Wednesday, March 31, 2010

No Guns Needed

A man walked into a school in China, and killed eight (count ‘em, EIGHT) children. NOBODY in the school was armed and able to stop him because of STIFF anti-gun laws in communist China. “SHANGHAI — A former community doctor allegedly stabbed to death eight children and injured five others at a primary school in east China's Fujian province, the authorities said, as China grapples with a rise in high-profile criminal violence in its cities.” Notice, in a country with “no-nonsense” anti-gun laws for its citizens, criminals find a way to increase the violence. This proves my thesis that if there were NO GUNS in society, the “bad guys” would find a way to kill, maim, and intimidate people. The answer is to allow RESPONSIBLE people to get “carry” permits easily, or just make carrying guns “under cover” legal so those (usually) illegally armed criminals cannot ever be sure their intended victims will not be armed and able to defend themselves. There's certainly nothing out there to keep criminals from getting their illegal guns. This would cause most of them (criminals are basically cowards) to go into other lines of crime. (Wall Street Journal)

Children Out Of Control

In New York, bands of children are beating up on random people and the ”authorities” are upset about it and want to “hold the parents responsible.” The “child protectors” will PUT YOU IN PRISON if you so much as “raise your hand” to your children, and when they predictably get in trouble, they want to hold YOU responsible. I think the “child protection services” (no matter what name they go under) should be held responsible for making it impossible to control your children. I would never “beat” a child. But corporal punishment should NEVER be removed from consideration. If a child KNOWS ha/she will NEVER suffer it, he/she will be uncontrollable. In my case, I used mild corporal punishment on my children early in their lives so they’d know I would do it. In their later childhood it was not necessary BECAUSE they knew I would do it.

But you can’t convince these “child protectors” of that. They have “dirty minds” and they think ANY corporal punishment is “beating” the child. They think ANY “touching” of a child is sex abuse. They overreact as a matter of course. They will “swoop in” and REMOVE the child as a FIRST OPTION at the slightest hint of physical punishment. Then they’ll tell the child (if they’re allowed to return home at all) that all they have to do is “drop a dime” on their parents if they EVER feel they’re being “abused,” and they’ll “take care of it.” So next thing that happens, the kids tell you they’ll “tell CPS” if you do so much as put them on restriction, and the “child protectors” will come out and harass you, maybe even put you in prison. This abuse of the system has GOT to stop before they ruin our youth entirely. (New York Examiner)

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

ACORN Shutting Down?

After all the whining and crying about the unfairness of the video showing their people agreeing to help a pimp and prostitute set up a whorehouse and fool the government, threatening to sue them, they’ve decided to shut down because of a lack of funds. Their donors, having seen what they do, stopped supporting them. Maybe this should have been done BEFORE the 2008 election, to stop this monster (Obama) and all his monster friends (Democrats) from being elected. Maybe if they were fighting for their very lives, they couldn’t steal enough votes to get them elected. Later information tells us they're just changing their name, as liberals always do when people "catch on" to the name they're using. (Washington Examiner)

He Does It Again!

Tinsley sums up the entire political picture in one illustration, something he does really well. I swear, this man is a genius, which is why liberals hate him so much. He makes them all look silly, and with ease. Of course, it’s easy to make liberals look silly, but he does it easier than anybody else I know. I'd suggest running him for president, but when he won (he would, as would Mickey Mouse if he ran against Obama), he wouldn't have time to do his brilliant cartoons, and I wouldn't want that. (Mallard Fillmore)

Sunday, March 28, 2010

What would Reagan do?

It seems as if Obama is asking himself that question, then doing just the opposite. “Indeed, I sometimes suspect that Obama's sole approach to any policy problem is to ask himself ‘What Would Reagan Do?’ and then do the opposite--while expecting the same results. So, for instance, Obama thinks that by raising taxes, increasing spending, and weakening the dollar he can restore prosperity just as effectively as Reagan did by cutting taxes, slashing spending, and strengthening the dollar.” Obama has enough history to look at to figure out how to make this economy better, but he does exactly the opposite of what Reagan did to SUCCESSFULLY bring the economy back under control after the diaster caused by (Democrat) Jimmy Carter and his gang. The only way to repair what Obama is doing is to GET RID OF HIM after getting rid of his voting majority in the 2010 election. We MUST stymie him in his efforts to bankrupt this nation and make ALL your assets worth ZILCH! (Laura Ingraham)

Ia ACORN Going Away?

