Stupid Reasoning

Gun grabbers say that if we could just do more research on guns, there'd be “no more murders.” As IF! That's like their damned fool notion that making a LAW against honest people carrying guns will keep CRIMINALS from carrying them. It's stupid. But you can't budge them in their beliefs. They're “set in stone (like their minds).” They actually think they can make LAWS that will “eliminate guns forever!” They IGNORE all the cases of known felons who have guns, anyway, and who bring them into “gun-free zones,” in spite of the laws and “rules” that say, “no guns here!” “Researchers” who DO some “research” on the subject rely mostly on “facts” accumulated by a known anti-gun fool outfit whose only interest is making it harder for honest people to have guns for self defense, The “Gun Violence Archive.” They say the questions they ask in their “research” are, “Can we make guns safer or more child-proof?” and “What are the most effective ways to keep guns out of kids' hands?” NEVER on how to TEACH kids about guns and the fact that they're NOT toys and are dangerous, so they won't be as inclined to “play” with them, which is taught by the “hated” NRA. They IGNORE these efforts on the part of the NRA and look only at their efforts to preserve our constitutional right to own and use guns for self defense, efforts which they hate. (Las Vegas Sun)

The "Terrifying Rate!"

This is the newspaper headline: “The terrifying rate at which children are killing themselves dead.” Then we take a look at the rate. By their own figures, it's 0.0003%. Doesn't seem so “terrifying,” does it? Except to the VICTIMS. They CLAIM it happens about “once a day.” The story linked below tells the story of a child who killed himself with a gun his grandmother hid under her bed. Obviously, she never heard of the “gun safety classes” run by the NRA. She probably hates the NRA, based on what she's been told by the anti-gun fools. But that LACK of information about proper “gun safety” and handling is what's responsible for this child's death. If the anti-gun fools would stop “demonizing” the NRA and push its efforts to teach people about gun safety, maybe we could further reduce such deaths, as more and more people use proper gun-handling methods, instead of “hiding them under the bed.” Children always know exactly where guns are hidden, even if they don't understand them. I know I did when I was a youngster, though I did know how dangerous they could be and mostly stayed away from them, and managed not to kill myself, or anybody else. (NY Post)

Hysterical Stupidity

That's the only way I can describe what the anti-gun fools swear is going to happen. They think Trump supporters are going to “shoot up” polling places to get Trump elected—or something like that. They completely ignore such things as the Black Panthers” dressing up in “cop-like” uniforms, carrying “billy clubs,” and standing outside polling places to intimidate voters in 2012. They SAY they're just “providing security.” Security for WHOM? Never mind that it is a proven fact that DEMOCRAT activists are the ones who have brought violence to Trump rallies. If there is any shooting at polling places on election day, it is going to be the DEMOCRATS who are responsible, although they will TRY to blame Trump for it. Fact is, mass shootings can, and HAVE, occurred ANYWHERE lots of people gather. Not just polling places. The “common denominator” is that most mass shootings happen in “gun-free zones.” Mass shooters TARGET such places, because they figure they can kill more people before somebody with a gun arrives and kills them. (Gun-Free Zone)

More Guns In Chicago

More ILLEGAL guns. Despite some of the tightest “gun laws” in the nation, Chicago has more guns on the street than in NYC and Los Angeles, COMBINED. And most of them come from right outside Chicago in Lyons, IL, and are traceable to ONE gun dealer. They did something about that, with that gun dealer's cooperation, and therefore reduced the number of guns, somewhat. They also found that most shootings happened after altercations at certain bars. So they did something about that, too. And lowered the number some more, but both accounted for just a small number of the guns out there. They said that many “gun sales” were done at “gun shows” where unlicensed individuals (not necessarily holders of tables, but who were just “there”) buying and selling guns illegally. Why they specifically mentioned gun shows is in question, since that kind of activity goes on all the time, all over the city, and outside it. Another factor in “reducing gun violence” is INFORMATION. Not that put out by the anti-gun fools, REAL information that tells the REAL story, that gun violence is at its lowest ebb, since more people are buying guns for self defense. More and more burglars and “tough guys” who like to bully people with their ILLEGAL guns are getting killed and injured by LEGAL gun owners, which makes them more likely to go into other kinds of crime. (Wired)

"Clown Eruption"

Why all of a sudden do we see an “eruption” of “creepy clowns,” just weeks before the presidential election? To take our attention off the election issues, of course! Hillary is afraid to answer most of the questions she is bound to be facing in the coming weeks, even with the liberal media firmly in her pocket. So she needs the public to be obsessing over something else. Here come the “creepy clowns!” To take up all the extra news space and keep us occupied with something other than her CRIMES. You think I'm “full of it?” Why did it happen NOW? Just weeks before the election? Why not AFTER the election? Or any other time? The answer is simple: any other time wouldn't work to Hillary's advantage. She wants most of the media's attention to be taken up by the UNSUPPORTED allegations of sexual misconduct on the part of her opponent, AND the “creepy clowns,” so they won't have time to ask her about her crimes. (People)

Obamacare Is A Success!

It has done exactly what it was designed to do: damage this country. That's what Obama wants to do, and he has proven it by his every action AND what he says. He thinks we should NOT be the “leader” in the world, and he has done everything in his power to destroy that supremacy. Obamacare is a major part of it. Instead of reducing our costs, as he promised, it sent them SKYROCKETING, while adding multi-thousand dollar deductibles, the combination making their insurance USELESS, while at the same time making it MANDATORY. Of course, he KNEW America would rebel against it, so he is FORCING us to accept it. If it was really a good thing, why the HELL make it MANDATORY? This abortion has so screwed up the medical profession, it CAN'T LAST, and that has also been proved. Which is why now is the time for him to offer his “single-payer” system as an alternate, which was the plan, all along. He had to make us hate the original so he could CON us into the other. (Just common sense)

Bottom Feeder Politics

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that the forces of a woman who spent millions to defend the sexual proclivities of her own husband, even to the extent of coining the term, “bimbo eruptions” should now be “crying crocodile tears” about similar stories about her opponent, just weeks before the presidential election. That's how Democrats operate: using “bottom-feeder” tactics to defeat their opponents. Like Harry Reid's claim that Mitt Romney “didn't pay any taxes for ten years,” to election fraud to tilt an election in their favor. Reid had no proof of this (It was later proved false), and when challenged, he said, “I don't need proof! You need to ask Romney about it.” (Which was WRONG! When you make an accusation like that, in the “real world,” YOU have to prove it!) Bill Clinton is a KNOWN sexual abuser, who got FINED $800,000 plus dollars after LYING about it, lost his law license for five years (And what did he need it for? He was making a fortune in “bribes” for the “speeches” he was making after leaving office), and was disbarred. Yet Democrats are now “making a big thing” about UNSUPPORTED allegations of sexual abuse by Trump, just in time for the election. Surprise, surprise! Frankly, if the Democrats are “disturbed” about it, I reject it. I don't believe ANYTHING the Democrats say. (Just common sense)

Gabby Changed Her Mind

The other day, I wrote an item about Gabby Giffords (one of the most vocal “gun-grabbers” on the planet) thinking “not enough people were killed at Newtown,” so she's going to concentrate on the West Palm Beach shooting, where 49 were killed, and another 50 wounded. But she has now announced her intention to go to Newtown and help them make even more USELESS gun laws, hoping to capitalize on the deaths of many CHILDREN, though not as many as the number of people who died in W. Palm Beach. I guess she figures you gotta take advantage of what's happening, and the Newtown people are independently working toward the same ends as she is. So she decided her input could make their effort more powerful. So now she's pandering to them. (Hartford Courant)

Muslim Supremacy?

We're rapidly approaching it. Is there any other group that has had rules made prohibiting ANY words against it but Muslims?. In Kansas City, the School Board has adopted a rule that makes saying ANYTHING about Muslims that they don't like a punishable offense. Has such a rule EVER been made about Christians, or ANY other group? Is it constitutional? Not a chance. They don't have a powerful lobbying group, like the Muslims do. Not only that, Muslims have infiltrated the “ruling class” in America at a high level (6 Muslims on Obama's staff), and the effect is proliferating. It's getting to the point where simply telling the TRUTH about Muslims is a CRIME. If they end up winning the “war against terrorism,” that will be the reason. They will have been allowed to infiltrate us and begin to RUN things. Then we will be LOST. (Allen West Republic)

That's Jist Orful!

