A Country In Decline

I hate to say it, as much as I hate to LIVE it. But Obama has kept one promise: to “fundamentally change this country.” and he has. He has moved us inexorably closer to socialism, reduced our ability to repulse attacks on our sovereignty significantly by making large and inadvisable cuts in our military budgets, which will, and HAVE made us UNABLE to mount a significant defense if attacked from more than one direction at once. There is no better evidence of this than the military airplanes and helicopters that are sitting idle on the ground for lack of parts to make them airworthy while their pilots don't get enough flying time for lack of enough flyable aircraft, to maintain their own airworthiness. Every decision these days has, at its base, radical liberalism. He has gotten us into $19 BILLION dollars of debt, which our children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and their descendants will be unable ever to pay. (Just common sense)

No, We're NOT!

The writer of the article linked here says, “Americans are being duped by the NRA.” Actually, we're NOT. The NRA teaches gun safety courses, and courses on safe gun handling and storage. They teach kids about guns, emphasizing the fact that they're NOT TOYS, and not to be “played with,” which has saved many kid's lives—which the usual “an item that shall not be named” policy of anti-gun fools does not. In fact, that policy INCREASES the killing of one child by another, who, without instruction, doesn't understand that a real gun is not a CAP gun. And they spend a lot of time and money opposing the UNCONSTITUTIONAL efforts of anti-gun fool politicians to make existing guns USELESS, since they can't just BAN them. Politicians are constantly trying to “get around” this constitutional prohibition on DISARMING the populace, and this article is just one such effort. While the NRA isn't the only organization to oppose them, it is the most influential—which is why the anti-gun fools try so hard to discredit them. (The Guardian)

What the Hell?

I thought the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States PROHIBITED banning discussion over unproven allegations. Yet, in Portland (Oregon or Maine, I don't know. They didn't say), the School Board is banning any negative information about global warming (now called, “climate change”) in textbooks. They say, “Man is causing climate change, no question about it.” which is an outright LIE. There IS a “question about it,” which they can't answer. Which is why they want to stifle opposition. It's complete arrogance to think that man could have ANY effect on climate change, and there is no REAL EVIDENCE otherwise. Only “computer models.” They KNOW they can't intelligently answer questions about it, so they just want to eliminate information contrary to their OPINIONS, altogether, by “law.” That's the liberal way. (Zero Hedge)

Socialism's End Result

We keep telling people that the “end result” of socialism is collapse, and they don't believe us. Chiefly because the socialists in charge of such collapses deny socialism was, in any way, responsible. But the current collapse in Venezuela IS from socialism, and they can't truthfully deny it. Their socialism is so well known there that denying it is futile. People are FIGHTING over what food is left. There is no toilet paper in all of Venezuela and trees are being stripped of their leaves as a substitute. Maybe they'll start using pictures of the Venezuelan president. Hamburgers cost $175.00! Chese added is another $10.00.The “final straw” came when they announced that they had “run out of money to print money!” Children are dying for lack of medicine, medical care, and food. But there will still be people who tout the “advantages” of socialism. Some “ideas” never die, even after being PROVEN to be a disaster. There will always be people stupid enough to promote them, anyway, and others to believe them. (Before It's News)

Anti-Gun Round Table

Gabby Giffords, the former congresswoman who got her brains scrambled by a gunman some time ago, is hosting a “round table” on “gun control” in heavily anti-gun Los Angeles. Likely they will discuss the same tired, old, USELESS gun laws that are being made all over the country, which not only do NOTHING to “reduce gun violence,” but in fact, INCREASE it. Their minds are “set in stone” that these useless laws work, in spite of SURE EVIDENCE that they don't. She holds “round tables” and other kinds of meetings, all over the country, but she can't show a single percent REDUCTION in “gun violence” as a result of these meetings. But she feels like she's actually DOING something. It's nice to have a goal in life, even if it's a futile one, and wrong. And it will be futile until they get smart and come up with something REAL in place of their USELESS gun laws. I'm not holding my breath until they do. (CBS)

TSA Is Incompetent

Some call it the “Tough Sh-t Agency.” And they're mostly right. They have proven themselves to be sloppy and incompetent. They spend their time “feeling up” people and making outrageous “rules” on what can be taken on a plane, which do NOTHING to stop a terrorist from boarding. They search 90-year-old crippled women and infants thoroughly, but allow obvious Muslims to go aboard with a minimum of searching, so they won''t “offend” one of the easiest offended bunch around. They have many people whose names are on their “no fly lists” working FOR them. They PURPOSELY maintain smaller numbers of “searchers” than they need so they can con more money out of Congress to be able to hire more. And it's working. They panic easily. They're afraid of their shadows, and react violently if someone so much as SAYS certain words, such as “terrorist,” “bomb,” or some such. The slightest opposition to their invasive activities brings down a swarm of TSA agents to stop it. They have plenty of agents walking around doing nothing for that. They SAY their problems are the result of “budget cuts,” something that hasn't happened to them recently. That's always the excuse used when a government agency gets in trouble. Happy three hour waits, folks! (Constitution)

Unpopular Candidate?

They say Donald Trump is “one of the most unpopular candidates in memory.” Why then, does he keep winning primary after primary (whatever they call them), and draw the biggest crowds of any candidate, on either side? I think the Republican “establishment” is “whistling past the graveyard” in hopes enough people will believe that, so they'll vote for someone else. They keep saying he's “behind Hillary,” who is also unpopular, though we know why she is leading—the Democrats have it “fixed” so she will, no matter how many primaries Bernie wins. But to compare the two is like “apples and oranges.” She doesn't have the Democrat “establishment” against her. The Republicans don't want Trump because they won't be able to control him by withholding funds, and he has PROMISED to “upset many applecarts.” Whether or not he will be a good president is still to be answered. But he CAN'T be a worse president than Obama has been. There isn't such an animal! (Weekly Standard)

Now That's REAL Racism!

The Seattle Times had a piece by a black man, if you can believe that, which was billed as saying “black men should not get guns.” Now, that's REAL racism. Not the phony kind put out by Obama, his thugs, and his followers. Not the kind represented by the “Black Lives Matter” movement, which gets very angry when someone corrects that to read “ALL Lives Matter.” This article bemoans the “fact” that so many guns used in gun crimes are stolen, as if it's OUR fault thugs steal our guns. They cite a figure that a large percentage of people are shot by kids FIVE and under, as if what they call “easy access to guns” was at fault, instead of the action of anti-gun fools to make guns a word “that shall not be spoken” to kids, so they'll always be enthralled if they find a gun at home and play with it as if it were a toy. If the people whose guns were stolen had attended a NRA “gun safety” class, they'd KNOW that keeping information about guns from their children PROMOTES their use by young children to ACCIDENTALLY kill each other. That if they learned proper gun handling and storage, their guns would not be so easily stolen. You can't “reduce gun violence” by hiding their very existence and being sloppy in their storage at home. But these fools will never know that. Their minds are solidly CLOSED to common sense, although they label their USELESS laws as “common sense gun laws.” (Seattle Times)

What's Good About Socialism?

Answer: NOTHING! Socialism, and all other forms of collectivism, communism, progressivism, Fascism, etc.) are BASED on THEFT from the producer of new wealth, for the benefit of those who, for whatever reason (usually laziness) do not produce any new wealth, themselves. This motto, put out by Karl Marx, the “father of communism,” tells it all: “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED.” Making “need” a demand upon the EARNINGS of the producers, without payment for that stolen. There is a single reason why collectivism is so popular. That's because so many people just want a “free ride,” at the expense of others. They don't care how much it costs, as long as somebody else is paying for it. The number of people in that category is increasing, every day. Mostly because they're TAUGHT that, in school, at all levels.

