You Don't WANT Socialism!

“Denmark has the highest total tax obligation in the world, towering far above the European average. It also has the smallest private sector in Europe, to support one of the biggest public sectors. Add to that a generous entitlement system allowing unemployed and unemployable citizens an income well above that achieved by full-time employees in the private sector in many European countries, and tax revenues nearly unmatched anywhere else in the world are required. While the majority of Danish politicians may intuitively understand this malady – many of them still view capitalists as an unpleasant necessity to generate the necessary revenues to fund a social welfare state and its myriad of responsibilities. They continue to spend more money, hire more public servants, regulate, supervise and monitor even the most insignificant activities. Sound at all familiar?” Yes, it does. It sounds like the very thing Obama is working hard to impose on the United States.

Socialism is COLLECTIVISM; a system that has NEVER WORKED, wherever it has been tried. Liberals try and convince you it succeeded in Cuba, even though Cuba has been SUFFERING under it for years and is soon itself to collapse. The only thing holding it together was the money sent it by Soviet Russia, now itself broke. The Soviet Union WAS the big socialist “showcase” for years, until it predictably ran out of “other people’s money,” as ALL socialist regimes will do, eventually. But only after their citizens SUFFER and die for years. They NEED the “private sector” to earn the money they STEAL to finance their “flights of fancy” even while they condemn that “private sector” and the free market. I don’t want ANY kind of collectivism, and neither do you if you examine it carefully. Collectivism (socialism, communism, Fascism, and progressivism), and under any other name it uses, is institutional THEFT. It institutionalizes STEALING from those who EARN and giving that stolen to those who DON’T. It will inevitably collapse when the people from whom they steal realize what’s happening and stop earning money for them to steal. (Heritage Foundation)

Obama Shuts Down Critical Web Site

He shouldn’t have the power to do it, but he has, if people will not do anything to stop him. He told web site host “GoDaddy” to shut down the site owned by Douglas Hagmann, who was told by ISP GoDaddy his site contained information that was “maliciously harmful to individuals in the government.” And “GoDaddy” did it. (Which means I will never have a site hosted by them).“GoDaddy wouldn’t tell us who told them to do it, but we found out it was Obama’s “tattler site,” the “truth team,” which has NO authority to order ANY site shut down. I think Hagmann has a “cause of action” that should cost “GoDaddy” a lot of money. This is the kind of thing I would expect of a dictator as well as a “wanna-be dictator.” We’ll be well rid of Obama after November. I’ve heard of presidents “going after” critics, but never before so blatantly as well as illegally in the United States. (InfoWars)

Muslims RUIN Army Officer

For telling the truth about Muslim terrorists. Lt. Col Matthew Dooley, a 1994 graduate of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and a highly decorated combat veteran was happily teaching the truth about Muslim extremists at the Joint Forces Staff College of the National Defense University when the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs excoriated him, removed him from his position, and filed a report that guaranteed the ruination of his career after Muslims demanded he be SILENCED and REMOVED. When, in the past, have we EVER pandered to the ENEMY (like the Nazis) who is wantonly killing our people by silencing someone who is TELLING THE TRUTH about our enemy by acceding to their demands? General Martin Dempsey is the one who should be removed from his office and his career ruined. This fool has no business being Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Will he? Probably not as long as we have a Muslim sympathizer in the White House who, himself, panders to the enemy. Frankly, for my part, I don’t give a damn if Muslims are offended by the truth. (Thomas More Law Center)

Socialism NEEDS the Free Market

Socialists say they HATE the free market, or “capitalism,” as they call it derisively. But what they don’t say is socialism NEEDS the free market in order to have earned money to steal so as to survive. Without the money EARNED by people in the free market, socialists have no money or property to STEAL and “redistribute.” That’s a question they never answer: “Where does the money come from under socialism?” That’s because they can’t. They just start calling you names. Socialism is a system that emphasizes mediocrity. They want “a fair share for everyone,” even those who can’t (or won’t) earn for themselves. Yes, it’s right to help those who CAN’T help themselves because of old age or illness, or infirmity, but to “help” able-bodied people who just will not work is silly and wrong. They don’t deserve a “fair shake.” The trouble with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of "other people's money." (Just common sense)

It's Not About "Big Bird"

Obama is making a big thing of Romney’s comments about cutting funding to public broadcasting, ridiculing it by such comments as “finally, SOMEBODY actually took on “Big Bird,” and others, such as saying one of the “Sesame Street” figures was seen in a “white Bronco, headed for the border.” He’s doing this because he CAN’T say anything about his record in office, which is DISMAL. He’s trying to divert attention from that by ridiculing Romney for “cutting funding to “Big Bird.” Even “ Big Bird doesn’t like it, and they have sent a notice to Obama’s election committee to STOP using “Big Bird’s name and picture in their political advertising. It’s not as if cutting public broadcasting off will make “Big Bird” go away. It won’t. “Sesame Street” is one of the biggest, most lucrative enterprises on the planet. It won’t even NOTICE the funds cut. Maybe Obama ought to concentrate on packing for his trip back home in January. (Bare Naked Islam)

Ask A Stupid Question

World Net Daily does exactly that when it asks if Obama is a socialist or a Fascist. That’s like asking if he’s a socialist or a socialist. Socialism and Fascism are simply two different kinds of COLLECTIVISM, which says it’s okay to steal from people who EARN something and give that stolen to somebody who DOES NOT earn anything. That’s theft, whether it’s done by an individual or a government. Why can’t people understand this? Collectivism is dishonesty made “legal” by the government. Pure and simple. It creates NO new wealth, but only takes advantage of that created by individuals who DO earn. In fact, without those individuals who DO earn, socialism (or any other form of collectivism) cannot survive because there would be nothing to steal and “redistribute. (Just common sense)

We're Baacckk!

We started out being off the Internet Thursday while waiting for Comcast to take three days to get to our installation. We've been off the Internet since Friday because of the incompetence of a Comcast employee who didn't know the difference between our new address and our old one when they sent someone out to correct the flawed installation of our Internet on the first try, Friday. But we're on now, and I hope we'll stay on.

Two Kinds of Rich

Obama and other liberals hate “the rich.” Even though HE (and most other liberals) is rich, having written two books that have made him very successful. He forgets that. One kind of rich people get rich by coming up with a product or service that many people want to buy, work hard to make it and spend a lot of their own money to accomplish it. These are the people Obama and other liberals hate even though they are the ones who create ALL the jobs and whose profits IMPROVE the economy. (The government CANNOT improve the economy, OR create jobs. All it an do is stand in the way.) The other kind is the person who either inherited it or married it, as with John Kerry, the 2008 Democrat presidential candidate, (whose second rich wife is heiress to the Heinz catchup fortune). These people scam as much as they can from the government in the form of subsidies and loans they never repay. (Solyndra is an excellent example of this kind and its execs were made up of Obama contributors). They are “leeches on society.” They are the ones who SHOULD be hated but they are the ones the liberals LOVE, since so many of them ARE liberals. This kind of “rich” creates NO product or service. They create no jobs unless the government supports them. (Just common sense)

NYC "Food Gestapo"

I’m beginning to think New York City Mayor Doomberg has a list of foods he wants to ban, and he has set out to do it, one food at a time. He seems to forget that ADULTS have the right to eat whatever they wish, even if it IS “bad for them." He does not have the power to deny that right to ANYBODY. But he does anyway. First it was “transfats.” Then pop drinks over 16 ounces; now he’s eying popcorn. I’m glad he’s not mayor in Denver, or we’d soon be in a PERSONAL confrontation as I tell him forcefully it’s MY right to decide what I eat, not his. Somebody needs to slap this would-be dictator down. (Rush Limbaugh)

No Posts for a Couple of Days

We're in the middle of a move and just don't have the time to do it until we get the move completed. Whatta mess!

Why More Mass Shootings?

It’s almost like Columbine (mass shooting at Columbine High School) signaled the beginning of “the season of mass killings. Since then there have been many mass shootings, all over the world, several right here in Colorado. The only one in Colorado that was stopped before a bunch of people were killed was in Colorado Springs, where there was ONE WOMAN who was (legally) armed and willing to use her gun and shot the shooter before he was able to murder more than two people. That tells me something: ONE PERSON with his/her own gun could STOP these killings. But don’t even try to tell the anti-gun freaks that. They’re “tone deaf” to reason. We’ve DISARMED ourselves as a means of self-defense. How STUPID!. Anti-gun freaks think laws against gun ownership and carrying will stop such shootings. I got news for them.

They won’t; wherever the anti-gun laws are the strongest, that’s where it’s the most easy to obtain ILLEGAL GUNS. Notice you never hear about a mass shooting done at a gun show or a police station. Why is that? Simple; would-be shooters know there are many guns there carried by people who know how to use them and aren’t afraid to use them. Most people aren’t stupid. They won’t “go on a shooting spree” just because they can own and carry the means of self-defense, a gun. But they WILL “spring into action” and shoot a would-be mass killer before he is ale to kill more than one or two. That was PROVEN in Colorado Springs by a very small woman nobody would expect to be a heroine. The “anti-gun freaks” have a very low opinion of the intelligence and self-control of the average person they think they’ll go out and shoot people every chance they get. But that won’t happen.

Robert Heinlein said once, “an armed society is a polite society.” He tossed that one off as an aside in one of his books but it is a PROFOUND statement. Ignorant people ban guns. They might as well put up a sign that says, “Come on in and shoot us. No guns here!” When are the “Anti-gun fools” going to learn? Probably never, because their minds re closed to ANY suggestion that more guns in the hands of people who know how to use them and aren’t afraid to do so will STOP such mass shootings in their tracks. The would-be mass shooters will DIE before they can kill more than one or two with their either ILLEGAL or legally-obtained guns. I notice that many of these mass shooters got their guns legally, which reinforced my opinion that laws against gun ownership and carrying DO NOT WORK to keep guns out of the hands of such people. If they want to go out and kill, NO amount of anti-gun laws will stop them. They’ll get their guns SOME way, even if they have to STEAL them, as some of them have done. There is no such thing as the ABSENCE of guns in our society. They exist. You can’t get rid of them, physically.

