s friends. They ignore (Calypso Louie) Farrakhan’s outrageous calling for violence and revolution because he’s black, and Muslim, which makes him Obama’s friend. Then there’s Bill Ayers, who bombed the Pentagon and is not sorry, who wants to ELIMINATE capitalism, who is white, but is still Obama’s friend. He also had a hand in STARTING Obama’s rise to power. What do all these people have in common? They’re all Obama’s friends. Nugent is not. Of course, just my mention of the most of them being black as well as being Obama’s friends, will make liberals call me a racist in a “knee-jerk” reaction. But I don’t care. It won’t be the first time, and that phony charge has lost its meaning through overuse. (Washington Post)
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Showing His Stupidity (Again)
Obama says (through one of his idiots) that “the war on Islamic terrorism is over.” He actually thinks that killing a few of their top people will win this war. I got news for him: it won’t be over until ALL the Islamic extremists are dead. Whenever we “cut off their head,” another one will pop up and they will keep on wantonly killing us, with even more regularity if we don’t stop them. Damn, we need to get rid of this ignorant b-stard before he GIVES this country away. Frankly, I think he has already done it. It might be too late. There might not be anything the Republicans can do to stop what he has put in motion. Maybe we can only hope to slow it down. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more BLIND president. He only sees what he WANTS to see, for his own purposes. (Conservative Byte)
Beck's Got A Point
The government is “investigating” Ted Nugent (something they’ve wanted to do for a long time) for his comments before a NRA meeting, but they have studiously IGNORED remarks made by black race-baiter Louis (Calypso Louie) Farrakhan that amount to instigation to revolution, saying he “means nothing” because “he’s nobody.” Well, he’s as much a “somebody” as is Nugent, and he has made comments of a much more incendiary nature. But he’s both black AND a Muslim, so they leave him alone. I think they ignore his comments to our detriment. (The Blaze)
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Socialism Is NOT "An Imperitave"
Communists say, “socialism is an imperative.” It is NOT. It is the free market, which communists and socialists (a repetition, there) hate, that is the only reason why this country has exceeded (in little more than 300 years) the progress made by countries that have been around for THOUSANDS of years,. It is the reason people from countries all over the world see America as “the destination of choice” to better themselves. To say socialism is an imperative shows ignorance if they believe it, and STUPIDITY if they are just saying so. Collectivism, in any of its many forms, (socialism, communism, progressivism, Naziism, etc.) failed abjectly in Russia, which was, for a time, their “showcase country” because it SEEMED to be working—until it failed because it couldn’t keep up with us. Socialism does NOT create new wealth; it merely REDISTRIBUTES that earned by others to those who do NOT earn. That’s the fatal flaw in socialism. Sooner or later they run out of other people’s money to steal and redistribute. Then they fail, as did Russia. (The Blaze)
"Out of the Dark, Into the Light"
What a stupid, STUPID remark for Michelle Obama to make! Obama has led us out of the light into the darkness! Does she think we are STUPID? I think SHE is stupid as a stump to even make such a stupid statement as this with Obama’s record—a record he dare not mention in running for re-election, and she has the GALL to say such a thing? It makes me SICK to even hear this woman speak because I know that whatever comes out of her mouth will not be grounded in fact, but will be grounded in STUPIDITY and ignorance. Of course, they’ll call me racist for criticizing this stupid woman, but that’s okay. I’m used to their stupidity. What amazes me more is she got applause from the ignorant people in the audience when she said it. It is this kind of people who make me AFRAID for our country. They’re stupid, and they vote. (The Blaze)
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Fools! Fools! DAMNED Fools!
Washington is taking Arizona Governor Jan Brewer to the Supreme Court in their monstrous effort to avoid enforcing immigration laws and allow illegal immigrants to “run wild.” Arizona passed a law almost IDENTICAL to the federal law Obama REFUSES to enforce, which basically told Obama he MUST enforce his law or Arizona would do it for him. So Obama took her to court and it is now ready to be heard. Democrats (Obama) say they don’t care what the court thinks, they’ll repeal the law. The fact they don’t have the votes to do so doesn’t seem to occur to them. This president is a FOOL and is surrounded by fools. House Speaker Bohner says he will be “hard to beat.” That shows HIS incompetence, since the way I see it, Obama will be about the easiest president ever to beat, with the record he has. He lies and lies, makes laws that will, if allowed to continue, ENSLAVE us, and make this into a socialist country. He has spent more of OUR money than there IS, and is borrowing more from our chief enemy, communist China, thus allowing them, sometime in the future, to give us orders or cut us off. He has passed a law that, if upheld, will give him CONTROL of our medical health, one-seventh of this economy. He has made economical decisions that will BANKRUPT us. He has PLEDGED to BANKRUPT the coal industry—an industry that is ESSENTIAL to the production of electricity, which is just ONE of the things for which it is essential, without having ANYTHING viable to replace it. He is the ENEMY of oil, which is another ESSENTIAL industry, again without anything viable to replace it. He has promised “transparency” and the “rule of law” while ignoring both. He is UNarguably the WORST president we have had in my memory and if he is allowed to continue will DESTROY this country as we knew it. (Just common sense)
I don't THINK So!
