What FOOLS They Be!

Louis Michael Feldman, Professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University ought to be fired for STUPIDITY. While introducing him, they asked, “Is the Constitution worth the reverence in which most people hold it?” What an abysmally STUPID question that is! The Constitution, flawed though it may be, is the only thing standing between you and the slavery people like Obama envision for us. Yes, I know Obama and many others (mostly Democrat/liberals) ignore it on a regular basis with impunity, but its very existence has a “slowing effect” on their wishes to enslave us. That’s because the founders didn’t think to include a PENALTY (other than reversal by the courts if the person ignoring it does not OWN that particular court) for violating it. But to eliminate it (if that’s possible) is to leave us to the “mercy” of people like Obama, who wants to make this country the next “showcase country” for socialism (as long as the money they can steal or print lasts).

Obama is the guy who says, “Only Fox News and Rush Limbaugh stand in the way of a COMPLETELY ‘compliant’ media.” He doesn’t even understand that this is NOT something WE want; it is only a “would-be-dictator” who would wish to COMPLETELY control the media. Yet he comes right out and SAYS that, as if “owning” the press was a “good thing” for a president. A media who “keeps him in line” is a BULWARK against tyranny, and he knows it; and wants to eliminate it completely. And he doesn’t care if we know it. This is the guy who has STOLEN $trillions of our dollars, right out in the open, first by taxing us unmercifully, then by printing $billions of dollars in “funny money” with nothing valuable behind it. This is the guy who JAILED the producer of a movie he falsely blamed for the deaths of FOUR of our embassy personnel in Benghazi, Libya, to keep his LIE about al-Qaida being beaten from becoming obvious. He knows NOTHING about ANYTHING, but he wants us to think he knows about EVERYTHING and should be able to run everything. (CBS Sunday Morning)

The Wrong Solution

Politicians have, for as long as I can remember, ALWAYS chosen the wrong solution to our problems. Most notable of those wrong choices is in “gun control.” ANYBODY with a modicum of intelligence knows you don’t defend yourself by DISARMING yourself. Thus, making laws that only apply to people who do not break laws is useless. Yet everything they do does NOTHING to stop CRIMINALS from having guns because criminals do not obey laws. Another wrong solution is the one put forth to “solve the revenue problem” in Washington. Again, intelligent people know you don’t raise taxes in a recession; and that raising taxes does NOT increase the amount of revenue coming into the government,. Just the opposite, in fact. I’m just an “average guy” and I know that. So why don’t our incompetent politicians know?

Maybe it’s because they just want to run things, and making things worse gives them an opportunity to eliminate more of our rights while claiming to be “trying to solve the problem,” whatever that “problem” may be. Strangely, those “solutions” do nothing to “solve the problem” they are supposed to solve; and nobody seems to notice, except for people like me. Never try and point out to a politician (mostly Democrats) the “error of his ways”; he’ll just call you a name and ignore you. Illustration: the “global warming” fiasco. If you rightly disagree with AlGore’s false pronouncements, he calls you an “unbeliever” and goes right on preaching his nonsense. There are many more illustrations of incompetent governing, the best known is the fact that we’re ALWAYS in some kind of a “panic” and nothing ever gets “solved.” When are we going to get rid of these fools and get some politicians that AREN’T incompetent? Or maybe that there aren’t any. (Just common sense)

All They Can Think Of Is Guns

Every time somebody commits a mass shooting, all our INCOMPETENT “leaders” can think of is “BAN GUNS.” They’re all about “getting rid of guns.” They don’t even THINK about the SHOOTERS. Some people “give lip service” to improving mental health. But what they really want to do is BAN GUNS. That’s ALL they’re interested in. People like Wayne LaPierre (perennial VP of NRA) says there should be an armed cop in every school, but even a NON-uniformed one costs a lot of money because that will be all he/she does. Simply ALLOWING one or more STAFF to be armed and TRAINED costs a lot less and would work well. But they ridicule that, saying that staff member would be a “source of danger.” When are these incompetent people going to WAKE UP and get rid of the “no-gun zones” that are an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to come in and shoot up the schools? (Just common sense)

NRA: "More Guns For Good guys"

As predicted, the National rifle Association (NRA) recommends “more guns in the hands of good guys” to protect our children from the “guns in the hands of bad guys.” He asked if you should have guns in the hands of good guys ten minutes away (as with calling the cops) or a gun in the hands of a good guy standing beside the bad guy (like a teacher)? The cops are always at LEAST ten minutes away and this “bad guy” can kill a lot of people in just a few minutes. The shooter in Newtown, CT killed all 26 people, including 20 CHILDREN in 3-1/2 minutes. Had there been a “good guy with a gun” there, that number could have been a lot smaller when that “good guy” put a couple in his head” as soon as he started shooting. The “anti-gun freaks” have always ridiculed this idea, but it is the ONLY idea that can be successful in dealing with these indiscriminate shooters.

An armed civilian is NOT as crazy as are these shooters just because they aren’t cops. This is the solution I have recommended all along. But nobody (in charge) is smart enough to take me up on it. Wayne LaPierre, perennial vice president of NRA, recommends armed police officers in every school—which is pretty much what they have now. But these officers are usually IN UNIFORM, which makes it easy for potential shooters to “take them out” FIRST, from ambush. I say they should be in civilian clothes, and people not suspected of being armed so a potential shooter cannot “single him out” and eliminate him before “doing his dirty deed.” Schools should NEVER be “gun-free zones.” That is an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to shoot them up. (Huffington Post)

Another "One-Note Song"

Obama has assigned one of the worst “anti-gun fools” in his administration (besides himself, that is), Joe Biden, to be in charge of a commission to “address gun violence” in this country. What that means is Joe must come up with more and better anti-gun laws and ways to BAN GUNS. It doesn’t matter that NO amount of gun banning will keep guns out of the hands of criminals who wish to use them to commit crimes. All they will do is CONTINUE the practice of DISARMING honest people and keeping them from being able to defend themselves. Even Megyn Kelly of Fox News says Biden’s commission will “strike fear” into the NRA. Not even! The NRA knows the best way to approach “gun violence” and no amount of stupidity by Biden is going to “strike fear” into them. (Minute Man News)

Opening Bid: "I Fold"

Ann Coulter says that’s what Senator Rubio’s plan for amnesty for illegal aliens is. He SAYS he is demanding border control, but his plan gives AMNESTY to ALL illegal aliens now in this country with nothing there to force Obama to actually carry through on border control, something he has pledged not to do (and we all know how faithful he is to keep the promises we don’t like). It’s the old con to give your opponent what he wants now while PROMISING do deliver something in return LATER. Later never comes. You’d THINK our politicians would stop “falling for” this con, but they don’t. They’re incompetent. Rubio needs to learn this. I like Rubio on most things; but I don’t like him on this. We did something similar in 1966. Reagan was promised they would “secure the borders” if he would give AMNESTY to the millions of illegal aliens then in the country. He did. And you know just how well they “secured toe borders.” (CNS News)

Always The Wrong Solution

Every time a “panic” erupts in Washington, the first thing they do is make it worse. Take the “problem” of gun violence, for instance. Some guy with an illegal OR legal gun does a mass killing and what do they want to do? DISARM innocent people so the criminals will not face a gun in the hands of their intended victims. The air is polluted, so they stop all drilling everywhere they can and keep as many companies as they can from drilling. This, of course, does NOTHING to solve the air pollution “problem,” but who cares? It lets them control us more. They don’t care about “solving” such problems. But they DO give them a chance to tighten their control over the populace.(Just common sense)

The Very First Income Tax Form

This is the very FIRST federal income tax form. Their very first attempt, and it is as confusing as hell. The worst part about PAYING income tax is the confusing forms. This was very confusing, and they’ve had many years to make it even more confusing. I think they DELIGHT in complicating things to the point where we have to PAY to have someone ELSE figure it out for us because NOBODY understands it, not even the people who WROTE it or those who voted it into law. I’ve never been able to make “hide nor hair” of it, and I think they PLANNED it that way. Many people gave up on figuring it out many years ago and just didn’t ask for any of the money deducted from their pay back. They figure it’s “lost money” and don’t even try. (IRS First Form)

Obama's "One-Note Song"

Obama has ONE NOTE in the song he sings. His jealousy toward people who EARN a lot of money by being ORIGINAL in their ideas and come up with things lots of people want to buy thus becoming rich tells him to STEAL as much as he can from the PRODUCERS of society and give that STOLEN to the NON-producers (MOOCHERS) in this society (never mind he is in that group after writing is lying books). His “one note” is the COMMUNIST song sung by Vladmir Lenin, which resulted in 75 years of misery for Russians when he fooled them into allowing him to impose his COMMUNIST rule upon them. Yes, I know, some FOOLS “tune me out” when I mention such “outdated” words as COMMUNISM and NAZIISM because they THINK those words have no meaning any more. But they do. They represent the fact that collectivists are STILL trying to impose collectivism on us under a different name. They have FAILED for many years because we had (HAD) too many intelligent people in this country to fall for that foolishness. All that has changed for the worst.

The results of the last election show that there are more people now who only want a “free ride” and are willing to watch this country “go down the tubes” than there are of people who realize that doesn’t work,  as long as it doesn’t affect them because they are the RECIPIENTS of the government’s “free rides” at the expense of the PRODUCERS (people who WORK for a living). He constantly intimates that “the rich” somehow STOLE their money from THE POOR. How do you steal from people who HAVE NOTHING? It doesn’t make sense. This is what Obama is selling. But that has never stopped liberals before. They constantly convince the IGNORANT of things that don’t make sense and win election after election on the basis of LIES. A good example of the IGNORANCE of his constituents is a woman who once told me flat out not to say anything bad about Obama because she liked him. That was in the first year of the misery he has caused. She still feels the same way. This is the woman who has two stickers on her car, side-by-side: one talks about freedom of speech and the other says, “Get rid of Fox News.” She has no idea of the contradiction those stickers represent.  I talked to her about that contradiction so she covered ONE up with an Obama sticker. This represents the intelligence level of the people who re-elected him for another four years so he can “finish what he started.” Turning this country into a socialist country. (Just common sense)

Schools "Infiltrated" By Socialism?

