Left Wing Setup

Anybody who believes this rioting is spontaneous is addled. It’s a setup, from one end to the other by left-wingers who want to create chaos so they can use it for their own purposes. Yes, it began as a spontaneous demonstration protesting the murder of George Floyd. But it quickly morphed into a destructive riot as ANTIFA goons infiltrated, and took over things, burning, spray painting, destroying private property belonging to people who had absolutely nothing to do with Floyd’s death, even murdering several people who tried to defend people’s property—one of which was a former cop trying to defend a friend’s business, who was summarily shot to death by looters. In one place somebody drove up to one building and without a word opened fire, killing a federal employee. Standing by in many liberal (Dumbocrat)-run cities, many other ANTIFA goons imitated what the ones in Minneapolis were doing, spreading things widely all over the country. Other left-wingers in other countries did likewise. Some white men dumped pallets-full of bricks for the rioters to throw. White girls were caught spraying Black Lives Matter slogans on buildings, and fled when confronted by real protesters. (Freedom Headlines)

"Outrage! Outrage!"

Rioters are outraged that government forces would use deadly force to quell what has become often deadly rioting, ostensibly because of the murder of George Floyd, but which has devolved into often deadly attacks upon innocent people and their property for no reason. I guess they expected us to “knuckle under” and cower in fear at their antics, but NO! We don’t knuckle under to fools. In one place a National Guard trooper actually fired at a truck that was speeding toward a roadblock with obvious intent to kill somebody. He missed, but I don’t think it was an accident. Those people are not trained to miss. I believed he missed because he didn’t want to kill anybody—just stop that speeding truck—and he did. The driver fled in another direction. But one rioter in one place didn’t miss. He pulled up in front of a federal building and fired into it, killing a federal worker. They’re all bent out of shape because President Trump has promised a “junkyard dog defense” of the White House if rioters made it past the fence onto White House grounds. They’re angry because Trump mentioned “the guns coming out” if the riots became more deadly. He was referring to DEFENSIVE guns if the rioters came with guns, which might happen as the violence increases. (Just common sense)

"Only the Cops..."

The anti-gun fools are constantly telling us that “Only the cops are responsible enough to have guns.” Oh, really? How about that cop who threatened a 17-year-old with being shot for trying to leave school to keep an orthodontist’s appointment? William Miller, 17, tried to leave school to keep an orthodontist’s appointment and the school called the cops on him. And this cop, when he tried to continue on his way after telling him he had a good reason, told him, “You’re gonna get shot if you come one f—king foot closer to me.” That’s the best he had. To try and frighten a school child with the threat of getting shot. This is a “responsible cop” who is one of the only people responsible enough to carry a gun. I don’t know what was going through this cop’s mind, but he just proved he had no business BEING a cop, much less being able to carry a gun. “Barney Fife revisited.” If this is the best Pasco County, Florida has to offer, that makes me afraid… very afraid. Granted, the kid was being somewhat of a smart ass, but that’s no reason for a COP to threaten to SHOOT him for being TRUANT. That cop is unfit to be around children. (Daily Mail)

The War on Cops

These riots have devolved from concern for the wanton killing of a black man in Minneapolis by a cop into a “killing spree” against cops. The cops are at a disadvantage because they know their liberal politicians do not “have their backs.” They carry guns but are not allowed to use them, or even brandish them as criminals and hoodlums throw bricks at their heads, run them over with cars, gang up on them and beat the hell out of them, and even shoot them to death. Recently, in New York city, a cop drew his gun in defense of a “white shirt” (officer) somebody threw a brick at, Mayor DiBlasio, the man who was so “proud” of his daughter for getting arrested, from his “Ivory Tower,” said that cop should be fired, when that cop, fearing for his life and the life of one of his officers, brandished his gun to run off the attacker. I salute that cop for not shooting. I would have shot the SOB who threw that brick. One of a pallet of bricks that have mysteriously appeared in riot areas. They criticize President Trump for threatening real opposition to their terrorism on the streets, as they threaten to “come into the burbs and take what’s ours.” These cops know about the four cops in St. Louis who were shot, one government employee who was shot to death, several cops who were severely beaten when ganged up on by rioters. DiBlasio should “come out of his Ivory Tower” and find out what it’s like to be forced to try and restore order against deadly force without the backing of your politicians. (Just common sense)