The guy who (allegedly) shot two cops in Boston before, himself, being killed, didn't have a license for the gun he used! That's jist orful! He actually violated the law when he set out to kill a few cops! I thought laws limiting gun ownership for felons and crazies stopped them from getting them. You mean they don't? That they're USELESS? Well, what do ya know!It's like I've been saying, all along. The laws the anti-gun fools keep making do NOTHING to “stem gun violence,” and only INCREASE it by disarming honest, law-abiding people, who aren't the problem, anyway. This is the second time in a couple of days this has happened. The guy who shot and killed two cops in Palm Springs didn't have a license to own a gun, either, since he was a felon. But he got one, anyway, in spite of the “gun laws. Fancy that! This in California, a state with some of the tightest gun laws anywhere outside of Chicago, the “murder capital” of the United States. Hmmmmmm....I wonder if the anti-gun fools will notice this. Doubtful; they're not smart enough. (Breitbart)

Out In the Open

Politicians and POLICE politicians usually try to hide their gun confiscation efforts. Now some of them actually have units DEDICATED to “gun confiscation,” and even have special squad cars MARKED “gun confiscation unit,” in spite of the fact that ANY kind of “gun confiscation” is ILLEGAL under the Constitution, which is the BASIS for ALL of our laws. If you don't know that, you need to take the college free course on the Constitution put on by Hillsdale College. It's an online course, and is completely FREE. In any case, the Huffington Post is now pushing STEALING guns, to destroy them. Although I'll bet many of those stealing them will not be destroying them, but will be using them to victimize honest people, who don't usually steal ANYTHING. (Huffington Post)

"50 Years Rigging Elections"

That's what Scott Foval, until recently the field director for “Americans United for Change,” a well known liberal organization, frankly ADMITTED that Democrats have been rigging elections for the last fifty years (I think it started much longer ago than that, just not in his memory). Yet the Democrats say “there IS no election fraud.” I guess the best defense is an offense. Democrats deny any election fraud to cover up their own election fraud. Election fraud is how John Kennedy beat Richard Nixon (in Nixon's first try). That's also how Obama won the White House, TWICE. It's also how Hillary is staying “neck-in-neck” with Trump in this election. Without the connivance of the Democrat Party and the liberal media, she'd be lagging by 50 points. Trump's crowds, compared to hers PROVES it. He fills stadiums. She's lucky to fill a small gymnasium in a schoolhouse. I personally WATCHED a Democrat operative walk into a polling place with a box full of false ballots and stuff them into the ballot box and vote them. And he didn't care if somebody saw him, because he knew the people charged with stopping such as him were Democrats and would look the other way, (Blabber Buzz)

Killing Pro-Gun Bills

Florida State Senator Miguel Diaz de la Portilla (D-Miami) supported many pro-gun bills—until a Boloomberg group offered him money to kill them. So he did. Portilla is an excellent example of how the Cubans have “taken over” in Miami after “running” from Castro. Now that's not necessarily a bad thing, but notice he is a Democrat, doing non-Democrat things—until liberal anti-gun fools offered him money to go against his principles. Which he did, willingly, and quickly. Politicians of Spanish decent are well known for their corruption, mostly in Mexico. But Cubans are good at it, too, apparently. And that's NOT racism, it's common sense, just looking at the facts. (Guns)

"The Science Is Settled"

I've always been suspicious any time somebody says “the science is settled” on ANYTHING (Particularly global warming (now known as “climate change” to keep looting the nation). But in this instance, it may be true. More people are killed by falling off ladders, falling down stairs, in cars, and by consuming household chemicals than they are by guns—and that includes justifiable shootings. So why don't the anti-gun fools go after ladders, stairways, cars, and household chemicals? Because they know banning such things is impossible. They claim guns are only good for shooting people, and they're right. But WHY they kill people is important. Most ILLEGAL guns out there are used to victimize innocent people. But others are used to DEFEND against the first group, and without them, we're at the mercy of ILLEGAL gun owners. Trying to ban ALL guns is the usual short-sighted action of the anti-gun fools, and they refuse to be deterred, or turned in a logical direction. So we have to keep fighting them, spending a lot of time and money that would not be necessary if they could see reason. (Joe Huffman)

They Gotta Be Stupid!

The Patriot Tribune ran a story that says, “50% of “millennials” would vote for a socialist government.” How stupid IS that? Maybe not stupid, just IGNORANT. Stupid people know the truth, but push the wrong ideas, anyway. Ignorant people are just suffering from a lack of information. Which they've “gained” by all those years in liberal-run schools (usually at a high price), being taught the LIE that socialism is the way to go, because it gives them all those delicious “free things.” They don't tell them that, as they grow older, they will be expected to PAY for those “freebies” given to others. Meanwhile, their lives will be CONTROLLED by the top liberals. The liberals systematically “took over” the universities and other schools, so as to be able to teach out impressionable children these LIES, so as to increase their CONTROL, at all levels. They charge them “big bucks” to go to college, which is a socialist conditioning system. Now they're telling us we have to PAY for that. They don't tell them that the “we” will be them after a while. All they tell them is about all the “freebies” they will get in a socialist nation, ignoring the fact that SOMEBODY has to pay for it, or it will not work. (Patriot Tribune)

Kardashian Wants Armed Security

After being robbed at gunpoint, Kim Kardashian, a very vocal anti-gun fool, now wants more armed security. Thus proving again, that an anti-gun fool is just somebody who has never been robbed at gunpoint. She lost (she says) $10 million dollars' worth of jewelry to an armed robber in a terrifying robbery. Now she wants people with GUNS guarding her “stash,” what's left of it. Of course, what the hell she was doing with that much jewelry around WITHOUT security is a question. It shows the lack of intelligence by anti-gun fools on security. I'd bet she STILL is against us “po' folks” being armed, though she wants to be protected, herself. Like most anti-gun fools. It's a “common theme” for anti-gun fools to be armed, themselves, or go around surrounded by armed men for protection, while denying the rest of us the same right. (Breitbart)

Twisting Words

Liberals are good at twisting words to suit themselves, as Justice Stephen Breyer showed again with his opinion, given on the Charlie Rose Show that the Second Amendment did not refer to an INDIVIDUAL right. That this is a liberal fantasy is well known, and he is just parroting it. But what makes it bad is that he is a Supreme Court Justice and his opinion can affect the rights of millions of citizens. The purpose of the Second Amendment is well known: it is to make sure INDIVIDUALS are armed if the government “calls them up” in defense of the country. A secondary purpose, spoken of many times by the Founders, is to “keep the government honest” by making sure the people are never disarmed. The first thing a dictator wannabe does is disarm the populace. Then he “kills off” all the dissidents. The Second Amendment was designed to prevent that from happening, and has worked well for years in doing just that. But, since among liberals are MANY “dictator wannabes,” they continuously try and “get around” the constitutional protection of the Second Amendment. We need to stay vigilant and never allow them to prevail. (America's First Freedom)

Equipment Failure

Sorry about yesterday. I was just getting ready to start posting when my computer was “taken over” by someone PRETENDING to be Microsoft, who, of course, wanted me to call a certain phone number, at which I suppose I would be asked for money to get my computer released. I couldn't get rid of the block. So I got rid of the computer, instead, and I've spent most of the day today getting the new one set up. It's already been tried again on this computer, but it came with malware killer software so I was able to clean it up.

Wrong Again And Again!

The pundits gave been uniformly wrong about Trump from the moment he announced his run for the presidency. All during the primaries they predicted his demise as a candidate. Time and time again they “reported” that he has “screwed up” and was going to drop out for one reason or the other. Meanwhile he continued to draw multi thousands of supporters to his rallies Then they “shot their bolt” with the usual accusations of sexual improprieties that they use in every election that they thought would get rid of him forever—and it didn't. Now they're saying (again) that his strongest supporters are “dumping him” in gross numbers. And again, they're wrong. As usual. I guess nobody has told him about all the people who are “dumping him.” It's hard to tell, with his crowds continuing to dwarf those drawn by Hillary. And he's raising hundreds of millions of dollars, while spending little. Meanwhile, Hillary and the gang are paying people to instigate violence at his rallies, so they can blame HIM for it. They're actually blowing up his headquarters, and blaming him for THAT. What kind of reasoning could account for that is in question. But I've always said liberals have no reason, or logic They even deny its existence. (Just common sense)

"Bloomberg, Pound Sand!"

