Rising Gun Sales

We've had skyrocketing gun sales in recent years, mostly fueled by fears that liberals will enact more and tighter gun laws. But the gun sales that we should be worrying about are NOT those LEGAL gun sales. It is the ILLEGAL gun sales that take place in the back alleys of cities we need to worry about, because it is potential CRIMINALS buying them. And STEALING them. This rise is mostly fueled by the hundreds and hundreds of criminals Barack Obama has released from prison on various pretexts, plus the Islamic terrorists he has also released. Obama put THOUSANDS of illegal gun-wielders on the streets, many of them doing violent crimes to get money to buy dope. He CLAIMED that he was only releasing drug violators, but those drug violators commit crimes to feed their habits. Additionally, the Islamic terrorists he released go back to their terrorism in foreign countries, while many of them come right back here to do violence "in the name of Islam."

Obama seemed dedicated to INCREASING violent crime in this country. He will deny it, to his dying day. But it is true. There can be no other reason for releasing so MANY violent criminals of both kinds, all the time CLAIMING to be trying to REDUCE crime. Obama saw to the release of more criminals on the public than ANY previous president. He said he was "being compassionate" to those criminals--but what about "being compassionate" to their victims? As ILLEGAL gun sales rise, the anti-gun fools will not make a lot of noise about it, because there's really no way to chart those sales, so nobody will notice them--until more criminals victimize more citizens. Legal gun sales may mitigate that, to some degree, by "leveling the playing field" for those who have them. But the anti-gun fools spend every waking hour (and some even DREAM about it) trying to find ways to take away the right to self defense and to buy and use the means to that end, a gun.

Trump can't do much about those releases, because of the way the law is written, So you can look for crime rates to skyrocket, too--and it will be dutifully blamed on Trump, although it will be a result of OBAMA'S foolishness. But hopefully there will not be any more mass releases of criminals under Trump, and hopefully, the cops will keep an eye on those criminals he released, and put them back in prison where they belong when they commit new crimes, as they will--hopefully before they kill anybody--but I'm afraid that's a forlorn hope. Somebody needs to keep track of the number of those felons Obama released who commit new crimes--but I doubt anybody will--unless Trump sees to it. In any case, there is going to be a big increase in gun violence, fueled by Obama's actions. One can only hope those LEGAL guns can get rid of some of the ILLEGAL gun wielders so as to then REDUCE gun violence. (Yahoo)

Racism Against Whites

I guess that's okay, at least with Netflix. They have a new movie coming out. The title is, "Dear White People" and is a racist movie. Racist against white people, not backs. What if someone came out with a movie titled, "Dear Black People?" Liberals would lose their MINDS! And they'd be right. So why do they yawn when told about this movie? Racism against whites is "the new racism," and has the tacit APPROVAL of liberals. I've seen more angry black people recently than at any time in the past, and they accuse white people of racism, while demonstrating their OWN racism. White racism against blacks is at its lowest ebb ever, in this country.

There are more BLACK mayors and other politicians in the South today than EVER. We have even had our first black PRESIDENT! How would that even be POSSIBLE if this country were so racist? In the 50s, that would be unheard of. I remember being asked by a COP in the fifties which side I'd be on when the race war began. And he was a good friend of mine, and a decent fellow, as a rule. He didn't SEEM to be racist, except for that. Black against white racism has become "normal" in this country, today, and if we allow it to continue, we will LOSE our country. (Glenn Beck)

Now It's Trump's Pen

Obama famously (or infamously, depending on your outlook) said, "I have a pen, and I have a phone," and he used them to circumvent the Constitution of the United States in many ways, on many occasions, legal and illegal. One of the most sinister ways was to "gnaw away" at the constitutionally guaranteed right to be armed in self defense. Often by making the guns we DO have useless, and impossible to get into action fast enough when threatened by an ILLEGAL gun owner (criminal). Such things as gun locks, gun safes, and even some laws that allow guns to be carried, but require the guns to be UNLOADED. Other laws are made, making it illegal to bring guns into certain "gun-free zones," laws that are regularly disobeyed by criminals, not licensed gun carriers. Everything he did was designed to make it easier for ILLEGALLY armed criminals to victimize honest, law-abiding people. Now Trump has the pen, and the phone, and he has already started reversing Obama's ignorant executive orders on many things, INCLUDING gun control. More to come. (Ammoland)

