Stupid Crack of the Day

Gabby Giffords must have gotten her brain scrambled good when that jerk shot her in that parking lot. The other day she said, “Background checks are not required of felons.” No kiddin’ Gabby! Maybe that’s because they aren’t supposed to HAVE guns—period. But they always seem to have them when they want to victimize honest, law-abiding people. How do you do a background check on somebody who has an ILLEGAL gun, as most criminals do? So what’s your point, Gabby? You want to make a law REQUIRING felons to get background checks? How do you intend to enforce it? Most felons DO have extensive background checks. They’re called, “records.” Which is why your laws don’t allow them to have guns—which does NOTHING to keep them from HAVING the guns they use to victimize us, while, as law-abiding people, we OBEY your stupid laws, and are DEFENSELESS against those felons because of it.

She even gets Hillary wrong when she tells us she’s stupid enough to vote for her. She calls her a former U. S. Representative. She is NOT, and never has been. She has been a senator. The Democrats bought that for her. She has been Secretary of State, Obama gave that to her to keep her mouth shut. She failed miserably at both. And she has been “First Lady,” for which she did nothing except be married to the fool who was president, and stayed married to him through all his sexcapades, even DEFENDING him by “demonizing” the women he screwed, even the one(s) he RAPED!. I’ve never seen a SANE woman do that. Giffords says current law ALLOWS felons to get guns without background checks. Nothing could be further from the truth! Felons aren’t “ALLOWED” to have guns, PERIOD! So they get them ILLEGALLY, and “skip” the background check. She criticizes Sheriff Arpaio for wanting to enforce the law Obama wants to ignore. Talk about STUPIDITY! (Just common sense)

Anti-Gun Politician Loses

We didn't make a big thing of it when Hillary lost the election, but when she lost, the government lost one of the most virulent anti-gun fools in politics. She supported an "Australian-style gun buyback program," although they, themselves admit it did NOT work. They're decrying the number of ILLEGAL guns in Australia now, although they're planning to "do it again." She says she is "concerned about toddlers killing each other," but had no plans on how to prevent it, except to come as close to banning guns as she could. Mostly by making the guns we have USELESS. She thinks the Supreme Court is "wrong on the Second Amendment." How that is, is in question, since the Court merely supports what is WRITTEN in the Constitution. That CANNOT be wrong. An interesting factoid is that the NRA put money into FIVE pro-gun candidates, and won 4. That should tell you something about who's right. (Washington Free Beacon)

DOJ to FBI: "Stand Down!"

That’s the word given the FBI by an “official” of the Department of Justice (DOJ), according to the Wall Street Journal. When asked, by an assistant director if they were “ordering” the FBI to “back off” on a viable investigation, the DOJ “official” backed off, and said, “No.” But the DOJ has been doing everything it can to derail the investigation, and the FBI has been resisting. There was almost a rebellion IN the FBI over Comey’s announcement that, even though Hillary was guilty of many crimes, he wasn’t going to recommend prosecution because “she didn’t mean it,” regardless of the fact that INTENT “normally” made no difference when a law was broken. One law enforcement source says, “An avalanche of new information is coming in, every day.” It seems the DOJ was doing everything they could to get Hillary elected, and the FBI was trying to do its job. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama didn’t give Hillary a “blanket pardon” for any and all crimes she may have committed, as was done for Richard Nixon after he resigned. (Daily Caller)

Huma In Child Sex Scandal?

I’ve long figured out the reason Hillary and Abedin have stayed with their philandering husbands for so long, even knowing about their transgressions. They may be lesbians, and their husbands are their “beards.” But Huma left her husband recently, maybe because she discovered he was including their 3 (now 4) year old SON in his sexual fantasies. Maybe that became a little too much for her. Lesbianism on the part of two women who were so close in their careers could easily have been hidden, and might be the reason Hillary has not been accused of it, even though everybody in DC knew about it, Remember, all this is mostly rumor. (NY Post)

No Death Threats

The organizer of one of those seemingly "ubiquitous" anti-Trump "demonstrations" is now CLAIMING that she has "received death threats" Because of her role in organizing one of those "demonstrations." Of course, she has shown no PROOF of these "threats." She can't. They don't exist, unless they are manufactured. Making unsubstantiated claims like that is an OLD Democrat/liberal scam. One they have used since--forever. It's instructive to note that so far, ALL the violence committed during, and after this election has been done by anti-Trump forces (definition: Democrat/liberal) Republicans don't have time to do violence over a FAIR election. They have JOBS, and must get up early in the morning. Notice this report is put out by a self-identified BIASED outfit that says it has "been making "Tea Partiers" cry since 2009." Yeah, They cry with laughter at their antics! (Freak Out Nation)

