"Break the Law!"

That's what Obama is telling schools all over the nation when he instructs them to open women's bathrooms and changing rooms to both sexes. It is AGAINST THE LAW for a male of any age to enter a women's restroom or changing room and expose himself. Obama is ORDERING them to VIOLATE THE LAW. What makes him think he has the power to do that is beyond me. But he has gotten away with violating the Constitution so many times, I guess he thinks he can violate existing laws, as well. He has violated existing laws, too, himself. But this is probably the first time he has ever given ORDERS for people to violate the law—not just ignore it, as he regularly does with the Border Control people. Obama is the most lawbreaking president in memory. But this one is the worst, ever. (World Net Daily)

A "Truth Bomb"

Ted Nugent has just dropped a “truth bomb” on the anti-gun fools who think an unarmed community is a safe community. “People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.” A “force monopoly.” I'm a 78-year-old man who can barely walk. I would have NO CHANCE against an ILLEGALLY-armed criminal if he accosted me. And thugs, who are basically cowards, look upon people like me as “easy targets, which makes it much more likely they WILL accost me than younger, able-bodied person. A gun in my hand would make all the difference, while maybe eliminating that thug from future actions against honest people. It makes us EQUAL. And, unlike what anti-gun fools insist, just because I'm armed, I won't be shooting anybody over something as unimportant as a fender-bender or just shooting myself. Responsible human beings don't do things like that. And there are already enough ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of fools to have that happen, since most of them are in the hands of those thugs and gang members, who will kill you for looking at them wrong. (Daily Caller)

Dismantling the Military

That's what Obama is doing. Not only the current military, but also our veteran's medical care. That's according to former Department of Homeland Security officer Philip Haney. And he should know, having been “on the inside.” Haney and his associates collected a “mountain” of information on terrorist networks, but Obama and his crowd have refused to acknowledge it. Information on a major Islamic terrorist system was summarily “shut down” by the State Department, under Hillary and Obama. Their excuse was that they didn't want to “offend” the Muslims, who are the easiest offended group there is.

Haney believes that if he had been allowed to continue his investigation, the information he and his fellow agents uncovered might have PREVENTED the Orlando massacre. And Obama dismantled the apparatus designed to protect us from further attacks by Islamic terrorists that was painstakingly created after 9/11. Meanwhile, Obama is heavily cutting the military budgets to the point where our military will soon be completely UNABLE to stop an attack on the United States, by anybody. One example is a helicopter squadron that has only TWO helicopters capable of flying, due to lack of parts to fix the others. And with almost NO aircraft, pilots aren't getting enough flying time to be able to maintain their flying status. This is an abomination. Haney says what Obama is systematically doing is “dereliction of duty.” (World Net Daily)

"In A Glass House"

Mitt Romney ought to look at his own record and then just SHUT UP. He was giving 16 former Republican candidates for president a hard time for “screwing up” and losing to Donald Trump. It's as if he didn't “screw up” and lose to Barack Obama and condemn us to four more years of Obama outrages. Where the hell does he get off criticizing Republican candidates for the same thing? It's like he has no memory of his own history. Romney is probably the worst LOSER in recent history, and he's criticizing others for the same thing. If he hadn't screwed up his campaign so badly, we wouldn't have been saddled with that incompetent fool that is now in the White House, for another four years. And it is in Obama's last four years, that (he has done the most damage to this country. Romney could have put a stop to Obama, but he didn't. So he should just go home and shut his pie hole. (Politico)

Laws Are Not For Us

That seems to be the general opinion among anti-gun fools. Example: Washington Post columnist Carl Rowan, said, :Anyone found in possession of a gun, except a bona-fide law officer should go to jail—period.” But when he found an unauthorized teenager swimming in his pool, what did he do? He ran out and shot him, with his gun. Did he go to jail for possessing a gun? Doubtful. He's a liberal, after all. Then there's Katie Couric's producer, who traveled to different states and bought guns, to bring back to New York, ostensibly to do a “documentary” designed to demonize guns. We don't know how many laws she violated, but nobody's pressing the issue, anyway. She's a liberal, right? They hate guns, but what do they suggest as a remedy? Take them out and SHOOT them! Senator (now Secretary of State) John Kerry talked about “assassinating George Bush?" Then there's the Democrat representative who said Rick Scott should be “put up against a wall and shot” instead of running for Governor of Florida because he was pro-gun? These people are so hypocritical the word hypocrite isn't harsh enough. And their rhetoric is VERY violent. That's what happens when people run out of arguments. They go immediately to insults and threats. (Gun Owners of America)

Ignoring The Danger

That's what we seem to be doing about Islamic terrorism. Obama is “leading the parade.” He has recently ordered his people to DELETE information they have carefully accumulated about Muslim terrorists IN the United States (sometimes at the cost of lives)! And way too many judges have given MASSIVE judgments to Muslims, who are the most offended bunch ever. I think they go out LOOKING for something to be offended by, and for which they can sue, and swindle lots of money out of Christians. Meanwhile, people like the Orlando shooter legally buy guns, without any kind of investigation, even after having been “investigated” by the FBI for ELEVEN MONTHS in the past (the information gained was probably ordered scrubbed by Obama). What is it going to take for Americans (starting with Obama) to realize the deadly danger in which their ignorance puts us? When they, themselves, are KILLED due to their ignorance? (Just common sense.)

Why Islam Should Be Banned

Muslims insist that ANY criticism of Muslims is an “assault on religious liberty.” It is NOT. Any “religion” that preaches HATRED for members of other religions to the point where a mother would burn her own daughter to death for marrying the wrong man (probably not a Muslim) should be ENDED, and deleted from memory. The woman who did this is a “peaceful Muslim,” in that she burned her own daughter to death, not an American, or a citizen of another country. People who are so heavily INDOCTRINATED in a false religion that they murder their own CHILDREN to please the Imams are FOOLS, and their “religion” should be ENDED. It should not be allowed to infect the lives of others, who are too intelligent than to believe the crap they teach, but will be affected by the DEATH they preach. (Allen West)

Major Birmingham Gun Problem

England has some of the toughest gun laws in the world. Why then, does Birmingham have such a major problem with gun crime? Could it be that criminals and gang members are IGNORING those gun laws? How is that possible? Don't criminals and gang members obey laws? Thinking they do is one of the basic flaws in most current gun laws. There are many other flaws in the laws they're currently making that not only makes them USELESS in stopping gun crime, they actually PROMOTE it. Therefore, these laws get people KILLED. But you'll never get them to admit that. Less than a half hour after a recent killing at UCLA the anti-gun fools were fund-raising, using that crime to con more money out of gullible people. They don't really want to make laws that work. If they did, hopefully, the problem would go away and their lucrative jobs would be gone. And they don't want that. Whipping up anti-gun sentiment pays too well. (Birmingham Mail)

Incompetence In Government

We're all angry over the many outrages perpetrated on us by one Barack Hussein Obama, whom we (not me) elected TWICE in our ignorance, so he could work tirelessly to destroy this as a free market nation. He, and other fools like him, try to convince us that the free market (which they call “capitalism” as an insult) is NOT the reason why this is the destination of choice for ALL who want to improve their lives. That it is not the reason we have surpassed, in less than 300 years, anything other countries, which have been around for thousands of years, have accomplished. They think socialism is the only real system, even though socialism has FAILED, everywhere it has been tried, eventually. Or soon will. Some socialist governments survive for a time, until they run out of the money provided by the “producers” of society, or the money GIVEN them by other socialist nations that have some left (Example: Cuba). There are many examples of their incompetence, and this article lists only a few. But I'm sure you can spot others, once your eyes are opened. (iPatriot)

GOP Is Stupid!