Stupidity Reigns Supreme

They held a "campus carry task force" at Lone Star College in Houston, TX, and what did they recommend? That tired, old, mass shooter-drawing "gun-free zone" stupidity that has never worked to reduce or eliminate gun crime, instead, giving would-be shooters a "safe place" to go in and kill people. That's because people who obey the rules probably won't be armed and able to kill him before he can kill as many people as he would like. It has become OBVIOUS that gun free zones are stupid, but apparently the members of this "task force" aren't intelligent enough to perceive that. Maybe after a mass shooter comes into THEIR gun free zone and kills a few students and teachers, they'll wise up. Naaahhh....they won't. Anti-gun fools never do. So I guess the way to solve this problem is to get rid of the people who populate such "task forces." (Ammoland)

Getting Tough With Rioters

In at least one place, they are getting tough with Hillary's paid rioters who purposely damaged property and hurt people in their rampages, that were paid for by Hillary and the Democrat Party, most likely with money provided by that economic saboteur, George Soros. Some (almost all) have been indicted for FELONIES that can carry TEN YEARS in prison and a $25,000.00 fine. I bet they didn't plan on that When the Democrats hired them. They thought they would be just "taken away" and, once they got to a private area, given a "ticket," and released, as they did under Obama, to have their cases thrown out of court later, when nobody's looking. Now some of them are "going away" for a long time. This should be done everywhere Hillary's goons riot, which will undoubtedly END the practice. These people are CRIMINALS, and should be treated as such. (Just common sense)

Damned Fool Liberals

I'm getting really tired of their yammering. They're crying, screaming, lying on the floor kicking their feet over Trump whipping their butts in the election. They thought he couldn't possibly win that election, but he did, resoundingly They take comfort in him not winning the popular vote, but that's not how we elect presidents in this country. We have elected them through the electoral college since the very first, and they know that. But they just won't admit it, and I'm sick of their childish behavior. They're protesting the LEGAL way in which he won, like his winning was illegal. He has pledged to penalize those "sanctuary" cities for refusing to obey the law.

They have pledged to fight back, It isn't often a CRIMINAL pledges to fight the cops, and the mayors of these cities ARE criminals. You don't get to decide WHICH laws you will obey and not be punished. Their criminality is going to cost their cities millions of dollars, maybe BILLIONS. Which will cause suffering for many of their righteous citizens, to the benefit of interlopers--the illegal kind. Liberals seem always to choose the position that is at odds with normality, and try to MAKE their position "the norm." They'll find they cannot do that with Trump in the White House. And they'd better get used to it. They're making fools of themselves. But that's what they do best, other than stealing elections. (Just common sense)

Prosecute Constitution Abuse

Trump was elected president largely on the votes of those who wanted to retain their right to be armed in self defense. He promised to support the Second Amendment, and he could do that by instructing his new Attorney General to take legal action against states that pass laws and make regulations that infringe on people's rights under the Second Amendment. DOJ has prosecuted states in other cases involving violations of the constitution, and this would be right and proper. Washington, DC and Chicago, for instance, have made several laws that have been DECLARED unconstitutional, So they remake the law in almost identical fashion, and pass it, enforcing it until the next time it is declared unconstitutional, fining people big money, end even imprisoning some. This should cause those politicians involved to be subject to lawful indictment and prosecution. This can be done, and it would reassure potential gun owners that he meant what he said. (Second Amendment Foundation)

Uncontrolled Liberal Hacks

But they're wearing black robes and have lifetime appointments, so, under current law, they get to rule whichever way they want, not bothering to base their rulings on the law, or the Constitution, as they are DIRECTED to do. They get away with it, because nobody had the forethought to put "checks and balances" on them. There is NOBODY who can review their rulings and MAKE them cite the statute OR the constitutional provision upon which they base their rulings. One such judge, in the past, based his ruling on FOREIGN LAW, something which should have NO AFFECT on a ruling in a U. S. Court. That was a clear violation of his oath of office. Now a hack in a Washington federal court made a ruling, not on the law, but on his own bias that has put America's safety in doubt, and the hacks in the "Ninth Circus" Court backed him up, again without reference to the law or the Constitution.

