Everything Is Racist

If you find racism under every rock, as do most liberals (Democrats). Racism (black against white racism) is more prevalent in America today than at ANY time in our history, fed and LED by Barack Hussein Obama, who consistently USES racism for his own purposes. He told us that, if we elected him president, it would “forever end racism in America.” But what really happened was that, under his “leadership,” racism is now “out of control” in America. But it's not the racism of the past, with whites supposedly on top. Today it is BLACK racism against whites, and it is very close to being “enshrined” in law, as white against black racism USED to be. Now some blacks are pushing for their own water fountains, something that they hated when it was the other way around. Obama is as much white as he is black, but he CHOOSES to be black, so he can cry “racism” every time anybody opposes him. (Twitchy)

A Hundred Year's War?

A Daily Caller writer says we should be “prepared to fight a hundred year's war” with radical Islam. What? We've already been fighting a much LONGER than “hundred year's war” with Radical Islam. It “simmered down” for a few years for lack of money to support that war by radical Muslims. But with the infusion of the oil money WE helped them acquire, they now have plenty of money to support their terrorism. Remember “The shores of Tripoli” in the Marine Hymn? That refers to the battle against Islamic terrorism in Jefferson's day (which we won), and the war has been going on ever since. Rush Limbaugh says, “Our memories tend to begin when we were born,” and he's right, as usual. People born recently don't REMEMBER the battles we've had with radical Muslims over the years, and our current government suppresses mention of them. (Russ Read/Daily Caller)

Making Legal Guns Useless

Liberal politicians and other gun grabbers can't just BAN guns altogether in this country, like they did in Australia. So they make rules making the guns in your possession USELESS. The Founders didn't prohibit that in the Constitution. They didn't foresee the gyrations some politicians would go to, in order to “get around” the Constitution. FOUR cities in New York State (where else?) Have now required ALL guns in your home be “locked up and disabled,” so when a criminal; crazy, or Islamic terrorist comes there to rob or KILL you, it'll take more time than you will have to get it into action, making it USELESS. “Gun locks” have worked to do that for some time, all over the country. ALL such laws should be ignored, so your guns are instantly ready to use to defend you from the attacks if the “bad guys,” who HAVE no such restrictions on their ILLEGAL guns. If you do, remember that the cops may charge YOU with a crime for not following their orders. But ya gotta do what ya gotta do to protect yourself. (Guns 'N' Freedom)

"Avoiding Constitutional Arguments"

Liberal Maryland Senator Barbara Milkuski said she “wanted to avoid constitutional questions” in the discussions about Obama's UNCONSTITUTIONAL “executive orders.” Sure she would. Constitutional questions are the ONLY thing that should be discussed about that. If you rule them out, you (Democrats) win the argument, hands down. That's what she wants, obviously, but she ain't gonna get it. It's this kind of thing that usually lets the liberals (Democrats) win the argument, if they manage to get it done. They always give it “good-sounding names,” hoping to fool voters who pay no attention to politics until just before an election, when the lies are flying. If you can't include “constitutional questions” in the discussion, there's nothing left to discuss—which is what Democrats want. (Daily Caller)

Ho, Hum. Another "Investigation"

Congress has launched yet ANOTHER “dog and pony show” (investigation) intro Hillary's e-mail practices. That's outside the FBI's CRIMINAL investigation. They already have enough to put her UNDER the jail for the next 100 years. But NOBODY has seen fit to bring any CHARGES against her, and probably won't until after the election, so as not to mess up her chances of becoming president. If she wins, forget it. If she loses, I STILL doubt they will bring charges. She's “royalty,” after all. Ordering a flunky to strip the “classified markings” from some e-mails, so she could say she never SENT a classified e-mail, is by itself, enough. But will it be? They're dumping millions of dollars into three or four “investigations,” while coming up with NOTHING, according to them. But we're more intelligent than they are. (Town Hall)

Why Bernie?

Why is Bernie Sanders, an admitted, dedicated SOCIALIST, who wants to sponsor giveaway programs that will cost $18 TRILLION, leading the Democrat lists, even once? It isn't because of anything he offers. It is because nobody really wants Hillary, and he's the only known NAME candidate on the Democrat side besides her. It's only because so few really want Hillary to be their nominee that Bernie is “surging ahead.” He's all they've got. He wasn't supposed to be any competition, at all. He was supposed to be there only to make it LOOK like Hillary actually had some opposition. That gave Whosis inspiration to enter himself, and that has proven a money-waster. And he wasn't any competition at all, until Hillary's crimes became so obvious. If his supporters really want socialism, they're ignorant. Socialism (and communism, another form of collectivism) has proven itself to be nothing but governmental THIEVERY and those who like it simply want a “free ride” at somebody else's expense. It failed in Russia and other places, because it does not produce any new wealth, and only leeches off the producer of new wealth. (Just common sense)

Boy, Would THEY Howl!

If Christians destroyed a Muslim “shrine.” they'd cry “religious intolerance” so loud, they'd hear it on Mars. But they think NOTHING of destroying a CHRISTIAN monastery that has been in existence for thousands of years (in Iraq) and will cry the same if we object. And be willing to KILL those who protest (killing is their stock response to ANY opposition). They think they can rape women (and men and boys) with impunity, but if a Christian LOOKS cross-eyed at a Muslim woman, they lose their minds. They behead and otherwise kill Christians (including CHILDREN) and think we should not be allowed to complain, much less kill them back. I think we should keep a “close eye” on Muslims, and when they do something to support terrorism, kill them on the spot! Don't put them in a prison for a few years and then release them to go back and kill some more, as Obama seems bent on doing. (Town Hall)

It's Not About Religion!

Nikki Haley said she doesn't like Trump applying a “religious test” to allow people into this country. But it's not ABOUT religion! Islam is NOT a real religion, in the first place! It is a political movement DISGUISED as a religion so they can take advantage of the “perks” we allow religions. It's a Nazi-like movement that intends to envelop the entire WORLD! What Trump IS saying is that we need to LOOK CLOSELY at Muslims before allowing them in so we won't allow millions of Islamic TERRORISTS in, to kill as many of us as they can because we AREN'T Muslims. For them, it IS about religion. The only reason Muslims are even MENTIONED is because Muslims are killing us for not believing the same way they do. Why she can't see that, I don't know. And she's a REPUBLICAN! The fact that these killers happen to be Muslims is immaterial to us. They're KILLERS. MONSTERS! Rapists, beheaders of men, women, and CHILDREN! It's impossible to tell a “good Muslim” from a deranged KILLER “playing at” being a Muslim, so we need to find a way to properly “vet” them, and WAIT until we accomplish that. She is falling into the TRAP the GOP has laid for Trump. And that can only mean a WIN for Democrats in the end, if enough fools buy it.. I don't think she wants that. (CNN)

Stopping Hundreds of Criminals

The anti-gun fools say it doesn't happen, and their dutiful accomplices in the liberal media make sure we don't learn of it when it happens, mostly. But legal gun-carriers have stopped HUNDREDS of criminals in the act of robbing or hurting someone. The Daily Caller News Foundation (DCNF) surveyed 200 cases where individuals defended themselves, or others with their legally-owned and carried guns. The users were of all ages and sexes, and socioeconomic subsets imaginable, but mostly the middle-aged. Only 69 of the 200 crooks faced with a citizen with his/her own legal gun were killed, with most fleeing or just being caught. The majority of cases were decided without a shot being fired. (Eagle Rising)

Ignorance In Politics

The ignorance in politics isn't all on the Democrat side. It's on the Republican side, too. The Republicans are so much against their front-runner that their “leadership” is threatening to go for Hillary Clinton, the Democrat front-runner. How STUPID is that? They say Trump “isn't a conservative.” So the hell WHAT? Being a conservative isn't the end-all and be-all of Republican politics. Trump is BETTER than conservative. He believes in almost everything conservatives believe, and MORE, while discarding the bad parts. He is his own man. He doesn't NEED their money, so they can't control him like they can a normal politician. He can buy and sell ALL of them, and that frightens them. On the Democrat side, their front-runner is a career criminal who has committed many felonies (whether or not the DOJ ever charges her).