Make all the laws you want, they will still exist, and the “bad guys” will always be able to get their hands on one (or more). It’s like trying to put toothpaste back in the tube. The only solution is to allow honest, intelligent people to buy and carry the means to their own self-defense (and that of others), a gun. John Lott wrote a book with the title, “More Guns, Less Crime.” It was ridiculed by the anti-gun freaks, but it has proven to be very true. Wherever honest people can carry guns, violent crime has gone down, significantly. It’s time intelligent people overrode the efforts of the ignorant anti-gun freaks and let people take care of their own self-defense. The cops can’t do it, all they can do is write down the names of the dead and injured when they get there, usually AFTER the violence has been done). They did it in Florida, and many other states. And violent crime predictably went down. (Amazon)

No, Islam Will NOT "Rule the World"

There’s a “Global Caliphate Conference” in Chicago (Obama’s home town) that was cancelled after major protests against it. They still say “Sharia WILL rule the world!” How cocky are they? Sharia is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and there is NO WAY we are going to get rid of our Constitution! Thus, there is NO WAY Sharia Law will EVER “rule” in America. They might get a small number of decisions that MIGHT conform to Sharia Law, but such decisions will REMAIN few and far between. Sharia Law will NEVER “gain a foothold” here, and those who think it will are FOOLS. (The Blaze)

Bush Didn't do It!

Obama is trying to say Bush started what became “Fast & Furious,” but he didn’t. His “similar” program had a very different goal than Obama’s, ended TWO YEARS BEFORE Obama’s started when it was found to be not working. Obama started his to defame gun dealers in America and got a lot of people KILLED. There’s little similarity between Bush’s program and Obama’s. There might be a similarity ONLY in Obama’s mind. Bush’s program sold guns to cartels to find out where they were so they could be arrested, and included a GPS unit in each gun. When it was found that the cartels were finding and removing these GPS units, the program was cancelled. When Obama started his, it was to “prove” his fantasy that most of their guns came from the U. S. and included NO GPS units. Bush’s program got nobody killed, and Obama’s got 200 Mexicans killed, and two federal agents. Obama ordered his people NOT to attempt to “follow the guns” while Bush’s was TO follow the guns to their destination so they could arrest the cartel members. Additionally, Bush’s operation had the full knowledge and cooperation of the Mexican government—Obama’s did not. (On The Record)

No, It will NOT!

There’s a “Global Caliphate Conference” in Chicago (Obama’s home town) that was cancelled after major protests against it. They still say “Sharia WILL rule the world!” How cocky are they? Sharia is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and there is NO WAY we are going to get rid of our Constitution! Thus, there is NO WAY Sharia Law will EVER “rule” in America. They might get a small number of decisions that MIGHT conform to Sharia Law, but such decisions will REMAIN few and far between. Sharia Law will NEVER “gain a foothold” here, and those who think it will are FOOLS. (The Blaze)

"Global Ban On Insulting Prophet"

That’s what Islamic leaders want. Of course, they never mention a “global ban on insulting other religions” while they gleefully insult Christianity and all other religions every day. I really get tired of hearing Islamic “leaders” telling us what we “have to do.” We don’t have to do ANYTHING to please “Islamic leaders,” especially as long a Islamic terrorists are killing us. What FOOLS they must be to even THINK we would listen to them. (Washington Times)

Muslim Infiltration

There are many Muslims in important posts in the United States government. I can’t name them all because to do so would take too much time and too much space. I will simply call attention to ONE, who is a “close adviser” and friend of Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State. That is Huma Abedin, a former member of the Muslim Student’s Association, the original Muslim Brotherhood organization in the United States while she was at George Washington University during the nineties She then moved to the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, the journal run by her parents and financed by Abdullah Omar Naseef, a financier of the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida. The very fact that a person with such a past can attain such an important and powerful position in our government speaks volumes to the ability of Muslim extremists to “worm” their way into position to do us damage.

If this doesn’t disturb and concern you, it had better start because soon they will have enough power in our own government to be able to institute Sharia law without opposition. And when that happens, we’re lost. Muslim loudmouths say there will come a day soon when we (Muslims) will run things in this country. And I believe them, if our current government doesn’t get rid of the ones now in appointed office while we refuse to elect Muslims to ANY office in the government. Muslim extremists will call me an “Islamaphobic” for this item, but it’s not “Islamaphobic” if it is truth. In any case, the very word “Islamaphobic” is a “made-up word to make believe ANYBODY who criticizes Muslims MUST be a bigot. That’s wrong. It’s one more con to silence people who criticize them for anything. If Islamic terrorists weren’t trying implacably to KILL us for not believing exactly the same way they do, I wouldn’t have a problem with them as I have no problem with Muslims who AREN’T trying to kill me. (Clarkcast)

Obama Is A Communist!

I know most people’s eyes glaze over when the word “communism” (or any of its derivatives) is mentioned, But the truth is, Obama IS a communist. No, he’s not a “card-carrying member of the communist party” but he IS a communist in every other way. He was BORN a communist; raised by communist parents; he had many communist mentors and advisers in his lifetime, and he still does. It’s hard to think he does not THINK like a communist; and he tells us he does every time he speaks. He speaks of “fairness” and “redistribution of wealth.” He talks about hating the rich and all they stand for. He places as many roadblocks in the way of the free market as he can, every chance he gets. It’s a well known fact that he is trying his best to make this into a socialist country and there are only cosmetic differences between communism and socialism. What did they call communist Russia? The “Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics.”

Obama THINKS like a communist—and he is the PRESIDENT of the United States! How did this happen? I think it was one of the founders who said, ”Our Republic will be gone when politicians find out they can bribe the citizens with their own money.” And he is doing that. He has promised us many things he should have no right to promise us, most of which he cannot deliver. But he hopes we will not find that out until way too late. How did we get such a man in the White House? When a majority of people LIVE off the government and the rest don’t pay any attention to what the government is doing, it’s only a matter of time. And that’s where we find ourselves right now. Obama is a communist THINKER. He BELIEVES that crap about taking from those who earn and GIVING to those who don’t, for whatever treason. Until we get him out of the White House we will continue to move toward socialism, and then it’s only a short distance to communism, with this country being the next “Soviet Union.” (Just common sense)

I Feel Sorry For Obama

He’s in WAY over his head. He has been “groomed” to become president from birth by his communist (Marxist) mentors, but he is incompetent to BE president. He has no ides what he’s doing, but listens to several different people, all of whom have different ideas on how to make a socialist state out of the United States and give him conflicting advice. When he attempts to do what they advise, it sounds like he is wildly confused. If he needs a number, like his 1 MILLION NEW JOBS number, he just “plucks it out of the air.” Nothing he has done has worked the way he SAYS it will, although it HAS worked to move us closer to socialism. What worries me is that maybe getting rid of Obama might not put us back on the right track, even with a Republican in charge. Progressives (communists) are still in charge of way too much of this government. (Just common sense)

Who Does He Think He Is?

The Egyptian PM (a Muslim Brotherhood member) says we (the U. S.) should pass new laws making it illegal to “insult Islam.” Is this guy completely daft? What kind of a FOOL is he? Obviously he just doesn’t understand the First Amendment of our Constitution and its effect on our lawmaking if he thinks we COULD pass a Law against “insulting Islam,” even if we WOULD. Maybe HE should pass a law against ATTACKING Americans. (Just common sense)

More Obama "Birth Evidence"

This time, in Britain, where nobody expected it. There’s a lot of “evidence” of Obama’s birth outside the United States, but nothing is ever going to come of it. The politicians (including Republicans) accept the phony birth certificate he produced, that was manufactured in Hawaii. The Hawaiian governor, himself a Democrat and friend of Obama (FOO), assures us it’s genuine, when we all know it isn’t. the mistakes made in preparing it prove that. Like calling the hospital by the name it has today, not at the time of his birth; calling his father “African,” a term not in use at that time, and other evidence of forgery. then there's the fact of his use of a phony Connecticut Social Security number and his use of the term "birther" to ridicule ANYBODY who questions his American birth. But NOBODY will ACT on what we all know because the politicians don’t WANT him to be foreign-born because of all the work that will make for everybody. At one time, I saw the question of his foreign birth as a means of getting rid of him BEFORE 2012, but now time is too short and the point is moot—unless thee is a chance of calling into question everything he has done or signed into law or regulation as president. I’ll just be happy to get rid of him on January 20th, even if the federal marshals have to drag him, kicking and screaming, from the oval office. (The Daily Pen)

Should Have Killed Him Long Ago

Now it is revealed that part of that attack on our embassy in Libya was to protest the imprisoning of the “Blind Sheik.” Remember, he’s still in prison for the first bombing of the World Trade Center; a bombing that killed SIX innocent people. How he escaped the death penalty, I don’t know. He should have been sentenced to death and his execution “fast-tracked.” Then he couldn’t be used as a “trading card” by other Muslim murderers. He MURDERED six people! What else do we need to give the death penalty? If Obama even CONSIDERS releasing him, Obama should be "run out of Washington on a rail." TODAY.  Update: Obama's government is "negotiating" with Egypt to release him when we shouldn't release ANY Islamic terrorist so he can go back and kill some more. It will happen AFTER THE ELECTION, whether Obama wins or loses. (The Blaze)

Obama's SSN

The question has long been asked, how did Obama get a Connecticut Social Security number when he has never even BEEN in that state (except maybe recently to campaign for more money)? The answer is simple. The number is stolen from a dead man, one Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) on or about March, 1997. Ludwig died, guess where! In Hawaii, where he spent the last few years of his life. Obama’s grandmother, “coincidentally,” was then working in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Courthouse and had access to the SSNs of the dead. Since Ludwig never received any benefits, there were none to stop, and no need to notify the Social Security office of his death, so nobody asked any questions. This was one way to “prove” Obama was a citizen, though the choice of one issued to a Connecticut citizen was a bad one and use of a phony Social Security number that had been issued to someone else is “prima facie evidence” of fraud. This is not discussed in the liberal media because it proves them liars. (Links needed)

Tired of Hearing It!

