"Victory Is NOT the Goal"

“VICTORY IS NOT THE GOAL”: That’s what Obama says about Afghanistan and, I presume, Iraq. Which leads to the logical question, “What IS the goal? Defeat?” It certainly was during the election campaign. Is it still? What else could BE “the goal” when you’re in a war with people who want to kill you because you don’t believe the same way they do? I’ll ask again; what is this man SMOKING? He can’t be stupid enough to think there is any OTHER goal in a war but victory. The more he talks, the more he reveals his complete IGNORANCE of logic and the real world. They should really keep him away from a microphone because that’s where he reveals his abysmal IGNORANCE the most. I’ve seen presidents with whom I disagreed before (Clinton and Carter come to mind) but never one showing this much stupidity. (Just common sense)

It Won't Work

This article tells you how to “avoid” being targeted by the Obamaites when you go to a demonstration. But it won’t work. Obama will “target you” anyway. He wants people to think EVERYBODY who opposes his “health care swindle” is part of an “unruly mob” and “not indicative” of REAL Americans and what they’re thinking. For the first time, even his “captive media” are saying his health care swindle (they don’t call it that) is “in trouble.” There are even rumors that the “public option” might even be removed from the equation. If so, count on that provision to be back next year in a whole new wrapper (IF, indeed, it IS removed, not just renamed). The liberals NEVER give up and “go away.” They come back, time and again, with the same crap in a new wrapper until they “wear us down.” Obama criticized demonstrators for “yelling.” But he didn’t mention that they were yelling to be heard over the yelling of Obama’s goons in the audience. (One News Now/Michelle Malkin)

"No Death Panels"

Obama’s henchmen said there is NO “death panel” provision in any of the bills now up for consideration and said Sarah Palin "crossed the line" in mentioning them (who DREW the line?). Only problem is, there IS one in several of the bills. But then they said they “removed” the “death panel” provision that wasn’t there. Which is it?: Is it “not there?” Or have they just “removed it” from ONE bill? Sarah Palin said such a provision is nasty. I agree. Such decisions should be made by the PATIENT and/or family. Not by government. If they ever came to me to “counsel” me on my impending death, I’d throw them out THROUGH the door. (News Max)

Uncooperative Computer

I've been fighting this computer all week (and more). It's like a little kid; I tell it to do something and it doesn't. Or it does something else altogether. Or if I wait long enough, sometimes it does what I tell it. Believe me; its days on my desk are numbered. Sorry.

Kennedy Hypocrisy

It literally makes me ill to hear such as Sen. McCain and others who reviled Teddy Kennedy in life (except when they wanted something) refer to him as “The Lion of the Senate” (“Lying,” more likely) and the one “almost indispensable man” when he died. Kennedy was responsible for some of the most reprehensible legislation ever passed. He drove his car into Chappaquiddick Bay with his young, beautiful, pregnant girlfriend inside and swam away, to go back to his motel, shower, and go to bed (as if nothing had happened), leaving her to die when a simple phone call MIGHT have saved her life, if made in time. But that was not Kennedy. Maybe he felt an “out-of-wedlock birth” would ruin his career, and her death almost did. But he was wiley enough to overcome killing her and “served” for many more years, screwing up everything he touched. People say you should not “speak ill of the dead,” but being dead doesn’t make you into a saint. If you’re a jerk alive, you’re still a jerk dead. I say, good riddance. (Just common sense)

Just Shut Up!

That’s what Obama wants America to do. He’s surprised by the volume of opposition among the “grass roots” of America to ALL of his scams and swindles, especially his health care swindle and he wants us to “just shut up.” This is the way he says it:" 'But I don't want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to just get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don't mind cleaning up after them, but don't do a lot of talking.' Obama here was talking about Republicans and conservatives whom he holds responsible for the economic downturn. He doesn't want to hear from them whether about health care reform or economic policy more generally. He just wants them to shut up and get out of the way of his glorious left wing revolution." He’s still trying to blame the “economic mess” HIS people created to get him and other Democrats elected on Republicans and conservatives. He has no proof of it, but he hopes using the Nazi method (the “big lie” technique of repeating the lie over and over until it becomes truth) will work for him. Unfortunately for him, we have proof otherwise, and the means to make it public, not like in the past where he could control what people were told, absolutely. (Peter Ferrara/American Spectator)