And getting stupider. Any political party that is so dead set against it's own presumptive nominee that they would actively work to elect his opposing candidate in the OTHER party ought to be run out of town on a rail. They're more interested in retaining their power to DICTATE who we can vote for than what is good for this country. They KNOW Hillary is DEATH for this country and her election will only lead to disaster. But they don't care about that. They'd rather see the destruction of this country as a free nation than lose their power to appoint whomever they please, so we will be forced to vote for them. The Republican Party is FINISHED as a viable political party in this country. They will soon go the way of the Whigs. And that fate is richly deserved. (American Spectator)

"Friendly Fire"

Target Stores shareholders aren't too happy with the policy to allow men to enter women's restrooms and/or dressing rooms if they decide they're women today. They demanded an answer from their CEO as to why this was done. He kept repeating that “mantra” about “inclusivity” (not even a word) and “diversity,” completely ignoring the fact that transgenders are less than .01% of the populace, at large. The shareholders said that “He just doesn't seem to understand that he has offended the sensibilities of millions of Americans.” By so doing, he has cost Target billions of dollars in lost sales. I wouldn't give a dime for his job, soon. He thinks he is boss and his word is law. But he'll soon learn that the shareholders are more powerful than he ever was. And they're PISSED! Maybe there aren't too many transgenders among them, either. The CEO said this had not affected Target's financial performance in any way, ignoring the significant drop, worth $billions, in their stock price, dating from the day the new bathroom policy was announced. The shareholders said that “bordered on fiduciary negligence.” Harsh words, and I'd bet a prelude to demanding his resignation as CEO. (World Net Daily)

Trump: 70% Negatives

If that's true, why does Trump get tens of thousands of people at his rallies, consistently? Ten times what any Democrat has gotten at their rallies! I think we need to look more closely at the methodology of the the “polls.” I think they only questioned liberals (Democrats). I think they took their “surveys” in the lobby of the Democrat Headquarters. I think it's horse manure, put out by the “establishment,” designed to make their fantasies come true. It's the same thing when they talk about Hillary BEATING Trump in the polls. She has had, for most of her campaign, just ONE person opposing her, and that an ADMITTED socialist. While Trump started out with 16 opposing candidates, and he “swept through” them like a scythe through a wheat field. He is one of the most successful candidates in the history of presidential elections. How could he do that with 70% negatives? (Hot Air)

Ninth "Circus" Rules

The liberal “Ninth Circus” Court has ruled. The most reversed court in the land has ruled. They ruled in favor of California's requirement that applicants show “good and proper reason” to need to carry a gun in order to get a “carry permit.” And in so doing, said that Americans have NO right to carry a gun for self protection, or for anything else. This is a good example of what we'll get if Hillary gets elected and is able to appoint the next Supreme Court Justice. “Rulings” that are patently AGAINST the Constitution, when their ONE job is to UPHOLD the Constitution. Liberals on the Supreme Court are famous for ruling AGAINST the Constitution, even though they are THERE to UPHOLD it

 They are dishonest, and commonly rule, NOT by what the Constitution SAYS, but by their prejudices and BIASES. It is through liberals on the court that liberals plan to eliminate the Constitution as an obstacle to their intentions, forever. Little by little they “nibble” at it with rulings like this. Their next move is to get the Second Amendment repealed. After that will be the First Amendment. When that happens, this will cease to be a free country, when the ability to criticize the government without fear of criminal prosecution is removed, They're already working on it (in California, where else?) with their attempts to criminalize criticism of global warming acolytes. The source listed here is a liberal site, so take what they write with several grains of salt. (Slate)

Dead In A Gun-Free Zone

Panera Bread Restaurants are ALL “gun-free zones.” so you ought to be safe there, right? These two cops were NOT. Somebody saw this guy “acting strangely” in a Maryland Panera Bread and called the cops. Two deputies arrived, and he promptly shot them to death before they even knew what was going on. How is this POSSIBLE? There aren't supposed to be any guns in Panera Bread restaurants. It's obvious this guy ignored their rules, as all those wishing to commit crimes do. People who plan on committing crimes do not obey laws or “rules” that say they can't bring their guns there. Gun-free zones are really stupid “answer” to gun violence. All they do is DISARM honest, law-abiding people, who aren't the problem, anyway. They do NOTHING to prevent criminals, who don't OBEY laws or rules, from bringing their guns, and that gets people killed. But the anti-gun fools will never learn that. I, and others keep telling them, but they never listen. They're too damned stupid. (Guns 'n' Freedom)

Missing the Point

On purpose. That's Obama. He denies the very existence of Islamic terrorism, and gets mad when somebody mentions it. He asks what effect his mentioning it would have on the terrorists when he should be asking what his refusal to name the enemy really means. What is means is this: it reveals his BIAS against fighting the Islamic terrorists because he says he doesn't want to “”offend” our “Muslim friends” (if there are any). But everything he does helps the Islamic terrorists to advance their goals to destroy America, and every “un-believer” in it. From HELPING them by paying the way of thousands of Muslim “refugees” to infiltrate America, down to telling his henchmen to DIVERT all complaints directed at Muslim troublemakers, and ordering them to “scrub” all mention of Muslim outrages in their records. He has done everything he can to ASSIST them in their endeavors. Obama and Hillary both say Trump has shown his UNFITNESS to be president for having the temerity to ACCUSE Obama of what is becoming more and more evident every day, that he is ON THEIR SIDE! If they don't like me saying that, have at me! (Just common sense)

Couric Eliminates Lott

You've no doubt heard of John Lott, the world's foremost authority on the gun issue. Katie Couric asked him to come to New York for an interview, where she and 7 staffers tried valiantly to get him to say something they could twist to sound like what it wasn't. So, after FOUR HOURS of an”interview” that was supposed to last only an hour, she gave up and left. He tried to get some of his results brought out, but Couric said that most of it had been discredited in many ways. Only one little problem. It had NOT been discredited, in any way. Even some people who set out to discredit his research wound up supporting it. So what did Katie do with this four-hour interview? She left it completely OUT of her propaganda piece. She wasn't able to get words she could twist, like she did with others, so she just IGNORED the foremost authority on the “gun issue” in the country. This is what liberals do. They make “documentaries” in which they only honestly interview people they know will agree with them, and selectively edit interviews with people like Lott. But Lott was better at avoiding the pitfalls she set for him, so she just eliminated the interview and falsely called his research “discredited.” (America's First Freedom)

Laughable Election

I can't believe how STUPID we've become (not me)! We've boiled down this election to be one billionaire businessman used to dealing in billions of dollar deals vs. Two socialists, one ADMITTED and one who still denies it while she spouts socialist giveaways all over the place. A housewife who spent a long time protecting her husband from the results of his philandering, and FACILITATING it. A woman who was GIVEN a Senatorship and later, the job of Secretary of State by the Democrats, so she had something to do while Obama screwed up this country royally, both jobs which she botched badly. The only people who would vote for either of these fools just want a “free ride,” at somebody else's expense. And that's what they promise. Now that she's been GIVEN enough delegates to win the Democrat nomination, she really thinks she's done something. But she hasn't. Up to now, all she's had running against her was a previously unknown outside of his own state ADMITTED socialist, and she needed the party to give her delegates she didn't earn, while Bernie won primary after primary and, mysteriously wound up with fewer delegates. Now she will be running against REAL candidate, who will “mop the floor with her.” If he doesn't, we're DONE as a free country. (WHO TV)

It's Not About Gun Control!

The anti-gun fools have been quick to get their “presses rolling” on a new drive for “gun control” after this Muslim radical murdered half a hundred gays in a gay night club in Orlando, Florida. Obama admits it is “terrorism,” but, as usual, won't breathe the word, “Islamic.” But it's not about gun control. It's about TERRORISM control, which is, as usual, being ignored. With the rise in gay activism and it's recent successes, you can expect more attacks on gays, soon. They're acting like bullies and targeting people they KNOW will refuse to do business with them on religious principles, so they can sue them out of business. They have to expect some backlash. Muslims, who hate homosexuals, anyway, can be expected to react violently, as they are wont to do. Incompetent politicians (beginning with Obama) still think all you have to do is make a law, and potential lawbreakers will obey it, including radical Muslims, who don't give a CRAP about our laws. (iPatriot)

"It Would Take 75 Years!"

The State Department is now using a really original and outrageous excuse as to why they can't come up with all Hillary's e-mails: “It would take 75 years!” So now they want to stop providing them, altogether. Think about what would happen if you used an excuse like that on the IRS. “I've got so many receipts, it would take YEARS to get them all together, so you're just going to have to do without them.” You'd be in prison so fast, you'd be spinning. That means they won't be able to release all of her e-mails until 2091. Of course, the way things are going, there might not BE an America, as we know it by then. The simple answer is to go through as many as they can, and release as many as they can. But they never think of things like that. They're trying to protect Hillary long enough for her to be elected president, so she can order that investigation stopped. They're also saying, “Some of them ate too damaging to release.” Damaging to WHOM? Hillary? Other politicians? The State Department? I'm really getting tired of this “dog and pony show.” I'd like for it to be over, with Hillary getting what she deserves. (CNN)

France Is "Gun-Free"

So somebody fired at a tourist bus from a freeway overpass, injuring several. This guy was obviously not a very good shot, because he was only able to INJURE several people (including a child) with flying glass. So how did he get the gun he used? I say, :he” because such shooters are, so far, ALWAYS men. You liberals, don't get excited about that and get off subject. France is literally “gun-free.” So how did this shooter GET his gun? Anti-gun fools tell us that when guns are outlawed, there will BE no “violent crime.” So how did this happen in a country that is one big “gun-free zone?” Maybe they're LYING to us and assuming things not in evidence, as they always do. I haven't checked into it, but I'd bet the “gun crime” went up significantly after they, in effect, BANNED guns in France. (BBC)

Is It Terrorism?

