A Bad Idea

Peeing on the dead bodies of our enemies is a bad idea. Those Marines who did it should be punished at a company level. This action should NOT concern the Secretary of State to the point where she goes on television to revile it. It should NOT generate all the hooraw it has, including publishing an “official” statement from the Taliban saying it was a “despicable act.” They are EXPERTS on what constitutes a “despicable act,” because they commit them daily. Another bad idea is having “talks” with the Taliban or any other Islamic terrorist organization. All they want; their SINGLE goal in LIFE is to kill ANYBODY who doesn’t believe EXACTLY the same way they do. To win it, they will lie, cheat, steal, and kill ANYBODY, including their own children. When it comes to “despicable acts,” they have NO room to talk and talking to them is futile.

The only way to deal with them is KILL them whenever and wherever we find them, in any way we can. Peeing on their dead bodies wastes the time we could be devoting to hunting down and killing more of them. Allen West, a former Lt. Col. who has seen action in the Army says this: “The Marines were wrong. Give them a maximum punishment under field grade level Article 15 (non-judicial punishment), place a General Officer level letter of reprimand in their personnel file, and have them in full dress uniform stand before their Battalion, each personally apologize to God, Country, and Corps videotaped and conclude by singing the full US Marine Corps Hymn without a teleprompter. As for everyone else, unless you have been shot at by the Taliban, shut your mouth, war is hell.” I agree with that, wholeheartedly. (Right Face)

EEOC Says "It MIGHT" Violate the Law

What? “MIGHT?” What happened to “DOES?” If they’re going to send out a letter warning people that to require a high school diploma IS in violation of the law, okay. But MIGHT? Why not wait until they’re SURE? What fool at the EEOC authorized the sending of this letter? If it MIGHT violate the law, what’s the purpose of this letter? To INTIMIDATE those who can hire people and create jobs; that’s what. If they don’t KNOW it violates the law, sending such a letter is NOTHING but intimidation. (Washington Times)

I Feel Sorry for Debbie

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chair of the Democrat Party, has got to stand up for Obama, which is an impossible job in the circumstances. He has ruined our economy and continues to do so, making it worse every day. But the lies she’s told eclipse even Obama’s. She even blames the shooting that almost killed a Democrat congresswoman on the Tea Parties. I’d like to see the logic of her reasoning on that, but I don’t believe she has any. I thing she just “pulled that out of the air” to support her other lies. Pat Gray, on the Glenn Beck show, called her a “vile, horrible, heinous skank.” This would ordinarily be a “bit much,” but in her case, it’s “too little, too late.” This woman should be run out of the Democrat party. She’s the best thing that ever happened to the GOP. (Glenn Beck)

NBC's Andrea Mitchell Racist

She accuses the American people of “being too white” to re-elect Obama, completely ignoring the fact that he has spent more of our money than there IS, almost destroyed this economy to get elected and worked hard to make it worse since he WAS elected, and worked hard to make this into “The Union of Soviet Socialist America.” To her and other racists, there is no other reason not to re-elect this fool except for the color of his skin. That’s how “closeted” racists work. They accuse others of racism because they can’t find any other reason to get rid of a fool except he’s black. In reality it is the RACISTS who can’t find the reason. (Breitbart TV)

Abortion is Murder!

No matter what pro-abortionists say, abortion stops a beating heart in a person too young to fight back. One too young to have ever even experienced life. It is INFANTICIDE, and the good thing about it is that the most babies who are murdered would have become sniveling liberals. Moreover, liberals are reducing their own numbers in the future by killing off their children. They even hate the name “abortion,” which is the proper name for what they do, besides murder. Now they insist their crime be called “pro-choice,” which. Like in George Orwell’s book, “1984,” was called just the opposite of what it was (govspeak), to keep many people from even understanding they are committing murder. I refuse to obey their commands to use that "govspeak."

Some doctors, who specialize in this brand of murder, kill thousands of babies every year. The doctors in the linked story kept a lot of the tiny corpses in a freezer for some reason, and when they started one abortion in one state, to be completed in another, they were caught with those tiny corpses and rightfully charged with mass murder. They’ll probably beat the charge because the government APPROVES of infanticide. But this does serve to illustrate the problem. I am not what abortionists call an "anti-abortion fanatic." I am simply a person who LOGICALLY sees what is in front of his eyes as what it is. And abortion IS murder. It does NOT involve the "right" of a woman to control what happens to her own body as prostitution laws do, but it DOES involve the right of that infant to LIVE. (American Thinker)

"Pistol Packin' Mama" Kills Robber

In Philadelphia, a 19-year-old man assaulted his last victim when the victim’s mother came out packing a gun and killed him while he was pistol-whipping her son. Her gun was legally registered and the cops have (so far) not attempted to arrest her for killing that robber although that doesn’t rule out the robber’s family suing her for killing him. It wasn’t a “wrongful death,” but they’ll probably try and call it that in an attempt to punish this woman for defending her son from their predator relative. I guess they’ll figure if the dead kid couldn’t get money out of her son with HIS gun, they’ll do it in court. (KSEE 24)