Right behind her is a dedicated Marxist socialist who wants to take away the profit EARNED by the producers of new wealth for the benefit of those who can't, or WON'T produce ANYTHING, or EARN anything. Behind him is a NOBODY that nobody ever heard of outside his own state, whatever state that is, all of whom push socialist policies (which is how Russia became communist, which is simply a slightly different form of collectivism from socialism). Too many people wanted to live at the expense of others, and voted the thieves into office and let them do what they wanted—which was to have TOTAL power over them—and that's what they got, until; communism predictably FAILED, 75 years later, after killing MILLIONS and destroying their lifestyle. We have a chance now to REJECT a similar fate, if we're smart enough. You don't have to be a conservative to want the government to stay out of your life, to pay fewer taxes, and stop supporting the “drones” of society. (Just common sense)

Living In A Dream World

That's how professionals describe Obama as he assures us ISIS is NOT an “existential threat” to the United States. Many people today don't even know what an “existential threat” IS, considering the state of America's schools, today as they go about teaching the kids “political correctness” and all about the Koran—but NEVER the Bible, which is the handbook of OUR religion, OR about real history. They say he should ask some of the millions of innocent people they have killed—Oh, yeah—he can't. They're dead. And they note that there have been more Islamic terrorist acts IN America during his administration than during ANY previous one. If this fool would ever “wise up” I might even support him. But that ain't gonna happen. He's too incompetent. (CNS News)

Threat to Cops Not Over

That's what they're saying about the “threat to police in Philly.” Which shows a COMPLETE ignorance of how things are! The “threat to police” is just BEGINNING! The Philly shooting is just ONE of the instances, SO FAR. There will be more, as misfits all over the world target the cops, and ambush them when they least expect it. Of course, what's going to happen is that more thugs are going to die as cops, whose nerves are on edge, react quickly when the thugs think they aren't paying attention. They SAY cops kill too many black men, but now they're going to get that, in spades, as cops are MUCH quicker to shoot than ever before, and it will be mostly black men why try it, and will die from it. And nobody with any intelligence at all, will blame them (the cops). They want to stay alive, after all. (Conservative Byte)

Turning the World Upside Down

That's what's happening today. Ignorant people are doing things that are completely AGAINST their own interests. An ILLEGAL alien wants to violate the Constitution he doesn't understand (because his country doesn't have one) by making it ILLEGAL to use the WORD “illegal” to refer to ILLEGAL ALIENS. The bad part is, he may find some liberal politicians willing to do it for him, and a liberal judge willing to penalize some people for using it. An ADMITTED socialist is giving HIllary FITS in the presidential race, while she remains either the front-runner or close, while fighting THREE congressional “investigations” and an FBI criminal investigation.

And in at least one place, people are wearing hijabs “in solidarity” with Muslim women while Obama is PAYING to import hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists disguised as “refugees” so they can get together and kill us for not believing in their “religion.” They call us paranoid for saying that, while they continue to KILL innocent people world wide. You're not paranoid if people are really out to kill you. Meanwhile, Obama releases many convicted Muslim terrorist MURDERERS in exchange for a few INNOCENT hostages held by Iran while giving them back hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars to use in sponsoring even more terrorism. Are we STUPID, or what? it has become obvious to me that many of us ARE. The list of STUPID things we (not me) have done is long, but I just have neither the room, nor the time to list them all. (Twitchy)

Robbers Get Surprise!

In Chicago (Rahm town) where the gun laws are TIGHT, and criminals should not HAVE guns, two gun-wielding robbers walked into a T-Mobile store, attempting to rob it. Instead, the store clerk pulled out his own LEGAL gun and shot them both, therefore putting one more nail in the coffin of the anti-gun fools, who tell us all the time that a “good guy with a gun” won't make any difference in gun crime. He shot one of them in the “family jewels.” Both fled after being shot, with the armed store employee in “hot pursuit.” The article doesn't say whether or not the crooks were caught, but you can at least bet they won't be robbing any stores for a while. T-Mobile allows CCW holders to carry their guns at work (they're smart that way) I'd bet robbers who pay attention will go somewhere else to ply their trade if they don't want to lose the “family jewels.” This is probably the best advertising against being robbed there is.(Chicago Tribune)

It's Obama's Failings!

People blame everything BUT the real reason for Trump's rise to the leadership in the GOP side, in the race for the GOP nomination to run for president. They say he's “too loud,” that he is too “thin-skinned,” and other nasty things. They TWIST everything he says to THEIR advantage. Example: SC Governor Nikki Haley in her “rebuttal” to Obama's “State of the Union” never even MENTIONED Obama (in any meaningful way), but took Trump to task for wanting to apply a “religious test” to immigration when letting just ANY Muslim in is tantamount to importing DEATH. She apparently can't figure that out, for herself (you liberals, now call me a “woman-hater”).

But it is Obama's FAILINGS as president that has resulted in the effort to elect a NON-POLITICIAN to the presidency. As to his being “too loud” or “too thin-skinned,” what the hell's wrong with that? OBAMA is “famously” thin-skinned, but doesn't really FAIRLY retaliate. He goes behind people's backs with IRS audits. But “firing back” with an “A-Bomb” is the kind of response we WANT in a president, not the TEPID “nasty notes” Obama sends when someone OUTSIDE the United States angers him. Trump doesn't NEED the money the GOP can offer an office-holder, so the GOP leadership wants no part of him, even to the point of supporting a DEMOCRAT! How damned STUPID is THAT? (Town Hall)

Why's Hillary Still Running?

I don't think we've ever before had a serious candidate for president with THREE or more congressional investigations and an FBI CRIMINAL investigation into her practices, who is STILL being taken seriously as a candidate. But then, that's not at all unusual for a Democrat. There are so many of them who are just like her in the Democrat Party (I call it the Democrat Party because there's nothing “Democratic” about it), just about anybody they pick will be in a similar position. If a REPUBLICAN had so many negatives in his background (and current-ground), he/she'd have long since been forced out because of the DIN Democrats would have raised.

Democrats are still pushing her enough to keep her NEAR the front. If she is indicted BEFORE she's nominated, MAYBE she'll be forced to drop out, once and for all. But I hope not. She'll be so easy to CRUSH in the election. So will Bernie and Whosis, but I'd like to see it happen to HER. Do I dislike the woman? Absolutely! What's not to dislike? She's never done anything good, and many things bad, many of which have gotten people KILLED—and she's LIED about it. She's almost as good a liar as is Obama. But at some point, we HAVE TO realize she's a CRIMINAL, and should NEVER be seriously considered for president, woman or not. Being a woman doesn't mean she should be automatically elected. There's a woman on the GOP side, too. But she's a “backmarker,” and nobody's crying about her being a woman. (Town Hall)

In Only One Quote

The article linked below says, “Everything You should Know About Socialism In 20 Quotes.” But why complicate things? I can give you ONE quote that is “everything you should know about socialism.” It is this: “Socialism is based on STEALING the fruits of the ideas and labors of a PRODUCER of new wealth for the benefit of those who can't, or WON'T create new wealth, and prefer to live at the expense of others.” (Quoting myself) If that doesn't tell you all you need to know, here's another. Their basic motto is this: “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED.” Making NEED a DEMAND on the earnings of those capable of earning, to benefit those INCAPABLE or UNWILLING to earn for themselves. Either of these quotes amply Illustrates the DISHONESTY of socialism, and all other forms of collectivism. (Town Hall)

Simple Logic

”I don't need a gun; I have never needed a gun; I hope I never need a gun; And in all likelihood, I'll never need a gun; However, should I ever need a gun, I'd better have a gun; therefore, I have a gun; And if the government ever says you don't need a gun, that's when you need a gun.” Obama says I don't need a gun while he runs around surrounded by ARMED guards while telling me having a gun will not protect me. I found this on Twitter, posted by a woman named Mia: “shooter's wife,” and it carried a logo, “Freedom Fighters." More logic: Why are there so many laws against owning guns when the Constitution clearly states, “The right of Americans to  bear arms shall not be abridged? What is it about "shall not be abridged" do they not understand? (Just common sense)

Do We Hate the Government?

