Complete. Total. Stupidity

Defunding the police. Disbanding the police. What kind of dumb fool wants to get rid of the very people who “put a lid on violent crime” and keep it from taking us over? Just because there are a few damned fools who do fool things? Yes, kneeling for more than eight minutes on a man’s neck was a fool thing to do and was a textbook example of police brutality. But the vast majority of cops aren’t like that. Only a few. So why punish ALL of them? And yourselves? Because that’s what you will be doing if you get rid of the cops. That’s like disbanding the military and letting whomever wants to just come in and take us over. And that’s what you’ll be doing to your “army” if you disband the cops. You would be inviting the robbers, murderers, rapists, and all other law breakers to “come and victimize us.” And victimize us they would, with abandon, as they have proven with their riots of the last few days. They will come in force and take anything they want, because they will not have to fear being called to account for their crimes, with no cops. Politicians who support this idea are incompetent, and it is their policies that have caused the problem. Find me a city run by conservative politicians that have similar problems on a regular basis. And get rid of the one that paid thousands of dollars of other people’s money to write “Black Lives Matter” in four-foot letters in the street not far from the White House. (Just common sense)

"Not Obama's America"

Iran seriously underestimated us when they sent in their phony “militia” members to “storm” the American Embassy. They remember the insipid response to the Benghazi invasion of our embassy there, and think they can get away with attacking this embassy. They are going to learn very fast that President Trump is NOT the same kind of man that Obama was. They will pay a heavy price. Guaranteed. Reinforcements are on the way, and I doubt they will be using rubber bullets. Embassies are supposed to be “safe spaces” where our representatives can work for us and not worry about people wanting to hurt our people. Attacking our embassies is something doomed to failure with somebody like Trump in the White House. And it’s a scurrilous act. We are within our rights to use deadly force, and we will. Count on it. Those fools attacking our embassy think they are protected from deadly force by public opinion, but they’re not. Not after what the same kind of people did at Benghazi. We will not stand for another ambassador being murdered by a bunch of fools. Liberal fools are taunting Trump, saying, “Here’s your Benghazi.” But this is not, and will not be, anything like Obama’s wimp response and then lies he and Hillary told about it. The people attacking that embassy WILL pay, and pay heavily for that attack. Not like Benghazi, where a REPORTER was able to interview one of the leaders of the attack when Obama’s people couldn’t seem to find any of them. (Western Journal)

Parkland Father Removed

Nancy Peelosi’s guest, Fred Gutenberg, father of one of the Parkland School killings got himself thrown out of the State of the Union speech when he disrupted the proceedings. Ever since that killing, he has been an anti-gun fool, thinking wrongly that banning guns will save the lives of other students. It will NOT. I seriously doubt any anti-gun fool law would have stopped the killer at the Parkland School from getting his guns, illegally, if he can’t get them legally. NO anti-gun law has ever stopped a single gun crime, and never will, because the people who use guns to victimize people do not obey laws—ANY laws. Not just anti-gun laws. I think it’s instructive that politicians immediately moved to keep licensed concealed carriers from bringing their guns to church after one used his gun to save lives in that Texas church. A stupid response, to be sure. But you can’t tell these bozos that their idea of what to do to stop gun killings is stupid. They’re too stupid to realize how stupid they are. Gutenberg thinks the laws he is promoting would have protected his daughter, and he’s WRONG. Anti-gun fools criticize us for “doing nothing” about gun control. But I ask them, what SHOULD we do? They have no answer, except to criticize us again. (ABC News)

Who The Hell Cares?

Mitt Romney and George Bush (Not true. False news) have told us they will not support the re-election of President Trump. Who the hell cares what this loser does? I’ve always thought Romney is a fool and now he proves it. Trump doesn’t NEED the support of such losers to get re-elected, considering the good things he has done for this country, and in spite of one bad decision—the decision to “close the country” to “flatten the curve” of the Coronavirus. Which as, in my opinion, a cure worse than the disease—but that’s something to be debated among people smarter than In am. And he’s doing his best to reverse the effect of that decision. He is a man, after all, who admits when he’s wrong and tries his best to correct things. The people who count—and that’s not the liberal Dumbocrats—know what he has done, and support him fully. They were enough to get him elected in the first place, and they will be enough to get him re-elected, in spite of the childish antics of the Dumbocrats. There are way too many fools out there who have no idea what a gem they have in the White House. But not enough to elect that senile old fool the Dumbocrats have put up, for lack of anyone better. (Just common sense)