Friend "Investigating" Clinton

Did you know that a high ranking man in the “investigation” of Hillary Clinton is an old friend of her campaign chairman, John Podesta? How in HELL is there ever going to be a REAL investigation with their close friends doing the “investigating?” This is the kind of political corruption (incest) there is in DC, and is probably the primary reason that, no matter what is discovered, nothing ever seems to be done about it. Peter Kadzik, an Assistant Attorney General, even DONATED to one of Podesta’s former campaigns. Kadzik contributed to Hillary THREE TIMES, $1,000 or more each. Which should have REQUIRED him to distance himself from the “investigation,” but he didn’t mention it. Even his WIFE, Amy Weiss, who worked as a House Deputy Assistant and Deputy Pres Secretary to Bill Clinton, also contributed! This is the kind of “incestuous relationship” you can expect when Democrats are involved. Podesta’s wife used the name “Weiss.” So her contributions to friends would not be connected to Kadzik? (Washington Free Beacon)

Invoking Trevon Martin

Hillary Clinton says, “I want to protect Americans from the epidemic of gun violence that is stalking our country.” And she mentioned Trevon Martin as if his death was not a “righteous shooting” by a man whose head he was banging against the sidewalk, trying to kill him. But there IS no “epidemic of gun violence!” Gun violence is at its lowest ebb EVER ( by government figures). Like most anti-gun fools, she uses false figures to make uninformed people BELIEVE there is an “epidemic of gun violence” so she can do more to disarm Americans so she and her liberal pals can better victimize them. It really amazes me how people like her can continue a LIE, even after it has been DISPROVED many times. They just keep repeating the lie, over and over. And uninformed people who never heard the refutation of the lie believe them. (Washington Examiner)

Why Protest So Much?

I know that a small number of people object to Donald Trump being elected president. Yes, it's a "small number of people." That was proven buy the fact that Trump won buy such a "huge" margin that even the sophisticated election fraud tactics used by Hillary Clinton's supporters couldn't sway the election in the direction of their "anointed one." Yes, it does LOOK like there are lots of people demonstrating, all over the country. But they still remain a distinct MINORITY. Which is why not only Trump won at the polls, hundreds, even thousands of Democrats LOST. Actually the "demonstrators fall into a very few groups. One, the PAID "demonstrators" who organize the whole thing. They find people who were against Trump and the Republicans all along, and con them into "demonstrating." The media makes it look like a major demonstration by showing only close up shots of a small gathering and talking admiringly about the "masses" of demonstrators, all over the country.

They say they're "afraid of violence," while they COMMIT violence. Another group is the "true believers" who would never have voted for Trump, in ANY case. It isn't hard to get these people to demonstrate. Yet another group is the "freeloaders," who see, in Trump, the "end of the gravy train" upon which they depend, so they can live without working, at the expense of others. It's all "sour grapes" by LOSERS. Another group is the thugs who will take any excuse to riot and loot, damaging and stealing other people's property. They will always be with us, and will take advantage of ANY "demonstration" to "do their thing." But the MAJORITY of Americans elected Trump and many more Republicans, and no amount of "demonstrating" *(rioting, looting, violence) will make that go away. Trump has not even been inaugurated yet, and some of those fools are trying to get him IMPEACHED, with no cause! We need to give him a chance to undo all the atrocities committed by Barack Hussein Obama.

If he doesn't, we can defeat him at the next election. The big problem with all these "protests" is that they are BASED on the LIES told them by the Democrats, none of which are true. But if you try to show that to these fools, you're likely to be the subject of the violence they SAY Trump stands for. They go up and down the streets chanting the Democrat lies, and CLAIMING they have gotten "death threats" for organizing their protest. But, as usual, no proof. They say they "just want their voices to be heard," but their voices WERE heard on Nov. 8. There just weren't enough freeloaders and sore losers to sway the elections. I just wonder what these people do for a living. Do ANY of them have actual jobs? Other than the ones who are PAID to put on these damned fool "demonstrations," that is. (One News Page)

Dead Broke to $100 Million!

Hillary and Bill claimed that, when they left the White House, they were “dead broke.” Yeah, with a $200,000 q year salary for 8 years and NO expenses, they're "dead broke." Yet, in a mere 16 years , these two, who were UNEMPLOYED during that 16 years (except for Hillary’s failed stint as Sec. Of State), are now worth $100 million dollars! How is that POSSIBLE? Overpriced speeches before groups of the very people she had to deal with as Sec. Of State. Which amounted to BRIBES, in the millions of dollars over a short time. They were selling “favors” in her then current job, and “futures” when she becomes president (she hopes). Plus paying NOTHING for many flights on other people’s airplanes. More than once, she or Bill traveled on the private plane of a “potentate” who hoped for preferred treatment, in the future. That saved many millions of dollars in travel costs—which they could apply to other things. Money is frangible. If you don’t have to spend it on things you’d normally spend it on, it’s like “getting paid” that much. (Just common sense)

Calif. Gun Laws Don't Work

They have failed miserably. Just look at one city: Sacramento cops are confiscating an average of one new gun every 6 hours, and just about all of them are ILLEGAL. They’re confiscating more guns every year, which means their laws against felons being able to get their guns are totally INEFFECTIVE. In spite of all their laws, gun sales to felons continue apace, increasing every year. The cops attribute the increase in confiscations of guns to “better police work.” More likely, it is due to more guns being sold out of some crook’s car trunk in a back alley somewhere, to another crook. Crooks don’t obey laws. That’s why we call them crooks. They’re also known as “lawbreakers.” We need laws that add significant time to their convictions for other crimes if they use a gun, and a PROHIBITION on cops or prosecutors “waiving” those “gun crime law charges” that do exist, to get convictions in other crimes, as they often do, now. That’s just laziness on the part of the cops. (Sacramento Bee)

Cops: "We Got Enough!"

