"Kids Killed at Night Club!"

That’s how the headline reads. But there are some glaring inconsistencies in this story. First of all, it was NOT a “night club.” It was a restaurant that had a limited alcohol sales license. It was a “dance party” and they were NOT serving liquor to underage people. It was NOT a case of a “mass shooter” who came in and started killing people. It was a GANG MEMBER who started shooting at other gang members, while people in the event shot back. What? Sounds to me like many of the attendees were armed gang members, too. It was a gang fight. And calling most of these people KIDS is a falsity, since they call them “kids” up to 19! A 19 year old is NOT a “kid.” He/she is an ADULT who has not yet quite reached 21. Even members of “MOMS Against Guns (or something like that)” are casting doubt on the reports, and that’s unusual. Usually they jump right on ANY story about people shooting one another and try to paint it in the worst way. (Gun Free Zone)

It's All Iran's Fault

There are some people trying valiantly to blame President Trump for the downing of that Ukrainian passenger plane and killing 176 innocent people. Mostly American liberals (Dumocrats) who hate President Trump on general principles. But they are joined by Canada’s liberal Prime Minister, as well. All are straining reasoning to a breaking point to think Trump is responsible for Iran allowing that plane to take off while being on full alert for an air attack that did not come, and was not promised if they restrained themselves and didn’t respond to the killing of that pseudo general/Islamic terrorist by killing more Americans. The responsibility is absolutely and completely that of Iran. Trump had nothing to do with it. The killing of that 176 innocent people would not have happened if Iran hadn’t had such a “hair-trigger” over possible attacks that were not coming because Trump keeps his words and told them clearly that if they did not kill any Americans in their “revenge” strikes on American property he would not respond. They do not keep their promises and, like American liberals, think Trump does not, either. If they had not allowed that commercial airliner to take off under those conditions, those 176 innocent people would not have perished. And that mistake was made worse by their “hair-trigger” shooting it down without even checking to see if it was, in fact, an attack. They cannot successfully twist facts to blame Trump for something for which he has NO blame. (Just common sense)

Restricting Freedom of Speech?

That’s what their supporters are calling Israel’s initial refusal to let Israel-hater Members of Congress in to visit one of their grandmothers. But it is NOT. First of all, Israel is not bound to respect the “freedom of speech” rights under the United states Constitution, and they are entitled to bar those who hate Israel and want it destroyed from entering. The way these bit… er, witches work, they might even be bringing in the means FOR the destruction of Israel, no matter what “offices” they hold in America. They are Palestinian partisans, and at least one IS a Palestinian. You know, the bunch who rocket bombs Israel every day? Of course, when Israel immediately relented, and said they would allow them in if they agreed to some conditions, they said, “Forget it. We don’t want to come, anymore. Screw you.” Then they set out to vilify Israel for their initial refusal. The whole thing was a set-up. They never wanted to go, in the first place. They just wanted to make trouble. that’s what these bimbos do best. That’s all they’ve been doing, ever since gullible voters elected them to offices they aren’t intelligent enough to hold. Dumocrat Senator and presidential candidate Tim Kane told Israel to “reverse your Muslim ban.” One little problem. A large part of Israel’s population are Muslims, and so is Tlaib’s grandmother. Their original refusal came after they found the whole trip was to cause trouble for Israel, IN Israel, and they didn’t want that. Only problem is, these witches can cause trouble wherever they are. They’re really good at causing trouble. Frankly, I’d like to see them go, and not let them back in. We’d be better off for it. (Legal Insurrection)

"Take Their Guns!"

There seem to be politicians everywhere who think they have the right to take guns away from their constituents. They even campaign on passing “tougher gun laws.” Never mind their anti-gun laws never work, and even PROMOTE “gun crime by DISARMING the law-abiding. Meanwhile these selfsame politicians hide behind a cordon of ARMED “security.” Some of them even carry their own guns, as Sen. Diane Feinstein did, in addition to her “security” troops. They think they are somehow supremely entitled to such “protection” while working hard to DENY the rest of us the same rights. So what we need to do is deny THEM the right to self defense if they take a single vote against our retention of our constitutionally-guaranteed right to be armed for self defense. I know getting such a law passed would be difficult, because the very people it would expose to their enemies would have to vote it in. We can only hope there are sufficient politicians with honor to get it done. That may be a forlorn hope, but maybe not. There’s a law in Congress right now to do just that—except it goes a little too far, and wants to stop ALL members of Congress from having protection. But it IS a “step in the right direction,” as Dumocrats are fond of saying. (Daily Caller)

