The Bull Cutter

Lucas is Confused

2012-02-01T13:56:00.000-08:00

He says he’s for democracy, but not CAPITALIST democracy. If so, what has he been practicing all these years while earning millions of dollars? I don’t think he understands what capitalism IS. Capitalism is a derisive descriptive word invented by the liberals (socialists) to describe the FREE MARKET, which Lucas has been practicing for many years. I wish there was a way to get to people like Lucas with intelligence, not ignorance, which seems to be his base when it comes to economics. He says “the rich shouldn’t be able to buy the presidency, but that’s exactly what is happening right now—and that’s NOT capitalism, it’s corrupt government. Obama has conned Americans out of a BILLION dollars for his re-election campaign, even though he has spent more money than there IS in his attempt to “socialize” this country. That’s more than anybody else has and if that isn’t trying to BUY the presidency, I don’t know what is. (The Blaze)

Obama Ignores Georgia

2012-01-31T13:59:00.000-08:00

In Georgia, they had a court case to see if Obama is eligible to run for a second term there; he ignored it without even the courtesy of a notice he would not appear. So they entered a “default judgment” in favor of the other side. So if this is treated like any other court case, he will not be on the Georgia ballot in the 2012 election and will not receive Georgia’s votes. But with Obama, who knows what will happen? He has a way of “slithering around” the law in just about all cases. I had to really search for this item and the only sources for it were the “right-wing blogs.” The liberal media ignored it altogether. Even Fox. (Jefferson’s Rebels)

Everything is Backward

2012-01-31T13:56:00.000-08:00

That’s what it seems to be for liberals. Wasn’t it Harry Reid, the most visible (outside of Obama) liberal, who said, George Bush’s “surge” will fail, and said not a word when it succeeded? Of course, Reid repeated the fiction that paying taxes was “voluntary.” But just try and not pay them and see how “voluntary” they are. Now he’s saying, “Social Security is a program that works and is going to be fully funded for the next 40 years.” (Of course, that’s only true if the general fund is tapped on a regular basis). And remember, we’re OUT of money, NOW. He said the Tea Party was a “temporary thing” and would not have a significant effect on the government, something 67 of his defeated colleagues might dispute. Reid has been wrong on almost everything, accidentally, or on purpose. He needs to go, right along with Obama. (American Thinker)

It's Racism! It's Racism!

2012-01-29T13:35:00.000-08:00

That’s the only thing it CAN be if a blond woman shook her finger in the face of a black man, right? WRONG!. Forget that black man is In the process of destroying this country, economically, racially, militarily, and in every other way possible. Forget the first thing that black man did on landing in the state in which she is the chief executive is to take her to task for telling the truth in her book about his actions in REFUSING to enforce the federal immigration laws he is SWORN to enforce and worse, SUED her state for insisting he do so. Forget he turned his back on the governor of the state and walked away when she asked questions he couldn’t answer. Racism is a charge liberals have used so often they’ve worn it out and NOBODY, not even their liberal friends, believe it any more. How STUPID are they to cling to this astoundingly STUPID charge all the time! It’s all they’ve got in most cases to keep from having to argue ANYTHING on the issues. They're blaming Jan Brewer for the exchange, but the fault is ALL with OBUMA. There's a little bit of difference here; King wasn't the chief executive of a state that George Wallace was undermining and was being "dissed" by George and the entire government, he was JAILED for his trouble, and MURDERED.(The Blaze)

Where Is It Written?

2012-01-29T13:33:00.000-08:00

Where is it written in the Constitution that government has the power to force private enterprise to spend money on stupid, useless things? Like the law in Minnesota forcing a funeral home that wants to open a new location to build a useless, non-functioning embalming room into it before they can get the right to open it? Seems to me they already have the right to open a new location without spending money on useless government dictated things. (YouTube)

Don't Mess With Arizona!

2012-01-28T14:59:00.000-08:00

Obama got off a plane in Phoenix, Arizona and met its governor (Jan Brewer) face-to-face. He thought he could intimidate her by criticizing her book, “Scorpions for Breakfast. Remember, he SUED Arizona for making a law demanding the federal government actually ENFORCE their own immigration laws and she opposed that in many ways. Then he turned his back rudely and walked off. It was typical "thin-skinned" Obama. She says she was “cordial,” but her “body language” in the published picture of her pointing her finger in his face while shouting at him puts the lie to that. Of course, since this picture will probably be the only one we ever see of this meeting, we’ll never know for sure, will we? But my impression of Jan is, “don’t mess with her; she’ll mess you up.” (Drudge Report)

Every Single Day He Deserves It!

2012-01-28T14:57:00.000-08:00

Jerry Springer hollers at Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson, “Every day you bash Obama!” He says, “Every single day there’s something bad about Obama!” The thing this fool doesn’t even know is that every day Obama gives Fox (and others if they would) something bad to talk about. There’s nothing GOOD to talk about regarding Obama. So why SHOULDN’T they talk about the bad things there are about Obama? It pains me to hear people like Springer spout the crap they spout because I know they KNOW NOTHING and are ever ready to tell you how little they know. (The Blaze)

Seal Missions Aren't Going To Save Him

2012-01-26T14:03:00.000-08:00

Obama is “approving” various popular missions for the “Seal Team 6,” hoping to capitalize on it in the next election, thinking people will re-elect him as a result. They won’t. He has done far too much damage to this country for a couple of missions by brave men to cause him to be re-elected so he can do further damage to this country. Obama is just proving how LOW he can go in his efforts to be re-elected to another term, during which he plans to figure out a way to be named “president for life.” It’s not going to work. The American people are too smart for that, and now they are “paying attention” to the scurrilous things he’s doing. (Just common sense)

Keeping Straits of Hormuz Open

2012-01-26T14:01:00.000-08:00

If Ahmadinijerk sends his navy to block the straits of Hormuz, it’ll be the last thing this navy ever does. If he thinks he can fight off the American navy, he’s stupid. But we’ve known that for a long time, now, so I expect him to try. His pitiful little navy isn’t a “pimple on the butt” of the American navy. One carrier is enough to destroy the whole thing without even interrupting their dinner. If Ahmadinijerk wants to die politically in his own country, let him try it. The Mullahs will not like having their entire navy blown out of the water. (The Blaze)

Secretary Pays More

2012-01-25T13:29:00.000-08:00

Millionaire Warren Buffett says his SECRETARY pays more in taxes than he does, and that’s wrong. It WOULD still be wrong if it were not a lie, told to support Obama’s scheme to tax millionaires at a higher rate than us “average people” (translation: “peons”) She pays her taxes at INCOME TAX RATES (35%) while he pays his at CAPITAL GAINS RATES (15%). He doesn't earn wages. It’s “apples and oranges,” what liberals claim Fox uses in their stories. Actual money? She pays a lot LESS than he does, even at 15% vs. her 35%. He GIVES AWAY more than that to charity. Why did he tell that lie? To “pull up the ladder” after he “got his.” (Just common sense)

The Next to Be Klled

2012-01-25T13:27:00.000-08:00

Maybe they’ll have to wait in line while we kill other Islamic terrorists, but they will soon die, and good riddance. Any American who is stupid enough to buy the Islamic terrorist line and goes around killing innocent people NEEDS to be killed. This is the only intelligent way to deal with these murderers without reason. Notice all the terrorists in this picture have their faces covered. That’s so they cannot be identified later and prosecuted for the crimes against humanity they commit. Real soldiers, in a legitimate war, don’t cover their faces. They don’t need to. These do. (The Blaze)

"Direspecting" The Office

2012-01-24T15:34:00.000-08:00

They say Colorado Rep. Doug Lamborn is “disrespecting the office of president" by refusing to attend the “State of the Union blather-fest” by Barack Obama. No, he isn’t; Obama beat him to it by a mile. Obama “disrespects the office” every day by the things he does. Many people have refused to visit him in the “Offal Office” and some have refused to shake his hand. I would do likewise. If I ran into Obama on the street and he offered his hand, I’d refuse it. Obama is himself an INSULT to the office of president of the United States. As long as he holds that office, I have NO respect for the office. “Lamborn last made headlines in August, when he compared the idea of working together with Obama to “touching a tar baby.” They give link after link they SAY shows his “racial comment,” but I couldn’t find him SAYING it in any of them. If anybody can truly point it out to me, I’d appreciate it. (Washington Post) Did he, or did the Democrats just SAY he said that, bringing out the “race card,” as usual. Lamborn is a Republican. Therefore, he is a racist, according to the liberals (Democrats). But I don’t care if Obama is black, white, pink, or GREEN. He’s destroying this country and I want nothing to do with him. They can INTIMATE I am a racist all they want; but that doesn’t make it true. (The Washington Post)

He Should Stop Being An Ass

2012-01-24T15:32:00.000-08:00

George Soros feels he has been “the victim” of Glenn Beck and Fox News assassins. Poor baby! Maybe he should stop being an ass, putting his money and his influence behind so many subversive acts. He is behind everything intelligent Americans deplore, including “Occupy Whatever.” He hides his participation and Glenn Beck is just about the only one who talks about what he does. If that makes him a “victim,” then so be it. He has been responsible for the economic collapse of several countries in the past, and he is diligently working to bring the United States down the same way. (The Blaze)

