Rockets Into Tel Aviv

Looks like the Palestinians have fired some more of their incessant rockets. This time into Tel Aviv. Until now they’ve only fired them into places close to the border between the two. But now, with them firing them into a major population center, it’s going to require a major response. And it’s time they did make a major response to the terrorism they have been suffering from the Palestinian Muslim terrorists. It’s a mystery to me why they haven’t just gone on and cleaned out the Palestinian terrorists before. If somebody had fired rockets into the US, it would have happened a long time ago. The Palestinians have been asking for it for a long time, and I think they ought to get it. Their claims to the land Israel has allowed them to live on are bogus, to begin with. And their rocket attacks have made them even more bogus, requiring a major response—which I think will come soon. If it doesn’t, I will be very disappointed. They need to be “taken out” before they can kill any more innocent people. And to hell with what “the world” thinks. The Israel government has had a lot more patience than I would have had, for sure. If Israel was run by Trump, the Palestinians would have ceased to exist before now. (New York Times)

Just the Beginning

Muslim extremists can’t beat us on the battlefield, and the number of Muslim extremist corpses tells the tale. So now they’re going to infiltrate our law-making bodies, little by little, and take over from within. And the election of those two irritating Muslim women to Congress is just the beginning. There are going to be more and more Muslims elected in coming elections, until they have a majority in both houses. Then they will get a Muslim elected president, and we will be lost. I hope to be long dead by then. But my progeny will still be alive, and they will have to live under the laws they get made, one of which will make ANY criticism of Muslims a crime. They’re already working on that one. One day we will wake up and Sharia Law will be the law of the land and the Constitution will be dead. It will be done by simply sending more and more Muslim extremists to live here while making as much trouble as they can, while waiting until the time when they are in the majority, and we will be a Muslim-run country with non-Muslims being criminalized by the laws they get passed, and which their president signs into law. Nancy Peelosi had fear in her eyes the other day when she had to respond to the antics of the two Muslim extremists now in Congress. She knows what’s coming as they decry people with “dual loyalty,” meaning that they believe Israel has a right to exist. This completely ignores their own “dual loyalty” mandated in the Koran, which says a Muslim “can only be loyal to Allah,” and to no one else. So the oaths they took were lies, which are approved by the Koran if it advances the Muslim ideology. We need to stop electing Muslims to office because of that “loyalty.” Not just because they’re Muslims. But because a Muslim CANNOT be loyal to anything BUT Allah. It’s a basic tenet of their “religion.” Of course, they will label me as “Islamaphobic” for this opinion. (Legal Insurrection)

Obama's Obstruction of Justice

The Dumocrats are working hard to pony-up a case of “obstruction of justice” to lay on President Trump, without any kind pf evidence there WAS any. Meanwhile, they’re IGNORING the blatant, plain-as-the-nose-on-your-face obstruction of justice by the Obama administration when his Department of Justice flatly TOLD the FBI not to charge Hillary Clinton in the e-mail “investigation” they were conducting. They thought they were going to get something to use against President Trump from Lisa Page, Peter Strzok’s bed-partner, but she surprised them. Instead of giving them something to use against TRUMP, she gave them something they could use against OBAMA. His DOJ actually ORDERED them not to prosecute Hillary, so she could get elected president, and advance their plans to make this into a socialist country. But do you think anybody will be prosecuted for this? Doubtful. Dumocrats usually IGNORE such evidence and keep searching for that elusive “evidence” of a crime on the part of President Trump. If it does happen, it will be after intense pressure on the Dumocrats to do SOMETHING. And if they do anything, they will try their best to minimize the effect of it on the Dumocrat Party and especially on Hillary, their heroine. (Legal Insurrection)

Frankly, I Give Up

I’ve been trying to make people see the dangers of collectivism since the sixties, to no avail. The ability of liberals to divert criticism is very effective. Now even a national news show (The Today Show) is celebrating a communist holiday, and I guarantee you that they have no idea of the significance of that. Or if they do it is a demonstration of just how successful the liberals have been in hiding the inequities of communism while pushing it on us under different names. The original “National Women’s Day” was used as a precursor to the takeover in Russia of the communists. And I have no doubt that today’s collectivists hope to do the same in America. Communism is just one of many forms of collectivism, right along with socialism, “democratic socialism,” Fascism, progressivism, and many others. All adhere to the same motto: “FROM each according to his ABILITY and TO each according to his NEED.” Making NEED a DEMAND upon the EARNINGS of others. This appeals to those who want to live at the expense of others without the bother of working to support themselves. And there are way too many of those people today in this country after many years of “conditioning” that “the world owes them a living.” It does not. But when I tell this to others, I either get a blank stare, or active opposition, depending on their IGNORANCE and the brainwashing to which they have been subjected from a very young age. Collectivism is coming to us. It’s only a matter of time. I just hope I am not alive to be forced to live under it. (The American Spectator)