 The opening sentence in this article reveals a massive naïveté and ignorance on the part of the writer. This writer marvels at the fact that socialists have “infiltrated” the Texas school system. But the socialists “infiltrated” the school system all over the nation many years ago. They’re just becoming more arrogant and are not keeping it a secret as well as they used to. Now they’re actively having 6th graders designing flags for the “coming socialist state.” At the same time they’re teaching them about the “benefits” of socialism, lying all the way. That’s because the only “benefits” to a socialist state are to the leeches of society who want to live at the expense of others, without the bother of working, themselves. They’ve been subtly teaching this in government schools for a long time, subverting our way of governing, with the active assistance of liberals in government. Now they’re just “coming out of the closet.” With a socialist president and all the socialist people he has “appointed” to his administration, they think they need no longer hide their subversion. So it’s becoming more noticeable. Further, the very teachers they want to teach it are calling it “criminal” and “borderline un-American.” (EAG News)

Who Cares?

Who cares if Obama is a “skeet shooter?” I don’t, and I’d guess that 98% of Americans don’t give a damn, either. But one reporter brought up the existence of a photo of Obama “skeet shooting,” and they decided to provide one, just to give us something to argue about and keep our minds off his crimes; and he is guilty of many. I don’t “skeet shoot,” and neither do most Americans. And owning guns is NOT about “skeet shooting.” It’s about SELF-DEFENSE. Against ANY criminals who come to steal our property, even if they’re wearing badges. That was its purpose, regardless of ANY attempt to say it is NOT. As to that photo, it doesn’t prove ANYTHING except this administration is willing to “Photoshop” a photo that LOOKS like he might be “skeet shooting,” even though it is obvious he is NOT. To “shoot skeet,” he would be aiming upward. Not straight forward, as he seems to be in this phony photo unless he is a lousy shot, which he probably is. The point its, whether or not he is a skeet shooter is an unimportant thing, and not worth the time and money that has been expended on the question. (Freedom Outpost)

Obama Recruiting Jihadists

The Muslim American Society (MAS) and the Islamic Circle of North America both have connections to Islamic terrorism. Mark Ward, the Deputy Special coordinator in the State Department’s Office of Middle East Transition (puff, puff) is in charge of recruiting Muslims for the State Department. MAS is known to be the U. S. “branch” of the Muslim Brotherhood, which also is the “parent organization of HAMAS and al-Qaida. Connections to terrorists notwithstanding, he is charged with recruiting Muslims and was there to hold a 90-minute seminar at which he is supposed to recruit from those present. It’s like recruiting Nazis for the State Department during the Second World War. Hillary Clinton even signed a “special order” to allow him to recruit and to allow the reentry of two radical Islamic academics whose terrorist ties long banned them from the U.S. This is the kind of thing Obama’s people are doing. Actively recruiting known terrorists to work for the United States government, and doing so at gatherings of KNOWN terrorists. This tells me Obama is either STUPID or is definitely a Muslim terrorist sympathizer, if he isn’t actually a Muslim terrorist, himself. We’re not only allowing him to gut our military and destroy our economy, we’re letting him recruit KNOWN Islamic terrorists to help him do it. this FOOL needs to be IMPEACHED. Sooner, not later, before he can do us any more damage. (Judicial Watch)

Don't Fall For It!

One of the oldest scams (cons) the Democrats use to con Republicans into tax increases is to promise SPENDING CUTS “some time in the future.” But after the tax increases, the future spending cuts never come. This scam was used on Ronald Reagan and George Bush (the older) that I know of, and it cost Bush re-election. It also gave the Democrats the right to say Reagan raised taxes, too. I don’t know how many times it was used on Bush the younger, but they spent a lot of money and raised taxes a LOT during his administration. It’s like the old “Peanuts” strip where Lucy cons Charlie Brown into kicking the ball, then pulling it away as he kicked it, causing him to fall down. They pull it time after time and politicians on both sides fall for it, almost by rote. Obama is trying it right now on the Republicans—and the Republicans are showing signs of falling for it again. (Just common sense)

Taking Your Guns

You think they’re not going to take your guns? they already are. Look at this story: Robert Adams, of Albuquerque, NM, was a gun collector and a licensed gun seller. He owned 1,500 firearms of different kinds. That frightened the feds (If he could find 1,500 people to shoot them). Anyone who had that many guns COULD be a definite danger to politicians who want to take what is yours. So, with the assistance of the local sheriff, they raided him and STOLE all his guns after “investigating: him for years. I say STOLE because they really had NO reason for taking ALL his guns. It is said that verification of his license to sell guns has not been shown, but that’s no reason to “swoop in” and take his guns. The Constitution says “The right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT be infringed” (Forget that “militia” crap. the “militia,” when the Constitution was adopted, was “ALL the people.” There was NOT such a thing as a “state-authorized militia” then).

They had no “charges” to file against him, although, like most feds, they “mentioned” several things of which he was “suspected.” Though none rose to the point where they could charge him with any crime. So they just STOLE his guns without cause, which put a huge financial detriment on him. Among the things they CLAIM they were “investigating” him for is gun smuggling, tax evasion, and violation of importation laws. Unfortunately for them, they could prove NONE of this. So they raided him and just TOOK his guns and put him out of business—for NO reason, except his guns frightened them. And they’ll come after YOUR guns one day too, as they get to everyone. They’re very good at making it SOUND like the people from whom they STEAL are “breaking the law,” when they are NOT. Let this be a warning to every gun owner in the land. They WILL eventually come after your guns, and they don’t NEED a real charge to lodge against you. They’ll just come and TAKE them, as they did here. (Freedom Outpost)

I'm Gonna Say It Again

Again and again until it sinks into the feeble minds of all those FOOLS who blame the GUN when some ignorant FOOL takes a gun and kills a bunch of innocent people they find in bunches. We need more people in those groups with “carry permits.” People these “shooters” don’t know are there, who can shoot them before they can kill more than one or two people. Getting rid of guns isn’t going to solve the problem. Guns EXIST. You can’t “uninvent” them. “Bad guys” will ALWAYS be able to get their guns while people who OBEY laws won’t. If Frank DeAngelis, principal at Columbine High School, had had a gun when he “looked around a corner and watched one of the shooters killing people” he could have “put a couple in the head of the shooter” and ended at least that one shooter’s “kill score,” then go after, and kill the other. As it was, all he could do was “hide and watch” as the shooter murdered students and teachers. One of these days we MIGHT find a COMPETENT politician who will realize this and put a stop to “no gun zones,” which are “open invitations” to shooters who want to spray bullets into crowds of people. (Just common sense)

Dems Continue to Lie

 Harry Reid, “boss man” in the Senate for Democrats says that “We’re still growing.” Don’t think just because the economy CONTRACTED, we’re not. Reduced government spending caused by the MINORITY Republicans (when Obama wasn’t looking”) caused that “contracting of the economy.” But there is NOT any “reduced government spending.” There hasn’t been for many years. Government spending has constantly gone up, along with taxes, for as long as I can remember that’s a typical Democrat LIE. And they expect people to actually BELIEVE that. The bad part is that those who “don’t pay attention to politics” until just before an election when the lies are flying in all directions WILL believe it. A good example is that woman I told about who had two bumper stickers on her car: one pushing “freedom of speech” and the other pushing “shutting up Fox News.” I brought that contradiction up to her and now she has covered one of them up with an Obama sticker. That shows a complete lack of understanding of what’s going on, but she’s very faithful to that criminal in the White House. Who is causing ALL the problems. You can’t argue with her. She is “tone deaf.” (Just common sense)

Libs Say "More Armed Guards At Schools"

The Fox News' best-known liberal, Alan Colmes, the one who was “bounced from the Hannity and Colmes show and is now only a “radio host,” says the answer to school shootings is “more guards.” What KIND of guards? ARMED guards in uniform, so a potential shooter can locate them first and kill them before killing other innocent people? What they NEED is more teachers, principals, janitors, and the like with “carry permits” who can “put a couple in” a potential shooter before they can kill more unarmed innocent people. Like happened at that church in Colorado Springs, Colorado when a crazed killer came in without knowing she was there. They CALL her a “security guard,” but she wasn’t. She was a parishioner who happened to be legally armed, and who they ASKED to “act” as a security guard. But the thing that allowed her to kill this shooter is that he didn’t know there was anybody there who was armed. And that was the “secret.” (Just common sense)

And So It Begins

 The Islamic terrorists and the drug cartels keep those who would investigate and arrest them, and prosecute them afraid to do their jobs by killing them off, one by one. The most dangerous job in “drug country” or “terrorist country” is that of a judge; or a prosecutor; or a cop. The “bad guys” target them and show they can be “gotten to” if they become too much of an impediment to those criminals’ operations. Soon these people are afraid to do ANYTHING to oppose these criminals so they won’t be killed. A deputy prosecutor in Kaufmann County, Texas was ambushed and shot to death on his way to work. The killers are yet to be found. They're studying his caseload to see if the shooters are connected to a current case. (KHOU)

Indictment of Gun Control

A legal immigrant recently testified before Congress and made this statement: “"If gun control actually did work, Washington, D.C. and Chicago would be the safest cities in your nation..." That is a really profound statement, but will fall on deaf ears in Washington. He also said, “Nobody saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late.” Another profound statement that they will not hear. Politicians have “selective deafness” that allows them to disregard ANYTHING that doesn’t promote THEIR agenda. Ong noted this: “Had the Koreans in the LA riots not had AR-15s and AK-47s with 30-round magazines — and Ruger 30s — their businesses would have burnt to the ground like all the other businesses in their neighborhoods. Theirs stood because they stood their ground.” This man sees things better than any politician out there, but will be ignored. (The Blaze)

Praised for Not Making A Profit

One of the STUPIDEST things liberals push is the whole idea that there should NOT be a reason for ANYBODY to make a profit in business, which is one of the most foolish notions I’ve ever seen. Profit is the ONLY reason people get up in the morning and go to work. Otherwise, they’d just stay in bed and smoke pot—or do drugs—or just have sex with either their boyfriend or girlfriend, or both. They ask why a DOCTOR should make  profit for “curing you.” They completely ignore the fact that this doctor spent years of his life and THOUSANDS of dollars to learn HOW to be a doctor, so his e3fforts wouldn’t kill you. Hospitals likewise. They have to make a profit so they can afford all those expensive machines and other equipment they use to diagnose what is WRONG with you.