It's Not Because You're Successful

2012-01-22T15:21:00.000-08:00

Romney says, as he releases his tax returns (some of them), that the “Democrats will attack me because I’ve been successful.” No; they’ll attack you because you’re running for president, and will USE your success against you. But not until after they’ve seen to it you are the Republican candidate, since they think “you’re easy.” Actually, the Democrats are still pushing you to get rid of other, better candidates. You think nobody knows how liberal you actually ARE, don’t you? I know, and others who pay attention know. Democrats know. That’s why they’re still pushing your candidacy, because they know just how liberal you are. They figure they can beat the likes of you easily, like they did McCain and Dole, two of the previous “beatable” Republicans they conned us (not me) into running. McCain scared the hell out of them when he chose Sarah Palin for the VP spot, but they still whupped him. They think they've "gotten rid" of Sarah. But they may be in for a surprise. (CNS News)

Americans Pee on Taliban Dead

2012-01-22T15:18:00.000-08:00

Yes, it’s shocking for us to do something like that. But compare it with the things Islamic terrorists do to the people they kill; hang them from bridge rails, drag their corpses through the city, film their beheadings. Nobody criticizes any of these things, but they criticize a few angry soldiers peeing on a few corpses. I'like to do it on a LIVE Taliban. It would be a worse insult to just walk on them because just showing the bottom of your shoes to a Muslim is a supreme insult. It amazes me how people who should know better criticize US for doing things like this, but say nary a word about the things the Islamic terrorists (note I did not say “Muslims”) do, routinely. (The Blaze)

You're Being Played, America

2012-01-21T13:37:00.000-08:00

Marines peeing on the dead bodies of some “innocent” Islamic terrorists. It’s an OUTRAGE!” At least according to what Pam Geller of “Atlas Shrugs” calls the “enemedia. The average American, not so much. You should see what Islamic terrorists do to the real innocent people (including children) they kill. They behead them before cameras; they hang their bodies from bridges; they drag their bodies through the streets, yet there’s not a peep of outrage from Pam’s “enemedia.” Do they want our soldiers to return home to the same kind of “welcome” they got after Viet Nam? I don’t know; I do know they couldn’t do anything else to better ensure that than what they’re doing now. Is it right to pee on a dead enemy? Probably not. But it’s not nearly as big a thing as the “enemedia” wants us to think. (Pam Geller/World Net Daily)

"Letting the Cat Out of the Bag"

2012-01-21T13:34:00.000-08:00

The Socialist Party of America is telling Rick Perry to stop calling Obama a socialist. Apparently they don’t like the truth. Obama IS a socialist and is trying his best to make this into a socialist country which, if he succeeds, will destroy it. But he doesn’t care. There isn’t a country in existence with a socialist government that is capable of “taking us over.” But if Obama has his way we will beat ourselves. Ask yourself: why is this country able to outdo countries that have been around for thousands of years and become the “destination of choice” for people who want to better themselves? All in less than 300 years? The answer is the free market and individualism. But collectivists (socialists) will not admit that, even when the evidence is right before their eyes. (Cowboy Byte)

It doesn't Take Much

2012-01-19T13:08:00.000-08:00

Just mispronounce something. That’s what happened when Gingrich mispronounced the name “Juan” in answering a question. Gawd, it amazes me how easily liberal fools like Chris Matthews let the term “racist” roll off their tongues. They are constantly LOOKING for “evidence” of racism and they “find it” where it isn’t. But they assume it is, and declare it. I think THEY are the racists. Non-liberals aren’t thinking about race all the time, but leftists seem to be. Otherwise why would they find a racist under every bed? The good part is the "racist" tag is losing its effectiveness because of overuse. (The Blaze)

Michelle is a Racist

2012-01-19T13:05:00.000-08:00

She doesn't like white people. Obama finds it easy to call everybody who disagrees with him a racist with no proof of anything, but he fails to recognize (on purpose?) the racism within his own family—or is he as racist as his wife? Look at the picture that goes with this article. It is a common face for Michelle: questioning and disapproving. She was only “proud” of Americans after her husband was nominated to run for president. With Obama, she sat in Rev. Wright’s church and listened to his ultra-racist diatribes for 20 years and they both say they “heard nothing that would be defined as racist” in that 20 years. This is one of his most outrageous lies. If they sat in that church and listened to Wright’s lies for 20 years and got NOTHING out of it, they weren’t listening. And Obama is ALWAYS listening, so he can find something he can use for his own purposes. Michelle likes to think she knows what foods are best for all of us while her husband eats hot dogs and hamburgers whenever she is away. Meanwhile she eats spaghetti and meatballs when she thinks nobody is looking. This is as phony a family as I’ve seen in a long time. (The Blaze)

He's A FOOL If He Believes That

2012-01-18T13:38:00.000-08:00

Bill Clinton says MSNBC has become “our (left) version” of Fox. But there’s no comparison. Fox tells the truth and reveals both sides. MSNBC lies and tells only the liberal side. What the hell does he think he’ll gain by this lie? Is he trying to compete with Obama to be the biggest, most obvious liar? I know Obama lies a lot, but even HE is exceeded by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who wouldn’t know the truth if she saw it. (The Blaze)

American Royalty?

2012-01-18T13:36:00.000-08:00

That’s what the Kennedy family thinks they are, anyway. Now that pregnant girlfriend killer Teddy Kennedy is dead (good riddance) Joe Kennedy III is now running for economic downturn author Barney Frank’s seat, which he is giving up because he knows he can’t be elected again. They think a “strange new Kennedy” with no political history CAN be elected and “keep that seat in the family” since the original “Kennedy seat” went to a Republican. But if a majority of people “paid attention to politics,” it would not happen because anybody who DOES pay attention KNOWS yet another Kennedy is bad for us because one day he will be running for president after he does all the damage he can in Congress. Frankly, I think the State of Massachusetts ought to change its name to “The state of Kennedy” to better reflect their political bias. (The Blaze)

National Pee on a Terrorist Day

2012-01-17T13:42:00.000-08:00

That’s what a blog called “The Political Jungle” has declared January 14, 2012. I agree. Many people think peeing on a terrorist is a bad thing, and maybe it is; but it’s not nearly as bad as the things they do to our dead. So if I got a chance to pee on a dead Islamic terrorist (Especially if I had killed him), I would do it gleefully with my foot on top of his head to hold his mouth open. I understand showing a Muslim the bottom of your shoe is a profound insult, so I would be sure to do it. I would think peeing in his mouth would also be a profound insult, even if he were dead. But killing him is the most profound insult of all, and I wish I were young enough to go there and get my share of it. Too bad. (The Political Jungle)

OWS Is "Acorn"

2012-01-17T13:40:00.000-08:00

You thought ACORN “went away,” didn’t you? That’s what the liberals behind it WANTED you to think. But they’re behind the “Occupy Wherever” movement. They’re giving them money and paying to hire people to go door-to-door pushing their business, which is getting a “free ride” with all the rest of us footing the bill. My bet is you’ll find ACORN behind many useless liberal plans and movements in the coming weeks, months, and years. All without anybody mentioning the name ACORN. That’s how liberals play it. When one organization of theirs becomes too well known, just shut it down and reorganize under a different name (or any number of names) so we won’t be aware they’re still operating. You can bet this is what’s happening with ACORN/OWS. And why is it Fox that breaks this? Because no one else will. (Fox News)

A Bad Idea

2012-01-15T13:47:00.000-08:00

Peeing on the dead bodies of our enemies is a bad idea. Those Marines who did it should be punished at a company level. This action should NOT concern the Secretary of State to the point where she goes on television to revile it. It should NOT generate all the hooraw it has, including publishing an “official” statement from the Taliban saying it was a “despicable act.” They are EXPERTS on what constitutes a “despicable act,” because they commit them daily. Another bad idea is having “talks” with the Taliban or any other Islamic terrorist organization. All they want; their SINGLE goal in LIFE is to kill ANYBODY who doesn’t believe EXACTLY the same way they do. To win it, they will lie, cheat, steal, and kill ANYBODY, including their own children. When it comes to “despicable acts,” they have NO room to talk and talking to them is futile.

The only way to deal with them is KILL them whenever and wherever we find them, in any way we can. Peeing on their dead bodies wastes the time we could be devoting to hunting down and killing more of them. Allen West, a former Lt. Col. who has seen action in the Army says this: “The Marines were wrong. Give them a maximum punishment under field grade level Article 15 (non-judicial punishment), place a General Officer level letter of reprimand in their personnel file, and have them in full dress uniform stand before their Battalion, each personally apologize to God, Country, and Corps videotaped and conclude by singing the full US Marine Corps Hymn without a teleprompter. As for everyone else, unless you have been shot at by the Taliban, shut your mouth, war is hell.” I agree with that, wholeheartedly. (Right Face)

EEOC Says "It MIGHT" Violate the Law

2012-01-15T13:45:00.000-08:00

What? “MIGHT?” What happened to “DOES?” If they’re going to send out a letter warning people that to require a high school diploma IS in violation of the law, okay. But MIGHT? Why not wait until they’re SURE? What fool at the EEOC authorized the sending of this letter? If it MIGHT violate the law, what’s the purpose of this letter? To INTIMIDATE those who can hire people and create jobs; that’s what. If they don’t KNOW it violates the law, sending such a letter is NOTHING but intimidation. (Washington Times)

I Feel Sorry for Debbie

2012-01-14T16:56:00.000-08:00

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chair of the Democrat Party, has got to stand up for Obama, which is an impossible job in the circumstances. He has ruined our economy and continues to do so, making it worse every day. But the lies she’s told eclipse even Obama’s. She even blames the shooting that almost killed a Democrat congresswoman on the Tea Parties. I’d like to see the logic of her reasoning on that, but I don’t believe she has any. I thing she just “pulled that out of the air” to support her other lies. Pat Gray, on the Glenn Beck show, called her a “vile, horrible, heinous skank.” This would ordinarily be a “bit much,” but in her case, it’s “too little, too late.” This woman should be run out of the Democrat party. She’s the best thing that ever happened to the GOP. (Glenn Beck)

NBC's Andrea Mitchell Racist

2012-01-14T16:52:00.000-08:00

She accuses the American people of “being too white” to re-elect Obama, completely ignoring the fact that he has spent more of our money than there IS, almost destroyed this economy to get elected and worked hard to make it worse since he WAS elected, and worked hard to make this into “The Union of Soviet Socialist America.” To her and other racists, there is no other reason not to re-elect this fool except for the color of his skin. That’s how “closeted” racists work. They accuse others of racism because they can’t find any other reason to get rid of a fool except he’s black. In reality it is the RACISTS who can’t find the reason. (Breitbart TV)

Abortion is Murder!