Nobody Gets Punished

Not on the Dumocrat side, anyway. After the “investigations” are over and the crimes described, what happens to the “criminal?” Answer? NOTHING. The Dumocrats just ignore it and go right on doing what they’ve been doing, all along. Fleecing the populace right in front of them. And when they get “caught,” their crimes are covered up, and they escape meaningful punishment. Example: Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton lied to Congress. Yes, he got impeached, for whatever that’s worth, since he didn’t get “convicted” by the Senate. He lost his license to practice law for five years. Big deal. He hasn’t practiced law for more years than that, and with the millions he has conned out of the populace, he has no need to practice law for more than five years. He was fined a huge amount. But who paid it? Not him. His “campaign” paid it, with YOUR money.

He is still regarded as a “standard bearer” in the Dumocrat Party. The liberal media MARVELED at his ability to lie convincingly. They did not condemn him for it. Now let’s talk about Hillary. Bill’s wife. Who violated the law in many ways and was found to have done so. But then the FBI “cleared her” from punishment because “she didn’t mean it.” She and Bill conned multi-millions of dollars out of foreign governments on the promise that when she was president, she would give them “special consideration on all things. Did she give that money back when she was defeated? Not a chance. She just went right on coining the dough based on LATER promises. This is what it means to be a Dumocrat. Protection from meaningful punishment for all your crimes. But if you’re a Republican and get caught with your hand in the cookie jar, it’s “Katy Bar the Door!” There’ll be fourteen different “investigations” with ORDERS to bury you in the deepest, darkest prison anywhere. Guilty or not. (Just common sense)

CNBC Is Deluded

They actually think the NRA will FIRE Dana Loesch to "repair their reputation." What the hell makes them think the NRA NEEDS to "repair their reputation" among anybody except those who believe the propaganda put out by the anti-gun fools? They really think that everybody believes the same bull-dung they believe, and will respond to their ignorant posing. The NRA laughs at their feeble efforts to undermine them, They know that their basis of action is, in fact, supported by the Constitution and that CNBC's is NOT. So why would they even CONSIDER firing one of their most effective spokespeople because CNBC demands it? It's really funny watching the liberals try and influence these people with their phony outrage. They think we really CARE about their outrage. We don't. Because we have no respect for them. They are just another part of the liberal "fake news" industry, and their "influence" over people with INTELLIGENCE is nil. (CNBC)

Taking Down Trump

There is only one reason for anybody to want to “take down President Trump.” It is his promise to “drain the swamp.” And Trump is well known for DOING what he promises to do. Swamp dwellers are sorely afraid. They know their time is coming, and soon. So they want to “head him off at the pass” and get rid of him before he can “take THEM down.” Which is why it seems like every liberal and many non-liberals in DC want to be rid of him. They know that, if they don’t, THEY are going to be ENDED. Which is why there are so many “investigations” of him and everything he has ever done. They’re searching diligently for a crime they can pin on him to get him out of the way before he gets them. Unfortunately for them, none of those “investigations” have uncovered anything resembling a crime they can pin on him. Most of which are being done by Dumocrats. Which have found nothing. They’re getting desperate. So it becomes obvious that searching for swamp dwellers is simple. Look for those who are the most fervent in their opposition to Trump, and that person is absolutely most likely to be a “swamp dweller.” (Just common sense)