Repeat Drunk Drivers

In Denver. Colorado, judges are divergent on whether or not to put repeat drunk drivers in jail. They give many reasons, chief of which is jail overcrowding, thinking that drunk driving is less of a crime than, say, armed robbery. But a comparison of the numbers of people killed by drunk drivers, compared to those killed by armed robbers tells me drunk driving is every bit as serious as armed robbery. Some judges think “alternative punishment” including “treatment” can be more effective than jail time. That’s a load! Ask the relatives of the two women killed on their way to Denver International Airport (DIA) by a woman with many DUIs and reckless driving charges on her record (who just kept going and was arrested after a civilian followed her) for their opinion. Ask the mother of the teenager killed at 114th and Colorado Blvd by another teen with no less than SEVEN DUIs on his record in his short life (he survived) who was running from the cops (again) for her opinion. Both have had their “hands slapped” many times. People who continue to drink and drive many times ought to be put in PRISON for a long time. Not county jails. At least they’d not kill anyone while driving drunk in THAT time. They’re KILLERS. Their cars are their weapon. (Denver Post)

Kennedy Wants What He Wants

When he wants it. In 2004, when Democrat John Kerry resigned to run for president, Kennedy was afraid the Republican governor was going to appoint a Republican to replace him. So he got a law passed to prevent it. Now Democrats are "in charge" in both Massachusetts and Washington, so he wants to change it back because he’s afraid the 60-vote majority for Democrats will “go away” when he dies. Kennedy is used to getting what he wants, and he’d rather not die. But There’s somebody with more power than he has that has decided he WILL. (Just common sense)

Making Cars You Don't Want

That’s Obama’s plan, and he’s using the “stimulus” to promote it. In this case he’s giving a lot of money to colleges so they’ll do the research that can make his dream come true whether or not the majority of Americans want it. He has vowed to “bring a gun to a knife fight” if necessary and FIGHT Americans who don’t want his socialist dreams. He ridicules people who suggest he wants socialism, but if you look closely at everything he’s doing, it PROMOTES socialist plans. Problem is, if you criticize his plans LOGICALLY he and his accomplices tell you there IS no logic (and he uses LOGIC to prove it). (Indy Star)

Obama Talks A Good Game

But he can’t seem to deliver what he promises. Is that because he promises things he KNOWS he can’t deliver and counts on people to forget he promised in the first place? He has promised so much there isn’t enough money in the world to pay for it all. So he just prints money, hoping he can get re-elected before we realize that his printing money with nothing behind it gives us such high inflation we won’t have any money left. He came back to Indiana to what used to be the biggest manufacturing area for RVs in the country (until his policies destroyed the RV business) but which now has an unemployment rate of 17%. He’s talking about how “things are getting better,” based on the fact that the national unemployment rate didn’t rise as quickly as he thought. So what he’s doing is trying to fool us again, so we keep voting he and his accomplices back into office so they can ruin our economy some more, blame it on capitalism, and con us into allowing him to continue making laws that bring us ever closer to a socialist dictatorship with him in charge. (Indy Star)

He'll Pass It Anyway

Obama doesn’t care that a majority of Americans want NO PART of his health care swindle. He hopes to pass it into law and IMPOSE it on us, anyway. Americans are “getting wise” to him and ALL his scams and swindles. It’s not just conservatives who today oppose him. Democrats and other liberals, too, are violently opposed to his attempted takeover of 1/7 (1/6?) of the American economy, even while we have no money left from his other scams to pay for it. Clinton tried it, and failed. But the liberals never learn. THEY want it, And they’re determined to impose it on us, come hell or high water. I have high hopes that America will AGAIN reject this unneeded theft of rights and money. They’ll be back again later. Liberals never give up. Defeat them a hundred times and they’ll be back next year with try 101. They hope they can “wear us down.” And they might be right. They might never get tired of trying to victimize us, but we might get tired of fighting them off. I hope I’m “six feet under” before that happens. They show their CONTEMPT for the people who elected them when they say the opposition they’re facing is “just noise” and “not representative of the American people.” They’re wrong, and the next election may well show them they are. They call the truth we tell "misinformation," but the only misinformation out there originated in Obama's office. (American Spectator)

Obama to "Fight" Americans

He says, “When they bring a knife, you bring a gun (Of course, we're not bringing a knife, we're just bringing ourselves).” This from one of the strongest anti-gun freaks in this country. Of course, he’s speaking metaphorically, though I’m sure some of his followers will take him literally. What he means is that when people oppose him, go out and intimidate them. If that doesn’t work, beat them up, then accuse them of starting it. Which, of course, is why he sent some BIG, burly union thugs to a recent “Tea Party” demonstration. When intimidation didn’t work, they were soon pushing people around and saying the people they were pushing around attacked THEM. Can you imagine a 73-year-old man who can just barely walk starting a fight with a big, burly thug? I don’t like to hear “our president” talk about “fighting” Americans to impose something we want no part of upon us. We need to get rid of this Nazi. (Rush Limbaugh)

