Using the Oil Spill

Obama and the other radical socialist liberals now in office hate the idea of us actually drilling for the oil WE own, in areas where we run things. The liberal media is all over this oil spill thing, pushing for us to stop ALL oil drilling in areas we control. They don’t bother to think about how much it’s costing us to be dependent on oil coming from people who hate our guts, never mind that oil is at the bottom of ALL our prosperity. Oil spills happen. That’s life. Oil leaks out into the ocean all the time whether we drill or not. We just have to deal with it. We don’t want to “throw the baby out with the bath water” and ban ALL offshore oil drilling. That’s patent STUPIDITY. But nobody (with any intelligence at all) has ever accused the liberals of not being stupid. (Media Research Center)

Typical Doonesbury

He’s still harping on the “Tea Parties” thing. This time he’s intimating they know nothing of history while the left does. Completely opposite from reality. Of course, reality is something far away from Doonesbury. He can’t take reality, which is one reason he lies all the time. The liberals can always rely on him to lie for them. (Doonesbury)

Robin Hood's "Bad Rap"

Robin Hood has always been painted as “robbing the rich to give to the poor” but that is wrong. He robbed the GOVERNMENT rich, who GOT rich by plundering the poor, and gave it BACK to the poor. They never talk about that part of it. They want to make being RICH a crime. Forget that the “rich” in the piece were the king and his local sheriff, who got rich by being the GOVERNMENT, and by TAXING the people unmercifully. The idea that Robin Hood and Che Guevera have something in common is absurd! Guevara is the EQUIVILANT of the king and his sheriff! He never tried to do ANYTHING for the “peasants.” He was the “pillager” in Cuba. The equivalent of the king in this country now is Obama, who is quickly robbing this country of all its money and all the power to control “the peasants” there is. We need to start realizing this and GET RID OF HIM! (Media Research Center)

"You've Made Enough Money"

Obama says, “at a certain point, you’ve made enough money.” Which begs the question: “Who gets to decide how much money that is? Who gets to SET that point?” I don’t think a man who only MADE a lot of money by looting Americans should GET to decide how much is too much. Maybe we ought to ask him if HE has "made enough money." Obama likes to take in just a little too much territory. Territory a president shouldn’t be able to run. If I’m able to EARN BILLIONS of dollars, it’s nobody’s business but mine. Gawd, this man is STUPID! (Real Clear Politics)

Just Ban It!

People are talking about banning gambling. They bring up many good-sounding statistics to support it, such as “crime increased 400% in one area that allowed gambling. Forgetting that gambling brought a lot more people to an area where previously very few people lived. They falsely attributed the rise in crime to gambling, not the influx of people. But you can’t “just ban” things that are bad for people. People need to be able to make their own decisions about things. They’re adults and nobody has the right to ban ANYTHING for an adult. Banning things just drives it underground and creates a lot of new criminals where they aren’t needed. It also creates another big bureaucracy where THAT is not needed. But that’s what liberals are after. As much CONTROL over as many things as possible. Control is the thing that liberals “get off on.” (John Stossel/Town Hall)

Typical Twisting of the Facts

This Doonesbury strip is a graphic example of how liberals twist the facts to suit themselves. Doonesbury once said, ”I’m a cartoonist. I don’t have to tell the truth.” And he certainly is not telling the truth here. He makes it sound like nasty politics BEGAN with Newt Gingrich. The truth is, it has existed ALWAYS. And Democrats are the ones who wrote the “manifesto” on dirty politics. Words like sick, disgrace, corrupt, cheat, decay, pathetic, radical, traitor, greed, and anti-family actually DESCRIBE the Democrats and their policies. And Newt Gingrich didn’t invent them. But Doonesbury wants us to think otherwise, so he lies again in this strip. (Doonesbury)

"Offended" By Christian Symbols

Many atheists want to get rid of EVERY vestige of religion in this country. They want to ELIMINATE Christmas displays of the Virgin Mary and Jesus on government property at Christmas time. They think the Constitution bans religion from anything government. It doesn’t. What it DOES do is keep the GOVERNMENT from dictating religion FOR you. That’s ALL it does. I’m not an atheist. I DO believe in a superior being, an intelligence that orders this universe, and which CREATED it in all its complicated glory. I'd be a FOOL to think otherwise. But my idea of what form this intelligence takes might be a bit different from that of adherents to various religions. But I don’t get “offended” when I see a symbol of somebody’s religion. It’s not my place to BE offended by such. The story linked below is about Christian symbols being banned from a CHRISTIAN church for fear of “offending” somebody. Last I heard there is no constitutional protection against being “offended.” I offend liberals every day. It’s what I DO. If it were illegal, I’d be in “deep doo-doo.” Nasty break. (Moonbattery)