They say the government is set to SUE “Sheriff Joe” Arpaio for “targeting Latinos.” What a bunch of bull! Something like that might have happened in the past in his county before he found out about it. But he has largely put a stop to it. But Obama forces won’t even give him a copy of the supposed “22 page report” upon which they SAY they will base their suit. The flow of paperwork is a “one-way street.” Arpaio has sent them hundreds of pages on demand and has gotten NOTHING back. I think they haven’t sent him anything because they HAVE nothing to send. As to a suit? Maybe. Talk of a suit is just Obama’s way of attempting to intimidate Joe. That’s Obama’s “modus operandi,” and one he is attempting to use on the Supreme Court . It isn’t going to work with Joe because he’s a man who is a lot stronger than this false president. It won’t work on the court because there’s nothing Obama can do to them. (Reuters)
Sunday, April 22, 2012
Keeping Guns Away From Blacks
The Democrats keep trying to paint Republicans as racists, but if you do some research, you’ll find that the REAL racists, as a group, are liberals (Democrats). It was the DEMOCRATS that blacks were demonstrating against in the sixties. Martin Luther King was against DEMOCRATS, not Republicans. The KKK was started by the DEMOCRATS, and that is a well-kept secret. It was the REPUBLICANS who got the “equal rights law” passed, over stiff DEMOCRAT opposition. The Democrats passed all kinds of laws keeping guns out of the hands of Americans for one reason: so blacks would not have guns. But it didn’t work. Blacks probably have more illegal guns in their hands than whites ever thought about because anti-gun laws DON’T WORK. The tighter anti-gun laws are in ANY area, the easier it is to get ILLEGAL guns. CRIMINALS do not OBEY laws that say they can’t be armed. They disobey laws for a living. (Ann Coulter/Human Events)
Bullying Isn't the Cause
Many people say students who have been bullied in school is the cause of so many school shootings these days. It is NOT. I was bullied when I was in grade school, and I never went out and killed a lot of people. The bullying continued right up to the time I took my father’s advice and fought back, showing the bully(ies) it would no longer be easy to bully me. Even if I lost, it still “sent a message” to the bully, who thereafter left me alone. And word evidently got around, because ALL the bullies left me alone after that, right into high school. I never had any trouble with bullies after that. The CAUSE is simply the sure knowledge there won’t be any guns in the school in the hands of people he might not expect to be armed. With schools being "gun-free zones," shooters are ASSURED nobody they don't know about (like the principal) might be armed and willing to “put a couple into them” while they're shooting the unarmed students and teachers. (Mail.com)
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Another Obama "Witch Hunt"
Every day Obama seems to come up with another “villain” to go after. Today it’s “oil speculators and manipulators.” He can’t cite any EVIDENCE of that, but he’s going to spend another $50 million dollars or so to search for it. Spending our money is what Obama does best. And I’d bet he’ll find SOMETHING he can cite as “evidence” if he spends that much money. “Evidence” in his mind, at least. Remember, Obama is the man who has PLEDGED to “bankrupt the coal industry” even though there is NO viable replacement for this industry, which is ESSENTIAL to the production of ELECTRICITY, as well as many other things, in addition to keeping us warm in the winter. Obama is obviously not the sort of person who can look ahead and figure out the results of his misguided promises. Or he is, and he just doesn’t care. Obama is out to PUNISH our “achievers,” no matter WHAT the result. This man is DANGEROUS! We need to get rid of him before he can do us any more damage. (Human Events)
"Authorities" Take Newborn From Hospital
All day hospital people have been giving this mother conflicting information about her baby, then denying they did it. They have been doing things to that baby not allowed without parental consent. A social worker has been threatening to “take the baby” if she did not agree to things they would not answer her questions about. “Put yourself in Jodi’s shoes at this moment. You gave birth that morning in an ambulance. The hospital has made wild and conflicting claims about your baby’s health all day long. You are exhausted. You are in pain. Your husband has gone to check on your children. And a social worker who has threatened to take your baby into police custody is standing in your hospital room demanding that you make an immediate decision.” What would you do? I’d take the baby and leave. But with today’s “child protectors” that would make me a lawbreaker. They can’t say what law, but the police would back them to the hilt. “Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!” so the cops ended up taking the baby on the basis of the social worker’s claims. They claimed (a lie) that the child was suffering from illness or injury, which gave them the right to take the child.