The cops say they have enough evidence to put Hillary, Bill, Huma, and Weiner behind bars for the foreseeable future. They say they knew Wiener was trying to seduce underage girls as far back as 2011, and did nothing. Also, they are involved with a convicted pedophile who has a "child sex haven" island, and have made many trips there. Hillary six times, Bill 20 times. I'm waiting with "bated breath" to see what they do with this evidence. Will they "charge in" and arrest them? Will there be a "show trial" where all the gory details are aired? Will we see some "perp walks" starring Hillary and Bill, and the others? I don't know, now that the election is over and she is no longer "the anointed one." Maybe she IS "above the law." We will see, as time goes on. If she is allowed to "walk away," we will know.(American Patriot Daily)

Blaming the Victim

As usual, anti-gun fools blame the legal gun owners for those who get their guns ILLEGALLY. In Britain, they say legal gun owners need to be more careful so as to keep guns out of the hands of jihadists and other fools. That’s the kind of TWISTED REASONING anti-gun fools use. It’s not the fault of the legal owners that their guns get stolen, it’s the fault of the cops and government agents who don’t do a good enough job of preventing it. I guess they’re too busy trying to keep law-abiding people from getting guns, to worry about how ILLEGAL gun-sellers get their inventory. So naturally, they blame the victim: the legal owners, who never even SEE their guns before the crooks intercept them. (Telegraph of London)

Permanent Election

It seems almost as if we’re ALWAYS “in an election cycle” We have to suffer politicians calling each other names, all the time. Every four years we have a presidential election. Candidates are vying for that “prize” for more than two years prior to that. Every TWO years, we have an election for lesser offices, and one of them always falls right in the middle of the presidential election cycle which just adds to the din. The minute the presidential election is over, those seeking lesser offices start running their damned ads, and they keep running them, right up to their own election. As soon as that’s over, the campaigning for the NEXT election begins. They’ve already started up for the 2018 elections! I’m getting damned tired of listening to the politicians LYING about one another all the time. Something needs to be done to LIMIT political campaigning so campaigning is not going on, ALL the time. Another thing that bothers me; The fact tht politicians raise, and spend $MILLIONS of dollars to get a job that earns them at most, $200,000! There are a lot of gullible Americans out there willing to send them money, and they take full advantage of it. I have NEVER sent a DIME to a politician to help him/her get elected, and I never will. There are enough fools out there to keep their coffers filled. (Just common sense)

Freeloaders March

They call it a "demonstration," but really, all it is, is "the march of the freeloaders," who hate it that Trump has been elected president, in spite of all Hillary's dirty tricks. All they want is a continuation of the freebies they're all getting now, and they're afraid Trump is going to END the "gravy train" they've become used to. So much so, they now consider it their DUE. I'd be willing to bet money that MOST of them have no jobs, and are on some kind of welfare. Which is why they have the TIME to be "on the street," marching, and damaging other people's property. Those that DO have jobs are being paid to do exactly what they're doing (probably by Democrats or supporters of Democrats): marching, damaging other people's property, and creating havoc as "sour grapes" that the American workers rejected Hillary, and all that she stands for. Welfare, more freebies, and the ability to live without working, at someone else's expense. That's socialism: "FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED," making NEED a DEMAND on the earnings of those who still WORK for a living. That, other than amassing wealth for herself, is what Hillary is about, and the working people of America want no part of it, and the freeloaders hate that. (International Business Times)

"Murderers Ignore Gun Laws"

No kidding! They needed a “study” to discover that? Damn! A Texas radio station, ABC 13, sent a questionnaire to all gun murderers asking this: “How did you get your gun? What did you pay?, and “How often, if ever, did you go through a background check?" 90% got it illegally. 90% were ineligible to have a gun, due to past crimes. And 100% carried concealed despite not having a CCW Permit. Surprise, surprise! They violated the law when they set out to MURDER someone! It’s amazing! They found that these murderers had no intention of following the law! Isn’t that what criminals DO? It amazes me how STUPID some of the “studies” people do are! What did they expect from a murderer! That he followed the law while getting his gun? (America’s First Freedom)

"Huge Gun Violence Problem"

England has a “huge gun violence problem.” WTF? They have almost total “gun control!” How is that even possible? What? Do you mean some people don’t obey their draconian gun laws? What a surprise! They’re even afraid there is a connection between armed gangs and Islamic terrorists! Apparently, there’s a lively illegal gun sales business in England, in SPITE of all their laws. Whatta surprise! They found that fully HALF the terror plots in England involved terrorists trying to buy guns, with which to kill people who won’t “convert” to their phony “religion.” “Counter terrorism officers think that, since England is surrounded by water, that gives the ‘authorities’ an advantage in controlling the entry of guns into the UK.” Really? How has that worked, so far? (BBC News)