Especially in colleges, which have literally been “taken over” by liberals, who daily preach socialism and it's “benefits.” That those “benefits” are only available to the lazy is not mentioned. It was just beginning when I went to school, but I still remember the emphasis on “sharing” above all else. Marx caused a nation (Russia) to suffer for 75 years from his version of collectivism, communism, before it predictably collapses, since no form of collectivism produces ANY new wealth. It only sucks off those who DO produce, without remuneration—until they “get wise” and stop producing when they figure out they're only supporting those who will not work and support themselves. Collectivism NEEDS producers, so they can steal what they earn for the benefit of others. When the producers find out they're supporting the lazy, and get penalized for it, they stop producing, and the system collapses, as it did in Russia, and is now doing in Venezuela.

There are three kinds of people in this world: The producers, the moochers, and the looters, who steal it for them. The looters are the politicians who tax the producers unmercifully, and give that stolen to the moochers. Soon the moochers think it is their due, and demand more. Which the looters willingly steal for them, so they'll get the votes they need to stay in office, where they can loot even more, for the moochers, and themselves. They say they're not interested in money, but they're lying. You don't need to OWN the money if you CONTROL, absolutely, how it is distributed, and to whom. Then you “get the perks” money can buy, without owning it. Plus, you get treated like a king or queen. Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama are today's looters, and they need to be BANISHED, forever from political office. In the upcoming election (2016), I sincerely hope there are enough producers to outnumber the moochers, so they will not again elect the looters to office, so they can victimize us again. (This article first appeared on iPatriot)

The Truth Comes Out

The liberal media keeps saying that the Republican Party is severely fractured, while the Democrats are united. They'd like us to believe that, but, as with most liberal assurances, it is NOT true. Yes, there are a few Republicans who don't like their presumptive nominee, Donald Trump. But Trump has risen above that, and I believe he will not only be a viable candidate, I think he will win, probably in a landslide. Remember: whenever the PEOPLE get to have their say, he wins. When the Republican “establishment” have their say, he loses. So that pretty much tells you where the “fracturing” is. In the Democrat Party, Hillary and Bernie loyalists recently got into a violent confrontation at a local Democrat meeting. This was NOT a fight between voters and the “establishment,” it was between voters loyal to one or the other candidates. This is NOT “party unity.” so don't believe the horse manure they spout. (The Blaze)

Penis Transplant

Many men who are less endowed than they'd like to be have wondered if it was possible to add a couple of inches to their penis, and if it would then work. It now appears that this would, indeed be possible. If they can transplant a penis from a cadaver to a live person, and the penis will eventually do everything it's supposed to do, even engage in sex, they could certainly graft a penis (or part of one) onto an existing penis, with it eventually being able to perform all functions of an unaltered penis. This discovery should be instrumental in starting another massive enterprise, as the discovery that Viagra could help people with erectile dysfunction to be able to get, and keep erections. There will soon be long lines at penile surgery centers, wishing to enhance their endowment. I guarantee it. (The Blaze)

Mass Stupidity

I can't believe how many stupid people there are in this country. If the people who just want a “free ride” at somebody else's expense are sufficiently numerous to elect either Hillary or Bernie president, we're done. But they don't care, as long as they get their “freebies.” the fact that they will have condemned all of us to generations of hardship doesn't matter to them. All they want it their “stuff.” I could understand Bernie drawing such big crowds (although they're dwarfed by Trump's crowds), if he hadn't ADMITTED to being socialist. There was a time when an admitted socialist wouldn't have gotten NEAR a presidential nomination in a “mainstream political party.” But no more. Ever since our education system was “taken over” by liberals, our impressionable kids have been brainwashed that socialism is great, although it isn't. So it's no mystery to me how the “freebie hounds” have gotten so near outnumbering honest, working people. (Just common sense)

Teaching Kids About Guns

In many places, they are teaching kids as young as NINE about guns, and actually letting them SHOOT them. HORRORS! Some newspapers are “:having a cow “ over this. Everybody knows youngsters often find guns at home, and in their ignorance shoot each other or themselves. So we should keep gun knowledge from them as long as possible. That's what anti-gun fools think and say. But why DO kids shoot each other and themselves so often? Because they know nothing ABOUT guns, by design! And, to them, they're often considered playthings, like cap guns, which have now almost disappeared from toy store shelves. But if they were TAUGHT about guns, and taught gun safety, that might not happen. They might then respect a gun as the dangerous instrument it can be, and not “play with it.” Hiding gun information from kids promotes killings, through ignorance. One of the things the NRA is big on is teaching gun safety, as well as safe gun handling. But anti-gun fools want to pretend guns don't exist for kids. And that gets many of them killed. (The Guardian)

Damned Fool Obama!

He's not a fool in how he is running his government, everything he does is calculated to weaken America and make it easier for our enemies to come here and kill us. But where he IS a damned fool is the many pronouncements he makes publicly, thinking we'll BELIEVE them, in spite of the evidence of our eyes, and our lives. He tells the 96 million unemployed, most of which have GIVEN UP on ever finding another decent job, that he has brought unemployment down to 5%, when we KNOW that is A LIE! But he DARES us to disbelieve him. Now he's telling us confidently that, “By almost every measure, the world is in better shape than it was 8 years ago (when his eminence took office)..” That is so laughable I hurt myself when I heard it. It took me a long time to stop laughing long enough to write this. The country is on the verge of national bankruptcy, to join all the formerly solid businesses that have had to declare bankruptcy since he screwed them. He has promoted the latest incredible increase in the minimum wage, which has resulted in hundreds of businesses going out of business, and their employees having no jobs at all. Meanwhile, his thugs are bullying people to allow MEN in women's bathrooms and changing rooms to divert our attention from reality. (CNS News)

Muslim "Refugee" Rapists

This is the story of a German girl who was sexually assaulted by Muslim “refugees” several times, and decided to do something about it. She learned unarmed combat and, when next a Muslim “refugee” tried to sexually assault her, she gave him a “beat down” he didn't expect, and he ran away from her. In the previous sexual assaults a female cop told her it wasn't worth a complaint, because she couldn't name her attacker. Come on! Isn't that the JOB of the cops? To FIND OUT who attacked her and, even if they couldn't pronounce any of his names (they all have several, to confuse us), prosecute him if she visually identifies him? They're just not doing their job. I think it's because they fear reprisals from the Muslims. Some are on the SIDE of the Muslims. (Freedom Outpost)

Couric Is Deluded

She is now saying that, “The claim that armed good guys can stop bad guys is a specious argument.” Is it? Then why are there so many stories in non-liberal news sources on it happening, every day? In Chicago recently, with it's very tight “gun laws,” an ILLEGALLY-armed thug was robbing a convenience store and threatening a clerk with death when a LEGALLY armed customer shot HIM to death. Specious argument, huh? Maybe you oughta do a little honest research, for a change, Katie. Then maybe you'd know the truth, and stop telling LIES. There are stories like that in the news every day. Just not in the places YOU read. They're in HONEST news sources, which you DON'T read. Wake up to reality, Katie. You're supposed to know of what you speak, and you're miserably ignorant. (Breitbart)

Moore Plays "Race Card"

It's almost REQUIRED today for liberals (which Michael Moore definitely is) to attribute everything under the sun to racism, whether or not there is any EVIDENCE to support it. Lack of evidence has never been an impediment to liberals. When they want to make you think something, they just SAY IT, and see to it that as many of their liberal friends repeat it, as possible. Then they call attention to the many people saying the same thing as proof of authenticity (circular reasoning). Moore is now saying that the flint pollution problem is because of racism, not the fault of incompetent people (liberals) in charge. It's a good way these days, to obfuscate the issue. They blame racism for many things that are NOT because of racism, but ARE because of incompetent liberals in charge. Such as all the cities that are in “money trouble.” every one of them are RUN by liberals. Don't take my word for ir, check it for yourself. That's what the Internet is for. Just be sure of your source. (Brad Wilmouth)