"It's A Kangaroo Court"

Nancy Peelosi, the “tearer-upper” said, after her impeachment hopes were dashed in the Senate, that the Senate action was a “kangaroo court and the acquittal was meaningless.” That sounds just like a five-year-old who didn’t get his way. It’s childish and petty, and has no business being practiced by the Speaker of the House. Actually, the House action was the “kangaroo court” in this plot, and the Senate “fixed it.” Somebody needs to take Peelosi aside and explain to her the facts of life. That Presents no evidence, of course. President Trump is winning, and there’s nothing she can do about it. Declaring the acquittal “meaningless” IS meaningless. Her tantrum didn’t mean a thing. She cannot reverse the acquittal. As long as she is the House Speaker she can sponsor more impeachments, which will also be rejected, after she spends more millions in her futile attempts to get rid of the single best president we have ever had. Somebody needs to find a way to stop this petty fool from spending millions of dollars that are not hers on her petty actions and send her home to walk the sh-t-filled streets of San Francisco, from whence she came. (Just common sense)

"Gun Control Hero"

As pro-gun people, we have many real heroes, one of the most recent being the guy who brought his gun to church in Fort Worth, Texas and killed a would-be mass killer before he could kill dozens of unarmed, defenseless people. Anti-gun fools confidently tell us a “good guy with a gun” cannot ever save lives, but that’s a damned lie. They do it, every day, but the liberal, anti-gun fool media ignores it, hoping we will not notice. But are there any real “anti-gun heroes?” Have anti-gun laws EVER saved a life, as legal gun-wielding folks have, on a regular basis? Anti-gun fools count former NY Mayor Bloomberg as a hero, discounting the many people who have died because of the anti-gun laws he has promoted and seen passed. But is he a hero? Not even! He’s a fool who isn’t intelligent enough to know that what he proposes does NOT “save lives,” and only TAKES lives by disarming good people, making them defenseless in the face of the ILLEGAL guns in the hands of the law-breakers. The blood of these good people is on his hands. That makes him the same thing as a mass murderer, and he should be in prison, not enjoying his $billions and lecturing people more intelligent than he is on “gun control.” One fool wrote, “How many people must die before you give up your guns?” And one wag made a reply I can’t include here, but it’s priceless. (Reddit)

Ratio: 800 to 4

In Minneapolis there are 800 cops. One of them is a plain murderer who knelt with his knee on a petty criminal’s neck until he was dead. Three other cops (rookies) stood around and let it happen. Maybe they knew what the outcome would be, and maybe they didn’t. But they will be punished, nevertheless, as will that ONE cop who knowingly murdered that petty criminal—who should not have been executed for passing a (maybe) counterfeit $20 bill. But is that a good reason to punish 796 other cops, many of whom are good people doing a hard, thankless job, while being threatened by the thugs they hunt, every day? Thugs who would just as soon kill them as look at them? And often do? What about the citizens of Minneapolis, who depend on those cops to keep crime and criminals under control? Who would then become the prime targets for those criminals, who are only being held back a bit by the cops? When you’re approached by a man with a gun who wants to shoot you, and you have a gun in your hand, do you shoot him, or do you shoot him before he can shoot you? The damned fools who want to disband the police forces of this country are facing that very decision, on a grander scale. It’s either surrender to the criminals, or maintain your defense against them—which is the police force. Without the police, you are defenseless, and you WILL “go down.” It’s as simple as that. don’t “throw out the baby with the bath water.” (Just common sense)

"Trump's A Threat"