Pre-Existing Conditions

Dumocrat politicians are in the process of demonizing people who don’t like the idea of say, being diagnosed with a serious and expensive illness like cancer, THEN buying health insurance. That turns it into WELFARE, not insurance. That is a socialist scheme, something that, if you agree with, is a “gateway” to full-blown socialism, just as pot is a “Gateway” to more serious drug use. It is WRONG, and depends, like all socialism, on TAKING money from those who EARN it for the benefit of those who do NOT. That is the basic definition of socialism. Socialism is just one form of collectivism. Others are communism, which has already failed in many places, progressivism, which is what Dumocrats call it here, and Fascism, which was mostly defeated when Mussolini was killed in WWII. Collectivism is an evil scam to gain power over as many people as possible because, if you’re paying for things (government), you get to make the rules. Lenin used it to take over the government in Russia which, I admit, had a despot before him. They just traded one despot for another, which led to millions of people being murdered by the state. Socialism is even now in the process of collapsing in Venezuela, where people are eating dog food because they can’t get anything else, and there is no toilet paper on store shelves, so many trees have been stripped of their leaves to substitute. People are starving, and resorting to eating their animals. This is the end result of collectivism in all its forms. Death and destruction. I see collectivism coming, in a wave. Which is why I’m glad I won’t be around much longer and will miss most of it as we go the same route as Russia and Venezuela did. (Just common sense)

Gettin' Harder and Harder

Liberals are trying very hard to create a recession. Recessions are caused by people losing faith in the economy. They’re trying to “whip one up,” but with the economy booming so well, it’s hard. The market hits ever higher new record highs, and they talk about “a bubble,” wanting to make us think the current economic boom is “just a bubble and is not “sustainable.” Unfortunately for them, this boom economy is based on reality and id thus not subject to a “bubble,” as the earlier liberal economy was. No matter what good things are happening, the liberals are always there with their “gloom and doom” scare tactics. They desperately want a recession before the 2020 elections, so they can blame it on President Trump. Or at least what APPEARS to be a recession. But the “Trump boom” is real, based on reality, and that means a recession is not going to come, at least, not during Trump’s administration, so they won’t be able to blame Trump for anything. And as all the “indicators” are rising (or falling, as in the case with unemployment), it becomes harder and harder for them to CREATE a recession, since everybody who is doing something about earning their own living is doing fine, nobody believes their scare tactics. (News Busters)

"Shooting Fish In A Barrell"

Making the anti-gun fools out to be the fools they are is so easy it’s like “shooting fish in a barrel.” They constantly confidently assure us that legal defensive use of a gun never happens. But it never phases them. Then it happens so many times it’s hard to keep up with them. For instance, in one place just today there are stories about THREE different cases of just that happening: in Altoona, PA, a retired Marine stopped a mass shooting in a bar; in Ft. worth, TX, a homeowner shoots an intruder; and in Wayne County, W VA, a woman put a stop to an attempted home invasion with her legally-owned gun. And these are not nearly the only instances that happened recently. They are just the ones I personally took note of. They happen MILLIONS of times every year, and anti-gun fools try very hard to ignore them, while assuring us it never happens. They think if more Americans are armed for self defense, they MIGHT shoot each other over trifles. All their arguments are based on what MIGHT happen, rather than on what WILL happen, which is the user of an ILLEGAL gun will fail to victimize a law-abiding person, and maybe even get killed in the attempt—which will “reduce gun crime,” one criminal at a time. (Just common sense)

Unconstitutional Laws

There are a plethora of unconstitutional laws being enforced daily on an unsuspecting population. This is due to a major error the Founders made in writing the Constitution by not providing a PUNISHMENT for legislators making unconstitutional laws. There needs to be a “tribunal” created before which legislators at all levels must present their proposed laws BEFORE they can be voted into law to which they must convince their proposed law CONFORMS to the Constitution. Unconstitutional laws now can be ENFORCED, sometimes for YEARS, until someone finally takes them to the supreme Court, and that Court rules—long after much damage has been done.