"Living in Peace" With Islamic Extremists

Liberals who are stupid (a repetition, that) think we can “live in peace” with Islamic extremists, who only want to KILL everybody who doesn’t believe EXACTLY the same way they do. Yes, there ARE Muslims who aren’t that extreme. But they are apparently few and far between and afraid to speak out, and the only ones who concern me are the extremists who want to KILL us. We CANNOT “live in peace” with them, no more than THEY can “live in peace” with Jews, whom they hate even more than they do Christians or members of ANY other religion. There is only one way to deal with Muslim extremists; that’s to kill them before they can kill us. Then we can “live in peace” with their bodies. (Andrew G. Boston/American Thinker)

We're Broke? Spend More Money!

That appears to be Obama’s only answer to everything. Businesses are going broke? Give them money to spend! Governments are broke? Give ‘em more money. WE’RE broke? Spend more imaginary money we don’t have. Print, print, PRINT money so we can spend, spend, SPEND! What the hell is WRONG with this jerk? You can’t spend your way out of debt. But he apparently thinks we can. What this does is illustrate his INCOMPETENCE, if it needed further illustrating. Re-elect this fool and you will suffer. The problem is, so will I, and I have no plans to vote for him, ever. (American Thinker/Rick Moran)

Illegally Appointed Director "Goes to Work"

He was illegally appointed as a “recess appointment” while Congress was still in session (I don’t know if there is a penalty for Obama in doing that, but I am not holding my breath until someone in Washington finds the backbone to call him on it). “President Barack Obama named [Richard] Cordray, 52, as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in a recess appointment during a visit last week to suburban Cleveland. Republicans critical of the new agency had managed to block the appointment since July, saying the agency has too much power with too little input from Congress. Despite Cordray's background of bipartisan appeal, Senate Republicans blocked his confirmation in December.” Obama says, “If Congress won’t do their job, I’ll do it without them.” Since when is disagreeing with the president and blocking him “not doing their job?” What a FOOL this president is if he thinks the American people will buy this bullsh-t. (Breitbart)

How Tea Parties and OWS Differ

How many cops got stabbed at tea party events? And how many ambulances trying to take that stabbed cop were blocked at Tea Party events? OWS protesters have amply shown that all they want to do is make trouble for as many people who don’t believe the same way they do as they can. The only difference is that they don’t (yet) actively want to kill them, as Islamic extremists do. All the OWS demands boil down to one thing: they want a “free ride” at somebody else’s expense. Tea party people simply want the government OUT of their lives. They want less government, lower taxes, and for the government to get out of their way and let them make THEIR OWN way. They don’t want “hand-outs” as the OWS people do. They just want to be left alone. And they don’t want to irritate and hurt people to do it. (The Blaze)

Soldiers Died Because of Stupid "Rules of Engagement"

Those “rules of engagement” are “politically correct” and could have been written by “Code Pink.” One is that no return fire is allowed unless you’re SURE there is NO POSSIBILITY that innocent civilians are in the area. The terrorists know this and make SURE innocent civilians are in the line of fire when they attack. Thus they’re able to easily kill hamstrung soldiers. Obama and his pals are wantonly KILLING American troops with their STUPID “rules of engagement.” And they don’t care, as most liberals don’t care about the deadly results of their policies. (New York Post)

No wonder We're Losing the PR War

The "key moderator" in the Taliban-US talks is a Jew-hating radical Muslim Sheik who has no wish for those talks to be successful (to the U. S.). I’ve said all along that any talks between us and the Islamic terrorists is simply to give those terrorists more time to get their plans made and in readiness to kill more Americans, and it looks like I’m right, seeing who is the main moderator. (IPT Blog)

Obama Goes "Hog-Wild"

This is how an elected leader becomes a dictator. By ignoring the “rule of law” little by little until HE is the only SOURCE of law. Then he becomes a dictator. That’s how Adolph Hitler did it in Germany. First he got himself elected Chancellor, then he created situations in which (according to him alone) required “unilateral action” without asking permission of the Parliament. Replace the word Parliament with the word Congress and the constitution, and that’s EXACTLY what Obama is doing. Watch: soon he will say he “needs another term” to complete his plans for us (Which include making this country into the Union of Soviet Socialist America), and will introduce a law to make it happen. It will be written in such a way that he will never again have to stand for re-election (But you will have to pass the law to find out what’s in it a la Nancy Peelosi) and will be “president for life.” Watch for it. It is going to happen if we don’t wake up and get rid of this FOOL. (CNS News)