In Maine, the forces of the anti-gun fools headed by former New York City Mayor Bloomberg tried to get a measure passed for “universal background checks” that was opposed by many local sheriffs. And what they told him was essentially to “go pound sand.” Much like the response he got in Colorado when he tried to meddle in our local gun laws. They told him, rightly, that such a measure would have NO EFFECT on “gun violence” and was thus a USELESS law, and shouldn't pass. And they're right, just as they're right about ALL the gun laws he promotes. NONE of them have ANY effect on “gun violence” because they target the GUN, not the HOLDER of the gun. Maybe one day the anti-gun fools will “tumble” to that, but I doubt it. They're not smart enough. That's obvious by their basic thinking that if you eliminate guns, you can eliminate crime, too. (Liberty Park Press)

He's Absolutely Rright

An Alabama police chief is getting a lot of flack (from Muslims and Muslim-lovers, of course) for saying they ought to “dip their bullets in bacon grease” to fight Muslim extremists because Muslims fear ANYTHING that has anything to do with pigs. And he's right. Doing something like that can be a “death knell” to the Islamic terrorist movement, because that's the main weakness they've taught them. Of course, the Muslims and Muslim-lovers will scream to high heavens when he says it, and that's a good thing. Anything they fear so much can only be a winner for us. Muslims call it “religious bigotry,” but that's a phony charge, using their usual con. It has nothing to do with religion—at least, not on our side. It's simply a common sense answer to their murderous actions. If they didn't demonize pigs and everything that has anything to do with them, this wouldn't strike fear into the hearts of those who want to KILL us. Objecting to this shows plainly their intent. The more flack he gets over this, the more it shows their intent. (Law Newz)

The Socialist (Democrat) Party

They might just as well admit it, and change their name from the Democrat Party to the SOCIALIST Party. They scream NOT, but everything they propose is socialist/collectivist. From FREE college tuition to easier requirements for food stamps for able-bodied people, to free this, and free that, they want to make EVERYTHING free, to be paid for by those stupid enough to work and make money so it can be STOLEN to pay for all their “freebies.” Then they talk about “redistribution of wealth,” which is “code” for government theft of the EARNINGS of industrious people. Moreover, they work HARD to “take control” of as many things as they can, and propose many STUPID things, such as “gay marriage,” and allowing MEN free entry into places where young (and older) women are NAKED. And threaten to withhold “federal money” from states that don't “knuckle under” and allow it, calling them bigots if they refuse. Then they KEEP money that is PROMISED to the states, out of the money the states sent to the feds, in the first place. They insist on “open borders” so as to allow as many illegal aliens to enter this country as possible, while maintaining an election system that does not require positive ID in order to vote, so these illegal aliens can vote, with most of them voting for the Democrat candidate. They'd like to institute a communist/socialist style government, so long as they continue to be :in charge. Communism and socialism are the same thing, with minor differences in the details. They're both COLLECTIVIST, whose motto is, “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED,” Mqking NEED a demand on the EARNINGS of those capable and willing to EARN, while giving that “stolen” to those NOT capable OR willing to EARN for themselves. It's pure government THEFT, to maintain their total CONTROL. (Just common sense)

"Dads Demand Guns!"

Because it's my ass that has to go see what that noise was.” When the wife wakes up and hears a noise, she does not go to find out what it was. I do. So do I go out there with nothing to use to defend myself if somebody who shouldn't be there is there, and has an ILLEGAL gun? Anti-gun fools say I should “just go back to bed and ignore it.” Safer that way. Also it gives the interloper free rein to steal my belongings, and maybe even come to my bedroom later and kill me. And my wife. No, sir. Not me. I'm going to go out there with my LEGAL gun in my hand, and KILL the SOB if I have to, to defend myself, and my family. If I can't get a gun legally, I'll get it any way I can, for self-defense. Nothing more. And I don't give a damn what your silly “gun laws” say. If I go to jail for that, so be it. My family will be safe. The only thing your silly “gun laws” do is make life easier for the burglars and thugs out there. They do NOTHING to make life safer for us human beings. If I have to break the law to make my family safe, I will. And be damned to you, and your “gun laws.” When the cops take over an HOUR toi get there, I'm the only defense my family has. (Fox 5 DC)

"Not Enough People Killed"

They call it a “small, but vocal minority.” That's what they think the people who respect the constitutional prohibition on banning guns is. Which shows how IGNORANT they are. And Gabby Giffords and her ex-astronaut husband don't think enough people were killed at Townville, so they still concentrate on the Pulse nightclub tragedy, where 49 people were killed. They call it “gun violence.” But actually, it's simply “violence,” with a capital “V.” It would not matter if guns were non-existent, the killing would still go on; with knives clubs,  bombs, even bare hands, if necessary. People who want to kill will find a way, and blaming the gun will not stop the violence as long as violent PEOPLE still exist. This is a “short-sighted “solution,” at best. At worst, it CAUSES even more violence as innocent people are disarmed in the face of attacks from people who don't obey “gun laws.” They just don't understand that, and that causes more and more people to die as law-abiding people obey their laws and “rules,” while “bad guys” do not and they have a “field day” killing people who are stupidly disarmed by the government. (Orlando Sentinel)

Sec. of State Bloomberg?

Damn! What a horrible prospect THAT is! The most prolific “gun-grabber” on the planet running the State Department! Can there BE anything more frightening? Yes, there can. Hillary being president and able to appoint him. You think he can't do anything because of the Constitution? Just look at what OBAMA does! Deny the states the return of PART of their OWN money if they refuse to “knuckle under” to his illegal demands! You put that kind of power in the hands of somebody like Bloomberg at your own peril (We did it with Obama and look what it got us!). We were lucky to survive when HILLARY was Sec. Of State, only because of her ignorance on how to wield that power. Of course, she has learned since, and giving her four years of time to learn more is very dangerous. If you elect her, nobody is going to escape the effect of her presidency. We will become a socialist country in effect, if not in FACT. And if you work and earn your way, YOU will be victimized—count on it. (Just common sense)

Lawbreaking By Fiat

I can't understand what motivates all the fools who want to get rid of our gun rights, in spite of the fact that the Constitution, which forms the BASIS for ALL our laws, GUARANTEES that right. One of the basic NATURAL rights is that of self defense, and the Constitution guarantees us the right to own and use the tools of that self defense. But they want to take away that right, anyway. People like Hillary Clinton PROMISE to do so (by "executive order"), yet they expect to get elected to high office, in spite of it, and in spite of their own CRIMES. Grounds for impeachment include being guilty of “crimes and misdemeanors.” Few candidates go INTO office with KNOWN “crimes and misdemeanors. Wanting to remove our gun rights is a SIGNAL that the politician wishing to do so is a criminal him/herself and wants no opposition. (Breitbart)

"A Terrible Mistake!"

ABC says “It would be a terrible mistake to go after Bill Clinton's sexual affairs next debate.” And why is that? Because Hillary has no answer if it is brought up, and she won't like it? Because it's a “seminal issue” (pun intended) that shows how wimpy she is? How little she knows about making good decisions? ABC is a “good liberal network,” and doesn't want us to bring it up because it is a powerful issue that could “bring her down.” That's why they call it a “terrible mistake.” I fail to see why we should accept advice from liberals on how to run a campaign or to vote. Their advice is guaranteed to cause us to lose. They SAY it's because of the “Town Hall Format” that it would not be a good idea. That's their story and they're “stickin' to it.” But in reality, it's one “weak spot” in her campaign that has yet to be properly explored, and they're scared to death it will be brought up, in ANY format. (News Busters)

Was Scalia Murdered?