Liberals like to say people like me “hate government.” We don't. We hate what government has BECOME under liberal “management.” We don't think gays should be able to “marry” each other, though we DO believe they should be able to make a contract between themselves SIMILAR to marriage, but should not be able to change the DEFINITION of marriage, which they seem bound to do.. We don't believe a minimum wage of $15.00 an hour WON'T cause more unemployment. We don't think Obama's announced “unemployment numbers” represent the REAL number of unemployed, since he's no longer counting those millions who have GIVEN UP on ever again finding a job and are no longer in the job market. We hate being forced to pay for Obama's “wild spending spree” that has added TRILLIONS to the debt this country owes. We hate having our right to self defense being limited while he imports hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists, under the GUISE of “Syrian refugees,” so they can kill us with ILLEGALLY-obtained guns. We hate a lot more than that, but I don't have room here to list them all, and I don't want to bore you. (Just common sense)

Audit the Fed!

Where the hell does the Federal Reserve, which is a private organization that has been CEDED so much power over our economy, get the right to REFUSE being audited? They should not have the power to BLOCK being audited, no more than any American citizen can block the IRS from auditing THEM. They continue to do so, as they have been doing, for years. What are they hiding? We should send in a SWAT-type team with orders to “clear the way” for a federal audit, with terms to assure there will be no obfuscation on the part of the auditors. But Obama hasn't the backbone to do that. (Tea Party)

An Increaase In Gun Violence?

That's what anti-gun fools say. They say if everybody is allowed to be armed, there'd be an increase in “gun violence.” They're right. But not in the way they imagine. There would be a TEMPORARY increase while armed honest people killed of the ILLEGALLY armed criminals who “didn't get the memo” and try to victimize them. Then it would end, when all the ILLEGALLY armed criminals are in boxes, underground. Then the honest people truly wouldn't need their guns. Those anti-gun fools really think honest people will “go nuts” and shoot each other over trifles. But the reality is, ILLEGALLY armed criminals do it, already. Which is why there IS so much “gun violence,” and will continue to be as long as the politicians keep us unarmed and defenseless. (Just common sense)

Watch Them Closely

Every day it seems, we hear of yet another case of an Islamic terrorist gunning people down or blowing them to smithereens somewhere in the world. And liberals politicians deny the evidence of their eyes and ears and say “It's not Islamic.” The latest, at this writing, is in Burkina Faso, Africa. But with Obama bringing hundreds of thousands of “Syrian refugees” in., many of whom ARE Islamic terrorists, even paying their way with OUR tax money, it's going to begin happening more often here, too. As witness the shooting of that cop in his squad car. If you can't remember where, it's because it has happened so often all over the country.

From New York to Las Vegas, and California. cops have been murdered in their squad cars everywhere. And Muslims all over wonder why we should be “watching them closely.” That's easy. It's because they're rushing to live among “unbelievers” (Infidels) even though the Koran tells them not to. Why? Because they want to make as much trouble for us as possible by suing us for imagined “slights” that they manufacture, even if they don't want to kill us themselves. And it's impossible to tell the “good Muslims” from the killers until they KILL somebody, and then it's too late. The only way to “get ahead” of them is to keep them under INTENSE scrutiny Let them whine all they wish, keep it up. It's NOT “religious intolerance” or “racism,” it's COMMON SENSE. (CBS News)

Mom Faces Ten Years

For what? For oversleeping and not walking her nine-year-old son to school. TEN YEARS! When I was nine, my brother and I both walked six blocks to and from school every day, and we survived. This is an excellent example of the insane things liberals have done to this society with their “pipe dreams.” They're now wanting to have somebody ELSE than the student or his parents pay for college tuition. Like a college education was an ENTITLEMENT. I never got somebody ELSE to pay for college for me. And nobody even SUGGESTED that somebody should. We were much smarter then. And my life has been pretty good without it. That's the main problem with this society today. Too many people want a “free ride” at somebody else's expense (they don't care who, as long as they don't have to pay for anything). That's how Russia became a communist country—too many people who wanted a “free ride” without having the bother of EARNING it. And the communists took advantage of that, and took over. (Survival Joe)

Dems Promote Sharia Law In U. S.

They're trying now to get a law passed in violation of the constitution to prohibit “hateful words toward Muslims.” Never mind “hateful words” are a constitutionally protected speech. Sharia gives Muslims the right to DECIDE what is “hateful words” toward them. The law would be so wide open, it would allow them to say ANYTHING is “hateful words toward Muslims.” If this law is passed, ANY group could punish ANYBODY who speaks against them. Outfits such as Nazis or the KKK, or even a politician. Allowing this is letting the Muslim “camel's nose under the tent,” and will result in sharia law being widely accepted by the fools that run this country. Muslims, of course, will jump on my mention of a camel as being racist, and "hate speech toward Muslims" so they won't have to argue on the real merits of this situation. (Tea Party Journal)

Al-Jazeera Shutting Down

Surprise, surprise! They spent billions of dollars to create a LOCAL propaganda source, and they lost. They really thought they could get enough Americans to view their propaganda, and use it as a “recruiting tool,” as they try on many other fronts. They didn't count on Americans being “wise to them” and staying away from their network like the plague. They made AlGore a billionaire, for nothing. But they don't really care. They steal more than that doomed venture cost them, every day. Good riddance to bad rubbish. Making Al-Jazeea popular would be like making a NAZI-based propaganda machine popular during WWII. That time, we were too smart. But this time, we were forced to let the market do it to them. I feel sorry for the Americans who went to work for them who lost their jobs, but that's what “consorting with the enemy” will get you. (Town Hall)

Just the Opposite

It's just the opposite of how things should work, according to the Constitution, which is the BASIS for ALL of our laws. Rand Paul, GOP presidential candidate, and still a Senator, has introduced legislation to stop Obama from VIOLATING the Constitution and ILLEGALLY trying to legislate by fiat on gun control. Something he hasn't been able to accomplish by conning the Congress. He still thinks he is superior to the Congress, when, according to the Constitution, which CREATED this government, he is NOT. Congress is a CO-EQUAL branch of government, and if it chooses not to act on his unconstitutional laws, they're not being “lazy,” they're doing their jobs. He is NOT “their boss,” and if they choose not to pass his pipe dreams into law, that's their RIGHT. This guy thinks he is some kind of a dictator, and he's wrong. Somebody needs to “slap him down (figuratively) and educate him on how things work in this country. (Bearing Arms)

Even Her Friends Don't Like Her

Debbie Wasserman Schultz was asked to resign by her chief opponent for the Democrat Party chairmanship. I know the PC Police want me to use another term for that, but that's the best one I can come up with without trying to walk upside down on the ceiling. In any case, I don't give a damn what the PC Police think. Word is, it's because of her ”standing tall” for Obama's anti-Israel policies. But others insist it is because she's also “standing tall” in support of murdering babies, and criticized young women for “not being strong in support of it, too.” Whatever the reason, I think it's a good thing for this frizzy, wild-haired bimbo to get out of the limelight so she'll stop embarrassing herself every time she opens her gob. Although any Democrat would be a bad choice. Go figure. (The Examiner)

"Religion" of Peace?