Made the Right Decision

Well, it wasn’t a landslide, but it was a significant victory, with Trump far enough ahead that Hillary’s election fraud efforts were to no avail. I guess I could be gloating right now, but actually, I’m heaving a sigh of relief that we wouldn’t be saddled with a SOCIALIST as president, one who would work HARD to take away our right to be armed in self defense against all the ILLEGALLY armed criminals who seem to always get their guns, no matter what the laws are. It’s like the feeling you get when somebody takes a shot at you and misses, just barely. Now Trump just has to keep his promises and we will regain our eminence in the world. The Islamic terrorists, under whatever name they operate, will now know it isn’t going to be easy for them any more, that we will now be really fighting them, not PRETENDING to. The flow of illegal aliens will, if not stop, slow down, as will the flow of Islamic terrorists posing as “refugees.” People will know that, if they “prod us,” they WILL “answer for it.” Iran and Russia will no longer have their planes “buzz” out ships for fear of being shot down. Socialism will “take a back seat” to the free market and we will prosper again. More jobs will open up, and the cost of health insurance WILL go down, this time. Many good things will happen. (Just common sense)

"Men With Guns"

How long can Nicholas Meduro remain in power in Venezuela after 80% of the citizens signaled they wanted him out? Quite a while, I guess, as long as he continues to have the loyalty of “men with guns.” Government guns, that is. No one else is supposed to have any, since the government made private gun ownership a crime. This shows you what will happen if there were no legal guns in a country, except those in the hands of cops and government agents (except for illegal guns, of course). Now they’re killing cops for their guns! The “will of the people” is IGNORED. What would happen if Venezuela had the equivalent of the Second Amendment, you ask? He wouldn’t be around for long, and that’s what OUR politicians fear. That’s why they try so hard to DISARM us as they work HARD to take away one right after another, and take more power over us, while making us pay for it. They know the only thing that keeps them from taking COMPLETE power is the fact that so many people have LEGAL guns. So they want to put a stop to that, as quickly as they can. And failing that, they want to make the guns we do have USELESS. (Gun Watch)

"It's Not A Right!"

That’s what they say in England about gun ownership. They say it’s a “privilege.” Which means it can be given or taken away by the politicians. Of course, they don’t have a Second Amendment in England, so they know NOTHING about a human right to self defense, and to own and use the means to it, a gun. They say “the NRA is always coming up with new ways to be nasty,” completely ignoring the fact that the NRA is protecting a right GUARANTEED by the Constitution, which is the BASIS for all our laws. Since they don’t have such a thing as the Second Amendment, created by wiser men than they, before they were even born, they think they know more than people who simply are DETERMINED to maintain the constitutional RIGHT to defend themselves with whatever tool is necessary—in this case, a gun. Back when there were no guns, that right would involve the right to carry a sword, in order to defend oneself. We fought a war for independence from these people because of their ignorance of human nature, so let’s not allow them to tell us what is, and is NOT a “right.” (The Guardian of London)

Fixing An Election

There are many ways to fix an election, and the Democrats know them all. They INVENTED most of them. One way is to supply the polling places with rigged machines, that will take GOP votes and make them into Democrat votes. Many of them (maybe ALL of them) supplied by a George Soros-connected company. ALL such vote changes benefit the DEMOCRATS—which should tell you something if you are, in any way, intelligent. But even when found, election officials “poo-poo” any thought of vote fraud, and keep the machines in service. They say it is simply bad calibration of THAT machine. I think it is instructive to note that the “election officials” are MOSTLY Democrats. Another way is for career politicians friendly to a candidate to manipulate things to CREATE more votes for one specific candidate. Terry McAuliffe, who was Hillary’s campaign manager in 2008, then DNC Chairman, now governor of Virginia, PARDONED 60,000 FELONS, returning their voting rights to them, just in time for them to vote Democrat, in appreciation, Republicans did not pardon them. He wanted to pardon 200,000, but the courts stopped that.

So he used his “signature machine” to sign pardons as fast as he could get the paper through the machine, and succeeded in pardoning 60,000, which could be enough to “swing an election” in the direction he desires. Obama has released another few thousand felons to vote in this election. Another way is to allow ILLEGAL aliens in country to vote, and guess who THEY vote for: Hillary, and other Democrats, of course! Another way is to vote, using the names on tombstones in a cemetery. A method the Democrats have been using for years. Voting many times in different districts is another scam, since in most places, picture ID is NOT REQUIRED to vote. The Democrats have seen to that. Stuffing ballot boxes is another, and one KNOWN to be used in many elections. Suffice it to say the Democrats know most ways to rig an election. They INVENTED most of them, which is why they win so many elections. But I think they will still be defeated this time, by the sheer NUMBERS of Republican voters that “come out of the woodwork” and vote Republican. They can usually only change the result in elections that are close. This one is not going to be close, and they’re going to LOSE, and lose BIG! I just hope I'm right. If not, the American people will lose, and lose big! (Just common sense)