People are ruined, money “confiscated (stolen), lives ruined, all due to a law that IS unconstitutional. One such class of laws are the anti-gun laws. They are ALL unconstitutional. The Constitution says, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall NOT be infringed.” Each and every anti-gun law INFRINGES upon that right, and should be declared unconstitutional as soon as the Supreme Court gets around to it. And they should not wait until somebody ponies up enough money to take it to the Supreme Court. They should do it on their own initiative. Another class of laws that are unconstitutional are the RICO Laws, which were PASSED for an unconstitutional purpose—that of denying drug dealers, who are “flush with money” their right to a competent defense.

The way they’re written, the government can move in and TAKE their money, on the “SUSPICION” that their money MIGHT have been gotten illegally. And enforcement of those laws has devolved now to the point that you could lose your car if you get a ticket! “Government agents” (legal thieves) set up on a street corner with a gadget that can find out if you have enough cash on you to make it worth while to steal it, and use the RICO laws to do it. There is now a strip on every bill that broadcasts its existence and they can count your money without even stopping you. Then there are the “ex post facto” laws—or laws that take effect BEFORE they become law! In spite of the fact that the Constitution says “no ex post facto laws shall be made,” they are made, all the time, and enforced. (Just common sense)

"Boycott, Boycott, Boycott!"

That’s all the Dumocrats have when someone displeases them. Call for a boycott, since they can’t get any laws passed to eliminate any criticism of their stupidities. Rhashida Tlaib called for a boycott of Israel because they wouldn’t let her in if she wouldn’t agree to no political speeches there. Bill Maher called out her BS, so now she wants a boycott of him. That silly teenage gun control fool, David Hogg, has called for many boycotts in his “spotted career,” most of which have gone nowhere—and most will suffer the same fate. You can always tell when Dumocrats run out of insults. They call for a boycott. Dumocrats are calling for foreign governments to stop using Trump’s hotels. And they really think foreign governments give a damn about their calls for boycotts. They want to boycott Home Depot after its co-founder promised to donate money to Trump’s re-election campaign. Then, after Joaquin Castro “outed” some Trump donors, calls came for boycotts of the Bill Miller restaurant chain and the Pearl Entertainment District, two of Trump’s donors. Like it’s some kind of a crime to support the president. California Dumocrats are calling for a boycott of “In-And-Out Burgers after they contributed $25,000.00 to the Republicans. Boycotts seem to be the automatic response to ANYTHING the Dumocrats don’t like. As if the voters cared what the Dumocrats don’t like. That shows a certain lack of originality among Dumocrats. We know they’re not very original, since they’re constantly reviving old, tired things that didn’t work the first time. But this “boycott fever” confirms it. (Washington Examiner)

It's Always Trump's Fault

Yes, President Trump did create the safety commission after the killings at Marjory Stoneman High School. But when Trump’s Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos, was asked if guns would be a subject, she rightly replied, “Not necessarily.”For that, the Washington Post is criticizing her. Never mind the unalterable fact that no amount of gun control has EVER stopped a single mass shooter from killing his victims. “Gun-free zones” are an “engraved invitation” to would-be shooters, and past mass shooters have confidently told us they SEEK OUT such zones in which to do their dirty work because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding people there will not be armed, and thus will be completely DEFENSELESS. Background checks likewise, because all they can do is help the cops find such a shooter AFTER he commits a crime, IF he got his gun legally and stood for a background check. Anti-gun laws ONLY apply to the law-abiding, who are NOT the problem, as a rule. That is the fatal flaw in the thinking of all anti-gun fools, and that’s why I call them FOOLS. The “black children to which they refer are mostly teenagers, up to 19, and members of street gangs, all of whom cannot buy a gun legally already, but all are illegally armed when they kill each other. (Washington Post)