No Freedom of Speech

According to this article, a study conducted by the Foundation for Individual rights in Education found that 50% of the students wish to be able to restrict “intolerant opinions,” while at the same time saying “free speech” is the most important civil liberty. It’s obvious that they just don’t have any idea what “free speech” really is. And what will be “intolerant opinions?” Any opinion that doesn’t agree with theirs. And who decides what constitutes “intolerant opinions?” They do, of course. This is NOT “freedom of speech,” but they don’t know it. They think freedom of speech is letting THEM speak their mind, but not allowing people who disagree with them, in any way, to do so. They think this way because that’s what their liberal professors have taught them in their many years of indoctrination. That this indoctrination has “taken well” is illustrated by these opinions. I believe they’re wrong. Anybody should be allowed to speak, even if they don’t agree with them. So my opinion must be an “intolerant opinion” and I should not be allowed to speak my mind. To them, that’s “freedom of speech.” The liberals are winning, folks! (Legal Insurrection)

Won't Protect Our Kids

But raising the age limit to buy certain kinds of guns to 21 WILL violate or constitutional rights. That seems to be the "knee-jerk response" whenever somebody goes into a school and kills a bunch of kids, whether or NOT a gun is involved. I remember when a guy went in with a KNIFE and killed some kids, the anti-gun fools "jumped in" immediately with their demands for new useless anti-gun laws. All this does is prove my contention that, for some reason, they are DETERMINED to eliminate our gun rights, altogether, in spite of the fact that they are GUARANTEED by the Constitution, the BASIS for ALL our laws. I think the reason is simple: the liberals intend to become "all-powerful" in our government, and they want NO armed people in the populace to oppose them when they come to take what is ours. This, of course, doesn't count the "bad guys" (not a part of the government) who don't register their ILLEGALLY-gotten guns, but they don't worry about them. They just shoot them to death if they give them any trouble. (NSSF)

In Search of A Crime

The “swamp dwellers” have stopped even pretending that they’re actually looking for something specific. Now they’re “hunting for a crime” they can pin on President Trump. After the abysmal failure of all their previous efforts to frame President Trump, they’re now giving Trump’s entire life an “anal exam,” looking for ANY kind of a “crime” they can pin on him. They’ve demanded papers from 81 different people Trump may have known for more than a few minutes, and will soon be looking into his kindergarten records if they don’t find something elsewhere first. They have no “probable cause” of anything. They’re on a “fishing expedition” and will twist anything they can into some sort of a “crime.” This is going to continue right up to the time when Trump leaves office, either by losing in 2020 (not likely), or until he must leave office because he may not, by law, succeed himself in that office more than once. To pursue it, they will have spent many millions, maybe even BILLIONS of dollars of taxpayer money in their attempts to “get” Trump before he gets them. They know he’s “coming for them,” and they want to “head him off at the pass” before he can finish “draining the swamp.” (Rush Limbaugh)

"Isn't About the Baby!"

That’s the “war cry” of those who want the unfettered right to murder their offspring after engaging in unprotected sex. They don’t want to take responsibility for raising the result, so they just want to kill it. Now even AFTER the baby has survived the initial effort to kill it (at least, so far, just in New York and Virginia). They keep saying, “It’s not abut the baby! It’s about the woman’s right to choose what happens to her own body!” No, it’s NOT! It IS about the baby because we’re talking about ENDING A LIFE. If it were about a woman’s right to say what happens to her body, prostitution would be legal. But don’t look for that to happen soon. They say you can’t call abortion murder, trying to limit debate, but you CAN! It IS murder. It is ENDING A LIFE! That’s murder, in anybody’s language—unless you’re trying to overturn eons of human law and make murder legal “under certain conditions.” Maybe we should ask them what they would think about themselves being aborted. Maybe that would make them think, maybe not. “Abortion is for other people, not me.” That’s their way of thinking. (Just common sense)

Strengthening the NRA

The anti-gun fools would like to destroy outfits like the NRA, which is the strongest pro-self defense organization out there trying to defend our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to be armed for self defense. They keep saying the NRA is "pro-gun," which is WRONG. The NRA is "pro-self defense," whatever tool you may use to accomplish that, INCLUDING guns. Every time they start blaming them for the mass shootings that occur, their membership goes up, and the dollars they have to promote their position increases, as well. The anti-gun fools hate that, but they don't know how to stop it. So they just keep on doing the same things, over and over, and NRA membership keeps growing, while the dollars in their coffers grows, right along with it. What the anti-gun fools just don't realize is that a MAJORITY of Americans WANT to keep their self defense rights, and be able to buy and use a TOOL to accomplish it, a gun. Since just about ALL the criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists who want to victimize them HAVE guns that will never appear on any "background check," because they never REGISTER their illegally-gotten guns. (Time)

No Hate Speech Laws!