Criminals for Gun Control

Did you know that one of the most powerful “anti-gun politicians” is barred, himself, from carrying or owning a gun due to past crimes? And he reports DIRECTLY to the president on his work. It’s a known fact that some of the hottest proponents of “gun control” are criminals, because what PASSES for “gun control” only benefits the criminal? Criminals LOVE gun control, because it makes their jobs easier, knowing their victims most likely won’t be armed, and able to kill THEM instead of being intimidated by THEIR guns. But it’s strange to me that a TOP “gun control” proponent is, himself, a criminal, who is not allowed to have a gun. This is the kind of anomaly that makes people wonder about government efforts to DISARM the populace, KNOWING it can only benefit criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists, who are coming here by the hundreds of thousands, on OUR dime, thanks to Obama. (The War on Guns)

"Get Around the Constitution"

They can’t just BAN guns. So they do everything they can to first, make guns UNUSABLE, and then they do everything they can to make gun use a “hardship” by passing laws to make gun makers and sellers liable for damages in every case where a gun they made or sold was used to commit a crime—like they are really responsible for MISUSE of the guns they’ve sold, LEGALLY, following all the stupid “gun laws.” Many of their “gun laws” work to make it impossible to get a LEGAL gun into action fast enough to defend against an ILLEGAL gun in the hands of a “bad guy,” which gets honest, law-abiding people KILLED. Others only give authorities a list of LEGAL gun owners, completely IGNORING the fact that the MAJORITY of crimes are committed by people with ILLEGAL guns. They haven’t figured out a law yet that can do ANYTHING about “gun violence,” but they keep making them, anyway, DISARMING honest people, while criminals still get their guns, and there is NO RECORD of who has an ILLEGAL gun, anywhere. Meanwhile, half of the ”anti-gun organizations” who support Hillary Clinton only exist on paper as a name, and use of a fax machine probably that can be found in Mike Bloomberg’s office. (America’s First Freedom)

Ia A Revolution Coming?

The last time the government tried to take away our guns, it started a revolution that created a nation, BASED on freedom for the INDIVIDUAL, not for the government, and in which the right to be armed for self defense was enshrined in our founding documents. The Founders knew that if we gave up that right, we would soon be enslaved. Since then, even before the ink dried on that founding document, politicians have been trying mightily (unsuccessfully, I might add) to “get around” that founding document and “get rid of our guns.” Again, unsuccessfully. They just can’t understand why, after so many years trying, they haven’t been able to do it. It doesn’t occur to them that the MAJORITY of Americans are AGAINST it. They try every way they can to “get around” the Constitution, and mostly concentrate on making the legal guns out there USELESS by forcing gun owners to “safely store” their guns in such a way they can’t be gotten into action fast enough to oppose a criminal bearing an ILLEGAL gun. They create “gun-free zones” that criminals IGNORE, bringing their guns there anyway, SEEKING OUT gun-free zones in which to do their dirty work, being pretty sure that gullible, law-abiding people will not be armed and able to stop them.

People fear that the politicians, if Hillary is elected, will finally succeed, and they’re ready to fight. Some of them have formed “militias” and are HEAVILY armed. They will probably lose, but they WILL fight, and they will be joined by others. Maybe they will even win. The “authorities” have shown that they are “stopped cold” by a display of armed people resolute in their desire to stop their atrocities. Many are just not prepared to fire upon other Americans. I don’t want to see another revolution in this country, mostly because we don’t know what kind of government we’ll get after it’s over, and the Constitution invalidated (not even to mention the unnecessary bloodshed). I’m too old and “broken down” to participate, anyway. But I see one coming, and I wish it wouldn’t happen—at least, in my lifetime or that of my progeny. (NY Times)

Teaching Our Kids

This is the kind of thing they teach our kids in schools these days. The question, “Do guns have a place in our society today?” gives you an idea how IGNORANT are the people deciding on the curriculum. Guns DO “have a place in our society!” LEGAL guns, to oppose all the ILLEGAL guns that are already out there in the hands of the “bad guys.” If (legal) guns were removed from society (even if that were possible), those with ILLEGAL guns would simply “take over.” And there would be no way to stop them, except maybe with more ILLEGAL guns in the hands of honest people who were forced to BECOME criminals, in order to to defend themselves. This very question reveals the kind of BONEHEADS who are deciding what to teach our impressionable kids, who haven’t been on this Earth long enough to know better. (University News)

"It Doesn't Happen!"

That’s what the anti-gun fools tell us. They desperately want us to believe that defensive use of guns doesn’t happen. That the only thing guns are used for is to create “gun violence,” or for kids to kill themselves, or others, through ignorance. But then a respected organization like National Academy of Sciences” (NAS) comes out with the fact that there are 500,000 to 3 MILLION defensive uses of guns, in SPITE of the restrictive gun laws all over the country. The report also noted that mass shootings are rare in the United States, even though the way they’re hyped when they DO happen makes it seem otherwise—which plays right into the hands of those who want to DISARM all honest, law-abiding people, leaving the field wide open for the criminals, crazies, and even Islamic terrorists (who are coming by the hundreds of thousands, at Obama’s invitation, and taxpayer expense), who get their guns ILLEGALLY. They found, to Obama’s and the other anti-gun fools’ horror, gun use against crime was “commonplace” in the United States, contrary to the claims of the gun-grabbers. (Breitbart)

The Foulest Stench of All

Many people don’t like Lou Dobbs, for the same reasons they don’t like Donald Trump. He is not “business as usual,” and will shake up the garbage pit in DC like nobody—not even Ronald Reagan ever did. I sure hope Dobbs is right, and Trump is the leader we desperately need, at a time when we need it the most. Trump has stood up and said what needs to be said, and spent millions, maybe even BILLIONS of his own money to be able to take a pay cut, so he can do something about the “garbage heap” in DC, knowing that for the next four years, at least, he will not be able to lead his private business to new wealth. That will have to be left up to his children. Hillary certainly isn’t going to do it, she’ll only make it worse. She’s one of the biggest garbage dumpers in DC!