There needs to be an "Inspector General" to oversee the courts, making sure their rulings conform to the Constitution and the statutes. They should not be allowed to "run wild" with their rulings, and even rule in OPPOSITION to the law or Constitution. In this recent case, the statutes are CLEAR. The president clearly has the statutory authority to limit who is allowed to enter this country if he feels they might be a danger, without interference by a hack on the court. That was ignored by both courts in their "rulings." Laws should be made to FORCE judges to cite the LAW or the CONSTITUTIONAL backing for their rulings, with an inspector general to keep track of it, who has the power to reverse their rulings if they don't, and to REMOVE them if they show a pattern of such rulings. And that should include the supreme Court, itself. They should not be allowed to be a law unto themselves with NO oversight. (Just common sense)

They Protest Too Much

I think the liberals (Democrats) "protest too much." Would there have been violent protests and riots in the streets if Hillary had won? Probably not. The "average American citizen doesn't react that way when their side loses. Besides, more of them have jobs and don't have the time. They just "button up" and take it, waiting for the next opportunity to change things. They realize that sometimes they win, and sometimes they lose. That's the difference between Democrats and other people. Democrats think they have the "divine right to rule," and ANYBODY who pushes them out of the positions of power had to have done it illegally. So they PAY people to demonstrate.They spend $BILLIONS to do it.

They get help from troublemakers like billionaire George Soros, who LOVES to cause trouble for others. He makes millions when it happens. The Democrats are particularly incensed this time, since they not only lost the presidency, they lost both houses in Congress, many governorships, and hundreds, maybe even thousands of legislative seats, all over the country. They have been relegated to (permanent?) "back bench status," and they HATE it. They don't think it's right, and they react violently. They're now a small "coastal party," and they know it, whether or not they admit it. They won't regain their status by what they're doing, but they're like a small child having a temper tantrum. Hopefully, like most tantrums, that will pass. But will it soon enough for them? (Just common sense)

It's Not About Religion!

Liberals like to scream that Trump wants to stop Muslims from entering the United States--period. That's a typical liberal twisting of everything he says, or does. It's not about religion, it's about a large group of Muslims threatening to kill Americans who won't "convert" to their phony "religion," and who are coming here by the thousands, claiming to be "refugees," but who are not. These "refugees" are mostly young, fighting age MEN, with very few women, children or old people. That's NOT using RELIGION as a ban. That's banning people who threaten us from infiltrating us and setting out to kill us. All Muslims are not terrorists. But ALMOST all terrorists today, are Muslims.

Making large groups of Muslims coming here in droves very suspicious. Additionally, even "peaceful Muslims" (so far) are a problem in America, because they insist on interfering in our business by filing suits to keep us from doing what is normal and natural for us, but not for them. You don't come to someone else's house, then demand they conform to YOUR rules. They keep trying to institute "Sharia Law" here. A system that goes against EVERYTHING American. They want to force OUR women to wear hijabs because women without them offends them. That's what they do, and Muslims all over are making trouble, which makes them undesirables. (The Guardian)

Showing Their Butts (Literally)

Democrats, apparently, aren't above showing their butts (literally) to oppose Trump. They are now planning a mass "mooning" in front of Trump Tower--as if that would change anything Trump does. He just laughs at their silly antics, as does the rest of the adult world. Democrats are becoming more and more hysterical as Trump goes about destroying many things they thought were sacrosanct, but were only sacrosanct to them. They pay good money for their thugs to go out and incite riots where people get hurt, property gets damaged, and nothing happens that they would like. Trump just goes right on destroying things liberals love most, but which the rest of the world hates. Maybe soon, they'll figure out that their antics aren't doing anything except making fools of them. But I'm not holding my breath. They're not that intelligent. And I don't like turning blue. (Just common sense)

"Ready, FIRE! ...Er, Aim!