They Lied to America

Obama adviser Ben Rhoades came right out and confessed: “We lied to America to get the Iran deal through. If we hadn't, it would never have made it (paraphrased).” Which is just one more bit of evidence that the Obama administration is made up of a “web of lies.” They also lied to get Obamacare passed. That fact was testified to by Professor Jonathan Gruber. Worse, he actually SAID “We lied to the gullible Americans to get it passed into law.” This is what his people DO, led by Obama, himself. He not only lies, he makes up OUTRAGEOUS LIES he KNOWS we will not believe, and tells them with a straight face. And he does it daily. One notable Obama lie is the one where he tells us the economy is “okay,” when we KNOW it is NOT, from personal experience. Especially if we are part of the 96 million people who are unemployed, with no hope of ever getting another job and have thus, left the work force. He doesn't count us any more, which is where he gets the ridiculous 5% unemployment figure he touts so proudly. Obama and his goons have been conning the country since he crawled out from under his Chicago rock to elbow Hillary aside in 2008. (The Federalist)

NY Times Lies

The article linked here is sheer horse manure. But it was presented as truth by the NY Times, the newspaper that calls itself, “The Newspaper of Record.” It's all lies, and the main subject int the story never said what they say she said, in the way they told us she said it. She later went on Fox News and said that NYT “twisted her words” to do a “hit piece” on Donald Trump after telling her it would NOT be a "hit piece.". She told us what the NYT reported “NEVER HAPPENED, that Trump was always a PERFECT GENTLEMAN.. with her.” If this is the kind of thing the NYT reports, and in that way, it's no wonder they're losing readers every day, and their time is short. I don't know how many years they have left (if any) before they go bankrupt, but their time is definitely coming. You can't continue to blatantly lie to your readers and keep them today. There are too many places capable of bringing out the truth. They blame their woes on “changing markets,” but theirs is accelerated by their lies. (NY Times)

"The New Jim Crow"

That's horse manure, but that's how the liberals describe our objections to Obama's STUPID letter to local school districts, ORDERING them to allow boys and men into women's restrooms, so they can ogle the naked bodies of teenagers, and even sexually abuse them in their own restrooms and changing rooms. That he has NO AUTHORITY to do such a thing is obfuscated in the liberal media. Since he has no right to send such an order, he is ILLEGALLY using the withholding of millions of dollars in funds WE sent to Washington so he could “get his cut” and send the rest back. It's OUR money, not his, but he is using it to BULLY the local school districts to do something that is patently a perversion. Of course, this whole thing is an effort to divert our attention from the two socialists running in the presidential election campaign, as well as the other OUTRAGES he is promoting. (Christine Marsh)

"Dirty Secret" Revealed

Did you see the story about the “bomb” found in a soccer stadium that caused the cops to stop the game while they disarmed it? It happened in Manchester, England. What they didn't tell you is that the “bomb” was a PHONY bomb left there by the “authorities” after a recent practice exercise. If we keep this up, the terrorists have WON. They won't need to blow anything up, or kill anybody. We'll terrorize ourselves. They've already been responsible for creating a giant bureaucracy in America, the one designed to humiliate everybody at airports by having to submit to being “felt up” before being allowed on an airplane. Of course, that's what we get when we let the incompetent “authorities” run things. They have no idea what they're doing, and thus screw things up like Hogan's goat. In this case, they only inconvenienced thousands of people in one day. There's no telling how they'll screw other things up in their fevered quest to keep terrorists from successfully attacking us. Their incompetence is amazing. (The Blaze)

Parsing Words

That's how liberals obfuscate the facts. George Stephanopolous said Hillary “turned over all the e-mails that were in her possession.” But there were thousands more that were NOT “in her possession” because she got rid of them before turning in any. So George didn't lie, he just told it in such a way as to give us a wrong impression. That's how they do it. Liberals have perfected the art of obfuscating reality and promoting pipe dreams. Most of the things they promote ARE “pipe dreams.” Of course, they insist that they're NOT pipe dreams, but THAT'S a pipe dream. They will criticize me for saying this, so as to obfuscate what I say. Maybe it will work, maybe it won't. They're losing today, because we're getting more information about them than we used to, when they CONTROLLED the dissemination of information. But with the advent of such people as Rush Limbaugh, and the rise of Fox News, they can no longer control the dissemination of news, and lie to us, undetected by the majority who pay attention. Those who DON'T pay attention, however, are another story. (News Busters)

Coverup Begins

Those of us who look outside the liberal news media for our news because we know it lies, and withholds vital information know all about Facebook's attempts at censorship of conservatives. But the liberal media REFUSES to say anything about it, so the liberals can say “It didn't happen because it was never in the news.” Never in the news THEY read anyway. But it DID happen, just as the IRS “dragged their feet” on approving the tax exempt status for conservative organizations, and they didn't cover that, either. That's how they “manage” the news. By emphasizing negative stories about non-liberal figures like the story about Trump's “abusive” relationship with a woman that turned out to be NOT an abusive relationship.

It was only reported that way by the NY Times. Then they ignore other stories that might destroy the liberal narrative. They've been doing this for many years, and it was undetected by everybody but those conservatives affected. But they had no way to let people know. Now, more and more it is becoming evident, since there is a large, and increasingly evident “alternative” news media that is gaining notice in the mainstream, to report it. Liberals hate that, and take every opportunity to disparage it's representatives, such as Fox News, which tells the truth about them, and tells BOTH SIDES of the stories they report. This is something the liberal media does NOT do. They hate Fox News because it exposes their perfidy. (Media ResearchCenter)

Why Don't They Learn?

Anti-gun fools are never deterred in their quest to DISARM the American people when the laws the get passed cause death and destruction by taking guns away from HONEST people, leaving the way wide open for CRIMINALS, who obey NO laws, to victimize them with their ILLEGAL guns. Surely, they're not that ignorant or stupid. There must be another reason why they ignore common sense in the laws they get passed in SPITE of sure proof they pass USELESS laws. That purpose is clear to me. They want to eventually come for what's yours, and they don't want you to be able to repulse them when they do. That's the ONLY reason I can see for taking your guns away, in opposition to the constitutional guarantee that we have a RIGHT to be armed. They refuse to see that their laws are USELESS in reducing gun violence because that's not their intention, at all. That's their story and they're “stickin' to it. (Just common sense)

They Didn't Know

This article says, “If Hillary becomes commander-in-chief, half the military will get out.” then they ask the cryptic question, “Why didn't they get out when Obama got elected?” The answer is simple: they didn't know he was the disaster he is. Now it wouldn't do any good to leave HIS military. But it's not too late to get out of HILLARY'S military. She has a record already, of leaving them to DIE when they get attacked. They thought they were safe when she got fired as Secretary of State. But Obama has done equally stupid things. It figures that, now they know what they will be up against, they don't want to die of her ignorance and stupidity. Of course, they won't have to just quit. Obama will fire them in his quest to CRIPPLE our military, and thus our country. He doesn't think this country was EVER great. But it has only NOT been great since he took office, because of his rhetoric. (Breitbart)

It's Always the Gun

Whenever a “crazy” shoots up a school, or somewhere else guns are banned, they blame the GUN, not the man. They come out and demand that more of the same useless “gun laws” that have been made for years by short-sighted people who can't think straight have been making. Politicians listen, and then go out and make more useless laws that do nothing but make “sitting ducks” of innocent citizens who then have no defense, and soon some other idiot goes out and gets a gun in one of many ILLEGAL ways, and goes on a shooting spree. Then somebody closely connected with somebody in the shooting demands more of those useless laws, and get them. Then it happens again. And again. And again. In the recent Oregon shooting it is the father of the shooter who is demanding more of the same, useless laws. In the case of Gabby Giffords (after Jared Laughner scrambled her brains with a bullet in Arizona) she even started her own anti-gun organization with the help of her ex-astronaut husband, to demand more useless gun laws.