She is the cause of many of our worst problems. He has spent his lifetime amassing a huge fortune. If he was as stupid as the Democrats paint him, he couldn’t have done that.. Yes, he did get a “head start.” But he has significantly INCREASED his fortune from where he started. The Democrats have nothing REAL to go against him, so all they can do is come up with a bunch of women willing to accuse him of sexual misconduct (with no proof) and insults. Trump is a “street fighter.” He doesn’t accept their insults the same way other politicians do. He fights back. And that’s the kind of leader we desperately need, right now. Lou Dobbs lays it out in this video. There appears to be a problem with this URL. The first time you try in, you might get a "not permitted" notice. Close that tab after copying the URL and try it in a new tab. Off course, you can also search Fox Business/Lou Dobbs for it, if necessary. (Fox Business/Lou Dobbs)

Bundys Not Guilty

The feds blew it, big time, in the Bundy case. They tried to charge and imprison Cliven Bundy’s son and others for their “armed standoff” over grazing rights in Oregon, and they LOST, big! Now they’re saying they “fear” other such “uprisings” because of the verdict. Maybe they’re right. But such “uprisings” are a basic human RIGHT. Maybe not ARMED uprisings (yet), but its only the liberals whose “uprisings” they CALL “demonstrations,” even when they contain violence, who get away with it, without them “fearing” other “uprisings” (demonstrations). They always make it sound like a catastrophe when they lose, don’t they? They did keep the old man in prison, in spite of this verdict. His “charges” are a different thing, and they intend to keep him in prison if they can. I notice the feds just HAD to do something to prove their “eminence.” When the lawyer’s argument with the judge about releasing the prisoners got a bit loud, a bunch of federal marshals jumped her and tased her—for which they all should be arrested for flagrant assault under cover of law enforcement. (Freedom’s Phoenix)

"More Guns Won't Help"

That’s according to a “Johns Hopkins/ BLOOMBERG (of course) “study.” They also concluded that mass shootings NEVER occur in “gun-free zones,” which we all know is a LIE. ALL mass shootings have happened in “gun-free zones!” Potential mass shooters SEEK OUT “gun-free zones” because they can be pretty sure there won’t be any law-abiding people there with their own guns. KNOWN mass shooters, when questioned, SAY they do! The anti-gun fools must really think Americans are STUPID! The LIES they tell are easily disproved, but they tell them, anyway, and those who ARE gullible believe them. It’s not surprising that a “survey” by BLOOMBERG people have such “findings.” That’s what the gun-grabbers DO. Lie to you, because there AREN’T any real figures to back them up. They say that “best evidence doesn’t support our contention that getting rid of no-gun zones would reduce gun crime, but “best evidence” DOES support our claims. (The Hub)

Old Man With Gun

Two ILLEGALLY armed thugs thought robbing this 73-year-old man would be easy. How much trouble could an “old geezer” be to a couple of young, ARMED hoodlums? Quite a bit, as it turns out. They’re both dead, having been shot to death by that “old geezer” after they put a gun to his head and demanded his truck. One of the thugs’ guns was found to be stolen (surprise, surprise!). The killings were ruled “justifiable homicide.” And no charges will be filed against this “old geezer.” (I can use that term, because I’m an “old geezer,” myself). It’s interesting to note that one of the dead thugs was from Ferguson, MO. I guess he didn’t learn anything from Michael Brown’s death. The “old geezer: said he would rather have done anything besides killing those two young men. He’s “devastated” over it. He’s described as a “very nice man” by his neighbors. One who uses his snow blower to clear a neighbor’s porch, and “takes care of” a blind man in the neighborhood. (Daily Wire)

Worse Than They Thought?

Liberals and other gun-grabbers tell us there are about 300 million guns in the U. S., and they’re WRONG, as usual, mostly due to lack of proper research, of course. There are NOT 300 million, there are at least 412 million, and maybe up to 600 million. Boy! That must make Sen. Feinstein and Gabby Giffords cringe! And most of those guns are ILLEGALLY-owned, which are usually the only ones used to do “gun violence” while all their “laws” only apply to LEGAL gun owners, who are not the problem, at all. As usual, their numbers are faulty. Sometimes because of faulty research, but other times due to them LYING to “buttress” their figures to make us think “guns are taking over.” Their entire narrative is based on the false premise that, if they can “get rid of guns,” that will also get rid of CRIME. And that all they have to do is make a LAW that LAWBREAKERS will obey. (Weapons Man)