EVERYBODY has to make a profit or it’s not even worth it to get out of bed in the morning. Profit is what “lubricates” the “wheels of commerce.” Without it, this country would collapse. The very people who SAY people shouldnb’t make a profit make a profit themselves. They don’t work for nothing, even if they’re working for a “non-profit.” They get paid a salary and you can BET those RUNNING that non-profit do. They HAVE to, or they would starve. Amazon is now being praised for selling their products at a price that makes in IMPOSSIBLE to make a profit. Their profits are down 45% and their stock is going sky-high because stupid people are buying it. and why do people buy it? To make a PROFIT, of course. But if the company makes no profit for very long they’ll go “belly-up.” It amazes me that some otherwise intelligent people will think this way. Sheesh! (Rush Limbaugh)

Same Old "Bait & Switch"

They use the same old “bait & switch con over and over and our incompetent politicians fall for it every time. Even INTELLIGENT politicians have fallen for it. They promised Reagan they’d “cut spending” one and a half dollars for every new dollar in taxes he allowed. He allowed the taxes and no spending cuts EVER materialized. Bush (the elder) said, “Read my lips, no new taxes.” Then they made him the same promise so he let them raise taxes. But again, no spending cuts. So he lost his job. Now Obama himself is using it on Congress. He’s telling Congress if they will let him raise taxes, he will cut spending later. Never happen. Mark my words. And guess who will suffer? You and I, who had no say in it. (Just common sense)

Timely Increasae in Gun Violence

Does it seem to you there are more incidences of gun violence today than before Obama started talking about “ending gun violence,” which is code for “banning guns?” The gun violence didn’t begin with the Sandy Hook school shootings; it didn’t begin with Columbine, either. Nor Ft. Hood, where a proud Islamic terrorist who happened to be in the military killed a bunch of people. It began in the 1800s when a man went into a school to shoot the teacher and was killed by the children in the class, all of whom were armed. NONE of these incidents took place where it was legal for everybody to carry guns, but that little fact escapes our incompetent politicians, who only want to DISARM honest, responsible people so they can’t defend themselves. I’m not a “conspiracy theorist,” but some things like the sudden increase in gun violence at just the right time to help the “anti-gun Nazis push their favorite cause do not escape my attention and give me reason to suspect that certain “anti-gun extremists” just might be helping some of these fools who want to shoot up innocent people to do so, even ENCOURAGING them to help Obama “cry wolf” about “gun control, as if banning or more tightly controlling gun sales and ownership WOULD do anything about it. All those laws do is DISARM honest, responsible people who OBEY laws, while leaving them to be “easy prey” for CRIMINALS, who don’t. Think about it. (NRA)

...And Obama Went to Bed

He just doesn’t care that his ambassador in Benghazi was dead or dying. He know it within 90 minutes—and went to bed. This shows that he just doesn’t give a damn, and that puts the ambassador’s blood on his hands along with the future murders to be committed by the terrorists he releases from GITMO. Does he really think he can remain  in charge if he keeps doing despicable things like this? Who does he think he is? Hugo Cahavez? This arrogant fool doesn’t even care if Americans know about the STUPID things he does. Can it go on much longer before somebody does something about it (To those government agents monitoring my blogs, I don’t mean I would do something about it)? Only the worst kind of damn fool would think that. But this government is FULL of such damn fools, starting at the top. (Freedom Outpost)

"Gun-Free Zones"

Except for those carried by criminals and crazies wanting to shoot everybody in sight, that is. People who obey laws obey gun laws. Criminals don’t. Recently, such a fool murdered 19 CHILDREN, some as young as 5. the day before that, another killed at least two people in another shopping center. The news media went “wall-to-wall with it. In Denver, at least one radio station spent the entire DAY into the night talking about it. I’m sure this happened all over the country, maybe even the world. And they should, because somebody killing a bunch of CHILDREN is a real tragedy. What did these two shootings gave in common? They were both “gun-free zones.” But what about that shooting last year in a GUN SHOP where the guy shot a clerk and was instantly made into “Swiss cheese” by the rest of the clerks, including the one he shot? It was a news item for a few hours and then “sank like a stone.” Except for the Indianapolis media, nobody was interested in the story. Why? Because the victim was armed and able to defend himself. Even the “anti-gun crazies” shut up about it because this kind of story, where the victim was armed just didn’t fit their narrative. I’ve always noticed that such shootings didn’t happen at gun shows or anywhere else where everybody was armed, and for a good reason. In “gun-free zones” like schools and the like, they might as well put up a sign saying, “No guns here. We’re defenseless. Come on in and shoot us.”

Yes, such shootings are bad. But trying to eliminate guns to stop them is illogical and STUPID. The GUN didn’t kill these people. The man HOLDING the gun did. You don't blame the HAMMER for hurting the nail. If he couldn’t get a gun (doubtful) he’d find something else to use in killing innocent people. Anybody who BELIEVES that a CRIMINAL, who violates the law for a LIVING, will OBEY a law saying he can’t be armed is STUPID. And that includes all those stupid politicians who think so, including our illustrious President Obama. I’m getting very tired of repeating this and having it fall on deaf ears while more and more people DIE because of this rampant STUPIDITY. I’m still waiting for our incompetent politicians who WAKE UP and realize that the ONLY WAY to eliminate such atrocities is to allow as many GOOD people as possible to be armed, including in those ubiquitous “gun-free zones” for self defense so the crazies and criminals won’t be FREE to kill innocent people. It is a PROVEN FACT that where there are MORE GUNS in the hands of innocent people, violent crime goes DOWN. In Florida, where getting a carry permit is easy, the violent crime rate has PREDICTABLY gone DOWN wile the deaths and injuries to armed CRIMINALS has gone UP. There cannot be more OBVIOUS evidence this is true. But our anti-gun politicians are blissfully IGNORANT of this fact. They’re PURPOSELY ignorant of facts that do not advance their narrative. (Mail.com)

We're Being "Ruled" By Morons

That’s what Rush Limbaugh says, and he’s right. The morons who are “ruling” us now mostly think collectivism (socialism) is the way we should go, and they’re wrong. Socialism, in its many forms, (communism, socialism, Fascism, Naziism, Progressivism, another name for communism) has failed each time it has been tried, eventually. Those that still exist are dependent on the others loaning them money from what they have left. They DEPEND on the earnings of the free market to give them money to steal and one day soon run out of “other people’s money” and collapse. If Obama succeeds in making this country into a socialist state, it, too, will collapse when the world runs out of “other people’s money.” We are the LAST great free market and when we succumb to the socialist swindle, there will be nowhere for them to go to steal the money they need to keep going. (Just common sense)

Coulter Says: "Tax RICH Liberals"

And she’s right. Rich liberals aren’t the “job creators” of this society. They’ve mostly already MADE (or inherited) their money and are not affected by Obama’s “tax the rich” swindle. So what we need to do is start taxing rich liberals! There would soon be a bigger holler about that than there has ever been about anything else. Unfortunately, that’s taxing the same money more than once. Oh; I forgot. They already DO that to everybody. I’ve never made a dime that wasn’t taxed at least six times on several levels. But never on money I HAVE, not money I’ve MADE. The already rich liberals don’t care if those who are still EARNING their money are taxed at a higher rate. They will benefit the most from socialism, which will PREVENT other people from becoming rich. (Ann Coulter)

Communist Party Approves

They have “echoed” Obama’s call for more gun control legislation. They think their gun control policies work best. Of course, it always kept guns out of the hands of “criminals” in communist Russia, didn’t they? We always need the “approval” of the representatives (in this country) of that FAILED system that RAPED Russia for so many years, don’t we? Damn, are people STUPID to take this outfit seriously! You know, the one that has caused so much misery in this world during their existence. The only reason they are considered worse than the Nazis is that we CONQUERED the Nazis. We haven’t been SMART enough to conquer communism. Oh, boy! There I go again, using “forgotten words like Nazi and communist. Many people’s eyes will “glaze over” when they hear it. Sheesh! (The Examiner)

Not In the Liberal Media

A theater shooting copycat of the Aurora, Colorado shooting tried to do a “mass shooting” in a San Antonio, Texas theater but his shooting spree was cut short by an off-duty policeman who was there; thus proving my thesis that ONE GUN in the hands of someone not afraid to use it, could put a stop to such shootings. But did you read about this in the national (liberal) media? Not likely. They rarely report such stories because it destroys their anti-gun rhetoric. Yes, this did appear in the local media, but that’s as far as it went. A story that would be a “media sensation” like the Aurora shooting was roundly ignored in the liberal media, and what’s tragic is that it’s not surprising. (My San Antonio)

"Kill 'Em Where They Stand!

There’s a lot of argument over how to treat the terrorists we catch in the act of killing Americans. Some want us to coddle them. Others want us to give them “constitutional protections.” What stupidity! I don’t think people who only want to KILL innocent people DESERVE any rights, of any kind. I say just shoot them where they stand when we catch them in the act. That's what they'd do to us. And when we DO capture them alive, give them an expedited death sentence. If we just imprison them, other terrorists will kill some people just to get them out of prison. If we just kill ‘em where they stand we avoid many problems, most of which are created by liberals and other terrorists. (Just common sense)

Clinton: "What DIFFERENCE Does It Make?

Hillary exploded at the questions she was being asked at the “hearing” into the “Benghazi incident” by Rep. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and asked “what difference does it make?” to which I would add “that the president and all his accomplices LIED to America long after the truth was known?” It makes a LOT of difference when the president and all his accomplices (including Hillary) LIED to us to keep us from knowing his lies about al-Qaida being “defeated” were a “pipe-dream.” I guess she scared Johnson to the point where he abandoned that line of questioning. (Just common sense)

"Keep Infant Murder Legal!"