Hillary's campaign chairman Podesta mentioned “wet work” in connection with Scalia's death, while Chelsea wrote that, “Now Scalia is dead, we can now enact gun control legislation.” A real “gun-grabber,” that girl! In “DC Speak,” wet work means assassination. I've maintained, since the day he was found dead in his bed with a pillow over his face, on a ranch owned by a Clinton associate, that he was murdered. That was borne out by the sloppy way the autopsy and the inquest into his death was handled. In the death of such an important figure, that inquest SHOULD have been handled in the most careful manner, but it wasn't. The “inquest” was held ON THE PHONE, and signed off on by a “lowly” justice of the peace, not a real judge (obviously, there was a search to find one that was “malleable”). What better way to cover up a murder than that? Such people are much easier to “buy” than real practitioners, and I believe that's what happened. The only thing they didn't count on was the Republicans balking on allowing Obama to appoint yet another liberal to the court, and to wait until after the election, when there was a chance of a non-Clinton associate being elected, and a non-liberal Justice to be appointed. Podesta obviously agrees, and approves. (Gateway Pundit)

102 More Criminals Released

Obama talks a good game on crime control while doing everything he can to increase it. If he thinks commuting the sentences of 102 more criminals, many of them with gun crimes, will reduce crime, we need to commit him to a mental hospital. He's INSANE! I can see his purpose. It's to bolster his claims that “crime is out of control” so he can make more and better laws to better control all of us in the name of “crime control” and “gun control." He figures releasing so many criminals will do two things: one, they'll commit even more crimes, and two: they'll vote more Democrats back into office. Felons can't vote, you say? Watch 'em! If you think these 102 felons (and all the others he has released) won't vote illegally, since they don't have to properly identify themselves because Democrats won't allow it, they need to send you to the mental hospital alongside Obama. Obama has commuted the sentences of more criminals than the last ELEVEN presidents, COMBINED! What's the reason? I just told you, above. (Guns)

More Proof

A Waffle House that is a “gun-free zone” in Georgia has been robbed at gunpoint TWICE recently. I guess their “no guns” policy didn't work very well, did it? Too bad. I liked the waffle House near where I live. Too bad I'll never go back there. I don't want to be shot by some fool criminal who doesn't obey such rules, and SEEKS OUT places with a rule like that because he can be pretty sure there will be no guns there to oppose him. These liberal damned fools never learn. Their policies fail time and time again, but they insist on keeping them, while more and more people keep getting victimized by them. This proves that the people making these laws and policies don't have much in the “brain locker.” Doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result is the DEFINITION of insanity. (Guns)

Every Four Years

You'd think the American people would “get wise” to the scam, but they don't. Every four years, a few weeks before the presidential election, a “sexual abuse” allegation (with no proof) arises against the Republican candidate. Never the Democrat candidate. It has been happening as long as I can remember, and that's a long time. Yet every time it happens, the news is full of people who fall for it, and sometimes they even vote, based on it, not on the issues, and often the Democrat candidate wins on the basis of it. Now look at today. Right on time, about four weeks before a hotly contested, very close presidential campaign, they “discover” an eleven year old conversation between Trump and another man, in which Trump makes some damaging remarks.

Where has that tape been all these years? Probably in a Democrat vault somewhere, just in case Trump ever ran for office. It didn't come out when it was made, because Trump was a Democrat, at the time. Then right out of the woodwork, right on time, come a bunch of women accusing Trymp (without proof, of course) of sexual misconduct, They make a big thing about SEVEN women saying virtually the same thing, as “proof” they're telling the truth. But to me, it says they're reading from a script. Most likely supplied by Democrats. I don't believe for a minute that a man as rich as Trump, who could have as much sex as he wished, any time he wished, would make the kind of crude advances they describe. Come ON! Just walking up and running his hand under her dress? Forcing her against the wall kissing her without her permission? Damn! Could they BE more transparently stupid? Meanwhile, while we're obsessing over that, we're not talking about Hillary's crimes. (Just common sense)

Homicides At Lowest Rate

The lowest rate since 1966. Betcha didn't know that, with all the anti-gun rhetoric lies being tossed around by people who should know better, but don't. Violent crime did TRIPLE between 1966 and 1991. But then, more and more honest citizens began buying guns to defend themselves against all those ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of criminals. One thing usually not mentioned is that most gun crime is gang-related. In other words, kids too young to have guns legally running around killing each other for being in the wrong place. But anti-gun fools keep aiming their “laws” at LEGAL gun owners, who are NOT the problem, and IGNORE those who ARE the problem. Thus, they make it harder and harder for honest, law-abiding people to defend themselves against all the ILLEGAL guns out there. There are many other things you should know, but no room here to list them all. To learn them, read the article linked here. (Libertarian Republic)

Celebs Increase Armed Security

After the Kim Kardashian jewel robbery, celebrities are increasing their armed security while still being against gun rights for “:normal people.” Apparently they think if you can afford to hire your guns to be carried for you, armed security is okay. But nobody should be allowed to carry their own guns, unless they're in the armed security business. This is a typical elitist attitude, where “special people” should be allowed things denied to “normal people.” It's the same with politicians, who mostly all run around surrounded by men carrying guns while denying us the right to carry our own guns for self protection. Some politicians even have their own guns, in addition to their armed security. One of those is Sen. Diane Feinstein, one of the most vocal anti-gun fools, who has a “carry permit” to augment the protection provided by her paid “security.” (The Mail)

"You Gotta Prove It!"

Like when Harry Ried said his unnnamed (imaginary) friend told him Mitt Romney didn't pay his taxes for ten years (since proven to be a LIE), the Democrats are saying, “We don't NEED proof! You gotta make Trump prove he DIDN'T sexually abuse those women!” I disagree. They have to prove he DID! The phenomenon of many women “coming out of the woodwork to “pile on” when a man is “accused” of sexual misconduct MANY YEARS AGO, but which was not reported, the evidence (if any) destroyed, happened to Bill Cosby. It happened to Roger Ailes. Women who supposedly have been silent for many years because they were “ashamed,” suddenly aren't “ashamed,” and want only to get “revenge." Now it's happening to Donald Trump at a very suspicious time, just WEEKS before the presidential election where a known criminal wants to beat an honorable businessman to the Oval Office.

Just look at ONE of his “accusers.” A People Magazine writer who did a piece on him years ago now claims he made “unwanted advances” on her DURING the interview for that piece, yet she STILL wrote a very complimentary “puff piece.” Donald LOVED. It seems to me that if he made UNWANTED advances, she wouldn't have written such a complimentary piece, at the very least. And, of course, in NONE of these “accusations” is there ANY PROOF. Any proof that might have existed has long been destroyed, by their own admission. I might be a little quicker to accept their “accusations” but for the TIMING, which is VERY suspicious. I suggest examining the backgrounds of these “aggrieved women” to see how many of them are Democrat campaign workers, or at least Democrats, who are well known for such underhanded tactics. (Just common sense)

"Ban Guns, No More Violence"

That's the fanciful theory of the anti-gun fools, anyway. That's why I call them fools. Their entire campaign is based on “pipe dreams.” It's a pipe dream to suppose that the only violence in the land is done by a gun. Knives are already at the top of the list for instruments of violence, but efforts to ban them are tepid and useless. As are efforts to deny us our constitutional right to own and use a gun for self defense. They can't just BAN guns altogether, so they “dance around” the constitutional prohibition on banning guns by making laws that make them impossible to get into action fast enough to be useful. Therefore, making them USELESS in the face of a criminal, wielding an ILLEGAL gun, who isn't bothered by such “rules.” He neither registers his guns, nor does he obey ANY laws regarding gun ownership and handling. This is the flaw in the thinking of the anti-gun fools. (Just common sense)

They're Sitting Ducks

Many shopping malls, restaurants, and other establishments are making “sitting ducks” out of all their customers. Outfits like Target stores, Wal-Mart, Panera Bread restaurants, and others who have declared their stores “gun-free zones” leave their customers defenseless against criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists. Islamic terrorists have “targeted” “gun-free malls” for their shooting rampages because they know there will most likely be NO GUNS there to oppose them, so they can come in and kill as many people as possible before “good guys with guns” arrive and kill them. Schools, too, are well-known “target-rich” environments.

