Killing Their Own Credibility

That's what Democrat operatives are doing. They're never going to let go of the "Russia hacked the election to help Trump" narrative, no matter how many times it is debunked as something that actually AFFECTED the election. It's a "four-year story." Maybe an 8 year story, if Trump wins re-election in 2020. It will have been proven to be false, but they will continue to insist it's true, in spite of that. And they will "pile on" as more phony stories come up, and will insist they're true in SPITE of them being proved to be a false narrative. Pretty soon, NOBODY will believe any of their stories--except for "died-in-the-wool Democrats who believe ANYTHING put out by the "leadership." Then, Trump could get away with MURDER because nobody (except Democrat fools) will believe anything they put out. Their credibility will have been destroyed, and they will have done it to themselves. (Just common sense)

"Obama Failed"

Obama's biggest failure is that he wasn't able to strip our right to be armed away from us (he thinks). Many times he tried, and many times he failed. That should have told him something, but it didn't. He hasn't the intelligence to realize he is not only attempting to legislate against the Constitution, but against the will of the American people, as well. Like a savant, he is very smart in some ways, but completely IGNORANT in others. The whole idea that he SHOULD "strip way our gun rights" is one of those. Fully 16 times, he has had to speak about "mass shootings" that have occurred, and he thinks that requires him to take away LEGAL gun rights, completely ignoring the fact that mostly, the "bad guys" who commit gun crimes are NOT legal gun owners. And the MAJORITY of gun crimes happen in "gun-free zones," where the presence of a LEGALLY armed person might have saved some lives. Now we have someone in that office (After Jan. 20, anyway) who might make a difference. We shall see. You'll notice the source for this is the John BIrch Society. That should not discredit it, for I've found, over the years, that they have been a reliable source, no matter how much liberals hate them. In fact, if liberals DIDN'T hate them, I would be some suspicious of them as a source. (JBS)

A Party of Fools

In case you didn't know it, that describes the Democrat Party. They scoffed when Donald Trump announced that he was running for president. There were 17 other Republicans running against him for the nomination. Everybody (all Democrats, many Republicans) thought he was a joke. He did things no politician had ever done before and they said, many times, he was finished. And he continued on, while his opponents fell by the wayside, one by one. They accused him of sexual misconduct. As is usual, many women spoke up and said he had sexually abused them, with no more proof than their unsupported word. But, unlike with Bill Cosby and Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, nobody (of any consequence) believed them, and they too, fell by the wayside They told us right along, that Trump "couldn't win," that he was "unfit for the presidency," and would soon fall out. He did not. Soon the impossible happened. He was the president elect, and they continue "flailing about" trying to stop him, with no success at all. (Just common sense)

It's DEMOCRAT Fake News

The Democrats are really upset over "fake news" they SAY is coming from right-wing sources. One of those is Fox, another is Breitbart, and many others, including NRA. But the biggest purveyor of "fake news" is the Democrat Party. One of the best known recently is the story that Russia has some "damaging information" on Trump, but they won't release it, because there ISN'T any. It's all in their fevered minds, All it is, is an effort to convince the country that there IS "damaging information" out there about Trump, even though we'll never see it. And they'll attribute that to a "Trump coverup." They know all about coverups. They're good at it, because they've had to cover up so much. That's more that resides in the "fevered brains" of Democrats. Another is the story about Russia "hacking us" in an effort to help Trump get elected, because they like him. Yes, Russia hacked us. EVERYBODY hacks us, and we hack them. Hacking is a regular part of inter-country relations. It was NOT an effort to help Trump get elected. It was "information gathering," pure and simple. But the Democrats seized on it, hoping to delegitimize Trump's election. (Yahoo Finance)

Stop the Presses!

Big news! Unprecedented! Chicago has actually gone FOUR DAYS just before Christmas without a fatal shooting! They'll probably tout this as being the result of their tight gun laws. They're fools like that, in Chicago. Maybe it's just that all the potential shooters are too busy with their Christmas shopping to shoot anybody. It gets pretty bad when LACK of killings is big news. But that's the way it is in Rahm Emanuel's Chicago. Their gun murder rate is so bad it skews the national averages, and makes the rest of the country look bad. The bad part of it is those same "officials" have a "deaf ear" to ways to stem gun violence, for real. They really think CRIMINALS, who don't obey laws, will somehow obey the anti-gun laws they make, which only serve to make it easier for ILLEGAL gun owners to victimize the law-abiding. They just will not see that. (Chicago Sun-Times)