I’m really getting tired of hearing that LOAD about the current rash of attacks on our embassies being “revenge’ for that stupid video made by an idiot. Even the terrorists themselves are “joining the chorus,” hoping to be able to tell us what to do. An Islamic WOMAN drove a car loaded with explosives into a bus and they’re now claiming it is more “revenge” for that video. They have no understanding about the First Amendment and its effect on this situation In any case, They hope they can get us to BAN this video. Something that is NOT going to happen if the “powers that be” have ANY intelligence whatever. Frankly, WHO CARES if Islamic extremists are mad? They’re going to keep on killing people anyway, until we finish killing them all. (Just common sense)

GOP Brand Takes A Beating

According to Darrin Bell, cartoonist who does “Candorville in the (8/29/12) strip. The “reasons” are, Romney and Ryan REPLACING Medicare with “Groupon Specials” before “lathering all women and minorities in honey and throwing them in a bear pit.” This sounds like typical liberal (Democrat) lies about Republicans. And he properly identified a probable source as MSNBC. Both viewers must be really happy. The “beating” to their brand is only in Democrat and other liberal minds. To other people—people with brains, they are the last thing that can save us from Obama’s scams. (“Candorville”)

Third Round of Money Printing

Recently, Fed chairman Bernanke announced QE3, the THIRD ROUND of printing money without anything valuable behind it. To those who don’t understand that, think about trillions of dollar bills COUNTERFEITED with nothing to back them up. Just a bunch of good-looking paper. Every dollar of which that gets circulated dilutes the money in your pocket by a little more. The actual result is that everything you buy costs more. Which means the government has STOLEN more money out of your pocket without having to go to the Congress and pass a law, Are you going to keep letting Obama and his gang of thieves rob you? Or are you going to get rid of them in November? (Bloomberg News)

The Differencre

This is straight forward thinking... if you ever wondered which side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test! If a Republican doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a  Democrat (liberal) doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed. If a Republican is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a Democrat is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone. If a Republican is homosexual, he quietly leads his life. If a Democrat is homosexual, he demands legislated respect. There are many more examples, but you can probably figure them out for yourself using these examples. The difference is, if a Republican doesn’t like something, he doesn’t do it (he leaves others alone); if a Democrat doesn’t like something, he demands EVERYBODY be FORCED to do likewise, against their will. (Just common sense)

I Don't Believe It!

For some reason Obama doesn’t want us to think the embassy attacks are anything but an individual retaliation for a video that ridicules the Muslim “religion.” Maybe because it’s HIS religion. He has said it is on more than one occasion. But  one of the reasons I don’t believe it is that these attacks (not “demonstrations”) are too widespread and too well planned and executed, as well as too well armed. They are military operations, not "spontaneous demonstrations." The timing is yet another indicator that it is something PLANNED to coincide with the anniversary of what Islamic terrorism considers it’s “greatest triumph,” the second World Trade Center bombing. They try and convince us that went as planned, but I don’t believe that, either. I think they were as surprised as we were when those towers came down.

They’re not intelligent enough to have planned it that way. Now we’re getting word of Islamic terrorist attacks in AUSTRALIA, ferGawdsake! Obama still won’t admit they ARE at war with the entire non-Muslim world. Why? I still think we need to make even PLANNING a terrorist attack a reason for the DEATH sentence with a “fast-tracked execution” of the terrorists. Holding them prisoner for YEARS in Guantanamo, then RELEASING them to go back and swell the ranks of terrorists is idiocy. But something I expect of Obama. They need to be GOTTEN RID OF in any way possible. They don’t hesitate to kill us, so why should we hesitate to kill THEM? Click the link and take a look at this (partial) map of Islamic terrorist attacks all over the world. (Johnston’s Archive)

It's All About Gun Control

Why did they arrest a Marine hero and put him in a “looney bin?” It’s all about their campaign to first demonize those who went out and risked their lives to promote the nefarious theories of the “ruling class (unknowingly), then disarm them, as well as the rest of the populace, using that very populace to demonize them. As the liberals did after the Viet Nam war, they’re trying to do now with a new “modus operandi.” They want to demonize men (and women) who risked their lives for them while those liberals wouldn’t “dirty their hands” on anything dangerous. They called returning soldiers “baby killers” when they themselves, ARE the real baby-killers (abortion). If a limp-wristed liberal ever called me a dirty name for being in the military, I’d leave him lying in the street, wondering why he ever did that. Stay alert! They’re trying to disarm Americans and are coming at you from BEHIND (their favorite position). (The Daily Bell)

"It Wasn't Against Us"

That’s what our government’s “official” position is about the attacks on American embassies in several countries. And that seems to be borne out by attacks on other embassies; embassies of countries that cooperate with us. But that policy keeps Obama from actually having to DO anything about those attacks. He needs to be having his soldiers out on the streets KILLING Muslim terrorists, not PREVENTING the defense of our embassies by PROHIBITING bullets in the guns of Marines “guarding” those embassies. Let those Marines DO the job they’re SUPPOSEDLY there for: defending the embassy instead of allowing our embassy personnel to be murdered because they can’t “defend” the embassy by throwing rocks at the attackers. The link below is to pictures of Muslim terrorists dragging the body of our ambassador through the streets after they murdered him. Do we need more evidence? (Gateway Pundit)

A Muslim President?

I don’t necessarily agree with Hank Williams, Jr. that Obama is a Muslim, but his hatred for many different groups is obvious in his actions, most of which are “under the table” increases in regulation; regulation that is crippling them. I do believe he is "anti-American. He has demonstrated that. He has been very outspoken for his hatred of the coal industry, PROMISING to “bankrupt” them (which also threatens the electricity industry, which depends on coal). He hasn’t been so outspoken about his hatred of other industries, but his regulations that are CRIPPLING them, show it. I don’t think it’s so much hating “industries” as much as it’s hating the FREE MARKET and wishing to destroy it and institute collectivism (socialism). Unlike Williams, I don’t “hate” Obama. I just have no use for him. He is despicable in his actions, policies and wishes for this country. (The Blaze)

Why Do We Even Bother?

Why do we still have our young boys in the Middle East dying to stop Islamic terrorists that their president won’t even admit exist? Why don’t we just let “angry Muslims” kill each other off? They hate each other as much as they hate us, and for the same stupid reasons. We need to make even PLOTTING a terrorist act earn a DEATH SENTENCE. And we need to “fast-track” their execution. Why not? They have made being ANYTHING but a Muslim a reason to kill us. If we do that, the number of Islamic terrorists will become smaller and smaller as we discover and punish them for their crimes against humanity. We also need to BAN Muslims from emigrating to this country to keep them from setting up “sleeper cells” within our country, ready to kill on command from their “leaders.” It’s hard to tell the difference between “peaceful Muslims living here and Muslim militants waiting to kill us. Just as in their own countries, they live among us quietly, allowing their Imams in their Mosques to train their children to hate us and wish to kill us on the advice of their own Koran.

When we catch them, we need to sentence them to a quick death, rather than put them in prison where they can still be used to hurt us. The “blind sheik,” who masterminded the first World Trade Center bombing is still being mentioned, more than 12 years later.  Obama is DEAD and is still a “rallying point.” We hold them at Guantanamo and play the “prosecution game” while allowing some of them to go back and become top leaders in the war against us, killing more people, after promising not to do so when they’re released. The only thing they understand is DEATH, and that’s what their actions should bring them. Death WITHOUT being able to kill innocent people. Let them know that to do a terrorist act against us is to DIE. People still ask, “How are we perceived in the world now? What a damn fool question! Who cares? If killing Islamic terrorists on sight makes us “hated” more than does allowing them to continue their depredations, so what? I’d rather be hated and alive than “loved” and dead, and that’s what Islamic terrorists promise us. I’m getting tired of their using our own laws and sensibilities against us. It’s time we gave them what they’ve earned; a swift death. (Just common sense)

Obama's Contrmptible Apology

To apologize to Muslims for “allowing” a film to be made that “offended the religious sensibilities” is CONTEMPTIBLE, and Romney was 100% right to criticize him for it. Further, he was right not to wait for Obama to make statement because Obama might never do it. Those who say Romney has destroyed his campaign by his action in making that statement are FOOLS and should just SHUT UP! In this country you don’t “allow” such a film to be made. People have the freedom to do such things. In addition, I don’t think that film was anything but an EXCUSE to attack our embassies on Sept. 11 in a planned attack, using it as a “cover.” I don’t know what this mysterious “film” that nobody can find said about the Muslim “religion,” but it was probably 100% right. The Muslim “religion” is merely a political action bunch MASQUERADING as a “religion” to take advantage of the privileges accorded religions in this country while murdering our people for no good reason. (Just common sense)

Obama's Enemies

He has picked many enemies and will suffer for it. Enemies such as the energy business, which is essential to our very survival. He has "lined up" his enemies to oppose him and he doesn't even realize it. Enemies such as the oil business, which is also essential to our survival. I am one of those enemies but he doesn't even know me. Like all the rest of his enemies I will do everything I can to defeat him and send him packing back to Chicago where he will have to live under his former chief of staff--unless he "takes over" there. Unless somebody ends his miserable existence when his protection is no longer as strong as it was when he was president. I don't want to see him dead, no more than I did Kennedy, although I was also HIS enemy. I just want to see him GONE and no longer able to rape us at will.  One of my very first “political tracts” back in the sixties was titled, “Remember Pearl Harbor” and compared the Democrat  policies of “talking” while the Japanese prepared for war. I even still have some of these hand-lettered tracts left. If you’d like to see one, just send me a stamp. (Just common sense)

Awwww! Poor Babies!