The people who demonstrate to keep abortion legal might as well be carrying signs saying, “KEEP CHILD MURDER LEGAL.” They call it “a March for life,” but it is really a “March for Death” because that’s what abortion is. What kind of twisted minds they must have to think abortion is NOT infant murder? Some Germans thought the Nazis’ “Final Solution” that led to the extermination of six million Jews was “the right thing to do” while it was going on, and it was LAW. But it really was MASS MURDER by the government. Our policy to allow parents to MURDER the result of unprotected sex instead of using birth control is our OWN “holocaust” Our country’s abortion policy makes me ashamed to be an American. They SAY it’s for “women’s health” and to support “woman’s right to choose’ what happens to their bodies, but those are LIES. Protecting a woman’s right to choose is SELECTIVE law enforcement, since there are laws against prostitution, which is also “a woman’s right to choose” what she does with her body. And it might be about “women’s health,” but what about the health of those unborn infants.  (About.com)

Child Deaths "In Custody"

The “child protection services” ought to be called the “legal child murderers.” In the years from 2007 to 2012, 72 children died while under CPS “investigation.” I don’t know how many more children died WITHOUT CPS “investigations,” but I’d bet it was a lot less. CPS are SUPPOSED to be “protecting children,” but they seem to be KILLING more children than they save. Further, there are children hurt while under “CPS investigation” than in any other situation. Meanwhile, they ruin the lives of COUNTLESS families with their heavy-handed, unconstitutional “investigations,” in which they use methods the Nazis would have loved. At the same time, a MAJORITY of “investigations,” after all the depredations committed by CPS, are later judged “unfounded.” (Just common sense)

Nobody Wants To Know

The feds lie about it. Sen Menendez’ office says they had no way of knowing, and this intern is now nowhere to be found. Knowledge of his status was DELAYED on orders from SOMEONE in our government, but we can’t find out who gave the order. This sounds like a standard government scandal. Nobody knows ANYTHING; nobody WANTS to know anything. Ask a question about it and get “stonewalled.” This is the type of scandal that would have SUNK a Republican, but will “bounce off´” Obama and Sen. Menendez like a basketball off the rim of a basket. This administration is so corrupt, everybody concerned should be FIRED. But nobody will be. Just like in the “Benghazi incident,” nobody wants to TOUCH it. (Hint: Benghazi is a city in Libya, not a guy named “Ben Ghazi” as some people think) (Talking Points Memo)

Islam Whining About Geller Ads

Islamic terrorists, who KILL people for not believing the exact same way they do, even other Islamics, are “getting their panties in a twist” over some truthful ads Pamela Geller has been running in the New York subways. Have you seen some of THEIR ads being run in Muslim-run countries? Pamela’s ads are on such a higher plane, I’m surprised they can even SEE them. They really think they can DO what they do, run the kind of despicable ads THEY run, and nobody is going to do something to oppose them? What a bunch of ignorant FOOLS these “fifth century thinkers” are. Pam, stop running ads and use that money to support people who will go out and KILL these fools. It’s not “Islamaphobia” to want to kill them before they can kill US. What FOOLS they are to think we will believe their LIE campaign? (Atlas Shrugs)

"I've Cut spending By $1.24 Trillion"

That’s what Obama says he has done, but that’s a HUGE LIE. The biggest LIE going! Typically, he’s LYING about what he has done, and WILL do. I don’t know if he actually thinks we’ll believe his lies, or just doesn’t CARE and simply wants it on the record he CLAIMS to have reduced spending. The fact that there isn’t an iota of evidence to support this claim doesn’t matter to him. If people “call him” on that lie, he will just call them names, ridicule them, talk about how “reprehensible it is” to question him and go right on as if nobody said anything. That’s his “modus operandi.” I think he feels like his "people" are ALL ignorant through not paying attention to what he does until just before an election, and for the most part, he's right. The proof of that is his re-election, despite his MISERABLE record. the sooner we get rid of this FOOL, the better off we'll be. I've seen some presidents in whom I didn't have much faith, but he is the WORST I've ever seen. (Just common sense)

Creating A "Gun Crisis"

The New Chicago Mayor is well known for saying, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” He probably also said (A little less publicly, perhaps), “If a good crisis doesn’t exist, CREATE one.” I believe that’s what the “anti-gun morons” are doing, right now. There aren’t enough “gun crimes” available right at this time to advance their agenda, and they want to take advantage of the various “anti-gun” legislation now making its way through various legislatures, the Congress, and even the United Nations. To take advantage of that, supporting more mass shootings would be a boon to them (especially if they don’t care how many people die to make their point). Right now, the most important gun legislation is that in the United Nations, which only requires the “president’s” signature to be implemented as a treaty if he never presents it to Congress.

If he doesn’t, it can be enforced as if it were law in the “interim (That's the way the "treaty laws" are stupidly written).”How easy is it for anti-gun law” supporters to actually SPONSOR some of these mass shootings to “create an atmosphere” where people will agree to laws and regulations they would usually reject without the panic over “all those shootings.” These people know who the crazies are who might be “edged” in the right direction towards a shooting and they know how to “edge” them. They’ll call me crazy for even SUGGESTING such a thing, but the very fact that it is UNTHINKABLE makes it more liable to be true, in my opinion. After the Sandy Hook killings of CHILDREN, there have been way more illogical shootings, one after the other, all of a sudden. As I write this, they’re talking about the shooting of FIREMEN responding to a fire as they arrived. What’s next? Will there be another assassination of a popular politician? (Just common sense)

Trying For A Third Term

Not satisfied with winning re-election to a second term (I think he stole the election), Obama has pushed his supporters to introduce H J Resolution 15, which, if passed, will eliminate the 22nd Amendment of the constitution, which limits presidents to TWO terms. If it passes, Obama will be able to run for a THIRD TERM. I can’t think of ANYTHING that would be worse trouble for this nation. It could make Obama our FIRST DICTATOR. It’s bad enough we have to suffer him for A SECOND TERM. Don’t allow him to become America’s Hugo Chávez. He’s the WORST president in memory. Do you want him to be “president for life” as he squeezes every penny he can out of those who work and EARN their own living so he can GIVE that stolen to those who DON’T? (Investment Watch)

All They Can Think Of Is "The Guns"

Every time somebody commits a mass shooting, all our INCOMPETENT “leaders” can think of is “BAN GUNS.” They’re all about “getting rid of guns.” They don’t even THINK about the SHOOTERS. Some people “give lip service” to improving mental health. But what they really want to do is BAN GUNS. That’s ALL they’re interested in. People like Wayne LaPierre (perennial VP of NRA) says there should be an armed cop in every school, but even a NON-uniformed one costs a lot of money because that will be all he/she does. Simply ALLOWING one or more STAFF to be armed and TRAINED costs a lot less and would work well. But they ridicule that, saying that staff member would be a “source of danger.” When are these incompetent people going to WAKE UP and get rid of the “no-gun zones” that are an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to come in and shoot up the schools? (Just common sense)

Gun-Hating Paper Now Has Armed Protection

Remember the Journal News, the newspaper in New York state that published the names and addresses of those who held gun permits in their area? They’ve gotten so much backlash they have hired ARMED SECURITY. One wonders if the staff of the Journal have applied for their own licenses to carry guns in response to the supposed “danger” they fear from all those scary “armed people.” Or are they going to just HIRE people to carry the guns FOR them, as do anti-gun politicians. Or if they do, are they going to publish their OWN names and addresses? The Journal is following the “time-honored” method of all gun-haters; they hate them until they need to use them themselves. Then, since most of them are rich, or well-to-do, they HIRE people to carry their guns FOR them or, like one of the best-known gun haters, Senator Diane Feinstein, carry their own guns. These people are such hypocrites they make me want to barf. But they’re apparently not smart enough to recognize that. (ABC News)

Robbers Killed By Armed Citizens

It’s not surprising this happened in Florida, a state which makes it easy for responsible citizens to get “carry permits.” The gun-haters predicted “wild west atmosphere” in Florida as a result.  It didn’t happen. There weren’t even many cases of people shooting criminals in the act of robbing them, unless they were suppressed by a liberal media. This story will not be seen much in the liberal media, except for the LOCAL media. It doesn’t promote the gun hater’s preconceived notions. They’ll say this is a  “aberration,” but it’s not. Less biased reporters tell us people shoot robbers and would-be murderers millions of times per year, but they aren’t, for the most part, reported in the national media. (Miami Herald)

"Mother Jones" Lied

They did an article that concluded that “civilians with guns have never stopped a mass shooting.” WRONG!  The only reason there are very few instances of this is that they are not ALLOWED to be armed, so CAN’T stop mass shootings. But I know of a few instances where armed civilians HAVE stopped mass shootings. One of those was in Colorado Springs, Colorado, where a guy who had already shot up one church, attempted to do it again and ran into a parishioner who had her own gun and shot him. He then killed himself after only killing two other people in that church. They CLAIM she was a “security guard” hired by the church, but that’s a LIE. She was a parishioner who was armed, and they ASKED her to FUNCTION as a security guard while there. That’s a whole lot different. She was armed, and the shooter didn’t know it. That proves my theory. (Weekly Standard)

"More Guns for Good Guys"

As predicted, the National rifle Association (NRA) recommends “more guns in the hands of good guys” to protect our children from the “guns in the hands of bad guys.” He asked if you would have guns in the hands of good guys ten minutes away (as with calling the cops) or a gun in the hands of a good guy standing beside the bad guy? The cops are always at LEAST ten minutes away and this “bad guy” can kill a lot of people in just a few minutes. The shooter in Newtown, CT killed all 26 CHILDREN in 3-1/2 minutes. Had there been a “good guy with a gun” there, that number could have been a lot less as that “good guy” put a couple in his head” as soon as he started shooting. The “anti-gun freaks” have always ridiculed this idea, but it is the ONLY idea that can be successful in dealing with these indiscriminate shooters.

An armed civilian is NOT as crazy as are these shooters just because they aren’t cops. This is the solution I have recommended all along. But nobody (in charge) is smart enough to take me up on it. Wayne LaPerre, perennial vice president of NRA, recommends armed police officers in every school—which is pretty much what they have now. But these officers are usually IN UNIFORM, which makes it easy for potential shooters to “take them out” FIRST, from ambush. I say they should be in civilian clothes, and people not suspected of being armed so a potential shooter cannot “single him out” and eliminate him before “doing his dirty deed.” Schools should NEVER be “gun-free zones.” That is an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to shoot them up. (Huffington Post)

School Shooting In California

In a state where the gun laws are the tightest, a student at Taft high School in Kern County, California managed to get a gun and came into the school shooting, hitting at least two people. If this doesn’t prove my contention that tight gun laws don’t stop such things, I don’t know what will. But the “anti-gun freaks” will ignore it and deny it if me bring it up. The shooting ended when the shooter shot himself. The REPORT is he used an “assault weapon,” but I doubt it, since they don’t even know how to DEFINE what an “assault weapon” even IS. Some people say we need to get rid of all guns, but not only will that never happen, if we were somehow able to get rid of all guns criminals and people determined to go into crowds and shoot people WILL still be able to get guns. I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but there’s something very suspicious about the increase in shootings in SCHOOLS lately. I think somebody is PROMOTING people to DO these shootings to “whip up” support for tighter gun laws—and the anti-gun freaks are cooperating nicely. (International Business Times)

It's A Damned LIE!