There have been many other examples, but I won't bore you with them. Suffice it to say, ALL of them have set their sights on the GUN, which is an “easy target,” but which is not at fault. Without the hand of a fool pulling the trigger, a gun can't harm ANYBODY. But NOBODY ever suggests punishing the USE of a gun in a crime. It's ALWAYS the gun. What to do about the “crazies” is another question, to which I don't think there is an answer. Making LAWS against gun ownership is useless,. They ALWAYS get their guns. No matter what laws you make, they WILL always get their guns. They need to simply TAKE NOTICE when such a crazy “sends up a signal” that he/she is thinking about killing a bunch of people, as most of them do, and make some laws that allow the “authorities” to do something about them BEFORE they kill a bunch of people. The real solution is to allow honest people to be armed and to defend themselves. Maybe then such crazies would be shot, themselves before they could kill as many people. But the “anti-gun fools” won't even entertain that idea. (The Blaze)

"Shot Across Our Bow"

The ongoing controversy over letting MEN use women's bathrooms and changing rooms is being done for a reason. It's a “shot across the bow” of America to see how much crap we'll take. If we “suck it up: and let him get away with this most recent outrage, he'll know he (or his successor if liberal) can really “put the screws to us” and we'll just TAKE IT. What we need to do is send a “shot across HIS bow” and shut him down, as FORMER customers of Target Stores have done by the millions. He thinks he has the right, as president, to ORDER us to capitulate to his pipe dreams and perversions, but he DOESN'T. And he's too stupid to know it. Trying to get us to accept allowing men to gawk at women going to the bathroom in their own rooms is the heights of stupidity. I know it, and you know it, but, in his ignorance, he is sublimely unaware. (Before It's News)

She Coulda Saved 'Em!

Hillary could have saved the lives of those brave men at Benghazi, but she couldn't be bothered. Then she LIED to the nation about having “done all we could to save their lives,” according to an air force person stationed in Italy during the Benghazi attack, which was about 3 hours away—close enough to have been instrumental in stopping the latter half of the attack, when they were killed. But this person refused to testify to the committee investigating the killings, because he or she was afraid of retribution from superiors. Of course, this angered Trey Gowdy, but not at the whistleblower. He was angry at his superiors. “There are many ways they can get screwed over for cooperating with lawmakers. Particularly while Obama remains in power.” (paraphrased) Hillary should NEVER be allowed to “hold the reins of power” because she has no idea how to use them, and will get a lot more people killed. (Conservative Tribune)

Muslime As Rapists

Rape is a “cultural; thing” to Muslims, it seems, because there are daily stories in the news about their rapes and other sexual assaults. There are many stories about Muslim men raping women and saying they “couldn't help themselves” on seeing how the women were dressed. And that they figured if the woman so much as SMILED in their direction that was “an invitation for sex.” In the story linked here, this Muslim “refugee” had been in great Britain for five years without being caught in a rape. Who knows how many rapes he had been guilty of that weren't reported? But he was so stupid in this case that he was immediately caught, and sentenced to a long prison term. He was pizza delivery man, fergawdsake! What an occupation for a Muslim man! Especially considering that many of the very pizzas he delivered contained ham, sausage, or other swine derivative meats. Unlike the Muslim truck drivers who took jobs delivering beer, got fired for refusing to do the jobs they knew involved delivering alcohol, and sued their employer for being fired. They won the suit, and an ignorant liberal judge awarded them a lot of money. This is further evidence that Muslims only move here to make trouble, as so many of them do. They are the most easily “offended” people in the world, and that's part of their scheme to disrupt life in America. (Conservative Tribune)

Wendy's Goes Robot

Apparently, the ability to eliminate employees has been in existence for some time, and most of the “fast food outlets” have resisted using it—until they raised the minimum wage so high there was no way they could afford to pay that much to unskilled workers who didn't even know how to count change out of a cash drawer, and their cash registers had to TELL them how much to give back. If the power or the computer goes out, they need to use a calculator to figure it out. These people just aren't WORTH $15.00 per hour, and to pay them that much would force these companies out of business. So now Wendy's will be firing many employees, and not hiring replacements. This is not a “big bad employer” making it hard on the kids who worked for them. It's the other way around. It's the kids making it hard on Wendy's, by demanding more than they're entitled to earn, and using the government to BULLY them. But now they have NO JOBS at all. As predicted. (Conservative Tribune)

Now It's Discrimination

When AG Loretta Lynch promised to withhold federal funding if N. Carolina didn't abandon their law mandating people use the restrooms assigned to them by their BIRTH sex, it became no longer a bathroom issue, but now is a discrimination issue. The feds think that people who find it disgusting that MEN want to pee in the same rooms with women just because they “think they're women,” should be allowed to do so, and will withhold $billions in federal money if they don't “knuckle under.” That that action is ILLEGAL goes without saying. The feds have no right to DICTATE what laws a state may pass. The state is predominate in passing laws. The feds have no business interfering. But, under Obama, they do. Obama cares not what the Constitution says. He has proven that many times over. I was told the other day, “Transgenders gotta pee, too.” That was said as a reason to ALLOW men to pee in women's restrooms. But of course, this ignores the fact that transgenderism is a CHOICE, not a “condition,” and they should be made to use their own restrooms, and not to invade the women's restrooms. If they “think” they're women, that doesn't MAKE them women, and many fools with base intentions will take advantage of this perversion to victimize women in their own restrooms. (American Spectator)

Insane Intentions

Obama and his accomplices are talking about making laws that would instigate numerous suits by victims of gun violence, guaranteed to run gun makers and sellers out of business. Those suits would be for “damages” suffered by those victims by the guns they manufacture. The unintentional consequences to this would be the makers of other products where users MISUSED them. Maker of automobiles, for instance. Can you just imagine the effect it would have on them if everybody who screwed up and ran their car into a tree or ran a stop light and got nailed sued the car maker?

If gun makers were sued by everybody victimized by people who MISUSED their products, it would RUIN them, and that's what Obama and his accomplices want. Of course, that would mean that police agencies and federales would have to get THEIR guns from foreign sources, who would be immune from such suits, or have none. Meanwhile the disarming of the American people would be complete—except, of course, for all the ILLEGAL guns there are in the hands of criminals, crazies, and the Islamic terrorists Obama is importing by the hundreds of thousands, even paying their way with OUR money. (GunMart)

Punishing Achievement

That's what politicians on both sides want to do. Most of them, anyway. Obama says, “You didn't build that,” because somebody else taught you how to do it. But they taught OTHER PEOPLE how to do it, too, and they didn't do it. You did. Therefore, YOU did that. The people you learned how to do it from didn't do it, YOU did. They want to “tax the rich.” Because the rich have more money than the rest of us. Of course, that's because the rich “DID THAT,” and others BUY from them. They keep talking about “making the rich pay their fair share” of taxes. As if they didn't already pay MORE than “their fair share” of taxes. Truth is, 86% of ALL TAXES paid are paid by the top 25% of income earners.

The top 50% pay 97% of all income taxes paid. This, according to the tax information released by the IRS itself, on the last year of taxes paid. Liberals (and some conservatives) don''t want to talk about that. In sports, they're promoting the idea of giving ALL PARTICIPANTS a trophy, just for SHOWING UP, while refusing to separate the WINNERS from the rest, “so they won't make them feel bad.” Can you imagine having an auto race without a winner? What would be the purpose? A bunch or expensive cars running around a race track just for fun? With nobody ending up FIRST? So the other drivers won't get their precious feelings hurt? It's absurd! The whole idea of ANY sports event is to find out who is BEST at whatever that sport is. To refuse to name a winner is damned foolishness. But liberals are that damned foolish.

But that's what they're pushing, today. To “keep from making anybody feel bad.” They are just about successful in raising the minimum wage for people with NO TALENT to pay them a lot more than they're worth. The minimum wage is intended to allow businesses to hire people just entering the work force and TEACH THEM how to qualify to earn more. The minimum wage is not intended for “working families.” It's intended for kids, just out of school, to make some money while they're LEARNING how to be worth more. Kids, who still live at home and have very few financial obligations (except for those who buy the FICTION that a college education is necessary for everybody so they should go into debt for their entire life to go). (Just common sense)

The "Dog & Pony Show"

We've been subjected to a “dog & pony show” for as long as I can remember. It's called, “elections.” The current presidential primaries, for instance, have been going on for the last couple of years. Every day, on every news channel, they're talking about the primaries, and discussing the chances of each candidate, over and over, ad infinitum, ad nauseum. Now that the primaries are essentially over and the nominees are chosen (in essence), we start on the “general election.” The candidates have spread BILLIONS of dollars (conned out of us “peons”) around to people who LIVE on election money. Staffers, advisers, etc. Then there are the printers. The ones who print all the election signs and brochures that are EVERYWHERE. I used to work for such a printer, and he spent most of the year printing election signs and other printed items for politicians.