Islam still claims to be a “religion of peace.” It is not. And has never been. The number of people they have murdered and even beheaded is numberless. Religions, TRUE religions do not behead people and their practitioners don’t DELIGHT in it. If anybody questions Obama’s sympathy for Muslim atrocities, this should convince all but the most stupid. He continues to insist on sending $BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars to Syria so al-Qaida can use them to behead innocent people. Of course, they say NOBODY is “innocent” (except “believers," of course). And apparently they can get away with ANYTHING they do to “unbelievers,” according to the Koran. The “rise” of Islam is the best reason I can think of to allow all Americans to arm themselves so they can kill a few of these fools before they can kill THEM. (Barracuda Brigade) Sorry. Looks like somebody got to their provider and this page no longer exists, because Muslims didn't like it. But the facts on it were self-evident. which is what Muslims didn't like.

Well, I Predicted It

Just like Clinton (Bill) before him, Obama's next thing is to become Secretary General of the United Nations, where he can manipulate things so as to become King of the World. Clinton failed, and hopefully, so will he. The UN is a “toothless monster” under current management, and will remain so under Obama, if he ever makes it there. Except for the insufferable damage he can do to America. It seems he feels like his job of making America a “socialist partadise” is not yet finished,. And won't be in January, 2017. This fool has a head as big as all outdoors. He thinks he's the smartest man in the universe, and that will be his undoing, as people much smarter than him “take him down.” But, like that flea crawling up an elephant's leg with rape on its mind, his ambitions are much bigger than he can ever attain. He thinks the fools who bought him the presidency can do the same at the UN. But George Soros might have other ideas. If he does, Obama will be a goner. (Town Hall)

What's This?

James Woods says we need to get guns and learn how to use them. That this goes exactly opposite to what is usually preached about guns by the Hollywood “intelligentsia” is obvious. I wonder how many movie roles he will lose because of this. But he's exactly right. When a CRIMINAL comes to your home or stops you on the street and holds you up at gunpoint, what will you do if you have no gun to use to oppose him? What will you do if you're in a crowd and a gunman starts shooting into the crowd? Or when one of the MILLIONS of Islamic terrorists Obama is letting into America (many at taxpayer expense) comes to kill you? Anti-gun fools say everybody owning and carrying guns will cause an increase in gun violence—and they're right—for a while, while honest people “kill off” those criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists who are using their ILLEGAL guns to victimize them, and then it will become mostly non-existent. (Eagle Rising)

Everybody Hates Trump

Except the masses that fill his meetings, of course. Even Nicky Haley, governor of South Carolina, in her speech after Obama's “lie-fest” before Congress, otherwise known as the State of the Union. Apparently, she's “right on board” the “hate Trump” bandwagon. It's really strange to me how an entire political party (at least their leadership) would be against their own front-runner, even to the point of saying they'll vote for the DEMOCRAT front-runner if Trump gets the nomination. How STUPID is that? I guess they just don't want to win this election. What's their excuse? They say he's “not a Republican.” On what do they base that? The fact that he has never been in politics before? How about Dwight Eisenhower? He spent his career killing people and breaking things before he became president, and he is universally regarded as one of our BEST presidents. They just know they can't control him because he doesn't need their money, and CONTROL is what the party “bigwigs” are all about. (Hot Air)

Raats Leaving Sinking Ship

That's what's happening to Rahm Emanuel's ship. As mayor of Chicago, he has done as lousy a job as has his former boss (Obama) has done as president. He was “riding high” on a “wave of Democrat success” when elected, and has some of the TIGHTEST anti-gun laws in the nation, most of them unconstitutional, some of them already declared so by the courts. Despite that, he also was presiding over one of the HIGHEST gun death rates in the nation, again proving that the kind of laws liberals promote do NOTHING to reduce gun violence, and instead, PROMOTE it. Now, after suppressing a video showing a cop killing a teenager by shooting him in the back while he was walking away, then filling his corpse with 16 bullets, one of his own people is now making an attempt to get him recalled. It's going to take some doing, but it just might happen. (Conservative Tribune)

Trump to Reverse Actions

He says he will immediately REVERSE every one of Obama's “administrative actions,” especially the ones inimical to gun owners, as soon as he takes office as president. Gun rights people have SHOWN themselves to be as much in the majority as it takes to stall Obama's every action against gun ownership for American citizens, so why the hell WOULDN'T they elect Trump president? Jeb Bush recently CANCELLED an appearance at a gun show, claiming “problems getting there.” But we all know the reason: he is AFRAID to be “pro-gun,” as are most politicians.

He MIGHT “become” pro-gun” after being elected, but not before. He doesn't have the

gonads. Trump says, “You know Obama's going to make “Executive Orders” AGAINST the Second Amendment (which is unconstitutional, but what does Obama care about that?). And when Trump takes office, they will be reversed. Unfortunately, the guns Ofumble “confiscates” (steals) will be gone. He will have “disappeared them.” Texas told him to “come and get our guns,” which will not be an easy task, Other states too, have indicated their willingness to go against him. (Fox40)

When's the FBI Gonna Move?

Every day I hear a new revelation about Hillary's crimes, both as Secretary of State, and otherwise. But no charges. What is it going to take for them to actually MOVE against this criminal masquerading as an “honest politician?” (If there is such a thing, at least in the Democrat Party.) Her numbers of ILLEGAL e-mails are now in the THOUSANDS, and it is now KNOWN that she accepted “donations” (bribes) from people for whom she worked assiduously to benefit as Sec. Of State. She apparently ordered a staffer to strip the “classified” label from e-mails that WERE “classified” (that poor fool will probably go to jail before she does—IF she ever does!). What's holding them back? The fact that the Democrats really, really, want her to be their nominee? Is Obama himself holding them back to avoid a “stain” on the Democrat Party? Will they wait until she becomes president (doubtful)? If those crimes don't rob her of enough votes to allow the GOP to defeat her, I give up! The electorate will have proven themselves to be as “dumb as rocks” and deserve to get what they want. The only problem is that I, and others like me have to live through the stupidity. (Town Hall)

"Christian? No Guns"

The anti-gun fools have come up with yet another absurd claim: “You can't be a Christian and be pro-gun,” hoping to con Christians over to their side. But it won't work. People are too smart for that. Christianity does NOT bar us from self-defense. This is just one more effort to screw people out of their rights, that are guaranteed by the Constitution. Don't fall for the exhortations of these imbeciles. Evangelicals, who ARE Christians, are the strongest supporters of gun rights. Larry Pratt, who runs Gun Owners of America, is an Evangelical Christian, and he says ALL Christians should be armed, in self-defense. He says that self defense is a “God-given right.” The Constitution merely guarantees it. He personally saw the results of gun violence, all of it done with ILLEGALLY OWNED guns. It is those ILLEGAL guns that create just about all the “gun violence,” not the LEGAL guns owned by law-abiding people. There ARE a few examples of gun violence committed by legal gun owners, but they are absolutely in the minority. That is proved by FACTS. (Just common sense)

"Ready for War"

That's what that pudgy little dictator in N. Korea said in his New Year's message to his “nation.” He no doubt included America on his list of possible attackers. He really thinks he can “whup” us! That reminds me of a flea crawling up an elephant's leg with rape on its mind. If that fool has a death wish, this is the best way to accomplish it. He thinks N. Korea is “bullet-proof” because they weren't beaten in the last war with America. But N. Korea didn't “beat” anybody in that war. What beat us was our own politicians' refusal to do what was necessary to win. We certainly had the resources, but not the WILL. Liberal politicians opposed every proposition that WOULD have destroyed N. Korea, and forced “negotiations.” Which ended up in the “standoff” that remains to this day. (Just common sense)

And You Wonder Why?