2012-01-11T10:56:00.000-08:00

No matter what pro-abortionists say, abortion stops a beating heart in a person too young to fight back. One too young to have ever even experienced life. It is INFANTICIDE, and the good thing about it is that the most babies who are murdered would have become sniveling liberals. Moreover, liberals are reducing their own numbers in the future by killing off their children. They even hate the name “abortion,” which is the proper name for what they do, besides murder. Now they insist their crime be called “pro-choice,” which. Like in George Orwell’s book, “1984,” was called just the opposite of what it was (govspeak), to keep many people from even understanding they are committing murder. I refuse to obey their commands to use that "govspeak."

Some doctors, who specialize in this brand of murder, kill thousands of babies every year. The doctors in the linked story kept a lot of the tiny corpses in a freezer for some reason, and when they started one abortion in one state, to be completed in another, they were caught with those tiny corpses and rightfully charged with mass murder. They’ll probably beat the charge because the government APPROVES of infanticide. But this does serve to illustrate the problem. I am not what abortionists call an "anti-abortion fanatic." I am simply a person who LOGICALLY sees what is in front of his eyes as what it is. And abortion IS murder. It does NOT involve the "right" of a woman to control what happens to her own body as prostitution laws do, but it DOES involve the right of that infant to LIVE. (American Thinker)

"Pistol Packin' Mama" Kills Robber

2012-01-11T10:54:00.000-08:00

In Philadelphia, a 19-year-old man assaulted his last victim when the victim’s mother came out packing a gun and killed him while he was pistol-whipping her son. Her gun was legally registered and the cops have (so far) not attempted to arrest her for killing that robber although that doesn’t rule out the robber’s family suing her for killing him. It wasn’t a “wrongful death,” but they’ll probably try and call it that in an attempt to punish this woman for defending her son from their predator relative. I guess they’ll figure if the dead kid couldn’t get money out of her son with HIS gun, they’ll do it in court. (KSEE 24)

"Living in Peace" With Islamic Extremists

2012-01-10T14:40:00.000-08:00

Liberals who are stupid (a repetition, that) think we can “live in peace” with Islamic extremists, who only want to KILL everybody who doesn’t believe EXACTLY the same way they do. Yes, there ARE Muslims who aren’t that extreme. But they are apparently few and far between and afraid to speak out, and the only ones who concern me are the extremists who want to KILL us. We CANNOT “live in peace” with them, no more than THEY can “live in peace” with Jews, whom they hate even more than they do Christians or members of ANY other religion. There is only one way to deal with Muslim extremists; that’s to kill them before they can kill us. Then we can “live in peace” with their bodies. (Andrew G. Boston/American Thinker)

We're Broke? Spend More Money!

2012-01-10T14:37:00.000-08:00

That appears to be Obama’s only answer to everything. Businesses are going broke? Give them money to spend! Governments are broke? Give ‘em more money. WE’RE broke? Spend more imaginary money we don’t have. Print, print, PRINT money so we can spend, spend, SPEND! What the hell is WRONG with this jerk? You can’t spend your way out of debt. But he apparently thinks we can. What this does is illustrate his INCOMPETENCE, if it needed further illustrating. Re-elect this fool and you will suffer. The problem is, so will I, and I have no plans to vote for him, ever. (American Thinker/Rick Moran)

Illegally Appointed Director "Goes to Work"

2012-01-08T15:10:00.000-08:00

He was illegally appointed as a “recess appointment” while Congress was still in session (I don’t know if there is a penalty for Obama in doing that, but I am not holding my breath until someone in Washington finds the backbone to call him on it). “President Barack Obama named [Richard] Cordray, 52, as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in a recess appointment during a visit last week to suburban Cleveland. Republicans critical of the new agency had managed to block the appointment since July, saying the agency has too much power with too little input from Congress. Despite Cordray's background of bipartisan appeal, Senate Republicans blocked his confirmation in December.” Obama says, “If Congress won’t do their job, I’ll do it without them.” Since when is disagreeing with the president and blocking him “not doing their job?” What a FOOL this president is if he thinks the American people will buy this bullsh-t. (Breitbart)

How Tea Parties and OWS Differ

2012-01-08T15:08:00.000-08:00

How many cops got stabbed at tea party events? And how many ambulances trying to take that stabbed cop were blocked at Tea Party events? OWS protesters have amply shown that all they want to do is make trouble for as many people who don’t believe the same way they do as they can. The only difference is that they don’t (yet) actively want to kill them, as Islamic extremists do. All the OWS demands boil down to one thing: they want a “free ride” at somebody else’s expense. Tea party people simply want the government OUT of their lives. They want less government, lower taxes, and for the government to get out of their way and let them make THEIR OWN way. They don’t want “hand-outs” as the OWS people do. They just want to be left alone. And they don’t want to irritate and hurt people to do it. (The Blaze)

Soldiers Died Because of Stupid "Rules of Engagement"

2012-01-07T13:52:00.000-08:00

Those “rules of engagement” are “politically correct” and could have been written by “Code Pink.” One is that no return fire is allowed unless you’re SURE there is NO POSSIBILITY that innocent civilians are in the area. The terrorists know this and make SURE innocent civilians are in the line of fire when they attack. Thus they’re able to easily kill hamstrung soldiers. Obama and his pals are wantonly KILLING American troops with their STUPID “rules of engagement.” And they don’t care, as most liberals don’t care about the deadly results of their policies. (New York Post)

No wonder We're Losing the PR War

2012-01-07T13:50:00.000-08:00

The "key moderator" in the Taliban-US talks is a Jew-hating radical Muslim Sheik who has no wish for those talks to be successful (to the U. S.). I’ve said all along that any talks between us and the Islamic terrorists is simply to give those terrorists more time to get their plans made and in readiness to kill more Americans, and it looks like I’m right, seeing who is the main moderator. (IPT Blog)

Obama Goes "Hog-Wild"

2012-01-05T14:03:00.000-08:00

This is how an elected leader becomes a dictator. By ignoring the “rule of law” little by little until HE is the only SOURCE of law. Then he becomes a dictator. That’s how Adolph Hitler did it in Germany. First he got himself elected Chancellor, then he created situations in which (according to him alone) required “unilateral action” without asking permission of the Parliament. Replace the word Parliament with the word Congress and the constitution, and that’s EXACTLY what Obama is doing. Watch: soon he will say he “needs another term” to complete his plans for us (Which include making this country into the Union of Soviet Socialist America), and will introduce a law to make it happen. It will be written in such a way that he will never again have to stand for re-election (But you will have to pass the law to find out what’s in it a la Nancy Peelosi) and will be “president for life.” Watch for it. It is going to happen if we don’t wake up and get rid of this FOOL. (CNS News)

Slanted Polls

2012-01-05T14:00:00.000-08:00

Just as I’ve always said, “polls” are merely a means to make the citizenry think what you want them to think, and no one really knows how they’re compiled. The latest evidence of this is the “poll” that says the most popular people in the land are Obama and Hillary Clinton. How they ever arrived at that with Obama’s REAL popularity at an all-time LOW is beyond me. Naturally this is a USA today sponsored poll. USA today is NOT the most NEUTRAL of sources. This is an obvious attempt to use a poll to create the façade of popularity for a very UN-popular president while lifting an unpopular Secretary of State’s popularity in case she is needed to win the election. Notice also the announcing agency is the Huffington Post, one of the most liberal blogs in existence. (Huffington Post)

Warning From A Muslim

2012-01-04T14:09:00.000-08:00

He says he is a “former Muslim” after finding that Islam is a “sick, evil religion.” But what he says at the end of this missive makes me think he is not a “former” Muslim. The Koran (however they spell it this week) tells Muslims it is okay to LIE to Infidels and I think this man is lying when he says he is a “former” Muslim. He asks: “Do you have enough bullets to kill us all?” My answer: “If we don’t, we will MAKE enough bullets and spend the rest of our lives killing Islamic extremists who try to kill us for not believing exactly the same way they do.” He says, “We will use your own kindness against you.” And, in a demonstration of his lack of education, he ends it with this message: “You are destined to loose.” Otherwise he tells the truth about how they plan on overtaking us. It will take a while, but they are well on their way to success because of the ignorant liberals running things in this country. (SIOTW)

OWS Wants Socialism!