Unconstitutional Law

Virginia just passed a “gun ban law” and a “gun confiscation law.” Both are unconstitutional and those voting for them, as will as those who attempt to enforce them, should be prosecuted and imprisoned. But that isn’t going to happen, because, in one of the biggest oversights the Founders made when writing the Constitution was not to provide a penalty for making unconstitutional laws beyond having the courts reverse them. So corrupt politicians can make as many unconstitutional laws as they wish, and enforce them until the Courts declare them unconstitutional. BY then much damage has been done, to many people, sometimes even including prison time for “violating” what actually was not even a law. Making and enforcing such laws has almost become a “cottage industry” since they have no fear of being punished for getting such abominable laws passed. Politicians who pass such laws are “despots in waiting” who want to be able to “walk right over” the people without worrying about the possibility of getting shot. The very actions of those Virginia politicians to try and whip up fears of an “armed attack” since the “other side” had guns, should be something for which they should be punished. (Daily Caller)

Socialism Sucks!

It has destroyed societies wherever it has been used—or is about to. Socialism produces nothing. It merely steals the production of new wealth by the producer and GIVES it, unearned, to those who produce NOTHING. It is only beneficial to those who would rather live at the expense of others instead of earning for themselves. It caused 75 years of misery for the Russian people under communism. Communism is one name collectivism goes under and socialism is another. They call it by different names to fool their intended victims into thinking one is different from the other. But the only differences are cosmetic. Like taking bumpers off cars. They’re still cars. Cuba used to have a thriving economy—until Fidel Castro came along and took over. Then it began the economic plunge that has about hit bottom today. The average age of all the cars (except those driven by government officials, of course) is 1950. They are held together with spit, chewing gum, and duct tape. In Venezuela, their version is in the process of failing, right now. They are having riots in the streets and empty grocery store shelves. Those are staples of socialism because it produces nothing while promising much. (Just common sense)

"Just Taking What's Ours"

One gutty reporter confronted one of the rioters in Minneapolis and asked why they were causing violent riots and that rioter had the audacity to say, “We’re only taking what’s ours!” What a misguided notion THAT is! The property of other does NOT belong to those rioters. They are “the dregs of society” who are USING the death of George Floyd as an excuse to steal property that is NOT theirs. These riots have ceased to be about Floyd’s death and have become a vehicle for chaos and thievery. The fools have taken over the streets. Yes, the City of Minneapolis has a clear problem with police brutality, as is illustrated by the fact that no less than 44 people have been rendered unconscious by an officer with his knee on their necks—with none of them being punished. That city is being run by Dumbocrats, as in many great cities, and the policies they impose CONTRIBUTE to bad behavior, not only on the part of the cops, but by citizens, as well—which only makes things worse. I shudder when I hear about politicians turning violent criminals loose for a spurious reason so they can prey on innocent people—and then they wonder why their crime rate skyrockets. They CLAIM they’re only releasing non-violent criminals, but the facts put the lie to that claim. And former presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar contributed to that by refusing to punish this murderous cop in previous cases of brutality. 99-44/100% of cops are “good guys,” but it is only the “bad guys” among them that get noticed, to the detriment of those “good guys.” (Just common sense)

Not Demonstration: Riot!

They are billing the black riots all over the country using the death of George Floyd as “demonstrations” But they ARE “riots” designed as an excuse to burn and otherwise destroy the private property of innocent people who had nothing to do with Floyd’s death, and don’t even live in the same city. What began as a demonstration has been “taken over” by ANTIFA-style goons whose only goal is as much destruction as possible. These are the same people who appear at all demonstrations and turn them into riots, for their own purposes. It has been noted that many of the rioters who have been arrested do not live where they are rioting, and that the same people are seen at riots all over the country. Somebody is PAYING these people to foment these riots, and paying their way to get there. For what purpose, you ask? To create chaos. And as more and more riots break out all across the country, we are fast approaching a race war we don’t want. I certainly don’t, but I’m afraid I will be caught up in it without any action on my part. I see the mayor of Los Angeles calling for the National Guard in his town, which is thousands of miles from Minneapolis. Why are people in LA rioting over a death in Minneapolis? They aren’t. They’re just creating chaos for their own purposes. And of course, NBC is banning their reporters from using the word “riot” to describe these riots, so as to slant the news in their favor. (Hollywood Conservative)

