A Pronouncement of Fools

There are many among anti-gun fools who think the Second Amendment is an “anachronism and outdated.” They say things are different today, and such an amendment is no longer needed. They’re WRONG. Yes, things are different. The government, which was not “flush with money” like they are today thought of ALL THE PEOPLE as being subject to “call up” into an “organized militia” if needed, and they wanted them to bring their own guns. But the basic reason for that amendment is self defense. Intelligent people know that the way to self defense is NOT to make yourself defenseless and beg an aggressor not to kill you. If you do, they WILL kill you. But you can’t tell the anti-gun fools that. They are BLIND to reason and logic. Some of them deny the very existence of reason and logic. The important thing to note is that the Second Amendment is NOT about guns, per se. It is about SELF DEFENSE. The Founders wanted to guarantee Americans the right to self defense, by whatever means, including arms. Even from the government, itself, if necessary. That has not changed, even though, as one ignorant congressman noted, “the government has nukes” to use on you. But there are still situations where having a gun can stop a government agency from violating the rights of an individual, as one rancher recently proved. There is also the fact of the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there to be defended against. (Just common sense)

The War's Still On

In Baltimore, MD, as in Chicago, the street gangs are engaged in a war. “Authorities” tried to get them to have a “72 hour cease fire,” but the urge to kill was just too much for some gang members, so there have been several killings that very weekend. What good they thought that would do is anybody's guess, but obviously it failed, because the guys with all the ILLEGAL guns ignored it, as they do their anti-gun laws. None of their highly-touted laws do ANYTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun violence,” but they keep making them. They also do things like this “72-hour cease fire”—which are ALSO failures. Another obvious failure anti-gun fools ignore is the fact that their “gun-free zones” are not “gun-free,” but are KILLING ZONES because those with ILLEGAL guns can be pretty sure law-abiding people will not be armed there, so they can bring their guns and kill at will. Everything they , have done so far, has been a failure. Their only accomplishment is to get law-abiding people KILLED by DISARMING them in the face of all the ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of “neer-do-wells.” Their laws DEPEND on such people, who break laws for a living, to OBEY the laws they pass and they predictably (to those with intelligence, anyway) ignore them, making them look like the FOOLS they are, and always have been. (Just common sense)

Democrats Are Loving It

After years of trying to paint Trump as a bad president while he scores more and more wins, they can now talk up the fact that his economy has “tanked,” without talking abut the virus that caused it. The rise of the Coronavirus has canceled out most of the good things Trump has done for the economy, and the Dumocrats love it. They couldn’t care less how many people die of the virus or those “underlying medical problems” as long as they can talk about how the economy tanked under Trump. It will take us years to get back where were before the virus, if we ever do. The Dumocrats care only about how they can USE this panic for their own purposes. Trump is doing a good job of dealing with it, but they still criticize his every move. They also block his every move when they can, or at least make it difficult for him to get anything done, while people die. Then they talk about how many people have died, saying nothing about how THEY caused those deaths with their meddling. (Just common sense)

He Didn't Need A Gun

Four guys threatened to come into his home and kill him and his family. When they tried, he killed them—with his bare hands. Well, one of them, anyway, and with a knife. The others are in the pokey. San Francisco “authorities” say he may “face charges” in the death of one of them. Typical SF stupidity. an unarmed man (who happened to be a MMA fighter) fights off FOUR MEN trying to rob and kill him after threatening to do so, and they want to charge HIM in the death. What FOOLS they be. Typical liberals who want ELIMINATE our right to self-defense. We need to take them out and shoot them. We need to CELEBRATE this guy, not charge him. Damned fool liberals running SF. I'm surprised they haven't run it broke, like in Detroit. (Just common sense)

"Do As We Do; It Works"

That’s what Chicago says. But it does NOT work. They have some of the tightest “anti-gun laws” in the country, coupled with one of the highest, if not THE highest gun killing rate in the nation. THIS is “what we do is working?” The people who insist on this must be having an “opium high,” because nothing could be further from the truth. And one of the “mayor hopefuls” says the way to success is to somehow FORCE the sovereign states of Indiana and Wisconsin to institute the Illinois/Chicago “victim disarmament laws” upon their citizens, even suing them, if necessary. As if one state suing another sovereign state will work. They blame it all on guns “imported from other states,” thinking that, if they can get Indiana and Wisconsin to help, they can solve the problem. The basic flaw in their plan is that none of these laws work. So FORCING them on other states will not stop anything. In addition, if they do cooperate, criminals in other states will “rush in” to fill the void. That is a given. Of course, the fact that ALL guns always “come in from elsewhere” (unless manufactured in the state) is not mentioned. (Just common sense)