One More Outrage

Obama seems to be piling up the outrages these days. He apparently wants to do as much damage as he can, so Trump will be so busy reversing his outrages that he won't be able to get to repealing Obamacare very soon. For the first time, he didn't veto the UN's interference in the internal affairs of Israel, something that will not be easy to reverse, if not impossible. Then he made a "rules change" (something not requiring congressional approval) making it impossible for people like me, at near 80 years of age and DEFENSELESS against the young fools who look upon me as "easy pickings," to get the means to "level the field" when they accost me. They now have banned anybody getting SSI for a disability from being able to have a gun for self defense. One more outrage in his long list, but fortunately, this one is easy for Trump to reverse. I guess criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists haven't killed as many "old folks" with disabilities to suit Obama and he wants to make it easier for them (the bad guys). I hate to say something like this about our outgoing president (good riddance), but it has become ever more clear that he wishes us ill and is going to do as much as he can to injure, or kill us before he "rides off into the sunset." (Federal Register)

Just "Tweak It" Some

Trump and the Republicans are determined to repeal and replace Obamacare. And repeal would be a good thing, IF they had something good ready to replace it. But they don't need to repeal it altogether. All they need to do is get rid of some of the stupidities built in that make it so expensive. Number one on that list should be the MANDATORY nature of the plan. Making it mandatory is only necessary for the socialists promoting it, to make sure younger, healthier people pay without using it, while "old duffers" use it more. And to FORCE people to buy their "insurance" is not only unconstitutional, it is stupid. Another is the lack of a prohibition for "pre-existing conditions." That makes it not only prohibitively expensive for the insurance companies--enough to make them opt out of the program or just go out of the health insurance business, it is the stupidest part of Obamacare. It takes it out of the realm of insurance into welfare.

There are other stupidities such as requiring pregnancy coverage for MEN. "One fits all," in other words, It probably requires testicle surgery coverage for women, too. It's that kind of a program. But they don't need to "throw the baby out with the bath water" if they want any kind of government program paying for health care. If they think it's necessary, just pay for a simple insurance policy for everybody and cover everything (except pre-existing conditions"). If you're going to spend all that money, make it SIMPLE. That's usually the least expensive, anyway. I don't know why ALL "government programs" are so complicated. I guess it's to keep the level of bureaucrat jobs high. Like Bush's program to pay for medicine for Social Security recipients with its "donut hole" where when you get to a certain point in medicine paid for by the government, suddenly you're on your own until you've paid for a lot more out of pocket, at a time when you can't afford it, then it pays forever. You don't NEED such complications to be built in, unless you're promoting government jobs. (Just common sense)

Mislabeling Shootings

"Everytown Against Guns (or something like that) published a list of "school shootings" which included many shootings that were NOT "school shootings," but were NEAR schools. One, which "Bearing Arms" calls "disgusting," was a POLICE shooting in El Centro, TX, a suburb of Dallas, where a thug killed FIVE police officers, then FLED to a school, where he was found, and killed. At NO TIME did he threaten students, or faculty. But a school was PERIPHERALLY involved, so Everytown called it a "school shooting." Like they did in Ava, MO, where two FORMER students returned to their old school and had a shootout in the PARKING LOT, with one committing suicide. Apparently Everytown adds it to their list whenever a .shooting happens within mile or two of a school. They keep doing this, no matter how many times they're "found out," and insist their lists are "true and accurate." Which tells me a lot about them. Michael Bloomberg, former New York mayor, is at the bottom of this, while he rides around in an armored car, behind a phalanx of ARMED security, while he works HARD to deny us the same right.(Bearing Arms)

Record Gun Sales

Records show 2.6 MILLION guns sold, just in December--and the month isn't even over, yet. That's the culmination of 17 MILLION guns sold this year! December sales look like there are many people giving guns as Christmas gifts. That "falls behind" the 2015 figure of 2.42 million, which was a record at that time. But it contributed to record overall sales for this year. Researchers say this "uptick" in gun sales is fueled by the recent mass shootings and the "regular" shootings in Chicago. People want NOT to be defenseless when criminal shooters come to their area. And they will. They LIVE there. Nobody talks about the millions of ILLEGAL guns sold each year, because nobody can count them. So they ignore them, and try their best to limit LEGAL gun sales, which does NOTHING to reduce criminal shootings, and instead, INCREASES the number by making law-abiding people DEFENSELESS. The incompetence of the anti-gun fools proceeds apace. (Ammoland)