Or just hate? Or both? One crazy Muslim who was incensed because he once saw two men kissing on the street in Miami went into a gay night club and opened fire, killing (so far) 50 people and wounding (so far) another 50 until he was stopped, and KILLED by responding men with guns (cops). There was ONE cop there early, who engaged him in a gun fight, and stopped, or slowed down his shooting spree. Then a “hostage situation” developed, and the other cops waited 3 hours while people died from lack of medical care, before “going in” and rescuing another 30 people. Anti-gun fools are already working overtime to use this to raise more money and get more of their USELESS “gun laws” passed, none of which, so far, have done ANYTHING to stop gun violence and, in fact, INCREASED it by keeping law-abiding people unarmed so they can't defend themselves against people like this shooter. Word is (not proven at this time) that he had an AR-15, the favorite gun to be blamed by the anti-gun fools in any mass shooting. Also, word is, this guy had NO record, so would probably have no trouble buying a gun legally. It is not known (yet) if he got his guns legally, but that is of no moment. Guys like this never seem to have any trouble getting their guns ILLEGALLY. Anti-gun fools confidently say that tighter laws on gun ownership will keep things like this from happening, But most such shootings happen in areas with the toughest gun laws. More later, as facts become available. All this is currently very preliminary, as the story is coming out. (L. A. Times)

Subject To "Reasonable Regulation"

Hillary says, “Okay, owning guns is a constitutional right.:But, like any other constitutional right, it is subject to reasonable regulation.” “Reasonable” regulation? Gimme a break! Liberals always call their attempts to circumvent, and make moot, the Second Amendment, “reasonable.” But they're anything BUT “reasonable.” But this statement told us a lot more than she intended. She revealed her plan to strip us of our constitutional right to be armed in self-defense, by making very UN-reasonable regulations that will make the guns we have, USELESS. Her “reasonable regulations” include such stupid things as “no gun zones,” gun locks, trigger locks, and even allowing people to CARRY their guns, but the guns must be UNLOADED! Tell me—what the hell good does an UNLOADED gun in your pocket do you when you encounter an ILLEGALLY-armed criminal in the process of committing a crime? He doesn't give a good damn about the “reasonable regulation” that any gun carried must be unloaded! He'll KILL you while you load your gun. Of course, the liberal-run Washington Post says what she says is “wavering” on gun control. And we're supposed to BELIEVE that crap! (Washington Post)

Muslims In White House

Muslim radicals are taking over the White House. This is not about religion, though they will claim it is. It's about RADICAL Muslims with clear ties to Muslim terrorist organizations being appointed, willy-nilly, to important, sensitive White House positions where they are privy to all the most sensitive information, by Barack Hussein Obama. It's very suspicious, considering the suspicions already attendant that Obama is actively HELPING the radical Muslims in their efforts to “take over” America and ultimately the world with their ancient and flawed, “religion.” This information can be used to seriously inhibit our ability to win the “war against terrorists” we are now waging, whether Obama will admit it, or not. I think his refusal to even NAME Islamic terrorism is all part of his scheme to submit to Islam. (Before It'sNews)

Excluding Muslims: Common Sense

Donald Trump is getting a lot of flack from liberals (who else?) for having the temerity to suggest “temporarily” banning the entry of “Muslim refugees” until they can be properly vetted.. But in Israel, where there is a SERIOUS problem with Palestinians (who are Muslim) because they come in, disguise themselves as Orthodox Jews, and kill people at random, are doing just that. Allowing Muslims that can't be vetted to move here is MADNESS! It can only result in the DEATHS of many Americans. It is NOT “religious persecution” because Islam has proven itself to be a PHONY RELIGION. It is not a real religion. It is a political system MASQUERADING as a religion to take advantage of the “perks” we give to religions. It is a WEAKNESS, which we must correct. And Trump is the man to do it. (Allen West)

Creating A Crime Wave

That seems to be what Obama is doing when he releases 86,000 violent criminals to prey on honest people while, at the same time, doing everything he can to DISARM us in the face of the crime wave he is creating. Then he imports hundreds of thousands of “Syrian refugees,” including only ONE or TWO Christians so far, the rest Muslim males of fighting age—almost no women, children, or old people who can't fight. How many of them are Islamic terrorists using that to gain entry into the United States so as to kill Americans? He is working HARD to create a crime wave, while making NO special provisions to deal with it. Just those 86,000 illegal alien criminals he released have committed 200,000 violent crimes in the last couple of years. Meanwhile, Obama is suppressing reports of the carnage HE created, so we won't know about it. (World Net Daily)

Obama Lies Again

I don't know why I made that the headline. It's not news when Obama lies. He lies just about every time he opens his mouth, and many times when he doesn't. Remember that “I've got my pen” crack? But actually, it's what he lied ABOUT that is at issue here. He has the GALL to say to gun owners, “I don't want to take away your guns!” Meanwhile, he and his cohorts are doing everything they can to take away your guns. This is one of the best examples of why you should never listen to what a politician SAYS. Watch what he DOES! And Obama does everything he can to do just the opposite of what he says he will do. He is the most deceiving president we've ever had. He set a new standard for lying in office, exceeding Bill Clinton's lying record by a lot. Just the other day he took credit for a “booming economy” that does not exist. I know it doesn't exist. You know it doesn't exist. HE knows it doesn't exist, but he still wants us to believe it does. He must really think the American voter is STUPID. And he may be right. They voted for him TWICE, didn't they? (PBS News Hour)

Whomping Up Their Press Releases

I just watched a live shot of a shooting that happened at Dallas Love Field in Texas and I'll guarantee you the anti-gun forces, without waiting for the facts, are “whomping up their press releases” and their appeals for more money from those gullible fools who agree with their absurd notion that making laws against LAW-ABIDING people having guns will stop gun violence. One guy was filming, and predictably, as soon as shots were heard, his aim with the camera went crazy so you couldn't see the important part of the shooting. He finally got it under control and what appeared to be a cop aiming his gun into the terminal could be seen. One person has been transported to the hospital. It was the attacker, who had no gun. Only a big rock, which he tried to use on the cop, who shot him. Look for the anti-gun fools to make hay out of this. He had apparently used big rocks to attack his woman, who was trying to get away from him. The only shots fired were fired by that cop. (RT Question More)

Clinton Scandal Dwarfs Trump's

She's braying about the “scandal” she attributes to Trump regarding “Trump University,” something that has not been proved, while ignoring her own similar scam that dwarfs the “Trump University scam.” And that's just one of the swindles she's guilty of, and that's not even counting her e-mail scandal. The swindlers paid Bill Clinton $1.6 million to be their chief touter, while the Clinton foundation gave $56 million to Laureate, Inc., one of the companies connected to the swindle. Bill abruptly resigned as “Honorary Chancellor” when that was revealed. They apparently paid Bill through a “shell company” where money deposited “passed through” to Bill. A company that escaped notice of the State Department while Hillary was Secretary of State. Such swindles are part and parcel of the Clinton Crime Machine, but nobody investigates th Clintons seriously while “working over” their opponents. If not for outfits like Judicial Watch, they wouldn't be investigated at all, even halfheartedly. (World Net Daily)

Anti-Gun Fool Illusion

Or should I call it a DELUSION? They are DELUDED if they think ANY of the “gun laws” they currently have in force will do ANYTHING to stop people like the UCLA shooter from getting a gun. This killer bought his gun legally in Minnesota. In so doing, he passed one of Obama's “strict background checks, since he didn't have a criminal record. So far, he's obeyed every law. Then he went and killed a woman whose name was on his “kill list,” and set out for Los Angeles on his kill spree. In so doing, he broke the laws of every state he passed through concerning carrying guns in their territory, including that of California. Then he took his gun onto a college campus, which was, of course, a “no-gun zone,” breaking another law. Arriving there, he murdered a professor, whose name was also on his kill list, then killed himself. What existing law could have stopped him? Maybe if that professor had been able to carry a gun, he could have been stopped before his last murder, maybe not. The point is, this guy obeyed, and disobeyed laws as it was convenient for him. He was not stopped in his evil intentions, by ANY law. Especially the “no gun policy” on college campuses. They're USELESS. (Gun Mart)

Put Obama In Prison!