Don’t bet on it. They’re just “morphing” into something else under new names. They know they’ve been “found out” and are doing what most con men do when they’re “found out.” Change their name and move to another town. I did an item the other day about them “going bankrupt and changing their name.” They will be “Community Organizations International (COI) Watch for them to be in the same old business of vote-stealing and other crimes, but under new names and in a different place. Obama won’t be chasing them very far since he’s president because of them. (Washington Examiner)

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Making Many People Happy

This is funny, aside from the fact that these three would never be on the same plane at the same time. It it went down, we’d all be better off: “Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and Obama were on an airplane coming back from California to Washington. Harry Reid said; ‘If I dropped a $10,000 bill out the window, I would make one person very happy!’ Nancy Pelosi said; ‘If I dropped ten $1000 bills out the window, I would make ten people very happy!’ Obama said; ‘If I dropped one hundred $100 bills out the window, I would make one hundred people very happy!’ The pilot then turned around and said; ‘If I dropped the three of you out the window, I would make six billion people very happy!’ " (This was sent me by e-mail: author unknown) For any bureaucrats reading this: I do not promote "dropping Obama out of a plane." He clearly has a good life insurance policy with Joe and Nancy right behind him in line to replace him. the key to this joke is they're all on the same plane.)

Keeping Us Down

They beat us (narrowly) on Obama’s health care swindle. He has signed it. It is now “the law of the land.” To oppose it now with action is “lawbreaking” because these radical socialists are in power. So what do they do? Do they take time and celebrate? No. They break out the other VERY divisive issue they’ve had “waiting in the wings,” Immigration reform, which is “code” for “forgiving” illegal aliens and allowing them to vote. So who will they vote FOR? The DEMOCRATS, of course. Meanwhile, they’re trying to eliminate the ban on felons voting. Thus creating thousands, even MILLIONS MORE new voters who will predictably vote for whom? DEMOCRATS, of course, because they will be grateful to them for returning to them the right to vote. At the same time, these issues will keep US “stirred up” and “in the streets” while they paint us as the “bomb-throwers” THEY used to be in the sixties. Americans do not like “bomb-throwers.” They know that. That’s why they lost the last time. (Just common sense)

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Blaming Rush for "GOP Waterloo"

A single defeat, by just a few votes, does not a “Waterloo” make. And Rush is not to blame. His rhetoric nearly caused a “Waterloo” for Obama. It’s not a “Waterloo” unless you’re basing your personal future on it. “Looking at the state of both parties after President Obama’s health bill win in the House, ABC’s Terry Moran elevated the view of ‘prominent conservative’ David Frum [NOT a conservative -RT], author a year ago of Newsweek’s ‘Why Rush is Wrong’ cover story, who blamed Rush Limbaugh and Fox News for what he’s dubbed the GOP’s ‘Waterloo.’ On Nightline, Moran contended ‘anger, stoking it, expressing it, riding it...was the Republican strategy to defeat health care. And over the weekend all that anger got ugly, as some Democratic Members of Congress were called vial (sic), racial and anti-gay slurs’.” (ABC’s Terry Moran) But I’d bet those racial and anti-gay slurs were hurled by liberals, so they could blame them on conservatives. But you don’t have to be a conservative to be against Obama’s health care swindle. You only have to be somewhat intelligent, as the people who wrote this are apparently not, if they can’t spell a simple four-letter word like “vile.” (Media Research Center)

Ashamed to Be an American

I’m actually ashamed to be an American because of the stupidity of enough Americans to have actually elected a committed Marxist communist to the presidency. My own son is among those who think they “have more important things to do” than keep track of what their politicians are doing to them, and that what happens in Washington won’t affect them. He said as much the other day. He seems to think he, and his children will be dead and gone before Obama’s bill comes due. He’s wrong. He will begin paying higher taxes to pay for Obama’s “flights of fancy” next year and his sons will pay them all their lives. The longer Obama is in office and able to force his ideas on an unwilling populace, the higher his taxes will go and the more his life will be controlled by a nameless, faceless bureaucrat, somewhere. (Just common sense)