Closing: Bad Idea

One of the first things the politicians did when faced with the Coronavirus was to surrender to it. They did that by posting their “stay at home orders” that effectively ENDED commerce in the United States. Which caused a panic that is much worse than the pandemic because if it is allowed to continue it will END the United States, and allow those fools pushing that failed system, socialism, to take over. President Trump thought that was the best way to go early on, but quickly realized it was a big mistake, which he is trying valiantly now to correct. If you destroy the economy of a nation you destroy that nation, creating a nation where those who survive are the ones who are better at TAKING what they want—until we run out of what they want due to nobody making them any more. Pretty soon the ONLY way to gain anything is to be stronger and more able to just TAKE it, and only the strong will then survive. Businesses need to be open. Employees need to work so they’ll be paid so they can buy what they need. Without those employees getting paid and using the money to buy what they need, those businesses that count on their money can’t pay their own employees, and so on and so forth. (Just common sense)

How Many Must Die?

How many people who have information detrimental to Hillary or Bill Clinton must die before somebody actually starts investigating the series of suspicious deaths of those people who might testify against them? Or who is in a position to stop them from some of their atrocities such as that Supreme Court Justice who was found with a pillow over his head, dead while visiting a Dumocrat supporter? That took hours for the U. S. Marshal service to even show up, and whose death was “certified” by an obscure justice of the peace instead of a real judge? Then there was the man who “committed suicide” by shooting himself in the head—TWICE just before he was to testify against one of the Clintons. Those are only a few of the badly bungled “investigations” into some of those suspicious deaths that have not even been questioned. The investigation that should ensue is one into the frequency of people dying before they can implicate a Clinton in wrongdoing, or who can block them FROM that wrongdoing. (Three Percenter Nation)

Can't Make Self Defense

Those two Georgia rednecks who murdered a black man are now claiming self defense in the murder, according to their attorneys. They’re saying it was a justified killing because they were defending themselves when their victim saw two men with guns attacking him and fought back. Fighting back doesn’t qualify as an attack. Not in my world, anyway. You can’t attack a man on the street and not expect him to fight back. They say they “suspected him” of committing a crime when he entered that construction site, when all he wanted was maybe some water. He didn’t steal anything and left right away. They had no real reason to follow him with guns and attack him, while he had every reason to fight back. That does NOT create a self defense situation for those two armed men who were attacking an UNARMED black man who was doing nothing but running on a public road. Last I heard, running while black was not a crime—except to racist red necks. These men need to be put away for a long time. (Mail News)

Civil War Coming

That’s what Rush Limbaugh thinks, anyway, and I agree with him. Dumocrats all over the country are insisting on keeping their “stay-at-home orders” in place, long after they have been proven to NOT be a preventative to the spread of the virus. Those that do let their states open put impossible limitations on business, such as limiting restaurants to 50% business. Limiting them to using only 50% of their tables eliminates ANY profit, and profit is the ONLY reason they go to work in the morning. Keeping everybody at home stops all production of goods and soon there will be shortages of everything, including food. That’s when people will start a serious rebellion. Then the cops will intervene, and start shooting people. After that it’s “open season,” and the people will begin shooting back. Then it’s war. And that’s what the Dumocrats want. After the war is over, they can then institute their socialism, which is what’s behind all this. The virus is just the vehicle they were looking for. The Socialist Dumocrat Party is subversive. They always have been. (Freedom Updates)

Watching A Murder

Many people say we need to wait until all the facts come out before making a judgment in the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. I disagree. The image of a cop, who has had many complaints against him but never disciplined kneeling with his knee on the neck of this black man is enough. What preceded it does not matter. That is excessive force, especially since the “crime” the man MAY have committed is not a violent one. Word is, he remained in that position, with his knee on the man’s neck for a full five minutes. That tells me the man’s death was NOT an accident. He was MURDERED while the world watched. The four cops involved have now been fired, but that’s not enough. They should be charged with premeditated murder and convicted. Riots and looting are not a proper response. The businesses so looted are not to blame for the murderous actions of those cops. The “powers that be” need to act quickly to charge these cops, or the city will suffer more damage from further riots. Further delay in doing so is unconscionable. (Just common sense)