A Waste of Time

The Congress is “apologizing” to Iran for the killing of terrorist “general” Soleimani by passing a NON-BINDING resolution saying they “didn’t approve” of President Trump’s action in having him killed. This, of course, sends a message to Iran that there MIGHT be enough opposition to Trump’s acts to allow them to kill a few more Americans. It actually gives them hope. It empowers them, in their minds. They probably don’t understand the fact it is NON-BINDING and has no meaning. It “has no teeth.” President Trump can still do what he wants, without having to inform Congress—unless, of course, he declares all-out war on Iran, in which case he WILL go to Congress for approval. Of course, when he does that, he will have evidence that is undeniable that war is needed to deal with them. In cases like the killing of this “general,” he not only needs no “approval” from Congress, nor even to tell them, ahead of time. And that’s only proper. If he had gone to Congress for approval, that “leaking sieve” would have leaked the information and Soleimani would have been warned, and “gone underground and done his “dirty work” from hiding, like other terrorists. Killing Soleimani was like taking out a tank. Or a machine gun nest. It was necessary to save American lives, and the Dumocrats are not only stupid for opposing it, they are subversive. (BBC News)

Piss-Poor Politics

That’s what Joaquin Castro engaged in when he “outed” Trump supporters, as if donating money to the President of the United States was some kind of a crime. But it appear as if, to some Dumocrats, it is, because some of those so “outed” are being harassed by other stupid Dumocrats. It has really come to this, huh? That “exposing” certain political donors can cause them to be harassed by their opponents, rather than just opposed politically. Such “exposure” could even result in some physical injury if some of those “unhinged Dumocrats” think they have the right to physically attack people who don’t agree with their politics. And there have been such dummies among Dumocrat supporters. Several who actually walked up to a conservative/Republican and punched him in the face. Others attacked a news photographer and put him in the hospital. Such people should never be elected to ANY office. But that’s what politics have come to, today, as “Trump hatred” has come to the fore. Yes, you’re not supposed to like your opponent, but the Dumocrats are carrying it just a little bit too far. No, not a “little bit,” a LOT too far. (Just common sense)

Today's Gun Save

Anti-gun fools say it never happens. They say concealed carriers are more likely to shoot themselves than anybody else. They say that the average person carrying a gun NEVER is able to stop violence from being committed. They're WRONG, as usual. And today's “gun save” proves it, yet again. In Wayne County, W. VA, some people claiming to have presents tried to enter Jerrica Little’s home. She knew something was wrong when the woman who told her she has qualified for some free presents couldn’t tell her from whom they came, and a scruffy man in bib coveralls got out of their van looking menacing. Jerrica shut her door and told the woman she had a gun and was calling 9/11. They got back in their van and left. Just the fear that she actually had a gun frightened them off, from what could have been a “home invasion” attack. These things happen millions of times a year, but the anti-gun fools still deny it. (WDTV)

"Tit for tat"

Iran has “vowed revenge” for the attack that killed a murderous Islamic terrorist operating under the title of a general in the Iran military—I’m not sure what branch, nobody ever said. It’s as if there was absolutely no history of atrocities on THEIR part in the many years before this. Benhghazi didn’t happen. They didn’t murder four embassy people there, including our ambassador, whom they “dragged through the streets” half naked. They didn’t shoot down a million dollar American drone over territory not theirs. No. We didn’t have ANY valid reason to actually strike back in their minds. So they’re planning God knows what for “revenge” against our revenge against their many attacks and provocations, which will cause us to mount more attacks, and so on. On and on, into the future—unless we eventually “take them out,” something we hesitate to do because that would mean killing many innocent Iranian citizens who are not involved in their perfidy. But we can only be pushed so far, and it seems like they are determined to push us into a war they cannot win. I don’t know why. Maybe the Mullahs have a death wish. Maybe they mistakenly think they can win. They cannot. And they will find that out if they continue. (Just common sense)

"Just Lie About Him"

That seems to be the rule for the so-called “mainstream media” these days when trying to find something negative to “report” about President Trump. One oh, so obvious attempt was made by MSNBC anchor Nichole Wallace, who said Trump “talked about exterminating Latinos.” USA Today columnist Raul Reyes says “Trump has declared open season on Latinos.” Both of which are outright LIES. And the liberal media talks incessantly about Trump’s “violent rhetoric,” when there is none. Although there is a lot of it on the Dumocrat side, which the liberal media ignores. They can’t find any bad quotes, so they just make them up, and insist they are true quotes in the face of sure evidence they are false. This is the quality of the news media these days, with one or two differences. I stopped reading newspapers some time ago, and I take what I see on the Internet with a large “grain of salt.” Same with cable and broadcast news. I believe NOTHING they tell me until I have researched it from sources I trust. (Legal Insurrection)