I never thought America would ever even consider making laws against freedom of speech. But now the liberals (Dumocrats) are trying to get laws made against something called “hate speech” so they could punish people for voicing differing opinions. The bad thing about that is that, “hate speech” can be DEFINED by anybody. Dumocrats could declare ANY criticism of their insane ideas as “hate speech.” Muslim extremists have already established any criticism of their killing people all over the world for not believing in their “religion” as “Islamophobia,” which is “hate speech,” according to them. That’s their way of blunting ANY criticism of he actions of Muslim extremists. When a law is made so loosely that anybody can DEFINE it as being such, nobody is safe from being accused (and sometimes convicted in phony courtrooms) of hate speech for DISAGREEING with someone. Liberals already are practicing a form of that, with their “racism” accusations of ANYBODY who disagrees with their positions. A law against hate speech would strengthen their position so they would never have to come up with a logical answer when people question their foolishness. Never mind that freedom of speech means someone can disagree with you, or the government, with impunity, even if you don’t like what they’re saying. That’s what the FIRST Amendment is all about. And that’s why it IS the FIRST Amendment. ANY law against hate speech is unconstitutional on its face because it pretends to punish people for their opinions. (Cato Institute)

Somebody's Gotta Pay!

Dumocrats don’t even consider how we’re going to pay for all the giveaway programs they’re offering. They just say, “The government will pay for it.” Which completely ignores the fact that the government can only pay for ANYTHING after they TAKE money from those who EARN. Kamala Harris, for instance, wants “Medicare for all!” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants it, too, as well as college tuition for all and government-paid health care for all, with insurance coverage eliminated, plus a minimum income for all, whether they work, or not. She wants to “tax the rich” up to 75%, forgetting that when taxes are that high, they find ways around it that they don’t bother with when tax rates are more reasonable. Eventually, all this damnable spending will “come due,” and they won’t be able to pay up. So then they’ll demand even more confiscatory taxation that will bankrupt all those who earn their own way and produce new wealth, so they will stop earning, and join those “riding the wagon” while there will be nobody pushing. Then we will be where Venezuela is, today. When we “run out of other people’s money,” and people RIOT to get such small things like toilet paper. Never mind the food they need to stay alive. (Just common sense)

Didn't Work Before

Won't work this time, either. I'm talking about that infamous "assault weapons ban" that was in force for a while, that didn't stop a single "assault weapon" (whatever THAT is) from being sold on the black market. And to risk repeating myself, I'll say, "It won't do it this time, either." And bump stocks: banning them will spark a new industry making them FOR the black market, and their numbers will INCREASE, rather than decrease. They're too easy to make. That's how it is. You can't ban human nature. Criminals, and others who want to shoot people will find a way. They always have, and always will. Like "the poor," such people will always be with us, whether we like it, or not. Some ass will probably "take me to task" for mentioning "the poor" always being with us, but I don't care. I figure if some blockhead doesn't give me a hard time, I'm not doing my job. In any case, they're now saying that, to say "criminals don't obey laws" is "hate speech," which loudly announces their stupidity. So why should I care? To quote the "Prickly City" comic strip (something I don't often do), "I like it when stupid people express themselves, It helps me identify them," (LA Times)

Walking Out Is A Tactic

Dumocrats—and even some Republicans, are criticizing President Trump for “walking out” of the meeting with Kim Il Stupid, never realizing that this master negotiator is merely utilizing a basic tactic in negotiations, that of “walking out” so his opponent must do something different in order to continue the negotiations. The very first book I wrote, “The Horse Trader’s Bible” (never published, because of a dispute with the publisher), sub-titled, “How to Beat the Car Dealer At His Own Game,” emphasized that point. At some point, Kim will “come around” to Trump’s way of thinking as a way to stay alive and in power without “losing face.” They just will not admit that Trump is a master negotiator and does not operate the same as most politicians. President Reagan was also a master negotiator, and when he “walked out” of negotiations in Reykjavik with Russia, he won the “cold war,” bringing down the “Iron Curtain.” The very fact both presidents have won big victories (or soon will) with this tactic falls on deaf ears in “the swamp,” and they try to use them as criticism they hope will END that president. And they’re wrong, every time. (Legal Insurrection)