That's where he belongs, not in the White House. Obama is destroying this country—ON PURPOSE! Many say he's just stupid, and has no idea what he's doing. I maintain that he's NOT stupid. He knows very well what he's doing, and the results he can expect. That's his plan. He wants to destroy this economy so he can blame “capitalism,” his derogatory word for the free market, and finish the move from a free market economy to socialism. And he's almost there. Everything he does is CALCULATED to harm this country. From releasing “:mad dog killers” to kill us to denying the very EXISTENCE of Islamic terrorism and thus doing a miserable job of “fighting” it. Then there are the THOUSANDS of AMERICAN rapists and murderers he is releasing from prison, claiming they are “only there on drug charges,” who have murdered HUNDREDS of people (in America) since their release.

Meanwhile, the “loyal opposition” in Congress does NOTHING to put a stop to his outrages. They even FINANCE them by passing his spending bills in Congress, which they control. And the Democrats certainly aren't going to do anything. He has committed many obvious CRIMES, one of the most obvious was in Benghazi, Libya (with Hillary) where four people, three heroes and one ambassador, were MURDERED, while his troops were ordered to “stand down.”. People talk about a presidential CANDIDATE being under a criminal investigation. How about a PRESIDENT who is a worse criminal than she ever managed to be! (iPatriot)

The Unansweraable Question

It's a question usually never asked of an anti-gun fool when they screech about making more and better gun laws every time somebody misuses a gun. The question is, “Specifically, what law would have stopped this killing?” This question is now being asked of the anti-gun fools as they clamor for more laws in the wake of the UCLA killing that started in Minnesota, where the killer (now dead) killed a woman whose name appeared on his “kill list.” It's a question they can't answer truthfully, because all the laws they passed in the past have failed to do so. But they persist in making their USELESS “gun laws,” and those laws continue to fail to do ANYTHING about “gun violence.” That's because they target the GUN, not the person HOLDING the gun. They make laws that people with evil intentions IGNORE as a minor irritant when they want to do murder or mass murder. (National Review)

Obama's Economic Fantasies

He's out there saying, “I already made America Great Again!” And he really believes it! Notwithstanding he DOUBLED the national debt, owes $20 TRILLION DOLLARS, Millions of able-bodied Americans are out of work and have been for so long they've given up ever finding a viable job again and have left the work force. Which allows him to count ONLY those left for his PHONY 5% unemployment figure. He says, “Without me, we wouldn't have gotten where we are.” And he's right. The dangerously bad economic situation we find ourselves in is HIS FAULT. He did it. But he doesn't count it as bad, which proves this economic illiterate should NEVER have been elected president, let alone twice. He takes credit for measures passed by REPUBLICANS in the Indiana legislature that have improved things in that state. Which is common. He always takes credit for what other people do, while continuing his incredibly STUPID policies everywhere else. (Patriot Post)

Racially Excluded

You'd think, in a Chicago gun buy-back “dog and pony show,” that guns owned by white people would be as welcome as guns from black people, wouldn't you? Not even! They systematically turned away EVERY gun offered by a white person while accepting similar guns brought in by black people. I wonder why? Maybe they realize that most white people who own guns don't use them to commit crimes, while black people do, more often than not. Or maybe they're just racists. The exclusions were accomplished by a “surly female” from the mayor's office, so you can probably assume, on goof evidence, that they were excluded by order of the mayor. Is he finally revealing his racism? One wonders. Democrats are the worst racists, historically, while they ACCUSE Republicans, who voted FOR the Equal Rights Amendment while Democrats actually tried to BLOCK it. Of course, they'll deny their racism, but the facts make liars of them, as so often happens. (Guns Save Lives)

It's Not Prejudice

It's common sense. Democrats want to impart prejudice into the very natural distress we feel as Obama imports (at out expense, of course) thousands of “Syrian refugees” without any kind of “vetting.” Among them are going to be many Islamic TERRORISTS, out to kill as many Americans as they can, and through “being offended” at what is natural to us, cause as many problems as they can. Since it is impossible to tell “peaceful” Muslims from the terrorists, we tend to look at ALL of them with suspicion. That's not prejudice, it's COMMON SENSE. But Bernie and Hillary try to convince people that the ONLY reason to view Muslims with suspicion is prejudice, which is very STUPID on their part. People who use that kind of tomfoolery to get votes should not even be CONSIDERED to become president, or for any other elective OR appointive office. (CNN)

Just Half An Hour

That's all it took for gun haters to start demanding more and tighter “gun laws” while trying to raise money on the recent shooting at a college that claimed the life of one professor, as well as the shooter. NO questions asked about whether or not the gun used was legally owned, because that doesn't matter to them. The fact is, it doesn't matter. If the shooter doesn't have a record of any kind, he can legally buy the gun. If he does have a record, he would ALREADY be prohibited from buying a gun legally. What is not said here is that ALL the laws against buying guns for certain people would do NOTHING to reduce gun violence. People who want to use guns for violence will still get their guns, in a back alley, somewhere. What laws are made should be to make it tougher on illegal gun sellers, or more costly, while making it easier for honest, law-abiding people to own and carry guns for self-defense. There are already too many ILLEGAL guns on the streets, in the hands of fools in gangs, and other kinds of criminals. Guns in the hands of honest people would “even things out.” (Gun Mart)

"Knockout Game:" Lesson Learned

Marvell Weaver, a 17-year-old thug who thought the “knockout game” was a lot of fun, learned a hard lesson when he tried it on a concealed carrier. He walked up to a man at a bus stop and pushed his finger (pretending it was a gun) into his side, and got shot, since the guy had his own real gun, carried legally. He survived, but he will recuperate in prison for the next year. He said himself, that he “learned a hard lesson.” He had practiced the “knockout game” several times, whenever he was bored, which was a lot, without a problem (for him). But his luck ran out this time. With the sales of guns skyrocketing as Obama tries valiantly to stop it, practitioners of this game will run into more and more armed victims, and become victims themselves, as this kid did. Yes, he learned a “hard lesson,” and I hope it “takes.” For his own good. (Town Hall)

National ID Cards

Globalists in Europe are talking about requiring national ID cards in order to use social media. In other words, they want to take something that was absolutely free to use and make it something you must get a LICENSE to use. The power to license something is the power to CONTROL it. The power to say “no” or “yes,” at the whim of a bureaucrat or a politician. Where the hell do they GET these people, who want to take something FREE and make it something for which you must go :hat in hand” to somebody who should have no business being between you and something you want to do and be able to say, “yes or no,” and charge you MONEY to do it? There is always somebody out there who wants to limit your freedom to do as you wish, so long as it doesn't hurt somebody else. And who do they plan to HAVE this power? THEM, of course! And to make money from it. But the money is secondary. It's the POWER to tell you whether you can, or can't, at their whim. (Before It's News)

Killing Incentive

Becoming a member of the “Honor Society” has always been a goal of students in school, but students at the Plano, Texas Senior High School graduation (and in this society today, probably many others) were not allowed to wear the “stole” that included the emblem of the Honor Society. It's yet another example of society's ignorant effort to punish achievement and bring everybody to a lower standard. They say it's so those who didn't attain that honor wouldn't get their precious feelings hurt because they didn't work hard enough. It's an extension of the “no score sports” policy that is sweeping the nation. Can you imagine an auto race without a winner? How about a football game where no winner was declared? What the HELL would be the POINT of the players going out on the field, some of them to be seriously injured or even KILLED, and no winner? I would never get a "participation" trophy, because I would not participate in such a useless exercise.The whole purpose of these events it to find out who is the best, and the players, like those students, work HARD to be the winner. To eliminate it is to destroy achievement and eliminate the INCENTIVE to succeed. These policies can only reduce and, ultimately ELIMINATE excellence in this country, or anywhere else it is practiced. It's a LIBERAL practice, and liberals are PROVEN stupid! (The Blaze)

Ignorant Democrat Voters

It's no wonder we're all screwed up the way we are. About 50% of Democrat voters think Hillary should continue her run for president, even if she is indicted. I don't know if there is a law against a CRIMINAL becoming president (a CONVICTED criminal, anyway), but there should be. Hillary has committed so many crimes in her spotted career, it's hard to keep track of them all. I think somebody under a criminal INVESTIGATION should be barred from running for ANY office during the course of the investigation, but that's just me. I'm honest. The only problem is that, right behind her is a crazy old man who believes, against all evidence, that SOCIALISM is the way to go, economically. As with Obama selecting “Ol' Joe” as vice-president, as insurance against assassination, our choice on the Democrat side is one disaster or another. Hillary won't be the first criminal elected to the presidency (if she gets elected), but maybe will be the first KNOWN criminal to be elected. (The Blaze)