Everything that comes out of Obama’s mouth, usually. But this is a lie called so by his own government! The IRS itself says the top 25% pay 86% of all income taxes paid. So how can “the rich” not be paying their fair share?” Obama and all his accomplices keep on repeating this lie and I keep refuting it; and people keep believing it. Like with the Mayan Calendar, they want to believe such things in the face of CERTAIN PROOF otherwise. What hurts is when they do things, based on a lie like that and it affects others, especially me. I’m getting tired of setting the record straight and being ignored. (Rush Limbaugh) Yes, this source is Rush, But he cites the IRS as HIS source and you can see the ORIGINAL source.

Left thinks We Won't Fight for 2nd Amendment

They couldn’t be more wrong! We will fight “to the death” to be able to defend ourselves from  criminals, who don’t care about anti-gun laws because they don’t OBEY laws. The left is fooling itself if they believe we won’t FIGHT to keep the Second Amendment. But then we knew the left were FOOLS, anyway. Most of the things they promote don’t make sense, but they’re too stupid to figure that out for themselves. So we’ll have to pound it into their tiny brains—the ones that HAVE one, anyway. The only thing the left knows how to do is CON themselves into political office. Beyond that, they’re LOST. (Minute Men News)

"Security Director"

Every school needs to have a “security director” who is ARMED and is in full charge of making decisions and policies that are for the SECURITY of the school. Someone who is NOT in uniform and is not KNOWN to be armed so he/she cannot be “picked off” right at the start of a “Columbine-style” massacre. The key here is that NOBODY except maybe the principal and maybe the school board is even aware of the existence of an armed security agent who is properly trained for that position, and of his/her identity. If the Columbine principal had been armed and properly trained he could have “hunted down” both shooters and killed them before their “body count” was able to be so big.

He was actually able to sneak up on at least one and watch while he shot into a room. The same is true at all the other shooting sites. The presence of armed (non-uniformed) security at the Sandy Hook Elementary School could have significantly reduced the number of CHILDREN and teachers the shooter could have killed by seeking him out and killing HIM early on. Banning guns in such places will NEVER stop such things from happening because people who will do such things DON’T OBEY LAWS. Why should they? They have SET OUT to violate MANY laws when they plan to kill innocent people in bunches. Making schools “no-gun zones” is an INVITATION to people who want to go into a school and kill people. (Just common sense)

Bank of America Freezes Gun Mfg. Account

They told them, “You shouldn’t be selling guns and parts on the Internet.” Who the HELL do they think they ARE? They don’t get to decide what’s right and wrong and freeze people’s accounts because of it. This is just as bad as STEALING their money because they don't like them. This gun manufacturer needs to quickly SUE this bank, get their money back, and move the money to another bank that isn’t run by FOOLS. And when they do, they’d better hope they don’t get a liberal judge who rules on his OPINION, not on the Constitution, as he is SUPPOSED to do. One of the shortcomings in our system is allowing a JUDGE, by himself, to REVERSE things that were passed LAWFULLY, just because he doesn’t agree with it. There should be a review process to GUARANTEE the judge does NOT rule according to his OPINION, not the Constitution. The law should “go after” this bank for VIOLATING the law by their action. (Patriot Action Network)

"Gun Free Zones" Cause Deaths

People who wish to go into crowds and shoot people indiscriminately rarely go into gun stores or gun shows, or even police stations to kill people. That shows at lease SOME intelligence on their part. That’s because they KNOW there will be no guns there that they don’t know about so they’re free to kill as many people as they can without somebody shooting THEM. One man made the mistake of trying it IN a gun store and was made into “Swiss cheese” by everybody in the store who was armed. Another went into a church to kill people and found ONE GUN there in the hands of a small woman he didn’t know about, who ENDED his shooting spree after only two deaths. That’s what it’s going to take to put a stop to these shooting sprees: people shooters don’t realize are there who have guns to oppose them. If these people knew there was a great possibility there would be someone there to shoot THEM before they could kill very many people, maybe they’ll think again about doing it. But anti-gun laws will NEVER stop such shootings because people like that will ALWAYS be able to get a gun or guns, one way or another, REGARDLESS of the law. Criminals don’t OBEY laws that say they can’t be armed. (Just common sense)

"Just vote NO"

That’s what Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) has said he’ll do EVERY TIME he is presented with a bill on which he must vote WITHOUT time to read it carefully. The only reason they try that is because they think they can get away with it, as in the case with Obama’s health care swindle bill, which was THOUSANDS of pages and they were not given time to read it. EVERY member of Congress should have voted “no” and maybe the next time they would be given enough time to read it. The “Fiscal Cliff” legislation was presented to Congress with SIX MINUTES allowed to read it. Democrats KNOW most of the bills they present to Congress would never be passed if the members of Congress were given time to read them, so they don’t. This has GOT to stop. Really, a law should be made forcing members of Congress to READ  every bill presented to them for passage and swear, under oath, that they did. (Just common sense)

Another "One-Note Song"

ANOTHER “ONE-NOTE SONG”: Obama has assigned one of the worst “anti-gun fools” in his administration (besides himself, that is), Joe Biden, to be in charge of a commission to “address gun violence” in this country. What that means is Joe must come up with more and better anti-gun laws and ways to BAN GUNS. It doesn’t matter that NO amount of gun banning will keep guns out of the hands of criminals who wish to use them to commit crimes. All they will do is CONTINUE the practice of DISARMING honest people and keeping them from being able to defend themselves. Even Megyn Kelly of Fox News says Biden’s commission will “strike fear” into the NRA. Not even! The NRA knows the best way to approach “gun violence” and no amount of stupidity by Biden is going to “strike fear” into them. (Minute Man News)

AlGore Avoids Taxes on Network Sale

After refusing to sell to Glenn Beck, he sold his failing TV network to Al-Jazeera and profited to the tune of $100 million; from an oil-rich bunch of Muslims, to avoid his “fair share” taxes by selling it BEFORE Obama's tax increases go into effect. This for the “king of green.” As one guy said, “Henceforth, AlGore’s name will be synonymous with hypocrite. Fox reports he made $100 million on the reported sale price of $500 million paid by the oil-rich al-Jazerra, which is owned by the Emir of Qatar. Gore said of the sale: “. . . both networks were founded "to give voice to those who are not typically heard; to speak truth to power; to provide independent and diverse points of view; and to tell the stories that no one else is telling." What a load of BS, with an emphasis on the s! I don’t know much about Gore’s network, because I’ve never watched it, or even investigated it. But I HAVE investigated al-Jazerra, and I know it to be a “branch office” of al Qaida and its propaganda arm. Hopefully, nobody will watch it, as they did not when it was Gore’s network. An aside: Gore is one of the biggest mouthpieces for the "rich-haters" among liberals, and one of the richest among them. Now he's richer. did he STEAL those riches as liberals think others did? (Fox News)

Obama's "One-Note Song"

Obama has ONE NOTE in the song he sings. His jealousy toward people who EARN a lot of money (except guys like AlGore) by being ORIGINAL in their ideas and come up with things lots of people want to buy thus becoming rich tells him to STEAL as much as he can from the PRODUCERS of society and give that STOLEN to the NON-producers (MOOCHERS) in this society. His “one note” is the COMMUNIST song sung by Vladmir Lenin, which resulted in 75 years of misery for Russians when he fooled them into allowing him to impose his COMMUNIST rule upon them. Yes, I know, some FOOLS “tune me out” when I mention such “outdated” words as COMMUNISM and NAZIISM because they THINK those words have no meaning any more. But they do. They represent the fact that collectivists are STILL trying to impose collectivism on us. They have FAILED for many years because we had (HAD) too many intelligent people in this country to fall for that foolishness. All that has changed for the worst.

The results of the last election show that there are more people now who only want a “free ride” than there are of people who realize that doesn’t work and are willing to watch this country “go down the tubes” as long as it doesn’t affect them because they are the RECIPIENTS of the government’s “free rides” at the expense of the PRODUCERS. He constantly intimates that “the rich” somehow STOLE their money from THE POOR. How do you steal from people who HAVE NOTHING? It doesn’t make sense. But this is what Obama is selling. But that has never stopped liberals before. They constantly convince the IGNORANT of things that don’t make sense and win election after election on the basis of LIES. A good example of the IGNORANCE of his constituents is a woman who once told me flat out not to say anything bad about Obama because she liked him. That was in the first year of the misery he has caused. She still feels the same way. This is the woman who has two stickers on her car, side-by-side: one talks about freedom of speech and the other says, “Get rid of Fox News.” She has no idea of the contradiction those stickers represent. But this represents the intelligence level of the people who re-elected him for another four years so he can “finish what he started.” Turning this country into a socialist country. (Just common sense)

"Sharing Your Faith" A Crime?

That’s what Islamists and the United Nations want in the United States. And it will happen if Congress okays the “Defamation of Religion” treaty that Hillary is “on board” with. Are you a Christian? Do you “share” it with others? You could end up in prison for it. This is “creeping Islam” making its slimy way into the United States. If we allow this to continue Islam will have taken over here without firing a shot. All the warfare and strife elsewhere is only a diversion to keep us busy while they quietly “take over: behind a cloud. (Act! For America)

"Musical Political Chairs"

If you look at all the “appointments” in Washington, you’ll find that there is a very small group of people who are perennially elected or “appointed” to powerful offices. These are the members of the “elites” who run Washington, no matter which party is in power. They go from job to job, dipping once in a while into private employment, until it’s safe to appoint them again to a powerful government job. As former federal employees, their pay continues uninterrupted, even while they are out of government office. Then they get paid twice for the same time. Once from the government, and second from their private job. That's one way they get their "payoffs" "legally." That’s how previous elites have set it up so they will keep being paid, even if they do no work for years. (Just common sense)

This Professor Is A FOOL!