Crossed A Red Line

Obama laid out a “red line” that the Iran Ayatollah’s should not cross, and they did cross it. What did Obama do? Nothing. In fact, he sent them a palletful of money to use in their further “red line” crossings. Which, of course, empowered them (in their minds) to continue their outrages. Then our regime changed. President Trump was elected, and Iran thought they could continue their outrages unpunished, as usual. But they didn’t reckon on this president. He drew a “red line” and they crossed it. So he sent a drone to “take out” their number 2 man, and top general. Which sent a message to the Ayatollah that he could be next. They know where he is, at all times, just as they did the general. And he is now “part of the landscape” outside the Baghdad Airport. He is fertilizing the greenery. The Ayatollah must be “quaking in his slippers,” watching the skies for his own drone. He knows that if he continues to “bite at Trump’s ankles,” he will soon see one—just before it makes HIM “part of the landscape. The snowflake Dumocrats, of course, criticize Trump for taking this general out. But they would have also complained if Trump dd not take him out and he murdered many more Americans. Whatever he does, Dumocrats don’t like. (Just common sense)

They're Doing It Again

Dumocrats in Congress are trying to pass a bill into law that will inevitably weaken the Second Amendment. Their umpteenth try. This bill will do many things that are not good. Among them is the ability to INDEFINITELY delay background checks. Expands background check requirements, and offers money to anti-gun fools. If they can indefinitely delay background checks, that means you cannot buy your gun until they “graciously allow” you to do so, whenever they get around to it. We know that a right delayed is a right denied, and that’s what they want do. They are hiding the purpose of this bill by misnaming it “The Urban Progress Act.” They know this bill will be strongly opposed, and they hope, by misnaming it, to cause us not to “tumble” to its real purpose. It’s sponsored by Rep. Robin Kelly, a Dumocrat, of course. This bill, if passed, will be yet another unconstitutional law against gun ownership by American citizens, since it is an “infringement” upon the right guaranteed us by the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Don’t let it happen. Sign the protest included here. (Firearms Policy Coalition)

A Bad Decision

Shutting down the economy because of the Coronavirus was a bad decision, and I put it down to the newness to the job of our current president. In his lack of experience he took some bad advice, and managed to destroy all the good he had done in his first three years. Playing right into the hands of that subversive Dumocrat Party. The economy going to hell is just what they want, and you can count on them blaming Trump for everything bad that happens because of the “shutdown,” ignoring the virus as a causative factor. All they will point up is that the economy went “down the tubes.” Shutting down was supposed to be “the cure,” but it soon became evident that the cure was worse than the disease. Law-abiding people are ignoring the law, demanding that we open it back up. Trump is realizing his error and is opening things back up, with certain necessary restrictions only. Many governors, most of them Dumocrats, have taken advantage of the shutdown to impose unconstitutional rules on us, claiming that the virus allows them to “bypass” the Constitution, which it does NOT. But they do it, anyway, and enforce it until the Supreme Court tells them they may NOT, after much damage has been done. (Just common sense)

Sex Ed for Children

In Chicago, they want to start a sex-ed program for children as young as FIVE! Looks like they want to go back into the educating of children about sex business that they used to participate in, before they were “found out” and theded (we hope). In their prior program, they designed “sensors” to gauge the child's physical reaction while they showed them government-made porn. For the girls, it was a penis-shaped probe that went in her vagina. For the boys, a similar “probe” that went in his anus. Of course, the “probe” wasn't really necessary for boys, since they could figure out his reaction to the porn by his erection. But not them. They wanted to shove something up his rear end. Now they want to teach children too young to even know what sex IS, all about sex. Have you ever seen a child that learns about something who doesn't want to TRY it? So the net result of their “experiments” will be a significant INCREASE in sex among small children. (WGN News)

Gun Control Backfire

In Great Britain they passed laws that essentially DISARMED their entire population (except for the law breakers, of course). They thought that would result in fewer violent crimes. Of course, it didn’t. Law breakers still got their guns, and those criminals who couldn’t get guns illegally took to using knives with which to do their violent crimes, leading to what Britons call “the knife crime epidemic.” Of course, this was to be expected among people with intelligence, anyway. Apparently, the politicians in the UK don’t have enough intelligence to expect this kind of a result. Next, they will ban KNIVES, hoping THAT will work—and it won’t. Bad guys will still get their guns—and knives—and violent crime will continue, unabated. Why politicians everywhere don’t learn from experience, I don’t know. Maybe it’s because their purpose is NOT to “reduce gun crime,” but to make it impossible for the law-abiding to defend themselves from the attacks of the law breakers, who routinely IGNORE such laws. (Gun Free Zone)

It's About Damned Time!