This is generally true of the “big box stores” that prohibit their customers from bringing their legally-carried guns onto their property. They are “targeted” by would-be mass shooters because there are usually lots of unarmed, defenseless people there. But they also target smaller places, such as Panera Bread, and other smaller stores too, because they are “low-hanging fruit,” and it's like “shooting fish in a barrel.” The cops will eventually arrive, but not until they have killed many people. And they might even escape before the cops arrive. Criminals and other “ne'er-do-wells” don't worry about bringing their guns into such places, just as they don't usually buy their guns legally. So the only people who OBEY such restrictions are the law-abiding, who are not usually the problem, anyway. (NRA News)

Blow 'Em Up!

Iran rebels fired missiles at a US Navy ship, and didn't get “blown out of the water.” That's typical Obama, and stupid. It can only result in more “Iran rebels” shooting at Navy ships. Under any other president, they would immediately cease to exist before the missiles even hit their targets. Obama's big mouth says, “We are committed to supporting free navigation,” while doing everything he can to make sure it doesn't stay free. Refusing to fire back guarantees it. They will call us a “paper tiger,” and they will be right, as long as Obama is in charge. The White House (Obama) condemned the attack, but said nothing about countermeasures against the Iran-backed rebels. Surprise, surprise! It's very instructive that the Houthi Rebels thought they could fire on a US Navy ship and not be annihilated in the next minute. There was a day when such a tiny minority wouldn't have DARED fire on a US ship. Obama has changed all that. (Media Research Center)

China: "Gun-Free Zone"

They have effectively BANNED guns in communist China, for anybody except the cops and government agents. So how did this guy kill his family, and 17 neighbors, to cover up crimes he had committed? They don't say HOW he killed them, since if he used a gun, it would be “bad press” for the government. Even if he didn't use a gun, as most killers in China don't (they use knives, poison, homemade explosives, or arson), it's “bad press.” So they don't mention the method. This proves again what I've been saying all along. A potential murderer, if he can't get a gun, will find a way, as this guy did (if he's guilty, which he is, since in China, you're “guilty until proven innocent”) There will always be guns. Smuggling guns into areas where they are prohibited is “big business,” and is more profitable in such areas than in areas where they are easier to obtain. (Modesto Bee)

"Only Cops Should Have Guns"

John Legend (whom I've never heard of, but apparently a lot of people have) says, cops are prone to kill “innocent” blacks. But “only cops should have guns.” I've said, many times, that liberals don't use logic. That they don't even know what it is, and DENY it's very existence. Then people like this Legend character come out of the woodwork and prove me right, again and again. Meanwhile, that “Black lives matter” gang of fools wants to establish “cop-free zones” where their members can commit their crimes, unbothered by a cop. I sure hope if they're actually taken seriously (and in this day and age, with liberals running things everywhere, somebody may well do it), I don't live in one of their “cop-free zones” where cops aren't allowed. Because if it happens, and one of them accosts me, he's going to DIE. Legend blames “cops being nervous and quick to shoot” on all the gun violence, ignorant of the fact that almost ALL of it is committed by ILLEGAL gun owners, something ALL their laws can do NOTHING about. He says that, in places where guns are prohibited, their violent crime rates and suicide rates go down, and he's wrong. Just the opposite is true. Crime rates SOAR, and so do suicide rates. They still use guns, usually obtained ILLEGALLY. (Breitbart)

Where Is Feminism?

Joy Behar, member of the cast of “The View,” a well-known liberal TV show, called the women who have complained abut being raped or sexually abused by Bill Clinton, “tramps.” Thus displaying a complete LACK of concern about the things some men do to women. Are they “tramps” because they were raped, and refuse to remain silent? The only reason she thinks they are tramps is because they're accusing Bill Clinton, husband of their “favorite mommy, running for president” If they were accusing Bill COSBY now, it would be a different story. Even Hillary said, “Women ought to be believed when they cry rape.” Unless, that is, the raper is Bill Clinton. Then, they become “tramps.” (Media Research Center)

Chicago: The Murder Capital

Chicago, IL, has some of the tightest gun laws in the nation, and they do no good at all. They not only don't keep guns out of the hands of potential killers, they ENCOURAGE them to obtain them ILLEGALLY. One of their biggest “gun problems” is youth street gangs, who regard stealing, intimidating of “normal” people, and “running wild” as “fun.” They don't give a second's thought to the possible consequences of their actions, such as being shot and killed, themselves. Yes, adult criminals and other “bad guys” account for other deaths, but the highest number of “gun deaths” are caused by street gang m\embers, out to “have fun.” None of this is stopped, or even slowed down by all their tight gun laws, and they don't know what to do. So they just keep on making USELESS “gun laws” that do NOTHING to stop the gun violence, sometimes caused by a boy who ventures into the wrong block. (Hot Air)

"Getting Around" the Constitution

Every law hindering honest people in the use of guns for self defense is an effort to “get around” the constitutional prohibition on “abridging” the gun rights of all honest (non-felon) Americans. Making databases of gun owners is an attempt to abridge gun ownership, as are “gun-free zones.” Those who are not criminals and are authorized gun carriers (for any reason) should be able to carry their guns ANYWHERE, unopposed by ignorant property owners or municipal ordinances. EVERY anti-gun law made so far is intended to LIMIT the ability of honest people to be able to get their guns in action quick enough to defend against criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists who, since they usually have ILLEGAL guns, aren't bothered by them. Such things as trigger locks, storing guns and ammo in different places, or even ALLOWING concealed carry (as in one state) but the gun must be UNLOADED, are DESIGNED to “get around” the constitutional prohibition. “Okay, we can't just BAN guns, so let's just make them impossible to use!” In one place, they put a $1,000 tax on each gun, \which was declared unconstitutional, and rightly so. (Marianas Variety)

Phony Moral Outrage

The phony moral outrage the Democrat Party is demonstrating because of Trump's eleven-year-old “trash talk” they have unearthed is FUNNY, coming from the people who spent years trying to destroy morality in society. They LAUDED Bill Clinton and his “zipper down” policy. They told us his sexual exploits WHILE PRESIDENT were unimportant. That sex itself was something not to be considered in politics, because it just didn't matter. That if we didn't like it, we were “old fogeys” and “puritans” who wanted to go back to the days of June Cleaver and “The Beav.” Now they're showing phony moral outrage over Trump's “trash talk” from many years ago, while IGNORING Bill Clinton's RAPES and Hillary's actions in demeaning the accusers.. They have nothing else to talk about, and they don't DARE start talking about Hillary's scandals, so they direct the attention of the public to some intemperate words spoken in private, between men, while IGNORING Hillary's DEFENSE of Bill's rapes and abuses of women. If that's all they have, they're in big trouble. And that IS all they have. Trump scares them to death and they're pulling out all the stops to defeat him—and it isn't working. (Just common sense)

It's always Legal Guns

Anti-gun fools always rail against guns. But the ones they talk about are the guns in the hands of honest, law-abiding people, who are NOT the problem in “gun violence.” It is the holders of ILLEGAL guns who ARE, which none of their laws will do anything about. Criminals and other “bad guys” don't register their guns. They just kill people with them. They talk about the “wild West atmosphere” that will be created if we allow more honest people to carry guns. But what they ignore is that there are ALREADY millions of UNREGISTERED guns “on the streets,” in use by “bad guys” of all kinds. Mostly by young gang members, who don't care who they kill, on purpose or by accident. Who are mostly too young to have guns, but do, in spite of ALL their laws. They don't even TRY to find ways to reduce such ownership. They “go after” LEGAL guns and gun owners, since they're “low-hanging fruit” and easy to oppress. And, like in Memphis, they wonder why “gun violence” is so widespread. (Mississippi Gun News)