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Using Sick People As "Props"

Liberals like to use sick people as “props” to pass their swindles into law. We could do the same thing with those who are being raped by the CURRENT health programs, all set up by the government (mostly liberals, sometimes otherwise). For instance: the government FORCED me into Bush’s “prescription drug program” and wanted to FINE me for not signing up for it for the first two years. I never signed up for it, but apparently I’m a member. The maker of Plavix WAS supplying me with Plavix, since I couldn’t afford this expensive, life-saving medicine. But the very fact of my BEING on Bush’s program stops them from supplying me, by law. Now they’re slowly removing ANY benefits I might have had from it, but I’m still “in the program” so I can't get any elsewhere, not even if I pay for it. They want me to come to them, hat in hand, begging for it to be reinstated. I will not. They’ll probably want to fine me for that. (Just common sense)

It's All The Liberals' (Democrats) Fault

Just about every bad thing that has happened in this country such as depressions, recessions, inflation and such can be traced back (if you’re really looking) to a liberal (Democrat) administration in power. It doesn’t have to be a Democrat president (though that makes it worse), but a Democrat majority in Congress—or at least a near majority able to enact legislation inimical to the good of the American people (Reagan's Congress spent $1.25 for every $1.00 his tax reduction increased the "tax take"). Look at the makeup of our government in the year the income tax was enacted; or when the Federal Reserve was created. Or when the “big depression” started (not necessarily when it began, but just before it began). Then examine the measures put in place during that period. It takes a little research, not just “surface examination.” If a conservative (or just a Republican) administration was in power at any of those times, look at what’s behind the action, and see who voted FOR it. This year has been “doubled down in spades” as the Obama administration goes about gaily spending our money and killing our economy. (Just common sense)

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

America Has Been Summarily Raped

We didn’t want Obama’s health care swindle. We made that plain in many ways. But he did every dirty trick in the book to pass his scheme into law, and this is being written within minutes of his signing it into law. There are many places where it is unconstitutional, but one of the most well-known is the violation of the Tenth Amendment that disallows the government from FORCING us to buy something from a private vendor. Obama thinks the courts will support him, but he may be very wrong. I will certainly refuse to obey this edict, and I will NOT pay his fine. So if he wants to make an example of a 73-year-old man and send me to prison, let him. Now he’s going to set out on yet another trip to “sell” it to the American people. He still thinks we’re too stupid to understand his words and he wants to tell us again. (CNN)

Do They Really Believe It?

That’s what Chris Matthews is asking, while repeating the usual (Democrat talking points) lie that Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are only repeaters of the “GOP talking points” while he dutifully repeats all the Democrat talking points. When is HE going to wake up and discover that Obama and his “gang of thieves” are stealing from him as much as from everybody else? Maybe when it starts affecting his paycheck. Or do people like him even notice that, since they make a lot more than it takes to keep them going—unlike the rest of us. They make those “princely salaries” (millions of dollars) for fooling the public on a daily basis and criticize people who have EARNED their riches, just as if they did, too. (Media Research Center)

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Declaring War On Us

Our own government has declared war on us. Apparently, most Americans think it’s okay to burn 86 women and children to death (Waco, TX, under Clinton/Reno), and for a “government agent” to murder a woman with a child in her arms , from hiding (Ruby Ridge, again under Clinton/Reno). He was charged with murder by a state court and the feds used trickery to get him out of it, This apparently created a precedent when nobody was punished in either case. The man who murdered the mother with the child in her arms even got a commendation (quietly) for that murder. One man wrote to Ben Nighthorse Campbell, who answered that he didn’t give a damn what this man thought. This administration passes laws that are clearly unconstitutional and the Supreme Court allows it. Obama “rules” by Executive Order, trillion dollar laws to control us all are passed into law by “deeming” them to be passed when they weren’t voted on by ANYBODY (well, maybe not--this time). The Constitution is blatantly ignored, without even the PRETENSE of following it. If we don’t start paying attention to what they’re doing and holding them accountable, we will soon be subjects of a new dictatorship. (Just common sense)