That seems to be what at least one court in Pennsylvania is doing: firing before aiming. They used a "civil forfeiture act" to confiscate the gun used by a man to discourage another driver from tailgating him. The man did nothing but SHOW the gun to the tailgater. He pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct, and the judge refused to give his gun back, citing the "civil forfeiture act." I'm surprised they didn't keep his car, too. Only one problem. That is based on English "common law," that doesn't apply to anything in Pennsylvania, or the United states. In other words, the law the judge cited does not exist. This is a good example of a liberal judge making his own laws. Pennsylvania is largely a liberal-run state, and most of their judges are liberal, and thus are anti-gun fools, which is a basic thing in liberal land. (Philly Voice)

Crook Got A Surprise

He thought this 78-year-old man who came out every day to pick up his paper was going to be "easy pickings." He jumped out of his pickup and put a gun to the man's head and demanded his money. But while pulling out his wallet and giving it to him, he brought out his gun, which he was also in the habit of carrying when he picked up his paper, and blew him away. He jumped in his pickup and ran, but the cops later found him dead, and the man will get his wallet back. That's a result we need to see more of; a robbery victim blowing his robber away. That will ultimately reduce gun violence, as it cuts down on the number of criminals willing to take a chance on getting blown away by his intended victim, or just by reducing the number of live criminals, period. No charges are planned, although the Grand Jury will take a look at the killing, if any prosecutor is dumb enough to bring charges. (The Blaze)

Crybaby Democrats

They criticized Donald Trump when he hedged about accepting the results of the election--until they lost. Now they're going about whining and griping, screaming and kicking the floor from a supine position, and acting like BABIES because THEY can't accept the results of the election. They're hiring goons to start riots and incite Democrat dupes to help them. Those goons are burning things, damaging cars and other private property, and generally making asses of themselves, "protesting" the fact that Donald Trump won the election, fair and square, in spite of all their efforts at election fraud. They're putting as many roadblocks as they can in front of Trump, even if they cause Americans to be KILLED by allowing Muslim terrorists into the country without adequate vetting. The Republicans are getting tired of it, as witness their use of what liberals called an "arcane rule" almost NEVER used to tell Democrat Elizabeth Warren to "siddown and shut up!" She was violating Senate Rule 19 against impugning a fellow Member, something of which I'm sure she was aware--but she didn't care. If the Democrats don't "siddown and shut up" soon, they're going to cement their position as a "regional party" and not fit to field a presidential candidate in the future. (Just common sense)

Cops Support Gun Rights

A recent Pew Poll found that urban police officers favor the right of law-abiding citizens to carry guns for self protection, AND to help the cops in their jobs. Cops in smaller towns (about 17% of cops) were not included in the poll, so nobody knows how they feel on the issue. What the anti-gun fools do is talk to the police politicians to get the answers they want. They never talk to the rank and file, who might feel differently, since they are "in the trenches" and realize that there are ALREADY millions of guns on the streets, ILLEGALLY, and they can't be everywhere at once. Therefore, people should be equipped and ready to defend themselves until the cops can get there. The rank and file know the reality of the situation far more than the police politicians do, since they live in it, every day, while the police politicians live in their "ivory towers." Some of them USED to be "rank and file," but have forgotten the reality. (Bullets First)

"Crafty If Not Wise"

I have to say that "MOMS Against Guns" (or some such) are a crafty bunch. They think of all kinds of things to get noticed. That's necessary, when you have no real message, which they don't. They want one thing: to violate the Constitution of the United States of America, which states categorically that "the right of Americans to be armed shall not be abridged." And everything they try is an ABRIDGMENT of those rights. They have ONE GOAL in mind to destroy the Second Amendment to the Constitution. It's that simple. Many of their ideas are even unsavory--like their planned "pussy hats march," hoping to disrupt Trump's first days in office. But I believe he will ignore them, as all intelligent people do, no matter how "down and dirty" they get. Hmmmm....I wonder who put up the money for those 80 buses. Could it be George Soros? Or the Democrat Party? Or both? (The Hour)

They Don't Need Guns

As I've always said, those fools who want to kill a bunch of people don't need guns. If guns are unavailable to them, they will find a way. As this fool did in Australia, where guns are all but banned, entirely. He was involved in a stabbing, and then drove through a bunch of pedestrians, killing a few, and injuring many. One of his victims was a CHILD, killed in his wild melee. People say guns are at fault, but they aren't. They're just a TOOL "bad guys" use to kill people, and if they aren't available to them, they use knives, cars, trucks, and other instruments of death. Lack of guns does not bother them. Should we ban knives, cars, and trucks, since they have been used to kill people? That would be as stupid as banning guns, because THEY kill people. Without a "bad guy" holding it, a gun is no danger to anybody, nor is a car or a truck. (The Guardian)