"If They Can Opt Out"

Democrats complain about removing the FORCED participation in Obamacare, because "allowing this would remove healthy people from the mix, and make the plan unworkable." Yet to human beings, that is not an argument FOR Obamacare, but AGAINST it. It is PURE SOCIALISM, penalizing those capable and willing to earn their own way for the benefit of those not willing. Stealing from those able and willing and giving to those who are NOT, is not right, in ANY case. And a plan based on that is definitely the WRONG way to go. Only dishonest people support it. Democrats are just plain SOCIALISTS. All their proposed "plans" involve stealing from those who produce new wealth, for the benefit of those who don't, for whatever reason. This country was BASED on the free market, after an abortive experiment in collectivism that resulted in many deaths from starvation FAILED, and that is the reason why we outstripped countries that have been around for thousands of years, in less than 300 years. The reason people from all over the world come here to improve their lot. Socialism does NOT work, because it does not create ANY new wealth, but depends on stealing (through taxes) from those who DO create new wealth, for the befit of those who do NOT. (Just common sense)

"Parting Shots"

Plural. Obama is not content to leave ONE "parting shot." He has to leave several. Shots he KNOWS will displease the incoming president, and he really thinks he has made provisions to keep Trump from reversing everything he has ever done to destroy this nation. His latest is a set of "regulations" designed to further injure the coal industry, the one he promised to destroy. But it isn't going to do him any good. Trump will "sweep away" all his depredations, the minute he gains office. He CLAIMS he will be "helping" Trump, while all the time doing everything he can to IMPEDE him. Trump can stop this easily, simply by telling everybody responsible for ENFORCING these onerous regulations that, to make ANY attempt to enforce Obama's regulations will mean their jobs immediately that he becomes president. He doesn't need to be inaugurated yet to do that. (Fox News)

Proof of the Pudding

The anti-gun fools keep saying that arming law-abiding individuals will not do anything to reduce crime because they are more likely to shoot themselves than criminals. This in spite of sure evidence it's a LIE. In Texas, people are still getting their guns, and break-in artists (and other armed criminals) are still getting shot. Which reduces the crime that would have been committed in the future by these fools. That's a definite refutation of what the anti-gun fools are saying. And it happens all th time, not just in Texas. In many states where they are loosening gun laws and allowing honest, law-abiding people to have guns to use in self defense. We've been saying for years that arming law-abiding people are the answer to "gun crime," and the anti-gun fools will not hear of it. They still believe they can stop criminals (who do not OBEY laws) from getting guns by making a LAW. People do not "go crazy" and shoot each other, just because they get to carry a gun, as they say. I had a concealed carry permit once, in Indiana, and I didn't kill anyone over a parking space. Neither do most law-abiding people, which is a good "leveling" action to oppose the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there. (Wheel Gun)

"Must Be Mainstrem"

The Democrats say they will not vote for any of Trump's appointments that are "not mainstream." Which would be fine, except they are the ones who DEFINE "mainstream," and they define it to mean, "he/she agrees with us." And they know Trump is not going to appoint ANYBODY whose political views agree with theirs. They still can't get it through their thick heads that they LOST the election. They really think they are still running things in DC. They are NOT. And Trump WILL prevail. They can "flail and whine" as much as they want, and it will do them no good. They figure everybody who doesn't agree with their socialist views is NOT "mainstream." That they are the only people in DC who ARE "mainstream." But they are NOT. And they found it out on Nov. 8th when Trump won the presidency by a HUGE margin, and Republicans, all over the country, unseated many Democrats. They lost a BUNCH of governorships, and more legislative offices than their feeble minds can even contemplate. (Just common sense)

Releasing Gun-Toting Criminals

Obama CLAIMS he is trying to REDUCE gun crime, while his every action is guaranteed to INCREASE it. Many of the criminals he just pardoned, or whose sentences he reduced, were in prison for GUN CRIMES. How does he justify that? He doesn't; he just ignores it. If asked about it, he "clams up" and either says nothing, or "filibusters" the answer. Big cities now have a very high "gun crime" rate, mostly fueled by Obama's home town, Chicago, where, coincidentally, they have some of the tightest gun laws in the nation. So tight, in fact, that some have been declared unconstitutional. Actually, it's not a coincidence; it is a "causative action," meaning those tight gun laws FUEL gun violence. Thus, Chicago is a "war zone" where more people have been killed than IN a REAL war zone, like Iraq or Afghanistan in the same amount of time. (America's First Freedom)

What Are "Superdelegates?"