Muslims can’t understand why we would “go out of our way to hurt the religious sensibilities of Muslims.” I’ll tell them why! After they get cleaned up from destroying the Libyan embassy and MURDERING the American ambassador after being told where he was by the Libyan government, they can listen to our reasons. What FOOLS they are! They wantonly murder our people and can’t understand why we retaliate. I guess they can’t understand why we would retaliate for their atrocities. The only reason why we can’t seem to beat them is that they “hit and run away.” They then hide from us until their next strike. We still get a few of their top leaders who can't hide as well. It’s hard to beat an enemy who are afraid to stand and fight. They “hurt our feelings” on a daily basis and still think they should be immune from retaliation. Damned fools! (Prairie Pundit)

They Don't Even Know How!

On this day eleven years ago Muslim terrorists stole four airplanes and used them to murder 3,000 people (including the first responders who died of cancer from the toxic fumes they breathed in rescuing the victims). Imagine their surprise when two huge buildings collapsed after they ran those airplanes into them. What? Do you think they were smart enough to PLAN that? Not a chance. Most of them could not even READ. Their leaders make sure they are sufficiently ignorant as to “buy” that foolishness they call a religion, but which is merely a political movement masquerading as a religion so they can not only fool their own people, but can claim the privileges of REAL religions while they murder people who do not believe the same way they do. They think they’re so smart because in eleven years we have not been able to beat them. But they have not been able to beat us, either. And they know where to find us. They were as surprised as we were when those buildings went down. All they hoped for was the murder of several hundred people in those buildings and on those planes. And that’s what they got at the Pentagon where they sent yet another airplane. They weren't so lucky when a bunch of brave Americans stopped them from crashing at the White House by overpowering them and crashing the plane in a field.

All at the cost of 19 of their crazies, who died in the plane crashes; fools who are still revered in Muslim countries as heroes and martyrs. Muslims “Danced in the streets” after this atrocity. Some of today's Islamic terrorists were but small schoolboys when 9/11 happened, but they've been taught to hate us all their lives. They still threaten another atrocity that will “make 9/11 look like a kindergarten picnic” but it hasn’t happened. And won’t happen because they have no idea how to do it. 9/11 was an accident and they have no idea how to create another atrocity that big, so they “pick at us” and run away to hide. We can’t beat them because we can’t find them. They hide among good people AND bad. They only come out to kill by surprise, then run away and hide again. We kill their leaders, one by one, and they are replaced by more fools, whom we kill next. To be named an Islamic terrorist leader is to die, because we will not allow him to live any longer than the time it takes to kill him. We will continue to kill them as quickly as we find them, and as soon as they name a new leader, we’ll kill him, too. They’ve picked an enemy that they can’t defeat, but they don’t know that. Bad luck to all Islamic terrorists. We will eventually find you and kill you, to a man (and a woman if there are any among you). (Just common sense)

Harry Brought It On Himself

The Washington Times is worried about the “increasing attacks on Harry Reid” after his lies about Romney not paying his taxes for ten years came out. Well, Harry brought it on himself by making a false claim with NO PROOF. He is now the “poster boy” for false claims against an opponent. Now even liberals on Fox News are using the “Reid System” of making false claims on camera with NO PROOF of ANYTHING. In one “debate, one woman (presenting the liberal side) claimed Romney actually INCREASED the welfare rolls and gave FREE CARS to welfare recipients. She repeated this lie FOUR TIMES, and nobody challenged her. This is how elections are won for Democrats. (Just common sense)

How Stupid Are We?

Some people say Obama is stupid. I don’t agree. I think Obama is one of the best con men going, and is being helped by other con men, Bill Clinton and George Soros top among them, all of whom want the same things. How stupid is he? He was hired by over 69 million voters who didn’t even do the most cursory background check on him; he’s doing a lousy job, with a record number of people out of work for a record amount of time; he gave guns to the Mexican cartels to bolster his lying claim that most of the illegal guns in Mexico came from here; he kills innocent (and guilty) people all over the world with drone strikes; he decides which laws he will enforce and which he won’t, and sues states who disagree with him; he more than DOUBLED the deficit, ruined our health system (on purpose), calls everybody who disagrees with him a racist, and yet has a good chance of being rehired. That’s how stupid he is. How stupid are YOU? Inspired by an e-mail sent me by Barry Cooper and my sister, Patti. (Just common sense)

They're Still Pushing It

“Global Warming” has been disproved many times in many ways, but supposed “scientists” are still using it to get funding for their pet projects. AlGore says “a majority of scientists agree with me” but they don’t. In any case, science is NOT an election. The one who gets the most votes doesn’t win. Science is science. Truth is truth. A is A. 2+ 2 is 4. A vote cannot change that, no matter how much AlGore might want it to be so. Excess heat and forest fires do not prove his theory. We have them every year. Long hot or cold periods are CYCLICAL. Sometimes it’s hot, and sometimes it’s cold. Thirty years ago climate “scientists” were worrying about “the coming ice age.” Then it went into a warming period and they “went nuts” about THAT. They even FIRED me from NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research) because they overheard me saying “global warming is bunk.” They couldn’t prove me wrong, and they’re SCIENTISTS. So they got me fired. (The Blaze)

Obama ADMITS Foreign Birth

Before he found out an alien could not be president of the United States, he ADMITTED to not being an American, but having been born in Kenya. Why has nobody seized on this and done something about it? Because they don’t WANT to do anything about it. The liberals have made more gains under Obama than under any other president. And if his foreign birth is proven to the “satisfaction” of those in charge, ALL his works might be reversed. They don’t want that, so they ignore things like this. (YouTube)

"Granny Gety Your gun!"

No less than FIVE armed thugs came into a store in Garden Grove, California and tried to rob it. But they didn’t plan on anybody there being armed (they never do) and willing to use her gun. But this little old lady did, and watching them trip all over each other trying to get out the door is hilarious. This just proves (again) my theory that ONE GUN in the hands of an honest person with the will to use it in self defense will make robbers (who are essentially cowards) think carefully about their chosen field of “work.” It happened in Colorado Springs, Colorado, when a would-be mass murderer was shot before he could kill more than two people by a pretty little lady with her own gun. And the more guns there are in the hands of honest people, the more often we’ll see such stories. (KTLA)

What Is A "Birther?"

It is a made-up word; a derisive term invented by Obama’s people to help him avoid the fact that he has never quite answered the question of his American or foreign birth. If he was born outside the United States, the Constitution PROHIBITS him from EVER being President of the United States. It is an important question that should have been definitively answered BEFORE he could even RUN for that office, but wasn’t. That was due to SOMEBODY’S incompetence, and should be rectified now, but won’t be because Obama has, so far, made the very question an indication of incompetence on the part of the asker. He released an OBVIOUSLY false “birth certificate” and claimed it was real, and therefore there was no further need to worry about it, and anybody who does should be disregarded and ridiculed. Not so. He should be FORCED to allow his REAL birthplace to release a REAL birth certificate. He should not be allowed to prevent it and if he continues to refuse, he should be summarily REMOVED from office and every action, laws or regulations, or Executive Order that bears his signature, be reversed as he is an ILLEGAL president.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio has even found that “numerical codes” on that false birth certificate show that those parts were not filled out when it was made, but were filled out later. Did you ever hear about that in the liberal media? I certainly didn’t. Then there’s the problem of the hospital; it didn’t exist, at least under that name, when he was born. His father was called an “African” in the “race” section. That term was not in use then. He would have been called a “Negro.” That, alone, should have been enough to prove this document a forgery. But the government of Hawaii, run by a Democrat, keeps insisting it is REAL, that Sheriff Arpaio is misinformed and stupid. Another indicator is Obama’s use of a phony Social Security number that was issued to a man, now dead, in the state of Connecticut. A state where Obama has never BEEN before he was elected! This government does NOT reuse Social Security numbers when the holder dies. Everything about this man’s background is questionable. Not just his birth certificate, and he fights every attempt to clarify things, “tooth and nail.” So far, he has spent millions of OUR dollars to bluff this issue. That alone, tells me a lot. So I guess Obama will call me a  “birther” and otherwise ignore me—unless he sics the IRS on me. But he will NOT truthfully answer the question: “Were you born in the United States? (Obama’s Phony Birth Certificate)

Still Blaming Bush

We all know that Solyndra was wholly an Obama fool’s mistake, but they’re still trying to blame Bush for it because the program Obama used to give $536 million to Solyndra in the form of loan guarantees started under Bush. But Obama was advised early on that the Solyndra loan guarantees were “a bad investment,” but he wasn’t listening. He approved it, anyway—and YOU lost $535 million dollars when the people involved (Obama backers) “took the money and ran.” Nobody really knows what happened to that money, and their “investigation” says there is “no evidence of political mismanagement.” Which is a good reason not to let the government “investigate” itself. The worst part of it is that Obama “fixed it” so that taxpayers were LAST in line to recoup money in the bankruptcy proceedings. This is but ONE reason to get rid of Obama before he foolishly spends more money than there ever will be. He has already spent more money than there IS now. (iWatch News)

Senility At The Convention

Obama forces called Clint Eastwood’s speech at the Republican Convention “senile and rambling.” But truth be known, the only senility shown at a convention is shown by “Old Joe” when he shouts, “Osama is dead and GM is alive!” But Obama didn’t kill Osama; Bush did that years ago when he dropped a “blockbuster bomb: on his cave with him in it, making of him a “crispy critter.” Terrorists have been trying hard to convince us he’s still alive ever since. All Obama killed was a lookalike, placed there to die in his place. As to GM, it now owes MORE than Obama gave it in an effort to “save it.”  But then, “Old Joe” and the rest of the Democrats aren’t smart enough to know that. (Channel News Asia)

This Is Gun Control

The pictures this link will lead you to will show you what gun control can (and will) lead to. Do you think this can’t happen here? Germans and Chinese thought so, too. Right up until the bullet entered their brains and they fell into the open mass grave. How stupid ARE people to allow the government to disarm them so they will not be “a problem” when their thugs come to steal what’s yours? The men pictured may not be familiar to many of you, since the liberal media has stopped talking about the best-known dictators and mass murderers of the past So look them up. Yes, all those pictures are old. Which is because the more recent dictators don’t allow pictures to be taken when they kill people. (The Right Planet)

Damned Fool Notions

That’s the GOP “war on women” and the whole idea of “taxing the rich” to pay for Democrat “give-away” programs. First of all, there ISN’T any such thing as a “war on women. It’s a Democrat-created fiction created to help Obama win re-election without the necessity of discussing his abysmal economic performance. The same thing is true of the idea of “taxing the rich” because “they’re not giving enough.” They ARE. The rich pay more taxes than any other single group. Fact is, 86% of ALL income taxes paid are paid by the so-called “rich.” The top ONE PERCENT of earners pay 39%, up from the year 2000 when Bush took office. These are figures from the federal government itself (The IRS), from the last tax year. Obama ought to know this. I’m sure he does, but he keeps preaching the LIE that “the rich need to pay their share.” What’s more, you could tax the rich at 100% (For one year because they wouldn’t make any money for you to tax the next). Back when the government taxed (stole) their earnings at 70%, they found a way to avoid all but 1%) and you MIGHT pay to run the government about a WEEK.