Why we're wary of the hundreds of thousands of “refugees” Obama wants to allow to come here? Even those whose way he PAYS with OUR money? He's importing death and destruction for innocent, non-combatants, IN America. And he's either too stupid to know it, or that's exactly what he wants. The number of sexual assaults and other attacks by Muslim “refugees,” just on New Year's Eve in Germany alone, now numbers 500! And they were ALL committed by “Muslim refugees!” will Obama take notice of that and END his importation of death and destruction for Americans? Probably not. I think it's working exactly how he wants it. The more Muslim terrorists kill people in American the more he has an excuse to DISARM Americans, “for their protection, dont'cha know” This is the moist dastardly president we've ever had, and we need to “broom him” out of there before he single-handedly ENDS us. (Town Hall)

What WE Should Do

Saudi Arabia just executed 47 Islamic terrorists, including one Imam who was PROMOTING terrorism. They didn't just arrest them in put them into a special prison for a time, then release them to go back and murder more people. They CONVICTED them of terrorism, then EXECUTED them. Our policy toward Islamic terrorists is a JOKE. It does NOTHING to deter them from committing terrorist acts, and actually ENCOURAGES them. Frankly, when they're “caught in the act,” they should be killed on the spot. Not “taken into custody” and coddled for a few years, then released to kill again. I speak NOT of Muslims who have not committed crimes.Them, we should leave alone, but watch carefully.

They came here, even though their “Bible,” the Koran, tells them not to associate with unbelievers. They make as much trouble as they can, using our court system against us, with the ASSISTANCE of gullible judges and lawyers. But that doesn't necessarily rate a death sentence. But Muslim killers? They WANT to die, in the “service of Allah.” We should help them reach that goal, as soon as possible when they try and kill us. Forget imprisoning them for a while, then letting them go. Let them know that killing innocent people carries a PENALTY. It may not stop them, but when they're DEAD, they can't kill any more innocent people, including children. (The Blaze)

Not Legal, So Illegal

Obama can't legally take away our gun rights. He has tried, numerous times in Congress, and failed. He has even acknowledged that failure, saying, “My biggest regret in my administration is my failure to take America's gun rights away from them (My words, not his. He said it differently.).” There's no LEGAL way he can do that, so he's going to do it ILLEGALLY. What do laws matter to him? He has violated laws and the Constitution many times, and gotten away with it. Now he's going to try “the big one.” He forgets what happened the last time a government tried to take away America's guns. King George tried it, and he got a WAR. A war he LOST, against forces he THOUGHT would be easy to defeat, and which created this “free country.”

If Obama thinks he can succeed, even ILLEGALLY, he's got another think coming. No matter how much firepower he can command. Americans, most of which this country's military TRAINED. He can't beat a bunch of ragtag Islamic terrorists, and he SURE can't beat Americans. I'm just waiting for the rebellion to start, while America still has their guns. Guess who will be the first to go when that happens. There are always some stinky rear ends willing to trample on people's rights for a “taste of power,” but I'm betting there are many more Americans who won't stand for it, and they're still armed. Be afraid, Obama. Be VERY afraid! Real Americans are coming! (Town Hall)

How Many By Muslims?

Of 452 suicide attacks on innocent people worldwide last year, how many were done by Muslims? The answer is, 450! (All but 2!) And Muslims wonder why they're viewed with suspicion. They'll probably call this item “religious bigotry,” ignoring the facts, which show that Muslims are the biggest group of killers operating in the world. They think Muslims should be able to kill at will, without punishment. But they're not. Only in Muslim-run countries can they flout the law of reason with impunity. And even if they don't kill people (or not get caught, anyway), they still make as much trouble as they can, suing right and left for imagined slights and “offenses.” They demand “rights” that don't exist, like the right to pray while blocking the streets outside their mosques with their taxicabs. They demand time off to pray and a place to pray, when nobody else gets such “rights.” And they sue when they don't get it. They take jobs hauling alcohol, KNOWING that's part of the job, then sue when they get fired for not doing their jobs—and WIN in courts run by gullible judges. (The Blaze)

Gun Confiscation Begins

California made a law saying that they could confiscate guns from anybody that, in somebody's OPINION' was, or COULD BE a “danger to themselves or others.” All that was required was a special kind of “restraining order,” which has been handed out like candy to kids, all the time. Liberals keep saying “we don't want to take your guns.” Then they PROVE otherwise when they get enough power, which they usually do by giving out “freebies” like candy. That's what they're going to start doing in California January 1. The law allowing this is unconstitutional, but “following in the footsteps of Obama,” they don't care. By the time any case can come to the Supreme Court, they will have already “disappeared” the guns they have confiscated under this unconstitutional law, and nobody will be punished for MAKING IT. While many people will be punished for LEGALLY owning guns.  (Red State)

'Not Entitled"

The Supreme Court has ruled (in 1969) that seniors are “not entitled to Social Security." What? What IGNORANCE contributed to that decision? We're FORCED to pay into it at the point of a gun (You think that “gun thing” is wrong? You try and NOT pay in and see how quick the guns come out), but we're “not entitled” to get our money back (even without interest? They only pay you “out of the goodness of their hearts"). What damned fools are RUNNING things in the Supreme Court? Oh. I forgot. Many of them are liberals. The recent liberals in the white House have seen to that. I guess we're lucky for ANY decisions to go our way. I'm sure their decision is based on some “fine print” nobody noticed when the original law was passed, that politicians have only now revealed. (Just common sense)

Obama "Ended Two Wars?"

Obama likes to brag that he “ended two wars,” but he didn't. He RAN from two wars, but people keep dying there. There were 575 deaths in Afghanistan while the war was going on, under Bush. After Obama “ended two wars,” 1,663 people were killed in just Afghanistan, alone. THIS is “ending wars?” I don't THINK so! This is deluding yourself and attempting to fool the nation. That is the “legacy” that will be left by Obama. The practice of telling the world just the OPPOSITE of what is true. Lying to make yourself look better. But it “ain't workin'!” It might have worked back before the Internet, but real information is too free today. He can't get away with lying to us like politicians in the past. There isn't a thing a president does; not a thing he says, that isn't on video somewhere. That's why we have Obama himself talking about “my Muslim heritage,” and are able to know his narrative on the Middle East wars is PHONY. (Front Page Magazine)

Fire In Houston Mosque

Was it a “hate crime?” Unless you consider hatred by a Muslim for Christians, not even. The only “hate crime” committed there was in the media and the “Committee on Islamic-American Relations (CAIR), a known Islamic terrorist-connected organization in the United States. The media immediately tried HARD to connect it with the “extreme right” and “Muslim haters.” CAIR did the same. But when the arsonist was found, it was a MUSLIM who regularly attended this mosque. What his motivation was is not known for sure,. But I suspect it was to incriminate Americans, trying to blame them for the fire. And he got massive assistance from the media and CAIR. You can look for more cases like this, as Muslims work assiduously to make it SEEM like they're being “oppressed” unnecessarily, even though it was brought on them by the actions of other Muslims, or maybe even themselves. (Hot Air)

Press Lies to Incriminate Cop

They want the cop who killed Tamir rice prosecuted for murder, saying Rice was “open carrying.” he was NOT. And 12-year-olds are NOT included in those who CAN “open carry.” “Rice was concealing (not open carrying) a replica firearm by sticking it in the waistband of his pants under a loose-fitting hoodie. To carry a firearm in that manner, you must be 21 years of age, receive a minimum of 12 hours of handgun training (10 hours of classroom instruction and 2 hours of range time) from a certified instructor, demonstrate competency with a handgun through written and shooting tests, pass a criminal background check, and meet certain residency requirements.” The media clearly LIED so as to incriminate the cop, who had no way of knowing it war a REPLICA gun, which fired only BBs, if at all. It's part and parcel of the liberal media's attempts,. Both to impugn gun ownership in general, and the use of guns in their work by cops. (Town Hall)

Incompetence In Action

I've talked on many occasions about the incompetence of the politicians who have conned their way into important offices. Offices which they are NOT COMPETENT to hold. Think for a moment: if someone walked into a police station and started shooting everybody in sight, what would be the obvious answer? Disarm the cops and make them defenseless? Or see to it that they have sufficient arms to kill that shooter and save a bunch of lives? So two fools waltz into a concert hall and start shooting everybody in sight in San Bernardino, CA. So what is the answer to that? Disarm every citizen and make him/her completely defenseless? Not a bit of it. But that's what many politicians (most of them liberal Democrats) want to do. Disarm the populace as a means of self defense.