That’s what most Dumbocrats say, and at least ONE Republican. Joe Walsh, nominally a Republican who acts like a dedicated Dumbocrat, dropped his bid for the presidency immediately after discovering there was NO market for his type of Republicanism. In Iowa, where Trump got 98%, he only got 1%. That must have been a real revelation to him. He fervently thought he had a chance, as do most Dumocrats. They SAY Trumps a threat, but they can’t say why, except for a few policies of Trump’s with which they don’t agree. They have no evidence of corruption on his part, while there is ample evidence of corruption on the Dumocrat side, which is ignored. I just don’t understand these “Trump haters.” They ignore all the good things Trump has done for this country in their irrational hatred of a man who has proven himself to be unbeatable. Trump has brought back the “good economy” Obama told us would never return to cover up his inability to do so, but they will not admit it. They keep harping on the “bubble theory,” saying this economy CAN’T stay this good, and “the bubble will burst” soon, hurting us all.” They are “doom-sayers” and can’t accept anything Trump does as good. If it was revealed that Trump was “The Second Coming,” they’d deny it, even as he proved it, conclusively. (TTN 45)

Ignorant Liberal Judges

U.S. District Court Judge William Young issued a 47-page ruling saying AR-15s and large-capacity magazines are not protected by the 2nd amendment. Where he gets that is beyond my imagination. Maybe he looked into his crystal ball. Where, in the Constitution, does it say WHICH GUNS are, or are not covered by the Second Amendment? The Second clearly says, “[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” What part of that says that certain guns should be exempt from the Amendment? Nowhere is there a definition in the Second Amendment as to which “arms” shall be included, and which shall NOT be included. This liberal fool “ruled” according to his anti-gun fool OPINION, NOT by what is IN the Constitution. He should be instantly reversed, and removed fro office for his bias. Rules should be made forcing such judges to cite the place in the Constitution that supports his or her rulings. (Just common sense)

Punish Bad Cops!

It’s no surprise that cop who murdered George Floyd thought he could do it and get away with it. After all, he’s done it before without punishment. The blame for that murder should be directly on his shoulders, and on the shoulders of his mayor and the other liberal politicians who run that city. If you don’t punish a cop when he gets out of line, it’s going to empower him to get out of line again, as it did with this one. He has had a total of 19 complaints of abuses of his power as a cop, with NO PUNISHMENT. Lack of punishment for such abuses has to come from the TOP. The top in Minneapolis is the mayor, whose policies led directly to this, and probably other murders. George Floyd was no saint, no matter how much the media wants to paint him as such. He has a long criminal record which includes his own violent abuses. But that record doesn’t give a cop the right to execute him summarily, over a (maybe) counterfeit $20 bill.

Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised to find one in my own pocket, because there are many in circulation. They know this. That’s why cashiers have that ubiquitous yellow pen they use on all bills, $20 or above, presented to them. There are 800 cops in Minneapolis, and one bad one. Maybe more than that, I don’t know. Then there are three new cops, with this bad cop as their training officer. How a cop with a record like his ever got to be a training officer, I don’t know. Bad liberal politics, I guess. So should you get rid of those 796 good cops because of one bad one? Not a chance. Laws don’t enforce themselves. They need police to enforce them. It’s no secret why the lawless want to get rid of the cops. They want to be able to commit their crimes without worrying about a cop putting them in prison. Anybody seriously wanting to disband the cops is a criminal—and that includes politicians who buy the bullsh-t put out by the “disband the cops” fools. (Just common sense)

Why No Protests?

The fools of the world were quick to protest and demonstrate when George Floyd was murdered by that ONE “dirty cop” in Minneapolis, but nobody seems to be concerned about all the cops who have been ambushed and killed, both before and after Floyd’s unfortunate death. Yeah, I know. Those predisposed to demonstrate, even riot over the death of a black man just aren’t interested in demonstrating over the deaths of a few cops. That shows me where their priorities are. The cops, most of whom are fine people doing a difficult and dangerous thankless job, go out every day and try there best to keep people safe, while a small number of damned fools go out and murder them. And except for a few of us, nobody seems to care when some thugs ambush and kill these easily identified people by their distinctive uniforms and cars. Yet they keep coming to work every day, just doing their jobs, in spite of the danger. It would serve these fools right if the cops disbanded themselves and just “walked away.” The people they are protecting (not all, thankfully) just don’t appreciate what they do for them and the wish to disband the cops is something they just haven’t thought out very well. (Just common sense)