Hillary knows, and so does Bernie Sanders. They're the Democrat Party's way of making sure the candidate THEY want to win the primaries gets the most delegates, no matter how many primaries the other candidate wins. That's how they screwed Bernie out of the nomination, even though he won the most primaries. Not that I wish Bernie had won--I don't. But I wish he had lost FAIRLY. If he had won, he'd been even easier to beat than Hillary. But I hate cheaters, and that's plainly what the Democrat Party is. Hillary should NOT have gotten the Democrat nomination, so "winning" more popular votes than Trump just doesn't count. She probably got those the same way she beat Bernie.

That's how Hillary and the Democrat Party operate. They "fix it" in ways we can't even think of so they win as often as possible. They think nothing of lying, ballot stuffing, cheating, and I'd even bet murder to attain their goals. And their main one is changing this country from a free market country (which has allowed us to outdo countries that have been around for thousands of years, in little under 300 years) into a socialist country (socialism being a THEFT culture based on STEALING from the PRODUCER of new wealth for the benefit of the "drones" of society), a system that has NEVER worked. Russia is one example, Venezuela is another. (Just common sense)

Legalizing Child Prostitution

California lawmakers aren't that stupid, are they? Apparently they are, as witness one of their most recent laws, which makes child prostitution LEGAL. They CLAIM that they feel child prostitution would be better handled otherwise than sending them through the criminal investigation "system," but the basic effect of the law is to make child prostitution LEGAL. We know they aren't too smart, as witness their anti-gun legislation, but this really "takes the cake." I would not bring my children into California, nor would I recommend my son bring HIS children there. I'm ashamed of the fact that I used to live in this really ignorant state, and proud of the fact that I left it, and never went back. (Liberty Headlines)

Wailing and Gnashing of Teeth

The anti-gun fools are mortified that so many places are increasing the issuance of "concealed carry" licenses. For them, way too many "irresponsible" gun handlers are getting licenses to carry their HATED guns. Now, in S. Carolina, one ignorant REPUBLICAN wants DMV to issue stickers to be REQUIRED to be placed on the license plates of people who have concealed carry permits. What part of "concealed" does this fool not understand? They're so afraid people will have the means to defend themselves against the MILLIONS of illegal guns out there that they want to do ANYTHING to let the "bad guys" know who has that means. It is this kind of damned foolishness that makes it OBVIOUS that their intent is to make honest people DEFENSELESS against those "bad guys." Not "get rid of guns," as they say. If they did want to "get rid of guns" in the hands of malefactors, they wouldn't do stupid things like this. This is very much like the "Star of David" the Nazis required Jews to wear during the holocaust. (Gun Free Zone)

Kasich Okays "Campus Carry"

Ohio Governor John Kasich has done a lot of stupid things. Like thinking first, that he had a chance to be elected president against the "steamroller" of Donald Trump. And then refusing to face reality as he lost, time and time again, in the primaries, to refusing, again, to face reality after Trump won the nomination. But the other day, he did something right. We've been saying, for a long time, that allowing staff, and in some places, STUDENTS to be armed on campus, was the best way to keep potential mass shooters away from campus. That uniformed "security officers" don't work, because potential shooters KNOW they're armed, and can isolate and "dispense with them" early, before any other killing starts. But not knowing who might be armed is the STRONGEST way to discourage them. Kasich now realizes that, and that's why he didn't veto the "campus carry" bill in Ohio. By doing so, there's no way of knowing how many lives he saved. (Breitbart)

Democrat Panic

There are many small demonstrations going on, in a number of places, screaming that "Donald Trump is not COMPETENT to be president!" They cry that he will NEVER "occupy" the Oval Office! How they're going to stop him, I don't know, with a majority of real Americans voting him into office, I don't know. Maybe they plan on killing him, I don't know. That's the ONLY way they're going to make that snivel come true The Democrats PAID people to foment riots to support their position, trying to make it LOOK like a majority of the American people are against Trump. But it ain't a workin'! They think Trump is going to "destroy the country." But what he IS going to do is destroy "THEIR country." He is going to get rid of the liberal moles who have dug their way deep into the body of this government, and they are deathly afraid of that, because they know THEY are those moles. They make a big thing about Hillary getting more POPULAR votes than Trump, hiding the fact that FOUR MILLION illegal aliens voted ILLEGALLY in this election, yet they could only get 2 million more popular votes counted. They tried all their dirty tricks and election stealing scams, and he won by so much they were not effective. (Just common sense)