The Dishonest Media

Years ago, I got into reporting about the way the press is lying to you because I could see what we have today coming. Or maybe it was already there in full force, but better hidden. Today they just don’t care any more if you know how they use the news to support a false narrative. Example: when they publish a story that tells you just the opposite of reality when they know the proof of their lie is easily available. Then they just ignore the fact they ever published a lie. There’s evidence of just that in the recent story that was all over the news that President Trump had fired FDA official Rick Bright because he was telling us about dangers associated with use of hydroxychloroquine when he was actually doing just the opposite, and it didn’t take much more than a few days for the truth to come out that Bright himself was pushing FOR the use of that drug. All by the Trump-hating media to make Trump look bad. Not only was Bright not fired for anything having to do with hydroxychloroquine, hs firing was being considered long before anybody thought about the Coronavirus. They were talking about it as far back as January 2. As usual the story they published was based on “unnamed sources.” (Red State)

Gun-Free Zones

One of the silliest ideas anti-gun fools have come up with is the “gun-free zone.” People put up signs saying, “No Guns Allowed Here” and law-breakers fill them full of bullet holes. Law-breakers SEEK OUT gun-free zones because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding people there will not be armed, because they DO obey laws, even if they know they’re stupid laws. They have to know this, but they continue to establish more and more of them, while people die there because they’re disarmed and helpless when a law-breaker brings his ILLEGAL gun there to kill a few people. So far, with one or two exceptions, ALL mass shootings have occurred IN a “gun-free zone.” A favorite place for mass shootings is a school—ALL of which are gun-free zones. But a gun-free zone has never stopped a potential mass shooter from coming in and killing a few people. So what the hell GOOD are gun-free zones? Like all the other anti-gun fool bright ideas, they just get honest people killed, because all they do is disarm the law-abiding, while the law-breakers ignore them and kill people therein. The recent shooting in Milwaukee was in a gun-free zone, surprise, surprise! (The Gun Feed)

What "Common Sense?"

The anti-gun fools like to call their unenforceable, useless, anti-gun laws “common sense laws.” But ARE they common sense? Or are they just “wishful thinking” from people who have no idea how to stop “gun crime” and want to do SOMETHING, even if it doesn’t work, that they can CLAIM is to “stop gun violence” and make themselves feel better. “Gun-free zones” are an “engraved invitation” to would-be shooters since they can be pretty sure the law-abiding there will not be armed. “Gun registries are also useless, since they do NOTHING about gun violence, and only allow the cops to (maybe) locate a shooter IF he stood for one when buying a gun LEGALLY. Criminals do not. “Safe storage” laws only serve to make the guns we have useless in defending against the holder of an ILLEGAL gun fast enough to actually do anything in self defense. All their laws are just “flailing around,” trying to find SOMETHING that will work. But as long as they concentrate on the GUN, nothing is going to work. (Just common sense)

Flynn: Democrat Victim

General Flynn ought to be lauded as a war hero and thanked profusely for his exemplary service to this nation. Instead, he has been framed into a prison term and ruined financially by the Dumocrats, for their own spurious purposes. He was “questioned” incessantly, going over the same things many times, hoping to trip him into a misstatement they could make into “a lie to the FBI so they could make an example of him and make President Trump look bad. They finally did it. They found SOMETHING they could “get him” on, and sent him to prison, the final insult just short of killing him. He is a political prisoner, and President Trump should pardon him, and tell the FBI to give him restitution financially for all they did to him. But, of course, that will ever happen. The FBI is run by entrenched bureaucrats, and if there’s one thing they’re good at, it’s stalling. The Trump-appointed director notwithstanding. The only true answer is mass firing, but that would open another “can of worms” and lawsuits. The only thing Trump can do is mitigate the damage by pardoning their victims, selectively firing specific key individuals for cause. (Legal Insurrection)

"Won't Stand Up In Court"

That’s what Washington Post thinks about Second Amendment Sanctuaries, anyway. Which leads me to ask, “What kind of legal education has the editors there taken?” None, I’d suspect. People who rise to the level of editor of a newspaper just don’t have time to get a legal education. The same people fully support “sanctuary cities” for illegal aliens. Which supports TWO crimes. Entering this country illegally and refusing to aid the legally-constituted authorities in enforcing the law. Will THAT “stand up in court?” What the Post just doesn’t understand in their ignorance is that the PEOPLE of Virginia will not stand for being completely disarmed and made to be defenseless in the face of the law-breakers’ reliance on ILLEGAL guns. They WILL revolt, as we did when King George tried it, and then it will not matter if it “stands up in court.” The fools trying to enforce unconstitutional laws will be removed from office and more intelligent people will replace them—or else. The point being that the very laws “Second Amendment Sanctuaries” oppose are unconstitutional, and will themselves ultimately “not stand up in court.” (Just common sense)