Without it, he would have gone out of business. Instead, he made a LOT of money. I've become convinced that the primary purpose of this is to “bore us to tears” so we'll stop paying attention and let them do what they will without our notice. And if we DO pay attention, it keeps our minds off what the current politicians are doing to us, every day. After the general election is over and a president chosen, they immediately start on the congressional elections, where they elect and re-elect senators and representatives. More billions spent, and “spread around” to the “printers” and others, all conned out of us “peons.” And there's no telling how much of that money finds it's way into the pockets of the candidates and their “close allies.” As much money as there is, it would be easy to “siphon” some off.

A “small amount” to the election campaign, but a considerable amount to a candidate. In other words, there is a PERMANENT ELECTION going on, and $BILLIONS spread around to finance it. And there's no way to escape it, except to ignore it, which is the plan the politicians use to “shut our eyes” to what they're doing to us, and make us THINK we have a “say” in who gets elected. (Just common sense)

Purposely Misunderstanding

The “reverend” who said, “How can you be “pro-life” and “pro-gun?” is purposely misunderstanding those who want to be able to defend themselves against users of ILLEGAL; weapons. He focuses entirely in guns KILLING, while IGNORING the fact that guns in the hands of honest, law-abiding people can KEEP THEIR FAMILY ALIVE. It's not about killing. It's about defending yourself against people who want to kill YOU. Having guns for self defense is NOT contradictory for people who object to the MURDER of unborn infants before they even have a chance at life. I don't think he's really that stupid, so he's got to be PURPOSELY misunderstanding the whole thing. (Local 8 Now)

Government Bullying Squelched

Andy Johnson just wanted a stock pond, to make watering his small herd easier. Which he should have the right to build without having to go, “hat in hand,” to some faceless, nameless bureaucrat to beg for a “permit” to build. But he did, and got his permit from the STATE to build it. The feds didn't like that. They wanted their “pound of flesh,” and sent him a “compliance order” threatening $37,500.00 fine PER DAY which, at the time of the letter, already amounted to $16 MILLION dollars which, if paid, would have put him out of business and allowed the government to “confiscate” (steal) all his property. So he filed suit with the help of the Pacific Legal Foundation, to assert his property rights. He won, when the feds capitulated and withdrew the fine threats and allowed the pond to stay (as if they had a right to deny it). Sometimes, when you stand up to bureaucrats, you can “slap them around.” (World Net Daily)

Dangerous At Cracker Barrel

It is more dangerous today to eat at a Cracker Barrel restaurant. They have decided not to allow people who legally carry a gun to eat in their restaurants or shop in their specialty stores that are attached. That means people who ILLEGALLY carry guns can come in at will, because they usually have their guns well hidden. That means they care not for the safety of their customers. Too bad. This WAS one of my favorite restaurants because their food was about as close to “home cooked” as you can get in a chain outfit. But now if I go there, I know I will be less safe than before. Since they don't keep ILLEGAL gun owners out, but DO keep LEGAL gun owners out. I figure it will be only a matter of time before some fool shoots up one of their restaurants with his ILLEGAL gun since he knows there will probably be NOBODY there who has a LEGAL gun to oppose him. (Captain's Journal)

Guna Aren't the Problem

People with guns are the problem. So maybe we should stop trying to keep guns out of the hands of honest, law-abiding people who aren't the problem, and make it more difficult for DISHONEST, non-law-abiding people to get their guns in a back alley somewhere, out of the trunk of the car belonging to another criminal, who ARE the problem. The gun is not the problem. People who want to use them to rob and kill people are the problem. There is NO WAY we can stop criminals from getting guns, so we need more guns in the hands of honest, law-abiding people so they can defend themselves from those who would use a gun to victimize them.

Today's anti-gun fools can't see that, and never will. Their minds are solidly against it, thinking those law-abiding people are the problem, while criminals still freely buy their illegal guns in that back alley. Did they make laws against ROCKS after Cain killed Abel with a rock? A rock, like a gun, is an inanimate object that can harm nobody, until somebody picks it up and uses it to hurt somebody. I'm getting tired of saying this, but the people who today make all the “anti-gun laws” are IGNORANT, because they think that all they have to do is “make a law” and that will solve all our problems It doesn't work that way, but they'll never know that. (Just common sense)

Bernie's Futile Campaign

He thinks he's winning. But in reality, he doesn't have a chance. Never did, from the very beginning. The “fix is truly in” and, no matter how many primary elections he wins, he will get fewer delegates every time. He's only there to provide the FICTION that Hillary actually has some competition. Nobody else saw fit to run against her because they “saw the handwriting on the wall” that she was “the chosen one.” The Republicans thought they had the same fiction set up when 17 people filed to run against Trump and the others. But it got out of hand, and now Trump is their presumptive nominee, and may wind up in the White House, in spite of them. There's a reason the Democrats chose to run an ADMITTED socialist against her. First, that would remove inspection of her own socialist record and give us somebody else to look at, while she continued to maintain she WASN'T a socialist while spouting socialist “giveaways” all over the map. She and Bernie are trying to outshout each other with their giveaway plans. (Salon)

Afraid Of A Third Party?

The same people who said that Trump, if he didn't get the GOP nomination, would go for a “third party attempt,” which would get Hillary elected, now that Trump is the “presumptive nominee,” are saying that their “only solution” is a third party. Which means they don't care if Hillary gets elected, and we sink under a sea of socialism for the foreseeable future. It may take 75 years to reverse it, as it did in Russia, where the communists “ruled” for that long before their socialist/communist government predictably collapsed, since neither socialism or communism produces any new wealth. They only LOOT the producers of new wealth so they can “redistribute YOUR wealth” to the LEECHES of society who only want to live at the expense of others. (Just common sense)

Smart Gun Jammers

Have you ever seen an electronic weapon that can't be jammed? Electronic devices work on radio waves from one point to another. In the case of the Smart Gun, it's from the gun to a wrist watch-like device, and back. All somebody who wants to prevent your “Smart Gun” from firing needs to do is figure out how to interfere with the signal that goes between these devices. And you can bet there are plenty of people smart enough to do that, and make your “smart gun” a “dumb gun” and unable to fire. You can also depend on the fact that the GOVERNMENT will have some of those people working for them, so THEY can make your gun USELESS on demand. I'm sure they know this, and are working HARD toward that end. They can't just BAN guns, so they make them useless in our hands, while theirs remain fully functional. Of course, what better way to take away our guns than to REQUIRE all guns to BE “smart guns: and in one “fell swoop” make ALL guns not smart guns illegal to own? Liberals are clever. They will always find a way around prohibitions on their actions. They will always accomplish their aims in some way. Of course, none of this means anything to those who use ILLEGAL guns, and don't obey laws. They will still have non-electronic guns that can't be jammed by the government, or anyone else. (Truth About Guns)

Restraining Orders Suck

They're “just a piece of paper” and mean NOTHING to a person bent on committing an outrageous crime. If you want to commit murder, what hindrance is a restraining order? The “penalty” for violating a restraining order means NOTHING to somebody who wants to beat up his wife—or KILL her. It's just a minor obstacle, easily overcome. When he is charged with murder, violating a restraining order is just a piffle. A good example right now is that FEDERAL cop who murdered his wife and a bunch of other people in a shooting spree that went all over town in a DC suburb. She had a restraining order against him. Did it do her any good? Not a chance. She's dead. And so are five other people. He violated that restraining order and he'll be punished for it, and he will hardly notice. But who cares? He'll be punished for mass murder, too, which is a little more important. (Orlando Sentinel)

"Biggest Con Job Ever!"