Creating Racism

Liberals are in the process of CREATING racism where none actually exists, by claiming everything under the sun is White against black racism and even teaching that in colleges, and soon in schools. What they're doing is "legitimizing" black against white racism, and making it the law of the land, as white against black racism used to be because it was created and supported by Democrats. Democrats, for instance, CREATED the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) an outfit STARTED to keep blacks down. Jim Crow was a Democrat, and Martin Luther King's demonstrations were AGAINST Democrat policies. And I'd bet, if the media looked deeper, his killer was a Klan member. There were many obvious racists in Congress, (and probably still are, though better hidden) and were celebrated. One of them was Robert Byrd, who was, at one time, a "Grand Kleagle' in the Klan, and has so many things in his state named after him he couldn't even remember them all before he mercifully died before he could do any more damage. (Blabber Buzz)

Sweeping the Country

School Boards and legislatures all over the country are "considering" and even sometimes APPROVING allowing school staff to be armed. It has been approved and written into law in some places, and is close to being approved in Horry County, SC (what a name!). But they're fighting over who should be allowed, at the school, to say "yea of nay" on each individual who wants to carry his gun into the school. One gun store owner says, "Why should you lose your Second Amendment rights because of your job choice or what building you go into?" He said further, "I think this is a much better choice than to simply advise children to hide under their desks or jump out the window." They may be fighting over details, but they're moving in the right direction. Having armed people NOT in a uniform so they can be "picked off" before the actual shooting begins is the best idea. (WMBF News)

The Mayflower Compact

Aside from the Constitution, the Mayflower Compact, which EVERY potential colonist signed before being allowed to set foot on land, bound them to accept ANY government created by the “Civil Community Politic,” which was empowered to make “just and equal laws, ordinances, Acts, compacts and Constitutions and Offices.” It was this “Civil Community Politic” that created and enacted the Constitution if the United States to be the BASIS for any and ALL laws for the United Sates. What has not been taught is that the original system, which was inherently collectivist, caused the first year there to be a DISASTER because it kept all the land as being owned by the entire group and all persons were given one section. He/she would enjoy the “fruits” of EVERYBODY’S LABOR, whether he/she worked or not. This removed any INCENTIVE to work and is why most of the colony, including the governor’s wife, die of starvation or of illness brought on by malnutrition. So Governor Bradford changed it. The land was still divided up, but the colonist who did not work would have no part in the “fruits” of others' labors. With incentive returned, the colony prospered. This has purposely not been taught by those who favor collectivism over the free market. And as long as those people (the liberals) control most of the media and education, it will NEVER be taught. (Just common sense)

Playing the Game

The liberals better be careful with their "fake news" crap. Two can play at that game, and the right has many more examples of "fake news" put out by the left than they'll ever find *(unless they falsify them) on the right. Yes, we're already looking, but I predict that, as they "fact-check" "right-wing sources," we will intensify our search and "fact-check" the LEFT-wing news sources, most of which are engaged in spreading 'fake news" every day. One recent example is the liberal media's handling of the young Muslim woman who CLAIMED (falsely) that she was attacked in the subway, had her hijab removed, and it was all done by men shouting "Trump!" They uncritically, and with NO fact-checking, ran with the story until the cops, after further investigation determined it was a false report, and arrested her. Turns out she was already in trouble with her parents for her lifestyle and was out drinking and wanted to divert her father's anger. There are many more examples, and everybody remembers the TV story about Chevy trucks "exploding" that was falsified by a network. Then there are the phony stories liberal media spouts to advance their narrative against guns. They'd better be careful what they raise. It might raise against THEM. (Just common sense)

"Guns for Cops Only"

The anti-gun fools maintain that only cops are smart enough to have guns. That if "average people" get to carry guns, it would create a "wild west atmosphere" where people would be shooting each other over parking places and slow service. Cops don't do that, they say. They can't say that any more (though they will), because of the drunken deputy federal marshal who stumbled into a Brooklyn McDonald's (only in New York) and, when he wasn't instantly served, pulled his gun and scared the hell out of the 41-year-old counterman, and the rest of the customers. While he was menacing everybody, his order came up. He paid, and left, but the cops found him and arrested him for menacing, harassment, and violating firearms licensing regulations. I would say his career as a law enforcement agent is probably over now, and for good reason. But this proves cops are just as likely (more likely, maybe) to "go off the deep end" and use their guns irresponsibly. But that doesn't make it something that happens all the time with cops, nor will it happen if normal citizens are allowed their constitutional right to be armed for self defense. (NY Post)

Was Scalia Murdered?