It is policies like these that make me say many politicians are INCOMPETENT. We need to make this an ARMED SOCIETY. As Robert Heinlein said, “An armed society is a polite society.” Normal human beings aren't going to “shoot it out” over trifles, as the anti-gun fools say we will. Gang members and other criminals already do that with their ILLEGAL guns. And there seems to be no way to keep them from getting them. So we have to make sure that when they attack somebody with their ILLEGAL guns, there are LEGAL guns there to oppose them. That's what COMPETENT people do. When that happened in San Bernardino, what did Obama do? He tried to disarm more people as a means of helping them defend themselves. That's the kind of incompetence I'm talking about. And there are many more illustrations of governmental incompetence, but I don't have room to list them all here. (ACRU)

Liberals and Freebies

This is why liberals (Democrats) seem to win so many elections. They appeal greatly to those who just want a “free ride,” and are willing to keep voting them into office, even though they make absurd decisions while giving away money that is not theirs. There are WAY too many of them in this society. That's what liberalism is: Socialism, and giving away other people's money. Taking from the PRODUCERS of new wealth, and GIVING that stolen to the DRONES of society who create NO wealth. It FEEDS off of those producers and ENCOURAGES those lazy people who want to survive without working. Bernie Sanders is an ADMITTED socialist, and Hillary is an UNADMITTED socialist. Both want to GIVE AWAY a college education, while I pay for it, even though I never got a paid college education. I didn't get one, PERIOD. And at the time, nobody thought anything about it. It was just the way things WERE. Before the liberals (socialists, Democrats) got hold of it. (Town Hall)

Big, Big Surprise!

Raising the minimum wage does NOTHING to reduce poverty! I'm not one who says, “I told ya so,: but, “I told ya so!” Who am I kidding, I AM one to say, “I told ya so” when liberals predictably do stupid things and it backfires on them, because I predicted it. Of course, they never acknowledge it, because they aren't intelligent enough. They're liberals, after all. Today, “liberal” is another word for “stupid.” A major factor in that is the fact that most people in poverty don't work. They're satisfied to be on welfare of one kind or another, barely supported by the government, without the necessity of actually DOING anything. People older than 19 working for minimum wage made terrible decisions in their life, or they wouldn't be working that cheap. You don't pay people more than they're worth. THAT would be stupid. And nobody but liberals are that stupid.

That brings up the second factor: raising the minimum wage creates UNEMPLOYMENT. When the law forces you to pay more than you can afford to pay, to people not worth more money, you make the common sense decision to work with FEWER employees, and ask those left to work harder. And they do, or they end up on the “fired” list along with the others. That's not being nasty, That's only common sense and good economics. When somebody brings up economic theory to me, my eyes “glaze over.” But this is EVIDENT. Some people say “just give them money,” which is just as bad, because that discourages learning how to EARN more money. People get MINIMUM wage because they're just ENTERING the work force, in a perfect world. But this is NOT a perfect world. It has liberals in it, and they worm their way into positions where they can IMPOSE their fool ideas on the rest of us. (Town Hall)

And You Wonder Why?

Muslim gangs in Europe are getting together and “gang raping” women. And the government wants to start classes to teach them that rape isn't acceptable in non-Muslim countries like it is in their own country. You just can't DO that here! Like that's going to stop them. Rape is a “cultural thing” for them, you see. And Obama is not only ALLOWING them in here, but is paying the way for some of them. And he really thinks his “gun laws” will keep them from committing atrocities here!. As their numbers increase here, the rape, murder, beatings, beheadings, etc. are going to increase,. Likewise. As I've said many times, Obama is INSANE. Certifiably, if he thinks crime rates aren't going to go up sharply as more and more of those “Islamic refugees” swarm in. I think increased violence is what he wants. That way, he can make laws he couldn't have made without it. Muslims are already creating chaos in our courts, USING them to make trouble for everybody who so much as LOOKS at them wrong. (Town Hall)

"Cruel and Unusual Punishment"

I thought the Constitution prohibited “cruel and unusual punishment.” Then why is a court freezing the bank accounts of a bakery that refused to “service” a gay “wedding?” Is stealing ALL their money and, in effect, putting them out of business, even if they were “guilty” of bigotry,” which they are not, right? There should be laws AGAINST such treatment of people by the courts on specious grounds. But there are not, and won't be, until we can get rid of ALL the liberals in places of power, such as this judge. Liberal judges are making a mockery of justice in cases such as this. There is no reason why they should be ALLOWED to do such things under the “no cruel or unusual punishment” clause in the Constitution, and many reasons why they should NOT. This “judge” should be removed from the bench for cause. (The Blaze)

Ungrateful Muslims

A liberal family in South Africa invited a number of Muslim “refugees” into their home in an abortive attempt to be helpful. They were “rewarded” by those Muslims driving them out of their own home and threatening to murder them. This is the kind of treatment you can expect from some Muslims. Some of them are too arrogant to be helped. They not only ASK for that help, they DEMAND it, and threaten people with DEATH if they don't give them exactly what they want. And people wonder why people don't welcome Muslims with “open arms.” They call those who don't give them exactly what they DEMAND “bigots,” “racists,” and “religious haters” or some such. I have nothing against Muslims, in general. I DO have something against Muslim “haters” who think ALL white people are against them, for NO reason. If they are against them, they have GOOD reason. (Conservative Tribune)

"GOP Will Undo Everything!"

Hillary is now saying, “Vote for me or Republicans will undo everything Democrats have done in the last eight years.” And that's supposed to gain votes for her? Talk about seriously misjudging the mood of the country! The GOP “undoing everything” is what the country WANTS! We're only waiting because it takes so long for ANYTHING to happen in DC that there's no point in impeaching Obama any more. His term would be over before it ever came up in the Senate. It takes forever when WE want it. But if the Democrats (liberals) want it, somehow it seems to happen right away. I'm not talking about today's Republicans, who raised the white flag over the latest budget bill that financed everything Obama wanted, including the murder of millions of innocent babies still in the womb (sometimes). I'm talking about the Republicans we're going to replace them with in the next elections. (Just common sense)

Kerry Is Insane!

He declared the “climate deal” as the “biggest accomplishment of the year.” Actually, it is the “biggest CON of the year,” that the liberals have pulled off. It has allowed AlGore to become even richer and Obama to become more powerful AND the government richer. It has conned many more millions out of Americans and promises to con them out of a lot more when the United Nations does its dirty work. Controlling any part of America has been the “wet dream” of the UN for years. And soon they'll have it with that limp-wristed piece of spaghetti sitting in the Oval Office. (That description has nothing to do with his sexuality (so the gay trouble makers can just shut up). It has everything to do with his wimpy way of running this country. Global warming (whatever name they have given it today to better con us) is the biggest, grandest SWINDLE ever to be perpetrated upon gullible people in the history of this nation, and it keeps getting bigger, due to the IGNORANCE of people like Kerry. (Town Hall)

Government Stupidity

Money is “fungible.” That means if you give someone money for one purpose it frees up money they already have to spend on what they want. We know that. If the Muslims get some money, it can REPLACE the money spent to prop up Islamic terrorists, so giving them ANY money is stupid. They'll spend the money they already had for subversive activities and REPLACE it with this money. Of course, they'll call this report “racist” or “religious intolerance.” that's their way of stifling ANY criticism, or any TRUTH being told about them. That's why they're HIDING behind a “pseudo-religion.” Would we have given millions of dollars to the Nazis during WWII? No; we were smarter then. We KNEW who the enemy was. But our idiot government has given $2,739,891 in grants to a SINGLE mosque in Kansas City. When we investigate, how much will we find they have given to other mosques? This particular mosque has KNOWN connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, which is a KNOWN Islamic terrorist-connected organization. Why they're allowed to continue operation in America, I can't fathom. I'll bet if they pull a surprise raid on that mosque, they'll find lots of guns and ammunition there, as France did when they raided some of their mosques. But, under Obama, they don't have the INTELLIGENCE to do something like that. (Daily Caller)

Proved Wrong. So What?