Furthermore, the very DEFINITION of “the rich” as “anybody making more than $250,000.00 a year is STUPIDITY and describes most of the politicians who use that definition. The Democrats CREATED the whole IDEA of a “war on women.” It has NO substance, just as with MOST of their ideas. I don’t think you’re really ignorant enough to re-elect Obama and the rest of the Democrats, based on these “damned fool notions.” PAY ATTENTION TO POLITICS! Politics WILL pay attention to YOU. Don’t let them CON you because you don’t know what they’re doing to you because you ignore it. The “rich” don’t need to “pay their share.” They already ARE. They’re just a convenient target for jealous politicians who think they should have, and be able to spend that money buying votes. (Just common sense)

Nobody Knew He Was A Communist

No, I’m not talking about Obama, though it is true. I’m talking about a PROVEN communist, Fidel Castro, one whom events have SHOWN to be a communist, AFTER he “took over” in Cuba, claiming to be a patriot and a “nationalist” until he got the power. Then he started making “changes.” (What was that Obama promised us?) People thought he would stop with the “big corporations,” but he didn’t. Soon he was sending people to their little hardware store: "Castro started with the sugar mills and the large industries, but they eventually came and knocked on the door of our family hardware store. My family had run this store for generations. They said, 'We now own the hardware store, you work for us. And that four-bedroom home you own...it is now our property too. You have to move yourself and the five children into those two rooms of the house, because others are moving in here with you.' " (A Cuban refugee who fled to America) This is how despots work. Take over in small increments while the citizens DENY that it can happen here—until it DOES happen here. It IS happening here. Obama now owns a large part of General Motors and Chrysler, all done “legally” while telling their bondholders (who invested a lot of money) to “go to hell.” Obama is using the time-honored system used by all would-be tyrants to take over SLOWLY, so people will not notice. Like boiling a frog by putting him in cold water and slowly bringing it to a boil while if they threw him into a pot of BOILING water, he’d just jump out. This way, he’s boiled to death before he even notices. You’d better wake up, America because there isn’t anywhere to run when Obama reveals himself. (Just common sense)

Couldn't Find Anything

The feds have shut down their “investigation” of Sheriff Joe Arpaio in retaliation for his investigation into Obama’s birth. Mostly because they couldn’t find any PROVABLE crimes he committed. They tried valiantly over FOUR YEARS to find evidence of civil-rights violations, misuse of public money, perjury -- and said prosecution was declined because of a lack of evidence or an insurmountable burden of proof.” Arpaio thanked them for working so hard and spending so much taxpayer money to clear his name. An obvious dig at the feds, who didn’t do it to “clear his name,” but to smear him—as Democrats still do. Next thing, they’ll probably send the IRS after him (if they haven’t already). The IRS is good at finding things that don’t really exist if they get on you. You won’t find much coverage of this in the liberal media. I guess USA Today couldn’t avoid covering it. (USA Today)

Nobody Knew He Was A Communist

No, I’m not talking about Obama, though it is true. I’m talking about a PROVEN communist, Fidel Castro, one whom events have SHOWN to be a communist, AFTER he “took over” in Cuba, claiming to be a patriot and a “nationalist” until he got the power. Then he started making “changes.” (What was that Obama promised us?) People thought he would stop with the “big corporations,” but he didn’t. Soon he was sending people to their little hardware store to take over: "Castro started with the sugar mills and the large industries, but they eventually came and knocked on the door of our family hardware store. My family had run this store for generations. They said, 'We now own the hardware store, you work for us. And that four-bedroom home you own...it is now our property too. You have to move yourself and the five children into those two rooms of the house, because others are moving in here with you.' " (A Cuban refugee who fled to America) This is how despots work. Take over in small increments while the citizens DENY that it can happen here—until it DOES happen here. It IS happening here. Obama now owns a large part of General Motors and Chrysler, all done “legally” while telling their bondholders to “go to hell.” Obama is using the time-honored system used by all would-be tyrants to take over SLOWLY, so people will not notice. Like boiling a frog by putting him in cold water and slowly bringing it to a boil while if they threw him into a pot of BOILING water, he’d just jump out. This way, he’s boiled to death before he even notices. You’d better wake up, America because there isn’t anywhere to run when Obama reveals himself. (Just common sense)

When Are They Going to Learn?

The anti-gun fools are already gearing up their foolish plan to disarm us in the face of an implacable enemy, using things like that unfortunate shooting spree in a Denver (Aurora) Colorado theater as an example of why we should (sic) get rid of ALL guns. What FOOLS these people are! If someone’s standing in front of me attempting to shoot me to death, I want that to be the last thing he does in his miserable life. You DON’T defend yourself by disarming yourself and hoping the criminal will do so, too. The whole idea is STUPID. Frankly, I’m getting my own gun. I know how to hit what I aim at, since my gun training in the military. And the ONLY “gun control” I recognize it hitting what you aim at. Yes, criminals WILL get their own guns if it’s easier for honest people to get and use guns. But they get them anyway. Laws don’t even slow down the sales of illegal guns. In fact, it only makes it easier to get them. (Just common sense)

Vilifying the Successful

They call it  “class warfare,” and it is. But under it all it is JEALOUSY of those who have “made it” in life. Not those who were “lucky.” Not those who “didn’t do it themselves.” The people who had an idea that they thought people would buy People like Mitt Romney, who WAS “born rich,” but who disdained it and gave it all away. He’s rich now, but he EARNED every nickel of it. Not to listen to the liberals (Democrats), who vilify him for BEING rich (though most of them are rich, too). But he EARNED it, while most of them INHERITED it. EVERYBODY wishes they had as much money as does Romney, but they won’t admit it. So they vilify him for it. Maybe if we stopped that, we’d find  REAL candidate, not an Obama, who is a confirmed collectivist. Collectivism has been PROVEN not to work, wherever it has been tried. The soviet Union used to be their “showcase socialist government”—until it collapsed when they ran out of “other people’s money.” Cuba is collectivist (communist) and is still around. But it is rapidly failing and will collapse soon. The average age of an automobile in Cuba is from 1950—except for those ubiquitous “government officials” who drive around in shiny new cars bought for them by the state (which has all the money). The point is, we should NEVER vilify the achievers because they do things that “make the world go around” and create all the jobs, profits, and new wealth that benefits us all. (Just common sense)

Anti-Gun Laws Kill People

Has anybody wondered why we’re having so many mass shootings in this country right now? It’s because of the proliferation of anti-gun laws and “gun-free zones.” Anybody who declares their property as “gun-free zone” is telling the “bad guys” to “Come ahead and victimize us. There will be no guns here.” Notice that people who want to do a mass shooting and kill a lot of people never go to a gun show or a police station, where they KNOW there will be many people who are armed and willing to use their guns in self-defense. Some people, every time somebody is killed or injured with a gun, blame the gun, in hopes of getting MORE anti-gun laws passed. But they fail to understand that criminals and crazies don’t OBEY anti-gun laws. Those who want to use guns to kill people WILL find a way to get their guns. Cars kill many more people than guns, but where are those who would ban cars because of it.

Where the anti-gun laws are the strongest is where it is the easiest to get an illegal gun. The “turning point” was the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan, which spawned the “Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.” A name showing lofty ambitions, but one which has caused the deaths of many people by making sure there would be fewer guns in the hands of GOOD people who could OPPOSE those who would use guns to do harm. The young lady in that church in Colorado Springs, Colorado has not been mentioned much in the press after she shot a would-be shooter who came to her church to kill a lot of people. Why? Because that story does not advance the position of the anti-gun fools, of which there are many in the liberal media. That sort of thing doesn’t happen very often because of the many anti-gun laws prevent people like her from being in the crowd, unbeknownst to the shooter. (American Thinker)

Working A Weakness

That’s what the Muslim extremists do best. So nobody should be surprised that they are mimicking the gang violence we already have in most big cities to cause their usual amount of strife and trouble. And Obama, doing as much as he can to “under the table” to help the Islamic extremist cause, has started importing entire communities of Somali Muslims. “Yes of course the Somalia Muslim gangs are growing along with the threat they present. The Obama administration is importing whole Muslim communities from Islamic countries like Somalia. Their refugee status determined by the UN. The "diversity" immigration numbers are doubling, tripling some months. Obama is probably an Islamic extremist, himself. But in the absence of proof of that, look at his ACTIONS to see he IS a Muslim extremist SYMPATHIZER. Don’t believe it? Watch what he does. That’s how you can recognize his socialist tendencies, too. (Pam Geller/Atlas Shrugged)