I’ve been wondering for a long time why former FBI Director Comey is still out of prison. It’s because nobody seems to have found it necessary to properly investigate the FBI’s handling of the General Flynn “investigation.” Now current FBI Director Wray has finally, after much delay, ordered that investigation, hopefully to get some of the dirt off the FBI’s skirts. Wow! They now tell us that the FBI has no authority to file criminal charges against former employees. They waited until they could no longer prosecute him. Well, who DOES? There must be some way to punish them for putting a decorated war hero through such a turmoil, causing him to go bankrupt, and even putting him in jail, after even the investigators said they didn’t think he was guilty of anything. They even tried to drop the investigation, early on, but Strzok wouldn’t have it. He wanted Flynn’s scalp, and he got it. Even though he had to pony up the “evidence.” Yes, he did finally lie to the FBI. He was TOLD by the FBI what to say, and he finally broke, and said that he was told to say. Flynn was TOLD, by the FBI, to lie to an FBI questioner to avoid having his children put through the same wringer. And that was the lie they “got him” on. Maybe now some of those who railroaded Flynn will “get theirs.” But I’m not holding my breath. (Washington Examiner)

Shutdown: Wrong Move

I’m sure President Trump thought he was doing the right thing by closing down the entire economy of the United States, but it was actually the exact wrong thing to do, in his lack of experience running a country instead of just a corporation. What it did was completely destroy all the good things he had done for the economy in his first three years in office. And threatened to destroy the economy, period. With nobody working and producing needed goods, there would soon be no goods on the store shelves, and people would begin to starve. Add to that the complete lack of income, and people wouldn’t be able to afford to buy what little was on those shelves, and things would collapse. More important to the government, there would soon be no taxes paid because people weren’t making money. Today the government is sending people money, but soon there wouldn’t be any money to send, and no amount of printing it would do anything. The cure was worse than the disease, and people would begin to die. Some would just kill each other to get what was theirs, since that would be the only way to get it. Chaos would ensue. Those who wanted to take us over would do so in our weakened state, and soon we would be in a dictatorship. It will have been inevitable. Fortunately, realizing his mistake, he is trying to reverse it. Hopefully, not too late. (Just common sense)

Balance of Power

I think people who can THINK need to ask why the feds are “stockpiling weapons” while at the same time trying their best to DISARM the populace, even though the Second Amendment to the Constitution prohibits them from doing that. Is there an ulterior motive there? Are they planning to “move on us” and want to reduce the possibility they will run into guns when they come to take what is not theirs? Their anti-gun laws, while they do tend to reduce the number of LEGAL guns there are in the hands of the law-abiding, do NOTHING to reduce the numbers of ILLEGAL guns already in the hands or the law BREAKERS. Who do they think they’re fooling? The ignorant, maybe, but certainly not people with the ability to THINK logically. The more LEGAL guns they take out of the equation, the easier it will be for them to victimize those who do obey their silly laws. They will never be able to do anything about those illegal guns out there, because they concentrate only on the LEGAL guns. They know those holding illegal guns won’t be a problem when thy come for our property because those holding illegal guns will be doing the same—just without the LAW to back them up. (Just common sense)

Judge Knows He's Wrong

The Obama-appointed judge in the Gen. Flynn case, went directly against the Constitution when he refused to accept the fact that the Justice Department had come to their senses and wanted to completely drop the case against the general because it was a set-up, from the word go. He insisted there be someone appointed to argue against it in court. Which gave him a chance to maybe refuse to drop the charges or, at least, prolong Gen. Flynn’s agony while eliminating the possibility of a suit. He has now taken the unusual step of hiring his own lawyer to represent him in a higher court. He knows his ruling was wrong, and now wants to be protected from the consequences of his actions. When has a judge ever needed a lawyer to defend his rulings? The Flynn case was a “house of cards” and only needed the release of a few documents the FBI wanted kept hidden to expose. It was based on Flynn lying by telling it what the FBI told him to say or see his son go through the same things to which they subjected him. I would have lied to God to save my kids from that fate, especially since they didn’t deserve it. (Just common sense)

Yahoo Censored Me

They have taken down my main web site in a very sneaky way. They refused my debit card, which I use every day without a problem. I tried and tried t pay the yearly fee to host my web site. I tried seven times, and each time they told me “there was a problem” with my debit card, but would not tell me what it was, giving me no opportunity to fix whatever problem there was. They sent me many messages telling me it was overdue, from “no reply” addresses, making it impossible for me to fix any problem that might have come up. I did reach them by phone once and they told me to go to their web site and “follow directions.” I did, with the same result. I don’t know if it was a conscious effort to censor me, but I have my suspicions. It does have that effect. My main web site has been taken down, and I haven’t been able to do anything about it. If Yahoo will just tell me what the “problem” is, I will fix it. In any case, I have a new persona; web site at

htts://raythomas101.weebly.com .