“It is as inevitable as the rising of the sun; the Left, when thwarted in their quest for power, suggests the use of lethal force to compel those who disagree.” Who the hell do they think they ARE? To even SUGGEST lethal force to “deal with” people who disagree with their fool notions is criminal, and THEY ought to be imprisoned, at the least, for just the suggestion. Professor of MUSIC, fergawd’ssake, Richard Parncutt, at Graz University in Austria says people who “deny” global warming should be put to death. Like AlGore, he now calls it “climate change” because the scam is a “hard sell” under its original name, “global warming,” with the world actually COOLING lately. The FOOLS who believe in “climate change” are LOSING, and they know it; so they’re flailing about, trying to get rid of (or at least discredit) people who are intelligent enough to know “climate change” or “global warming,” whatever they call it, is a giant scam designed to put a lot of money into AlGore’s (and other people's) pockets. What they’re doing is discrediting themselves! (American Thinker)

Liberals Say "More Guards At Schools"

The Fox News best-known liberal, Alan Colmes, the one who was “bounced from the Hannity and Colmes show and is now only a “radio host”, says the answer to school shootings is “more guards.” What KIND of guards? ARMED guards in uniform, so a potential shooter can locate them first and kill them before killing other innocent people? What they NEED is more teachers, principals, janitors, and the like with “carry permits” who can “put a couple in” a potential shooter before they can kill more unarmed innocent people. Like happened at that church in Colorado Springs, Colorado when a crazed killer came in without knowing she was there. They CALL her a “security guard,” but she wasn’t. She was a parishioner who happened to be legally armed, and who they ASKED to “act” as a security guard. But the thing that allowed her to kill this shooter is that he didn’t know there was anybody there who was armed. And that was the “secret.” (Just common sense)

Don't Fall For It

One of the oldest scams the Democrats use to con Republicans into tax increases is to promise SPENDING CUTS “some time in the future.” But he future spending cuts never come. This scam was used on Ronald Reagan and George Bush (the senior) that I know of, and it cost Bush re-election. It also gave the Democrats the right to say Reagan raised taxes, too. I don’t know how many times it was used on Bush the younger, but they spent a lot of money and raised taxes a LOT during his administration. It’s like the old “Peanuts” strip where Lucy cons Charlie Brown into kicking the ball, then pulls it away as he kicked it, causing him to fall down. They pull it time after time and politicians on both sides fall for it, almost by rote. They’re trying it right now on the Republicans—and the Republicans are showing signs of falling for it again. (Just common sense)

I'm Gonna Say It Again

 And again and again until it sinks into the feeble minds of all those FOOLS who blame the GUN when some ignorant FOOL takes a gun and kills a bunch of innocent people they find in bunches. We need more people in those groups with “carry permits.” People these “shooters” don’t know are there, who can shoot them before they can kill more than one or two people. Getting rid of guns isn’t going to solve the problem. Guns EXIST. You can’t “uninvent” them. “Bad guys” will ALWAYS be able to get their guns while people who OBEY laws won’t. If Frank DeAngelis, principal at Columbine High School, had had a gun when he “looked around a corner and watched one of the shooters killing people” he could have “put a couple in the head of the shooter” and ended at least that one shooter’s “kill score,” then go after, and kill the other. As it was, all he could do was “hide and watch” as the shooter murdered students and teachers. One of these days we MIGHT find a COMPETENT politician who will realize this and put a stop to “no gun zones,” which are “open invitations” to shooters who want to spray bullets into crowds of people. (Just common sense)

Fool Logic

The very LOGIC used by liberals is foolish. They insist “The rich” (PRODUCERS) stole their riches “from the poor.” How STUPID is that? The poor have nothing to STEAL! But they don’t expect you to notice that. They think we’re as stupid as they are. Their logic is just as silly in everything they want us to believe. And many of us actually ARE that stupid. This is because they pay no attention to politics, preferring to spend their time on football, basketball, baseball, hockey, and their many other pursuits instead of keeping track of what their crooked politicians are doing to them. Meanwhile their politicians are conning them out of their socks and removing right after right as quickly as they can, and they don't even notice. (Just common sense)

"Gun-Free Zones"

Except for those carried by criminals and crazies wanting to shoot everybody in sight, that is. People who obey laws obey gun laws. Criminals don’t. The other day, such a fool murdered 20 CHILDREN, some as young as 5. the day before another killed at least two people in another shopping center shooting. The news media went “wall-to-wall with it. In Denver, at least one radio station spent the entire DAY into the night talking about it. I’m sure this happened all over the country, maybe even the world. And they should, because somebody killing a bunch of CHILDREN is a real tragedy. What did these two shootings gave in common? They were both “gun-free zones.” But what about that shooting last year in a GUN SHOP where the guy shot a clerk and was instantly made into “Swiss cheese” by the rest of the clerks, including the one he shot? It was a news item for a few hours and then “sank like a stone.” Except for the Indianapolis media, nobody was interested in the story. Why? Because the victim was armed and able to defend himself. Even the “anti-gun crazies” shut up about it because this kind of story, where the victim was armed, just didn’t fit their narrative. I’ve always noticed that such shootings didn’t happen at gun shows or anywhere else where everybody was armed, and for a good reason. In “gun-free zones” like schools and the like, they might as well put up a sign saying, “No guns here. We’re defenseless. Come on in and shoot us.”

Yes, such shootings are bad. But trying to eliminate guns to stop them is illogical and STUPID. The GUN didn’t kill these people. The man HOLDING the gun did. If he couldn’t get a gun (doubtful) he’d find something else to use in killing innocent people. Anybody who BELIEVES that a CRIMINAL, who violates the law for a LIVING, will OBEY a law saying he can’t be armed is STUPID. And that includes all those stupid politicians who think so, including our illustrious president . I’m getting very tired of repeating this and having it fall on deaf ears while more and more people DIE because of this rampant STUPIDITY. I’m still waiting for our incompetent politicians to WAKE UP and realize that the ONLY WAY to eliminate such atrocities is to allow as many GOOD people as possible to be armed, including in those ubiquitous “gun-free zones” for self defense so the crazies and criminals won’t be FREE to kill innocent people. It is a PROVEN FACT that where there are MORE GUNS in the hands of innocent people, violent crime goes DOWN. In Florida, where getting a carry permit is easy, the violent crime rate has PREDICTABLY gone DOWN wile the deaths and injuries to armed CRIMINALS has gone UP. In Israel, where EVERYBODY is armed (even school teachers) there ARE no mass shootings. There cannot be more OBVIOUS evidence this is true. But our anti-gun politicians are blissfully IGNORANT of this fact. They’re PURPOSELY ignorant of facts that do not advance their narrative. (Mail.com)

"Let's Deal With Spending Later"

That’s such a common old con I’m surprised politicians still fall for it. Even Reagan fell for it; Both Bushes fell for it. Their FRIEND Clinton fell for it (maybe on purpose). Or should I say their CONGRESSES fell for it. It’s like Lucy and Charlie Brown and the football. Every year she cons him into kicking the football while she pulls it away at the last second, causing him to fall down. It’s a good running gag, but not so good when the government uses it to fool the other side into doing what THEY want them to do. So we allow some raises in taxes, hoping the Damnocrats will agree to lowering spending later. But “later” never comes. They laugh at us for even suggesting it. They think it’s FUNNY that we keep falling for that old scam over and over again. Now they’re trying it again, but this time it’s the PRESIDENT who is making the offer, hoping the Republicans will “fall for it” and they can raise taxes while blaming the Republicans. (Just common sense)

We're Being Ruled By Morons

That’s what Rush Limbaugh says, and he’s right. The morons who are “ruling” us now mostly think collectivism (socialism) is the way we should go, and they’re wrong (but you'll never convince them of that). Socialism, in its many forms, (communism, socialism, Fascism, Naziism, Progressivism) has failed each time it has been tried, eventually. Those that still exist are dependent on the others loaning them money from what they have left. They DEPEND on the earnings of the free market to give them money to steal and soon run out of “other people’s money” and collapse. If Obama succeeds in making this country into a socialist state, it, too, will fail when the world runs out of “other people’s money.” We are the LAST great free market and when we succumb to the socialist swindle, there will be nowhere for them to go to steal the money they need to keep going. (Just common sense)

Some People Should Die

Others don’t even deserve to have ever LIVED. One such is the man who murdered his own SISTER (after murdering his own grandmother and spending time in prison for it), then set his own house on fire to lure UNPAID firemen (who only do good, and don’t even get paid for it) to his home so he could kill them. The only reason he only killed TWO of ythese “good Samaritans” is that an off-duty policeman showed up and stopped him, making him commit suicide. The liberal media didn’t report that, because it doesn’t fit into their anti-gun narrative. Others are Islamic terrorists, who only LIVE to KILL people who don’t believe exactly as they do; another is the shooter who murdered 20 innocent CHILDREN who has never done him any harm, and all the other shooters who lately have PROVEN to me that we need to not only have the RIGHT to keep a gun and carry it without restriction for our own protection, it needs to happen, NOW. The “anti-gun fanatics” decry that, saying, “Who should we allow everybody to be armed? That would just create a “wild West atmosphere” where more people will be killed.” Not so! And a stupid statement, at best, because it’s a proven fact that where “gun laws” are the tightest, the easier guns are to get illegally.

Anybody who WANTS a gun, for good or evil, can get one easily, NOW. And it’s much better for responsible people to be armed, so as to defend themselves and make illegally armed criminals DEAD. Robert Heinlein said, “An armed society is a polite society” and the “wile west” proved it. Bad guys who misused their guns were soon DEAD, making gun misuse a disappearing problem. Yes, there would eventually be some gun killings—in self-defense more than for any other reason. And that’s a GOOD thing, for it quickly thins the ranks of ILLEGALLY-armed criminals. Some people are only still alive because it is ILLEGAL to kill them. Some of those people are the liberal media who consistently MIS-report, or do not at all report stories that would tend to prove their anti-gun rhetoric false. But even if I DID have a gun “legally,” I wouldn’t kill such people because it is ILLEGAL to kill them and I am a responsible human being. The kind of person they don’t understand. They think if people were allowed to carry their own guns, that people would be shooting each other with wild abandon, all over the place. And they’re WRONG. Responsible people don’t do that and they don't understand that.