The Definition Of Insanity

Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the very definition of insanity. So why do the anti-gun fools do it? There is not a single law, now on the books, that has ever stopped, or even slowed down “gun crime.” So why do they insist on continuing to make them? Are they INSANE? Or just STUPID? Example: “gun-free zones.” Criminals SEEK OUT “gun-free zones” in which to do their “dirty work” because they can be pretty sure the law-a biding (their intended victims) will not be armed, and thus will be DEFENSELESS against their ILLEGAL guns. Anti-gun fools have to know these silly laws do not work, and are in fact, an “engraved invitation” to criminals to bring their illegal guns to victimize the law-abiding. You ask them why they keep making silly laws like that, and they never answer. They HAVE no coherent answer, so they immediately start calling you names and dismissing you, out of hand. What’s WRONG with these people? It can’t be lack of intelligence, because many of these fools are otherwise intelligent. But they just can’t se the contradiction in making these USELESS laws. Baltimore’s “gun buyback” didn’t work, so they’re going to do it, again. (CBS Baltimore)

Poop In the Streets

No, this isn’t satire. There is enough human sh-t in the streets of San Francisco that they have made MAPS to show where the piles are, so you can avoid those areas. I have seen one of those maps, and there is only one small area in the northwest area that seems to be free of sh-tpiles in the streets. This is what you get when liberals run things long enough. And that’s not their only major problem. Another “pesky problem” they can’t seem to handle is “the homeless.” I call them BUMS, but I’m “old fashioned.” Many of them are people with mental issues not handled by the liberals in charge. Others are just people who want to live at the expense of others, but don’t like the rules that come along with it, as a rule. So they’d rather live in a cardboard box on somebody else’s property and crap in the streets. These problems are not limited to San Francisco. They are there in ALL cities that are run by liberals, who are good at getting elected, but lousy at governing. Los Angeles has a similar “homeless” problem. But maybe the bums are better at hiding their sh-tpiles—or not. But the problem is not with the “homeless.” It’s with the incompetent governing of liberals everywhere. (Business Insider)

More Violent Politics

Showing just how stupid Dumocrats are, Dumocrat Rep. Joaquin Castro, who thinks he’s smart enough to be president, outed one of his own donors because he also donated to President Trump. That’s hilarious. But more importantly, he is condoning political violence by “outing” Trump’s donors, which tacitly tells them to do the same as what a bunch of Dumocrat supporters did the other day at Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s home the other day, gathering outside his home and suggesting that somebody ought to “cut his throat.” If they think that just might not inspire some misfit to try just that, they’re more ignorant than I thought. And I’m sure these misfits would cheer loudly if somebody did just that. I wrote the other day about Dumocrat fools who walk up and punch conservatives in the face because they disagree with their politics. And then there are the ANTIFA goons, who put on their masks to hide their identities and go out to do violence on Republicans/conservatives, as their predecessor, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) did against blacks last century. Even the majority leader in the House has advocated violence on those who disagreed with her politics, and that’s a shame. She should be arrested for making a “terroristic threat,” as I would, if I made a similar threat against her. (Legal Insurrection)

Typical Liberal Lie

All liberals are not anti-gun fools, although MOST of them are. And liberals routinely lie, in one way or another, to get their way. One way they lie in the “gun control controversy” is to include ADULTS up to 19 years of age in their “CHILDREN” statistics when they talk about “children being shot.” Those figures then include GANG MEMBERS, all of whom are illegally armed, since they’re too young to even be able to buy a gun legally. Then they go out and kill each other, and many innocent passers-by who happen to get in the way of their badly-aimed bullets. Such “twisting the numbers” should be a prison offense. They KNOW they are lying, but they do it on purpose, to get their way, since they have nothing REAL to offer. Anti-gun laws don’t work. It’s as simple as that. But they refuse to believe it, and LIE to make us believe them. For this reason, we need to examine what's behind every figure they give us to find the lie behind the ways they want to fool us. Never believe their figures without detailed examination, and you’ll find they lie every time. (Breitbart)