"Senseless Death"

That's how the police chief in Decatur, GA (I assume, since they didn't say so in the news item). describes the death of a man who was killed by his wife as he attacked her in her home. I guess it's a good thing he doesn't get to define this death legally, or he'd put her away for a long stretch for defending herself against an out-of-control husband. To some anti gun fools, I guess, ANY use of a gun in self defense is a "senseless death." And it was. But not for her, for him. He didn't need to attack her, and she defended herself and her children. It was "senseless" for HIM to force her into this action, which caused her to kill the father of those children, which they will always remember. If the law barred her from owning a gun, the "senseless death" might have been hers. Which again proves my point that the best defense against an attacker is a gun in your hand. (WALB 10 News)

Democrats: "Useful Idiots"

One of the factors most in use by those who just want to take power over the rest of us is the "useful idiot." The Democrats have that in George Soros and his PAID rioters. One of the tactics used to great advantage by the Nazis (as well as other people who want to RULE us) is the "useful idiot." People willing to riot only, break ANY law, but also cause much property damage and even MURDER to oppose the will of the rightful leaders. That's what we are seeing in our streets today; people who purposely break expensive windows and burn buildings, burn limousines owned by individuals (not the government), hit dissenters in the head with iron bars and otherwise beat up those who oppose them, and disrupt the normal workings of America. And they Also do these things to stifle speakers who they don't agree with, as they did recently, in Berkeley, California, where many liberal terrorists live. These people are home-grown TERRORISTS. This is what terrorists DO! (iPatriot)

"Trump Can Do No Right"

Donald Trump decided to stay at his own hotel in DC while he got inaugurated as the 45th president (He did make it to the bible; a surprising thing with so many liberals promising to assassinate him before he can be sworn in). That move saved the government even more money, as who would charge money for the use of his OWN property? But that isn't how the liberals saw it. They saw it as a conflict of interest, and "free advertising" for his hotel. Apparently, Trump can do no right, according to them. They will find a way to criticize his every move in their attempts to delegitimize him. Talk about "transparent stupidity!" They even lost their minds over the Trump employees giving him a "standing O" as he entered one of his properties recently. I guess they thought his employees should sneer at him and turn their backs on him. The stupid liberals who have boycotted his inauguration think their action will make a difference to anybody but other liberals. They need to "get over themselves." (Just common sense).

"Dangerous and Silly"

The LA Times thinks allowing people who have concealed carry permits to carry their guns on campus is "dangerous and silly." Of course, this completely ignores the fact that there are ALREADY many ILLEGAL guns on campus, and, so far, that has not proven to be overly "dangerous OR silly." Additionally, they think anybody with a college degree should be "stripped of their gun rights." Of course, ALL anti-gun fools, which they seem to be, think EVERYBODY should be stripped of their gun rights--except for them. Many of them ARE armed, and think that's only their right--but that right is not for you. They say that law-abiding people RARELY use a gun for self defense (which is a LIE), so the whole idea is pointless. Whatta bunch of BOOBS! They think a "good guy with a gun" is INEFFECTIVE against a criminal with a gun, which is just STUPID! Criminals with guns have been stopped OFTEN by a "good guy with a gun," but they want to ignore that to preserve their phony narrative. (Breitbart)

Social Security: Big Mistake

Democrats will dispute this (of course), but I say that Social Security was one of the biggest mistakes we ever made. Because it TRUSTS the government to put the money they extort from us "in a lockbox" to give back to us later on in our lives. That did NOT happen. They STOLE the money and put it in the general fund, to spend on their myriad "giveaway programs" and other government programs, leaving the benefits rightfully OWED to the elderly to be paid out of that general fund, instead of from an inviolate fund SET UP for that purpose, as promised. Now they're running out of money and are scrambling for a way to keep the money flowing--SOME of the money. Now they want to apply "means testing" for recipients, as if it were a WELFARE program. It is NOT. It is the RETURN of SOME of the money they extorted from us, so they could use it for years, WITHOUT paying us interest for its use. So some millionaires get it--so what? They paid in, too. they're entitled to get paid, now, just as people with less money of their own are entitled.