"Child Protectors" Overdo It

As usual. This happened in Sweden, but it could (and does) happen here. “Child Protectors” are the same, the world over. But it is kept quiet so we won't know about it. They stole this child because he was being home schooled. That, and ONLY that, was the reason, even if they recently added the fact that he has an unfilled cavity (ho0rrors!) and hadn't had a vaccination (really bad!), both “put-up accusations that could have been handled (if they're even true) without stealing the child and keeping him for what amounts to HALF his life up to now. They actually stopped an airplane from taking off to rip this child from his parents, and have now had SEVEN YEARS to “brainwash” him in their way of thinking. They didn't want him to be home schooled (which is legal in Sweden) because, without their brainwashing, they wouldn't be able to control him in later life. The “child protectors” took my son's two boys and kept them for THREE years, with no charges ever being filed against him. They scammed him out of money several times while they were in their “custody” and, even after they were returned, they charged him MORE money to “reimburse them” for the expense of their “incarceration.” We need to do something about this illegal and overbearing bunch. They SAY what they do is not criminal action, so the Constitution doesn't control their actions. But what they do constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment,” mostly of people (like my son) who are innocent of any wrongdoing. (World Net Daily)

Keeping Us Ignorant

Obama's best-known gun-running scheme is little known. There's a good reason for that. The liberal media won't talk about it, except to try and make light of it. Meanwhile, 69 people have been killed in individual murders, both in Mexico and America, using the guns he ran to the Mexican drug cartels. There have been 20 mass shootings using them. But you didn't hear about most of it, because they don't want you to know about it. It would be contrary to their narrative. Outside of that, look at Chicago, where the “gun laws” are as tight as they are anywhere. They're in the middle of a “shooting spree” that is attaining panic proportions. Meanwhile, the anti-gun fools are demanding we make more of the same useless laws that haven't had ANY effect on that gun violence. Every time somebody gets killed, they insist on making more of those ignorant laws, even before any of the facts are in. In one case, a man STABBED another man to death and the anti-gun fools were out instantly demanding more laws be made against guns. (Patriot Post)

"Pro-Gun or Pro-Life?"

The Record Searchlight asks the silly question, “Can you be pro-life and pro-gun?” Assuming that guns are ONLY for people to use to wrongfully kill people, which is silly of them. Guns are for SELF-DEFENSE, too. To keep a criminal from killing you or your family or friends. For keeping them alive. If that means shooting the “bad guy,” so be it. And the answer is, “Yes. You CAN be pro-life AND pro-gun.” If you're a THINKING person, not somebody who doesn't think it through before asking stupid questions. That's the anti-gun fool way: ask stupid questions of people who pay no attention to politics and get ignorant responses. (Record Searchlight)

Calif. Outlaws Free Speech

In addition to several really STUPID anti-gun laws, California passed a law to allow them to punish anybody who criticizes global warming. I will never go there again. And I will continue to criticize those stupid enough to believe that horse manure, including Obama and, screw California. I lived in that insane state for years, and I didn't notice how STUPID they were, because I, like a lot of Americans, was not paying much attention to politics at the time, to my loss. I completely missed the “Reagan Revolution.” But I finally got smart, after listening to Rush Limbaugh on my brother's front porch, one day. I noticed that, while he is brash and overbearing in some ways, he speaks the truth. I don't agree with all of his OPINIONS, but I've never caught him in a lie. To those who think I'm stupid for listening to him, I say, YOU are the stupid ones. He woke me up, and I've been staying awake ever since. Anybody who makes a law against ANYBODY'S OPINION must have taken an overdose of “stupid pills,” which are easily obtainable in California. (Eagle Rising)

They're Full of Dung

The media said he didn't really raise six million dollars for the vets, it was only 5.6 million, and still is running. Which means it will probably total MORE than 6 million before it's over. They said what money he did raise has not been distributed, and instead of hiding, he called a press conference and stood, with a bunch of vets behind him, and gave them a LIST of the organizations where the money went, and is still going, after asking them if they had their pads ready. It is this kind of thing that frightens them. The prospect of 4 years of this, maybe 8 years, with Trump proving them liars at every turn. Unlike mot politicians, he doesn't hide, or duck the questions. He comes right back and PROVES them liars. That scares them to death. (Washington Post)

Dangerous Technology

I'd be afraid to use a “smart gun” to defend myself because the “bad guy” could easily disable it and make it useless. Current technology to disable a drone, could just as easily disable a “smart gun” by interfering with the signal between the gun and the bracelet or other device it listens to when you ask it to shoot. And don't think there aren't some criminals or other “bad guys” out there smart enough to do it. Or buy it done by others who are, so they could use their illegally-gotten guns without opposition from honest, law-abiding people. If I had a “smart gun,” I'd always be afraid the “bad guy” I'm facing had such technology, which would then be the death of me. If you're smart, no matter what people like Obama and Sen. Feinstein, or that brain dead ex-representative who got her brains scrambled by a bullet, pass into law, never buy a “smart gun.” If that means getting your gun illegally, so be it,. The “Drone Defender” doesn't just work on drones. It can disrupt cell phone signals, and other kinds of signals, too, and that includes the signal between a “smart gun” and it's master device. Which makes it very unreliable as a self-defense item. You'd be smart to stay far away from them. (WBAY)

Sorry Folks!

Yesterday, my car broke down about 30 miles from home. I had to spend the rest of the day and part of today getting it towed and fixed. I could not get to my computers, so, no posts. I'm just one guy here, so if I'm not here, nothing gets done.

Obama Pays For Mexican Border

He slammed Trump for having the temerity to say Mexico is going to pay for his wall between the two countries, then he spends $75 million dollars to strengthen the southern border of MEXICO! This is the kind of “giving you the finger” thing Obama does on a regular basis. He KNOWS such things are going to spark opposition comment, but he does it anyway. At the same time he makes a speech where he takes credit for a “booming economy” that does not exist! He talks about the “lowering unemployment rate, while MILLIONS of Americans would dearly love to have a job, but have given up on looking, having lost faith in EVER finding another job. Meanwhile many go on unemployment and later of welfare, which is even MORE of a drain on the economy, about which Obama LIED. But then, we know he's a congenital LIAR, don't we? He's got plenty of money to secure MEXICO'S border, but NONE to secure OURS. (DailyCaller)

Not Virgins, It's Raisins

I've always wondered how a “religion” could promise a Muslim who died while committing an act of Jihad, 72 “virgins,” with whom they could frolic and screw for all of eternity while they REMAIN virgins. Imagine their surprise when they get to Paradise and they're told, “No, they mistranslated” a word. What you get is 72 RAISINS!” I can imagine their response: “What? I killed many people and died a horrible, painful death, for THIS? I'm sure bin Laden, himself a Muslim “scholar,” knew this, but maintained the lie to keep his deluded followers willing to kill themselves to get this reward after death. And I'm sure all other Muslim leaders knew this, and kept it quiet so their “soldiers” would still be willing to kill themselves for their “divine mission.” Who would kill themselves for 72 RAISINS? They still insist their “religion” is a “peaceful” one, while everything they do seems to involve violence. And I'm not talking about just Islamic terrorists.

So-called “peaceful” Muslims screw little boys, “marry” girls as young as SIX, and I'll guarantee you they use violence to keep these innocent CHILDREN “in line.” They are KNOWN to keep these boys chained to a bed for future screwing. Girls too, I would guess. They think it's okay to BEAT their wives if they don't obey every edict of the men in their lives. ANY Muslim man can beat a woman for showing so much as an ANKLE in public. And if you “disrespect them,” they want to KILL you. Their answer to EVERY slight, real or imagined, is to KILL. This is not members of a “peaceful religion." Part of their doctrine is that it's okay to LIE to promote Islam. And they make sure the Korans we get to see are “sanitized” so they can CLAIM they're not violent. I'd like to be able to read Arabic so I could see it in its ORIGINAL form. (World Net Daily)

Abolishing the Second Amendment

Donald Trump's spokesman says that's the ultimate goal of “gun control.” They know that, as long as it exists, they can never just take our guns and ban them, so they ultimately want to get rid of it. Hillary Clinton is the only politician who has actually come out and SAID it, that she'd like to abolish the Second Amendment (Talking out of both sides of her mouth, she also says she doesn't want to take away your guns). But, say it or not, that is the ultimate goal of the anti-gun fools. Forget that where gun laws are tightest, the black market in guns is the most brisk. They think they can magically stop violent crime by making guns magically disappear. That getting rid of guns is a “pipe dream” is something they'll never admit, but which we know. It's like putting toothpaste back in the tube, It can't be done. They learned that in Australia, where they essentially banned all guns after a nasty mass shooting, and the violent crime rate skyrocketed 300%. Great Britain, which has such severe penalties for just OWNING a gun, is now complaining about guns “hidden all over England.” You just can't stop human beings from defending themselves, and since all the “bad guys” have their ILLEGAL guns, they want guns, too, because guns are the best defense. (Mediaite)

"More Than A Little Mad!"