Bullying Gallup

Just three days after Gallup Polls published a poll inimical to the Obama administration, the Department of “Justice” filed suit against them. Is this an attempt to get them to “toe the line?” “In a move that could have chilling First Amendment consequences, the Obama regime this week showed that it’s willing to use the full weight and power of the Justice Department to pummel any media outlet that doesn’t toe the party line.” (Keyboard Militia) This looks to be in response to a Gallup finding that criticized Obama for “tinkering with unemployment numbers.” By the way: the action was instigated by a former Obama operative. That former Gallup employee (Michael Lindley, a former Obama organizer in Council Bluffs, Iowa in the 2008 election) will get a cut”of any moneys extorted from Gallup in this suit. It is doubtful if there will be any, since Gallup’s figures show that REAL unemployment figures, if known, would SINK Obama in the upcoming election. (The Daily Caller)

Man With Gun Stops Mass Killing

A man came into a store and bought a knife. Then he stood in the store’s door and began stabbing people as they came in, shouting, “You killed my people!” Then a citizen who was armed, took out his gun and told him to drop the knife or he’d shoot him. He dropped the knife and those around grabbed him and held him for the police. They probably did him a favor, stopping him before he killed anyone. That way, maybe he won’t spend the rest of his demented LIFE in prison or an insane asylum. This is proof  (again) that more honest people with guns can stop violent crimes. (WHPTV)

Democrat Racist History

The Democrat Party has a HISTORY of racism. It was DEMOCRATS that blacks were protesting in the South and their “Jim Crow laws.” Many members of Congress with a “D” next to their names were (and are) racists. The founders and many of the members of the Ku Klux Klan were Democtrats. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a racist, as was Hugo Black (D-AL), Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV), Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-SC), Jesse Jackson, he of the Hymietown crack, ran for president as a Democrat. There are many more, way too many to name here. Yet they continue to shout out that racism is the “private property” of the Republican Party. What a bunch of racist liars! Notice this page (linked below) is a GOP page. That’s because you’ll never find such a page put out by a Democrat. (GOP Capitalist)

Obama Plans to "Quell" Tea Party "Insurrection"

That’s what they call it, anyway. It isn’t an “insurrection.” It’s a loose organization of people who want their country back. But to him it’s an “insurrection.” He calls it that a to “criminalize” it so he can treat Tea Party members like “insurrectionalists” and criminals. Unfortunately, he has way too many people he can count on to think the same way he does and TREAT them as criminals. As witness the way they treated an ex-Marine hero (Branson Raub) who made some blog posts opposing his government. Now a second similar case has come to light, but the name of the victim is not yet known. It IS known that this guy was also a military hero and, while he wasn’t arrested and the cops DID have a warrant (unlike in Raub’s case) all his guns were confiscated and he was given an “order” to appear before a certain judge, who might just (as in Raub’s case) send him to a “looney bin” for “evaluation.”

Just being sent there makes it illegal for him to have ANY firearms in his possession. All this was backed up and the “raid” performed by the county sheriff, who really had NO authority to do what he did. As in Raub’s case, there were plenty of “plainclothes” men with guns standing around to keep people from coming too close. This is the beginning of the government’s campaign to “relieve” military veterans of their guns as quickly as possible, on phony causes. There WILL be more and more such cases, and they will be kept, for the most part, quiet. No newspaper or television reporters will be allowed to investigate, as each case will be marked “top secret.” That’s how the feds keep people from asking uncomfortable questions.(Before It’s News) (Small Wars Journal)

"Soviet America"

Obama’s administration is now using exactly the same methods used by the Soviets in Russia, claiming “dissidents” are insane and putting them in insane asylums—with NO evidence of insanity on the part of the dissident. Marine veteran Brandon Raub is the latest victim. His only “crime” is suggesting that the U. S. government was complicit in the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center. I don’t agree with that, but he has every right to say it without being put in a looney bin so they can “ask him some questions” about his posts on Facebook. (they had NO warrants of any kind). What really bothers me is how willing the local cops are to cooperate with the feds in such cases WITHOUT the most basic legal requirements. I also notice that he was shirtless, as are most "criminals" the cops pick up. I wonder how that happened. Did they drag him out of bed? Was he naked at the time? The way this was handled tells me we’re getting close to the time when I could be treated similarly for what I say in my blogs. And I don’t like that prospect. I’m expecting a knock on my door by the American Gestapo any time, now. But that will not shut me up. I will find some way to say what I think unless they kill me or put me in prison. And I'm old enough that doesn't frighten me.  (InsideNova)

Georgia Grandma "Shoots It Out"

The “bad guy” told her to give him her money so she gave him her gun, instead; one bullet at a time. He filled her car with bullet holes but failed to hit her. If he’s going to continue as an armed robber (after he gets out of jail) he’d better learn how to hit what he aims at. He’s “in custody,” but his accomplice (who fled when the shooting started) is still at large. This woman owns several convenience stores and never goes out unarmed. I presume she is licensed because nothing was said about charges against her (surprise, surprise!). The “accomplice” better stay away from this grandmother if he wants to stay healthy. (CBS Atlanta)

More Muslim Pressure

Muslims are not allowed to eat during Ramadan and they are insisting Christians, Jews (whom they want to wipe off the face of the Earth) join them, by law. They’re DEMANDING that laws be made to PROHIBIT eating in public by ANYBODY during the day during Ramadan. Who the hell do they think they are? Would they obey laws based on OUR religion? Never happen. So how can they expect us to follow THEIR rules? I’m certainly not going to do so. I’m INSULTED that they expect me to! Their customs are NOT mine, and I will NOT observe them. Let them observe them if to do so doesn’t get in the way of other people, but don’t let them DEMAND we observe THEIR customs. They say, “Eating in public during Ramadan offends ALL Muslims and those who do may have their blood shed.” I say, who cares if Muslims are offended? I don’t. Their very demands offend ME. Muslim extremists LOVE to kill people. Muslims as well as anybody else. (Bare Naked Islam)

Obama Is The Racist

He calls everybody who disagrees with him racist, but in reality HE is the racist in this picture. He has just proven it with his latest Executive Order that gives PREFERENCE to “African Americans” who have never been to Africa but are simply “black people.” But that’s “politically incorrect,” so he will not call them that. I do not subscribe to “political correctness” and will use the words I choose to use in all cases, not the words chosen for me by others. (Freedom’s Outpost)

Democrats Emphasize Islam

 I don’t know if Obama IS a Muslim or not. He CLAIMS not. But in everything he does involving Muslims, he takes the Muslim side. In 2009 he PRAYED in a Muslim Mosque, with his butt in the air as a good Muslim. He plans that Muslims take a LARGE PART in the Democrat convention coming up. Obama thinks people don’t NOTICE things like this. Being PRO-Muslim while we are at WAR with Muslim fanatics. What does he hope to gain by this? I don’t know, but I don’t like his favoring of Muslims over Christians, a religion he wants us to THINK he embraces. There’s nothing wrong with BEING a Muslim. Only with a president DENYING it while FAVORING them. (Patriot Action Network)

The Gates of Hell

George Bush, an otherwise not unusual president, told us, “Islam is a religion of peace.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Even otherwise “peaceful” people who are Muslims allow such things as are pictured in this collection. The murders, beheadings, and acid throwings are not only condoned by the Koran, they are COMMANDED for certain “crimes” such as the one where the fifteen year old girl refused a “sanctioned marriage.” Islam is NOT “a religion of peace.” It condones and commands the MURDER of a woman who has sex with ANYBODY but her husband, but visits NO punishment on the man involved. To them, “unlawful sex” is claimed even if the woman was raped and she is subject to punishment. Scroll down and see the REAL result of a Muslim world. One of the “crimes they kill people for is “insulting Islam.” That means ANYTHING we say that they don’t like. For that, they will behead you with a rusty dull knife. Frankly, my best advice to you is to get a gun to defend yourself from Muslims as they "take over" in this country. And they ARE "taking over." Slowly, insidiously. (The Gates of Hell)

Mark Martin Almost Killed in NASCAR Race

He was leading after sitting on the pole at the 65 lap mark when he got caught up in an accident between backmarkers and slammed into the pit wall at a point where there is an opening that presented a point where hitting it directly would punch through the car like an ice pick through butter and kill you. Fortunately, he hit it BEHIND where he was sitting and, while the car was totally destroyed, he was okay. I don’t know how they’ll do it, but that track MUST change that configuration before somebody DOES get killed. The accident upset and frightened other drivers; one (Brad Keselowski) even saying, “Damn! I never saw anything like that before!” interrupting himself during an after-race interview. (The Blaze)

Obama Controls the Means of Prosecution

Why is it we never seem to be able to find a president guilty of anything? That’s an easy question, and an easy answer: that president CONTROLS the means of prosecution for ANYTHING. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has two attorneys (who are answerable to Obama’s DOJ “investigating” the leaks we KNOW came from the White House. Even Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) knows this (though she still adamantly refuses to admit that Obama himself is responsible). They “took her to the woodshed” and she changed her tune within an hour’ predictably. But you’ll never find pout anything REAL unless the investigation is run by somebody the White House can’t control. Why is it only Republicans are calling for a special prosecutor? That’s because a Democrats doesn’t dare. And why is Fox News the source for this? Because you won’t hear about it except in a derisive fashion from the liberal news media. (Fox News)

Only A FOOL Believes It

They call us bigots for opposing the use of the word “marriage” to describe a “union” between members of the same sex similar to a “marriage contract,” but only a FOOL believes we are. They have been offered everything they want EXCEPT the use of the word “marriage” to describe their “unions” and have refused to accept it. Only a fool believes they want the “rights” without the use of the WORD. What they choose to do behind closed doors is okay with me. If they enjoy sex with members of their own sex (which I don’t understand), I don't care. But I categorically REFUSE to allow them to call their “unions” marriage. To do so destroys the very meaning of the word and is an anathema to anybody but militant gays. Now you militant gays can call me names, but I don’t care. (Just common sense)

Bloody "Gun-Free Zones"