These people are FOOLS and shouldn’t be allowed to be in a position to REPORT the news. But we have a First Amendment, which is just as important as the Second, which they’re trying their best to eliminate. Frankly, if they EVER get rid of the Second Amendment, they should do likewise with the First, at the same time, because the First made it POSSIBLE to get rid of the Second. When you talk about getting rid of the First, they whine about it, all the while trying to get rid of the Second. The fact is, the Second Amendment is there ONLY so we can defend ourselves from IRRESPONSIBLE people who do not OBEY any laws, let alone ones that say they can’t be armed while they commit their crimes. It’s not there for hunters, though it DOES protect them, as well. The “toothpaste is out of the tube.” Guns EXIST. They cannot be “uninvented.” So we have to DEAL with them logically. Making laws against them is NOT logical. It not only does not work, it causes more people to be KILLED by those unscrupulous criminals who will ALWAYS be able to get them ILLEGALLY. (Just common sense)

Coulter: "Tax Rich LIBERALS"

And she’s right. Rich liberals aren’t the “job creators” of this society. They’ve mostly already MADE (or inherited) their money and are not affected by Obama’s “tax the rich” swindle. So what we need to do is start taxing rich liberals! There would soon be a bigger holler about that than there has ever been about anything else. Unfortunately, that’s taxing the same money more than once. Oh; I forgot. They already DO that to everybody. I’ve never made a dime that wasn’t taxed at least six times on several levels. But never on money I HAVE, not money I’ve MADE. The already rich liberals don’t care if those who are still EARNING their money are taxed at a higher rate. They will benefit the most from socialism, which will PREVENT people from becoming rich. (Ann Coulter)

Beating It to Death

I know the mass shooting in Connecticut is a major tragedy, having ended so many lives, particularly of those small children who can’t have done ANYTHING to have hurt the shooter. But, as with the Columbine shooting and all the others, the news media “beats it to death” until we are TIRED of hearing about every belch uttered by ANYBODY that has ANY connection to the shootings. Three days after the Connecticut shooting (as this is written), I STILL can’t avoid more and more stories about really tiny things connected with it on every station I turn to. It’s disgusting. It’s as if there isn’t any other news in the world. Some of those shooters do it for the notoriety involved, and the fact that the media "beats it to death" makes them very happy. It's now Christmas day and there have been several more mass shootings since, including the one in New York, where a guy set a house on fire to draw firemen, then opened fire on them, killing two, before he killed himself and most likely his own sister, as well. I don't know who he is, and I don't care. On that somber note, I want to wish everybody a MERRY CHRISTMAS! None of that "Happy Holidays" crap here. Any celebration of the birthday of Jesus Christ ought to carry His name, whether you believe or not. This will be the only post today, as I celebrate Christmas with my family. (Just common sense)

What FOOLS They Be!

Atheists have always felt “left out” during Christmas celebrations because they had nothing to celebrate. Christians celebrated the birth of Christ, Jews celebrate Hanukkah, blacks celebrate Kwanzaa, whatever THAT is, and many other religions celebrate what their own beliefs dictate. So atheists have come up with their own reason to celebrate during Christmas season and called it “Human Light,” whatever THAT is. They say it is an “alternative to supernatural religious beliefs.” Why do we need an “alternative to supernatural religious beliefs?” If they don’t want to believe in ANY religion, organized, or not, then don’t. But don’t spend a lot of time and money to STOP others from acting on THEIR beliefs. Atheism has become a religion in itself and jealously guards its beliefs. That’s okay. Just LEAVE US ALONE! (The Blaze)

Media Ignores Obama's Union Violence

Union violence is rampant in Michigan because the governor signed a law preventing the unions from FORCING workers to join a union or give it money anyway in order to get or keep their jobs. They say it’s just “workers voicing their anger,” but it’s not. It’s UNIONS “voicing their anger” (with the support of the "president") at not being able to victimize workers who would rather not belong to a union. But the media is “tuned into” Obama’s wishes, which are PRO-union. So they don’t say anything about the violence the unions commit, while trying to MINIMIZE that which occurs. It’s DISGUSTING to me the way the media today “cherry pick” the news they will cover so as to advance the agenda of this (or any other) administration. Like the story about the aide to Sen. Melendez who is an illegal alien and a sex offender they kept from us until AFTER the election because that news might have hurt Obama. It might interest you to know that I had to read well into the SECOND paragraph in this story to learn Menendez is a Democrat. (U. S, News/NBC News)

Criticized For Common Sense

Perennial NRA VP Wayne LaPierre spoke common sense and has been vilified for it by the ignorant people who think the way to self defense is to DISARM themselves and hope the illegally armed criminals will leave them alone, a forlorn hope. In his press conference the other day he said what amounts to one thing: “The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to oppose him with a good guy with a gun.” There is NO other way. When such a shooter starts shooting, what do they do? Call for somebody with a gun to oppose him. Unfortunately that doesn’t work, because the nearest good guy with a gun is usually at LEAST ten minutes away while an armed and trained EMPLOYEE of that school or shopping center is RIGHT THERE; a lot closer than the nearest cop. Such shooters can kill a lot of people in the first couple of minutes while the cop drives to the scene. That supposed NRA member who cut up his NRA membership card on television is STUPID. He has no other answer to this problem, but he condemns the answer the NRA gave him out of IGNORANCE.

Nobody else has a viable answer, but THEY criticize LaPierre for providing the ONLY viable answer there is: at least ONE PERSON at every school, unknown to the shooter, with a gun, trained and ready to oppose would-be mass shooters. Such people can’t offer their own solution, and criticize LaPierre’s solution out of IGNORANCE. Yes, a UNIFORMED cop at every school would stand out, and become the FIRST TARGET of a would-be shooter. But a teacher or other staff member people are used to seeing around, but who don’t know are armed, CAN stop a would-be shooter by killing him before he can shoot a lot of people. John Lott, author of “More Guns, Less Crime,” has PROVEN that more guns in the hands of responsible people who are trained in its use, can, and DOES reduce crime, wherever it has been tried. On the other hand, it has been PROVEN beyond doubt that “gun-free zones” are an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to come in and murder masses of people. The only answer our government offers is MORE GUN CONTROL and that doesn’t work. The literal definition of INSANITY is to do the same thing over and over, expecting a different result. That’s all they can offer, yet the world seems to accept it. (The Philly Post)

Paul Harvey Was Right 47 Years Ago

“If I were the Devil, I’d keep on doing what he’s doing.” This video is only about 3 minutes long, but it tells you exactly how it is, TODAY. And he lists everything that’s being done TODAY by the liberals. Talk about being prescient! I could understand somebody saying these things today, but it takes somebody who really knows how to judge the world to say this 47 years ago. I have always been a Paul Harvey fan, and I’m very sorry he is dead. The world has lost a real “seer.” (Paul Harvey)

Anti-Gun Lies

Some time ago, the liberal magazine “Mother Jones” did a “study” that showed that in not one case had a multi-victim killing been stopped by an armed citizen. Only one problem: that’s a lie, told by simply ELIMINATING all shootings that were stopped by a gun in the hands of a citizen. Not reported in ANY news source is the fact that in Portland, there was a man there who had not noticed the signs saying that mall was a “gun-free zone” and carried his licensed gun into the mall. Everyone wonders why this shooter committed suicide after killing only a few people while firing a lot of shots. What nobody reported is that while reloading, he saw this man taking aim at him and committed suicide. In Colorado Springs, Colorado, a shooter coming into a church to do a mass killing was shot by a lone armed woman the church CLAIMS was a “security guard,” but who was in actuality simply a parishioner who happened to be armed and was asked by the church to “act as a security guard” while there. Other cases are: The Mayan Palace Theater in San Antonio, TX where an off-duty cop shot the shooter, preventing any civilian deaths; A Winnemucca, NV restaurant shooting where a licensed gun owner killed the would-be mass killer before more than two were killed;

The Appalachian School of Law, where two armed students stopped a would-be mass killer and captured him before he could kill more than a few people; In Santee, CA, a “trained campus supervisor (an off-duty cop bringing his daughter to school) “threw down” on the shooter, holding him for the cops after he was only able to kill two fellow students; At Pearl High School in Mississippi, the principal armed himself from his car when a student started killing his fellow students and held him for the cops after only two deaths; In Edinboro, PA, a student starts shooting up a restaurant gathering of students, and is stopped by a shotgun-wielding restaurant owner. By contrast, shootings at other places where NO GUNS are allowed report many deaths. In another case, a man tried to shoot up a GUN STORE and was made into “Swiss cheese” by the store employees and their customers. This sounds like “Mother Jones” is LYING to support the “anti-gun” agenda. Other anti-gun freaks likewise LIE when they release the “results” of THEIR phony “studies.” The lesson to be learned here is that these people don’t hesitate to LIE to  support their agenda, so never believe ANYTHING they tell you. (Ann Coulter)

"Mall Shooting!" "Ban Guns!"