Typical Liberal Slur

Sarah Palin scares the hell out of liberals, so they pile slur upon slur on her, hoping, by simple repetition, to discredit her. The only problem is, they have discredited themselves. Liberal Salon editor Joan Walsh, who herself called opposition to Obama’s policies “un-American,” chided Sarah for her criticisms, calling HER “un-American.” These people have no memories, or think WE don’t. they can’t remember the lies they told in the past, so they criticize other people for the same things they said in the past, when those things, when applied to Obama are NOT lies. Wait until Sarah is president. They’ll be hysterical. (Media Research Center)

SWAT Against "Tea Party Terrorism"

Obama called out SWAT to “keep order” when the Tea Party came to town. They didn’t find any violence, but they created some when they started pushing around the peaceful Americans who were only there to have what they wanted to say heard. Not that anybody was listening. Obama and his accomplices aren’t interested in what the American people have to say. They’re only interested in shutting them up. If they can’t do it with union thugs they’ll do it with SWAT thugs (jack-booted thugs) who are used to people doing what they say or they get beaten up and taken to jail. Watch what’s happening here, folks. It’s only going to get worse, the longer Obama is in charge. Soon we’re going to be a dictatorship with Obama in charge. (Breitbart’s Big Government)

Liberals Terrified of "Tea Parties"

Which is why they want to “dismantle them.” If they were not effective, they’d just ignore them and go on their way like they do when they’re opposed by an organization that means nothing to them. But the “Tea Parties” terrify them, so they’re doing everything they can to do away with them so they won’t remove their politicians (and thus their bureaucrats) from power in the next (2010) election. But it’s not going to work. We’re “wise to them” and can tell people what they’ll try, almost before they even try it. The Internet allows people to keep a lot better informed than they have ever been when the three major networks had a monopoly on what gets in the news. (Fox News)

Stupid Liberals

“Isn’t that a little harsh?” some people would ask. Not at all. Liberal school authorities sent five boys home for “offending” Mexican (illegal alien) students by having the temerity to wear shirts emblazoned with (gasp!) AMERICAN flags (in AMERICA!) and refusing to turn them inside out on demand. Liberals are the ones who want to ELIMINATE keeping score from sports games so the losers will not “feel bad.” That this would prevent the kids from being prepared for LIFE doesn’t seem to occur to them. Liberals think the way to self defense is to DISARM yourself in the face of danger to “prove to the bad guys you aren’t a threat.” They’re the ones who want to teach kids half the time in Spanish to “cater” to illegal aliens and even LEGAL aliens who refuse to assimilate. Liberals think WE started the WAR we’re now fighting (which they won’t even call a war or name our enemy) with Islamic terrorists by our actions against THEM. They forget entirely that Islamic extremists have been wantonly attacking us for centuries. I could write an entire BOOK just LISTING the ways liberals are stupid, but I won’t. I think I’ve made my point. (Just common sense)

Global Warming?

I don’t think so. The ice in the Arctic is at a ten-year high. Yet AlGore’s dupes (including Barack Obama) are still lying to us, telling us the ice floes are melting. Global warming (now renamed “climate change” so they can now claim that ANY drastic change in the climate is man-made). is a con; one of the biggest cons going, and it has made AlGore a billionaire. Obama has ”bought it” because it can mean a lot more money for him to control, along with being able to get rid of more people’s rights, “to fight climate change, ya know. It’s the second-most lucrative swindle going, right behind Obama’s health care swindle.” (World Net Daily)

Another Rat Flees Sinking Ship

Rep. David Obey, powerful Democrat and chairman of the House appropriations Committee, intends to retire at the end of this term. Apparently he doesn’t want to “go away a loser” as he will if he tries to get re-elected after Obama destroyed his chances of being elected even dog catcher in 2010. He knows if he loses an election his job chances later are slim. But if he “retires” while still in office he can get a better-paying job—and he knows he has little or no chance of getting re-elected. So like many Democrats, he is “retiring” before we can “fire” him. (News Max)

"Romney/Palin in 2012?