They Screwed Up, Bad

Iran thought they could attack our embassy like they did at Benghazi, with impunity, since then President Obama did nothing to either stop, or avenge the deaths of four embassy personnel, including the ambassador, himself, and in fact, LIED to the American people as to the cause. But they miscalculated badly. President Trump is a “different animal” than was Obama. He struck back, decisively, after blunting their embassy attack with an instant US Marine defense. He killed their top general, which is a big loss to them. If they try to “avenge” the death of this general, they’re in big trouble, because President Trump won’t hesitate to put a missile, or a bunch of missiles, into places their top dogs are known to be—and if they think we don’t know where they are at every minute of the day, they are in for a rude awakening. But that awakening won’t last long, because they’ll be dead. You don’t “tug on Superman’s cape,” or bite at Trump’s ankles—not if you’re smart. (Flag and Cross)

Police Ignore Danger

They do that on a regular basis. They take any excuse to avoid investigation when a potential mass killer gives advance evidence of his probable anti-social actions that may lead to a mass shooting. In one case a man who gave evidence he, as a Muslim, hated America and thought Americans should be killed, then went out and killed a few on a military base where he had previously been employed as a “counselor.” In this case, the shooter’s own mother “OUTED” him to the cops because she was worried when he bought an “assault-style” rifle. She was worried that he had bought that rifle because she knew him to be a vocal white supremacist, and not too stable in his thinking. Turns out she was absolutely right in HER thinking. It must have taken a lot out of her to do what she did, and be ignored by those who should know better. She didn’t give her name, or the name of her son, and the cops didn’t bother to ask. Neither did they bother to spend one minute investigating. That’s just lazy police “work.” They should have at least investigated. Maybe they would have uncovered something that would have allowed them to stop him before he committed his outrage. It’s time the cops took some time investigating people who gave “signals” they might be a danger so they can at least be monitored. Just being legally able to buy a gun is no reason for the cops to ignore a clear warning. (Daily Mail)

Background Checks Don't work

“Last year, thousands of people trying to buy guns from dealers made false statements about their past on the required federal form, then went on to fail the background check due to a serious criminal record or other disqualifier. Lying to a licensed gun dealer is a felony punishable by a fine or up to 10 years in prison. But an ATF study showed that, in 12,710 cases of background check denials where the applicants LIED—which is a felony—only 12 were prosecuted for lying on their application. If there is no prosecution for lying, what is there to keep applicants FROM lying? In 2016, an internal ATF briefing paper showed that those who lie on their applications are far more likely to commit a gun crime than those who are honest. The “authorities” think lying on their application is such a minor crime they rarely prosecute it. But more prosecutions would “send a message” to future liars that they won’t get away with it. Of course, the fact that most potential criminal shooters don’t even bother to buy their guns legally, thereby bypassing a background check is not even mentioned by anti-gun fools. But it is a major factor, and one that should be considered. (CNN)

Not Trump's Benghazi

The left is trying their best to make the embassy attack in Iraq into “Trump’s Benghazi,” without success. Why? Because trump did not react by ignoring it and refusing to send help. Or by LYING about the cause of the attack. He did what a true leader would do. He sent in the Marines, who quickly stopped the attack. As soon as the Marines arrived, the attack ended, the attackers withdrew, and peace returned. that’s the difference between a real leader and a pretend leader, as Obama was. Obama wouldn’t even admit there WAS an Islamic terrorist danger. He did as LITTLE as possible to fight Islamic terrorism. He even had the leader of this attack as his guest in the white House once. I think he is a SYMPATHIZER to Islamic terrorism. His very actions toward Islamic terrorism speaks volumes on that score. And the left is right with him, in that they minimized the effect of Islamic terrorism as much as they could, and mocked Trump’s efforts as much as possible. But Trump has shown what a true leader will do when attacked, and those attackers, and their leaders, will PAY. Count on it.(Clash Daily)

Damn, What Stupidity!

East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania “knuckled under” to a bunch of stupid “activists,” and shut down their police department, firing all the cops. The politicians shut down the “cop shop,” leaving police duties to the State Police, whose nearest station is 30 miles away. That’s in response to a police shooting they tried valiantly to make into murder, but the court was smarter than that, and found the cops involved not guilty. The result? No police presence most of the time. One mother called the cops and waited AN HOUR for them to arrive. Of course, none of this reduced the need for a real police presence, not an occasional State Police patrol once in a while. The criminals were emboldened and, guess what? Crime increased, as the police presence disappeared. The shutting down of the police force was a short-sighted thing, and only added to their problems. And there is no telling how many people are going to die as a result. One can only hope they come to their senses and reopen the “cop shop.” Oh, by the way, those “activists” who got the police force fired are gone. They don’t live in East Pittsburgh. They don’t care. (Truth About Guns)