That's Obama's opinion. He uses previously DEBUNKED figures to back his ILLEGAL action to use powers he does not have to further limit our gun rights. He uses false figures all the time to back up all his ILLEGAL acts. This is the most LYING president, in history, and that takes a lot of lying. Especially with people like Bill Clinton on the list. For instance: one phony anti-gun outfit said that “seven kids are killed every day by gun violence.” That might be true if you define kids up to age 26 and include shootings between gang members with ILLEGAL guns. They said that there had been “100 school shootings since the “Sandy Hook killings.” Problem was, they included many shootings OUTSIDE of schools, NEAR them. Others were LEGAL guns being ACCIDENTALLY discharged. They also included “shootings” that never happened. That's how they got their “alarming statistics.” (Breitbart)

"The New, Young Black Man"

Actor and racist promoter Samuel Jackson is now saying, “Muslims have become the new young black men.” Which is an obvious attempt to allow him and other bigots to use criticism of Muslims to rail against the “treatment of black men.” Of course, this ignores the fact that Muslim extremists have been raping, beheading, and otherwise KILLING innocent people all over the world. It also ignores the fact that black men have been killing EACH OTHER faster than anybody else could kill them. They talk about cops killing black men, too, ignoring the fact that some of those cops were black, too, and many of the shootings were definitely justified. Like the one in Ferguson, MO, which is still being lied about, even after it ruined a cops life for defending himself against a giant thug. Remember, Jackson is the guy who “wished the killers in San Bernardino had been white,” so he could use it to condemn white people. They work HARD to make it LOOK like whites are killing blacks at an unprecedented rate, but just the opposite is true. They're killing each other. Of course, when we point this out, they call us racists, so as to stifle ANY criticism of black bigots. (Minuteman News)

"Muslim Who?"

Muslims weren't even on our “radar” until they started killing us for not believing in their phony “religion." The Muslim “religion” was NOT “under attack” until they started KILLING Christians and members of all other religions but Islam. And they wonder why people give them a hard time today. They scream “religious intolerance” every time somebody tells the truth about their abominable practices (among them screwing little boys and girls as a “cultural thing,” killing their own daughters for being seen with the wrong man, and the way they treat their women, in general). We don't tolerate “holding women down” and treating them badly as a matter of “custom.” They cry “racism” every time somebody talks about their medieval practices. They have CREATED any intolerance against them they see today, and it is NOT wrong to be leery of them since they spend a lot of their time making trouble for American Christians instead of “assimilating.” Their “Bible,” the Koran, tells them not to associate with Infidels, so why do they come here in such large numbers to live among us if they don't like our practices. They cite the"Crusades" as our attack against them. But the "Crusades" were IN RETALIATION for the outrages committed by Muslims then. (Just common sense)

Islamaphobia? I think Not!

Jews suffer religious intolerance FOUR TIMES MORE than do Muslims in the United States. The instances of “religious persecution of Muslims is so small it almost doesn't register on the gauge. “According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports: Hate Crime Statistics, 2014, there were 1,140 victims of anti-religious hate crimes in the U.S. in 2014. “Of the 1,140 victims of anti-religious hate crimes: 56.8 percent [56.8%] were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Jewish bias.” That amounts to approximately 647.52 instances where Jewish individuals, businesses or institutions were targeted. A mere “16.1 percent [16.1%] were victims of anti-Islamic (Muslim) bias,” amounting to approximately 183.54 instances where Muslim individuals, businesses or institutions were targeted.” So that pretty much proves they are LYING about “anti-Muslim acts." But then, they lie about just about everything, so what can I say? (From the Right)

Should You Call 911?

Anti-gun fools say so. But many police executives (who should know), including the chief of the DC cops don't agree, because they know you can be killed BEFORE they can even get there. “With officers laid off and furloughed, simply calling 911 and waiting is no longer your best option. You could beg for mercy from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back… You have a duty to protect yourself and your family. We’re partners now. Can I count on you?” That's what DC Police Chief Cathy Lanier said. The sheriff of Milwaukee County said something similar. Calling 911 is not an option when a criminal is staring you in the face holding a gun on you. You can end up DEAD if you even TRY. But if you have your own gun, you might survive. If there had been several people in that Paris concert hall with guns, maybe there wouldn't have been as many innocent dead. And there would have been fewer Islamic terrorists left. (Liberty Alliance)

No "War On Christianity?"

Many liberals laugh at you when you talk about a “war on Christianity,” but there IS one. They know it, but they deny it. It's REAL when people complain about the “Ten Commandments” being displayed, ANYWHERE. When fire departments FIRE their chief when he expresses religious tenets. When representations of the birth of Christ are protested in many places. When liberals make a scene when you wish them “Merry Christmas” and insist you say, “Happy Holidays.” My own nephew posted a “Christmas greeting” on Facebook, that read, “Happy Xmas to all.” As this kind of thing expands, Muslims rejoice. They're in the process of DESTROYING every vestige of Christianity in America.

And they're getting help from many Americans who allow MUSLIM vestiges where Christianity is not allowed. Like SCHOOLS, where children are forced to recite, “Allah is the only God” or get a failing grade. In schools, where children cannot learn about Christianity by law, while they can be forced to learn the Muslim “Five Pillars.” and to read the Koran (at least the “sanitized version” provided by the Imam). If telling the truth about Muslims is “Muslim hatred,” I'm guilty. Though I don't HATE anybody. I just have no use for their PHONY “religion” that was STARTED by a man who “married” a six-year-old girl—although he didn't have sex with her until she was NINE (he says). Pedophilia seems to be part and parcel of the Muslim “religion.” It's a “cultural thing” we're supposed to ignore. (Conservative Tribune)

So The Hell What?

Hillary LIED and said terrorists were using Donald trump in a recruiting video and, predictably, after she gave them the idea, they now ARE using Trump in a recruiting video. But so the HELL what? They would find SOMETHING to use in recruiting, so why not one of the FEW people actually talking about FIGHTING them? Should they stop talking about fighting them so they won't use our people's opposition in their recruiting videos? Should we stop saying anything against CRIMINALS, fearing THEY will use it in a propaganda video? Anybody who is worried about that is either STUPID or gullible, and a coward. (Minuteman News)

Can Bernie Beat Trump?