Not What They Thought

The anti-gun fools thought putting video cameras on cops would prove their false impression that cops “go hunting” for blacks to kill. But it did something else, instead. It caused the reduction of successful civilian complaints against cops by 93 %! Civilians who come into contact with the cops are PRONE to accuse them falsely in hopes of mitigating their own crimes. A good example is Freddy Gray, in Baltimore, who accidentally killed himself in an effort to incriminate the cops. But the existence of video evidence is damning to the attempts to incriminate cops, buy showing what REALLY happened,. Not what “witnesses” say. Witnesses to cop shootings, many of whom are friends of the ones killed, are notoriously and usually false. But video evidence “puts the lie” to it. That was so in Baltimore, and in Ferguson, MO, and in Charlotte, NC. In Ferguson, “witnesses” swore Brown had his hands up shouting, “don't shoot,” which was proved to be a lie. In Baltimore they swore he was given “a rough ride” by the cop driving the wagon, and THAT was proven to be a lie, again by video evidence.” In Charlotte, the victim's wife swore he had never even OWNED a gun, even though she KNEW he had served 7 years in prison on a gun charge, and she had previously filed for a restraining order on him because he had “threatened her with a gun.” (BBC)

Purposely Creating A Problem

Obama is purposely creating problems for future people by importing as many Muslims as he can. If he thinks importing so many Muslims all at once will not create problems for Americans, he needs his head examined—again. And that's not racism or religious intolerance. It's common sense. Fully HALF the refugees admitted to the United States recently are Muslims. Down from previous numbers, since they must have “tumbled” to the fact we KNOW they're importing many more Muslims than Christians. That number used to be 1500 Muslims to 1 Christian. But even so, Muslims are brought up in a completely different fashion than are Americans, and even the “peaceful Muslims” HATE how we live, and want to change it. And they liberally use our laws to sue people to get their way. One thing they're trying is to make ANY criticism of Islam a crime. And they work HARD to CREATE situations in which they can sue, while liberal judges give them huge “settlements” for objecting to NORMAL American behavior. Of course, we hate some of the things they do, too. Like the way they treat their women, and fathers and brothers killing Muslim girls (“honor killings”) for loving the wrong man, and their propensity to rape women and little boys, which is undeniable, considering the sharp increase in rape of both wherever they go. (MRC TV)

CNN Ignorant About Guns

They say that, since N. Carolina is an “open carry state,” Kieth Lamont Scott was within his rights to be carrying a gun. That shows complete ignorance on how laws work. Scott was a “violent felon,” and thus was BARRED the ownership and use of a gun—period. When the cops saw him holding a gun in his car, he became a “prime target” for arrest. What happened then is in question, but that lie alone, makes all other statements about the case suspect. His wife says he “never owned a gun.” But she has, in the past, taken out a restraining order on him because he “threatened her with a gun.” This shows sure knowledge of her LIE to police. He actually spent 7 years in PRISON on a gun charge. How she expected to support that lie is a mystery. This is how people “whip up” controversy whenever the cops have to shoot a suspect. As in Ferguson, MO, the entire contretemps was CAUSED by the LIE that Brown had his hands up, saying, “don't shoot.” In Baltimore, the lie that was disproved was that the cop driving the police “wagon” gave the suspect a “wild ride,” thus killing him. That was disproved by video evidence, and all six cops charged were exonerated. (The Federalist)

"Trickle-Down Economics"

That's the disparaging and insulting name liberals use to describe the free market, which has been responsible for ALL the advances we have seen in the economy since this country was founded. They call it that because we maintain that if the “rich” get to keep more of their money, they'll use it to fund projects that create jobs and profits for EVERYBODY. Thus, the “trickle-down” effect they hate so much. There's only one problem there. It WORKS. It's the reason this country has been the “destination of choice” for everybody, from all over the world, who want to better themselves. They KNOW they can do it, here, no matter how much the liberals deny it. Liberals talk about “creating jobs,” but they can't. All they can do is get out of the way so the free market can create ALL the jobs. Politicians only create GOVERNMENT jobs, with the tax money they extort from the private businesses. (Just common sense)

She's A Child Actor

Remember that 16-year-old “random audience member” girl who asked Hillary about why women should be judged on their body image? She's NOT a “random audience member.” She's a child actor who was probably HIRED to act a part, and who (unlike other questioners) used a cue card to ask her question. She's the daughter of a Democrat State Senator and campaign worker from Pennsylvania. It's also instructive to note that, sitting right next to her was Chelsea Clinton, Hillary's daughter. This is a typical Democrat political setup, designed to fool the electorate. They really think we're stupid, don't they? This is such a thin scam that I'm surprised they even tried it. Except that they probably thought the “hoi palloi” was too stupid to see through it. (Patriot Post)

Racist Roots of Gun Control

I'll bet you didn't know that the first “gun control laws” in America were made to keep guns out of the hands of Indians—and predictably didn't work. The Indians still got the guns they used to victimize all whites. Soon the laws were widened (as they always are) to include blacks and mulattoes (anybody with a single “drop” of black blood). So the first anti-gun laws were MADE to keep guns away from Indians and black people. And, if they thought they could get away with it, they'd do the same, today. They may not be WRITTEN that way, but in many places, they're interpreted that way. At the same time, the reason so many black males die by cop's guns is that they are SHOOTING at cops, at the time. Not always, but mostly. Of course, they'll call me racist for pointing out this truth, but I don't give a damn. Lately, they've attributed ANYTHING they don't like to racism. Even if they have to change the meaning of certain words they CALL “code words.” (Time Magazine)

More Black Males Die

Data from the Centers for Disease Control (not the most reliable source) indicates that of all the black males between the ages of 15 and 24 who died in 20154, a MAJORITY were killed by a gun. What the “study” didn't say is that most of those young black males were gang members, and were killed by other black male gang members, using ILLEGAL guns. Something all their “gun laws” would have NO control over. This is how they force their false narrative on us. By leaving out the most important things. This proves NOTHING except for the fact that young white men are smarter than young black men, and usually don't join gangs. Of course, they'll call me a racist (again) for pointing out this truth. In Chicago, the chance of a young black man getting shot in the worst neighborhoods (which are predominantly black) is nine times greater than in the safest neighborhood (which is usually predominantly white). Chicago is run by Democrats and has some of the tightest gun-control laws in the nation, coupled with the highest gun death rate. Does that tell you anything? (The Trace)

"World Withut Guns"

'One imbecile made a film titled, “I Want to Live In A World With NO Guns,” and another has invited the maker to the White House. Why not? That's a good place for imbeciles to gather. People who actually believe that if laws were made to outlaw guns, that would make guns disappear from the world, and those who believe that one degree rise in temperature over one hundred years is a “national emergency," and that man could actually cause it, probably think they can put toothpaste back in the tube, too. This guy not only wants all guns gone, he wants the cops to be gone, too. Which signals to me he is a “budding criminal” who wants to victimize people without being bothered by the cops. Obama has signaled his own criminal tendencies by “honoring” this fool! If all guns were actually gone, including the ones normally held by the cops, he and his friends could “run wild” and victimize others at will. Such pipe dreams are the “stuff of legends” among liberals, who aren't too well supplied in the brain department. There are some real damned fools in this world, and one of them is sitting in the White House. (Breitbart)

Making the Cops Nervous

The “Black Lives Matter” fools CLAIM they're protesting cop shooting black men way too often while CREATING an atmosphere where cops will be very nervous any time they are out in public. Which will tend to make them “trigger happy.” when you know a black man is liable to just walk up and shoot you while you're doing nothing but your daily activities, such as fueling your car, you're BOUND to be “quick on the trigger,” in self defense. They're CREATING the very situation they CLAIM to be protesting. \Witness: all the cops who have been killed from ambush while innocently sitting in their well-marked patrol cars, of putting gas in it, They CLAIM that cops go out each day on a “hunting trip,” LOOKING for blacks to kill.