Two Diffferent Approaches

Second Amendment advocates and gun control advocates each have a different approach to reducing gun violence, according to the Daily Caller. Second Amendment advocates want to find ways to PREVENT gun violence, while gun control fools simply want more and worse gun violence they can take advantage of to coin more bucks out of it, while working to take away one of the most cherished constitutional rights we have. Which is why they always jump right on every possible instance of gun violence, even before the echos of the gunshots have dissipated. While you can still hear those echoes, they’re out soliciting more money so they can promote even more of the useless anti-gun laws that criminals IGNORE, while using their ill-gotten guns to victimize the law-abiding, who OBEY their stupid laws, even while they realize they are stupid laws. Of course, a lot of that money seems to find its way into the pockets of the anti-gun fools, usually in the form of inflated salaries and “travel assistance” so they can travel around the country in their futile quest to destroy that constitutional right. Gun control has actually become a money-grubbing scam—if it wasn’t always. (Daily Caller)

Can't Do It, Dummy!"

Some governors (and other politicians) think you can declare the Constitution invalid because they’re “doing it for good” and it’s “an emergency.” But that’s stupid thinking, and it shows who is wishing to be a dictator, at least over the tiny area they control. I’ve seen governors do it, and I’ve seen local politicians do it. And get away with it, for a while—until the Supreme Court catches up to them. Sadly, there isn’t a punishment for those politicians who violate the Constitution, other than the indignity of having their actions declared unconstitutional and reversed. Unfortunately, the supreme Court usually acts as fast as paint dries, and the damage has already been done to many people, who lose money, sometimes their businesses, or their property, even some going to prison before they act. Many politicians are right now using the pandemic panic as an excuse to violate the Constitution, with one governor blandly admitting that he didn’t even CONSIDER the Constitution when he made his rulings. That should be a criminal offense, and reason for his or her removal from office, immediately, to reduce the damage. The Michigan governor has been probably the worst offender. (Just common sense)

Another Know-Nothing Speaks

Chelsea Clinton, who knows NOTHING about guns, comes out (again) in favor of gun control after the Aurora, Illinois shooting spree that killed five, and wounded four cops. Who the hell is Chelsea to make such comments and be taken seriously, anyway? Her only “qualification” to be heard is she is the misbegotten spawn of a former president (who was impeached for lying about his sexual escapades in the White House with a young, impressionable intern), and his unindicted felon wife. If America was smart, they would never take such ignorant people seriously. This bimbo knows even less than Alexandria Oasio-Cortez, and that’s saying a lot. Yet liberals, especially, take her seriously, and revere her ignorant words as if they were “The Gospel of Bill Clinton.” She’s nothing but the spoiled child of a scurrilous scoundrel who made millions of dollars in very suspicious circumstances, AFTER he was impeached, but not convicted by a Senate, where he know where the bodies were buried, and maybe even buried a few, himself. (Just common sense)

Federal Gun Registry

“Democrats Express Openness to National Gun Registry.” No kidding. that’s what they’ve been after all along, no matter what lies they’ve told. “Democratic House Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries defended his party’s push for a universal background check bill Wednesday, claiming that any enforcement of the legislation — including federal firearm registration — will be left to the Department of Justice to decide.” And you can BET they will decide in favor of a national gun registry, even though they already have one. If anybody believes the names of people who buy a gun are not put into a database that is then “shared” with the feds, I’ve got a beautiful bridge in Brooklyn for sale. They will SAY they don’t do that, but they do. And one day we will find out they do. Whenever you buy a gun, you must “register” that sale with the local government. The locals then talk to the feds, sending the details of that sale along with the conversation. If you don’t believe the feds put that info into a database for use later, I feel sorry for you. Any information sent to the feds will be there forever. Whether or not it’s legal for them to keep it. (The Daily Caller)

Democrats Are Imbecilic

They’re giving a hard time to one of their own for telling the truth and giving credit where it belongs, to President Trump. This black female member of the Michigan legislature got the virus and was near death. President Trump suggested the use of hydroxychloroquine in her treatment and it “turned the tide” for her,. She recovered, and thanked Trump for his suggestion, which saved her life. Now her colleagues and “friends” want to censure for thanking President Trump for anything. As the writer of the American Thinker article on the subject said, this is not rational behavior. Thanking someone for saving one’s life should not be a violation making the person subject to censure and possible removal. I don’t know what they’re smoking in Michigan these days, but their dictatorial governor agrees and has made it known in snarky messages aimed at her. Someone who is slowly suffocating fro an insidious virus doesn’t care about the Dumocrat Trump hatred, She is grateful, and says so. The Dumocrats have taken Trump hatred way too far, and those practicing it should be removed for cause. What cause? Stupidity. (Just common sense)

We're Fighting Two Pandemics!