Not on his best day. Bernie is a committed SOCIALIST, and that doesn't work in this country. That's why people like Obama and Hillary deny to the death that they ARE socialists. The call it something else, so as to fool the gullible fools in the Democrat Party and SWEAR what they call it is NOT socialist. Bernie, at least, is “up front” with it. But that doesn't make him electable in a country that was made the fastest-growing country economically in the world by using the FREE MARKET. Some fools (like Bernie) still think socialism is the way to go, but they're fatally deluded. He says he will “convert” Trump's supporters to himself. Talk about a big laugh! This imbecile still thinks an economic system that is based on THEFT from producers for the benefit of NON-producers works. A fool like that has no business being president in the greatest non-socialist country on Earth. (Freedom Force)

Losing Cops Apace

It shows in Washington, DC, and it shows elsewhere. I'm sure it will be news soon, as cops find other work. Work that doesn't put targets on their backs. In DC, the number of cops on their force has dropped by more than 200 since Ferguson and Baltimore. And I'd bet the same thing is happening in Baltimore and even Chicago. You can't put targets on the backs of people who must go about in well-marked police cruisers, wearing uniforms with another shiny target on their chests. You just can't ask people to go out among the citizens when many of the citizens have ILLEGAL guns and will shoot you in the back as you go about your duties. It's illogical for HONEST people to want to get rid of the cops. Only those with criminal leanings would, and that's who is pushing this “Black Livers Matter” farce, and the KILLING of all cops. Having no cops will only cause anarchy, and even more people will get killed. Only criminals will benefit. It's already happening in DC, where, even though they boast that crime is at it's lowest in years, it is RISING. Fast. As are burglaries. DC Police Chief Cathy Lanier says that soon HALF of the “command staff” will be eligible to retire, and hiring is WAY down. Meanwhile, MURDERS are UP 50%. Hopefully, some of those murdered are among those pushing the idea of “no cops.” (Town Hall)

Chicago Airport Cops UNARMED!

And if attacked, they're instructed to RUN and HIDE! What the hell GOOD are they? All they are is “cannon fodder” if an Islamic terrorist or anyone else attacks O'Hare and Midway Airports. Whoever had the idea for this is an IMBECILE. They're a waste of money and many will DIE if somebody attacks that airport. A document published in support of this policy said this: “ 'We must also ensure that unarmed security personnel ... do not attempt to become part of the response, but could be invaluable to the evacuation efforts," the documents said.'.” In what way could they be “invaluable” to ANYTHING? Yes, they could help with evacuation of passengers—at the risk of their UNARMED lives. " 'We're not trying to replace the Chicago police officers; we just want to have the tools to do the job like every other law enforcement agency in the country,' said one officer who requested anonymity.”

Of course he requested anonymity. If they knew who he was, he would be FIRED, and maybe even subject to CHARGES in this “topsy-turvy” world we live in. “Wayne Black, a Miami-based security expert, said it's absurd to deploy unarmed trained police officers at an airport. The imbecile who did this, their “Chief,” Richard Edgeworth, wouldn't even TALK to reporters who asked WHY these officers were unarmed. Owen Kilmer, Deputy Communications director (mouthpiece) for the Chicago airports, said, “We think the strategy in place is working.” In what way is it working, Owen? In that none of your officers has been killed--YET? That very statement shows the level of INCOMPETENCE there. They're called a “force multiplier,” but they're a WASTE OF MONEY. Any cop who would submit him/herself to this is either a fool or is DESPERATE for a job. (Everything Lubbock)

Made To Order Weather

The weather these days is “made to order” for the global warming/climate change "religion." When it was found that the “globe” had not been “warming” for almost 20 years, the term, “global warming” no longer worked. People LAUGHED when they tried to attribute COLD weather to global warming. So they had to change it, so that ANY weather anomaly could be attributed to it. Enter “climate change.” Now, with unseasonably WARM weather in New York and its environs, coupled with extreme COLD in the West, plus ELEVEN tornadoes and massive floods in Texas, they now have things they can use to SWINDLE even more money out of gullible people who can be made to BELIEVE it is MAN-MADE “climate change.” What they don''t tell you is that it was WARMER on Christmas in 1959 than it was in New York this year. We don't remember that, unless someone who was paying attention at that time reminds us—and the global warming acolytes tell us they're lying and want to put ALL global warming “deniers” in prison or kill them. Anything to shut them up so they won't have to fabricate false “facts” to “keep up- appearances.” (Just common sense)

Obama In The Dark

They SAY they just can't figure out why so many Americans want to buy guns after they spent so much time talking about confiscating everybody's guns. Of course, when they come for their guns, they'll have to find out where they hid them. They know why, but they won't admit it. In addition to the USUAL criminal threats, and the threat of some fool walking up and shooting people randomly, Obama is importing hundreds of thousands of potential Islamic terrorists, who will no doubt bring their guns along with them, or buy them ILLEGALLY from another Islamic terrorist already here, who can supply them. There are so many “Infidel targets” here, and so few bullets. Translated that means “unbeliever” targets, which the Koran instructs them to kill or convert to Islam. Some don't follow these instructions, just as many don't follow the instructions given in the Bible (Of course, the Bible doesn't instruct them to KILL anybody for not “believing.”. But people want to have the means to defend themselves, and that's what Obama and his goons don't understand. And they don't care. (Guns 'n' Freedom)

It's Incrementalism

That's where the government takes away your rights in INCREMENTS, no single theft of your rights big enough to “move you to action.” You complain about it, and people like Obama call you a “whiner.” But, added up over years of such reductions in your rights, the loss of rights looms large—but you don't notice it, because it's always a SMALL reduction in rights at a time, “for your own good, dontcha know?” California has just passed a law that is a “small” loss of rights. Restraining orders are given out by the courts “like candy” to kids. But now in California now, ANYBODY who has a restraining order against them or who is “deemed” to be a “danger to him/herself or others” lose their constitutional right to own a gun. USING a gun illegally or actually COMMITTING a crime is not required. All that IS required is somebody's OPINION that you might POSSIBLY use a gun to hurt someone in the future. Next, it'll be anybody who has an auto accident (people who have accidents have bad judgment, ya know). Put all these tiny outrages together and you have a massive violation of the Second Amendment, I;m sure the anti-gun fools in other places are watching carefully to see if California gets away with it, so they can male similar unconstitutional laws. I remember back in the sixties the California law was such that you could not “project anything at a person in such a way as to hurt them” or you were in violation of their gun laws. I remember thinking that means I must register my FISTS, since that describes them. It may be the same today, I don't know. (Just common sense)

It's Not Religion, It's Attitude

Every time anybody says ANYTHING against Muslims, they scream “religious intolerance!” which is the reason why they “established: their “religion” in the first place—so they could STIFLE any criticism or TRUE reporting ot their strange ideas and practices. Our opposition to them is NOT about “religion.” It's about their ATTITUDE. They need an “attitude adjustment.” They come here to escape persecution, then try and persecute US! They hate pigs. So they want us to hate them, too. They're the most “religiously intolerant” people on the planet (that I know of). They don't like Christianity, so they want to KILL Christians for BEING Christians, The ones who don't particularly want to kill us, just STIFF us, for the most part.

They're so afraid somebody might want to take their women away from them that they insist that they go around wearing what can best be described as a TENT. The most minimal part of that is a head scarf so tied as to keep them from showing a single HAIR or their NECK. And they don't allow their women to go out without being accompanied by a male member of her family, natural, or by marriage. And they KILL their own daughters if they're seen talking to the wrong man. They NEVER “assimilate.” They insist WE change to suit THEM. They're a constant source of TROUBLE, they're always suing over some imagined slight. And when they breed (like rabbits) and emigrate enough Muslims to make a difference by VOTING, we're in BIG TROUBLE. They have openly TOLD us that's what they plan. And they're coming in a hundred thousand at a time, with Obama's help, physically, and financially. (Just common sense)

Christie Pardons Marine

A Marine recruiter was arrested when he inadvertently drove into New Jersey with an UNLOADED gun in his glove compartment, which he forgot was there. The cops arrested him during a stop for failing to use a turn signal, one of the tiniest offenses in the books when they found that gun shut up in his glove compartment. What the hell they were doing going through his car on such a MINOR stop is beyond me. They're never get to search MY car that way, whether I have a gun or not. It's none of their business unless I'm using it to commit a crime. They probably intimidated him by telling him refusal to allow a search would make him seem guilty of something. That would never work on me. If they want to search my car, EVER, they're going to have to get a warrant. And if they hold up my movements until they get one, they'll be getting a huge lawsuit. I will OWN their agency. Christie “righted a wrong,” and for that, I commend him. (Breitbart)