According to The Blaze, this story will make me “a little mad.” He's wrong. It made me MORE than a little mad. It made me want to go to Egypt and do some damage to the fools who did it. What did they do? They dragged an elderly Christian woman from her home, stripped her naked, after dragging her out of her home, probably beating her, too. This family has been subjected to persecution by Muslims ever since a man was ACCUSED of having an affair with a Muslim woman. Before this atrocity, they burned the homes of several Christians because they couldn't get to the accused, who had left the country. So they did all they could to hurt his family. These are the actions of “peaceful” Muslims. The act was committed by HUNDREDS of Muslims, but only SIX were apprehended and, according to the Egyptian President, they will be held responsible. How responsible they will be held is in question, knowing how Muslim men are coddled when they commit sexual assaults on women. He also said, she should “not be mad” about the assault. Now, THAT makes me VERY angry. That a mob would do such things to the FAMILY of a man ACCUSED of simply having an affair (probably consensual) with a Muslim woman, and the elderly victim shouldn't be mad?. Even if the charges are true, that's no reason to punish his family, who are not guilty of ANYTHING. (The Blaze)

Liberals Get It Wrong

What do liberals get wrong about guns? Answer: EVERYTHING. Their first mistake is blaming the guns, not the criminal HOLDING the gun. Their second mistake is taking away the right to self-defense from law-abiding people when the criminals never have any trouble getting their guns out of a back alley somewhere. They maintain the futile belief that a CRIMINAL, who obeys NO LAWS, will obey a law that says he can't be armed. They think delaying law-abiding people in getting their guns into operation when an ILLEGALLY-armed criminal attacks them is doing something that will keep “gun violence” from happening. That gun safes, trigger locks, and allowing people to carry guns concealed only if they're UNLOADED is “common sense.” It isn't. It's illogical. But they aren't smart enough to know that. Obama is allowing hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists to come here, under the FICTION that they're “refugees.” And he's paying their way, with OUR money. The fact that almost 100% of these “refugees” are Muslims seems to escape them. Soon, they will be on our streets, raping little girls, boys, and grown women, and killing people for not believing in THEIR "religion." It's coming, and we will need to have our own guns to defend ourselves against it, in addition to the everyday “gun crime” caused, not by law-abiding people, but by criminals. (Just common sense)

"Guns In Church"

In 2015, a “lone wolf” shooting in a church sparked calls for more useless gun laws by anti-gun fools, who used it as a means to raise more money. They're now wondering what can be done to stop fools from coming into churches and killing people. But they ignore the simplest solution: allowing concealed carriers to bring their guns along when they go to church. They did that in Colorado Springs, Colorado, a few years ago, when a man came in to shoot up the church. The concealed carrier who was in the crowd, shot him, preventing any more murders than had happened outside the church on his way in. The main problem is, potential mass killers KNOW that most churches are “no gun zones,” so it's unlikely there will be any guns there to oppose him, If there were, and it was known, he might decide not to do it. But they panic at the very thought of law-abiding people bringing their guns to church. They think there's no reason to have a gun in the church. Which shows how ignorant they are. In this place at least, pastors are allowed to be armed, but this one was not. The killer was not allowed to own a gun, but that didn't stop him from getting at least one. So it's unlikely more laws would have stopped him. (USCCA)

"Not Connecting the Dots"

Obama ordered the intelligence community to DELETE a lot of information from their database of suspected and proven terrorists. A database that contained “the dots” that allowed them to stay ahead of the Islamic terrorists. Then after the “Underwear Bomber” justr barely failed to blow up an airplane containing 200 innocent people because the bomb in his shorts failed, Obama criticized them for “not connecting the dots” and allowing that fool to get as close as he did to bringing that airplane down. That did a lot to destroy the morale of the intelligence community, who do the best job they can do against all Obama's interference. I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't many more attacks, due to Obama's interference with our intelligence people. It's hard to do a good job with your boss screwing you from behind. (World Net Daily)

"It Shall Not Be Named"

The anti-gun fools don't want children to even know guns exist. And they think that will stop kids from killing themselves through curiosity when they find a gun in their homes. And if you leave them where they can be found, you're contributing to that problem. They hate the NRA, but the NRA teaches people about properly securing guns to keep that from happening. And they train children (and parents) in the proper handling of guns, so the kids won't feel the curiosity that comes from knowing absolutely NOTHING about guns and what they are. Principally that they can be deadly, and are NOT “playthings.” The anti-gun fools continue to think that children should not even know guns exist, let alone understand the danger they can present. Which leads to the death of many. In Detroit, they have a real epidemic of children accidentally shooting themselves and others, because of that ignorance about guns. Now they're swearing to do something about it. What are they contemplating? They think it is a “public health issue.” The usual silly thinking. They think “child access prevention laws” will solve the problem. They don't even THINK about proper training for children (and parents). They maintain their “guns shall not even be named” policy, to the detriment of many children. (The Independent)

The Wrong Direction

The article linked here is anti-gun. It talks about “random gun violence” that goes unreported because it is mostly “gang-related.” That's code for “it will never be solved,” just as “mob related” used to mean. It blames “the easy availability of guns” for the problem, but ignores completely the fact that the guns used are ALL illegally owned and carried, usually by kids too young to be ALLOWED guns, in the first place. The shootings cited are NOT shootings done by LEGAL gun owners in defense of their lives and families as they defend themselves against these underage gang monsters, They emphasize the fact that the “reasons” for most of the shootings are unimportant, hoping to build an image of shootings in the general population (including legal gun owners) for trivial reasons. They fail to note that most of the offenders are too young to be able to figure out the difference between right and wrong, and are subject to the “gang culture,” which values “face” above all else, and are willing to kill for the most trivial slights, real or imagined. Adults and honest, law-abiding people are not subject to this culture. But, being “gun-haters,” they can't see this. All the violence cited here is done using ILLEGAL guns, not guns registered to their owners or that have gun locks or trigger locks. As usual, they're aiming in the wrong direction. (Tampa BayTimes)

Honoring Our Vets

On this day of mourning for the thousands of young men and women who gave their livers that we might remain a free nation, Obama goes around mouthing the platitudes that all presidents are expected to mouth on this day, while spending the rest of his time making rules that get more and more of these fine young people killed because they're not ALLOWED to fight back, effectively. He praises the dead, but his words are meaningless because he doesn't care. If he did, he wouldn't make “rules of combat” that inhibit their ability to fight effectively while the enemy beheads us, kidnaps our people, put them through hell, and ransom some if they can. He wouldn't be purposely reducing the numbers of military people and reducing military budgets to the bone. He goes about the world APOLOGIZING for the deeds that WON the wars we were forced to fight. He BOWS to kings and dictators all over the world. People we should be killing. He sends a message that, as long as he is in office, or has any effect on policy, we will NOT fight terrorism and despotism. He hates everything we stand for, and is working HARD to destroy everything those vets fought and died to accomplish. The sooner we rid ourselves of this menace, the better. It is good that the election is near, IF that does it. (Just common sense)

Blood On Obama's Hands

Obama is the worst serial killer ever! And that's a fact. He masterminded “Fast & furious,” which was supposed to be the same as Bush's scheme to find out where guns bought here went in Mexico that didn't work because the Mexicans found, and removed the GPS devices from the guns, so he stopped it. Then Obama did it again, this time not even bothering to put in GPS devices. What he hooped to accomplish, is strange. What he DID accomplish was 68 killings, in Mexico AND the U. S., and 20 MASS MURDERS. All that is blood on Obama's hands. This in ADDITION to the people who have died because of his other stupid policies. His stated goal was to point out the guns that were sold by U. S. gun stores and used in MEXICAN crime. To do so, he coerced U. S. gun stores to sell to “straw buyers” they ordinarily wouldn't even talk to. People they'd throw out of their stores. It was a scheme to paint the U. S. gun stores as selling guns that wound up doing Mexican crimes, so he could “strengthen gun laws” in the United States. It failed on all counts, because he was “found out” and his scam was publicized. Did that stop him? No. He may nor be selling guns to the Mexican drug lords any more, but he has never addressed the questions asked about it. No doubt the numbers would be even higher if we could depend on Mexican numbers, or get him to truthfully answer our questions. (Truth About Guns)

"No Guns, No Suicides!"