2012-01-04T14:02:00.000-08:00

Which puts them squarely in Obama's camp. When will these dolts LEARN? Socialism has been tried, time and time again, and has eventually failed every time. Yes, there are a FEW socialist countries still in existence, being “propped up” by other socialist regimes that still have some of their subjects’ money left. Soon they all will be gone, and Cuba will be one of the first, since no other socialist country still rich on their subjects’ money is propping them up after Russia’s socialist (communist) government collapsed. Socialism is just one form of collectivism, which ALWAYS inhibits INCENTIVE by stealing the “goodies” earned by production and giving them to those who do NOT produce anything. Obama says “WE” no longer “sell America,” when it is HIM who is constantly running us down. What a DOLT this man is to believe WE will believe his crap again! (Just common sense)

Throwing Out the Baby With the Bath Water

2012-01-03T12:58:00.000-08:00

That’s what Obama and his illegitimate government is doing with the “Stop Online Piracy Act” (SOPA). Yes, there is a problem with online piracy, coming principally from communist China, but the answer is NOT to stop Internet users from linking to other sites, as this law does. Linking to other sites allows writers to refer their readers to the sources for their opinions and actually ENHANCES the activity for the other site, since not only their writings, but their ads are seen. The WHOLE IDEA of having a web site is to “get hits” and have your writing and other content seen by as many people as possible. Linking to it does that, and the site owners welcome it. This is NOT plagiarism, as Obama claims. But will this fact stop him? Probably not, unless sufficient pressure can be brought to bear. He isn’t concerned with logic and truth. Only his own opinion and ideas concern him and he dearly wishes for a way to shut bloggers up, which this law will do. It won’t shut ME up, at least until I’ve had my say. Then he will no doubt pit me in prison for saying it, regardless of the First Amendment to the Constitution if the United States. (The Heritage Foundation)

Ex-Cop Marine "Deals With" OWS Protester

2012-01-03T12:56:00.000-08:00

There ARE no “ex-Marines.” Only Marines no longer serving actively. This protester only got a few words out at the swearing-in of U. S. Rep Bob Turner (the man elected to replace the disgraced “weenie-wagging” FORMER congressman Weiner. The Marine ex-cop said, “There’s a time and place for free speech and this is not it.” He’s right: disrupting a solemn occasion like this is NOT “free speech.” There should be more people like this Marine to “deal with” the stupid people in the “Occupy Everywhere” movement. All they want anyway is a “free ride.” (New York Post)

"Pressing Ahead Without Congress"

2012-01-01T14:56:00.000-08:00

That’s what our new dictator Barack Obama says he’s going to do. Does he really think he’s going to get away with that? He’s not really “all-powerful,” but he thinks he is. The Constitution does not ALLOW him to "proceed without Congress." To do so is to violate the basic law of the land. I’m looking forward to the time when he not only exceeds his constitutional authority, but exceeds it in criminal fashion, so we can not only get RID of him, but put him in PRISON, too (if anybody has the guts to do so). “Pressing ahead without Congress” is not something a chief of state in this country can do. Congress is an EQUAL partner in governing this nation. The president is NOT superior to Congress, and he needs to learn that, or be gone. (Mail.com)

So What? It's Not Your Business!

2012-01-01T14:47:00.000-08:00

Rihanna smokes. So what? It’s nobody’s business but hers if she does. If I still smoked and someone came up to me and gave me a hard time about it, I’d tell him the same thing: “butt out of my business!” Liberals think they have the right to judge everybody else, but they don’t want us to be “judgmental” of them. It’s the typical “double standard” liberals apply to everything. It’s okay for US to do it, but not for you. Liberal lawmakers regularly make laws for US, while exempting themselves. Like that law that makes it LEGAL to do “insider trading” if you’re a member of Congress while putting us “peons” in prison for doing the same thing. (The Daily Mail)

What A Failure Obama Has Been!

2011-12-31T14:45:00.000-08:00

“The latest from Barncat Jones is called ‘Oh, Oh, Obama!’ At a moment when many Republicans seem to be losing the forest (beating Obama) in the trees (Gingrich, Paul, Santorum, et al.), it is good to take a moment to focus on the awful failure that the Obama administration has been:” I don’t have room here to detail the many ways Obama has been a failure, but suffice it to say there have been many ways. Of course, the liberals don’t agree with that, since they think many of my failures are successes for them. Such as the national health care swindle, for instance. (Power Line)

Tea Party and OWS Alike?

2011-12-31T14:42:00.000-08:00

What a load of steaming, stinking brown stuff! The only similarity is they both demonstrate. But the Tea Party demonstrations do not create massive garbage and excrement messes for somebody else to clean up. They clean up after themselves. They do not threaten violence, as one OWS demonstrator has done (see link). There IS no violence at their demonstrations (see the news about the rapes, murders, and stabbings at OWS gatherings). They don’t “camp out” on somebody else’s property, claiming First Amendment protection for violating the rights of the owners of that property. The Tea Party people have clear demands, including smaller government, less intrusion on our lives, fewer taxes, and more freedom.

The OWS people CLAIM to want a lot of things, but they all “boil down” to one demand: a “free ride” at the expense of others. And their “targets” are all wrong: the biggest group of “top one percenters” are in Congress, and most have made that money because it is not illegal for members of Congress to “insider trade,” making their money doing what, for us, is ILLEGAL. Check out the number of congresspeople who came to Washington barely making it who are now “filthy rich.” The Clintons and other well-known political names come to mind. (The Blaze)

Peelosi's Hypocrisy

2011-12-29T13:51:00.000-08:00

She talks down “the rich.” She favors special taxes for people who EARN more than a certain amount (not people who make their money by owning part of money-making enterprises, like her). What she’s after is to “bring in the drawbridge” after she crossed the moat. She wants others not to be ABLE to make as much money as SHE has made because her government will take most of it away from them. And she spends $10,000 a NIGHT for a room in Hawaii. If this isn’t something a rich person would do, I’ll kiss her rear end. The funny thing about politicians who bad-mouth “the rich” is that they only want to stop those NOW earning money from BECOMING millionaires, like her (estimates of her net worth range from 100 million to $175 million). But she will continue to live like a millionaire. Democrats say she’s just helping those working for that hotel by spending so much money. I submit that didn’t even enter her mind. All she wants to do is “lord it over” everyone. “See, it’s NANCY! I’m rich! You’re NOT!. Like Clinton losing no opportunity to tell us how rich HE is. Sheesh! (The Blaze)

Clinton Wants Another Term

2011-12-29T13:49:00.000-08:00

He says presidents ought to be able to serve a third term. I don’t know if he means a third CONSECUTIVE term or just a third one, period. That means he thinks he could run again and ignorant Democrats would put him back in office so he could again get oral sex in the White House while an Islamic terrorist waits in his outer office. This is something every Democrat wants to do as his second term approaches. If Obama got re-elected and then got re-elected again, he could finish the job of destroying this country. I sincerely hope the American people have “wised up” enough to scotch this effort. (Real Clear Politics)

Ode to the Welfare State

2011-12-28T13:42:00.000-08:00

This is a poem published in the “Daily News” or new York on Nov. 4, 1949, and sums up perfectly the thinking of ALL Democrats to this day. It was written by a “prominent Democrat from the state of Georgia” who remained unnamed. Probably because he feared he’d be KILLED if it were known who he was. In those days, as in THESE days, you COULD get yourself killed for asking the question asked by this kid. I think this poem makes a profound statement on the human condition. (Power Line)

Peelosi is Stupid, As Usual

2011-12-28T13:40:00.000-08:00

Peelosi (the House leader whose stupid actions cost her the leadership and her party the majority is still making stupid statements. One would think she’d shut up after that “pass the bill to find out what’s in it” fiasco. But NO! Now she says unemployment would be at 15% without Obama’s “stimulus.” It may get there yet, and it is more than that in some places. I remember when they said their stimulus would keep it from reaching 8%! These people never learn, and they think we have no memories at all. (CNS News)

Every Opportunity

2011-12-22T14:13:00.000-08:00

Those “global warming” believers will use every opportunity to push their agenda, even if AlGore has to rename it to make it believable. He now calls his swindle “climate change” so he can even use a major snowstorm to promote his swindle and NBC is doing just that. “On Tuesday's NBC Nightly News, anchor Brian Williams followed a story on the late October northeast snow storm by ominously proclaiming: ‘Everybody out east said the same thing about this freak snowstorm, This kind of thing didn't used to happen. This never happened before. And while that is true, it may also be true that we'll all have to start getting used to this kind of thing over the long haul." Which means, without saying it, that “climate change” is at fault. They don’t mention that all this is CYCLICAL. And it HAS happened before, and WORSE. You mention that to a “believer” and he will laugh at you and never change an iota of his/her belief. (Media Research Center)

"Cleaning Up Bush's Mess"

2011-12-22T14:09:00.000-08:00

Does Obama really think we still believe this lie? If he does, he;s stupider than I thought he was. He’s been in office long enough now for ANY “mess” to have his Name on it. It’s time to start “owning up to” his own responsibility for the “mess we’re in.” And it IS HIS MESS. A mess Democrats CREATED to get him into office. What Bush did was continue an atmosphere that caused the longest running economic boom that started with Reagan’s tax rate cuts to continue until the Democrat law (“Citizen’s Reinvestment Act of 1977”) finished its job of killing the financial picture in America by FORCING lenders to loan money to people who could not afford to repay it, a “recipe for disaster” if there ever was one, no matter how much they protest otherwise. Just use your own common sense. (The Blaze)

Why always the GOP?