Silly Anti-Gun Ideas

The anti-gun fools come up with many silly ideas in support of their useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws. One of the silliest is the notion, by one state “lawmaker” (whose state I will not divulge, to keep from embarrassing them) who thinks the Second Amendment was written only for hunters and hunting. Another is that if background checks are instituted, there will no longer be “gun sales on the street.” How that politician thinks that will happen is not clear, as with all such ignorant comments. They think making somebody who fears being killed should WAIT until some nameless, faceless bureaucrat decided they’re waited long enough to get their gun to defend themselves is being made safer by that waiting period. Some time ago, a woman in Denver was threatened by an old boyfriend and tried to buy a gun. Faced with a mandatory waiting period, she went out and bought a gun “off the street,” illegally. A couple of days later she used that gun to kill the boyfriend when he came to kill her. She was not charged in his death, because it was a clear case of self defense. But she did spend some time in jail on illegal gun charges, but she’s still alive, which she would not be if she had sat back and waited until they “allowed” her to buy that gun legally. Which says to me, “Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.” (Just common sense)

Is bin Laden Really Dead?

Yes, the Obama administration did a good job of convincing this country his people killed bin Laden just before his re-election. But did he really? Or did he just set it up try to look like he did to give himself a boost in getting re-elected for another four years, so he could screw this country up even more? Some people say that’s true, but I don’t think so. I say that because since then, we haven’t heard a peep out of bin Laden, and if he were still alive the terrorists would be moving Heaven and Earth to prove it. Videos showing him, moving around, showing the front pages of newspapers with dates evident. There would be terrorist “events” done in his name. Everything they could to convince us we were lied to. Al Quida would be very active, and he would be very visible in every terrorist act. Yes, I believe bin Laden IS dead—maybe not at the hand of Obama’s agents. Maybe he got killed in some other way and Obama just took advantage of that. I notice they made quick work of getting rid of the body so nobody could perform an autopsy, saying they were “observing Muslim customs.” As if they should do so with a bloody murderer responsible for the deaths of many thousands of innocent people so he could make a political point. There had been an announcement at least ten days earlier in some newspapers that he had died of natural causes, since he was already in poor health. (American Thinker)

What Are They smoking?

If I were a stoner, I’d want some of what the anti-gun fools are smoking. They can’t really believe their silly little anti-gun laws that only apply to LEGAL gun owners will have ANY effect on law-breakers, who obey NO laws. So what is their purpose? They either have an ulterior motive in disarming most honest, law-abiding Americans, or they’re stupid. Or they’ve lost their minds—if they ever had one. They can’t think they can actually violate the Second amendment to the Constitution with impunity. It says, “[The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” How clear can you be? And the way to change that was designed to be difficult, so any would-be despot would have a helluva time disarming the people so he (or she) could “lord it over” us. So barring the possibility of a change to the Constitution, which is revered by all honest people, they don’t have a chance in hell to get around it with a simple gun ban. They’ve tried it, many times, and always failed. If they ever succeed, they will run into a brick wall. The American people will NEVER stand for a complete ban on buying and owning the means to self defense. Not when there are millions of ILLEGAL guns out there, in the hands of law-breakers. Are the anti-gun fools part of the law-breakers? Do they want to disarm us so they can victimize us? That remains to be seen. (Just common sense)

Detroit Getting Smarter

At least its police chief is. Detroit police Chief James E, Craig has come out and frankly SAID that “armed citizens deter crime.” A long time ago when he was a police chief in California, where it takes an “act of congress” to get a carry permit (and crime is sky high), he was denying cc permits every day. But when he got to Maine, where it is EASY to get a carry permit and crime was WAY down, he changed his tune. Now he’s in Detroit, and is, against all odds, thinking the same way. And by so thinking, may single-handedly reduce violent crime in “bankrupt city.” Craig says, “Maine is the safest place on Earth,” and puts it down to the ease with which honest people can get carry permits. It’s amazing, and demonstrates his superior intelligence, that he gets this connection, which most police politicians do not. (The Blaze)

"Put Up or Shut Up!"