Making It A Big Thing

The liberal media is making a “big thing” out of 1,000 total deaths in the entire Afghan operation, but completely forget that we averaged losing 416 PER DAY in World War II (Wickipedia). Not that this is a GOOD thing, but it is not nearly as bad as they like to paint it. Should we “cut and run” because we’ve taken some casualties? No. If we do, we’re going to suffer even more casualties, some of them right in your town, when the terrorists are incentivized by our cowardice in running away and intensify their actions. (Reuters)

The Way Liberals Think

They “talk down” big corporations, saying we should get rid of them all. But obviously they haven’t thought it through; big corporations are made up of PEOPLE. The people who own part of the corporation, the people who depend on it for their living, and those who depend on the products these corporations put out. They don’t think about that, nor do they care about these people. This is another cartoon that amply illustrates the way liberals think. (Candorville)

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Israel vs. Palestinians

The Palestinians like to think they have the right to land that is now Israel, due to both a League of Nations AND a United Nations mandate. I’m not sure how binding such mandates are, but the Palestinials “went to war” about it—and lost, many times. So there it is. That land belongs by right of conquest, to Israel. The Palestinians have no claim to it. But they still want it for the site of a future Palestinian State—which will never exist—in the lifetimes of those now living, at least. "Following the Holocaust, in which 6 million Jews were killed by the Nazis, pressure on Britain increased to allow Jewish immigration to Palestine. In 1947, the UN partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish states. The Arabs did not accept the partition and war broke out. The Jews won a decisive victory, expanded their state and created several hundred thousand Palestinian refugees. The Arab states refused to recognize Israel or make peace with it. Wars broke out in 1956, 1967, 1973 and 1982, and there were many terror raids and Israeli reprisals. Each side believes different versions of the same history. Each side views the conflict as wholly the fault of the other and expects an apology,” neither of which will happen." Jews and Palestinians will NEVER agree, and Joe Biden was wrong to criticize Israel for planning on using its own land to build homes for its citizens while Barack Obama was wrong to tell Joe to do it. But then, Obama has been wrong on about everything there is. (Mid East Web)

Killing Iraq

The liberals succeeded in “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory” in Viet Nam, and they’re trying their best to do the same in Iraq. The Islamic terrorists are “strapping children to the bumpers of their attack vehicles,” then whining about “all the civilian casualties.” (This is a illustration of what they’re doing, not an actuality--maybe). What they’re doing is putting civilians “out in front” in their attacks, then when civilian deaths actually (predictably) happen, they cry about it. Then our liberal fools “take up the cry,” saying “we are at fault” for ATTACKING the Islamic terrorists in RETALIATION for their attacks on us. The Denver shuttle bus driver who pleaded guilty to charges of “attempting to use WMDs” on New Yorkers blamed the US attacks in Afghanistan for his own actions, ignoring completely their own actions there, which precipitated ours. Yet many Americans, who “don’t pay attention to politics,” BELIEVE this crap. I call them “headline readers” who only read the headlines, which often are directly the opposite of the truth. This book tells you what the liberal news media won’t tell you about what happened. (Barnes & Noble)

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Republicans Support Insanity

It IS insanity to allow a person who already has an expensive malady like cancer to buy insurance that covers the cost of caring for them—AFTER the cancer has been diagnosed. This would not be “insurance.” It would be STUPIDITY for an insurance company to “buy into” such insanity. But this government wants to make a law FORCING them to do it. How STUPID is this government? They prove their stupidity in many ways. This is just one of them. They also think they can “get guns off the street” by making laws against gun ownership for most people, completely ignoring the fact (not opinion) that criminals do not obey laws. That’s the very DEFINITION of a criminal. So how do they expect him/her to obey a law that says he/she can’t be armed? What angers me is that REPUBLICANS are “buying into” the insanity of forcing insurance companies to commit economic suicide by insuring people for “pre-existing conditions.” It sounds good, if you fail to examine the inevitable RESULTS of such insanity.(Atlas Society/Larry Elder)