Hates Being Fact-Checked

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is mad. Mad because her statements have been “fact-checked.” There’s a good reason for that. Almost every word she utters reveals her abysmal IGNORANCE about the most BASIC of things. Things a Member of Congress should know, but she does NOT. She is a member of one of THREE equal parts of the government, but she doesn’t know that. She thinks there are only TWO. One of her most recent “fact-challenged” statements is the one in which she claimed that “a majority of Americans don’t make a living wage,” which isn’t supported by the raw numbers. She whined about outfits like WalMart and Amazon paying their employees minimum wages. But those companies pay well above minimum wage. Not an unusual opinion for one who thinks her “princely salary” as a government employee isn’t enough to pay the bills. Those must be some bills she runs up! She said the “fact-checker relied on a WalMart-funded report” for his findings. He did not, He relied on an OBAMA-appointed Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. More Pinocchios for her. Many people think this broad is just stupid. And every time she opens her blow-hole, she confirms it. A typical Dumocrat. But more obvious. (Life Zette)

It's Not About Guns!

It's about human rights. President Trump appears to have "bought" at least one of the fairy tales they spread, like butter, everywhere they go. The ant-gun fools present their argument as "controlling access to guns," but it is really to DENY us our constitutionally guaranteed RIGHT to be armed for self defense. The laws and regulations they promote do NOT "limit access to guns" for anybody but the law-abiding. They do obey these laws, even though they don't like them, while the people who ARE the problem predictably IGNORE them, and get their guns in a back alley somewhere, out of the car trunk belonging to another criminal. Meanwhile, gun violence continues unabated, even INCREASES. One example is Chicago, where the gun laws are very tight, while gun violence is very high, as well. Highest in the nation. How do these people get their guns? ILLEGALLY, of course, that's how. Somebody needs to come up with a REAL solution, and get it past those anti-gun fools, who simply want to do away with our right to be armed, in SPITE of the constitutional guarantee of that right. They don't care if we die, as long as they get their way. (MSN)

Hillary Ain't Runnin'

Yeah, right! Like most politicians, she says she “isn’t running” until the day she announces her candidacy and scares everybody (except Dumocrats, of course) to death. You’d think this bimbo would finally get it: we don’t want her anywhere near the White House, even as a visitor. She might take some more of the silverware, and WILL bring us socialism. Former Colorado Governor Hickenpoo—er, looper says “this is a divided nation, and that’s a crisis!” Funny. Isn’t that the way the Founders PLANNED it? This nation has ALWAYS been “divided.” A non-divided nation is a dictatorship, run by the strongest one among us. The strongest, not the best for us. They planned it to keep the ONE strongest than the rest from becoming a dictator. The country being divided is NOT a “crisis,” no matter how much Hick wants it to be. Even in Russia, where one party rules, there IS “a division.” Of course, they know how to handle “a division,” just KILL the opposition if you’re the ONE in power. Same with Kim Jong Stupid. He was worried about his uncle “taking him down,” so he had him killed. Hillary isn’t a “strong man (woman)” but still there is already a long list of those who were scheduled to testify against her or Bill who have died under very suspicious circumstances—like a “suicide” by shooting himself in the head—TWICE. (6 ABC)

Mueller Has Failed

And failed BIG. He was hired for one purpose. To find something, ANYTHING actionable on President trump, so the Dumocrats can reverse the results of the 2016 election. After two years of searching under every rock and crack, he has found NOTHING but a few “process crimes” by some people Trump once knew. In the process, he has ruined many people, financially and otherwise, and scammed a couple of people into “testifying” to a few things that have nothing to do with President Trump. The latest target is a billionaire who once “advised” Trump during his successful campaign. Mueller’s very APPOINTMENT was illegal. In order for a “special counsel” to even be appointed, the law states that there must be a CRIME to be “investigated.” “Colluding with the Russians” is NOT a crime. The indictments he has obtained are infinitesimal and mean NOTHING to the actual “investigation,” which was a “witch hunt,” from the beginning, based only on the fertile IMAGINATION of many Dumocrats, none of whom are really very smart, though they think they’re the “smartest people in the room. Of course we know, that’s a sure symptom of ignorance. (LifeZette)

"Petrified of the NRA"