Ignoring Reality

It just proves the anti-gun fools have a very different motive for “getting rid of guns” than lowering the crime rate when they continue to pursue their silly, unenforceable, USELESS anti-gun laws in the direct face of the fact that, even as they pass laws against guns, violent crime goes down—before any of their laws even take effect. That’s because “concealed carry” is up. Meaning their laws have NO EFFECT on violent crime. And the only viable alternate motive I can think of is to completely disarm the American population for their own purposes. They’re ignorant of yet another fact: that law-breakers don’t obey laws. Then there are those millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of the law-breakers, and those sold and stolen every day. So there is actually NO WAY they can eliminate all guns from the equation. I guess they’re satisfied to remove only the legal guns—if they can. Of course, if they are able to do that (doubtful), there are all those illegal guns out there, to victimize the law-abiding, since they won’t have guns with which to oppose them. Nor will the “government agents” who come to taken your property meet as many guns in the hands of their intended victims. Remember: the first thing despots do is disarm the population so they can walk right over them with impunity. (Truth About Guns)

Defund the Rioters

The movement to defund the cops is growing among the stupid and the criminals (a repetition, there). Only the stupid or a law breaker wants to get the cops out of the picture so they can better victimize the law-abiding. But who is paying the air fare for all those losers who break into those people’s businesses, steal their property and trash what they can’t steal? Who is supplying those pallets full of bricks strategically placed in riot areas? Or the cache of guns that were found in DC close to the White House? Who are the real financiers of the riots? Somebody is. Rumors are that it is George Soros and his accomplices, but so far it is only rumors. Nobody has seen fit to do a real investigation to find out who they are. Yes, one cop kneeled on the neck of George Floyd until he died, and three other cops just stood by and watched while he murdered this man. It looks very much like simple police brutality until you think about the past association of these two men. Was there more to it than that? Did that cop have a grudge against Floyd as motive for first degree murder? It’s known that the two worked a security gig together. They knew each other a lot more than has been revealed. Will an honest investigation uncover a murder plot? Meanwhile, ignorant fools want to weaken the police, and many fool politicians are willing. Politicians in Minneapolis are talking about in fact ABOLISHING their own police force, allowing the law breakers free rein to steal from, and murder their residents with impunity, rape their women and children, and commit all sorts of crimes upon them, without worrying about the cops catching them and putting them in prison. (Just common sense)

Understanding Racism

Talk about a contradiction in terms! There actually is no understanding of racism. To hate somebody because of something he/she has no control over is really stupid. I understand somewhat the racism against American Indians 100 years ago, since they usually did a very efficient job of killing white people. But that’s long past and that racism should no longer be a “thing.” American Indians today are, for the most part, peaceful people, just trying to get along, just like we are. Racism against black people because of the color of their skin is not the same. They never did anything to rate the hatred. They were the VICTIMS. The hatred directed at them is based entirely on the opinions of those who enslaved them years ago. It is an outgrowth of that, and is to serve the wish of those racists to have somebody who is a “lesser person” than they are. Black people can’t change the color of their skin, so discriminating against them as a group is doubly stupid. Discriminating against ANY group, AS a group, is insane. Hatred of the Jewish people because of their religion, for instance. You shouldn’t hate somebody because of their faith. To do so means YOU can be hated because of YOUR faith. Nobody should ever be put down because of the group they are in. People are INDIVIDUALS, and I judge them as such. I look at each INDIVIDUAL and judge him/her AS an individual. If that person is a good person, I treat him/her as such. If a bad person, I treat them as I would any bad person, regardless of the group they are in. That’s the only LOGICAL way. (Just common sense)

Is She Serious?

“MOMS against Guns (or something like that)” founder talks about “gun sense” and blames the “extreme view” of the gun lobby for being an “obstacle to her group’s goals.” In that she’s right, although the gun lobby’s views are NOT “extreme.” It has never been “extreme” to wish to be able to defend one’s self against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of law-breakers. Also being an “obstacle” to the wishes of the anti-gun fools is the unalterable FACT that nothing they propose has EVER stopped a single “gun crime.” Then they come up with such foolishness as to predict that “teachers with guns DOUBLES both the possibility of kids being shot AND the instance of suicide. Where they get such nonsense is unfathomable because there certainly aren’t any statistics to support that “flight of fancy.” They think the way to self defense is to make yourself DEFENSELESS, and that’s what’s behind their activities. That’s what they’re selling—and they wonder why a MAJORITY of Americans want no part of their nonsense. They claim that a majority supports them, and that’s a LIE. The majority is a lot more intelligent than they seem to be, which is proven by the fact that gun sales go up in major fashion after every mass killing. (The Oak Ridger)

End the Police?