The Australian gun confiscation is one of the biggest con jobs ever (outside of AlGore's global warming swindle). It's been in effect for almost 20 years, and they claim it is a success because they haven't had another “mass shooting (except for the man who killed his wife, three children, and himself just the other day) since. Of course, several other countries have had similar mass shootings, have not confiscated weapons, and STILL have had no “mass shootings” in the same time period. I wonder if they define “mass shootings” the same way we do: four or more people killed)? That has a lot to do with their claims. Like most “gun laws” today, their law has done NOTHING to stop armed violence. But they don't admit that. They use very narrowly defined figures to back up their phony claims, just like Obama and his clones do. (The Mercury)

Falsely Using the "Race Card"

These three women got into it with several people aboard a city bus in Albany, NY, and it created a massive outcry about racism. Unfortunately, it wasn't the sort of racism they tried to say it was. It was THEIR racism against white people that led to their false reporting of the incident as the white girl causing a racial incident against THEM. These things are becoming more prevalent these days, as black racists who are against white people “phony-up” racial incidents to support their CLAIMS of racial enmity against THEM. There aren't any REAL such incidents (or very few) so in order to promote their story, they CREATE them. These girls got caught, and were indicted for three misdemeanors for false reporting of a crime. We need to be a lot more suspicious of such reports, and not take them as “Gospel” before they're proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. It's this sort of thing that caused six cops in Baltimore to face felony charges for something that was CAUSED by a crook trying to incriminate them and making a mistake that cost him his life, that was no fault of theirs. (The Blaze)

Don't Mess With This Gal!

She'll HURT ya! And that's no exaggeration. This guy tried to rob a convenience store and she “took him out” with a fire extinguisher. Which proves again that you can make a weapon out of just about anything. The only thing that kept him alive is that she missed his head when she cold-cocked him with it. Trying to grab money out of her clerk's hand apparently infuriated her, and she reacted accordingly. Just a lesson for thugs. Never underestimate your intended victim. That might be a big mistake, as it was in this instance. Unfortunately, he still got away with $500.00, and the Toledo cops are looking for him. They might even find him too, because his face is fully visible on the video taken by the store's security camera. And he might have to seek medical attention for his fire extinguisher bruises and maybe even broken bones. (The Blaze)

She'll Go Further

Hillary is promising to “go further” than Obama did in using executive orders to “stem gun violence.” In other words, she intends to violate the Constitution worse than Obama did. Do we really want this monster as president? Liberals simply want to DISARM honest people so they can't fight back when “federal agents” come for their property. In many countries, they succeeded in disarming the populace, and mass executions soon followed. Do you want that to happen here? Why do we (not me) keep electing such fools when we KNOW they're going to screw us at every opportunity? WE know Hillary is a socialist. She won't admit it, but just listen to the “freebies” she's promising. THAT'S socialism. The bad thing is that right behind her is an ADMITTED socialist who, if elected, will do even worse things than she will. Gun bans are illegal in this country, so liberals do everything they can to make the guns we HAVE useless. Laws like that in Illinois, where “concealed carry” is legal—IF the gun is UNLOADED are good example of the USELESSNESS of today's “gun laws.” (Breitbart)

Patterns In Gun Laws

There are several basic patterns in the gun laws they keep making, if you look closely. One: they just about all don't do anything to stem “gun violence.” Two: they only affect honest, law-abiding people who OBEY laws, and those people aren't the problem. They do NOTHING to stop criminals from getting their guns illegally, and they ARE the problem. Three: they work to make the guns you have USELESS in opposing criminals and their illegal guns. Examples: gun registries. These give the “authorities” a list of LEGAL gun owners, most of whom do not use them to commit crimes, while ignoring ILLEGAL gun owners, who DO. Gun buybacks: They give criminals the opportunity to get rid of guns they have used in crimes and make money doing it. These “buybacks” are usually “no questions asked,” so the cops can't even prosecute people for the crimes that are on those guns. Other guns turned in are old and useless guns which the money they get allows them to buy newer, usable guns.

Then the criminals use that money to buy new guns, usually without crimes on them. Gun safes and gun locks. This is designed to make it impossible for an honest person to get his gun into operation quickly if he is attacked by an illegal gun owner. It takes seconds, or even MINUTES to get them in operation while the criminal is shooting his ILLEGAL gun at you. In at least one state I know of, concealed carry is allowed—IF the gun is unloaded. Tell me: what earthly good is a concealed weapon that is UNLOADED in an emergency? Could you ask the criminal to “Wait while I load my gun?” Will he cooperate? Doubtful. This is typical of the ILLOGICAL thinking that goes into ALL “anti-gun laws.” they can't just BAN GUNS, so they pass laws that make them USELESS to honest people. Notice that NONE of these laws affects the criminal, who doesn't register his illegal gun, nor does he obey their silly rules. Only law-abiding people do. So of what use ARE they? (Just common sense)

The Media Intentionally Lies

The headline read: “Trump likes raising minimum wage.” They took that from his answer to a question about raising the minimum wage. “He said, 'I'm looking at it, but what I want to do is create jobs that pay much more than the minimum wage.” That's how they TWIST what people say, and people who only read the headlines and never get into the “meat” of an item believe it, because they don't know any better. They PROUDLY “pay no attention to politics,” and thus they know NOTHING about what's really going on believe it, because they don't know any better. They commonly use erroneous headlines to “set the narrative” to what they want to portray. Other methods include actively LYING on basic issues and seeing to it their LIES are repeated, over and over, in many places. (Rush Limbaugh)

I'm Not A Conservative

Although conservative is very close to what I am. I agree with most tenets of conservatism, but there are a few with which I do not agree. So in all conscience, I cannot call myself a conservative. What I AM is a “rational individualist.” I make my own decisions, in all things. Neither am I an Objectivist (capital “O”), for the same reasons. I agree with most of the tenets of Ayn Rand's “Objectivist philosophy because it's based on common sense and logic. But there some with which I disagree. I AM an objective philosopher. One of those is her complete rejection of all things religious. I believe there is an “intelligence” out there somewhere, that created and organized this complicated universe. I'd be a fool not to. But I am not sure about what form it takes. Is it a God? I don't know. But it seems to me that something with the intelligence needed to order this complicated universe wouldn't give a damn if I “worshiped” him/her/it. I believe it is not the business of politicians to dictate my life, and that is what runs my life. I believe in morality, and I practice it. That does not mean I want to dictate what others do, or think. If that offends you, too bad. That's what I am. (Just common sense)

Fracking Is NOT Wrong

The Supreme court, in at least one state, has told local governments that they have no authority to BAN Fracking in their territory. Banning Fracking is a STATE responsibility. But the real story here is that anti-fracking fools, like anti-gun fools, tell many LIES to support their hatred of a perfectly safe drilling method that can help this country become “energy independent,” so that we can no longer be forced to buy oil from people who hate our guts. There has never been ANY PROOF that Fracking does anything to the ground water. The opponents of Fracking simply LIE to convince us it does. Why they do it is beyond me. They are as much victims of the need to buy oil from people who hate us as anybody else. But they fight Fracking, anyway. Some people are just stupid I guess. (American Thinker)

Rabble-Rousing Muslims

They went into this cafe and purposely violated their 45 minute per coffee order policy, and got thrown out. Now they're asserting that the only real reason they were thrown out is that they were Muslim, which is a fantasy on their part. They're pursuing the Muslim policy of causing as much trouble as they can by suing for the smallest imagined slight, while counting on liberal judges to order their victims to pay huge judgments—large enough to put them out of business if paid. This is a pattern being repeated over and over all over the country. It's a scam also being used by gay activists to put bakeries that won't bake cakes for their “weddings” out of business for DARING to disagree with their “orders.” The scam only works if the judge is a liberal and rules according to his/her prejudices, rather than the law. And there are a lot of those out there now. All appointed by liberal presidents. (The Blaze)

How Low Can You Go?