Slanted Polls

Just as I’ve always said, “polls” are merely a means to make the citizenry think what you want them to think, and no one really knows how they’re compiled. The latest evidence of this is the “poll” that says the most popular people in the land are Obama and Hillary Clinton. How they ever arrived at that with Obama’s REAL popularity at an all-time LOW is beyond me. Naturally this is a USA today sponsored poll. USA today is NOT the most NEUTRAL of sources. This is an obvious attempt to use a poll to create the façade of popularity for a very UN-popular president while lifting an unpopular Secretary of State’s popularity in case she is needed to win the election. Notice also the announcing agency is the Huffington Post, one of the most liberal blogs in existence. (Huffington Post)

Warning From A Muslim

He says he is a “former Muslim” after finding that Islam is a “sick, evil religion.” But what he says at the end of this missive makes me think he is not a “former” Muslim. The Koran (however they spell it this week) tells Muslims it is okay to LIE to Infidels and I think this man is lying when he says he is a “former” Muslim. He asks: “Do you have enough bullets to kill us all?” My answer: “If we don’t, we will MAKE enough bullets and spend the rest of our lives killing Islamic extremists who try to kill us for not believing exactly the same way they do.” He says, “We will use your own kindness against you.” And, in a demonstration of his lack of education, he ends it with this message: “You are destined to loose.” Otherwise he tells the truth about how they plan on overtaking us. It will take a while, but they are well on their way to success because of the ignorant liberals running things in this country. (SIOTW)

OWS Wants Socialism!

Which puts them squarely in Obama's camp. When will these dolts LEARN? Socialism has been tried, time and time again, and has eventually failed every time. Yes, there are a FEW socialist countries still in existence, being “propped up” by other socialist regimes that still have some of their subjects’ money left. Soon they all will be gone, and Cuba will be one of the first, since no other socialist country still rich on their subjects’ money is propping them up after Russia’s socialist (communist) government collapsed. Socialism is just one form of collectivism, which ALWAYS inhibits INCENTIVE by stealing the “goodies” earned by production and giving them to those who do NOT produce anything. Obama says “WE” no longer “sell America,” when it is HIM who is constantly running us down. What a DOLT this man is to believe WE will believe his crap again! (Just common sense)

Throwing Out the Baby With the Bath Water

That’s what Obama and his illegitimate government is doing with the “Stop Online Piracy Act” (SOPA). Yes, there is a problem with online piracy, coming principally from communist China, but the answer is NOT to stop Internet users from linking to other sites, as this law does. Linking to other sites allows writers to refer their readers to the sources for their opinions and actually ENHANCES the activity for the other site, since not only their writings, but their ads are seen. The WHOLE IDEA of having a web site is to “get hits” and have your writing and other content seen by as many people as possible. Linking to it does that, and the site owners welcome it. This is NOT plagiarism, as Obama claims. But will this fact stop him? Probably not, unless sufficient pressure can be brought to bear. He isn’t concerned with logic and truth. Only his own opinion and ideas concern him and he dearly wishes for a way to shut bloggers up, which this law will do. It won’t shut ME up, at least until I’ve had my say. Then he will no doubt pit me in prison for saying it, regardless of the First Amendment to the Constitution if the United States. (The Heritage Foundation)

Ex-Cop Marine "Deals With" OWS Protester

There ARE no “ex-Marines.” Only Marines no longer serving actively. This protester only got a few words out at the swearing-in of U. S. Rep Bob Turner (the man elected to replace the disgraced “weenie-wagging” FORMER congressman Weiner. The Marine ex-cop said, “There’s a time and place for free speech and this is not it.” He’s right: disrupting a solemn occasion like this is NOT “free speech.” There should be more people like this Marine to “deal with” the stupid people in the “Occupy Everywhere” movement. All they want anyway is a “free ride.” (New York Post)

"Pressing Ahead Without Congress"

That’s what our new dictator Barack Obama says he’s going to do. Does he really think he’s going to get away with that? He’s not really “all-powerful,” but he thinks he is. The Constitution does not ALLOW him to "proceed without Congress." To do so is to violate the basic law of the land. I’m looking forward to the time when he not only exceeds his constitutional authority, but exceeds it in criminal fashion, so we can not only get RID of him, but put him in PRISON, too (if anybody has the guts to do so). “Pressing ahead without Congress” is not something a chief of state in this country can do. Congress is an EQUAL partner in governing this nation. The president is NOT superior to Congress, and he needs to learn that, or be gone. (Mail.com)

So What? It's Not Your Business!

Rihanna smokes. So what? It’s nobody’s business but hers if she does. If I still smoked and someone came up to me and gave me a hard time about it, I’d tell him the same thing: “butt out of my business!” Liberals think they have the right to judge everybody else, but they don’t want us to be “judgmental” of them. It’s the typical “double standard” liberals apply to everything. It’s okay for US to do it, but not for you. Liberal lawmakers regularly make laws for US, while exempting themselves. Like that law that makes it LEGAL to do “insider trading” if you’re a member of Congress while putting us “peons” in prison for doing the same thing. (The Daily Mail)