That’s what some people want to do. And if you examine the kind of people who are the loudest in trying to get rid of the police, they are the criminals. The terrorists. The child sex abusers. The rapists. In other words, the very people who will benefit from our stupidity if we ever let it happen. “Defund the cops?” They are the first and last line of defense in this country where the politicians can only think about disarming the law-abiding, not the law breakers. What would happen if the cops were not there? That is very predictable. It’s happening to some degree all over this country, right now. We would see a crime rate increase the like of which we have never seen because there would be nothing to stop it. It happened 100 years ago in Boston when the cops went on strike in 1919, leaving no cops to keep crime controlled. Crime skyrocketed. The murder rate rose to levels never seen before, as did all sorts of crime. They had to bring in the state militia--soldiers--to restore order. Which led to laws banning strikes involving public safety and order. That leaves one thing that becomes crystal clear: that to eliminate the police is to commit societal suicide. Honest people don’t want that. Law breakers do. Which is why they push it. (American Thinker)

Bernie's A Damned Fool

Dumocrat former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders called the killing of that Iranian general an “assassination,” and I think he’s actually sorry it happened. But it was NOT an “assassination.” It was the justified execution of a mass murderer. And his opinion mirrors the opinions of just about all liberals. Liberals want to destroy this country, and they’ll try everything they can to accomplish it, including criticizing measures that are just good planning. That general was a simple mass murderer, operating under color of Iranian law. He needed to be killed. He didn’t deserve to breathe the same air as human beings. The same is true of the rest of the Islamic terrorists. We need to change the way we treat them, and if they are identified for sure as Islamic terrorists, they should be shot on sight. They claim they want to die in “the service of Allah,” and we should be happy to accommodate them. (Daily Caller)

Anti-Gun Hysteria

Can you believe it? Some anti-gun fools pretending to be school “officials” called the COPS on a 6-year-old CHILD for pointing her FINGER at a teacher and saying, “I’ll shoot you.” With what? Her FINGER? And that requires the local cops to waste their time responding and filling out the paperwork that comes with that response? Worse yet, the child had Downs Syndrome, which means she might not have even known the implication inherent in her words and the gesture. Mom had no problem with the child being sent to the principal’s office, but calling the COPS? That shows a stupidity that should call for the “school official” to be fired for incompetence. If you’re afraid of a 6-year-old’s FINGER, you’re incompetent. Now this BABY has “a record” of “threatening a school teacher.”” Knowing they type of people you find as bureaucrats, that might even be a major problem for that child later in her life. School officials are supposed to have, and use, good judgment in such cases, and this school official apparently had none. Worse yet, this is not the first time a school child has gotten in police trouble for pointing a FINGER at someone, pretending it’s a gun. It has happened several times, including in 2019 in Kansas where a middle school student was charged with a FELONY for pointing a “finger gun” at somebody while other kids were only charged with misdemeanors for bringing real guns to school. Stupidity reigns supreme. (Bearing Arms)

Left Wing Setup

Anybody who believes this rioting is spontaneous is addled. It’s a setup, from one end to the other by left-wingers who want to create chaos so they can use it for their own purposes. Yes, it began as a spontaneous demonstration protesting the murder of George Floyd. But it quickly morphed into a destructive riot as ANTIFA goons infiltrated, and took over things, burning, spray painting, destroying private property belonging to people who had absolutely nothing to do with Floyd’s death, even murdering several people who tried to defend people’s property—one of which was a former cop trying to defend a friend’s business, who was summarily shot to death by looters. In one place somebody drove up to one building and without a word opened fire, killing a federal employee. Standing by in many liberal (Dumbocrat)-run cities, many other ANTIFA goons imitated what the ones in Minneapolis were doing, spreading things widely all over the country. Other left-wingers in other countries did likewise. Some white men dumped pallets-full of bricks for the rioters to throw. White girls were caught spraying Black Lives Matter slogans on buildings, and fled when confronted by real protesters. (Freedom Headlines)

"Outrage! Outrage!"