It's THEIR money. The government does NOT own it. Another way they want to put in to help keep up the ILLUSION that it is welfare, is to reduce the benefits, therefore making it more difficult for elders to "make ends meet," all to support their CON. We let them do it (our fathers, anyway), because it sounded good, like with all other cons, but the "difference is in the details," which they kept from us. The details being that they didn't make a LAW to keep the money inviolate, or to pay us interest for the USE of our money for so many years. Now the bill is coming due and they can't pay it. As with all pyramid schemes, it is close to collapsing, so they're scrambling to hide the fact that it is NOT welfare, and we ARE "entitled" to the money, without a REDUCTION in benefits, OR a "means test. Social Security is a big "Ponzi Scheme" (Pyramid Scheme) run by the government. Something they put people in PRISON for. If you don't believe that, look at both, side by side. There are better, more honest plans to take care of living expenses for elders. But this is the one they chose to impose on us. (Just common sense)

Gabby's Gittin' Frustrated

She has started screaming at her crowds. She's frustrated by the failure of most of her efforts to undermine the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and take away our constitutionally guaranteed right to be armed in self-defense. She's been working HARD, ever since she was shot in the head and had her brains scrambled, and most of what she promotes has failed. She must still be giddy from that, seeing how all her efforts are based on the idea that LEGAL gun owners are responsible for the "gun crime" she thinks is "out of control," but is NOT. She just can't understand that the laws she promotes do NOTHING to "reduce gun crime," but, instead, INCREASE it by disarming honest, law-abiding people, leaving them defenseless against the kind of people like the guy who almost killed her. One day, maybe she'll wake up out of the fog she's in now, and realize what she's doing is against the law, and will do just the opposite of what she plans. (Breitbart)

Are These People Demented?

How many times do we need to tell the anti-gun fools that "gun-free zones" not only DON'T WORK, but are a "magnet" for those who want to shoot a place up and kill people? How many times must that be PROVED by many people DYING before they understand? It is said that, doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is INSANITY! If you looked in a dictionary for "insanity," you'll find Gabby Gifford's or Mike Bloomberg's picture next to it. What part of "doesn't work" do they not understand? Criminals, who break laws for a LIVING, don't OBEY the many inane laws they cause to be made by gullible politicians. Yet they continue to make them. They call their laws, "common sense laws." But they are ANYTHING but common sense. They're STUPID! (Truth About Guns)

Ending Free Speech

Liberals rioted to gain "free speech" in the sixties and are now rioting to END free speech in America. This, they did in Berkeley, California the other day. They threw fire bombs, beat people up, and generally became (again) CRIMINALS to keep a man who disagreed with their stupid ideas from speaking on the Berkeley campus. The "authorities" there sat back and just watched as they did millions of dollars' worth of damage to property, and caused injury to many, to keep ONE MAN from telling his side of things. This is what liberals HATE, and wish to "stamp out." Dissension from their stupid ideas. Word is that the cops were told to "stand down" and allow all this, which the lack of arrests shows they DID. In addition, even though they told us these rioters were "students," they were NOT. They were PAID rioters; paid to disrupt and damage as many things as they could, hopefully to make it easier for the people who want to "rule us" to "take over." Colleges, which used to be "bastions of free speech," are now "ruled" by "political correctness," which is just another term meaning CENSORSHIP. And the people being censored are those WANTING free speech and the right to make their own decisions. (James Baxley)

Tyke Does the Right Thing

An 8-year-old girl was walking along a road with her parents and found a gun that turned out to be loaded. Instead of picking it up and maybe shooting herself or someone else, like uninstructed children sometimes do, she went immediately to her mom and told her about it, like the NRA teaches children to do when they find a gun. The cops were called, found the gun to be loaded, and heaped praise on her for "doing the right thing." Did the anti-gun fools do likewise? Surely you jest! The anti-gun fools didn't take the time or effort to praise her. All they did was villify guns--and the NRA--as usual. Would that we could teach more toddlers to do this, but the anti-gun fools say there's no such program. Wait--there IS!--the NRA has one, but the anti-gun fools want to IGNORE everything GOOD the NRA does. So they deny it. Everything they do proves that all they want to do is DISARM law-abiding people--and that's ALL. And they lie a lot, to do it. The NRA's "Eddie Eagle" gun safety program has been HATED by anti-gun fools since 1998. They'd rather see dead or injured kids than allow ANY NRA program to succeed. (Gun Free Zone)