For liberals, the answer is, “pretty low,” if they allow their CHILDREN to shout obscenities at political candidates without punishing them. In Indiana at least one parent did so, standing by (I assume) while his 8 or 9 year-old child shouted “F—k you! several times, at Ted Cruz. And when Ted suggested that in “his time” that would have merited a spanking, it got HIM criticism from stupid liberals, who are against ANY kind of corporal punishment. What is this world coming to when a parent APPROVES of his small child shouting “F—k you!” without punishing him or her? Personally, I think that parent TOLD his child to do that. That's the only reason to believe that child would have DARED to say such a thing in a parent's presence. (The Blaze)

"Everytown" Intentionally Lied

Talk about OBAMA'S “finessed numbers!” They put out the results of a “study” that purported to show that 86% of “mass shootings” happened OUTSIDE of “gun-free zones,” when they KNEW that was a bald-faced lie. To get that number, they included “home invasions,” which were NOT “mass shootings.” This is the kind of thing you can EXPECT from people like the ”Everytown for Gun Safety” crowd. If they can't get true figures to back up their phony claims (and they can't), they MAKE THEM UP as they go along. We catch them doing it all the time, but they ignore that and go right on citing their phony figures as if we hadn't said a word. They have to do that because there ARE no REAL figures to back their play. They know it, so they LIE. (Breitbart)

Losing, But Winning

Hillary has LOST 18 primary elections, but has walked away with more delegates than the guy who WON those elections. Which makes it obvious that the game is FIXED to let her win, in spite of being outclassed and beaten on a majority of cases when the people get to vote. It could not be more clear that the game is fixed for her to win the nomination, no matter how many primaries her opponent wins. The game has been fixed so that the Democrat “establishment” gets to DICTATE the candidate we get to vote for, from the beginning. They use the excuse that this has been going on for years, but that's no excuse. Long use of the “con” is not a reason to say it is right and proper to disenfranchise all Americans. The “fix is different on the Republican side, but it is a fix, anyway. They don't like Trump, so they change the rules before each convention to make it harder for him to gain ground on his opponents. But his popularity is so immense, it did them no good. He IS the “presumptive candidate,” unless they pull some REALLY scummy tricks, which I wouldn't put past them. (News Busters)

Is U. S. A Christian Nation?

Some people think not. But all you have to do is look at the paperwork provided by the Founders to see the influence of Christianity on the very FOUNDING of this nation. Then look at other things, such as the phrase, “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, and the words, “In god We Trust” on our currency. Then look at the prayers that usually precede any political meeting, and even an auto race. Christianity is everywhere. It can't be denied, but some fools try to deny it. Mostly atheists and Muslims. This nation has been a Christian nation from the very beginning, and the evidence is everywhere. What kind of fool denies it? Somebody who wants to destroy the very foundation of this nation for his own purposes. There is a concerted effort now operating to destroy Christianity in this nation. Don't let it overtake you. I'm not saying you MUST be a Christian. You are free, in this country, to believe any way you wish. What I AM saying is, don't try and inhibit anybody else from doing the same. (The Blaze)

"I'll Increase Unemployment!"

What kind of a stupid politician PROMISES to increase unemployment by putting a major staple product producer “out of business” if she is elected? Obama has been working HARD to accomplish that ever since he was elected. He is CREATING massive unemployment in “coal states.” Hillary promises to continue his stupidity. Coal is a very NECESSARY product, used by energy companies, to produce their energy. There is NOTHING viable to replace it, if they go out of business. If coal producers are no longer around, power companies will have to use alternative, MORE EXPENSIVE sources to replace it. That will make THEIR rates skyrocket. Obama doesn't care about that, and neither does Hillary. This promise alone, should ELIMINATE her as a viable candidate, even if she is NOT indicted for the felonies she has committed. (The Blaze)

Trump Won, Now What?

Trump won Indiana, even though Cruz managed to find ONE poll that said HE would win. He has ended his bid for the nomination. Trump is the “presumptive nominee. So now what are ya gonna do? The “Never Trump crowd,” and the”Absolutely Never Trump crowd” have vowed NOT to vote for Trump. So who does that leave? The politicians have made it impossible for anybody else to BE the Republican nominee. They wanted to DICTATE who we were ALLOWED to vote for, as usual, and got “hoist on their own petard.” Now they've got a nominee they don't want. So who do they vote for now? Refusing to vote for Trump in the general election is voting for either an embittered old grandma who has a lot of money and is a socialist (though she won't admit it) and wants to make sure nobody else makes a lot of money, and an ADMITTED socialist who wants the same thing.

If either of them wins the White House, we will sink into socialism, which is a “first cousin” to communism. We will become the next socialist “showcase state.” The next “Soviet Union.” Some angry Republican “establishment” people have even vowed to vote for Hillary, which is the stupidest thing they could do, and illustrates their INCOMPETENCE. They repeat Cruz's daily assertion that Trump CAN'T win, while he “took him out.” Reagan faced the same animus from the “establishment” people, and he won in a landslide. Not only did he win, he became one of our BEST presidents, and did many good things for this nation, though liberals won't admit it, and want to say, “The era of Reagan is over.” But it isn't, and the latest incarnation of Reagan is Donald Trump. I would have been satisfied with either Trump or Cruz. But now we've got Trump, and I hope he does as well as Reagan did, But the alternative is too horrible to consider. (Bloomberg)

"Shall Not Be Infringed"

The Constitution clearly states that the right of Americans to be armed “shall NOT be infringed.” It is read to be a ban on stopping people from owning and using firearms in self defense. Anti-gun fools read that as being ONLY a prohibition on banning guns, altogether. So they do everything they can to make life difficult for those who DO buy firearms to use in self defense against those who get theirs ILLEGALLY. Every law they make, such as background checks for ammunition buyers, mandatory gun safes, trigger locks, a requirement to carry an EMPTY GUN in places where concealed carry is “allowed,” ARE an “infringement” on the right of Americans to be armed. “Infringement” doesn't have to be a total BAN on the purchase and use of a firearm. It can take many forms, including applying silly limitations on carrying and using them, so as to make them USELESS. (GOPUSA)

More Laws, Less Gun Violence?

Do more laws equal less gun violence? The short answer is no. But liberal politicians don't agree with that, so they keep making more and more of them, and they do NOTHING except make life easier for armed criminals, who get their guns ILLEGALLY, and don't obey laws. Anybody who believes they will is feeble-minded. But they keep getting elected, and keep making their USELESS “gun laws.” This makes life easier for those criminals, as well as the crazies who want to shoot up groups of people, and Islamic terrorists, that Obama is importing buy the hundreds of thousands, and at OUR expense. The MYTH that “gun violence is out of control” is promoted by the liberal media, but it is NOT.

Gun violence has been going steadily DOWN in recent years, but they don't want us to know that, so they keep blasting us with their LIES and phony “statistics.” One of the things the writer of the article linked found that “gang activity” was the TOP cause of gun deaths. Drug activity second, and third, “criminal on criminal activity. The chances of the “average person” being killed by a gun is WAY less than 1%. If you were paying attention, you'll see that unless you're suicidal, your chances of being killed by a gun are astronomically LOW. As long as you stay out of gangs and away from illegal drugs. If you do these things, your chances of being killed by a gun are 28 in 700,000. An extremely small number. Which does not jibe at all with the phony numbers put out by the anti-gun fools, who just want to disarm HONEST people for their own purposes. (Full 30)

What Are They Doing Here?