I think not. It’s time the Republicans recognized the treasure they’ve got in Sarah Palin instead of fearing that she will stop them from running for president. It's time they quit running all the "old guard" who cannot win, just because it's "his turn." The Democrats have told us in no uncertain terms who THEY think has the best chance of unseating that free-spending con man now holding down that seat by insulting her and claiming she is a “know-nothing” backwoods politician. To have her running on the ticket as “second banana” again is useless. Nobody wants Romney. They want SARAH. If Romney’s even on the ticket it should be in “second place,” with Sarah being able to say what SHE wants to say, not what Romney or any other hack politician wants her to say. She has EARNED the right to run for president in her own right. Romney is responsible for the government-run insurance in Massachusetts. that alone should eliminate him from presidential consideration. (World Net Daily)

Make It Retroactive

Obama wants to pass a law lifting the $75 million (Billion? I can't keep track these days) “cap” on how much you can get by suing British Petroleum for damages suffered as a result of their oil leakage into the Gulf of Mexico and making it “RETROACTIVE” to BEFORE the oil spill. Never mind the Constitution PROHIBITS retroactive laws. Obama doesn’t care about that. This government has been making retroactive laws for a long time and NOBODY has done anything about it. He has the armed might to make it stick, so long as nobody with the power to oppose him does anything about his excesses. So he does what he wants, just like any other dictator. (Business Week)

The "Only Non-Partisan Network"

That’s what CNN claims to be, ignoring completely their OBVIOUS bias to the left, while Fox News tells BOTH SIDES. Fox probably has more liberal staffers than any other network out there. What CNN objects to is the fact that they have just as many who AREN’T liberal, and who do a good job of presenting the TRUTH to their viewers, which number a lot MORE than those watching CNN because people are tired of watching and listening to that liberal drivel. This is an OUTRAGEOUS CLAIM and easily disproved. Do they really expect people to believe their obvious lies? Yes, Fox is not "unbiased" in their clearly labeled commentary. They're "biased" in favor of the TRUTH. CNN has no such bias. They're biased in favor of liberal lies. (News Busters)

Destroying Their Ability

The United States government destroyed their ability to control our borders when they conspired with a Mexican drug smuggler to put two Border Patrol agents in PRISON for doing their jobs. George Bush conspired with them by refusing to give these men a full pardon. They SAY they’ve DOUBLED the size of the Border Patrol since then, but I don’t know how. I hear it has been almost impossible to GIVE AWAY those jobs after the treatment they gave these two men for doing their jobs. I would certainly not take a job doing a job for which I could wind up in prison for doing. (Just common sense)

Media Twisting Tea Parties

As I’m sure what media there was in British America when the original Tea Party was held over a three cent tax on tea. They say Tea Partiers are holding up “offensive signs” and making offensive statements. What they don’t tell you is that those “offensive signs” contain the word “love” and a big heart. When pressed, they cannot give you a better example of an “offensive sign” that was actually AT a Tea Party event. This is common. Liberals cite “offensive” things that do not exist, while DEFINING things as “offensive. They would probably define this item as “offensive,” since it tells the truth about them. (News Busters)

"I Don't Have To Tell The Truth"

That’s what Doonesbury once said when somebody questioned the veracity of one of his politically-based cartoons. He’s held to that ever since, and he never misses an excuse to show what a FOOL he is. In this strip he makes believe Sarah Palin “blabbers on,” making no sense at all, ignoring the fact that it is HIM making no sense. He intimates she is a “know-nothing,”: while he, himself, knows LESS than nothing. Like most liberals, he is TERRIFIED that Sarah will “eat his lunch” in the 2012 elections. I agree with him. She will if she runs as an unashamed conservative and continues making SENSE, as Reagan did, TWICE. He even figured out a way to make a pretty woman ugly and confused. (Doonesbury)

Tea Partiers Richer

So what? Tea Party people are made up mostly of people who EARN their way and don’t ask (demand) others pay their way while they “laze around” and smoke dope (not ALL of them, but many of them). They’re GOING to be “richer” than most who do not. They're usually better educated, too. This is not something to be ashamed of. The only people who think it is, are those who want others to support them. Gimme a break! (Fox News)