Dumocrat “investigators” and non-investigators (anti-Trump politicians) are always confidently assuring us they “have clear and convincing evidence” of wrongdoing by President Trump. Bur they never tell us what it is, because there isn’t any. They just want you to believe there is. Whenever I hear one say that, I want to tell him/her to “put up or shut the hell up!” “Pencil Neck” Adam Schiff is the worst one doing this First it was the “Russian Collusion.” then when they couldn’t prove that, it became “obstruction of justice.” When they couldn’t produce proof of that, they looked around for something else they could accuse him of. Then President Trump did what he has the authority to do and fired several Obama-appointed Inspectors General and they’re “off to the races” again. When they can’t prove anything there, they’ll come up with something else. They’ll still be trying to get him on SOMETHING long after he has left office in 2024. Jerry Nadler is another fool who tells us all about having evidence against Trump, but he too, cannot produce it. “Mad Max”ine Waters is always telling us about “Trump’s crimes” while she funnels campaign cash to her daughter. I’m getting tired of hearing it. We need to “retire” these fools, and more. There IS no “evidence of wrongdoing” by Trump. So they’d better put up or shut up. (Just common sense)

"Cops Can Protect You!"

“So turn in your guns. You don’t need them.” WRONG! At least, in Detroit, where the cops can take from 12 minutes to DAYS to respond. Meanwhile, you’re on your own. So either get a gun, or run and hide—if you can. The bad guys don’t have any trouble getting the guns they use to victimize you. And Detroit is not the only city with horrible response times for the cops to come when called. It’s a growing problem, nationwide. Maybe not as bad (yet) as in Detroit, but even a few minutes can make all the difference to people who are disarmed, for the most part, by their government—IF they are law-abiding, and actually OBEY laws. Some police agencies boast response times of three minutes (sometimes). But a bad guy with an ILLEGAL gun can kill a lot of people in three minutes if not opposed by someone else with a gun. At the risk of being visited by the cops (of some kind) for advocating illegality, even if such speech is protected by the First Amendment, I will say, probably the best course is to get a gun, any way you can, so you can effectively defend yourself because it’s “better to be judged by 12 rather than carried by 6.” (WXYZ Channel 7)

NASCAR and the Second

The liberal media is making a big thing of a NASCAR team being sponsored by a promoter of the Second Amendment. Like that makes them nasty—or something. Truth is, NASCAR people are big supporters of the Second Amendment, and it is a good move for that team. The Second Amendment is a GOOD THING, since it makes politicians who think they should control everything, and all of us, in everything we do (like AOC) think twice before going too far in controlling us. It is a known fact that would-be dictators always disarm their citizens to make them easier to control. On the side of the race truck is an “in-your-face” picture of Donald Trump as “The Punisher,” which is what he is—at least for the “swamp” dwellers. NASCAR people also tend to be Trump supporters too, which makes that simply something funny to them, and a “slap in the face” to liberals—which can only be good. This sponsorship is guaranteed to “trigger” all liberals, who tend to be in favor of taking your guns away, and triggering liberals, anywhere, can only be a good thing. I try and do it, every day. And they’re so EASY to “trigger!” (Story Warrant)

"Islamophobia"

Militant Muslims have come up with a phony word to blunt ANY criticism of any Muslim, anywhere, ever, without having to answer the criticism. The phony word is “Islamophobia,” and it imputes some kind of mental insufficiency into the critic. This way they don’t have to come up with answers to criticisms of their sometimes strange actions, and even deadly ones. Well, I can come up with phony words of my own. Mine is “NonIslamophobia,” which imputes a mental aberration into any criticism by a militant Muslim to anybody NOT a Muslim. Something to which all militant Muslims are prone. Now notice I append the word “militant” onto that, which shows that this is not a criticism of all Muslims, although all are taught, by their “Bible,” the Koran, to do so. I don’t agree with many of the teachings in their religion, but that’s their business, as long as they don’t try and impose their beliefs and practices on me. Gays have their own phony word in “homophobia,” and is designed to do the same: impute a somehow mental aberration onto any body criticizing gays, for any reason. I predict there will be many more phony words created, and the purpose will be the same: to blunt any criticism of a certain group of people without the bother of answering their criticism. (Just common sense)