Meanwhile, black men DO go out HUNTING cops to kill. That's a proven fact, illustrated by the blue body count. Every time a cop kills a black man they immediately raise a crowd to riot, whether or not it's a “good shoot.” Thugs come from all over the country (as in Charlotte, NC, where 70% of those arrested in their riot were from out of state) It's like they have a “phone tree” that allows them to IMMEDIATELY whip up a crowd of rioters. This is doing nothing except to get more cops, and even MORE back men killed. There were TWO shootings involving cops in Denver this morning, and already there is a crowd of “protesters” lined up against the cops, and we don't even know if they were “good shoots,” or not. And when we find out, they won't believe it. (Just common sense)

Mall Killer Barred Guns

The anti-gun fools all want to pass more and more laws to “keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them,” in spite of the fact that such laws DON'T WORK, and have NEVER worked. The killer of FIVE people at the Cascade Mall in Burlingtton, WA, was specifically BARRED from gun ownership, due to past felonies and his emotional and mental health issues—but, somehow, he still GOT the gun he used in killing FIVE innocent people. How do they answer that? They don't. They just ignore it, and go on whining for more, tighter gun laws that never work. Anti-gun fools never admit their “solutions” don't work. They just keep on insisting on making more of them, in spite of the constitutional prohibition against their laws. Of course, the “big story” in this article is the fact that a cancer survivor is one of the victims, and nothing is said about the fact the killer was barred from having a gun. (Seattle Times)

Suicide By Cop

You're a cop. You've had a very busy day. You drive up on a “suspicious person” call and a man refuses to take his hands out of his pockets. Then he takes his hands out of his pocket and assumes a shooting stance similar to the one assumed by the cop in from of him, and holding what LOOKS like a gun, and “aims” it at you. Do you shoot?. Absolutely! You don't want to die, today. Immediately, a crowd forms. Like Muslims, the local hoods and thugs must have a “phone tree” that lets them build an “instant crowd” to riot over ANY police shooting. They insist that the victim was unarmed, and he was. But he ACTED like he was armed, and wanted tio kill some cops. You can't depend on the conclusions of “Monday morning quarterbacks” in a life or death situation. You just act. It didn't matter that he was unarmed. He wanted the cops to THINK he was, so they'd shoot him. It's as clear a case of “suicide by cop” as I've ever seen. You can't stop and consider his mental state in a situation like this. Not if you want to stay alive, that is. (Mail News)

Hillary "Not Selling Guns!"

One of the factors that distresses Obama the most is the fact that every time he talks again about his intention to “stomp on” America's constitutionally-protected right to self defense, and to own and use the means to that end, a gun, America buys more and more guns. Consequentially, he has been unwittingly responsible for more gun sales than any gun salesman out there. But conversely, Hillary has never been responsible for an increase in gun sales, no matter how much she talks about doing the same. There's a good reason for that: Obama IS president, has shown clearly that he is DETERMINED to step on our self defense and gun ownership rights, in spite of what the Constitution says. Hillary, on the other hand, is merely a presidential hopeful that intelligent people believe will never get to walk into the Oval Office again, not even as a visitor. Therefore, they need not worry about her supposed future ability to affect their self defense rights. We can only hope we can continue to stifle Obama's ability to violate our rights until he is forced to leave office on January 20, 1917. (Washington Post)

Always Democrat Controlled

Have you noticed that ALL the cities that are in “big trouble” financially are controlled by Democrats? That every one suffering from riots and looting in the name of “fighting police violence” are run by Democrats? Or that all the problems in the federal government have been CAUSED by Democrats? Democrats have been “in control” of most facets of our society for 50 or more years, no matter who holds the office of president. Some Republican presidents are able to beat them, but others suffer from the subversion of the many Democrat-appointed bureaucrats, and liberal members of the academic community. The ugly truth is, the Democrats are INCOMPETENT to govern this country, or any part of it. But they fool the public into “not noticing” that, by lying about their “accomplishments,” as Obama does daily. He says the economy is “fine,” while intelligent people who pay attention know that's a LIE. He talks about the “improvement in unemployment” under him, while MILLIONS of people have GIVEN UP on ever finding another job and have left the work force, allowing him to PRETEND unemployment numbers are “going down,” by no longer counting them. (Just common sense)

Punishing the Hero

One of the firefighters was the hero of the Townville shooting. Being close by, he (and his chief) arrived before deputies, and “took down” the shooter, who had already killed one, and wounded several others. He was armed, but it hasn't been said whether or not he used that gun in his “take down.” Even so, he saved many lives, not to mention his own chief's life. Now, according to the sheriff, he faces FIVE YEARS in the slammer if charges are filed against him for having that gun, notwithstanding the fact that having and using a gun is a constitutional right. They have laws (however unconstitutional) against private citizens being armed there, and he could easily be charged, and give up five years of his life after his heroic actions. This is the world we live in, folks! Stupid laws, made by stupid politicians, that make it a lot easier for CRIMINALS to victimize us with their ILLEGAL, unregistered guns. (WYFF News 4)

Ban Guns, No More Violence!

Haw, haw! Giggle, giggle! Thanks. I needed a good belly laugh. That's the fanciful theory of the anti-gun fools, anyway. That's why I call them fools. Their entire campaign is based on “pipe dreams.” It's a pipe dream to suppose that the only violence in the land is done by a gun. Knives are already at the top of the list for instruments of violence, but efforts to ban them are tepid and useless. As are efforts to deny us our constitutional right to own and use a gun for self defense. They can't just BAN guns altogether, so they “dance around” the constitutional prohibition on banning guns by making laws that make them impossible to get into action fast enough to be useful. Therefore, making them USELESS in the face of a criminal, wielding an ILLEGAL gun, who isn't bothered by such “rules.” He neither registers his guns, nor does he obey ANY laws regarding gun ownership and handling. This is the flaw in the thinking of the anti-gun fools. (Guns)

Here We Go Again!

Cops killed a “young teenager” in the LA area,”shooting him in the back.” He was “unarmed,” and he was “running away with his hands up.” Yeah, right! Cops found guns on the scene. I wonder who was carrying them? And I seriously doubt he was “running away with his hands in the air,” crying, “I'm unarmed!” Of course, nobody talks about the stolen car he was riding in with his friend, and the possibility that he was a street gang member, and was trying to kill those cops. They emphasize his youth, and the fiction that he was “running away,” and “unarmed.” That's a pattern with the “Black Lives Matter" fools. Lie, lie, lie, and twist the truth. And even when the lie is PROVED, insist on TELLING the lie, again and again. Facts don't seem to matter to them. They do everything they can to obfuscate the facts and make the cops “the bad guys.” All they want is for the cops to “go away” and leave the field to them and the rest of the thugs. So they can loot and burn, and steal people's belongings without interference. (The Truth About Guns)

Punishing the Hero

One of the firefighters was the hero of the Townville shooting. Being close by, he (and his chief) arrived before deputies, and “took down” the shooter, who had already killed one, and wounded several others. He was armed, but it hasn't been said whether or not he used that gun in his “take down.” Even so, he saved many lives, not to mention his own chief's life. Now, according to the sheriff, he faces FIVE YEARS in the slammer if charges are filed against him for having that gun, notwithstanding the fact that having and using a gun is a constitutional right. They have laws (however unconstitutional) against private citizens being armed there, and he could easily be charged, and give up five years of his life after his heroic actions. This is the world we live in, folks! Stupid laws, made by stupid politicians, that make it a lot easier for CRIMINALS to victimize us with their ILLEGAL, unregistered guns. (WYFF News 4)

"B-B-But, This Never Happens!"

It doesn't, huh? That's what the anti-gun fools always say, completely ignoring the thousands of times it DOES happen every year, to support their false narrative. Maybe if they asked these 3 “bad guys” they might find out it really does. Oh. I forgot. One of them is dead, and the other two are still hunting the “high timber.” as far away from this woman as possible. If they ever find them where they're hiding, maybe they can ask them. This should happen more often. It might convince some of these fools that think they can just TAKE what they want, brandishing their ILLEGAL guns, that theirs is a very dangerous profession and maybe they ought to find a new one. The article doesn't say if any charges will be taken against this gutsy woman, but if there are, it will be a travesty. She has a right to defend herself against three ARMED criminals entering her home. (The Blaze)

"Falling Out Among Criminals"

Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has come out and said what all intelligent people already knew. That her “buddy” (former buddy, anyway) “rushed to judgment” in charging those six cops in the death of Freddie Gray, who accidentally killed HIMSELF in an effort to incriminate the cops. Marilyn Mosby, the prosecutor, DID “rush to judgment,” but fortunately, “wiser heads prevailed,” and all six cops were exonerated. Mosby, undaunted by her failure, has pledged to “go after the cops” in Baltimore. Rawlings-Blake says there “is no way to 'fix' race relations in America.” Actually, there is. You ,might stop lying to make it seem worse than it has ever been. Baltimore was a “seminal moment” in the “war on cops,” which Mosby seems bent on continuing. She is an obvious cop-hater, even though she CLAIMS she is not, since several of her family are cops. This whole thing has become a “political football” in Baltimore. Nothing is said about what has happened to the six cops she accused except that they still face “departmental review” of the incident, where they can be pilloried on the basis of somebody's OPINION, not on guilt or innocence. If this incident signals the end of Rawlings-Blake's political career, that can only be a good thing. If that also includes Mosby, so much the better. (Baltimore Sun)

Soros Bloomberg Are Mad!