“Gun free zones” are anything but that. They are the scenes of bloody mass murders all over the world. Gunners do not go to gun shows or police stations where they know there are plenty of guns carried by people who not only know how to use them, but aren’t afraid to do so. One such “gun free zone” was the theater in Aurora, Colorado, where a Jim Holmes opened fire and murdered ten people while putting another 50 or so in the hospital. This theater has a “policy” of not allowing guns into the theater in the hands of individuals (even if they have a “carry” permit). He did not go to a police station, which was close by because he knew he wouldn’t survive his first shot. He went where he KNEW there was only a SMALL possibility of ANYBODY in the theater being armed. Think about that as you look at just where the “gun-free zones” are, and compare that with the locations of the mass murders. (Just common sense)

Priceless Headline

On mail.com there is a story about that rock group that was arrested in Russia for talking against the regime. It is, “Russian Orthodox Church forgives ‘Pussy Riot.’ ” This is their name, which has led to this priceless headline. They were convicted of “hooliganism” for taking over a church and making a long “prayer” to be “saved from Putin.” (Why did they ever GO to Russia and DO such a thing?) “The church has been sometimes accused of not forgiving them,” the bearded and bespectacled cleric said. “We did forgive them from the very start. But such actions should be cut short by society and authorities.” Watch for Obama (if re-elected) to push for a similar law requiring people to be arrested and imprisoned for talking aginst Obama or anybody in his regime. (Mail.com)

The First True thing From Obama

 Truly, this is the first true thing Obama has said. He has an ad out now saying this election is “between two different visions” for our country, and he’s right. His vision of socialism with the government running EVERYTHING and supporting ALL, while taking as much from PRODUCERS as possible to finance it, and Romney’s vision of independent initiative, individual ACHIEVEMENT, and freedom of their own choice to make their own decisions in life. Adults are a lot smarter than he thinks, and smarter than ALL liberals (which is opposite to what they think). It is about the difference between collectivism (which involves STEALING from the producer and giving, unearned, to the non-producer) and individualism (which involves doing things for YOURSELF while not demanding “a portion” of what OTHERS earn). If Obama is re-elected, we will get collectivism. If Romney is elected, we will (hopefully) get individual initiative and rights. What Romney is promising is what we’ve experienced for hundreds of years: the free market. Which has made us the destination of choice for people wishing to better themselves, versus what the Soviet Union had for 70 years, and which recently FAILED. He wants AMERICA to be communism’s new “showcase country.” The free market has allowed us to eclipse countries that have existed for thousands of years, in little more than 300 years of our existence. Which do YOU want? (Just common sense)

Muslims Beat Reporter for Reporting On Them

They tried unsuccessfully to amputate a man’s hand under Sharia Law and he reported it. So they beat the hell out of him. For criticizing them. That seems to be okay under Sharia Law. Remember, this is the “religion of peace.” Even our PRESIDENT has said so. The same people who MURDER their daughters for going out with the “wrong man.” This is “peace.” Actually, under their definition of peace, all you have to do to attain peace is convert to Islam and do what they say. And don’t criticize Islam. For anything. For any reason. They’ll beat the hell out of you at the least. Sometimes they even KILL you. When are those who can DO something going to recognize this “religion” for what it is: a political system MASQUERADING as a religion so they can go after anybody who criticizes them as “anti-Islam” and against their “religion”for "religious oppression" when they're the biggest "religious oppressors" out there. They won't allow ANY other religion in countries they control. (Creeping Sharia)

"Tell Us How"

New York Mayor Bloomberg went on the radio saying, “tell us how to stop these shootings” (referring to the Colorado theater shooting that killed 12 (so far) and wounded almost another 50). And he’s right. Liberals, who think they have the answer, don’t. The answer is to loosen up concealed carry laws nationwide. Then there will be many guns in such places as that theater (unless, like the owners of that theater, they ban guns inside, no matter what the law says) and make sure there are many guns inside so they can “take him down” as soon as he starts shooting. This will save many lives. Anti-gun fools THINK they have the answer, but their answers just make sure there will be NO guns in that theater to “take him down.” Banning guns will not do it. You don't defend yourself by disarming yourself. No matter how many anti-gun laws there are, such people will still get their guns, somewhere. Legal or illegal. The ONLY answer is more guns in the hands of good people so they can defend themselves. It worked back in the 1800s, it can work now. And the number of “shootouts” weren’t nearly as high as “dime novel” writers would have you believe. (Just common sense)

Disciplined For A Difference in Opinion

Sgt. Mark Johnson was disciplined by being transferred from his supervisory position and placed on the night shift. All without “due process.” Why? Because he brought a Chick-Fil-A sandwich into the station for lunch the same day a lot of people showed their support of Chick-Fil-A by showing up and buying food from them, lining up around the block. Two lesbian officers complained that his actions “embarrassed and humiliated” them. I guess it’s against department policy to “embarrass and humiliate” lesbian cops. I think Chick-Fil-A has the right to their own opinion, even if it doesn’t agree with two lesbian cops. Seems like that sergeant has a right to his opinion, too. What do YOU think? Those lesbian cops have a right to their own opinion, too, but not when it punishes a superior officer. (Fox Nation)

Typical Democrat Ploy

And it was accomplished by well-known members of the media, which is well known to be the Democrat Party Newsletter. They searched the Internet to see what they could find, and without any attempt to check further, “discovered” a similar name on a Tea Party web site and immediately went on the air with it. George Stephanopolous, the anchor, (the man who LIED to his own diary when he was a Democrat politician), allowed it on the air without fact checking and it was Brian Ross who found it. Both Ross and Stephanopolous should be fired summarily and blackballed from ever working in the media again. Will it happen? Nope. ABC will make a flimsy “apology” and “speak harshly” to them, but that’s all that will happen because ABC’s top management think like they do. (The Examiner)

"More Flexibility"

Obama actually thinks he will be re-elected and that after he is, he will have “more flexibility.” He’s right about “more flexibility.” He will have a lot of it but it won't matter because he will be sent back to Illinois to obscurity. Putin thinks he will continue to have a communist “comrade” in the White House so he can “run” the United States by proxy. Something previous Russian dictators dreamed of being able to do. What is there about Obama being a committed communist that Americans can’t seem to accept? Just because people like Putin are working to make us think “communism is dead” in Russia doesn’t mean it is. After “the collapse” of communism in Russia, the same people remained in office. They just told us they “were not communists any longer.” But they WERE “socialists,” which is almost the same thing—only cosmetic differences. Obama was BORN a communist, RAISED a communist, and TAUGHT to be a communist all his life. Why can’t Americans BELIEVE he IS? If we keep him around and allow him to continue to make the rules for us, soon he will be our “president for life” and it will be too late. Wake UP, America! Get RID of this “cancer” on our country. Start “paying attention to politics” or communism WILL “take over” in America. Don’t EVER think “it can’t happen here.” It can. That’s what they thought in Germany when Hitler was consolidating his power while planning to murder Jews. Thanks to my sis Patti for this. (YouTube)

It's Not the Gun's Fault

I’m actually a little surprised that the anti-gun fools aren’t out “singing their tunes” more about all their stupid reasons why we should BAN all guns—which, of course, will NOT do ANYTHING to stop such things as the Aurora theater slayings. Anybody who thinks a CRIMINAL, such as this shooter, will OBEY a law that says he can’t be armed, is about as ignorant as they come. Anybody who is determined to KILL, will find a way, in spite of hell.. In places where gun laws are the tightest, that’s where illegal guns are the EASIEST to get your hands on. Criminals don’t OBEY laws. But more guns in the hands of people willing to use them in their own defense or even the defense of others (that such shooter don’t know are there) would make a big dent in their ability to kill at will. I’d like to have been in that theater with my own hog-leg. That shooter would have died after firing his first bullet and maybe 10 of those 12 dead would have survived. (Just common sense).

That's Not How You Make Profits

Liberals like to accuse Bain Capital of “loading up companies with debts” and “walking away with big profits when they go bankrupt.” I don’t know what their reasoning is on this, if there is any reasoning at all, but that’s NOT how you make profits in Bain Capital’s business. You buy failing businesses after being INVITED to do so. You try and make them profitable through better management. If you succeed, you both make a profit. If you fail, they go bankrupt and nobody makes anything. Bain succeeded in more than 80% of the cases. Some companies you CAN’T save. Those are the ones the Democrats concentrate on while twisting the system to make Romney look bad. This shows graphically that Democrats haven’t a CLUE how to make profit, OR how to salvage a failing company. (Just common sense)

This Guy's A Fool

NBC correspondent and former writer for the New York Times says, “A majority of whites have never favored equal rights in this country.” How stupid do you have to be to write for the New York Times and be a correspondent for NBC? Their “threshold” for employment must be very low if this guy got a job in both places. Talk about RACISM! This guy’s picture must be next to the definition of racism in the dictionary. If what he said is true, how did blacks gain as many rights as they have since the fifties? I’ve been alive the whole time. I watched it happen. From getting rid of the “whites only” drinking fountains in the South to electing a black (half black anyway) president and a BUNCH of black congresspeople. The facts deny his hypothesis but, of course, he will never admit he’s wrong. Liberal racists never do. (The Blaze)

Slapping Obama in the Face

Mitt Romney did something gutty. He named Paul Ryan, the author of the ONLY viable economic plan (that Obama rejected) out there, as his vice-presidential pick. I predict that Democrats will “go bananas” in the coming weeks to try and make Ryan unelectable. This choice frightens Obama and his crowd of criminals more than anything yet because they can see ‘the handwriting on the wall.” The federal marshals dragging Obama out of the oval office, kicking and screaming, in January. He says he will win, but he will not. He will lose by a big enough majority that he won’t be able to steal another election. He couldn’t have picked a better man. (Mail,com)

What's Wrong With Being Rich?