Obama Preaching Hate

He and his accomplices say demonstrators against his policies are “preaching hate,” but in reality it is OBAMA and his people who are. At one “Tea Party” demonstration things were coming along nicely and peacefully until a bunch of Obama’s “union thugs” invaded the meeting and started intimidating people; and when that didn’t work, started actually beating on people. One thug knocked an old man down. Obama is accusing us of doing what his people are doing, then blaming it on us. It’s the old “create a problem, then “solve it” scam they’ve been using since (at least) the fifties and sixties. They CREATE violence, then send in cops and even TROOPS to “put it down. But it is never their own thugs that get arrested and charged, it is the innocent people trying to have their opinions heard. This is the same tactics Hitler used to become a dictator in Germany. They’ll accuse me of “going over the line," for writing this, completely forgetting (and hoping you’ll forget) their own references to Nazism and “swastikas” at “Tea Party” demonstrations. (Rush Limbaugh)

"America the Deadbeat"

The “cash for clunkers” is a success, according to Obama and his henchmen. I guess when you offer to give away money and people predictably line up to receive it, that can be classed as a “success” if you don’t know what you’re doing. But the biggest problem with this “give-away program” is that it leaves the auto dealers “holding the bag” waiting for the government to “get around to” paying them for the money they’ve “fronted” for Obama’s scheme. Some will no doubt go out of business because they can’t afford to “front” the money for this silly scheme to destroy thousands, even MILLIONS of perfectly good cars because of an "environmental fallacy" and will run out of money because, unlike the government, they can’t counterfeit money “legally.” The problem, of course, is “in the fine print,” which means that a lot of those dealer the dealers made in good faith will not be “approved,” after they’ve already promised to pay the money themselves. I predict that this scheme will wreak havoc with the used car business while running the price of new cars up sky high. (Just common sense)

People Just Don't Like A Black President

That’s what Janine (I think that’s how it’s spelled. everywhere I go it’s spelled differently) Garafalo says. Which causes me to ask: why then, did we (not me) elect him? Garafalo sees “racists” under every bed but her own, although the only racist in this plot is Garafalo herself. She is an idiot who thinks racism is as rampant today as it was in the fifties, though it is not. There are countless black and Hispanic mayors in office throughout the land, even in the South. There are so many black elected and appointed politicians in this country they cannot be counted. This country ELECTED a black president. How then, can this ignorant woman believe we “just don’t like having a black president?” How stupid IS this bi . . . er, uh, witch? Brace yourself: this post contains quotes from a blatantly liberal show, on which Garafalo plainly calls ALL “Teabaggers” racists and suggests the “Boston Tea Party" movement is “petering out,” (another double entendre and a lie in itself) that the “Teabaggers" know nothing about the original Boston Tea Party (actually it’s SHE who knows nothing about ANYTHING, especially about the original Boston Tea Party). This is not the first stupid comment she has made. I, personally, will not see ANY show in which she is listed as one of the players. I don't need to watch such a stupid performer do ANYTHING. (News Busters)

Why Not Just Show It?

When the first glimmerings of a controversy over whether or not Obama was born in this country came about, I wasn’t interested. I thought it was just some “far-right” “conspiracy theory” and not worth my time and effort to investigate. “Far-righters” are just as bad as “far-lefters” when it comes to creating controversies where none exist. But when Obama continued to refuse to release his REAL birth certificate, instead releasing a phony document he SAID was a birth certificate but was really not, and sued to prevent the release of his REAL birth certificate, my “hackles” went up. I wondered just WHY he didn’t want to release his real birth certificate. Is there something in there that would ruin his plans? What? Why? Obama could “put this to rest” easily by simply releasing the “real McCoy.” But he won’t. The smell of fish is very strong here. The left itself is pushing this thing, while ridiculing those who want it to happen. (NY Daily News)

Reagan on Socialized Medicine

The liberals have been trying to impose this swindle on us for many years; since way before Reagan was president. And as usual, they never give up. This is what he said then. Now they’re back with yet another “health care swindle.” If we beat them (again) this time, they’ll be back again later hoping they can “wear us down. The only way to stop them is to “vote the bastards out” in the next election, and just hope that’s soon enough. (Rush Limbaugh/Ronald Reagan)