Australia Repeats Their Failure

They instituted a “MANDATORY” gun-buyback program a few years ago, after a particularly disturbing mass shooting. It didn’t work. So now they’re going to offer “amnesty” for those who didn’t obey the first law, who give up their guns. “’There is little evidence to suggest that (the Australian mandatory gun-buyback program) had any significant effects on firearm homicides,’ University of Melbourne researchers Wang-Sheng Lee and Sandy Suardi wrote in 2008. ‘Although gun buybacks appear to be a logical and sensible policy that helps to placate the public’s fears, the evidence so far suggests that in the Australian context, the high expenditure incurred to fund the 1996 gun buyback has not translated into any tangible reductions in terms of firearm deaths,’ they added.” In other words, it didn’t work. Today, they ADMIT that there are 260,000 ILLEGAL guns in Australia, and are going to offer amnesty to anyone who will turn in their guns. Like a CRIMINAL will “turn in his guns,” just because they “offer amnesty.” What FOOLS these anti-gun idiots be! (Truth About Guns)

Hillary In Sex Trafficking?

The NYPD just RAIDED Hillary’s private compound and confiscated her and Huma’s cell phones and computers because they had found evidence of their involvement in a sex trafficking ring with their friend, Jeffery Epstein. This is not just a sex ring, it’s a sex and child enslavement ring! Is there no depth to how LOW Democrats can sink? Of course, I didn’t hear much about it in the liberal media, and I usually keep my ear pretty close to the ground (and that’s hard for an “old duffer” like me). I think this is just the “tip of the iceberg.” (Compatriot News)

Flawed Thinking

It should be easy to dissuade the anti-gun fools from their intended path because their entire movement is based on not one, but MANY flaws in their thinking. We should be able to show them these flaws to get them to abandon their efforts to take guns away from honest, law-abiding people, leaving them DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there, in the hands of those who will only use them to victimize them. But that isn’t possible, because they just aren’t smart enough, and they firmly IGNORE all our efforts to reason with them. Their first faulty thinking involves disarming law-abiding people who AREN’T the problem, while ignoring the “bad guys” who ARE. That gets people killed. Next is their firm opinion that all they have to do is get rid of all the guns and that will stop the “bad guys” from committing their crimes, including murder and MASS murder. Even if that were possible (which it isn’t), crime would continue, using other weapons, or even their bare hands. Then comes their firm conviction that all they have to do is make a LAW against gun ownership, and CRIMINALS, who obey NO laws, will somehow obey it, and get rid of their illegal guns. That’s just a pipe-dream. There are many more examples of their ignorance, but I just don’t have room here to list them all. (Just common sense)

Spendthrift Obama

Obama let it be known that he wanted to play a round of golf with Tiger Woods. I guess he really likes men who cheat on their wives and have suffered for it. So he gets his wish, and spends $3.6 MILLION of OUR money to do it. Another example of how he spends our money like water for his own enjoyment, not for government business. You say he needs all that security and communications gear to be with him at all times? You’d think he’d take that into account. But he doesn’t care. He (and his wife) is (are) “on the gravy train” and they’re going to play it for all it’s worth, as long as they can. We should have seen this in him when he TRIPLED the national debt, spending more money than ALL previous presidents, PUT TOGETHER. (Daily Caller)

Fart Heard "Round the World"

A patient In a Japanese hospital farted during her surgery, and the gas expelled started a fire that burnt her severely. I know I probably shouldn’t laugh because of the seriousness of the situation, but I can’t help it. I guess it’s a good thing Hillary isn’t in a hospital operating room as she gives her amazingly stupid “mouth farts” to her people. Or maybe…. Naw…. We don’t want to be mean, even if she is VERY mean in the things of which she falsely accuses Trump. Trump was “endorsed” by David Duke, formerly of the Klan, and she played that for all it was worth (nothing). But she omitted the fact that Trump refused to accept the “endorsement.” Like it showed Trump was also a bigot, just like her. (NY Daily News)

"It Ain't Cuttin' It!"

Obama has ADMITTED that Obamacare ain’t cuttin’ it. So now he’s offering an “alternative program” they can get if they want. What that “alternative program” is, is “single-payer (government) system.” The government bureaucrats, of course, would CONTROL what is, and is not covered, not your doctor, and not you. It’s what he wanted, all along, but he knew he had to give you something else that you’re guaranteed not to be able to afford, so you’ll be quick to “jump for it” when offered the alternative to the other program you’re REQUIRED to buy, whether or not it costs TWICE as much as what you had before, for less coverage, since he forced insurance companies to cancel you. Your deductibles are now in the thousands of dollars, making the “insurance” WORTHLESS. It’s massive CON, and we (not me) fell for it. (Freedom’s Phoenix)

Another Obama Lie

He says he didn’t know Hillary was using a private e-mail system, but that’s an out-and-out LIE (among all the others). Anybody receiving an e-mail from anybody can easily tell what service he/he is using. And if Hillary was using a state-provided e-mail service, it would have a suffix like “state.gov.” Hers did NOT. So Obama would definitely have known she was not using an authorized service, any time he got one from her, which he did, on a regular basis. He even used a phony name with which to communicate with her, to maintain "viable deniability," which proves his lie. This is the typical kind of lie Obama tells, hoping to fool the nation. But anybody who uses e-mail will know that, so he got caught. But he doesn’t care. He figures he can vehemently deny the lie, and we’ll have to believe it. It is the narrative, and he figures we will have to accept it. (Politico)