Gun Grabbers Lie Again

The "Violence Policy Center," a well-known anti-gun outfit KNOWN for putting out LYING numbers, has done it again. They just out out a report slandering all concealed carriers. It says "firearm permit holders have killed 921 people (not in self defense or in defense of others) since 2007." which is an absolute LIE. First, only THREE permit holders killed anybody in TEN YEARS. Further, fully ONE-THIRD of the "murders" they cite were SUICIDES. They omit the fact that MOSTLY people who have ILLEGAL guns, WITHOUT permits commit MOST of those murders. That is the main fallacy in ALL their law-making regarding guns. ALL the "murders" that concern them so much were committed by people WITHOUT permits, and their current laws can do NOTHING to stop them. There are currently 14.5 MILLION permit holders in the U. S., and if permit holders did the killing, you'd damned sure NOTICE it, I guarantee you! These are yet more of the PHONY figures put out by this dishonest, anti-gun outfit that other gun-grabbers rely on for their phony figures. (Patriot Post)

"Conditions Are Too Strict"

That's what Mexican Drug Lord El Chapo says. But conditions CAN'T be "too strict" to suit me. You loosen up for him, and he escapes. He did that several times when imprisoned in Mexico, and authorities here are determined that it will not happen here. Frankly, I think his communication with his lawyer ought to be monitored, too, so he can't use that lawyer as a conduit to give orders to his thugs. I'm really surprised the Mexicans allowed him to be brought here, since he has paid so many of them off. His being brought here could mean the END for him--at least, as a "drug lord." With all the crimes he has committed, and CAUSED to be committed at his orders, he should not ever see the light of day again, in his lifetime. The only way he should leave prison is on a slab--and they'd better make sure he's really dead when he does. (NewsMax)

Incredible Stupidity

Cops are REQUIRED to be armed while on duty. Michael Zuby, a cop in Pennsylvania who was also employed by Wal-Mart for security, entered the store while on duty as a cop to buy something. His boss at the store told him he had to "get rid of the gun" wile in the store, to which he replied that he was required by law to be armed while he was on duty, and he was on duty, and refused. So they FIRED him and even asked his police chief not to send HIM to the store if they called for police assistance. That request was also refused. So he is suing Wal-Mart for their incredible stupidity in REQUIRING an on-duty COP to disarm himself while on duty and firing him as security for the store when he refused. Nobody ever said private employers were smarter than politicians, and this proves it. It reminds me of the "concealed carry" law in one state where the gun carried must be UNLOADED. Stupid! I suppose they think an ILLEGALLY-armed bad guy will politely wait while his victim loads his gun when attacked. (WREG)

Chicago Not the Worst

Trace, a known anti-gun fool web site. is now saying Chicago is NOT the worst place to live if you want to not be shot and killed. They base it on population figures, not total deaths. So Chicago has less killings per 100,000 population than some other cities. This is true. But it doesn't mean their gun laws WORK.Nor does it make people safer in cities with less population. It is just a different way of reading the numbers. Chicago still had 762 murders last year, with most of them accomplished by a gun. Other cities with smaller populations can outstrip Chicago in killings per 100,000 citizens, but it doesn't change the fact that Chicago is the most dangerous place to live, period! Their fool "gun laws" (many of which are so draconian they've been declared unconstitutional) haven't made a single DENT in the number of gun deaths, but they keep making them, and more people die, every day. The simple cure here is for law-abiding citizens to be able to have their own guns for self-defense, but they will not hear of it. They're just not smart enough. (The Trace)