The facts of the case suggest that he was, and the murder was covered up with the cooperation of all "authorities" connected to the "investigation." When someone so influential dies suddenly, not under a doctor's direct care, no matter how old, and under such questionable circumstances, DEMANDS an intensive investigation, which his death did NOT get. The judge, who was a justice of the peace, said an autopsy was not necessary, and made her determination OVER THE PHONE. Anybody with a lick of sense knows that is INCOMPETENCE or a cover up of MURDER. Scalia was in the house of a Clinton friend, and was found with a pillow over his head. That last should DEMAND a thorough investigation, which it did not get. Scalia was an OBSTACLE to the liberal wish to "stack the Supreme Court" with liberals for the next few decades.

Murdering him could change the history of this entire country. And with the record of the Clintons AND the Obamas in that, his death should have been gone over with a fine-tooth comb." It was NOT. Will his death EVER be properly investigated? CAN it ever be properly investigated? This judge did something similar in another case, where a woman seems to have been placed, unconscious, on a railroad track, to be run over by a train. The judge said in this case too, that an autopsy was not necessary, since the "cause of death was obvious." It was NOT. And a proper autopsy might have revealed that. But we'll never know because the judge rushed to have the body cremated without the family's permission. Was this woman a sexual partner of a local politician who might have been ready to reveal it? And was her death staged to LOOK like she was killed by the train? Was this justice of the peace colluding with her murderer, as she possibly was in Scalia's case? (DC Clothesline)

Trump"s Greatest Strength

His greatest strength has been given to him by his opponents. It is the fact that they have so consistently underestimated him, and still do. When he entered the fray, they said he wouldn't last a month. He had too much competition. Then little by little, the competition "melted away." They said he couldn't win the primaries. Then he won the primaries in a convincing manner. Then they said he'd never get enough delegates to win the nomination.

Then he got enough delegates to win the nomination. They took a deep breath and said, "Okay; he got the nomination, but he can't beat Hillary. Then he beat Hillary like a drum. They then said that, even though he won the election, he'd never get to occupy the Oval Office. so where do you think he's going to be in the afternoon of January 20th? They "pulled out all the stops" to prevent him from getting enough electoral votes to be confirmed as president.

They really thought they could get 37 electors to change their votes and vote against him, even though their states went FOR him. So what are they going to do now they've confirmed him as president? They're going to say he isn't a "proper president." since Hillary got more votes than he did in the popular vote. Most of those votes were "cast" by illegal aliens, convicted felons, and dead people (mostly in Chicago). But he was elected by the method we've used ever since this country was begun, and which is THE LAW, whether they like it or not, when they LOSE (not a peep out of Democrats when they WIN that way).

They're just going to have to accept the fact that he won, fair and square, even though they played ALL their "dirty tricks" to keep him out of the Oval Office. They LOST, and they're going to have to accept it in the long run. They can whine and carp all they want, but he WILL be the president, at least for the next four years. And if America (not the liberals) like what he does, EIGHT years. The backs of the Democrats have been "broken." They'd better get used to it. (Just common sense)

Hillary's Delusion

She thinks ANY effort to keep her from the presidency is subversion of our country. She just can't understand the fact that America is TIRED of being LOOTED by Democrats, and DID something about it. She can't accept the fact that she was a completely UNSUITABLE candidate, and the voters voted accordingly. Her presidency would have equaled a THIRD TERM for Obama, and the voters didn't want anything to do with that, He has done enough to ruin this country's economy, while he causes racism to prosper. She thinks, like most elite liberals, that they have a "divine right" to "rule" us, and nobody else should have that right. She KNOWS Trump is going to upset many applecarts, and she will be responsible for it. And she doesn't want that, as she "rides off into the sunset" with Obama and the rest of his crowd. (American Thinker)