Apparently, President Trump is buying some of the anti-gun fool myths. One of them is that lawmakers are "petrified" of the NRA. Nothing could be further from the truth. Some lawmakers simply see the LOGIC in the position of the NRA, and make laws to reflect that, while refusing to make more of the INEFFECTIVE, USELESS laws they want them to make. That's not petrification, it's good sense. The NRA simply stands up for our CONSTITUTIONAL right to be armed for self defense, and Trump needs to be aware of that. The whole idea that lawmakers are "petrified" of the NRA is a liberal fairy tale, and apparently they have convinced Trump of that. "Take the guns first?" It might sound good to some, but it scares me. If you can break the law first, and THEN "go through the motions" in court later, begs the question" "How many other rights will you take away" in the future, when you can pony up an excuse? Trump IS doing something right when he says we need to ALLOW teachers and other staff who HAVE a "concealed carry permit" and the proper training to bring their guns to school. None of them who don't want to do that, need to do so. Nobody should ever be FORCED to do so. But the very presence of a FEW armed staff would be a DETERRENT to potential mass killers. That has been proved in Israel, where they do arm their teachers. (Just common sense)

Showing Her Ignorance (Again)

Hillary Clinton (former First Lady to a failed president and herself a failed presidential candidate) is now saying “the country is now in a full-fledged crisis.” Really, Hil? Is it a crisis that we now have FULL EMPLOYMENT? That so many people are working (those who want to work, anyway) that employers are now having trouble filling all the jobs, including the most menial, needing the least amount of training? Is it a “crisis” that the unemployment figures are at RECORD LOWS? That the world now respects us, while they began to lose that respect when your husband was president, and moreso under Obama? That people are now mostly being paid more for the work they do, and new business startups are also up? Is is a “crisis” that EVERY INDICATOR is up? That we are unmistakably (except to Dumocrats) in a BOOM ECONOMY? That the only racism that is growing is that against WHITE PEOPLE? Feuled by liberals? Frankly, I wouldn’t want to live in a world in your version of a “good economy,” where millions are unemployed and your president is telling you that is “the new normal” and you should never expect “the good times” to return, as Obama told us. THIS is your reason to want to be president? Sorry lady, I don’t want it. Not now, not later, not EVER. So go away! And take the rest of your Dumocrat wishfuls with you into oblivion. (Just common sense)

"To Get things Done"

Former Colorado Governor Hicknpooper—er, uh, Looper, says he saw “a wish for somebody like him as president everywhere I went.” He must have been looking in a mirror a lot. He also said people want not only “somebody who can beat Trump, but who can get things done.” What the hell does this fool think Trump has been doing for the last two years? Obama told us his miserable economy was “the new normal.” That “prosperity was a thing of the past, and would not return.” So Trump “took his magic wand” and BROUGHT it back. We are now in a “boom economy.” Unemployment is at record lows, while millions of jobs Obama said were “never coming back,” --came back. Obama also said those manufacturers who left America would not come back, either—but many of them ARE. And there are dozens of other demonstrations that we HAVE someone in office who can “get things done,” and we don’t need Hickenp—looper to mess things up as Dumocrats always do.

I lived in Colorado while he was governor, and I know how incompetent he was. I had to shake my head often as he ran rampant making new tax laws. He makes good beer—if you like that sort of thing—but he was NOT a good governor, and would NOT make a good president. Maybe he wouldn’t be as bad as Obama (Obama set a new standard for incompetence—if he didn’t do all those stupid things on purpose), but, as president, he would be a disaster. He cites a “Crisis of Division,” never mentioning it has been CREATED and maintained by the Dumocrats, and exists ONLY among Dumocrats. Trump maintains high approval ratings. The liberal New York Times says when he left office, Colorado had one of the best economies in the nation, based on nothing except their imagination. They cite a few of his “accomplishments,” and they are all Dumocrat (liberal) pipe-dreams. No figures are offered. (New York Times)

Flailing Around, Searching

The Dumocrats are sorely stressed. Nothing they’ve done has worked. They have “shot their wad,” hoping to find something, ANYTHING they could use to derail President Trump before he ruins all their nefarious plans to “rule the world” from the swamp. Their “big thing,” the “Russian collusion” thing, fell flat, and they can’t figure out why (maybe because it’s only in their imagination?), so now they’re going to give his entire life, from birth, an anal examination. They’ve already spent more than $20 million dollars in taxpayer money, and found nothing. So now they’re going to spend more millions hunting for anything they can find, for not only the next two years, but the four years following. I wonder how much of those millions will find itself in their pockets? But that’s another story, to be examined later. As long as the money holds out, they will continue to look for something they can use to “get rid of Trump.” They are convinced that the “country” wants them to succeed, but, as usual, they’re wrong. Dumocrats only talk to other Dumocrats, so their knowledge is skewed. They think the rest of America thinks the same way they do, and, as usual, they’re WRONG. Somebody needs to say, “enough!” and cut off their “unlimited funds.” Then they’d have to face reality, that Trump is going to win. He already HAS won. (Just common sense)

"Don't Violate Sharia Law!"