Rioters are outraged that government forces would use deadly force to quell what has become often deadly rioting, ostensibly because of the murder of George Floyd, but which has devolved into often deadly attacks upon innocent people and their property for no reason. I guess they expected us to “knuckle under” and cower in fear at their antics, but NO! We don’t knuckle under to fools. In one place a National Guard trooper actually fired at a truck that was speeding toward a roadblock with obvious intent to kill somebody. He missed, but I don’t think it was an accident. Those people are not trained to miss. I believed he missed because he didn’t want to kill anybody—just stop that speeding truck—and he did. The driver fled in another direction. But one rioter in one place didn’t miss. He pulled up in front of a federal building and fired into it, killing a federal worker. They’re all bent out of shape because President Trump has promised a “junkyard dog defense” of the White House if rioters made it past the fence onto White House grounds. They’re angry because Trump mentioned “the guns coming out” if the riots became more deadly. He was referring to DEFENSIVE guns if the rioters came with guns, which might happen as the violence increases. (Just common sense)

"Only the Cops..."

The anti-gun fools are constantly telling us that “Only the cops are responsible enough to have guns.” Oh, really? How about that cop who threatened a 17-year-old with being shot for trying to leave school to keep an orthodontist’s appointment? William Miller, 17, tried to leave school to keep an orthodontist’s appointment and the school called the cops on him. And this cop, when he tried to continue on his way after telling him he had a good reason, told him, “You’re gonna get shot if you come one f—king foot closer to me.” That’s the best he had. To try and frighten a school child with the threat of getting shot. This is a “responsible cop” who is one of the only people responsible enough to carry a gun. I don’t know what was going through this cop’s mind, but he just proved he had no business BEING a cop, much less being able to carry a gun. “Barney Fife revisited.” If this is the best Pasco County, Florida has to offer, that makes me afraid… very afraid. Granted, the kid was being somewhat of a smart ass, but that’s no reason for a COP to threaten to SHOOT him for being TRUANT. That cop is unfit to be around children. (Daily Mail)

The War on Cops

These riots have devolved from concern for the wanton killing of a black man in Minneapolis by a cop into a “killing spree” against cops. The cops are at a disadvantage because they know their liberal politicians do not “have their backs.” They carry guns but are not allowed to use them, or even brandish them as criminals and hoodlums throw bricks at their heads, run them over with cars, gang up on them and beat the hell out of them, and even shoot them to death. Recently, in New York city, a cop drew his gun in defense of a “white shirt” (officer) somebody threw a brick at, Mayor DiBlasio, the man who was so “proud” of his daughter for getting arrested, from his “Ivory Tower,” said that cop should be fired, when that cop, fearing for his life and the life of one of his officers, brandished his gun to run off the attacker. I salute that cop for not shooting. I would have shot the SOB who threw that brick. One of a pallet of bricks that have mysteriously appeared in riot areas. They criticize President Trump for threatening real opposition to their terrorism on the streets, as they threaten to “come into the burbs and take what’s ours.” These cops know about the four cops in St. Louis who were shot, one government employee who was shot to death, several cops who were severely beaten when ganged up on by rioters. DiBlasio should “come out of his Ivory Tower” and find out what it’s like to be forced to try and restore order against deadly force without the backing of your politicians. (Just common sense)

Unconstitutional Law

Virginia just passed a “gun ban law” and a “gun confiscation law.” Both are unconstitutional and those voting for them, as will as those who attempt to enforce them, should be prosecuted and imprisoned. But that isn’t going to happen, because, in one of the biggest oversights the Founders made when writing the Constitution was not to provide a penalty for making unconstitutional laws beyond having the courts reverse them. So corrupt politicians can make as many unconstitutional laws as they wish, and enforce them until the Courts declare them unconstitutional. BY then much damage has been done, to many people, sometimes even including prison time for “violating” what actually was not even a law. Making and enforcing such laws has almost become a “cottage industry” since they have no fear of being punished for getting such abominable laws passed. Politicians who pass such laws are “despots in waiting” who want to be able to “walk right over” the people without worrying about the possibility of getting shot. The very actions of those Virginia politicians to try and whip up fears of an “armed attack” since the “other side” had guns, should be something for which they should be punished. (Daily Caller)

Socialism Sucks!