Wet Pants Liberals

They hate what President Trump did in “bringing justice” to a bloody terrorist, operating under the protection of the Iran government. A man responsible for hundreds and hundreds of deaths—including many Americans, who was planning yet more atrocities. They completely underestimate our ability to “drop Iran like a pair of dirty pants,” and overestimate Iran’s ability to hurt us. Like the terrorists, they ignore all the provocations of the past, done by that general and his cohorts. They like to operate as if Trump’s action in “taking out” that general was the first bit of violence that occurred, some even trying to paint that general as a “peaceful poet” more interested in his poetry than anything else. They actually think Iran is strong enough to actually hurt us in any big way. Yes, they do have nukes. But if they use them, they will cease to exist, because we have nukes, too. Many more than they have, and we are much better at knowing how to use them. And we will know the very minute one is launched in our direction, and we have the ability to shoot it down before it gets near us—an ability they do not have, which will mean “death to Iran.” There’s a MAN in the White House now, not a wimp like Obama. We will not reward them with pallets of dollars like he did. If they go too far, we will “take them out.” (Just common sense)

Can't Talk About Guns

Isn’t this supposed to be a free country with a First Amendment to protect our right to speak about ANYTHING, and express ANY opinion, even if it is opposite to someone else’s? Apparently they don’t think so in New Jersey, where they’re trying to pass a law to stop anybody from talking about, writing about, or publishing anything relating to 3D printed guns. That sounds like a law they’d have passed in communist Russia! Not in the United States of America. I find it hard to believe that legislators there are so arrogant that hey can blithely pass a law that is in complete contravention to the Constitution, to which ALL LAWS must conform. That’s the LAW. The Constitution is the very BASIS for ALL our laws, and it cannot be ignored in making ANY laws. The Second Amendment Foundation is suing New Jersey Attorney General Gurbig Gruwal to prevent this law from being made, and unless they come before an ultra-liberal judge, should win. Of course, Gruwal, a Sikh, is a Dumocrat, who probably doesn’t even understand our Constitution and the way we make laws. (World Net Daily)

Nothing New Today

I spent the afternoon with my doctor today and when I got home I was wiped out. I just don’t have the energy for new posts, so there won’t be any until tomorrow. Sorry.

"There's No Damned Money!"

At least one Dumocrat congressman went on the Floor and gave an impassioned speech criticizing Republicans for saying “there was no money” when they criticized Peelosi’s $3 trillion dollar giveaway program just passed in the House. He then asked them, “What world are you living in?” The answer to that is simple. “The real world.” There IS no money. Just the interest on the National Debt would keep most countries going for a long time. That’s BORROWED money, congressman! We borrowed it because Dumocrats spent all the money we had, and then some—and now they’re doing it, again. But hopefully, wiser heads will prevail when that measure reaches the Senate, and the bill will be dumped in the garbage where it belongs. The bill is touted as being “help for the unemployed,” but all it is, is Peelosi’s “wish list” of money to support her giveaway programs that will lead us to socialism. We’d better get rid of this bi—er, witch. She has already bankrupted us, and now she wants to dig us even deeper. (Clash Daily)

Stupid Comparisons

They don’t have any meaningful arguments to support “gun control,” so they just demonize their opposition. So it is with the Washington Post, who recently, without any kind of proof of anything, compared gun sanctuaries to slavery. What kind of fool thinking is responsible for that, I don’t know. Nobody’s being forced to do anything in those “gun sanctuaries.” They have only been designated as such by a majority of the people who wish to maintain their right to be armed for self defense, and not DISARMED by stupid politicians, and made to be defenseless. They know that each and every anti-gun law is unconstitutional for a simple reason: The second Amendment is very simple and easy to understand if you’re not a fool. It says, “The Right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Of course the anti-gun fools try and misunderstand it because of the preceding words about am “organized militia,” which did not even exist at the time of the writing pf the Constitution, and really have no meaning, since at the time, they included ALL THE PEOPLE in any such “organized militia,” if one was to be organized. The government, at that time, was not “flush with money” as it is now, and wanted them to bring their own guns when called up. In any case, there is no real comparison with any kind of slavery in those “sanctuaries.” Those laws are unconstitutional because they “infringe” upon those rights. (Washington Examiner)