Anti-Gun Fool Plans

“Crazy Nancy” Peelosi is promising their major push in congress after they become the majority party in the House (fat chance) will be gun control. Their focus groups have decided that the Republicans only lost enough seats in the House to give control back to Dumocrats because of their stance against gun control. I don’t see how they figure that, since it is a proven fact that a MAJORITY of Americans believe the right to be armed for self defense to be sacrosanct. This is another case of them repeating a lie over and over so it will become accepted as “true.” Meanwhile, not a single one of their highly touted anti-gun laws have done a single thing to “reduce gun violence, and nobody has been able to come up with a single law that will. If you ask an anti-gun fool about that, they have no answer. So they immediately start calling you names, like “gun nut” or “NRA member.” (used as an insult) Their favorite anti-gun law is the creation of “gun-free zones” where, they think, nobody, including law breakers, will being their guns. But law breakers don’t obey laws. That’s why they are called law breakers. They actually SEEK OUT gun-free zones in which to do their dirty work because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding will not be armed there, and will be “easy targets.” (Bearing Arms)

"Trump Bungled Iraq"

That’s what one liberal (whose name I will nor speak) said after Iran Militia members attacked our embassy in Iraq, doing much damage, but (maybe) no deaths because of the interference by the Marines). There doesn’t seem to be a day that goes by that some liberal doesn’t say or do something that infuriates me, but this is one of the worst. And the most stupid. Trump did NOT “bungle Iraq.” OBAMA bungled Iraq. And Afghanistan, when he announced he was “pulling out” in both countries, leaving hundreds, maybe thousands of people to die at the hands of the same kind of terrorists who sponsored this attack. That led to the upsurge in terrorism in both countries, and many deaths and injuries of innocent people to prove a point. Up to now, the worse thing, in my opinion, was their effort to take credit for the massive economy boost TRUMP created, when Obama had given up so badly he told us “The good times are OVER. Get used to it.”Trump will see to it those responsible for this atrocity will “pay then piper.” Unlike Obama’s response to Benghazi, of NO response, and even LYING about the cause. Liberals are constantly criticizing Trump for one thing or another, mostly things that are good for us, and they could not, or WOULD not accomplish. Trump is about the most accomplished president in memory, which infuriates liberals, who hate him to their core. (Just common sense)

Not "Alleged" Discrimination

A white professor is suing a “historically black college” for what they call “alleged” discrimination. But that college is not guilty of “alleged” discrimination, it is guilty or REAL discrimination. The proof of that is in the students it accepts. All black. No whites. White students are not even CONSIDERED for enrollment, only black students. If that is not discrimination, I don’t know what is. There should have never been established a college for black students only. The very concept is discriminatory and racist—against white people. I know liberals don’t consider discrimination against white people to be racism, but it is. Marshall Burns, who has been a professor at Tuscegee University for many years, is paid 30 to 50 percent LESS than many younger, less experienced professors. His pay is equal to that of an associate professor (a lesser position) while much younger people get salaries equal to full professor. Many requests for better pay have been ignored. Clearly discrimination. (Legal Insurrection)

"Acting Boldly and Decisively"

The Dumocrats, basking in their newfound power in the House, promise to “act boldly and decisively on new gun laws.” Never mind they don’t work worth a damn to reduce gun crime. They want to pass even more USELESS gun laws that only make it easier for the bad guys to victimize the good guys by DISARMING the good guys. That this causes many deaths of innocent people doesn’t seem to bother them. They just want to keep on making these laws, in spite of the fact that they are not only INEFFECTIVE, they PROMOTE gun crime. I don’t know what drives these imbeciles to do that. Are they just STUPID? Or do they have an ulterior motive? I think they have an ulterior motive. To disarm the population and make it easier for the government to oppress them. Politicians always want “total power,” even if they deny it. While denying it, they work assiduously to gain it. That already have a good start in the RICO Laws, ostensibly passed to take away the money they use to defend themselves in court. An unconstitutional wish on it’s face, but one they use all the time. They don’t even have to convict you of a crime to take all your money if they “think” you got that money illegally. This, in effect, denies you the right to an effective defense, something to which we are all entitled, under the Constitution. (The Hill)