It has destroyed societies wherever it has been used—or is about to. Socialism produces nothing. It merely steals the production of new wealth by the producer and GIVES it, unearned, to those who produce NOTHING. It is only beneficial to those who would rather live at the expense of others instead of earning for themselves. It caused 75 years of misery for the Russian people under communism. Communism is one name collectivism goes under and socialism is another. They call it by different names to fool their intended victims into thinking one is different from the other. But the only differences are cosmetic. Like taking bumpers off cars. They’re still cars. Cuba used to have a thriving economy—until Fidel Castro came along and took over. Then it began the economic plunge that has about hit bottom today. The average age of all the cars (except those driven by government officials, of course) is 1950. They are held together with spit, chewing gum, and duct tape. In Venezuela, their version is in the process of failing, right now. They are having riots in the streets and empty grocery store shelves. Those are staples of socialism because it produces nothing while promising much. (Just common sense)

"Just Taking What's Ours"

One gutty reporter confronted one of the rioters in Minneapolis and asked why they were causing violent riots and that rioter had the audacity to say, “We’re only taking what’s ours!” What a misguided notion THAT is! The property of other does NOT belong to those rioters. They are “the dregs of society” who are USING the death of George Floyd as an excuse to steal property that is NOT theirs. These riots have ceased to be about Floyd’s death and have become a vehicle for chaos and thievery. The fools have taken over the streets. Yes, the City of Minneapolis has a clear problem with police brutality, as is illustrated by the fact that no less than 44 people have been rendered unconscious by an officer with his knee on their necks—with none of them being punished. That city is being run by Dumbocrats, as in many great cities, and the policies they impose CONTRIBUTE to bad behavior, not only on the part of the cops, but by citizens, as well—which only makes things worse. I shudder when I hear about politicians turning violent criminals loose for a spurious reason so they can prey on innocent people—and then they wonder why their crime rate skyrockets. They CLAIM they’re only releasing non-violent criminals, but the facts put the lie to that claim. And former presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar contributed to that by refusing to punish this murderous cop in previous cases of brutality. 99-44/100% of cops are “good guys,” but it is only the “bad guys” among them that get noticed, to the detriment of those “good guys.” (Just common sense)

Not Demonstration: Riot!

They are billing the black riots all over the country using the death of George Floyd as “demonstrations” But they ARE “riots” designed as an excuse to burn and otherwise destroy the private property of innocent people who had nothing to do with Floyd’s death, and don’t even live in the same city. What began as a demonstration has been “taken over” by ANTIFA-style goons whose only goal is as much destruction as possible. These are the same people who appear at all demonstrations and turn them into riots, for their own purposes. It has been noted that many of the rioters who have been arrested do not live where they are rioting, and that the same people are seen at riots all over the country. Somebody is PAYING these people to foment these riots, and paying their way to get there. For what purpose, you ask? To create chaos. And as more and more riots break out all across the country, we are fast approaching a race war we don’t want. I certainly don’t, but I’m afraid I will be caught up in it without any action on my part. I see the mayor of Los Angeles calling for the National Guard in his town, which is thousands of miles from Minneapolis. Why are people in LA rioting over a death in Minneapolis? They aren’t. They’re just creating chaos for their own purposes. And of course, NBC is banning their reporters from using the word “riot” to describe these riots, so as to slant the news in their favor. (Hollywood Conservative)

Closing: Bad Idea

One of the first things the politicians did when faced with the Coronavirus was to surrender to it. They did that by posting their “stay at home orders” that effectively ENDED commerce in the United States. Which caused a panic that is much worse than the pandemic because if it is allowed to continue it will END the United States, and allow those fools pushing that failed system, socialism, to take over. President Trump thought that was the best way to go early on, but quickly realized it was a big mistake, which he is trying valiantly now to correct. If you destroy the economy of a nation you destroy that nation, creating a nation where those who survive are the ones who are better at TAKING what they want—until we run out of what they want due to nobody making them any more. Pretty soon the ONLY way to gain anything is to be stronger and more able to just TAKE it, and only the strong will then survive. Businesses need to be open. Employees need to work so they’ll be paid so they can buy what they need. Without those employees getting paid and using the money to buy what they need, those businesses that count on their money can’t pay their own employees, and so on and so forth. (Just common sense)