2011-12-21T14:15:00.000-08:00

Obama is demanding the GOP “back down” on the 2-month extension of the payroll (Social Security) tax reduction. An extension that will cost employers more than leaving it in place would cost employees because of the time and work involved in changing the software, then changing it back after two months. From what I hear it would take THREE months to get it changed, so we’re talking about SIX month’s work to implement this silly law. So why is it the GOP that gets all the criticism for not being willing to vote for something as stupid as this? Furthermore, I'm tired of these "temporary" fixes to a problem the liberals themselves created by not coming up with a budget since Obama was elected. (Fox News)

Example of Rank Stupidity

2011-12-21T14:12:00.000-08:00

A Muslim cleric says women should stay away from bananas and cucumbers because being close to them might make them horny. “[An] unnamed sheik, who was featured in an article on el-Senousa news, was quoted saying that if women wish to eat these food items, a third party, preferably a male related to them such as their father or husband, should cut the items into small pieces and serve. He said that these fruits and vegetables 'resemble the male penis' and hence could arouse women or 'make them think of sex.' He also added carrots and zucchini to the list of forbidden foods for women." Yet another example of their fright at the very thought of their women even THINKING of sex. How about their MEN? Are their men better equipped to withstand the “allure” of anything resembling the male sex organ? Gimme a break! (The Blaze)

American Intelligence "Out of the Loop"

2011-12-20T13:20:00.000-08:00

Kim Il Jung died Saturday (good riddance to more bad rubbish) but our intelligence services had no idea of it until this communist regime predictably waited two days to announce it to the world, no doubt so they could all consolidate their own little fiefdoms within the N. Korean government. I heard a rumor (unsubstantiated) that he died of asphyxiation while holding his breath waiting for Obama to keep his promise to come to N. Korea and bow to him, as he has done to every other dictator in the world BUT Kim. (New York Times)

The "Volt" Scandal

2011-12-20T13:16:00.000-08:00

It was found that the Chevy Volt was subject to its batteries catching fire three weeks after it was crash tested, back in June. But that information was hidden until November. Meanwhile they were still (trying) to sell it to the public while lying about Toyota’s gas pedal problems, trying to “bring Toyota to its knees.” Then there are the myriad other problems with the Volt, most of which have been “papered over.” “There's a Talmudic blog debate currently underway on the question of whether GM directly "lied" or merely avoided the truth with evasive Clintonian language.” (The Daily Beast) What’s the difference between lying and just “avoiding the truth?” A lie is a lie is a lie. It’s like the lies they told to “paper over” the fact that Solyndra was moving quickly toward bankruptcy even while Obama’s government approved even more money in subsidies.

Profit is the Purpose

2011-12-18T14:07:00.000-08:00

Liberals think the only purpose of business is to provide jobs for people. Nothing could be further from the truth. The whole purpose of ANY business is to make a profit for the owner. Employment opportunities only become available when the business NEEDS things to be done. Then they hire people. It’s not the other way around. They don’t hire people for the good of those people, it’s for THEIR OWN good. Without that profit motive there’s NO REASON for anybody to go in business. Bill Gates, for instance, didn’t go in business to make a bunch of millionaires along the way to becoming one himself. That was a “side-benefit” of it. He also created many “well-to-do” people along the way, also as a “side benefit.” Not as a central purpose. Anybody who thinks a company should sell their wares for the same amount of money they paid for it is a FOOL. But that’s what liberals think. Therefore, they’re fools. (Just common sense)

The Buggy Whip Maker

2011-12-18T14:04:00.000-08:00

There is always a victor and a loser whenever a society takes a “giant leap” in technology. When the automobile was invented, it was the buggy whip maker, the buggy maker, and the horse breeder. Today it’s the Post Office. Hard work to avoid bankruptcy aside, I expect the Post office to “go down” in my lifetime. Politicians think they can avoid it, which only points up their own incompetence. They’ll throw billions, maybe even trillions of Monopoly dollars into the effort, but it is doomed to failure. We can only hope they are smart enough to allow private enterprise to develop the means to deliver things that cannot be delivered by e-mail. Parcel Post will go first because private enterprise already has an advantage over them. The only thing keeping private enterprise from outdoing them in delivery of private mail is the law protecting the Post Office from competition. Private enterprise must “step up” and come up with a substitute for the government-subsidized postal system before it goes “belly up.” Which is going to be soon. (Mail.com)

Obama to Win in a Landslide?

2011-12-17T14:54:00.000-08:00

What a FOOL this guy is! A radio personality (the one who compared Romney to the KKK, you’ll remember) thinks Obama is going to win the election in a landslide. Gawd, there are such FOOLS among us! If Obama DOES win in a landslide, the number of such fools out there are much more numerous than I had imagined. That doesn’t alter the fact they ARE fools. MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts, who has won our prize for the biggest fool in television, now numbers among other fools Michael Tomasky, special correspondent for Newsweek and The Daily Beast, who apparently agrees with him. But I expect such stupidity from such people. I expect similar sentiments from someone at Time Magazine soon. You know, the magazine that put masked demonstrators on their cover as “People of the Year” this year, after putting Gorbachev and other dictators in a similar position before. Things like this make me glad I’m in my seventies and won’t be around much longer to see the results of such stupidity. (Media Research Center)

Being Run By Incompetents

2011-12-17T14:52:00.000-08:00

Have you ever noticed that we are faced with a new “panic” just about every day? That tells me two things: one, they use the panics to frighten us into allowing them to do things we normally wouldn’t allow, and two: they’re incompetent. I can only remember ONE competent president in my lifetime, and that is Ronald Reagan. He came into power and soon reduced the double-digit inflation to about 4%, then reduced the national debt and started the longest-running economic boom in recent memory by simply REDUCING the percentage at which we were taxed, which almost DOUBLED the “tax take” in the next few years. Then some liberals were elected and soon had us in “panic mode” again. Now they’ve spent ALL the money we have, and much more. They’ve spent more money in less than three years than ALL the previous administrations have spent since the inception of this country. They’re gaily figuring out how to spend even more while people if INTELLIGENCE wonder at their stupidity. (Just common sense)

Maybe If They Stopped Killing People...

2011-12-15T11:50:00.000-08:00

Yemen’s al-Qaida wants to change its name. It says the current name has “negative connotations.” Ya think? Maybe if they stopped murdering people for no other reason than they don’t believe exactly the same way THEY do. Like the Democrats and liberals (a repetition, there) do, when the name they use like liberals, progressives, ACORN, etc., when that name becomes KNOWN to represent crap, they just change it and it takes a while for people to realize it’s the same old crown under a new name. (The Blaze)

The China Scam

2011-12-15T11:48:00.000-08:00

A caller to the Rush Limbaugh show brought out something I’ve known for a long time and put it very succinctly: “China has a veneer of prosperity over a lot of poverty.” He noted that all you ever see is their big cities and never get to the countryside where poor people are still plowing fields behind oxen and bringing their crops to market behind horses. A stiff wind will blow over their badly and cheaply built buildings, and has upon occasion, killing lots of people. But China doesn’t care about that. They figure they have too many people already. That’s why they kill their females children in the womb. Yes, we kill our own children in the womb, but we kill male AND female children, just to get rid of them when we forget to use a rubber. (Just common sense)

They Got It Way Wrong

2011-12-14T13:24:00.000-08:00

From Obama to the “far right,” they got it wrong on Egypt. “I have in mind the latest blunder by the experts — their assessment, just a few months ago, of the nature of the Arab Spring and its democracy movement. Back in spring, the leading experts — from the Obama administration to the neoconservatives on the right to the major liberal media to most of the academic area specialists — were all overwhelmingly predicting that all those great secular, liberal, college-educated kids with their iPhones in Tahrir Square represented the new Egypt and would bring all their wonderful values to the revolution.” So now we have a military government that won’t go away and a recent announcement that “Sharia law” would be the base of their laws in the future. How wrong were they? As wrong as they can be. Which is an example of how incompetent our current “leaders” are. What amazes me is that people in the Middle East actually voted their rights away. (News Max/Tony Blankley)

Is Anybdy Surprised?

2011-12-14T13:20:00.000-08:00

As Barney Frank "retires," the media extols his “accomplishments” while ignoring his role in the housing crisis (He authored the Citizen’s Reinvestment Act of 1977 that forced lenders to loan money to people they KNEW could never repay it, a “recipe for disaster”). He also created and defended Fannie and Freddie, two “money pits” for the feds, created to “keep the lid on” until they needed it to get Democrats elected in 2008. These two actions alone are the biggest contributors to the financial disaster in which we now find ourselves. Barney, instead of being praised, should be charged with many crimes and sent to prison while the lenders who survived this insurrection should be given medals. (Media Research Center)

Who Sez He's Conservative?