Muslims seem to be offended by just about everything American. Yet here they are. What the hell reason do they have for COMING here if so many things American offends them? He only logical answer is their very presence here is part of the Islamic terrorist “infiltration” of America. They come here in bunches, most of which don't contain women or children, or old people. Only young men of “fighting age.” they plan on doing two things: create as many problems for us as possible by “being offended” about everything they see or hear, and KILLING us for not believing the exact same way they do. They plan to eventually OUTNUMBER us at the polls so they can put in their own leaders, who will further screw things up. They think we aren't aware of this, and they're right, when you think about all the fools that “pay no attention to politics,” and thus have no idea what's going on around them, and how it will inevitably affect them. But SOME of us know, and eventually, we will “get through” to those who pay no attention. I only hope we aren't too late. Now, they're “offended” by our National Anthem. Screw 'em! (Liberty Alliance)

The Wrong Target

The anti-gun crowd consistently go after the wrong target in their imaginary efforts to stop violent crime. Every time they hear about a murder they want to make more and more laws to DISARM honest Americans while DOING NOTHING to disarm criminals, who obey no laws. Now we find out that there are more murders committed by UNARMED people than by those using guns, by a big margin. So what should we do? Ban hands and feet? Make a FIST illegal? The Criminal Justice Information Center has found that 11,641 murders were committed in the United states in 2014, and 31 in the U. S. Territories, and only 8,124 were committed by use of a gun. Less than HALF! So their contention that “if guns were eliminated, the murder rate would go down” is patently false. Even if it were POSSIBLE to eliminate guns completely, that would not happen. As I've said many times, people who want to do murder WILL find a way. (The Right to Bear)

So It Doesn't Happen?

That's what anti-gun fanatics say about concealed carriers stopping crime, hoping to make us think getting their own guns for self-defense is futile. Why then, do we see stories of exactly that happening every day in the news? Only in news media sources not a member of the liberal media, of course. They refuse to report such cases because they are counter to their “agenda” to disarm all Americans (for what reason I can't fathom). It happened again in Chicago, which has some of the tightest “gun laws” in the nation. A criminal gunman entered a convenience store to rob it and was killed by a legally-armed “concealed carrier” who was also in the store.

One of the worst fears of those anti-gun fanatics is for people to discover their lies about this and other things related to “gun control.” They think (rightly) that if a majority of people find out about their lies, they will know their entire campaign to keep us from defending ourselves is in danger when we learn the truth. Concealed carry is increasing in Illinois, in spite of the best efforts of incompetent Mayor Emanuel and (inept) Chicago Police Commissioner Gary McCarthy, whose answer to gun violence is always centered on the GUN, which is but a TOOL the criminals use to victimize us. Another of their fears is that we will take up use of the same tool to oppose them. (I expect the crime numbers in Illinois to go down precipitously in the future due to this, as being an armed robber becomes a more dangerous job, and more of them are killed). And for that not to be reported in the liberal; media. (Bearing Arms)

They Call It "Gun Violence"

But it isn't. It's CONTROL. They also call it “common sense,” but it isn't that, either. There's no common sense in disarming honest, law-abiding people while criminals. Crazies, and Islamic terrorists have no trouble getting their guns, ILLEGALLY. Obama and his accomplices continue to make USELESS anti-gun laws and regulations, KNOWING they're useless to “curb gun violence,” but ARE useful in helping him control the population. If they don't have guns, they can't oppose his efforts to “redistribute THEIR wealth.” His “big thing” is “Smart Guns” that will only fire in the hands of their owner. It uses a computer chip to do so. He's REQUIRING everybody to have a “Smart Gun” in the future, including cops.

It uses computer technology. Have you ever seen a computer that didn't occasionally “crash?” If this computer crashes, you could be dead. Because the criminals won't be using “Smart Guns,” and they'll just shoot you. He's extending the federal background checks, which he ALSO knows doesn't save a single life. While we're importing Islamic terrorists by the hundreds of thousands at Obama's behest, and AGAINST the wishes of the American people, even paying their way with our tax money, Obama is conspiring to reduce the number of LEGAL guns we have to use in opposing them. It's as if he WANTS the Islamic terrorists to win. And I believe he does. I believe he is a “closet Muslim” who CAME HERE to help them win. (Just common sense)

Why Is It, You Think?

Chicago, Baltimore, and DC have some of the tightest “gun laws” in the nation. And between them, they account for just about HALF of the murder rate increase in the country. Is that POSSIBLE? Gun laws prevent people from killing each other with guns, don't they? Don't criminals read the signs saying, “no guns allowed here” and take their guns back home before entering? Don't they unload their guns where open carry is allowed if the gun is unloaded? Do they store their guns in “gun safes” and use “trigger locks” on their guns? Not a chance! Criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists don't OBEY laws. They take their guns with them everywhere they go, and they're ready to use them at the “drop of a hat.” And sometimes they even drop the hat. Anti-gun fools are convinced that all they have to do is make a law against something to stop it. They're deluded that way. We need to get rid of those fools. (AIM)

IS Hillary "Inevitable?"

She's getting fewer votes than she got in 2008, when she lost to a previously unknown one-term senator. But they keep saying she'll “beat Trump OR Cruz like a drum.” I think they're just trying to keep their minds thinking they're wining—which they're NOT. What's actually going to happen is either Cruz OR Trump is going to “beat HER like a drum.” This time, her opponent will not even be an unknown. Trump is VERY well known, and so is Cruz. Cruz because he actually DID something, and Trump because they know he WILL do something when he gets in position to do something. They want us to THINK Hillary is “inevitable,” but she is, ONLY in their minds.

In reality, she's just an old grandma with a loud screech for a voice, and she uses it regularly. She thinks screeching will replace intelligence in the minds of voters. It's key to understand that in 2008, it was a 3-way race. Today it is a 2-way race between her and an ancient, wild-haired, admitted SOCIALIST who, if elected, may not even live long enough to finish his term, and she's getting fewer votes. The only way she will ever be president is to become his vice-president, and waits for him to die. And that's only of she escapes being sent to prison, which is a distinct possibility. (Breitbart)

Does the Left Cheat?

No, unless you look closely. In the recent fight over N. Carolina's law requiring people to only enter restrooms and changing rooms related to their REAL sex, the left presented 26 large file boxes of signatures to back their objections to the law and their demand to repeal it. Great move, huh? Yea, unless you look closer, and realize that the only boxes FULL of signatures are TWO. The rest are mostly empty. And the largest number of signatures come from out of state, rendering them NO GOOD. Talk about “stuffing the box!” People say the left never is guilty of election fraud. Just ask the dead people who rise out of their graves to vote, and the people who vote many times. Of course, they enlist the Black Panthers to intimidate voters. They say it's only been happening since Kennedy. But it's been happening for long before that. Liberals say there isn't any election fraud committed by them. It's all committed by the Republicans. So there's no need for any rules to prevent it. But there is, and THEY are the ones guilty of it. So rules are NEEDED to prevent it. I'd say ALL Democrats in office now are there because of voter fraud. (Common Constitutionalist)

Target Stock Down

Surprise, surprise! Target stock “took a nose dive” after they announced their stupid policy to allow MEN in women's restrooms and changing rooms. Those rooms have always been separate for a GOOD, and logical reason: man and women are different, and BOTH (whether or not you know it) like to dress and undress without members of the opposite sex looking at them and ogling them—unless they're about to have sex—which doesn't apply here. They talk about “protecting their customers from discrimination,” but what they're doing is opening them up to sexual harassment, and sexual abuse. They're accommodating a very few while placing MANY in danger. At this writing, the boycott petition of Target Stores has received a MILLION signatures. Among them mine. This, in about a week. That should tell them something about just whom they are “protecting.” The drop represents about $2.5 BILLION. That's a lot of dough to support a STUPID action. (The Blaze)

Another Useless Law

I've written many times about the USELESS anti-gun laws they keep passing that do NOTHING to reduce gun violence. One such law is the “high-capacity magazine ban” they like to pass everywhere. Where they have been passed, they have had NO effect on gun violence. In fact, they have contributed to an INCREASE in gun violence. Other laws, such as the “empty gun” requirement in a state where “open carry” is allowed if the gun is empty, which makes the gun USELESS, are the norm, and they don't work, either. Likewise declaring a “gun-free zone” only keeps guns owned LEGALLY out, leaving things open for thugs to bring their ILLEGAL guns in and victimize people without opposition. Every idea they have seems to be totally USELESS in reducing gun violence, but they keep making them, anyway, in their stupidity. I can only describe it as stupidity, because it is OBVIOUS to intelligent people that the laws they have so far passed DO NOT WORK, and they know it, but insist on making more of the same USELESS laws, over and over. (Breitbart)