That’s what Twitter is telling people today, as if that made them criminals. They even warned conservative columnist Michelle Malkin that she “might want to seek legal counsel” if she kept criticizing Pakistan’s Sharia Law. Like that’s something that can be a crime under OUR laws. My advice to Twitter is, “bite me.” and I suspect Malkin has similar advice for them. I don’t know what it is that causes liberals to promote Muslims’ idiocies on Americans. Are they stupid, or what? Sharia Law cannot be more OPPOSED to the tenets of our Constitution, and unless a liberal judge rules AGAINST the Constitution—our BASIS for ALL our laws, Malkin doesn’t have any need to “seek legal counsel” if Twitter disapproves of the things she says on their platform. Truth is, Twitter needs people like Malkin a lot more than she needs them. She has a lot more platforms to get her ideas out than they can give her. I advise her to tell Twitter THEY need to seek legal counsel if they ban her for her words. They have the right to commit long-term suicide if they want, but not to inflict it on others. And pushing Sharia Law on us is just that: political suicide. Anybody who tries to push Sharia Law on me gets a slap in the mouth, and whatever else is needed. (Liberty Bugle)

Revealing their Socialism

Socialists reveal themselves in the things they promote. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for instance, reveals her socialism every time she opens her blow-hole. Her more recent revelation was her idea to “tax the rich” up to 70% of their earnings. Then Pocahontas, Elizabeth Warren, went her one further, and is asking for a “rich people tax” up to 95%. NYC Mayor DiBlasio thinks the wealth “is in the wrong hands.” People who EARNED it. That the Dumocrat Party is solidly socialist is beyond question. Everything they promote has its basis in socialism. Taxes paying for college education; a minimum income for ALL, whether or not they work. Paying for MY college wasn’t even a question demanding an answer. It just wasn’t even considered. And paying me not to work? It wasn’t even suggested then. People in the United States were more intelligent, then. Paying people when they don’t work guarantees most of them will NOT work. So where will the socialist thieves get the money they need to LOOT to pay for all these things? There is a saying: “Socialism works until you run out of other people’s money.” And that is a truism. Socialism is BASED on the THEFT of the fruits of the ideas and labors of those willing and able to EARN for themselves, and socialism itself destroys this source by making sure that, in time, the “producers” of society will figure out they will be looted by the government, so they will stop producing—and the whole thing will go “down the tubes,” as expected, by those of us with any degree of intelligence. Socialism is failing spectacularly right now in Venezuela, but the socialist apologists are still trying to sell it. (Legal Insurrection)

Truth About Gun Control

The bad guys don't care a whit about your gun laws. They're in the business of disobeying laws, so why should they give a damn about those laws? In fact, they LIKE your gun laws because they know that all they do is make it easier for them to victimize the law-abiding, without much fear of their potential victims being armed. They know that the law-abiding OBEY those laws, making them "easy targets." The way to self defense is NOT to disarm yourself. But anti-gun fools refuse to accept that. I'm sure they're aware that none of their "gun control laws" work worth a damn. But they continue to make them, anyway. Either they're stupid, or their goal is to make it easier for the bad guys to victimize us with mostly impunity. Or maybe they just want to disarm the law-abiding for their own purposes. Nazi Germany was "disarmed," and it cost 6 million Jews their lives. The old Soviet Union was "gun-free," at least, as far as the private citizens were concerned, and Stalin murdered millions of his citizens with impunity. Other dictators similarly disarmed their people, and predictably murdered many of them. Probably the only thing that has allowed this country to remain relatively free is our constitutional right to be armed for self defense. Liberals work HARD, every day, to take away that constitutional right, saying it's "for our safety." It is NOT. It's for THEIR safety when they come to take what is ours. (Just common sense)