When a judicial officer finally came and heard the case after the parents had been summarily thrown out of the hospital, he (she) returned custody of the child to her parents. Social workers these days tens to take in a lot more territory than they are entitled to, and the police back them to the hilt, no matter WHAT the law says. And they get away with it until REAL lawyers and judges can intervene. This is a travesty for somebody like Jodi to be subjected to this while going through the pain of childbirth. I wish I could say this is an unusual story; I cannot. It happens every day, all over the country. We need to put a stop to the overreaction of social workers (“child protectors”) backed up by cops who don’t know they are breaking the laws they are supposed to be enforcing. There should be a law passed REQUIRING them to show the law they’re enforcing on demand BEFORE any action can be taken. They should also be required to recite something like a “Miranda Warning” before any action can be taken. Do you think that will ever happen? Doubtful. (HSLDA)
When a judicial officer finally came and heard the case after the parents had been summarily thrown out of the hospital, he (she) returned custody of the child to her parents. Social workers these days tens to take in a lot more territory than they are entitled to, and the police back them to the hilt, no matter WHAT the law says. And they get away with it until REAL lawyers and judges can intervene. This is a travesty for somebody like Jodi to be subjected to this while going through the pain of childbirth. I wish I could say this is an unusual story; I cannot. It happens every day, all over the country. We need to put a stop to the overreaction of social workers (“child protectors”) backed up by cops who don’t know they are breaking the laws they are supposed to be enforcing. There should be a law passed REQUIRING them to show the law they’re enforcing on demand BEFORE any action can be taken. They should also be required to recite something like a “Miranda Warning” before any action can be taken. Do you think that will ever happen? Doubtful. (HSLDA)
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Americans Pose With Terrorist Body Parts
What, AGAIN? They didn’t get enough terrorist recruits the first time they did this two years ago? Maybe they need to publish some pictures of murdered Muslims—people murdered by Islamic terrorists (sometimes in front of TV cameras). Maybe that would get more recruits for people who delight in murdering people who don’t believe the same way they do, and even some who do. American spineless politicians are so afraid of “giving them a recruiting poster picture” they’ll do ANYTHING to appease these killers. You know, those politicians who gave $50,000 to each victim of that SUPPOSED American soldier killing of Afghans, before even knowing the entire story—which on its face is phony because what is supposed to have happened could not possibly have HAPPENED that way. I guess that’s a result of giving them the authority to “spread the money around” without controls. Gad, the abysmal STUPIDITY of our politicians never ceases to amaze me and make me want to barf. (L. A. Times)
Will You See This in the Liberal Media?
I’m not in any way simpatico to “militias” who express hatred of the cops. I believe the police have a very definite role in protecting us, even if they aren’t very effective in doing so. But we’ve all heard about Holder’s action against the “Hutaree” militia. The media made sure of that. But now that they (the militia) have won, do you think we’ll hear about that in the liberal media? Doubtful. I’ll be watching closely to see if they even “notice” it. (Patriot Action Network)
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Typical Obama Lies
Now he’s trying to convince us that Ronald Reagan was a of of what he’s saying. That’s because there ISN’T any. It’s an out-and-out LIE, like his imaginary “wild-eyed socialist, tax hiking class warrior.” Only problem is, that’s a lie. Notice he didn’t come up with any proof of what he’s saying. That’s because there ISN’T any. It’s an out-and-out LIE, like his imaginary “war on women,” started by George Stephanopolous with an “out of left field” question for a Republican presidential candidate. He’s counting on the people who “pay no attention to politics” believing him and voting without knowing ANYTHING. That’s how he got to be president in the first place. (The Blaze)
"Fearing" People Not Giving A "Free Ride"
This is a typical example of the liberals picking ONE case out of many that supports their effort to break the law while CLAIMING to be “helping people.” There are organizations to help these people; organizations supported by people who have given their PERMISSION to that organization to take money from them to help, rather than take money from people whose permission had not even been demanded at the point of a gun to “help” them. Obama’s health care swindle is AGAINST THE LAW and takes money from people without their permission. Whatever the “benefits,” it is THEFT. (CNN)
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Going Bankrupt On Our Money
The "green" companies didn’t want the money because they thought they couldn’t compete in the market and it was useless to try. But Obama insisted on giving it to them, anyway. They told him, even as he was giving them trillions of dollars in loan guarantees that they couldn’t compete and were going to go bankrupt. Obama persisted and gave them the money anyway. When they went bankrupt, nobody knows where most of the money went, and Obama didn’t seriously ask. This is his way of “paying back” his donors and he was determined to get the job done. (Rush Limbaugh)
Banning Free Speech
Obama recently signed into law (in secret) a measure that allows the Secret Service to DECIDE where it is legal to express your constitutional right to free speech and charge you with a FELONY at their discretion. That’s what Obama is trying to do: create a precedent that allows him to say WHERE free speech will be “allowed.” How does he figure he can “allow” or “disallow” free speech ANYWHERE? Freedom of speech is GUARANTEED everywhere in the United States in the Constitution. You cannot make LAW that violates the Constitution because the constitution is the BASIS for every law Congress makes. Obama is trying hard to gain rights and powers the constitution denies him as president. It won’t work. If I get a letter or a visit from the feds telling me I’ve said or written something he deems wrong, I’ll tell him (or his rep) to screw off. (Patriot Action Network)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