2011-12-13T13:55:00.000-08:00

Michael Savage, the guy a lot of people CALL a “conservative” has offered Newt Gingrich a million dollars to stop running for president. Does he really think Newt is as shallow as that? Newt is already a millionaire several times over, just from his books. And if he did like most members of Congress, he made a lot more money from the “legalized” insider trading that was possible while he was in the Congress. Why would he need to take Savage’s money? He probably has more than Savage. As to being a conservative, Savage is NOT. He only pretends to be one to help liberals. As to Newt's ability to beat Obama, the Easter Bunny could do that. Newt is one of the most powerful candidates. That's why he wants to be rid of him. (Yahoo News)

Obama's Obvious Lies

2011-12-13T13:53:00.000-08:00

Obama doesn’t seem to care that we know he’s lying just about every time he opens his mouth. Aside from the “lowering the sea levels” lie and the recent lie in a speech about having reduced taxes 17 times (which we KNOW he hasn’t), he is now telling us he has done more for Israel’s security than anybody when anyone with ANY amount of intelligence knows better. Obama is the worst thing to happen to Israel in recent years. He has done more to UNDERMINE Israel than any other president. Yet he brazenly lies and says he is a “good friend” to Israel. What a FOOL he is! (The Blaze)

They Want to Control Your Life

2011-12-11T13:34:00.000-08:00

It’s not about smoking cigarettes; it’s not about guns. It’s not about driving gas-sipping vehicles. It’s not about any of those things. It’s about controlling what you can and cannot do. Boston proved it when they banned electronic cigarettes, which have nothing to do with tobacco or smoke, and pollute nothing. It LOOKS like you’re smoking And that infuriates the control freaks. [Recently], “e-cigarettes are harder to come by for residents of Boston, the Massachusetts state capital, and there are fewer places where they can legally use them. That’s because the Boston Public Health Commission voted to start treating e-cigarettes as a tobacco product. Tough new restrictions were introduced with immediate effect and so Bostonians can no longer use e-cigarettes in workplaces, including on patios, decks and loading docks. The sale of e-cigs is now also restricted to adults only and retailers have to obtain a special permit to sell them and then keep them behind the counter." (Spiked/Natalie Rothschild)

Ya Gonna Shoot Me?

2011-12-11T13:32:00.000-08:00

Alec Baldwin’s latest rant on Twitter against conservatives; ‘Gun-loving, war-mongering trolls . . . bring it.” “Bring it?” What are you going to do if I bring a gun, shoot me? With what? Alec Baldwin is one of the most vocal of liberal fools. And he doesn’t even realize what he’s doing to his own career with these stupid statements. People like Baldwin should just shut up with their stupidities. The bad part is there isn’t just one of him. Do his stupidities rub off on his brothers? It’s so hard to tell them apart I just stay away from anything that has anybody who looks like him in it. I refuse to suffer fools gladly, and he definitely fits that description. (The Blaze)

Partisan Politics NOT to Blame

2011-12-10T13:58:00.000-08:00

Colin Powell thinks so; Obama thinks so. Many of our other incompetent “leaders” think so, but they’re all wrong. The “Founders” built that INTO out political model. They knew that no disagreement in government meant a dictator, with whom nobody DARED disagree, and they didn’t want that. What’s REALLY responsible is one law, made by Democrats, back in the seventies: The “Citizen’s Reinvestment Act of 1977,” which FORCED lenders to loan money to people they KNEW could never repay it. They KNEW it would create an “economic disaster” down the road. That was their design. They created Fannie and Freddie to “keep the lid on” until it was “needed” to get many Democrats elected, and it worked like a charm.

Republicans tried many times to get rid of it, but were rebuffed by Democrats (Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and their Democrat buddies, who WROTE the law) every time. They “shut down” Fannie and Freddie” (temporarily) just before the 2008 elections and the law predictably caused the “economic disaster” they wanted. They blamed Republicans and the very lenders they victimized for it and “took over the government in a bloodless coup”, after which they refunded Fannie and Freddie with unlimited funds to keep things from getting worse while Democrats were in power, then spent more money than there IS, which they also blamed on the Republicans. (News Max/Tony Blankley)

Who Decides?

2011-12-10T13:56:00.000-08:00

Who has the right to decide what’s best for our children? Their parents or some nameless, faceless bureaucrat somewhere? Parents who don’t want their children vaccinated are being “criminalized” by the medical bureaucrats. These bureaucrats are implying their refusal is putting not only theirs, but other children “at risk,” and so should be punished on the word of somebody else. That’s the way the government gains, and maintains control over us. (SF Gate)

...And Again

2011-12-08T13:44:00.000-08:00

I’m beginning to believe computers in general just do not like me. I’ve lost count of the many computer failures in the last few months. I think the one I’m using is the fourth or fifth recently. Yesterday my Internet went out, apparently because the plug-in USB Adapter failed. I bought a new one and installed it this morning. It seems to be working. Now all I have to fight with this particular computer is the lack of a properly working sound system I’ve been fighting since I got this computer. I can get computer generated music, and sometimes music from videos on the Net. Plus, I got words from people talking on videos, once. It was recommended I install Adobe Shock Wave, which so far has not worked. At least my Internet is back. Although this computer is acting up. I wonder how long it will last.

Typical Liberal Swindle

2011-12-08T13:41:00.000-08:00

They wanted to get a lot of guns into the Mexican drug wars so they could SAY that “most of their guns come from the United States” and use that to strengthen anti-gun laws. They screwed up. It didn’t work. They didn’t tell the media the guns that came from the U. S. were sold by this government itself, but they found out. After the conservative media broke it, they HAD to cover it, and it has become one of Obama's biggest scandals. I hope it sinks him. This is how the liberals in our government try to fool us into letting them do things we normally wouldn’t allow. When are we going to wake up and question their every action? And I mean even when the Republicans are in power because they do it, too. (American Thinker)

HALAL Turkeys?

2011-12-08T13:39:00.000-08:00

Butterball Turkeys are killed in accordance with Islamic standards, though without the ritual prayers required for Islamics to eat them. You’d be surprised how far “Islamic standards” have wormed their way into American manufacturing. What the hell FOR? Yes, it isn’t illegal, but WHY? We don’t Need “HALAL certified” meats. We don’t WANT them. I won’t EAT such products if I'm aware of it. I’m getting sick and tired of how many ways and in how many places Islamic practices have “wormed their way” into our lives. Islam is a phony “religion,” founded by a pedophile to cover his “marrying” a nine-year-old. I won’t have anything to do with it. Call me an “Islamaphobic” (another phony word) if you want. I don’t care. It means nothing to me. (American Thinker/Pam Geller)

Iran Asking For It

2011-12-06T11:26:00.000-08:00

Iran has been “Asking for it” for a long time, beginning with their kidnapping of American diplomats while that wimp, Carter was in power. I think Carter surprised them with his attempt at rescue, but not with his incompetence in the attempt. They’ve been “picking at us” for many years, including several kidnappings for ransom and many things that under a REAL president (not Carter-like Obama) would result in Iran becoming a steaming pile of rubble. What galls me is the guy making the most noise today was SEEN among the kidnappers of the diplomats before they “chickened out’ and released them when Reagan was elected. Like Saddam Hussein, Ahmadinjerk will end up in a “deep hole,” hiding from the people he used to “rule” after we “take him down.” This is how people like him end. (Yahoo News)

Elect Competent People

2011-12-06T11:24:00.000-08:00

In the last few years we have elected nothing but INCOMPETENT people to run this country, and then we wonder when they screw up so badly they spend more money than there IS on their “flights of fancy.” Things they call “compassion.” Newt Gingrich says “we need to drill HERE!” while the other candidates keep that self-defeating policy of banning drilling for oil in areas we control. This is the kind of candidates we need to elect. People who have mostly COMMON SENSE and intelligence. Admittedly, Newt “stumbled” when he made that commercial with “Princess Nancy” pushing AlGore’s global warming swindle, but I believe he’s seen the error of his ways, there. He has admitted it. The last intelligent politician I know of we sent to Washington was Ronald Reagan. It’s too bad he’s dead and can’t be elected again. But we need to search out people of INTELLIGENCE and competence to elect. It’s the only way to survive (I am NOT saying Newt is “my guy,” but he is close.). (Rush Limbaugh)

Incompetents in Washington

2011-12-04T13:50:00.000-08:00

We need to get some competent people in charge in Washington. People like Ronald Reagan, who undid most of the damage done by liberals before him. Unfortunately, in doing so, angered a lot of people who were getting a "free ride" which resulted in more liberals being elected after him. This will inevitably happen because some people want only to be "kept." That allowed them to not only undo just about everything HE did, but do many worse things. It's a political truism that what intelligent people do in Washington will anger others and cause them to elect many incompetents to replace the intelligent people. We haven't had a competent politician in the white House since Reagan and we've suffered for it. The only competent Republican I can see still in it is Bachmann, and she will get her share of poison from Democrats if she again rises to the top and especially if she gets the nomination. She's already had a sample of it when she WAS on top. She's the only GOP candidate whose WORDS show her to be an unashamed conservative. Hopefully, if she comes to the top, her words will be translated into action. But I've learned, many times, never to depend on a politician to do what he/she says will be done after gaining office. (Just common sense)

Supressing the Evidence

2011-12-04T13:47:00.000-08:00

In George Orwell’s “1984,” a prophetic novel written (strangely) by a liberal, the “hero’s” job was to change history to reflect current thinking. But he finally figured out his lie and stopped doing it. That got him in trouble with “Big Brother,” the ubiquitous “leader.” But today, the government doesn’t NEED to pay people to change history. Today, the “foremost historians” who write the history books do it willingly. And are ready and willing to hide the evidence otherwise. Example: “In October 1914, over 5 million Belgians faced starvation. The German Army had invaded on August 4 and swept across the country in three weeks. Revisionist historians would later snicker about "atrocities" invented by the British, but the Kaiser's troops executed over 5,500 Belgians, women and children as well as men, though there was no civilian resistance to the invasion.” This is how revisionist historians “bend” the news to suit themselves. (Media Research Center)