That's another lying myth promoted by the anti-gun fools. They think that someone determined to kill him/herself can't figure out a way to do it without a gun. How stupid ARE these people that they think we'll believe such pap? One recent such suicide attempt in Santiago where a man stripped naked and jumped into a lion cage in an attempt at suicide is a good example. It was foiled, and the man survived, though he was in “grave” condition at a local hospital. He was saved by the lions being—wait for it—SHOT by zoo keepers. They tried to tranquilize the lions, but managed to tranquilize him, instead. So they finally shot them to death. I hate that it had to go that way, because the lions weren't at fault. They were just being lions. But the whole point here is, that when fools want to kill themselves, they'll find a way, and lack of guns (if that were even possible) would not deter them. (The Sun)

Medicare Cuts Killing Seniors

Obama has just made an unconscionable change in Medicare. He is offering bonuses to hospitals that spend the LEAST on sick patients. So guess what? Hospitals are responding, and patients are dying for lack of good care. It's the VA all over again. Only in this case, they don't have trouble getting to SEE a doctor, they're having trouble getting the proper treatment, if it “costs too much.” It's Obama's “death panels” in operation. Only instead of having a bunch of bureaucrats denying seniors treatment, he's encouraging hospitals to do it for him. So he can still CLAIM not to HAVE “death panels.” If this edict had been in effect back in 2005, when I needed a quadruple bypass that cost $25,000.00, I wouldn't be here today, because some hospital administrator might have denied me that treatment, which no doubt kept me alive. (AMAC)

How About "Gunphobia?"

There are several organizations who want to stifle dissent to their plans who have come up with phony names for their critics. A couple of note are “Homophobia,” and “Islamaphobia.” It is their hope to paint their critics as somehow “mentally deficient” if they criticize them. I expect a new one to be created soon: “transgenderphobia,” to describe people who object to men in women's restrooms and changing rooms. Okay, so why can't the people who want to defend themselves against ILLEGAL gun owners, all of whom are thugs and criminals, have one of our own. Only this one is REAL. Anti-gun fools ARE “mentally deficient.” The only problem is that they have “wormed their way” into positions where they can make laws and rules to back up their mental aberration. The laws they make seem only to affect LEGAL gun owners, and ignore entirely the millions of ILLEGAL gun owners, who are really the problem. (Just common sense)

This Pope Is Senile

That's the problem with appointing very old people to important positions, such as that of the Pope. Maybe you get a “wise man,” maybe you get senility. I think, in the case of Pope Francis, you've got senility. I don't think he is naturally stupid, but he has shown a certain ignorance of reality in several of his pronouncements. His approval of communism and socialism, for instance. Nobody with any degree of intelligence, thinks there is anything good about socialism, communism, or any other form of collectivism. But he does, and I think it is a product of reduced thinking ability, which, at his age, can be senility. Catholics may be offended by this, and I apologize if they are. But it is something that must be said. Someone with a reduced capacity for intelligent thinking cannot be allowed to influence millions of followers.

This is not a condemnation of Catholicism. It is an effort to SAVE it from a senile Pope, whose ignorant pronouncements can do much damage. His most recent departure from reality is his saying that Muslims going out and KILLING those who won't “convert” to THEIR religion as being comparable to the peaceful proselytism of Jesus Christ. I don't think Jesus ever BEHEADED anybody in the name of God. Yes, certain representatives of Christianity, at one time, did commit atrocities in the name of God. But that was ended by “wiser heads” who intervened. There ARE no such “wiser heads” among Muslims. Or, if there are, they have not revealed themselves, lest they be killed, by the MEN who are running things right now. Christian teaching speaks of a “false prophet” who will arise in the “end times.” I think that prophet is Muhammed, the father of Islam. (World Net Daily)

She Did It, Too!

Elizabeth Warren, known as “Pocahontas” because she claimed Indian background to gain the benefits she could get by doing so, criticized Donald Trump for “profiting from the misery of others” for making money on foreclosures. All the time doing it herself. She made a bundle “flipping houses.” And yet she has the GALL to criticize Trump for doing it. Maybe she (and Hillary) thinks only DEMOCRATS should have the right to “profit on the misery of others.” Now Hillary is blaming the borrowers, that the lenders KNEW could not pay the mortgages back, when the fault lies with the Democrats, who passed the “Citizen's Reinvestment Act of 1976,” that FORCED lenders to make loans to people they KNEW could not repay them, or face action as a “redliner.” And Bill Clinton (her husband, strengthened it and made things worse during his administration. That's a typical liberal scam, accusing opponents of doing what YOU are doing. (The Blaze)

Why Not Shut It Down?

Islamic terrorism's magazine, “Inspire,” does just that. It “inspires” Muslims to KILL innocent people openly. Is there any other publication in America allowed to “inspire” crimes and stay in business? Yes, we have a free press. But to foment violence and murder doesn't qualify as “freedom of the press.” That would be like shouting “fire” in a crowded theater, just for fun. No matter where it is actually published. If it is published in a Muslim country, it still has to be SHIPPED here, and can be intercepted and stopped. Why isn't it? Are they afraid of Muslim retaliation? Or are they just too lazy to do anything about this abomination pretending to be a magazine? Nobody else is allowed to “counsel” murder and stay in business. We need to put these fools OUT of business. (AmmoLand)

Making Our Guns Useless

They can't just ban guns. The Constitution, which is the BASIS of all our laws, prohibits it. So what are fearful politicians to do? They can't have private citizens going around with guns in their pockets. That will make it more difficult for their thugs to victimize them. So what can they do? Idea! Make them useless by requiring them to be stored in such a way as to make them useless for defending against criminals (some wearing badges) who come to steal your property, using their own guns. Further, require “trigger locks”: and separate storage for guns and their bullets! If “concealed carry is allowed, require that the gun be UNLOADED. What the hell good does an UNLOADED gun do you:? What a STUPID requirement! That's a question they refuse to answer. The important thing to these frightened politicians is that an unloaded gun is USELESS to you in defending yourself, and that's what they want. They will have successfully “gotten around the Constitution.” (Just common sense)

He'll Never Make It!

They said Trump would never make it. He'd soon “fall by the wayside” as soon as he realized he had embarked upon an impossible quest. He didn't. Instead, one by one, all his competitors fell out while he kept winning primary after primary, until he was the only one left. Then they said he'd never get the necessary number of delegates to become the nominee, and would be shut out in the convention and someone they named, who had not received a single vote, would be selected by the Republican establishment. Then he got the “magic number” and one more for good measure, with several primaries remaining to add to his total. Many people, including some top politicians say, “he'll never get to be president.” These are the same people who said he'd “never get the nomination.” They've been wrong from day one. But they keep “whistling past the graveyard,” hoping against hope he will “come crashing down,” and he won't. They'll be wrong again. With nobody but a crooked grandmother who thinks the rules don't apply to her or an admitted socialist crazy man running against him in the general election, I think we're looking at our next president—if Obama doesn't pull some underhanded trick to stay in office forever. (Minutemen News)

Nunaya Damned Business!

They're telling doctors to ask you if you have guns, and how many you have. They think they have the right to do that. Of course, with the way Obama ignores our constitutional rights, they make “regulations” not backed by law, to do many things that are unconstitutional. So doctors questioning you about your guns will become common. What should also become common is to tell the doctor, “None of your damned business,” and refuse to answer. Or lie. The anti-gun fools say that “gun violence is a health issue, so doctors questioning patients about their guns is right and proper.” Which is a typical bunch of horse manure. Whether or not you have a gun at home is none of their business, and telling them to ask about it is the government's way of buttressing their already extensive database of gun owners so they can come and get them when they figure out how to do it. This article suggests you simply LIE to the doctor. Which works. But I believe it is NOT your doctor's business whether or not you have a gun in your house. And he has NO RIGHT to question you about it. (Hot Air)

Don't Elect A Dictator!

I wouldn't vote for Bernie Sanders on a bet. This is how dictators originally got their offices in other countries. Voted in by gullible people who wanted “free stuff,” and got a dictator. That's how Vladmir Lenin came to power, and ruined Russia for 75 years. It's how Adolph Hitler came to power, and he started WWII while enslaving Germany completely, and killed 6 million Jews. Then he tried to “take over the world.” Saddam Hussein was voted into power and became a dictator who had his opponents thrown alive off of roofs of buildings. Many other of today's despots began their despotism by being elected to office by people who just wanted “free stuff.” And Bernie appeals to those very people because he is an ADMITTED socialist. There's NO WAY I ever want to see this fool in the White House.