Being rich is usually the result of being successful in business, unlike Obama, who is rich because somebody else wrote two books for him that sold well. Being rich is apparently the only thing the Democrats could come up with to “paint” Romney as “bad.” They seem to forget their own candidate in an earlier election (who lost BIG) was much more “rich” than Romney, and, unlike Romney, he didn’t EARN his “riches.” He married them. Twice. Romney, at least, EARNED his money “saving businesses. His company, contrary to the lies put out by Obama, SUCCEEDED in more than 80% of the tries. They NEVER “saddled them with debt before declaring bankruptcy.” That’s the LIE generated by the Democrats. They do not make money by failing to save them, only by saving them. Now they're trying to say he is a FELON who lied to Congress about leaving Bain in 1999 to "save" the Olympics. Before that woman "lost her health insurance (she didn't) and died within 22 days of diagnosis (which means health insurance wouldn't have saved her--she waited too long) that is just another typical liberal (Obama) lie. (Just common sense)

Liberals Scared to Death

Otto Scott is credited with creating the “silent majority” quip that Nixon made famous, but wasn’t a factor in his election because that “silent majority” remained silent. It is no longer. The demonstration of support for Chic-Fil-A (of which I was a part) scared the hell out of liberals because it showed graphically that that “silent majority” was silent no more. It had “woken up” and was ready to throw liberals to the dogs where they belong. They’re frightened because they know liberals (and Obama) went too far when they had a majority in both main branches of government and moved us way too close to socialism. They “woke a sleeping giant” which is going to destroy the dominance of the Democrat Party for years to come—maybe forever. They may go the way of the Whigs. And good riddance to bad rubbish. (Political Outcast)

Raising the Race Card (Again)

They apparently don’t have anything else, so every time they get a chance they bring out the “race card” whenever ANYBODY says ANYTHING they don’t like about that FOOL in the White House. “During Monday‘s edition of MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” host Lawrence O’Donnell accused conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh of using “racist stereotypes” for advising presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney to point out that while Obama was experimenting with drugs, he (Romney) was contributing to the economy.” Problem is, it’s TRUE. Obama SAID so in his book, “Dreams of My Father.” So when did it become racism to tell the truth? When Obama got elected, I guess. And I think both viewers probably believe it, too. O’Donnell defended his comments by saying this: “But we can’t go after poor old Barack that way, because he’s a minority.” Why can’t we? If it’s true, it’s true. Truth doesn’t have an agenda. It’s just truth, whoever it’s about. (The Blaze)

The "Chic-Fil-A Controversy"

It’s WRONG. It has been built WAY out of proportion to its importance. And it is a good diversion to keep people’s minds off the president spending more of their money than there IS on his phony schemes that have, so far, failed miserably. It’s just NOT IMPORTANT in the grand scheme of things. The gay activists only want the NAME marriage. They have been offered exactly what they SAY they want: equality with married people for their “unions,” but without the NAME, “marriage.” They refused to accept it without changing the definition of the word “marriage.” I don’t care what people do in their own bedrooms, but it is NOT “marriage,” and can NEVER be, no matter how much they want to twist things. Fact is, liberals simply want to force us to do what THEY want, and they use this kind of crap to do it. They’re just USING gays to accomplish it. (Just common sense)

Concentrating on Negatives

Democrats only concentrates on the negatives when they talk about Bain Capital’s work. That ad showing a (supposed) factory worker saying “Romney shut us down” makes me sick. As much as the earlier one with a woman saying Romney “made me sick.” Romney did NOT “shut that factory down.” He tried to SAVE it, and failed. One of Bain’s FEW failures. They saved 80 some percent of the companies they took over. A FEW still “went under,” which was NOT Romney’s fault. Bain did NOT make money by shutting down factories. They LOST when that happened. They only made money when they SAVED those companies, which they did, most of the time. (Just common sense)

Gets NO Time on Liberal Media

A man goes into a store and buys a knife. Then he goes outside and starts stabbing people. Then a man who has a “carry permit” threw down on him and ordered him to drop the knife, which he did, instantly. He didn’t want to die, after all. They subdued him and held him for the cops. This should be a BIG national story . . . right? Not! Not in today’s liberal media. They don’t like stories like this that prove my thesis that ONE gun in the hands of a responsible citizen (unbeknownst to the bad guy), could put a stop to such “mass murder” attacks by letting people who would make these attacks be afraid for their own lives. What we need is “more guns, less crime.” But don’t try and convince a liberal of that. They’re blind, deaf, and dumb about it. (Gun Action)

Obama Is A Facade

Like the false-front buildings of the 1800s West, manufactured to move us ever closer to socialism (collectivism). We know NOTHING about him; his early life, his schooling, his mentors (except for those of a communist and socialist bent), his influences (which seem to be ALL communist). He CLAIMS to have gone to a famous college, to which other well known people such as George Stephanopoulous went at the same time, and do not remember him. He steadfastly refuses to release his (REAL) birth records, even going to the extreme of releasing an obvious phony birth certificate. He ridicules anybody who questions him about it, never answering a question on the subject. He avoids it every time it is brought up, I’m sure because it would show he is not QUALIFIED to be president of this nation. I think he is a “front,” manufactured by “the powers that be” to allow them to “take over” the government in a “bloodless coup.” (Just common sense)

Palin Wasn't the Mistake

Some people say Sarah Palin was a mistake and it was because of her that the Republican ticket lost. WRONG! She "energized the ticket, but apparently not enough to overcome McCain being on it. The mistake on the ticket was McCain, who was not, in any case, “ready” to be president. He had NO chance without her and came a lot closer to being elected when she joined the ticket. I heard her speech at the GOP Convention, which was the last REAL one she was allowed to give. She was “muzzled” by the campaign after that, which guaranteed less “oomph” as a result of her joining the ticket. Personally, I think she should have been the TOP of the ticket. They’d have won unless McCain still brought them down. (Rush Limbaugh)

Gutting Welfare Reform

That’s what Obama has done, not by law, but by “directive,” making a “directive” that REMOVED the requirement that welfare recipients must LOOK for work in order to receive benefits. Clinton keeps taking credit for that law, but he was “dragged, kicking and screaming” into the signing room to sign it into law after refusing to do so many times before. Republicans put him in a position where he HAD TO sign it whether or not he wanted to do so. And he didn’t. Now Obama has GUTTED that law, and you’ll never see many stories in the liberal media about it (except to criticize Fox’s coverage). Only on Fox, which the liberals HATE with a passion, because they not only tell the truth, they tell BOTH SIDES. (Fox News)

Harry Reid Has Sex with Dogs

And he sets his farts on fire. You doubt me? “Nevertheless, I can prove what I say as much as Reid can ‘prove’ his statements to a Huffington Post reporter about an unnamed ‘Bain Investor’ telling him that Governor Romney hasn’t paid taxes in ten years.” I’ve seen some BAD Democrat senate leaders, but Harry is one of the worst. He’s almost as bad a senate leader as Nancy Peelosi was a House Speaker. Does he really think ANYBODY with any intelligence at all will believe this crap? Maybe he’s depending on the stupid. (The Right Planet)

"You Didn't Build It!"

Obama is telling people who started their own business and worked HARD to build it that, “you didn’t build it!” Out of his own mouth he demonstrates his complete LACK of understanding of how business and free enterprise works. He thinks just because the government built roads for those “newfangled cars” to run on AFTER they became ubiquitous, that those road builders were responsible for those roads being built. NOT! It’s just the other way around (as a side comment, those roads were NOT built by government. They were built by private contractors EMPLOYED by the government, using money extorted out of taxpayers). Yes, people who build businesses into large corporations had help. But they PAID for that help and, by so doing, created jobs AND other big corporations, who ALSO hired people, creating MORE jobs. The IDEAS that created the businesses came from an INDIVIDUAL, who pursued his/her dreams and created JOBS for others as a side-effect. Massachusetts liberal Elizabeth Warren, who ALSO doesn’t understand how business works, says people need “infrastructure” built by government in order to succeed. Nay! The government usually builds the infrastructure AFTER the need for it has been long demonstrated. Even CBS News (not a bastion of conservative thought) questions Obama’s thinking. (ABC News/Jake Tapper)

Of COURSE GOP's Pushing It!

Nobody else WILL! The Democrats are saying it’s political (the Fast & Furious scandal) because only the Republicans are pushing it. WRONG! There were many Democrats pushing it. And we can't expect the Democrats (as an organization) to push it because it's THEIR scandal. They say it all started in the Bush administration. WRONG! Bush started something SIMILAR, and STOPPED IT when it was found the dope pushers were removing the GPS senders from the guns. Obama picked up the failed program and “ran with it,” but with many changes. First, there were NO GPS units in the guns. They didn’t even TRY to trace where the guns went. They assured the gun dealers what they were doing was legal (they were working WITH the government) and they’d be okay. Now they’re saying the gun dealers are at fault and are giving them a hard time. The ATF and other agencies were told NOT to impede the movement of the guns in any way. Bush started a very different program, with even a different name, and concealed GPS units in each gun so they could trace their movement, to find and catch drug dealers. Obama picked it up to “prove” that the Democrat theory that most guns south of the border came from the United States was correct so they could make more and tighter anti-gun laws (a typical Obama con). That didn’t work when the whole program was discovered after that Border Patrol Agent was killed, using provably one of the guns traded in the program. Now the Obama administration is in “damage control,” and if the Republicans REALLY do their jobs, this scandal should be the thing that finally SINKS Obama. I certainly hope so. (Just common sense)

Liberals Are Incompetent

They think socialism is the way to govern, even though socialism has failed, or IS failing everywhere it is tried. They think TAXING us is the way out of a recession. They think “profit” is a “dirty word,” when that is what keeps the “wheels of commerce” rolling. They want to “tax the rich” more than the rest of us, even though “the rich” create ALL the private sector jobs that make this economy better by actually PRODUCING things. Just take a look around: who is in charge EVERYWHERE there is financial or economic “trouble?” Liberals have been “in charge” for most of the last 70 years, with ONE exception (Reagan) where everything liberals put in place was reversed and we began the biggest, longest lasting boom in recent history, and which was quickly reversed when succeeding liberal administrations “took over.” (Just common sense)