China Protits From the Dead

2011-12-03T15:00:00.000-08:00

They have a fleet of high-tech trucks that go places where people are killed and harvest their organs for sale to people with more money than they can spend otherwise (in China, mostly looted from by politicians from people of lesser wealth that them, which is usually most everybody) to stay alive at the expense of the dead. China murders Falun Gong members and steals their organs; they kill prisoners and these ubiquitous trucks show up to take the organs. Nobody knows how many other people the communist Chinese government murders so they can profit from selling their organs. But they’ve been doing it for a long time and are good at it. (Ouyang Fei, Sun Sixian, Lin Zhanxiang)

Supercommittee Fails

2011-12-03T14:57:00.000-08:00

“The Supercommittee is now officially a failure. On balance, I think that is a good thing, in part because the whole approach of trying to solve our country’s deep-seated fiscal problems with a closed-door, back-room deal is fundamentally wrong.” (John Hinderacker/Power Line) But this is how Obama does business: behind closed doors; even though he promised (like a lot of other Democrats) a “completely open and transparent administration (which, like all those other democrats, he didn’t deliver).” The whole idea of this “supercommittee” is illegal and unconstitutional, and is PLANNED to fail so Obama can emasculate the Defense Department and Medicare without having to accept the blame, which will make a lot of people mad. These people will put pressure on to reverse these cuts and he can blame the Republicans while advancing his agenda to move us ever closer to socialism. (Power Line)

Terrorist Supports Obama

2011-12-01T14:02:00.000-08:00

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews asked (Obama’s then press flack Robert) Gibbs point blank if home-grown terrorist bomber Bill Ayers had hosted a fundraiser for "your candidate" (Obama) in his race for Illinois State Senate. (Breitbart TV) Then Gibbs lied outright: "No he did not have a fundraiser for our candidate," said Gibbs, who then repeated, "He did not have a fundraiser for him." Gibbs elaborated that the claimed fundraiser was "another myth propagated by the McCain that has been debunked both by people in the Chicago media and in the national media." Matthews did not press him on that lie. Then later Ayers came right out and told an audience he DID. (American Thinker)

Marry Your Rapist!

2011-12-01T14:00:00.000-08:00

Or go to prison for 12 years for “the shame she has brought on her family by her immorality,” even if it was forced. This is how Sharia law works. They blame the woman when she gets raped, and blame the man not at all. This follows the system of subjugating the woman to the man in all things, even to the point of MURDERING her if she so much as has a DATE with a non-Muslim. Switching from Islam to ANY other religion gets a DEATH sentence for a man OR a woman. In my opinion, this is one of the most screwed up religions in the history of the world. They are so afraid someone will take their women away from them they force them to go about in public only with a male family member, covered from head to toe for fear somebody will see them and lust after them. (Atlas Shrugs)

How Many More?

2011-11-30T12:24:00.000-08:00

How many more accusations of sexual misconduct will the Democrats bring up against Herman Cain, hoping one sticks? Why is it always the “front runner’ who gets such accusations and not the others? When another Republican becomes a front-runner will there be accusations of sexual misconduct against them? Or maybe something worse? I’m surprised a sexual misconduct accusation is their “weapon of choice,” since sexual misconduct (proven) on the part of their “most popular” president (Bill Clinton) made absolutely no difference? He was elected once in the face of serious sexual misconduct charges, and RE-elected in the face of new charges, this time amply proven. Two charges didn’t “get rid of” Cain, so now there is a third one, this time a simple “affair.” The woman claims she said nothing until Cain became a front-runner because she didn’t want to hurt him. So why does she want to hurt him, now? Was it the money from the Democrats? (Mail.com)

Revealing Themselves

2011-11-30T12:21:00.000-08:00

Politicians want to instill hate for cigarette-makers in Americans while collecting more on each pack of cigarettes than do the manufacturers, and without having a CENT invested In making or marketing cigarettes. They’re mad now that some people are smoking cigarettes without paying their unconscionable taxes on every pack of cigarettes. This tells us they aren’t at all interested in cutting down on smoking because it would take money out of THEIR pockets—and they want to stop anything that does that. Shame! SHAME on those who would try to escape their cigarette taxes! Actually, they screwed up. They forgot to put a tax on tobacco growing itself. I hate to give them ides, but they’re probably already thought of it. It’ll happen soon. By the way: I don't smoke, (The Blaze)

Democrats Must Really Be Aftraid

2011-11-29T13:52:00.000-08:00

Democrats can always be depended upon to tell us who frightens them the most. He (she)’s the one they attack the hardest and with the “dirtiest tricks.” Yesterday it was Sarah Palin; today it seems to be Herman Cain. I’m not a big Herman Cain fan. I don’t like his 9-9-9-plan. I think it’s too much. But I like him otherwise and I’ve been keeping track of all the phony accusations of sexual misconduct. Apparently two accusations didn’t work so they’re “trotting out” a third. This one with more “specifics.” Now he’s supposed to have had a 13-year “consensual” affair. The thing I hate is that Cain “waffles” when asked to simply deny ANY sex. Like most politicians, he says he wants to wait and see what she says before answering. What is this? Either he did or he didn’t, no matter what she says. C’mawn, Herman! Don’t put it off, ANSWER the question. Waffling only makes you look more guilty. Of course if he were a Democrat an illicit affair over 13 years would be a resume enhancement. (Mail.com)

It's NOT the Catholic Church's "Conscience Thing"

2011-11-29T13:49:00.000-08:00

It’s not. Abortion KILLS a human being in the womb, before he/she even gets a chance at life. It has nothing to do with religious beliefs. I’m not a Catholic, or a member of any other kind of church, but I can see that, even if people like Peelosi can’t. Murder is murder, even without religion. Abortion KILLS. Like terrorism, it KILLS people (and has probably killed more people). People who are in favor of abortion can find all sorts of excuses to justify their murders for the “convenience” of those who would rather KILL the result of unprotected sex rather than use a rubber. She talks about “letting women die on the floor,” but thinks nothing about BABIES “dying on a table” in the operating room. Gawd, what a scaggy woman this is. I don’t even want to KNOW a person of the type she is. (Washington Post)

A Bunch of Wimps

2011-11-27T13:58:00.000-08:00

The Republicans say they’re not going to defund Obama’s health care swindle law because they’re afraid if they do, the Democrats will shut down the government and blame it on them. What a bunch of sniveling, spineless wimps they are! You don’t abandon a position the entire last election elected MANY Republicans over because you’re AFRAID the opposition will pull a “dirty trick” and blame you for it. We need to elect some Republicans with SPINES! We can’t elect Democrats with spines because there aren't any; they don’t even know what they are. Democrats are incompetent coming out of the starting gate because they believe in COLLECTIVISM, rather than the free market. Collectivism has proven it does NOT work time and again, but that doesn’t faze Democrats in their ignorance. (CNS News)

Ex-Cop Marine "Deals With" OWS Protester

2011-11-27T13:55:00.000-08:00

Same Thing Over and Over

2011-11-26T14:05:00.000-08:00

Even though that’s the definition of insanity, Obama continues to do the same stupid things over and over, hoping for a different outcome. He appointed an admitted COMMUNIST to be his “green jobs” czar; he appointed a tax cheat to run the Treasury Department, under which is (you guessed it) the Internal Revenue Service; and now has appointed a woman who ran a company that DEFRAUDED Medicare to run it. Whoever is advising Obama on these things mystifies me. He couldn’t appoint worse people for these positions, and probably will continue to do so, without comment from critics or the liberal (biased) media. (American Thinker)

Obama's Solyndra Scam

2011-11-26T14:03:00.000-08:00

The Obama administration KNEW Solyndra was in trouble well before the midterm elections, but put pressure on Solyndra to hold off on Layoffs until AFTER the midterm elections so as not to upset (his) voters. This is sure and certain PROOF the Obama administration KNEW Solyndra was in danger of going “belly-up” even before the midterms but made sure the American people would not know about it until AFTER as many Democrats as possible were elected. It didn’t work. The “Tea Party candidates” won in a landslide and Obama lost his total dominance of the federal government. Not just because of Solyndra, but because of his complete INCOMPETENCE in all things except how to get elected. And he will lose in the 2012 election for the same reason. (Washington Post)

The Thanksgiving Myth

2011-11-24T13:36:00.000-08:00

The myth of Thanksgiving is still what is taught, and that myth is basically that a bunch of thieves from Europe arrived quite by accident at Plymouth Rock, and if it weren't for the Indians showing them how to grow corn and slaughter turkeys and how to swallow and stuff, that they would have died of starvation and so forth. The Indians were great -- and then, in a total show of appreciation, we totally wiped out the Indians! We took their country from 'em. We started racism, sexism, bigotry, homophobia; spread syphilis; and, basically, destroyed the environment. That is the multicultural version of Thanksgiving, and it simply isn't true." (Rush Limbaugh) It's a load of steaming, stinky brown stuff. The first settlers in America were bound by an agreement with the people who financed their trip her to operate under what amounts to communism, in that everybody had “one share” of any bounty created by all of them and did not OWN anything. It was when new Governor Bradford gave each a plot of land to farm and SELL the overage, he created the “free market” and saved the colony. This is the story hidden by revisionist historians, much as the stealing BACK of property taken by the king was what Robin Hood was all about. (Rush Limbaugh)