That’ll be the cry; mark my words. The anti-gun fanatics ALWAYS “blame the guns” whenever some crazy goes out and shoots some innocent people. But the gun didn’t go crazy, a PERSON did, then picked up the gun. The gun didn’t do anything but what it was DESIGNED to do. We’ll either find out the gun was legally bought by a guy who “had no priors,” or ILLEGALLY by either somebody too young to own a gun, who is already a criminal or a known crazy. They won’t admit that gun laws can DO NOTHING to stop people who are DETERMINED to kill people from doing it. If they can’t get one legally, they’ll go out and buy one ILLEGALLY in a back alley somewhere, out of another criminal’s car trunk I really get tired of making this argument and being ignored, while honest people (including me) are kept from owning and carrying the means to their own self defense while criminals go about carrying their illegal guns hunting us. I’m still waiting for a politician, ANY politician, to answer the question, “What makes you think a CRIMINAL, who breaks laws for a LIVING, will OBEY a law that says he can’t be armed?” (Huffington Post)

TSA: "We're doing Our Best"

TSA: “WE’RE DOING OUR BEST”:  If this is “their best,” it leaves a LOT to be desired. The TSA in Texas detained a little, 12-year-old crippled girl with degenerative bone disease for more than an HOUR because they “detected fertilizer,” which could have been “explosive residue” on her. Nobody even THOUGHT to check the WHEELS on her wheelchair, which might have rolled through some fertilizer somewhere. Apparently, they’re too STUPID to do that. Did they think this little crippled girl was REALLY a threat? The local TSA “top dawg” gave them his cell phone number when he was called in and promised to come in and personally walk her through the system in the future every time she came through. Nice gesture, but way too late to make this innocent little girl feel better. (Mail Online)

Fool Calls Fox Anchor "Fathead"

Author Tom Ricks (who’s that?) Called Fox anchor Jon Scott a “fathead recently after  Scott suddenly ended his interview with Ricks after Ricks said Fox was “overhyping” the Benghazi incident and acting as a “wing of the Republican Party.” Fox said he later apologized and I believe them. I watch them regularly and have NEVER caught them in a lie. I watch them because I got tired of watching the media fawn over Obama and his “band of thieves” and “select” the news they WILL cover so as to please Obama. His claim that Fox “overhypes” the Benghazi incident is the words of a FOOL. That incident CANNOT be emphasized enough. Not until the people responsible for the deaths of FOUR embassy people have been made to accept responsibility and take the consequences. That’s how liberals try and discredit the ONLY news outlet that tells the WHOLE story, not leaving out things the liberals don’t like. And that’s what ALL liberals hate (not just Ricks) about them. Actually, it is NOT Fox that “makes things up,” it’s the entire liberal media. I can PROVE that, Ricks cannot prove his contention. This fool should SHUT UP. He should stop telling LIES about one of the ONLY network that brings us ALL the news; not just the news that doesn’t make Obama mad. (The Blaze) It’s the second item, Scroll down.

What Was Different in the Forties?

In the forties [when I went to school –RT] there just WERE no school shootings like the Sandy Hook school shooting that claimed the lives of 20 small children and six adults. There were NO such shootings then, and it was not unusual for children to actually bring guns to school with them. Those kids often used those guns to provide food for the table.  Then they made a law against it and opened the floodgates. Writer Dave Kopel wrote about that very thing. “Kopel says that for most of America’s history ‘it was not uncommon for students to bring guns to school.’ He cites a column in which John Lane reminisces about his youth in the 1940s and 1950s, and says that he ‘attempted to find a school shooting from that era,’ but ‘came up empty.’ On the following page Kopel goes further, passing on the claim that ‘before the 1990 [Gun-Free School Zone Act], there had been only seven shootings at an American school in the previous 214 years,’ and that ‘in the 17 years following the GFSZA, there were 78 such incidents.’ ’’ Something’s wrong here. without such laws, there were NO such shootings, and after that law was passed there were 78, compared with only SEVEN in the previous 214 years! The difference is such shooters now KNOW there will be NO GUNS in schools so they are PRIME TARGETS. That’s the difference. (Student Activism)

"It Didn't Work, Let's Do It Again!"

Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is a DEFINITION of insanity. So General Motors, now run by Obama’s government, is coming out with a new electric car, even though nobody wanted the Chevy Volt and they’ve shut down the plant that made them (until Obama orders it open again in spite of lack of customers). This new one isn’t a “hybrid” with a backup gasoline engine. When it runs out of power, the driver is just out of luck and had better be close to a plug. Oh, yeah, Obama “saved” the auto industry all right! He keeps pumping money into it so it LOOKS like it’s doing better. Watch out, folks! We’ll soon be the “Union of Soviet Socialist America.” That’s what Obama is going after. (Chevy Spark)

"Gun-Free Zones"

Except for those carried by criminals and crazies wanting to shoot everybody in sight, that is. People who obey laws obey gun laws. Criminals don’t. Yesterday, such a fool murdered 20 CHILDREN, some as young as 5. the day before that, another killed at least two people in another shopping center. The news media went “wall-to-wall with it, too. In Denver, at least one radio station spent the entire DAY into the night talking about the Connecticut shooting. I’m sure this happened all over the country, maybe even the world. And they should, because somebody killing a bunch of CHILDREN is a real tragedy. But they don't need to "beat it into the ground." What did these two shootings gave in common? They were both “gun-free zones.” But what about that shooting last year in a GUN SHOP where the guy shot a clerk and was instantly made into “Swiss cheese” by the rest of the clerks, including the one he shot? Was the shooter planning on shooting everybody in the store? It was a news item for a few hours and then “sank like a stone.” Except for the Indianapolis media, nobody was interested in the story. Why? Because the victim was armed and able to defend himself. Even the “anti-gun crazies” shut up about it because this kind of story, where the victim was armed, just didn’t fit their narrative. I’ve always noticed that such shootings didn’t happen at gun shows or anywhere else where everybody was armed, and for a good reason. In “gun-free zones” like schools and the like, they might as well put up a sign saying, “No guns here. We’re defenseless. Come on in and shoot us.”

Yes, such shootings are bad. But trying to eliminate guns in order to stop them is illogical and STUPID. The GUN didn’t kill these people. The man HOLDING the gun did. If he couldn’t get a gun (doubtful) he’d find something else to use in killing innocent people. Anybody who BELIEVES that a CRIMINAL, who violates the law for a LIVING, will OBEY a law saying he can’t be armed is STUPID. And that includes all those stupid politicians who think so, including our illustrious President Obama. I’m getting very tired of repeating this and having it fall on deaf ears while more and more people DIE because of this rampant STUPIDITY. I’m still waiting for our incompetent politicians to WAKE UP and realize that the ONLY WAY to eliminate such atrocities is to allow as many GOOD people as possible to be armed, and carry their guns concealed.  including in those ubiquitous “gun-free zones” for self defense so the crazies and criminals won’t be FREE to kill innocent people. It is a PROVEN FACT that where there are MORE GUNS in the hands of innocent people, violent crime goes DOWN. In Florida, where getting a carry permit is easy, the violent crime rate has PREDICTABLY gone DOWN wile the deaths and injuries to armed CRIMINALS has gone UP. There cannot be more OBVIOUS evidence this is true. But our anti-gun politicians are blissfully IGNORANT of this fact. They’re PURPOSELY ignorant of facts that do not advance their narrative. (Mail.com)

What Stupidity!

 This artist depicts Obama as the “Crucified Christ.” How STUPID is he? Can’t this person see that Obama is DESTROYING our economy by his prolific spending? It pains me to know we HAVE such stupid people in this country who have the TALENT to produce such a painting. This kind of thing shows just how far the fools running this country into the socialist ground have come in conditioning people that their fool policies are rational and proper. Damn! (Todd Starnes)

A "Turning Point" In Gun Control

Damn, I hope not! That would be STUPID. That’s what they are now saying of the mass shooting in Portland, Oregon. Like a LAW will stop people like this shooter from STEALING the gun he used to murder at least two people at that mall. As I predicted, they want to ban all “assault weapons,” using this as an opportunity to advance their agenda, and without knowing just what an “assault weapon” is. They seem to forget that people who want to do such things WILL get a gun if they have to buy it illegally or STEAL it. The “toothpaste is out of the tube.” Guns exist, and you’re not going to be able to UN-invent them. If they exist, people WILL be able to get one. And if they can’t, they’ll use something else such as a sword, as did yet another would-be mass murderer recently. (Just common sense)

I'm Not A Conservative

Though conservatism in America is close to what I am. Neither am I a liberal, and never could be. Liberals, for the most part, believe stealing from a person who PRODUCES something and giving that stolen to someone who DIDN’T earn it, for whatever reason, is right. They believe EVERYBODY should get an “equal piece of the pie,” whether they earned it, or not. Conservatives believe the exact opposite. So do I. But some conservatives are ardent Christians; I’m not. I believe in a supreme being that “orders this universe.” I’d be a fool not to. This universe, in all its wonder and complicated interconnections, did not come into existence by chance. But I may or may not believe He takes the form you believe in. A supreme being capable of creating this universe doesn’t have time to worry about whether or not people believe in or worship Him. We are a "by-product" of His creation. Does that make me bad? Some people who do NOT believe in God want to vilify me for my beliefs, or lack thereof.

Some who do not believe in God want to vilify me for believing in a supreme being who may or may not be THEIR God. How can I hurt anybody for not believing the exact same way they do? Muslim extremists want to KILL me for the crime of being an “unbeliever.” That is the sign of a FOOL. I am a “rational individualist.” I give no credence to the wishes of ANYBODY who wants to control my life or my actions. I make MY OWN decisions and jealously GUARD the ability to do so, unhindered, either by liberals OR conservatives – or anybody else.  Conservatism is but a label one person applies to another to use in judging him (or her). Liberalism likewise. Liberals don’t want to be judged. But every person MUST judge others in order to know how to deal with that person. We are judging each other daily. It’s part of life. Refusing to allow judging is a means of not being held responsible for their actions without reprisals when they are judged to be inimical to good order. It is my right to judge others, though it is not necessarily my right to take that person to task for my judgment of him (her). (Just common sense)
TR UC

Department of Business

Obama wants to appoint another new cabinet member; the Secretary of Business. What the hell FOR? All such a "secretary" can do is make regulations that PREVENT good business. That shows me Obama knows NOTHING about business. As if I didn’t know that already. He has never held a job outside of government from the time he was a “community organizer” to the day he BECAME president, his salary has ALWAYS come from a government job, either appointed or elected. And he’s never DONE anything really important—nothing anybody but the moochers ever wanted. That’s his voting bloc: MOOCHERS; those who don’t want to be bothered EARNING a living and would rather the government paid for their living, instead. The people who don’t care if he destroys the economy of the country as long as he keeps the “goodies” coming. “That's right, he knows he has a problem with American business and naturally, he thinks there is a government solution. This shows how tone-deaf he is, how ignorant he must be of how business works in America and what American businesses want from Washington.” They want nothing except to be LEFT ALONE to do their business. (Washington Post)

Geithner: Remove Debt Ceiling

Let us spend ALL your money! That’s how he thinks we can solve our debt problems: borrow more and more without limit. I wish I could do that without ever reaching the END of my credit. This is the level of intelligence displayed by Obama appointees. This guy in particular, was appointed to run the IRS, even though he owed thousands of dollars in back taxes, himself. No wonder he thinks the path to economical solvency is to borrow more and more. Damn, what INCOMPETENCE this reveals! He said the recent effort to stop the increase in the debt ceiling was a “political ploy” for “political advantage.” Wow! This guy is REALLY stupid! (The Blaze)