One made in communist China, hopefully by accident, the other of our own making. The second pandemic is the one that is going to END us if we don’t “wise up” and kill it off. She “Second Pandemic” is “shutting down the country” to keep people from getting close to one another. Yes, people need to practice “social distancing” while the virus is still killing people. But we should trust adults to take the proper precautions to stay alive without destroying their ability to earn a living. This virus will forever change the way we deal with one another, but we don’t need to go broke to survive it. Communist China, the original source for the virus, is not “closing down.” Oh yes, they are PRETENDING to, but just who is providing millions of face masks we are being advised to use? Who is still THE major supplier of everything? They don’t really care if millions of their people die of the virus, and they MUST go to work when their communist bosses order them to be at their benches manufacturing hundreds of items for sale as WalMart and other “big box” stores. Communist China is the biggest winner. Their economy is booming while ours is disappearing. Their time for suffering is coming, when their biggest market for everything “goes away.” But they will be big enough by then to survive, and America will be gone. (American Thinker)

Pushing A Lie

That’s what the anti-gun fools DO. They recently posted a “study” that “determined” that there was a school shooting (nearly) once a week. Of course, they included fist fights in the playground, or NEAR it. They also included shootings OUTSIDE the school grounds but within earshot. And they based their “findings” on the “school year,” not the real 12-month year. This is ample evidence of how they get their “bad-sounding” statistics. They LIE, include things that are NOT shootings, and happen not even ON school grounds, but NEAR the school. They don’t have any REAL statistics to report, so they just make it up. Meanwhile, they disarm the victims, so they will be “easy targets” for the fools who come to kill students using their ILLEGAL guns. And if anybody comes up with an idea that will actually WORK to stop school shootings (like letting the teachers bring their guns to school), they dismiss them, out of hand. They’re fools, but they “have the ear” of gullible politicians, so they can get their illogical, useless anti-gun laws on the books. Laws that only make it easier for the mass shooters to kill defenseless students and faculty. (Joe Huffman)

Millionaires Control Voting?

There needs to be some sort of a law against billionaires giving billions of dollars to one party or another, or millions to one candidate or another to sway elections their way. It is immoral for them to be allowed to spend so much money on one side or the other, and I would still be saying this is the beneficiaries were Republicans. It’s just WRONG. There ARE laws to limit the total amount of some donations for the “little guy,” but not, apparently, for the “big guy.” They get to put as much money in the hands of their favorite politicians as they want, with no limits, it seems, while us “peons” have limits. Bloomberg has pledged one BILLION dollars to be given to the Dumocrats, while George Soros wrote a check for $28 million, which makes him the piker in this scenario. Then there’s Chuckie Schumer’s Super PAC, which has come up with $70 million. President Trump is putting a lot of money in it, too. But most of it is from his supporters, mostly in small or medium donations. As this is written, he hasn’t seen fit to put a lot of his own money in the game. (Just common sense)

Not Just to Militia

Anti-gun fools try to convince us that the founders only meant to guarantee gun rights to “members of an organized militia,” so they can be free to deny them to everybody else. NOT SO. The wording is clear: “the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” NOT “The right of militia members...” At the time of the writing of the Constitution, there was no such thing as an “organized militia” in existence, and the government considered ALL THE PEOPLE to be a “militia,” subject to being “called up” when needed, and they wanted them to bring their own guns with them, since they were not “flush with money” as they are, today. To attempt to limit gun ownership to an imaginary “organized militia” is really stupid. But that has never stopped the anti-gun fools before, and it won’t, in the future. They will cling tenaciously to that faulty belief, forever. The fact is, the Constitution guarantees ALL PEOPLE the right to self defense, and to own and keep the means to that end, a gun. That’s a fact. Not subject to debate. Yet they continue to deny it, and operate as if the Constitution did not exist. ( Mercury News)

"We'd Rather Teachers Die"

That’s what they seem to be telling us with their most recent effort at making a law that might actually WORK to keep mass shooters out of their schools in Florida. They don’t want to ALLOW any teacher to bring their gun to school, so they could protect themselves and their students in case some crazy comes in to kill a few children. They think there should be NO guns carried in schools, except those carried by school resource officers (who can be easily located and “dealt with” before the killing of the children begins). School resource officers are human beings. Teachers are human beings. What is different between the two? Both are presumed to be responsible people, so why shouldn’t the teachers be ALLOWED to bring their already legally-carried guns (if they are “concealed carriers” already) to school, so a potential mass shooter cannot locate, and kill ALL the gun carriers in the school BEFORE the killing of the children begins, since he will not be able to identify them? All their ideas still seem to be silly and unenforceable. But they haven’t clue to that. They keep doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result. Idiocy. (Tallahassee Democrat)