Controlling Your Children

"Dirty secret No. 1 in Obamacare is about the government's coming into homes and usurping parental rights over child care and development. It's outlined in sections 440 and 1904 of the House bill (Page 838), under the heading 'home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children.' “ With this, their control over your children will be complete. This takes it much further than did the “Child Abuse Prevention And Treatment Act of 1974 (CAPTA),” which gave local “child abus . . . er, protectors” the INCENTIVE to interfere in your raising of your children so they could “criminalize” parents and dispense with their parental right to complain when their children are taught socialism as an ideal in school. Hitler knew if you could get to the children early, it would be easier to control them later. So does Obama. (The Patriot Post)

Do As We Say

Not as we do. That’s the message being sent by Congress after the House (led by Nancy Pelosi) approves a $250 million dollar purchase of three (count ‘em) THREE Gulfstream personal aircraft for the exclusive use of Congress (two of ‘em, anyway). This after giving auto CEOs hell for coming to Washington in their own private planes. They SAY their “excuse” was that is was “cost effective” to come in private planes, and it was. But Congress didn’t buy it. Now Congress says traveling around in THEIR private planes is “cost effective.” Which is it? Cost effective, or not? I guess it’s only “cost effective” when people in congress do it. They’re “American royalty,” you know. It would be “below their station” to fly on regular commercial airlines. (Update: That number went up to EIGHT before they "chickened out" and canceled the whole thing.) (Roll Call)

Looking For Female Politicians

That’s what they’re doing in both parties because they think females are AFRAID to get into politics because of the vicious attacks Sarah Palin has suffered (from the Democrats). I don’t think so. I think they’re looking for more female politicians like themselves; who won’t “upset the status quo” in Washington by speaking the truth and not being afraid of them. They want female politicians who will try to be liberals and try to con the public into believing they’re conservative while everything they do is liberal, as do most male Republicans today. They’re AFRAID of Sarah. They know that ANYBODY who runs as an unabashed conservative and tells the truth about what the liberals are doing to us will win in a landslide, every time. Ronald Reagan did it twice. Liberals keep referring to the eighties (when Reagan was in office) as “the decade of greed,” but they don’t know what they’re talking about. Reagan began what was the longest economic upturn in recent history by bringing the top tax rate down from 70% (70%!) to 28%, leaving potential investors in projects that create jobs with the money to operate. This gave them INCENTIVE to make those investments and that caused the economy to grow swiftly with a solid base; not like the phony base that fueled the economic upturn just before 1939 and the “Great Depression.”

This economic boom continued even after eight years of Bill Clinton’s efforts to derail it. It even survived the 4 years of the very WORST presidency in memory (Jimmy Carter). But it didn’t survive the liberals (Democrats) passing the “Citizen’s Reinvestment Act 0f 1976.” About the worst kind of government meddling in private business in memory. This legislation, passed by a Democrat-dominated Congress and signed into law by a Democrat president (Jimmy Carter) FORCED lenders to loan money to people who not only couldn’t afford to pay it back, but couldn’t even collect a 20% down payment. Their “stopgaps,” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who bought up those bad loans with taxpayer’s money until they (Democrats) “pulled the plug” just before the 2008 election, causing the economy to crash during the end of a :hated” Republican administration so they could not only get themselves elected to all three branches of government and have complete control.

It also allowed them to blame the Republicans for it. They were successful. This caused a “bloodless coup” that meant a (radical socialist) Democrat president and a Democrat majority in Congress. It also allowed them to appoint Supreme Court justices who were liberals, too (which they predictably did with Sonia Sotomayor). They are now (at this writing) in complete control in Washington and are working like beavers to gain complete control at a local level, too, with their effort to take over the medical business. I say “business” because they aren’t interested in the medical aspect, except if it hurts their control of the business side. If their bill passes, they will be able to deny lifesaving treatment for those they figure won’t last long enough to benefit from it for long, anyway. They’ll also be able to deny treatment to those who they “don’t approve of,” such as the very old, overweight, gun owners, smokers, etc.

They’ve said it, many times in the past. Now they’re trying to deny it and are accusing those of us who remember them saying it and telling people of “spreading misinformation.” Obama has even started an effort to get people to be “snitches” and tell them when they get messages (sometimes by e-mail, “under the radar”) from friends telling them the truth about Obama’s plans. He’s obviously compiling an “enemies list,” although he denies that, too. But I ask you: what else would he DO with that kind of information?” If you think he’ll just contact them and tell them “how wrong they are,” you’re naïve. I expect to hear from some of his thugs any time, now. And if they can’t “convince me I’m wrong” (which they can’t), they’ll probably just confiscate (steal) my computers and jail me on some trumped-up charges. If they succeed, soon you will be “government property” and they’ll make all your decisions for you. If you so much as complain you’ll be punished. (Just common sense)