Well, boo-hoo! The Rocky Mountain Gun Owners tell us that George Soros, who recently joined with Michael Bloomberg, both billionaire rabble-rousers and anti-gun fools, are MAD at Colorado because their efforts to “stomp out” our gun rights is in trouble. Well, I'll be happy to help them wring out their crying towels, but that's all. Who the hell CARES if they're “mad at us?” We're mad at THEM for meddling in our affairs! Whatever gives them the idea they have the right to interfere in our state's business, especially to violate the Constitution in any way they can, is a mystery. They know we are GUARANTEED the right to self defense, and to own and carry the means to that end, a gun, but they are still determined to “stomp it out.” It's too bad the Founders didn't prescribe a punishment for people who try very hard to violate it. (just common sense)

When's A Protest Not A Protest?

Attorney General Lynch (an appropriate name, that) said the rioters in Charlotte are “practicing a basic right.” But I disagree. It's not a “protest” OR a “basic right” when they steal and loot cash from businesses; It's not a “protest” then they shoot each other over minor disagreements; attack newspeople and try to burn them to death; throw rocks off bridges at cars containing innocent people; beat up innocent people because they're white; trashing their own neighborhood; attempting to hijack cars so they can victimize innocent people. These are not the actions of protesters.” They are the actions of CRIMINALS, taking advantage of the unrest other criminals have created, in this case, “Black Lives Matter” criminals. This black against white racism being demonstrated in these riots is repugnant to intelligent people, and is acceptable only to fools. (Zero Hedge)

Why Cops Kill

Maybe the better question would be, "Why do thugs try to kill cops?" Because if you shoot to wound, they may be able to shoot back, and that can get the cop killed. Cops are trained to “shoot to stop,” and the surest way to stop the perp is a “kill shot.” and that criminal is usually trying to kill that cop, at the time. And when he's dead, he isn't killing anybody. Yes, there are times when cops make a mistake and kill an unarmed person. Sometimes it's hard to tell if that person is, or is not armed, and the cop has to make a split-second decision that may cost him his own life if he's wrong. “Monday morning quarterbacks: constantly criticize the cops when this happens, after many hours of consideration the cop on the scene doesn't have, but it DOES happen. And yes, there are times when the cop IS wishing to kill the suspect. There are “bad apples” in every barrel. Some of those cases arise because of the things that perp did, causing lots of anger and a “don't care attitude” on the part of the cops. Especially if that perp is KNOWN to have killed a cop, or a defenseless person—like a woman or a child. Yes, that's not right. But it does happen. Another factor is that witnesses LIE. Often they are friends of the perp, and just want to incriminate the cops. So they tell lies, like the “hands up, don't shoot” lie in Ferguson, MO. And the testimony of the perp's wife in Charlotte, NC, that the perp “has never owned a gun,” KNOWING that he has served 7 years in the pen for a gun crime, and after she, herself once took out a restraining order against him for threatening her with a gun. The whole thing is blown way out of proportion by criminals, who just want to do away with the police presence, so they can commit their crimes, unopposed. (CNN)

"Black Lives Matter": Racist

The Black Lives Matter movement is the equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan, in reverse. There's no doubt about it when you hear the words of a BLM protester: “Black Lives Matter protestor: 'Only good white man is a dead white man' “ The last time we heard something like that being said came from the mouth of a man who spent most of his life killing Indians. Replace “dead white man” with “dead Indian.” This fully reveals the way of thinking of those who accept that ONLY “black lives matter,” but the lives of other people don't. The best way to infuriate a BLM fool is to suggest that ALL lives matter. Anybody who can't see that is a fool. Liberals not only don't see it, they insist on pushing the BLM narrative. Meanwhile, BLM is putting a target on the backs of ALL cops. Then they're surprised when some cops become somewhat “trigger happy.” Intelligent people can't blame them, since they know they can be killed from ambush at any time, mostly by black males. And Barack Obama started it all, and continues to push it so he can get a race war started, allowing him to make more onerous laws that better control the people. (Fellowship of the Minds)

Obama To Let UN Take Over

In the last days before he is out of office, Obama is determined to do as much damage to us as possible. As such, he is making a deal to let the UN take over the Second Amendment, AND the Internet.. Never mind he doesn't have the authority to do that, as usual, he's going to do it, anyway. Violating the Constitution doesn't bother him. The Second amendment recognizes a basic RIGHT of all Americans. It can't be removed by giving an outside organization the power to run it without changing the Constitution, itself. And the way to change it is told, IN the Constitution. It cannot be changed by presidential order. But that's what Obama is going to do, and he'll probably get away with it, the way the Republicans are “bending over frontwards” to him in everything else. And there are several other things he is determined to do to damage us. Too many, in fact, to have the room here to list. Obama is a TRAITOR to America, and he has been since the day he was born. And I don't give a damn if they come to get me for saying that. It's the unvarnished TRUTH. (Conservative Tribune)

Reducing Cow Farts

Jerry Brown, governor of California, has signed into law a measure that would require California farmers to reduce cow farts by 40% below 2013 levels, by 2030. this is an illustration of the liberal tendency to require people to do the impossible, and “fine” them if they don't do it. It's a good way to increase receipts without raising taxes. That liberals (and some conservatives with liberal leanings) just “make rules” without regard to the impossibility of attaining that goal, hoping somebody will figure out how to do it, later. And if they can't, it gives them an excuse to “fine” them millions of dollars. Tell me, how do you stop cows from farting? How about horses, and other animals,. Including humans? Can you stop piles of cow dung from emitting methane (stinking)? As usual, they hope to catch that stink and make into an energy source. Another impossible quest. They expect the farmers, who are having enough trouble selling their crops for enough money to come out ahead, to spend $2 million each on “methane digesters” (that they hope exist) for a total outlay of $2 BILLION dollars. Honest, you can't make this stuff up, folks! If you want some good belly laughs (hope they don't make you fart), read the article linked below. (Town Hall)

"Why Am I Not 50 Pts. Ahead?"

Poor Hillary, with all she's done to demonize Trump, now she's whining about not being 50 points ahead of him. She's promising to give us 4, and maybe 8 years more of Obama's stupidity. She's lied and lied, about everything under the sun. She's destroyed thousands of e-mails right after they were subpoenaed by Congress. She's lied to Congress on too many occasions to count. She's used her foundation to collect $billions for access. And all she has on Trump is her unsupported CLAIMS (without anything to support them) that Trump is “unqualified to be president.” And she really wonders why he's beating her? What dim bulb she is! She has committed more crimes in the last year than the worst thug on the street hopes to do in his lifetime. The FBI Director DETAILED her crimes before announcing he wasn't going to do anything about them because “she didn't mean it.” Since when is that a defense? I though ignorance of the law was no excuse? (Just common sense)

Women Can't Use Guns?

Liberals (anti-gun fools) say “the idea that women can use guns in self defense is ludicrous.” Actually, the idea they CAN'T is what's ludicrous. A tiny finger can pull a trigger as well as a big, powerful man. If you don't believe it, just try and beat up a woman who has a gun and is trained in it's user. That is, if you want to end up dead. Just ask the guys who tried it. Oh....you can't....they're dead. Liberals say REPUBLICANS are sexist. But this idea proves that the sexists are in the Democrat Party. It's sexist to even suggest that women can't use a gun ion self defense. Huffington Post says only 15 women used a gun to defend themselves against a man last year, while men killed 1,600 women. And whose fault is that? If more women were able to HAVE guns, that number would soon change. You can read the damned fool article in Huff Post by clicking the link below. We need to advise women of one thing: don't threaten, just SHOOT. And don't let him know you've got it. (Huffington Post)