Government Con Games

One of the biggest con games is run by the federal government. They have many cons they use to fool us into believing things. One of them is that Medicare pays 80% of the medical costs for us "old folks." They do NOT. The first thing they do upon getting the bill for a medical procedure, or just an office visit, it to slash it in half. Then they pay 80% of THAT. They say it is 80%, but it is actually 40% of the actual bill. But they insist they pay 80%, so the doctors double their rates so they get paid what they should be paid, anyway, giving the feds an excuse to accuse them of "padding their bills." Another con is the "baseline budget," where every agency gets a 10% INCREASE very year and, if Congress reduces that INCREASE by any amount, they CALL it a CUT!" These are cons that, if run by individual citizens, they'd put them in prison and throw away the key. But they get away with it, because all politicians, of both parties, say the same things. Some are just repeating the lie, and others "bought the BS." (Just common sense)

Impeaching Trump

Yet another demented idea the Democrats are promoting is IMPEACHING Donald Trump, before he's even inaugurated. How do you impeach an office holder before he even takes office? And on what grounds would they impeach him? There is nothing he's ever done to rate impeachment, except in their feeble MINDS. Their OPINIONS, in other words. Democrats seem to think they have the "divine right of kings" to "rule over us," and nobody else should EVER get a chance. When he won the election by a landslide, they lost their minds! They KNOW he's going to "upset their little applecarts," and they can't have that. So they're "pulling out all the stops" in an effort to keep him from ever taking office. They're "throwing all kinds of sh-t up against the wall, hoping SOMETHING will stick. (Patriot Powered News)

Guns In the Dorm

Wichita parents are "raising concerns" about "guns in the dorm" at their children's college. And they are right to do so, but their target is (as usual) wrong. It is the LEGAL guns they oppose, IGNORING the fact that there are ALREADY "guns in the dorm," ILLEGALLY. They completely IGNORE that factor. It doesn't even enter into their thinking. And that will get some of their kids KILLED. Frankly, they'd better get their thinking looking in the right direction and start SUPPORTING the current movement to arm school staff, who don't wear uniforms that IDENTIFY them to potential shooters, so they can be "dispensed with" before any other shooting begins. The mere PRESENCE of guns on campus does NOT pose a danger to students. It is the hands those guns are IN that might. And that is what they never consider. (KSNT)

Blatant Hypocrisy

Liberals are the real "Fascists" who want to CRIMINALIZE" those who disagree with them, especially in that mass SWINDLE called "global warming" (now called "climate change"). But also regarding the activities of radical Muslims, some of whom have PROMISED to KILL all of us who refuse to "convert" to their phony "religion." Yet they continue to accuse Donald Trump of BEING a "Fascist," with NO PROOF of any Fascist actions on his part. Today in the Doonesbury cartoon (Doonesbury if a "flaming liberal"), they BLATANTLY compared Breitbart News to the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) one of the MOST racist organizations going, and which was STARTED by Democrats, to keep blacks down. Breitbart is one of the FEW news sources that tells the TRUTH about both sides, which liberals HATE. What they consider racism is covering the news HONESTLY. (Doonesbury)

Making Us Defenseless

They will vehemently deny it, but anti-gun fools have only one purpose in their INSANE laws. They're all designed to make Americans DEFENSELESS against all the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of criminals, crazies, and now Islamic terrorists, who have PROMISED to kill everybody who won't "convert" to their phony "religion." They always give us good-sounding reasons for their foolishness, but the laws they promote (and get passed by fool legislators) tell the tale. Gun safes, for example. And gun locks. And "Gun-free ones" where only law-abiding people don't bring their guns, while people who don't obey laws bring theirs, and have no trouble victimizing the people who DO obey the law and are thus DEFENSELESS. (Just common sense)

Democrats In Denial

In November, 2016, they suffered the biggest election loss in recent history. The American people sent them a very clear message that they were TIRED of them forcing their ideas upon them. They dispensed with more Democrats at one time than at any other time in recent history. But Democrat House leader Nancy Peelosi says she "sees no need for a different platform." That shows a complete IGNORANCE on her part. Almost as ignorant as to have the temerity to tell Americans that they had to"pass the Obamacare law to find out what's in it." They think only that the American people just don't understand how beneficial their plans are. They can't swallow the truth. They're truly "in denial," and that has nothing to do with a river in Egypt. Stay stupid, Democrats! We like you that way. The stupider you are, the easier we can keep you from being able to screw us by keeping you from being elected to office. (Just common sense)