That "Peaceful" Religion

2011-11-24T13:33:00.000-08:00

A Muslim father MURDERED all three of his daughters for “dating the wrong boys. “A Muslim father charged with murdering his three daughters in apparent honour killings has said he would do it again - even if they came back to life 100 times. Mohammad Shafia, 58, cursed his daughters Zainab, 19, Sahar, 17, and Geeti, 13, saying they were 'treacherous' as he likened them to prostitutes during a conversation that was recorded by police. He is on trial for their murders after they were found dead in the family car along with Shafia's first wife, Rona Amir, 50, in the Rideau Canal, located in the Kingston area of Ontario in Canada in 2009. Shafia, who moved to Canada from Afghanistan with his family, is polygamous and after his arrest was heard telling his second wife, Tooba Yahya, that their daughters had brought shame on the family’.” This is an example of the way this “peaceul religion” works. That’s in addition to the fact that it brings a DEATH SENTENCE to convert from Islam to another religion. (The Daily Mail)

Rezko Gets 10-1/2 Years

2011-11-23T14:35:00.000-08:00

But will anybody (except people like me who pay attention and tell the truth) ask Obama what he thinks about the guy who introduced him to numerous money men, raised mucho bucks for him and helped him fool the world when he bought the lot next door to his home? Not likely. People just don’t call attention to the corruption in which Obama is involved lest they be called racist. Solyndra was more than just a financial screwup; it was the THEFT from the taxpyers of $500 million dollars, that he gave to some of his financial supporters. This is how he rewards them. How many more such cases there are, we’ll probably never know because Obama and his crowd are good at covering such things up. (American Thinker)

Yes, It IS!

2011-11-23T14:33:00.000-08:00

MSNBC commentator Alex Wagner says the Second Amendment should be removed from the Constitution because it is not “on the same level” with other Amendments. But it IS! If anything, it is MORE IMPORTANT than many others. Who is SHE to attempt to judge the importance of a constitutional Amendment? Maybe that’s her ploy to get noticed. Without the Second Amendment, the whole idea of self defense is gone. But, Second Amendment or not, I WILL defend myself, regardless of what Alex thinks. (Real Clear Politics)

"It Has to Be Racism!

2011-11-22T14:11:00.000-08:00

Liberals can’t seem to figure any reason why NASCAR fans would boo a woman who, with her husband, has shown so much disdain for them and their choice of entertainment UNTIL they need their votes to hang onto office. I wonder how many minutes it took for liberals to “use the race card” in this Case? EVERY time ANYONE criticizes Obama or his wife, they CALL it racism. No one believes it any more. EVERY instance of criticism for this incompetent president and his equally incompetent wife CANNOT be racism. But they use it so they won’t have to answer ANY criticism on the merits. They think because we were stupid enough (not me) to elect him president, they’re better than we are. (CBS News)

Liberals Know Nothing

2011-11-22T14:08:00.000-08:00

They claim we have gotten into many UNNECESSARY wars and that the cost of fighting them is the reason for the financial problems we face. Nothing could be further from the truth. First of all, the wars are NOT individual wars; they are all “different theaters” in ONE WAR: the war against Islamic terrorism, which was declared against us on September 11, 2001. The cost of fighting this war is very small, compared to the $TRILLIONS of dollars the liberals in our government have WASTED on their phony efforts to promote “green energy” and socialism. Obama alone has wasted trillions of dollars pursuing his “dream” to put us on a “green energy” kick and make this country into the ”Union of Soviet Socialist America.” Then he loaned $billions to a RUSSIAN businessman to do I don’t know what. What possible thing could a RUSSIAN businessman who already HAS billions do to be something the United States ought to support? The liberals have been mostly “in control” for the last FIFTY years and have pushed us into bankruptcy by their prolific and silly spending. Their “big thing” is SOCIALISM, and if they succeed in imposing it fully on this country, we’re lost. They’re always talking about “sharing the wealth,” without talking about just WHO they plan to STEAL that wealth before they “share it.” They talk about “the rich not paying their share” of income taxes, completely ignoring the fact that “the rich” pay 86% of income taxes paid while earning a LOT less than that much of the totals earned. Yet the American people, most of whom simply don’t pay attention to politics, believe every word they spew. (Just common sense)

Kagan is Biased

2011-11-20T11:41:00.000-08:00

And she won’t recuse herself when the case involving Obama’s health care swindle comes up. It’s obvious she intends to attempt to get a “positive vote” for this unconstitutional law. Well, I guess that’s why Obama appointed her: she is his “secret weapon” in his fight to impose this unconstitutional socialist law upon us. There should be a law FORCING judges with KNOWN biases to recuse themselves from such cases, but don’t expect it from this Congress. You'll never see it until such a law hurts Republicans. (Glenn Beck)

Right to the Heart

2011-11-20T11:38:00.000-08:00

As usual, Mallard Fillmore goes right to the heart of things. This cartoon takes on the fact that the “Occupy Whatever” fools always leave a stinky mess for somebody else to clean up, while the “Tea Parties” do not. Additionally, I saw a comment to a comic strip this morning claiming that Tea Party demonstrators bring guns to their demonstrations. Liberals are always anxious to demonstrate their ignorance, and that comment does it nicely. (Mallard Fillmore)

Are Saudis REALLY Our Friends?

2011-11-19T13:01:00.000-08:00

Yes, Saudi citizens were the killers in the 9/11 atrocity, and people (mostly liberals) say that’s no reason to blame the Saudi government. But how about THIS? The Saudi government has offered all-expenses-paid trips to the Haji pilgrimage for the Palestinian terrorists released from prison in trade for kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. You remember Israel released 1000 of them as RANSOM for this soldier. The Saudis CLAIM to be our friends, but if you look at what they DO, not what they SAY, the truth comes out. This is not the only time the Saudis have sided with terrorists while PROFESSING their “friendship” for America. I think our political dolts such as Obama need to “wise up.” Recruiters for al-Qaida will probably be there to recruit them. (The Blaze)

The "Sexual Harassment" Myth

2011-11-19T12:56:00.000-08:00

A woman can accuse a man (or another woman) of sexual harassment if the other person “stands too close” and makes “hand movements” that makes her “uncomfortable.” Sexual harassment then becomes what the woman THINKS is sexual harassment. She gets to DEFINE what CONSTITUTES sexual harassment. This is wrong. But that is how we operate today. If a woman accuses a person of “sexual harassment” with some “vague reference” as to what CONSTITUTES it, they are believed implicitly. The other person is “stained” by the accusation and does NOT get to face his (or her) accuser, whose identity is kept secret. This is DOUBLY wrong, but again, this is how we operate today. If a man accuses a WOMAN of sexual harassment, he is laughed at, and nothing ever comes of the accusation. Some men say they WISH some woman would “sexually harass” them. The whole “sexual harassment” thing is based on an unconstitutional method allowing the person making the accusation to DEFINE what constitutes sexual harassment (subjective) while not allowing the accused to confront his (or her) accuser, which is patently unconstitutional, and rightly so. I feel sorry for ANYBODY some woman “targets” for a “sexual harassment” accusation. There is no way the accused can defend him(her)self against such vague, ill-defined accusations, especially when he(she) cannot directly confront his(her) accuser. (Just common sense)

"Illegal For You, But Not For Us!"

2011-11-17T13:48:00.000-08:00

I noted this several weeks ago and the liberal media has now “found it out” after they could ignore it no longer. I should not that Fox News was one of the first to “notice” it and report it. The story is this: members of Congress MAY “insider trade” with impunity and they use that to become millionaires during their tenure in Congress. Meanwhile they put people (like Martha Stewart) in PRISON for doing the same. How many times has a politician gone to Washington a pauper and left as a millionaire? It happens so often it is almost a “trend.” One politician (or two, maybe) are the Clintons, who waste not a moment in telling us how rich they are. Seems to me Bill Clinton only made about $40,000 a year as governor of Arkansas. I could name many more, including some who were already rich (like Nancy Peelosi) who become SUPER rich while in office by taking advantage of “insider knowledge.” This is WRONG, but don’t expect to see Congress do anything to reverse it. I’m really surprised to see CBS, a premier member of the “state-controlled Media” break this story. The pressure to do so must have been immense. (60 Minutes)

It's The Socialism, Stupid!

2011-11-17T13:46:00.000-08:00

No, not you. Obama. He’s moaning about this country “losing its will.” Yet he’s promoting the very thing that will CAUSE us to “lose our will to produce”: taking away the fruits of our labors as socialism does. During his (I think) “ill-fated” first run for president, he (famously) told one man, “Joe The Plumber,” that we needed to “spread the wealth around.” That should have been a clear warning that he wanted to impose collectivism (socialism) on us. He should have been rejected, not elected, although I’m not sure John McCain would have been a lot better. Since he was elected, he has spent more money than there IS. More than all previous presidents PUT TOGETHER. He has made countless “regulations”that have made it a lot harder to start, OR run a business. Everything we do today requires PERMISSION from a nameless, faceless bureaucrat. Permission to do things that should not require “permission” from anybody. One day soon, I will need a "permit" to write a blog like this, and the government will control what I may say in it. That's the day I shut it down. The Golden Gate Bridge couldn’t be built today because nobody could afford to wade through all the “red tape” required to install ONE girder. The cost to build it would be TEN TIMES what it cost originally. Obama and the rest of the liberals are the CAUSE of the “loss of incentive” in this country (that's a SYMPTOM of socialism) and Obama has the GALL to bemoan its loss. (The Weekly Standard)