Clinton's SCOTUS Pick

This article says that, without the NRA, we'd now be reading about Hillary Clinton's Supreme Court pick instead of Trump's. I don't know how true that is, although I'm sure the NRA had a big say in the presidential election, and will soon benefit from it, That means the millions of Americans who are members (and many who are not) will also benefit. But don't think the fight is over. NEVER think that. The anti-gun fools are deeply entrenched in all state legislatures, AND the U. S, Congress, and will "fight to the death" to take away our constitutional right to own and use the means to self defense, a gun. We have to remain vigilant, and oppose them strongly on every front, or they'll slip their tiny laws right in behind us, making them loom larger. (Ammoland)

Watts Throws A Tantrum

It must be very irritating to be an anti-gun fool these days, especially the "mouthpiece" for a billionaire anti-gun fool (former NYC Mayor Bloomberg). Recently Shannon Watts (boss of MOMS Against Guns, or something like that) tried to tout her "achievements" in taking away our gun rights, but couldn't--there AREN'T any. So recently she "threw an Internet tantrum," criticizing NRA TV host Grant Stinchfield, then refusing to come on his show to defend her LIES. She criticized Kimberly Corban, a rape survivor who wants to carry a gun to prevent another rape. There was no tantrum when a woman was thrown in jail in New Jersey for carrying a LEGAL gun. Nor when football star Ray Rice got off with a "wrist slap" after beating his girlfriend, or when an ISIS-inspired gunman opened fire in a crowded night club in Orlando and murdered 49 people in a "gun-free zone?" (America's First Freedom)

We're Losing HIck!

Governor Hickenlooper, of Colorado, has been one of the staunchest supporters of the stupid "gun laws" passed by anti-gun fools, and is nearing the end of his second term. Thank God for term limits. Now maybe we'll get a governor with some INTELLIGENCE who recognizes the fact that NONE of their "gun laws" do anything to reduce gun violence. Instead, they INCREASE it by DISARMING honest, law-abiding people, making them DEFENSELESS against all the ILLEGAL guns out there already in the hands of criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists. I live in Colorado, and I'm glad to see the back side of this fool as a new governor takes over. I just hope Republicans, who are a majority in Colorado everywhere but Denver, are smart enough to elect somebody a little smarter. The news media talks about all the DEMOCRATS who are "lining up" to replace him, completely ignoring any Republicans who will be in the race. (America's First Freedom)

It's Trump's Pen Now

Obama (in)famously bragged that he "had a pen and a phone" and "didn't need the Congress" to make laws. Well, now Trump has the pen and the phone, and he's using them to their best advantage: to reverse Obama's outrages. Today, he's reversing his first of many Obama's executive orders designed to hamstring gun sales in the United States. And he has plans to rescind many more, along with all the other destructive executive orders (and a few actual laws) Obama signed in order to hamstring his administration. He's going to be spending a lot of time in the coming days doing the same, both by executive order and by acts of Congress. He promised to do that, and he is making a good beginning. (Ammoland)

Unconstitutional Regulations

Louisville, KY, following the Constitution, BARS cities in KY from making unconstitutional regulations, but Louisville wants to do it, anyway. What part of UNCONSTITUTIONAL do they not understand? They have many statistics about the 497 shooting victims in Louisville last year, but one is suspiciously missing: the number of shootings and killings that were accomplished with ILLEGAL guns. That's an important statistic, but the anti-gun fools ignore it. They make all kinds of rules about guns for the law-abiding to obey, ignoring the fact that CRIMINALS don't obey ANY kind of laws, much less their piddling "gun laws," most of which are unconstitutional, anyway. (Courier-Journal)

It's Another Trend

And one the anti-gun fools HATE! Seventeen states will soon allow concealed carry without a permit. I predict that gun crime will ultimately go down in those states after a short spike while law-abiding people kill those with ILLEGAL guns who want to victimize them. Apparently, many politicians, in many states, are "wising up" to the reality that they can't stop those who wish to do ill from getting their illegal guns, and that honest, law-abiding people need to be able to "level the playing field" by being armed, themselves. Back a hundred years ago, out West, anyway, they realized that fact, before the fools who lived in the "civilized East" spread their poison westward. They CLAIM that allowing everybody to be armed caused a "wild west atmosphere" that led to many people being killed. But "Westerns" aside, very few people were killed by "gunslingers," and each time it happened, it reduced their numbers by one. I hope I'm still alive when all 50 states have similar laws, but I probably won't be, (Crime Prevention Research Center)