Obama is bad enough, and we may not survive HIS presidency as a free nation. He promised to “fundamentally change this nation” and he has kept that promise. He has changed it from a free market nation that is the “destination of choice” for people from all over the world who want to better themselves, to a SOCIALIST nation people will RUN away from. He hasn't finished the job yet, and rumor is, he will work some sort of a scam to stay in power after Jan. 20, 2017. Even if he doesn't, electing EITHER Bernie of Hillary is tantamount to a third year of Obama. I don't know if Trump is the answer, but he is certainly better than either Bernie or Hillary. I hope there are enough people left who are not looking for “freebies” to elect him.

Obama, Hillary, and Bernie tell us the capitalist system is wrong, and should be replaced by socialism (or some other form of collectivism), but everywhere collectivism (socialism, communism, Fascism, progressivism, etc.) has been used, it has failed. If it hasn't collapsed completely as it has in Venezuela, it muddles along on the WELFARE paid by other socialist countries that have not yet gone “belly up.” Such as Cuba, where the average age of the cars in use there is the FIFTIES, because they can't afford better cars—except for Castro and his accomplices. The “government people” in collectivist countries always get the best available. Meanwhile, their infrastructure is crumbling, after their chief communist sponsor, Russia, collapsed.

The word capitalism is used as an insult to the system of free market activity that has made this country, in about 300 years, SURPASS anything other countries that have been around for THOUSANDS of years have been able to accomplish. They can't find ANYTHING to recommend collectivism, but they continue to promote it, because it gives them POWER. With power comes PERKS, which they covet. Such people think they're better than the rest of us, but they're not. If they were, they wouldn't be promoting a system that is BASED on THEFT from the producer of new wealth, for the benefit of those who don't, for whatever reason, produce new wealth, themselves. (The Blaze)

Censorship In Canada

Canada doesn't have a First Amendment. So soon, if you say anything “bad” about transgenders” going into women's private places, like bathrooms and changing rooms, you can get TWO YEARS in prison. Trudeau is working HARD to get this law passed. They're trying to pass a law banning negative talk about many things, including transgenderism, and violating this law can get you 2 years in PRISON, fort speaking out of turn. And don't think Obama is not eying this with interest. Such a law in the United States would be a patent violation of the Constitution, but Obama has proven he doesn't give a damn about that. I'm sure it will be thrown out by the Supreme Court eventually, but there's no telling how many people will be victimized by it before that happens. Such laws should be FORCED to undergo a Court review of their constitutionality BEFORE being enforced. But that's not how we operate, and Obama uses that to his advantage, since there is NO PENALTY for a politician violating the Constitution, except to eventually have his law reversed. (Before It's News)

Typical Racist Horse Manure

Since Obama started calling EVERYTHING that was against what he wanted “racist,” his acolytes are taking a tip from him and calling THEIR opposition racist. Virginia Senator Tim Kayne (Democrat, of course) is saying that the only reason Obama's Supreme court appointment is not being taken up by the Senate is because Obama is black. What STUPIDITY that displays! This appointment isn't being voted on because if it goes through, there will be a liberal MAJORITY on the Court, which will screw things up for GENERATIONS. This senator's statement is a “cheap shot” and goes right along with OBAMA'S “cheap shots” of a similar nature. Obama said that if we elected him, it would forever END racism in this country. On the contrary, it has made it WORSE, mostly because Obama has used racism to ostracize people who oppose, or disagree with his STUPID policies. I don't give a damn if he is white, black, or PURPLE with pink polka-dots! His policies are dangerously stupid, and they can call me racist all they want, and that doesn't change it. Nor does it matter to me. (Daily Caller)

BC

No Guns, Now Pot

San Francisco's last gun shop is closing. And it's being replaced by a “pot shop.” Apparently, the restrictions on selling pot aren't as “draconian” as they are on selling guns. So now, instead of selling guns to legal gun buyers, it will sell POT to misguided kids who just want to get high, and will STEAL the money to buy it if they don't have it. They CALL it “medicinal pot," but how many kids who want to get high will “come up with” medical excuses to buy it? How they figure this improves the safety of San Francisco residents is a mystery—to everybody EXCEPT the liberal fools running things in that city. Now the cops and security agencies that offer armed security will have to go outside SF to get their guns, and bring them right back into SF. Meanwhile, CRIMINALS will go to the same ILLEGAL gun seller in a back alley somewhere (in SF), and buy their guns out of the trunk of his car (or steal them), since he is not affected by this misguided situation fostered by anti-gun FOOLS. (NY Daily News)

Baltimore Waking Up

They're finally figuring out they have a way too officious prosecutor who RAN to charge six cops in the accidental death of a prisoner in custody, without considering the consequences. She just “went along with the crowd” of fools who quickly “bought” the scam Freddy Gray was selling, that the cops were “assaulting him.” When he banged his head against the wall of the wagon as he was being taken to jail, he forgot his very recent spinal surgery, and it killed him. Too bad for him. But it wasn't the actions of the cops that were at fault. Without considering that possibility, Marilyn Mosby filed charges against the cops without sufficient evidence (which there was none), who were doing their job, and doing it well. She has screwed up the lives of those cops royally, and it has now been realized. Charges should be filed against HER. Or she should at least lose her job and be disbarred. She is being "looked at" for investigation for overreaching her powers. (Mail News)

Flouting the Second Amendment

That's what Washington, DC does on a regular basis. Therefore, they get “slapped down” by the Supreme Court, also on a regular basis. In 2008, the Court struck down a COMPLETE BAN on citizens owning guns in DC as unconstitutional. After that, they enforced a ban on carrying firearms in public, until the Court, in 2014, struck THAT down. They just never learn. And this is the place where ALL our laws are made, and they should know better. But they apparently don't. The anti-gun fools criticize the NRA, which is the most instrumental organization in the country protecting our Second Amendment rights, FOR doing so. They try every scam they can to discredit the NRA, but, so far, they haven't made it. Next, they required citizens to have a “specific reason” to want a “license to carry,” which functioned as an almost complete ban on new gun carry licenses. They're like that game where you hit a figure in one hole with a hammer, and he pops up in a different hole, almost immediately. Shut them down in one scam, and they immediately come up with another. Limiting the law abiding on carrying guns does NOTHING to reduce gun violence, all of which is committed by CRIMINALS, who don't OBEY laws. But they'll never learn that, and will continue their efforts to “get around” the prohibition on banning gun rights that is so simple, and prominent in the Constitution. (NRA-ILA)

False Prophet

I'm not big on organized religion. I do believe in a supreme being somewhere in this (or another) universe that ORGANIZED this complicated universe. I'd be a fool not to when I look at how well organized this universe is. But I'm just not sure He/She/It is anything like ANY form given by the MEN who have created all the religions in this world. But I'm increasingly aware of some of the Christian prophecies coming true, in my lifetime. One major prophecy I see coming true right now is the “false prophet." I think we can now name him, and his name is Mohammed. The religion he started, and which has grown at an amazing pace because it is promoted as a religion to which if you don't subscribe, they wish to put you to death. The things this religion preaches are EVIL. They enslave their women, and want to KILL you for the slightest imagined slight. They think their (peaceful) religion is the ONLY religion on the face of the Earth that is right, and if you don't accept that, they'll KILL you. They'll want to kill ME for writing this. But if I can be killed for telling the truth, life is not worth living. And I'm old enough to know my time is near, anyway. (Just common sense)

Wiser Head Speaks

In Baltimore, a judge declared officer Edward Nero, the second of the six cops charged falsely in the death of Freddie Gray, NOT GUILTY. The judge questioned the assertion that, to arrest Grey without probable cause, amounted to assault. The whole idea that those six cops were guilty of murder because they didn't attach Gray's seat belt in the wagon is absurd. And the only reason he died is because he tried to incriminate those cops by hitting his head against a wall several times. Unfortunately, he had had back surgery recently, and THAT was what caused his death. Not the actions of the cops. The local state's attorney, Marilyn Mosby, who obviously has a hate for cops, falsely charged the cops. Another of the six, William Porter, got a mistrial after the jury could not arrive at a verdict. That, and this result, should send a signal to the fools that charged these cops with murder when the victim killed himself by accident, while trying to incriminate the cops who arrested him. This entire case is the outcome of the “Ferguson Effect,” where cops are criminally blamed for doing their jobs. If any of the remaining cops are convicted, it will be a massive miscarriage of justice. In Ferguson, MO, the cop was innocent of any wrongdoing, but lost his job anyway, and his life was ruined. It's too bad that huge young thug was killed, but when you try to kill a cop, that's a likely outcome. (WTVR 6)