It's All the Same

They “dress it up” with different names, but they all mean the same thing: collectivism. The Democrats (liberals) themselves named it: “You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.” They call it “progressivism,” “communism,” “Fascism,” “Democratic socialism.” National Socialism (Naziism), and so many other names, I don’t know them all, and don’t have room here to list them. But it’s ALL “collectivism,” which is BASED on a simple saying: “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED.” Making NEED a DEMAND on the earnings of those ABLE to earn their own way by those who don’t, for one reason or the other, mostly laziness. It’s a philosophy that sounds good to young people who haven’t been on this Earth long enough to know better, but who still have the right to vote. Of course, they’ve been fed socialist principles all their lives in government-run schools, right up to, and including those overpriced colleges, at which MOST of their professors are socialist believers, and teach them it’s the “way to go.” (Just common sense)

"Suicide Yes, Chemo No!"

That’s what this woman’s insurance company is telling her. That’s what you get when you put your life in the hands of a bureaucrat—the death penalty. California now has an “assisted suicide law,” and her insurance company will pay for her to kill herself. But they won’t pay for the chemo that MIGHT keep her alive! Initially, they were going to pay for the chemo, but right after California passed the assisted suicide law, they changed their minds and refused to cover it. Assisted suicide laws create an opportunity for insurance companies to “get rid of” terminally ill patients, so they do. Patients fighting to stay alive are the victims here. It’s cheaper for the insurance companies to just “kill them off,” so that’s what they do, Now they’re preparing to pass a NATIONAL assisted suicide law! And to hell with all the people it KILLS! (Washington Times)

Keeping A Promise

Obama is known for not keeping his promises. He promised that Obamacare would REDUCE premiums by 25%. But it actually DOUBLED and TRIPLED them, while adding thousand dollar deductibles, making the insurance WORTHLESS. He promised that, if you liked your doctor or your hospital, you could keep them, which predictably proved to be another LIE. Now he’s promising that those premiums WILL DOUBLE , or more. That’s a promise he can keep. But fear not. There will be “government assistance” *subsidies that others will pay for) in paying them. All you have to do is go, hat in hand, to the nearest faceless, nameless bureaucrat and BEG for help. (Patriot Post)

Creating A Crime Wave

It’s becoming more and more clear that Obama wants to do as much DAMAGE to this country as he can, as long as he can. So he’s releasing as many criminals from prison on specious reasons, as he can. Earlier this month he released 102 criminals, many of them with gun convictions. Then just the other day he released another 98 , and 19.8% of them had gun convictions. This action GUARANTEES a significant rise in the crime rate, especially the GUN crime rate, as those “career criminals” continue to ply their trade. Couple that with his importing hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists, who have PROMISED to kill as many Americans as they can if they don’t “convert” to their phony “religion,” disguised as ”refugees, and a new “crime wave” is guaranteed. Of course, as a former president, he will live behind a wall with his own ARMED security, provided by the government, so he isn’t worried about being victimized. Besides: most of them are his friends, or just grateful to him for their freedom to victimize us some more, (Bearing Arms)

No Guns In Restaurants

The usually short-sighted anti-gun fools are asking, “Why would you need a gun in a restaurant?” Why, indeed? Maybe they should ask the woman in Texas who had to leave her legally-carried gun in the car because the restaurant she was going to with her parents was a “gun-free zone,” and had to watch while some fool came in and shot up the restaurant and KILLED her parents. Or the employees of a Waffle House that was recently held up at gunpoint. Or he people in many other restaurants (like Panera Bread, a “soup and sandwich chain that is a “gun-free zone”) Yes, why would you need a gun in a restaurant? For the same reason you need one anywhere else. To repulse a would-be shooter who doesn’t care the restaurant is a “gun-free zone.” People who want to rob restaurants or just “shoot them up” don’t OBEY laws, or especially a “corporate rule.” In fact, they SEARCH OUT such places because they figure they won’t meet a “concealed carrier” who will thwart their plane by killing him. (WTVM 9)

Not For Children

Shannon Watts, boss of “Moms For No Guns (or some such),” one of the best known anti-gun fool outfit scoffs at the idea of teaching children gun safety. She says, “We teach gun safety to ADULTS.” Of course, this discounts entirely the FACT that if children KNEW something about guns (how dangerous they are, that they’re not playthings, and they can KILL you), they might be less likely to play with the guns in their home and maybe kill themselves or somebody else. The fact is, they KNOW where the guns are, no matter how hard we try to hide them. I certainly did when I was a child, and I predictably got in trouble because of it, though fortunately I didn’t kill myself, or anybody else. Though my dad had to control himself to keep from killing ME for getting into it. As usual, her sights are squarely on the GUN, and how to take away our right to self-defense and to own and carry the means to that, a gun. She is very short-sighted, as are ALL anti-gun fools. (ShannonWatts/Twitter)